Search
Advanced Search

Ratings

Posted by Matthias on 11 Jul 2007 at 14:47 GMT

    • Currently 2/5 Stars.
    • Currently 2/5 Stars.
    • Currently 4/5 Stars.
    • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
    • Currently 4/5 Stars.
    • Currently 5/5 Stars.
    • Currently 4/5 Stars.
    • Currently 4.5/5 Stars.

For long imitation research has relied on subjective classifications of the investigators as "this behavior looks similar" or "they did it the same way". The authors of this paper put much effort in getting rid of such vague concepts and tried to formalize objective measures of similarity. This is an important step forward in imitation research. A weak point of this work might be the relatively moderate sample size - however this is (unfortunately) quite common for such studies.

Post Your Response
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Response
 
Declare any competing interests.
Why should this posting be reviewed?

See also Guidelines for Notes, Comments and Corrections.

Identify Reason for Flagging
Thank You!

Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.