Search
Advanced Search

Ratings

Posted by AndyFarke on 22 Feb 2009 at 06:34 GMT

    • Currently 4/5 Stars.
    • Currently 5/5 Stars.
    • Currently 5/5 Stars.
    • Currently 4.5/5 Stars.

I rate the article four stars for insight, because the article presents a major advance in our understanding of pterosaur respiration. Although the idea that pterosaurs had air sacs and potentially an avian-like respiratory system is not a new one (e.g., Bonde and Christiansen 2003; O'Connor, 2006), the detail of (and support for) the reconstruction of the respiratory system presented here is. Similarly, the detail of the analysis of fossils, integrated with the neontological data, warrants five stars for reliability. Finally, I also give five stars for "style," given the comprehensive presentation and multi-pronged evidence provided for the conclusions.

Post Your Response
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Response
 
Declare any competing interests.
Why should this posting be reviewed?

See also Guidelines for Notes, Comments and Corrections.

Identify Reason for Flagging
Thank You!

Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.