Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms

Public Library of Science referenced this article in "Tyrannosaurus Re-examined" on 01 Aug 2008 at 15:39 GMT

"This week saw the publication of another dinosaur study in PLoS ONE. In the article, entitled, Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms, Thomas Kaye, at the Burke Museum of Natural History, and colleagues reported that material recovered"

Greg Laden's Blog referenced this article in "The seductive siren of soft tissue preservation: Ancient dinosaur flesh wasn't ancient. Or dinosaur flesh." on 31 Jul 2008 at 18:07 GMT

" An ugly fact killing a beautiful hypothesis I'm not mentioning any names, and don't ask me any details. In fact, don't repeat this story. Some years ago, when I was a mere graduate student, a fellow student working in an unnamed country in Africa..."

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted) referenced this article in "A Closer Look at Preserved Dinosaur Soft Tissue Reveals .. Slime" on 30 Jul 2008 at 23:14 GMT

"Soft tissue taken from fossilized dinosaur bones may not be dinosaur protein at all, but a bacterial slime known as bacterial biofilm"

Aetiology referenced this article in "Dinosaur soft tissue--just bacterial biofilm?" on 30 Jul 2008 at 22:00 GMT

"One of the coolest discoveries in recent years may turn out to be just contamination..."

A Blog Around The Clock referenced this article in "New and Exciting in PLoS ONE" on 30 Jul 2008 at 03:55 GMT

"There are 62 new articles in PLoS ONE this week. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. Here are my own picks for the week - you..."