Plant material and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) was used for the genetic analysis of mTERF22. Wild-type and individual mutant lines (i.e., T-DNA insertional lines) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC, Columbus, OH). Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) was used for GFP localization studies. Prior to germination, seeds of wild-type and mutant lines were surface sterilized by a vapor-phase method, with 50 ml sodium hypochlorite (bleach, 6%) solution containing 1.5 ml HCL, and sown on MS-agar plates containing 1% (w/v) sucrose. The seeds were kept in the dark for 5 days at 4°C and then germinated in a controlled temperature and light conditions (i.e., 22°C or 28°C, light intensity of 150 μE·m^-2·s^-1) in a growth chamber (Percival Scientific, Perry, IA, USA). Soil-grown plants were cultivated in growth chambers, under similar growth conditions (i.e., 22°C or 28°C, 50% RH and light intensity of 150 μE·m^-2·s^-1) in either short (SD 8:16-hour) or long (LD 16:8-hour) day conditions. PCR was used to screen the plant collection. Specific oligonucleotides are listed in S1 Table. Sequencing of PCR products was used to analyze the precise insertion sites in each T-DNA line.

Microscopic analyses

For the analysis of plant morphology plant organs where obtained from wild-type and homozygous lines, at specific developmental stages and examined under a Stereoscopic (dissecting) microscope. The morphologies of mitochondria (and plastids) were established by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of ultrathin sections of young (4~7 day-old) wild-type (Col-0) and mterf22 seedlings, grown on sucrose-containing MS medium plates, at the Bio-Imaging unit of the Institute of Life Sciences (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem).

GFP localization assays

A 300 nucleotide fragment of the N-terminus of mTERF22 (At5g64950) was fused in-frame to eGFP, and cloned into pSAT6 vector [51]. The resulting construct (N-mTERF22-GFP) was cloned into the binary pCAMBIA-2300 vector (Specific primers are listed in S1 Table). The vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105) by electroporation (1.8 kV, 25 μF, and 200 Ω), using Gene pulser II (Bio-Rad). The transformed A. tumefaciens cells were grown overnight at 28°C in YEP medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 mg/L). The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended to a final concentration equivalent to 1.0 O.D. at 600 nm in a solution containing 0.5 M MgCl₂, 0.5 M MES pH 5.6 and 0.1 M acetosyringone. For the localization analyses, three young leaves of N. benthamiana (4 to 6 week-old) were infiltrated with recombinant Agrobacterium strains using a 1 mL syringe (abaxial side, without a needle). GFP alone and GFP fused to N terminal region of the mitochondrial AtpB subunit [52, 53] were used as a controls. After 24~48 hours, the Agro-infiltrated leaves were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Olympus IX 81, Fluoview 500, Imaging facility, Volcani center). To visualize mitochondria in vivo, plant tissue was incubated with 2 μM MitoTracker^® for 10 min at room temperature prior to the confocal analyses.

Respiration activity

Oxygen consumption (O₂-uptake) measurements were performed with a Clarke-type oxygen electrode (Oxygraph, Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK), and the data feed was collected by Oxygraph-Plus software as described previously [54]. The electrode was calibrated with O₂-saturated water, and by depletion of the oxygen in the electrode chamber with the addition of excess sodium dithionite. Equal weights of three week-old seedlings (about 100 mg fresh tissue) were immersed in autoclaved tap water and incubated in the dark for a period of 30 min. Total respiration was measured at 25°C in the dark following the addition of plants to 2.5 ml of water in the respiration chamber.

Mitochondria preparation from MS-grown Arabidopsis seedlings

Isolation of mitochondria from Arabidopsis plants was performed as described previously [55]. About 10 gr MS-grown Arabidopsis seedlings were grinded with 500 ml extraction buffer (0.3 M Sucrose, 10 mM KH₂PO₄, 5 mM tetrasodiumpyrophosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 5 mM Cysteine, 1% Polyvinylpyrrolidone molecular weight 40,000 (PVP-40), 1% BSA, pH 7.5). The plant lysate was filtrated through two layers of miracloth and centrifuged at 2,500 ×g for 4 min (to remove cell debris) and then at 20,000 ×g for 20 min. The resultant pellet, containing intact chloroplasts and mitochondria was resuspended in a small volume (2~3 ml) of wash buffer (0.3 M sucrose, 10 mM MOPS, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.2), homogenized and loaded onto a 18%-25%-50% Percoll step gradient. The mitochondria fraction was obtained by ultracentrifugation at 40,000 xg for 45 min (mitochondria form a yellowish band between the 25 and 50% layers of the Percoll gradient). For immunoassays, mitochondria were suspended in sample loading buffer [56] and subjected to SDS-PAGE (at a constant 100 V). Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (BioRad) and incubated overnight (at 4°C) with various primary antibodies (S2 Table). Detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody.

Organellar protein extraction and analysis

Arabidopsis organellar proteins were prepared essentially as described previously [57]. Crude mitochondria membrane extracts were obtained from 200 mg MS-grown Arabidopsis seedlings. The plant tissue was homogenized in 2 ml of 75 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.6, 0.6 M sucrose, 4 mM EDTA, 0.2% polyvinylpyrrolidone-40, 8 mM cysteine, 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and protease inhibitor cocktail ‘complete Mini’ from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany). The lysate was filtrated through one layer of miracloth and centrifuged at 1,300 ×g for 4 min (to remove cell debris). The supernatant was then centrifuged at 22,000 ×g for 20 min. The resultant pellet enriched with mitochondrial membranes was washed with 1 ml of wash buffer 37.5 mM MOPS-KOH, 0.3 M sucrose and 2mM EDTA, pH 7.6. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (BioRad, Catalog no. 5000201) according to the manufacturer's protocol, with bovine serum albumin (BSA) used as a calibrator. For immunoassays, crude mitochondria fractions were suspended in sample loading buffer [56] and subjected to SDS-PAGE (at a constant 100 V). Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (BioRad, Catalog no. 1620177) and incubated overnight (at 4°C) with various primary antibodies (S2 Table). Detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody.

Blue native (BN) gel electrophoresis for isolation of native organellar complexes

Blue native (BN)-PAGE of mitochondria preparations was performed generally according to the method described by Pineau 2008 [57]. Mitochondria obtained from wild-type and mterf22 plants were solubilized with n-dodecyl-ß-maltoside (DDM; 1.5% [w/v]) in ACA buffer (750 mM amino-caproic acid, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0), and then incubated on ice for 30 min. The samples were centrifuged 8 min at 22,000 xg to pellet any insoluble materials. Serva Blue G was added to the clear supernatant to a final concentration of 0.2% (v/v). The samples were then loaded onto a native 4 to 16% linear gradient gel. For immunoblotting of non-denaturing PAGE, the proteins were transferred from the gel onto a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad) in Cathode buffer (50 mM Tricine, 15 mM Bis-Tris-HCl, pH 7.0) for 16 h at 4°C at constant current of 40 mA. The membranes were then incubated with specific primary antibodies (S2 Table), and detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated ‘secondary’ antibodies.

RNA extraction and analysis

Total RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis seedlings by TRIzol (Termo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was then treated with DNase I (RNase-free) (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove DNA contamination. RT-qPCR was performed with specific oligonucleotides (S3 Table), essentially as described previously [58–61]. Reverse transcription was carried out with the Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), using 1–2 μg of total RNA and 250 ng of a mixture of random hexanucleotides (Promega) and incubated for 50 min at 50°C. The RT reactions were stopped by 15 min incubation at 70°C and the RT samples served directly for real-time PCR. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions were run on a 384-well LightCycler 480^® Instrument II (Roche, Product no. 05015243001), using 2.5 μl of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master mix and 2.5 μM forward and reverse primers in a final volume of 5 μl. Reactions were performed in triplicate in the following conditions: pre-heating at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C, 10 sec at 58°C and 10 sec at 72°C. The nucleus-encoded 18S rRNA (At3g41768) and actin2 (At3g18780) were used as reference genes. The specific primers for each gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) were designed according to the guidelines by LightCycler^® 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche, Product no. 04887352001) for appropriate melting temperature of 58.0°C and PCRs product lengths between 90 bp to 120 bp (S3 Table and Ref’s [59–63]).

Mitochondrial ‘run-on’ transcription assays

Run-on transcription assays were preformed as described previously [64]. Freshly prepared mitochondria, obtained from 3-week-old MS-plates grown wild-type and mterf22 plants, were used in a nonradioactive labeling of organellar transcripts for the subsequent detection of ‘run-on’ mtRNAs. For this purpose, mitochondria were pelleted (10 min at 20,000 xg) and resuspended in a run-on mix (20 mM Tris pH 7.6, 40 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl 2, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM of each ATP, GTP and UTP, 0.3 mM CTP, 1 mM biotin-CTP, 40 U RNase inhibitor). Following 1 hour incubation, total mtRNA was obtained by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Northern blotting [58] was used for the analyses of de-novo transcription. mtRNA preparations following the run-on transcription were separated on agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to a charged nylon membrane. Transcriptional rates analyses were preformed according to the method described in [64]. Following membrane hybridization and washes, detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with streptavidin-HRP conjugated antibodies.

The At5g64950 gene-locus encodes an mTERF-related protein (mTERF22) that is localized to the mitochondria in vivo

Proteins which contain the MTERF domain were shown to function in various aspects of organellar (i.e., mitochondria or chloroplasts) gene expression and RNA metabolism, in both animals and plants. Arabidopsis encodes at least 35 mTERFs, many of which harbor N-terminal extension regions with sequence similarities to mitochondria and/or plastid targeting signals [28, 30, 31]. A list of the 35 mTERF members in Arabidopsis thaliana, their functions and intracellular loci can be found in Table 1. Here, we examined the roles of mTERF22, encoded by the At5g64950 gene-locus (Fig 1), considering the importance of mTERFs to organellar gene expression and RNA metabolism in ‘higher’ eukaryotes. Analysis of the expression profiles of the At5g64950 locus, available in the ‘Genevestigator microarray database’ [65] and AtGeExpress [66], suggest that mTERF22 is expressed at low levels in different tissues throughout the plant development (S1 Fig). mTERF22 is postulated to resides within the mitochondria [28], but no peptides corresponding to the mTERF22 protein could be identified in mass-spectrometry analyses of Arabidopsis organellar proteomes (SUBA3 server, [67]). However, this might be expected in light of the difficulties in detecting proteins expressed at a low level.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 1. Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) mTERF22 structure.

(A) Schematic representation of mTERF22 (At5g64950). The initiation (ATG) site and the stop codon (marked by asterisk) are outlined in the figure. The deduced N-terminal organelle targeting signal (mTP), and the seven MTERF domain are highlighted within the sequence, according to the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) [68] and SMART [69] servers. The locations of the T-DNA insertion sites in mterf22-1 (SALK- 032680), mterf22-2 (SAIL-1229) and mterf22-3 (SALK-133048) are indicated above the sequence (see also S2 Fig). Arrows indicate the positions of the left borders (LBs) in the T-DNA insertional lines. (B) Mutant genotypes were confirmed by PCR with oligonucleotides designed to gene-specific and T-DNA sequences (LBs; about 500 nts upstream or downstream of the T-DNA insertion) (i.e., pROK2 and pCSA110 vectors for SALK and SAIL lines, respectively), followed by sequencing of the ~500 nts PCR products. Specific oligonucleotides are shown below mTERF22 gene scheme (the oligonucleotides m1 for the screening of mterf22-1, m2 for mterf22-2, and m3 for mterf22-3 mutants) and their nucleotides sequences are listed in S1 Table. The relative accumulation of mRNA transcripts corresponding to mTERF22 in wild-type plants (Col-0) and mterf22 mutants was analyzed by RT-PCRs with gene-specific oligos (S1 Table). ACTIN2/8 (At3g18780) was used as a control in the reaction. The bar in panel ‘A’ represents 100 nucleotides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g001

To establish the intracellular location(s) of mTERF22 protein, a construct encoding the N-terminal region of mTERF22 gene was cloned in-frame to GFP, introduced into tobacco leaves by Agroinfiltration, and the intercellular location of the fusion mTERF22-GFP protein was examined by confocal microscopy (see Materials and Methods). RACE analyses were used to ensure the integrity of the start codon of mTERF22 in Arabidopsis (S2 Fig). As controls, we used GFP alone and a construct expressing the N-terminal region (54 amino acids) of the mitochondria localized ATP-synthase subunit B (AtpB) protein fused in frame to GFP [52, 53]. GFP alone was observed in the cytoplasm, whereas the signal of AtpB-GFP was detected as rod-shaped granules, co-localizing with those of mitochondrial MitoTracker marker (S3 Fig). Fluorescence signals within the nucleus that are apparent in the cases of both GFP and AtpB-GFP likely correspond to non-specific diffusions of these relatively small proteins through the nuclear pores [70]. Next, we analyzed the intracellular location of mTERF22 protein, in vivo. In agreement with published data [28] and its predicted localization to the mitochondria, the signal of the GFP-mTERF22 protein co-localized with the MitoTracker labeled mitochondria (Fig 2), further indicating that the At5g64950 encodes a mitochondria-localized protein.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 2. GFP localization analysis indicates that mTERF22 protein resides within the mitochondria.

Tobacco leaves were agroinfiltrated with GFP fused to the N-terminal region (100 amino acids) of the Arabidopsis mTERF22 (At5g64950) protein (see ‘Materials and Methods). GFP alone and GFP fused to the N-terminal region (54 amino acids) of ATP synthase b-subunit were used as controls for the integrity of the GFP localizations assays (see ‘Materials and Methods and S3 Fig). The GFP signals (green, upper left), MitoTracker marker (red, upper right), chlorophyll autofluorescence (blue, lower left) and merged images (lower right), are outlined in each panel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g002

The topology of mTERF22 protein shares structural similarities with mammalian mTERFs

mTERFs proteins are characterized by the repetition of about 30 amino acids region, termed as MTERF motif [27]. The presence and topology of MTERF and other conserved motifs in mTERF22 were analyzed and identified using the Web-based tools Conserved Domains Database (CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml, [68]) and Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, [69]). Alignment of mTERF7 was conducted with T-Coffee multiple sequence alignment server [71] and displayed using GeneDoc [72] with the conserved residue shading mode (see S1 Fig). According to the CDD and SMART servers, the sequence of mTERF22 protein contains seven MTERF motifs (i.e., amino acid regions 89–125, 125–156, 162–194, 199–229, 233–263, 268–298, 300–334), which are connected by short linker regions (Figs 1A and S2). To gain structural insights, we used the Protein homology/analogy recognition engine-2 (Phyre²) [73] to predict and generate models of the mTERF22 structure. Based on the Phyre² server, mTERF22 adopts a structure that shares similarity with the established folds of the mTERF1 and mTERF3 proteins of animals (S4 Fig; and [74–77]). The hypothetical 3D-structure of mTERF22 has as a solenoid fold, with various exposed basic surfaces that are postulated to function in nucleic-acid binding (S4 Fig). A similar architecture is also recognized in various transcription factors in eukaryotes [78].

Morphology of mTERF22 mutant-alleles

The Arabidopsis genome encodes 35 mTERF proteins, many of which are predicted to reside within the mitochondria or chloroplasts (see Table 1). These are expected to play important roles in organellar gene expression in plants, and hence to affect the biogenesis of the respiratory and/or photosynthetic machineries. To investigate the roles of mTERF22, we examined several T-DNA insertional lines available in The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR), which are affected in the At5g64950 gene-locus (i.e., SALK-032680, SAIL-1229 and SALK-133048, annotated here as mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3, respectively). PCR analysis and DNA sequencing confirmed the positions of the insertions within the coding region of mTERF22 in mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3 mutants (Figs 1A and S2).

A downregulation in the expression of factors required in mitochondrial gene expression in Arabidopsis may result with growth and developmental retardation phenotypes, and in some cases were shown to lead to the production of abnormal seed morphology (reviewed by e.g., [79]). Our characterization of Arabidopsis mutants affected in the expression of nuclear genes homologous to intron-encoded splicing cofactors in bacteria (i.e., nuclear-encoded maturases, or nmat), indicated that they affect the splicing of various mitochondrial genes [52, 60, 63, 80]. The seed morphology of nmat1, nmat2 and nmat4 mutants [52, 60, 63, 80, 81] resembled that of the wrinkled mutant [82]. Accordingly, the three nmat also exhibited lower germination and retarded growth phenotypes [52, 60, 63, 80]. Yet, morphologically, the homozygous mterf22-1, mterf22-2, mterf22-3 mutants were indistinguishable from the wild-type plants when they are grown under ‘standard’ growth conditions (i.e., 22°C, 16:8-hour long-day conditions, 150 μE m^-2 s^-1, 50% relative humidity) (Fig 3). Analyses of fully developed siliques from heterozygous lines (Fig 3A) and mature seeds obtained from homozygous mterf22 plant lines (Fig 3B) indicated the presence of only normal seeds in mterf22 mutants. Likewise, no obvious changes in germination rates (S4 Table), rosette size (Fig 3D and 3E) and flower morphology (Fig 3F) were seen between the mutants and wild-type plants, though the average weights of the mterf22 seedlings may be somewhat lower (about 10%) than that of the wild-type plants (Fig 3E). However, when are grown at 28°C (i.e., 16:8-hour long-day conditions, 150 μE m^-2 s^-1, 70% relative humidity) the mterf22 mutants show reduced germination rates (S4 Table) and altered root morphology (S5 Fig).

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 3. Plant phenotypes associated with mTERF22 mutations.

The effects of mTERF22-suppression on germination, growth phenotypes and development of Arabidopsis wild-type (Col-0) and mterf22 knockout lines (i.e., SALK-032680, SAIL-1229 and SALK-133048, annotated here as mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3 mutants, respectively). The morphologies of siliques (A) and seeds (B) obtained from wild-type (Col-0) and mterf22 mutant lines analyzed under a microscope. (C) Growth phenotypes associated with 3-week-old wild-type and homozygous mterf22 seedlings grown on MS-agar plates at 22°C. (D) Growth phenotypes associated with 7-week-old wild-type and mterf22 seedlings grown on soil at 22°C. (E) The averages of seedlings weights and rosette sizes of 3 week-old and 7 week-old (respectively) wild-type plants and mterf22 mutants. The values are means of three biological replicates with about 20 ~ 25 seedlings from each line in each batch. Error bars indicate one standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the wild-type and mterf22 mutant-lines, using Student’s paired t-test (P < 0.05). (F) Flower phenotypes of mterf22 mutants grown at 22°C under long-day conditions (i.e., 16:8-hour) at light intensity of ~150 μE m^-2 s^-1, with 50% relative humidity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g003

Homozygous mterf22 mutants exhibit mitochondrial biogenesis defects

To evaluate the impact of elevated ambient temperature conditions on mitochondria biogenesis and organellar gene expression, wild-type and mterf22 plants were germinated at 22°C and then transferred for four or five days at 28°C (unless indicated differently). The biogenesis of wild-type and mterf22 mitochondria was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in ultrathin sections obtained from young Arabidopsis seedlings (i.e., germinated at 22°C and then grown for 5 days at 28°C). The electron micrographs of wild-type mitochondria showed the characteristic internal cristae formation [52, 59, 60, 63], as dense folds of the inner-membrane sections (Fig 4). Many of the mitochondria in mterf22 mutants were less electron densed, and showed reduced inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) electron density, with less cristae organization and often had large internal spaces lacking any obvious IMM formation (Fig 4). One of the mitochondria in mterf22-3 was particularly elongated (Fig 4, lower panel). As this organellar phenotype was observed only in a single slide, we assume that the morphology of the elongated mitochondria in mterf22-3 corresponds to a fusion between two neighboring mitochondria, a phenomenon that is common to land-plants [83]. As Arabidopsis mutants affected in mitochondria gene expression also exhibit similar organellar morphologies (i.e., less developed cristae formation (see e.g., [52, 59, 60, 63]), we assume that the functions of mTERF22 are required for normal mitochondrial biogenesis.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 4. Mitochondria morphologies of Arabidopsis wild-type and mterf22 plants.

Transmission electron micrographs of ultrathin sections from the hypocotyl tissue of wild-type and mterf22-1 and mterf22-3 mutants. The right panels are magnified images of the micrographs presented in the left panel. Mitochondria are labeled by ‘M’, while ‘C’ indicates to chloroplasts. Bars represent 0.5 μm or 1.0 μm as indicated in each panel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g004

Depletion of mTERF22 leads to decreased transcript levels of many mitochondrial genes

The abnormal mitochondrial morphology and growth phenotypes associated with mterf22 mutants suggest that mTERF22 may functions in mitochondrial RNA metabolism. To address specific changes in the accumulation of various mitochondrial transcripts in mterf22 plants, we compared the RNA profiles of wild-type plants and mterf22 mutants. For this purpose, total RNA was extracted from 3-week-old Col-0, mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3 plants and the relative accumulation of different mitochondrial transcript in wild-type and mterf22 plants was examined by RT-qPCR analyses with specific oligonucleotides designed to different organellar transcripts (see e.g., [59–63]). Genes analyzed in these assays included most of the annotated genes in Arabidopsis mitochondria [84]. These include the complex I subunits nad1 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad2 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad3, nad4 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, nad4L, nad5 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad6, nad7 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, the nad9 subunit, the complex III cob subunit, the complex IV cox1, cox2 exons a-b and cox3 subunits, the ATP synthase (i.e., complex V) subunits atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8 and atp9, genes encoding the cytochrome c maturation (ccm) factors, ccmB, ccmC, ccmFn1, ccmFn2 and ccmFc exons a-b, the ribosomal subunits rpl2 exons a-b, rps3 exons a-b, rps4, rps7, rps12, rpl16, rrn26, and the mttB gene. The ratios of transcripts accumulation between wild-type plants and mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3 mutants were examined for each transcript and are indicated in Fig 5. Specific oligonucleotides are listed in S3 Table.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 5. Transcript abundance of mitochondrial mRNAs in Arabidopsis wild-type and mterf22 plants grown at 28°C.

The accumulation of various mtRNAs in wild-type and mterf22 plants grown at 28°C was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). Total RNA (depleted from DNA) was extracted from 3-week-old wild-type (Col-0) and mutant plants, reverse-transcribed, and the relative steady-state levels of different organellar transcripts were evaluated by qPCR with specific oligonucleotides, after normalization to the actin2 (At3g1878), 18S rRNA (At3g41768) and 26S rRNA (Atmg00020) genes (see S3 Table). The histogram shows the relative mRNAs levels in mutant lines versus those of wild-type plants (i.e., log2 ratios of mutant to wild-type mtRNAs). Transcripts analyzed in these assays include the NADH dehydrogenase (i.e., complex I) subunits nad1 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad2 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad3, nad4 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, nad4L, nad5 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, the intronless nad6 subunit, nad7 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, and nad9, the complex III cob subunit, cytochrome oxidase (complex IV) cox1, cox2 exons a-b and cox3 subunits, the ATP synthase (i.e., complex V) subunits atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8 and atp9, genes encoding the cytochrome c maturation (ccm) factors, ccmB, ccmC, ccmFn1, ccmFn2 and ccmFc exons a-b, the ribosomal subunits rpl2 exons a-b, rps3 exons a-b, rps4, rps7, rps12, rpl16, rrn26, and the mttB gene. The values are means of five biological replicates (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g005

Comparison of the RNA-profiles of wild-type and mterf22 plants by RT-qPCR indicated discrepancies in the steady-state levels of various mitochondrial transcripts in mterf22 mutants. Remarkably, these assays revealed to mild reductions (i.e., about x2 to x8 folds) in the accumulation of numerous mitochondrial transcripts in mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3 plants (Fig 5), strongly supporting a role for mTERF22 in the transcription, processing and/or stability of mitochondrial RNAs in Arabidopsis plants. Transcripts which their levels were reduced in the three mterf22 mutant lines corresponded to many genes which are interrupted by group II intron sequences in Arabidopsis mitochondria [85–87] (e.g., ccmFc, cox2, nad1, nad2, nad4, nad5, nad7 and rpl2), as well as to numerous other intronless organellar transcripts. Yet, the accumulation of mtRNAs related to ccmC, ccmFn1, rpl16, rps3 exons a-b, nad5 exons d-e and nad9, was not significantly affected in mterf22 (Fig 5).

Previously is was shown that at least two mTERF members function in the splicing of organellar-encoded group II introns in Arabidopsis plants (i.e., mTERF4 [35–37] and mTERF15 [44]). To test whether mTERF22 may also affect the maturation of various mitochondrial pre-mRNAs, we analyzed the splicing efficiencies of the 23 mitochondrial introns in Arabidopsis wild-type and mterf22 mutant plants [84]. The ratio of unspliced and mature transcripts in wild-type and mutant plants was examined for each transcript. Splicing defects were concluded in cases where the accumulation of a pre-mRNA was correlated with a notable reduction in the level of the corresponding mRNA transcript in both mutants. However, we assume that the functions of mTERF22 are not required for splicing as no significant changes in the ratios of pre-RNAs to mRNAs of the 23 group II introns were observed between mterf22 and wild-type plants (see S6 Fig).

Reduced transcripts levels in many mitochondrial genes in mterf22 may also relate to altered mtDNA copy numbers, as previously indicated for some mTERFs in animals [88, 89] or algae [49]. Quantification of mtDNA copy number by qPCR analyses indicated that numbers of mtDNAs was not significantly affected in mterf22-1 plants (S7 Fig). Taken together, these data indicate that mTREF22 affects the transcription or stability of many mitochondrial transcripts in Arabidopsis.

Arabidopsis mterf22 mutants are affected in mitochondrial transcription

RNA synthesis and post-transcriptional processes shape the transcriptomic landscapes of plant mitochondria [9, 16, 64]. To establish whether mTERF22 functions in the transcription of mitochondrial genes or affects their stabilities, the transcriptional activities in mterf22 were examined by run-on assays [64], using fresh mitochondria preparation obtained from wild-type and mutants plants. Intact mitochondria were incubated for 1 hour in the presence of a nucleotide mixture which consists of Biotin-14-CTP. Following the in organello run-on transcription assays, total mtRNA was isolated, separated on 1% agarose-gels and subjected to northern blotting with anti-biotin antibody. Relative mtRNA levels were measured by densitometry of RNA blots, and quantified using ImageJ software [90]. The results of the organellar run-on transcription assays indicated reduced de-novo transcription (~30% lower) in mterf22 mutants mitochondria (Fig 6A). For the analysis of the transcription rates of specific mtRNAs, gene-specific probes (about 150 bp; see S3 Table) were blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane, fixed by UV crosslinking and then hybridized with total mtRNAs obtained by the run-on assays. The relative accumulation of transcripts in wild-type plants and mterf22 mutants was measured by the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, version 5.1). The levels of de-novo transcribed RNAs corresponding to atp6, cox1, cox2, ccmFc, nad2, nad6 and rrn26 were about 30% to 40% lower than those seen in the wild-type plants. Less marked reductions in mtRNA levels were seen in the cases of rpl2 and rps4 (~15% lower), while the transcription rates of rps3 was not significantly affected in the mutant (Fig 6B). As significant amounts of mtRNAs are still observed in the mutants we conclude that mTERF22 is involved but is not essential for organellar transcription.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 6. Mitochondrial run-on transcription assays.

Mitochondria were prepared from 3-week-old MS-grown wild-type and mterf22 plants, and run-on reaction was performed by incubation with ATP, GTP, UTP and biotin-14-CTP [64]. Following 1 hour incubation, total biotinylated-mtRNA was obtained by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. (A) For the analyses of mtRNA transcription, total RNA (0.5, 1 and 2.5 μg) was separated on the 1% agarose gel and transferred to a charged nylon membrane, as previously described (Keren et al. 2011). The accumulation of various mitochondrial transcripts was estimated by measuring the signals in wild-type versus mutant plants, using the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, version 5.1). (B) Analysis of the transcription rates of specific mitochondrial genes was performed by the hybridization of the biotinylated-mtRNAs, extracted from wild-type and mterf22-1 plants, with specific mtDNA gene probes (about 150 nts in length; S3 Table) immobilized onto charged nylon membranes, according to the method described by Kühn 2015 [64]. Following membrane hybridization and washes, detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase conjugated antibodies. The steady-state levels of various mitochondrial transcripts, as indicated in each blot, were analyzed the relative signals (i.e., mutant to wild-type ratios) in each blot, using the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, version 5.1). The values are means of two biological replicates (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g006

The RNA profiles and run-on experiments may indicate to functional redundancy, where various transcription factors are compensating for one another (see e.g., [91]). Based on phylogenetic analyses of the mTERF family in plants (S8A Fig and [28, 29, 46]), mTERF7 (At5g07900) and mTERF27 (At1g21150) are closely related to mTERF22. These also share a significant sequence homology with mTERF22 protein (i.e., 22% and 24% identity, respectively; S8B Fig) and are both predicted to reside within the mitochondria in plants (Table 1). It seems possible, therefore, that mTERF7 and mTERF27 (as well as other transcription factors) may have redundant functions with mTERF22 in the transcription of mitochondrial genes in Arabidopsis. However, such speculations should be considered with care. Genetic and biochemical data are required to clarify the roles of additional mTERF members in mtRNA metabolism in flowering-plants.

mterf22 mutants show mild reductions in the accumulation of different respiratory complexes

The mtRNA profiles associated with mterf22 mutants are expected to affect the biogenesis of the respiratory machinery (see e.g., [59, 60, 63, 92]). Accordingly, the translation rates of various plastidial proteins in land-plants were recently shown to be associated with the abundances of their corresponding mRNAs [93]. The accumulation of various mitochondrial proteins in wild-type plants and mterf22 mutants was studied by immunoblot assays with antibodies raised against different organellar proteins (see S2 Table). These including the complex I (C-I) subunits CA2 (γ-type carbonic anhydrase-like subunit 2) [94] and Nad9 [95], the Rieske iron-sulfur protein (RISP) of complex III (C-III) [96], the cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) of complex IV (C-IV), the AtpA subunit of the ATP-synthase enzyme (C-V), the SHMT (serine-hydroxymethyltransferase) protein and the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC). These analyses indicated mild reductions (i.e., about 30% to 40%) in the steady-state levels of different mitochondrial proteins, including AtpA, Cox2, Nad9 and RISP (Fig 7A), while the accumulation of CA2, SHMT and VDAC was affected to a lesser degree (2%, 12% and 23% reduced protein signals, respectively) in mterf22-1 mutants.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 7. Relative accumulation of organellar proteins in wild-type and mterf22 plants.

(A) Immunoblot analyses of wild-type plants and mterf22-1 mutant line. For the quantification of the relative abundances of organellar proteins in mterf22 plants, different amounts of total mitochondrial proteins extracted from wild-type plants were loaded and separated by SDS-PAGE. The blots were probed with polyclonal antibodies raised to different organellar proteins, as indicated in each panel. Detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assays after incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. (B) BN-PAGE of crude mitochondria preparations was performed according to the method described in [57]. Crude mitochondria preparations, obtained from 3-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings, were solubilized with DDM [1.5% (w/v)] and the organellar complexes were resolved by BN-PAGE. For immunodetection, proteins were transferred from the native gels onto a PVDF membrane and were probed with specific antibodies (S2 Table), as indicated below each blot. Arrows indicate to the native complexes I (~1,000 kDa), III (dimer, ~500 kDa), IV (~220 kDa) and V (~600 kDa). The asterisk in the CA2 panel indicates to the presence of a 700 ~ 800 kDa band, which may corresponds to a complex I assembly intermediate. Hybridization signals were analyzed by chemiluminescence assays after incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. The intensities of protein signals in panels ‘A’ and ‘B’ using ImageJ software [90].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g007

We further investigated the biogenesis of the respiratory complexes I, III, IV and V, using BN-PAGEs followed by immunoblot analyses (Fig 7B). The BN-PAGE/immunoblot analyses indicated small reductions (about 25% to 30%) in the levels of native holo-complexes corresponding to C-I, C-III, C-IV and C-V in mterf22-1 mutant (Fig 7B). We also noticed the presence of a lower molecular weight particle (calculated mass of 700 ~ 800 kDa) corresponding to CA2 protein in mterf22-1 mitochondria (Fig 7B, and [94]). This protein band (Fig 7B, marked with an asterisk) likely corresponds to a complex I assembly intermediate, as indicated in various Arabidopsis mutants affected in mitochondria gene expression (see e.g., [60, 97–99]). No significant changes in the levels of the chloroplast Rubisco enzyme were seen between the wild-type and mterf22-1 plants (Fig 7B).

Arabidopsis mterf22 plants display altered respiratory functions

Altered mitochondria morphology and reduced organellar RNA and protein levels in mterf22 mutants indicate that the functions of mTERF22 are required during mitochondria biogenesis. To determine whether the respiratory activity was also affected in mterf22 mutants, we monitored the O₂-uptake rates of 3-week-old wild-type and mterf22 plants in the dark, using a Clark-type electrode (Fig 8). The average O₂-uptake rates of wild-type plants was 104.65 ± 10.18 nmol O₂ min^-1 gFW^-1. The O₂-uptake rates of mterf22-1 and mterf22-2 (i.e., 123.74 ± 18.47 and 120.92 ± 14.13 nmol O₂ min^-1 gFW^-1, respectively) were found to be somewhat higher than that of the wild-type plants. Inhibition of complex I activity by 50 μM rotenone (+ROT) had a stronger effect on the average O₂-upatke rates of wild-type plants (i.e. ~23% inhibition), than on the respiratory activity of mterf22 plants (i.e., 15% to 19% inhibition) (Fig 8). Similarly, potassium cyanide (+KCN), which specifically inhibits electrons transport through complex IV, may have a stronger effect on the respiration of wild-type plants (~60% reduction in O₂-uptake rates) than on mterf22 mutant-lines (55% and 59% inhibition in mterf22-1 and mterf22-2, respectively). However, these assumptions should be considered with care as these mild differences in the respiratory activities between the wild-type and mterf22 seedlings are not statistically significant.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Fig 8. Respiration activities in wild-type and mterf22 mutants.

O₂-uptake rates of wild-type plants and mterf22 mutants (i.e., mterf22-1 and mterf22-2) were analyzed with a Clark-type electrode as described previously [60]. For each assay, equal weights (i.e. 100 mg) of 3-week-old MS-grown Arabidopsis seedlings were submerged in ~2.5 mL sterilized water and applied to the electrode in a sealed glass chamber in the dark. O₂-uptake rates were measured in the absence (Control) or in presence of rotenone (+ROT, 50 μM) and KCN (1 mM) which inhibit complexes I and IV activities (respectively). The values are means of four biological replicates with about 25 seedlings (i.e., 3-week-old) from each line in each batch. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201631.g008

The increases in the O₂-uptake rates of mterf22 mutants (i.e., about 20% higher than the wild-type plants, Fig 8) may correspond to induction of various alternative electron transport pathways in mterf22-1 (i.e., type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases, NDs, and alternative oxidases, AOXs), which can bypass the respiration through C-I and C-IV [100–102]. To test this, the expression of various mitochondrial NDs (i.e., NDA1, NDA2, NDB1, NDB2, NDB3, NDB4 and NDC1) and AOXs (i.e., AOX1A, AOX1B, AOX1C, AOX1D and AOX2) was estimated by quantitative RT-PCR. The data revealed to increases in the levels of mRNAs corresponding to both AOX1D and NDA2 in mterf22 mutants (about 4.5x and 6.0x, respectively; S9 Fig). Accumulation of mRNA was also apparent in the cases of AOX1A, AOX1B, NDA1 and NDB1 (about 2x ~ 3x higher), while the levels of mRNA transcripts corresponding to AOX1C and AOX2 were found similar in the wild-type and mutant plants (S9 Fig). Under the experimental conditions, the expression of NDB2, NDB3, NDB4 and NDC1 was below detectable levels in wild-type and mterf22-1 plants.

The mTERF22 (At5g64950) locus encodes a mitochondrial transcription related factor

The regulation of mtDNA expression is key for controlling the OXPHOS capacity during plant development and in response to various physiological demands. The biogenesis and the regulation of mitochondria gene expression depend upon the activities of numerous nuclear-encoded protein cofactors, which also have the ability to link mitochondrial functions with developmental or environmental signals. However, the identity and functions of mitochondrial transcription factors in plants remain largely unknown. Proteins containing the mTERF domain [27] were found to play important roles in organelle biogenesis in both animals and plants [28, 29, 31, 32]. Interestingly, the mTERF family has been largely extended in angiosperms, however, specific functions have been assigned to only a small number of these proteins. Here, we analyzed the roles of mTERF22 (At5g64950), considering the importance of mTERF proteins in organellar gene expression and RNA metabolism in eukaryotes. GFP localization analyses indicated that mTERF22 resides within the mitochondria in Arabidopsis (Figs 2 and S3, and [28]). Based on microarray datasets, mTERF22 gene is expressed at low levels in different tissues throughout the plant development (S2 Fig). Analysis of At5g64950 topology indicates that mTERF22 harbors seven repeats of the MTERF domain (Figs 1, S2 and [28]), and may adopts an architecture (i.e., solenoid fold) (S4 Fig) that is structurally related to DNA binding proteins [103].

mTERF22 is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial gene-transcription in Arabidopsis plants

To analyze the putative roles of mTERF22 in mitochondria gene expression, we examined the growth phenotypes and organellar activities associated with several mutant (T-DNA) lines affected in the At5g64950 gene-locus (i.e., mterf22-1, mterf22-2 and mterf22-3; Figs 1 and S2). Under optimal growth conditions (i.e., 22°C) the phenotypes of mterf22 mutants are generally comparable with those of wild-type plants, but some mild changes in germination rates and seedling development (e.g., shorter roots) are notable when the plants are grown under higher temperatures (i.e., at 28°C; see Fig 3, S4 Table and S5 Fig). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) further indicated altered mitochondria morphology with less cristae organization in mterf22 plants (Fig 4). The abnormal morphologies of mterf22 mutants are correlated with altered transcription of many of the organellar genes in mterf22 mutants (Fig 5). Genes which their expression is affected (i.e., reduced mRNA steady-state levels) in mterf22 include atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8, atp9, ccmB, ccmFc exons a-b, ccmFn2, cob, cox1, cox2 exons a-b, cox3, mttB, nad1 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad2 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, nad3, nad4 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, nad4L, nad5 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, nad6, nad7 exons a-b, b-c, c-d, d-e, rpl2 exons a-b, rps4, rps7, rps12 and rrn26. The reduced mRNA levels suggest to altered transcription in mterf22, as also indicated by the run-on assays (Fig 6). However, while de-novo organellar transcription was reduced by about 30~50% in mterf22 mitochondria, the steady-state levels of many mtRNAs were about 4 to 8 times lower in the mutants, in vivo. These differences may indicate that altered organellar transcription can also affect the stability or processing of various mtRNAs in mterf22 mutants.

While the levels of many organellar transcripts is reduced in mterf22 mutants, the expression of several other genes, including ccmC, ccmFn1, rpl16, rps3 exons a-b, nad5 exons d-e and nad9 transcripts, was not significantly affected in the mutants. RNA-seq data suggest that nad9-nad5de-rps3-rpl16 and ccmC-ccmFn1 may be polycistronically expressed (S10 Fig). If true, the transcription of these gene clusters may rely upon transcription factors other than mTERF22. In support of this view, the transcription of rps3 gene was not significantly affected in mterf22 mutants (Fig 6). Genetic and biochemical data led to the identification and characterization of many promoter regions in plant mitochondria [17, 24, 104, 105]. Some of the promoter regions contain short sequence motifs, as the YRTA sequence, which may control transcription initiation in plant mitochondria [17, 24, 104, 106]. However, a comparative sequence analyses of the upstream regions of predicted polycistronic units in Arabidopsis mitochondria (S10 Fig) failed to indicate common sequence motifs that could explain the differences in gene expression seen in mterf22. It was previously noted that RpoTm could accurately initiate organellar transcription of many promoter regions in the absence of auxiliary factors, in vitro. However, it remains possible that for efficient transcription in vivo, RpoTm relies on the activities of various transcription factors, which may stabilize open promoter complexes or assist with the release of the polymerase following RNA synthesis [24]. Biochemical analysis of mTERF22 binding to different promoter regions and its possible association to RpoTm would be required to test this intriguing hypothesis.

Mutations in mTERF22 lead to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation defects

The respiratory machinery is composed of four major electron transport complexes (C-I to C-IV) and the ATP synthase (also denoted as C-V), which are required for cell respiration and aerobic energy production [102, 107]. The biogenesis of the respiratory machinery depends upon a concerted expression of both nuclear- and organellar-encoded subunits [10, 13, 102]. Altered transcription in mterf22 (Figs 4 and 5) may affect the organellar translation and thereby to alter respiratory-mediated functions. While many organellar transcripts were reduced by about 4 to 8 folds in mterf22, proteomic studies indicated to only mild reductions in the accumulation of various organellar proteins (Fig 7A) in mterf22. Regulation of gene transcription is key to gene expression response. While the translation of some proteins fine‐tune the transcription levels, the steady-state levels of many other proteins poorly correlate with the levels of their corresponding mRNAs [108–110]. Accordingly, the biogenesis of the respiratory machinery was only mildly affected (Figs 7 and 8) in the mutants. Small increases in the O₂-uptake rates of the mutants (Fig 8) may correspond to the induction of the alternative respiratory pathway in mterf22 (i.e., higher AOX1D and NDA2 transcript levels, S10 Fig).

The phenotypes of mterf22 mutants

Our data indicate that the mterf22 mutants are able to grow, flower and set viable seeds. Under the optimum growth temperature range for Arabidopsis (i.e., 22~23°C; ABRC, https://abrc.osu.edu/), the homozygous mterf22 lines exhibit normal phenotypes, although some growth and developmental defects (i.e., reduced germination and short root phenotypes) can be observed when the plants are grown at 28°C (Figs 3 and S5). We assume that these phenotypes correspond to reduced plant fitness under the stress conditions, as the global mtRNA profiles of mterf22 mutants grown at 22°C (see S11 Fig) are similar to those of the mutant plants grown at 28°C (Fig 5). In light of the expected significance of mitochondria function to plant physiology, why does the loss of mTERF22 cause such little phenotypic effects? Currently, we cannot provide a definitive explanation, but we speculate that the lack of strong phenotypes, associated with mterf22 mutants, are the consequences of redundant functions between different transcription factors that may exist in plant mitochondria. These may involve other mTERFs (e.g., mTERF7 and mTERF27), which are phylogenetically related and share significant sequence similarity with mTERF22 (S8 Fig), or any other transcription factors still awaiting their functional characterization. This assumption is strongly supported by the fact that the mutations in mTERF22 gene have not abolish the transcription in mterf22 mutants (Figs 5 and 6). RT-qPCR analyses indicate that the mRNA levels of mTERF7 or mTERF27 was not significantly changed in mterf22 mutants (S12 Fig), however, these proteins may be upregulated in their expression or activities in the mterf22 mutants.

Conclusions

Mitochondria play pivotal roles in cellular energy metabolism. Specific changes in the rates of respiration are required to meet alterations in energy demands during particular stages in plant growth and development, or under different environmental conditions. The regulation of organellar biogenesis and activity is mediated by numerous nuclear-encoded cofactors that await to be deciphered. The roles of mTERF proteins in the regulation of mitochondria gene expression in plants is particularly relevant because they have been implicated in organellar transcription, translation and DNA replication in different eukaryotes. Our work indicates that mTERF22 is involved in mtDNA transcription in Arabidopsis. Mutants in mTERF22 gene-locus are only partially affected in the biogenesis of the respiratory machinery and exhibit normal phenotypes under optimal growth conditions (i.e., at 22°C), but seem to show some mild defects in growth and developmental under mild stress conditions (i.e., at 28°C). These data coincide with lower steady-state levels of many mtRNAs in mterf22 mutants. We speculate that these phenotypes may be due to functional redundancies between mTERF22 and other transcription factors in Arabidopsis mitochondria. The examination of this hypothesis would require the establishment of mutants affected in different mTERFs. Studies are under way in our laboratory to investigate the roles of mitochondrial mTERFs in Arabidopsis.