Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeMedia coverage of this article
Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 14 Oct 2013 at 21:22 GMT
The following articles represent some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Bustle
Title: “Inaccurate CDC Surveys May Make Our Nutrition Knowledge Bogus | Bustle”
http://www.bustle.com/art...
Publication: Medical Daily
Title: “40 Years of U.S. Nutrition Research Could Be Invalid; Study Finds NHANES Methodology Seriously Flawed”
http://www.medicaldaily.c...
Publication: National Journal
Title: “Everything We Know About Nutrition May Be Wrong - NationalJournal.com”
http://www.nationaljourna...
Publication: Popular Science
Title: “40 Years Of U.S. Nutrition Data Is "Fatally Flawed" and "Physiologically Implausible" | Popular Science”
http://www.popsci.com/art...
Publication: University of South Carolina
Title: “40 Years of Federal Nutrition Research Fatally Flawed”
http://www.newswise.com/a...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
Media coverage of this article
PLOS_ONE_Group replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 18 Oct 2013 at 22:30 GMT
The following articles represent some of the media coverage that has occurred for this paper:
Publication: Big Think
Title: “40 Years of Government Nutrition Data May Be Flawed | Experts' Corner | Big Think”
http://bigthink.com/exper...
Publication: Bustle
Title: “Inaccurate CDC Surveys May Make Our Nutrition Knowledge Bogus | Bustle”
http://www.bustle.com/art...
Publication: Discovery News
Title: “Good Health Advice Gone Bad : Discovery News”
http://news.discovery.com...
Publication: Food Politics
Title: “Food Politics Annals of Nutrition Science: Coca-Cola 1; NHANES 0”
http://www.foodpolitics.c...
Publication: Med Page Today
Title: “Can We Trust Obesity Data?”
http://www.medpagetoday.c...
Publication: Real Clear Science
Title: “40 Years of Government Nutrition Data May Be Flawed - Blog”
http://www.realclearscien...
Publication: University of South Carolina
Title: “40 Years of Federal Nutrition Research Fatally Flawed”
http://www.newswise.com/a...
If you see any additional coverage of this paper in the press or blogosphere, please reply to this thread and add the link to the article.
RE: Media coverage of this article
MattJHodgkinson replied to PLOS_ONE_Group on 21 Oct 2013 at 17:02 GMT
Reaction to this article has included comments on the funding of this research and how this may have influenced the research, particularly by public health nutritionist Prof. Marion Nestle on her Food Politics blog: http://www.foodpolitics.c....
PLOS staff editors and the handling Academic Editor were aware both that this work could have important implications for NHANES nutrition research, and that the work was funded by an unrestricted grant from the Coca-Cola Company. The authors disclosed this funding and other potential competing interests when submitting to the journal, in line with our policy (http://www.plosone.org/st...), and this was highlighted to the Academic Editor by PLOS staff. PLOS editors are aware that industry funding, including from the food and beverage industry, can affect the conduct and reporting of research, e.g. see http://www.ploscollection.... The article was reviewed in detail by well-qualified researchers who were made aware of the potential competing interests, and the article underwent major revisions before being accepted.
This research does not negate the link between soda consumption and obesity. Under-reporting of dietary intake has long been known to be a major problem with self-reported data, particularly among obese individuals. Self-reported dietary intake data are of limited use and should be interpreted and reported with caution, and this article by Archer et al. underscores the need to develop better methods to measure what people are consuming.