Advertisement
Research Article

Androgens Increase lws Opsin Expression and Red Sensitivity in Male Three-Spined Sticklebacks

  • Yi Ta Shao,

    Affiliations: Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, Sensory Physiology Laboratory, Marine Research Station, Academia Sinica, I-lain, Taiwan

    X
  • Feng-Yu Wang,

    Affiliation: Taiwan Ocean Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    X
  • Wen-Chun Fu,

    Affiliation: Sensory Physiology Laboratory, Marine Research Station, Academia Sinica, I-lain, Taiwan

    X
  • Hong Young Yan equal contributor mail,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Hong Young Yan, Bertil Borg

    bertil.borg@zoologi.su.se (BB); hyyan@gate.sinica.edu.tw (HYY)

    Affiliations: Sensory Physiology Laboratory, Marine Research Station, Academia Sinica, I-lain, Taiwan, Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany

    X
  • Kazuhiko Anraku,

    Affiliation: Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan

    X
  • I-Shiung Chen,

    Affiliation: Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan

    X
  • Bertil Borg equal contributor mail

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Hong Young Yan, Bertil Borg

    bertil.borg@zoologi.su.se (BB); hyyan@gate.sinica.edu.tw (HYY)

    Affiliation: Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    X
  • Published: June 25, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100330

Abstract

Optomotor studies have shown that three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) are more sensitive to red during summer than winter, which may be related to the need to detect the red breeding colour of males. This study aimed to determine whether this change of red light sensitivity is specifically related to reproductive physiology. The mRNA levels of opsin genes were examined in the retinae of sexually mature and immature fish, as well as in sham-operated males, castrated control males, or castrated males implanted with androgen 11-ketoandrostenedione (11 KA), maintained under stimulatory (L16:D8) or inhibitory (L8:D16) photoperiods. In both sexes, red-sensitive opsin gene (lws) mRNA levels were higher in sexually mature than in immature fish. Under L16:D8, lws mRNA levels were higher in intact than in castrated males, and were up-regulated by 11 KA treatment in castrated males. Moreover, electroretinogram data confirmed that sexual maturation resulted in higher relative red spectral sensitivity. Mature males under L16:D8 were more sensitive to red light than males under L8:D16. Red light sensitivity under L16:D8 was diminished by castration, but increased by 11 KA treatment. Thus, in sexually mature male sticklebacks, androgen is a key factor in enhancing sensitivity to red light via regulation of opsin gene expression. This is the first study to demonstrate that sex hormones can regulate spectral vision sensitivity.

Introduction

Sexual selection requires the ability to not only find/attract a partner, but also to discern a partner of high quality [1]. Partners are located and attracted via various sensory systems. One or both potential partners emit signals, which can include pheromones, mating calls, or breeding colours. One or both partners recognize and react to the signals using the appropriate sensory system, such as olfaction, hearing, or vision [2]. All other things being equal, the more successful an organism is at sending and/or receiving signals, the more successful it will be at attracting/choosing partners of high quality and/or in high quantity, and thus at disseminating its genes [2]. Sexual selection theory predicts a tight coupling between the evolution of sexual displays and the sensory capabilities of the receiver [1], [3]. Mating signals can be as important for rivals as they are for potential mates [4], [5]. For example, it is important for territorial males to be able to detect the presence of competitors [6], [7].

Generally, sexual signalling changes dramatically with season and state of maturity. Calling attention to oneself outside the breeding season is a waste of energy and can also attract potential predators [8]; seasonal changes in pheromone-detection ability and olfaction sensitivity over the reproductive cycle have been observed in mammals, birds, and teleosts [9][11], but such seasonal shifts in the visual system are less well-documented.

The three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, is a well-studied model of reproductive behaviour in fish. A prominent male secondary sexual characteristic is the breeding colour, including blue eyes and a red belly [12]. In nature, the breeding season occurs from late spring to early summer when the photoperiod is long. Many studies have demonstrated that the red colouration is used to attract females [13], and it may be an important signal to competitors as well. It has been often stated that the red belly is a stimulus for male aggressiveness in three-spined sticklebacks. However, the actual data are contradictory, and the majority of studies show no increase in attacks on red models [6]. Nevertheless, it can be predicted that males with a greater ability to detect red light will be more aware of other breeding males, allowing them to react appropriately to competitors.

Using optomotor tests, Cronly-Dillon and Sharma [14] observed higher behavioural red light sensitivity (594 nm), but lower green light sensitivity (516 nm), during summer than during winter in female sticklebacks, but no such differences in males. In contrast, a recent study using an improved optomotor apparatus reported an increase in red light sensitivity (620 nm) in the summer in both sexes [4]. An increase in red light sensitivity in summer does not necessarily indicate a direct role in reproductive physiology; rather, it may be an adaptation to the changing photic environment. In many areas, sticklebacks live in the open sea in winter [15] and migrate to the coast or into freshwater in spring to spawn.

The visual system of fish is composed of photoreceptors, which contain an opsin protein and a light-sensitive chromophore (a vitamin A derivative). There are four major classes of cone opsins, i.e. SWS1, SWS2, RH2, and LWS, and one rod opsin, RH1 [16]. When combined with the chromophore, these opsins form visual pigments with absorbance maxima (λmax) in various wavelength regions of the spectrum [16][19]. Microspectrophotometry has been used to reveal that sticklebacks possess one class of rod receptor (λmax range: 507–531 nm) and the following four classes of cone photoreceptors: ultraviolet single cones (λmax range: 365–379 nm), blue single cones (λmax range: 434–460 nm), green/red double cones (λmax range: 514–547 nm/566–618 nm), and red/red double cones [18]. Sticklebacks from dystrophic, red light-shifted lakes with visual pigments based on the vitamin A2 chromophore had spectra that were broader and shifted toward longer wavelengths, as compared to ocean (clear water) equivalents with A1-based visual pigments [18]. More clear-cut differences were observed in opsin expression between sticklebacks from clear (ocean and lake) and dystrophic water. Fish from clear waters possess double cones with both LWS and RH2 opsins, one per double cone member. In contrast, fish from red-shifted lakes possess double cones, which are primarily LWS/LWS pairs [18]. In teleosts, both A1/A2 chromophore and opsin gene expression may change at different life stages or seasons, and this may be related to the endocrine system [19][23].

Both androgen [24] and oestrogen [25] receptors have been found in the retinae of teleosts, including androgen receptor-β (ARβ) in sticklebacks [26], albeit at low levels. Androgens are well known to stimulate male secondary characteristics and breeding behaviour in the male stickleback [27], and circulating androgen levels peak in the breeding season in both male (mostly 11-ketotestosterone) and female (mostly testosterone) sticklebacks [28]. Therefore, it is possible that androgen and oestrogen act on receptors in the eyes, thereby modulating visual sensitivity and affecting vision-associated reproductive behaviours during the breeding season.

The aim of the present study was to find out whether changes in red light sensitivity in the stickleback are specifically related to reproductive physiology. Male sticklebacks were gonadectomised (this operation could not be performed on females), and the effects of treatment with the androgen 11-ketotestosterone (11 KA) on opsin mRNA expression and spectral sensitivity (as determined using electroretinogram, ERG) were examined.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals

Three-spined sticklebacks were caught at the shore of the Öresund and southern Baltic at the coast of Skåne, south Sweden. Sticklebacks also spawn along these coasts. Three-spined sticklebacks are not a protected or endangered species, and specific permission is not required to collect them. Fish were transported to Stockholm University, after collection on the following dates at the indicated locations (GPS coordinates are given in parentheses): Nov 27th–28th 2011 at Skåre (55° 22′ 32.7″ N; 13° 03′ 12.3″ E) and Skanör (55° 24′ 58.1″ N; 12° 49′ 49.6″ E); Feb 24th 2012 at Vikhög (55° 43′ 42.2″ N; 12° 57′ 25.6″ E); and Dec 16th 2012 at Skåre. Based on their size and the season, it was deemed likely that most of the fish had not spawned previously. The animals were housed in 700 or 1200 L aquaria containing clear artificial brackish water (0.5% salinity), which was aerated and filtered, at a density of 0.6 fish/L or less. The aquaria were illuminated by fluorescent tubes, and the light intensity at the water surface was around 100–200 lux. The bottom was covered with sand, and ceramic pots and tubes provided hiding places. All fish were fed primarily on frozen bloodworms, but also with mysids and/or Artemia as a carotenoid supplement. Before the experiments, fish were kept at 20°C under a non-stimulatory short day (L8:D16 or initially shorter) photoperiod. For each experiment, all fish were treated identically prior to treatment.

Four sets of experiments were performed. Fish caught in Nov 2011 were used in experiments 1 and 3 and the fish caught in Feb 2012 and Dec 2012 were used in experiments 2 and 4, respectively. Treatments and sample sizes for each experiment are shown in Table 1.

thumbnail

Table 1. Experimental treatments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.t001

Experiments 1–3 were performed with the permission of the Stockholm Northern Animal Experiment Ethical Committee (N 174/11). Experiment 4, which was conducted in Taiwan, was performed with permission (RFiZOOYH20060701) from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Academia Sinica.

Experiment 1. Sexually mature and immature fish

Male and female sticklebacks were moved to 200 L aquaria and kept under long day (L16:D8) or short day photoperiods (L8:D16) for 28 or 32 days, respectively. At the end of the experiment (Apr 17th 2012 for males, May 11th 2012 for females) most of the fish kept under long day conditions had matured, whereas all fish kept under short day conditions remained immature. Males that showed breeding colours, i.e. blue irises and a bright red belly [12], were selected for retinae dissection. Sexually mature females were identified by their positive reaction [29] to the mating dances of a nesting male in a 50 L aquarium. Fish maintained under a short day (L8:D16) photoperiod at 20°C all remained immature.

Experiment 2. Gonadectomy under long photoperiod

On May 21st 2012, sexually immature fish were anaesthetized with 0.025% buffered MS-222 (Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate, methanesulfonic acid salt), and gonadectomies were performed by making ca. 1.5 mm long incisions into the abdominal cavity on each side, and excising the testes with fine forceps. Sham-operations were performed similarly, but the testes were not removed. The incisions were closed with BV-2 (0.4 Ph. Eur) sutures. After surgery, the fish were maintained under L16:D8 in a 700 L aquarium and dissected after 28 days.

Experiment 3. Castration and androgen treatment

Implants (5 mm in length) were made from medical grade Silastic tubes (inner diameter (ID): 0.64 mm; outer diameter (OD): 1.19 mm), filled with crystalline 11 KA (4-androstene-3,11,17-trione; Sigma), and sealed with silicone glue. The hormone 11 KA is a non-aromatisable androgen, which is converted outside of the testes to 11-ketotestosterone (11 KT) in fish. In a previous study [30], similar 11 KA implants increased plasma 11 KT levels in castrated male sticklebacks to c. 225 ng/mL, slightly lower than levels observed in breeding, nesting males (c. 300 ng/mL). Empty implants were used as controls.

After surgery, the males were maintained under long or short day photoperiods in 200 L aquaria, and dissected after 28 days between May 23rd–26th. In earlier studies, changes in opsin expression occurred after even shorter periods (c. 3 weeks) of treatment in three-spined stickleback, salmonids, and goldfish [18], [31], [32].

Experiment 4. Electroretinogram (ERG) recording

Fish were sent by airfreight to Taiwan in July 2013. After arrival, males were kept under a short day photoperiod at 20°C for 2 weeks before experimental treatments. All operations were performed as described above. Five castrated males, 5 castrated males with 11 KA implants, and 5 sham-operated fish were maintained separately in 30 L aquaria under a long day photoperiod at 20°C for 28 days. Five sham-operated males were kept under short day conditions.

Light-adapted fish were immobilized by injection of gallamine triethiodide (Flaxedil; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo. USA.), a neuromuscular junction blocking agent, into the dorsal muscle (0.4–0.6 µg per gram of body weight) after being anaesthetized with MS-222. Treated fish were wrapped in wet KimWipes (Kimberley-Clark Taiwan, Taipei) to prevent scraping or drying of the skin. Small pieces of wet KimWipes were used to cover the edges of the eye, to keep it wet without blocking the pupil. A small tube inserted into the mouth was used to irrigate the gills with oxygenated water during the recordings. Immobilized fish were kept under diffuse white background light (c. 12 lx) [33] for 1 hr before the ERG test. The rationale for using light-adapted fish was to obtain results comparable with data obtained from optomotor studies [4], [14].

ERG tests were performed as described previously [33], [34]. A 100 W halogen lamp (Osram 64637 100 W/12 V) was used as the light source in a lamp housing device (Nikon C-FI 115, Japan). Nine narrow bandpass filters (Asahi Spectra, Japan) provided light stimuli at wavelengths of 400, 440, 460, 480, 500, 520, 560, 600, and 670 nm. The full width at half maximum of the bandpass filters was 10±2 nm (400–560 nm) or 12±2 nm (600 and 670 nm). A series of neutral density (ND) filters (Andover, NH, USA) were used to reduce the light intensity in 0.3 log unit steps, from −0.3 to −4.8 log units (Fig. S1). Peak photon fluxes at each wavelength were determined using a USB 2000 spectrometer (Ocean Optics, USA), calibrated by LC-1-cal (Ocean Optics, USA) with OODBase32 software (Ocean Optics, USA), at the fish eye. A shutter (Sutter Instrument Lambda SC, USA) was used to provide fixed durations of light stimuli (10 stimuli, each of 20 ms in duration, with an inter-stimuli interval of 5 s) in a diffuse white background (12 lx) [33], i.e., under a light-adapted condition. The ERG tests started from the lowest light stimuli, and ND filters were adjusted step-by-step to increase stimuli intensity (15 steps to reach the maximum). ERG signals were recorded using Teflon-coated insulated silver electrodes (63.5 µm in diameter) with exposed chlorinated tips. The recording electrode was positioned on the cornea and the reference electrode was placed on the head. The signals from both electrodes were amplified 20 k-fold and filtered by a high-low band pass filter set between 1 and 3000 Hz (ER-1, Cygnus Technology Inc. USA). The signals were digitized at a 2 kHz sampling rate with PowerLab 4/25 (ADInstruments, Inc. ML845, Australia), and recorded with Scope 3 data acquisition software (ADInstruments, Inc. Australia).

The recorded signals were analyzed using custom-made software (programmed by K. Anraku). Signals recorded at each step (100–700 ms after stimuli) were compared to the model ERG trace obtained at maximum light stimuli using the correlation method (Fig. 1). The replicates of waveforms from each test were compared using the Spearman correlation test. Our pilot study revealed that when a correlation coefficient (r) between two replicates was less than 0.7, the two ERG traces showed little resemblance. Hence, ERG traces were considered valid when r was greater than 0.7, and the b-wave time delay was less than 100 ms [34]. Deflection of the ERG trace was taken as an indication of the light intensity threshold of the particular wavelength [33]. Sensitivity was defined as –log10 of the threshold for each test wavelength. To remove variations between tests, values for each fish were normalized to a 0–100% scale, where 100% indicated the maximum sensitivity spectrum [35].

thumbnail

Figure 1. ERG traces of sticklebacks.

Typical ERG traces taken from maximum light stimuli (step 15) for each spectrum. Three repeats are shown. Open arrows indicate the stimuli and solid arrows indicate the presence of b-waves.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g001

Dissection

The fish were dissected at around 1 pm to 3 pm, which was during the middle of the day time for both photoperiods. All fish were euthanized with 0.025% buffered MS-222 solution before dissection under a stereomicroscope. Body, ovary, and kidney weight were measured, and the presence of breeding colours was noted. Kidney weight was used as an indicator for male maturation, as the kidneys of breeding male sticklebacks undergo hypertrophy upon androgen stimulation, and begin to produce the protein spiggin [36] for use in nest-building. The Gonad-Somatic Index (GSI) and Kidney-Somatic Index (KSI) were calculated as (organ weight/body weight) *100. All castrations were found to be complete (no remnants) and all implanted capsules were present. Retinae were removed from eyes and immersed in 500 µl RNAlater (Ambion) on ice for 2 hours, before being stored at −80°C until further analyses.

Retinal RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen cat. 74804) and reverse transcribed using Super-Script III (Invitrogen cat. 18080-400), according to the respective manufacturer's protocols. Possible genomic DNA contamination was removed by treating RNA samples with DNase (2 U) from the TURBO DNA-free kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion).

PCR

The whole genome sequence of three-spined stickleback has been published on the UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Site, and five retinal opsin genes, rh1, rh2, sws1, sws2, and lws, were identified by gene prediction. Gene-specific primers (Table 2) were designed based on the predicted genomic opsin sequences, and were used to amplify the opsin genes from the retinal cDNA of three-spined stickleback. The PCR products were obtained using Fast-Run Taq Master Mix (Protech Technology Enterprise Co., Taiwan) in 20 µl reactions, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended reaction concentrations. Each reaction was performed using an ABI Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) and the following steps: 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 50°C for 40 sec, extension at 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were then purified using the Qiagen purification kit, subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega; Madison, WI), sequenced, and identified. The sequences of opsin genes were uploaded to the NCBI database: rh1 (NCBI: KC774627), rh2 (NCBI: KC774624), sws1 (NCBI: KC774626), sws2 (NCBI: KC774625), and lws (NCBI: KC774623).

thumbnail

Table 2. Sequences of the primers used for PCR and q-PCR.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.t002

q-PCR

The specific primers designed for q-PCR were based on the sequences identified by PCR. The amplification efficiency and melting curve of each q-PCR primer pair was tested by 10-fold serial dilutions of the templates (100 pg to 100 ng), with 3 replicates for each gene and sample. Each reaction contained 40 ng of cDNA, 50 nM of each primer (Table 2), and LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche) in a final volume of 10 µl. Each reaction was performed using a Roche LightCycler 480 System (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) with the following steps: 1 cycle of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. PCR products were subjected to a melting-curve analysis, and representative samples were electrophoresed to verify that only a single product was present. Control reactions were conducted with RNA-free water to determine background levels. Three replicates were performed for each gene/sample.

Expression of each opsin gene was normalized against that of the β-actin reference gene, or determined as a fraction of the total cone opsin gene expression in an individual following the equation of Carleton and Kocher (2001) [37], which has been modified in Fuller et al. (2004) [38] and Spady et al. (2006) [39].
where Ti/Tall is the relative gene expression ratio for a given gene normalized by total cone opsin gene expression, Ei is the PCR efficiency for each pair of primers, and Cti is the critical cycle number for each gene. Proportional opsin mRNA levels are given as percentages of total cone opsin gene expression.

Statistics

Data were analysed using SPSS v. 14. Data from two groups were compared by performing the Shapiro-Wilk normality test (p>0.05), followed by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Multiple group comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc analysis with Tukey’s test, i.e. exp. 3. Moreover, two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effects of multiple factors on the opsin mRNA levels in exp. 1 and 3.

Results

General

Castrated males were observed to have lower body weights than sham-operated males (exp. 2, 3, and 4), but otherwise no significant differences in body weight were observed between experimental groups of the same sex (Table 1). The KSI and GSI values were higher in sexually mature than in immature fish, for both males and females (exp. 1). Most sham-operated males kept under long day conditions exhibited clear breeding colours, and higher KSIs than castrated males (exp. 2, 3 and 4). However, neither sham-operated nor castrated control males displayed breeding colours under short day conditions (exp. 3). Under both long and short day conditions, 12 of 15 of the castrated males treated with 11 KA exhibited breeding colours; furthermore, the KSIs of castrated fish treated with 11 KA were higher than those of castrated control fish (exp. 3 and 4; Table 1), and KSIs were slightly higher in the former maintained under long photoperiods than equivalents under short photoperiods (p = 0.05).

Opsin mRNA levels

In exp. 1, levels of lws mRNA (relative to β-actin) were significantly higher in sexually mature than in immature fish, in both females (Fig. 2a) and males (Fig. 3a). Relative rh2 mRNA levels were higher in immature females than in sexually mature females, but no significant difference was observed in males (p = 0.09) (Fig. 2, 3). Furthermore, the level of lws mRNA as a proportion of all opsins was higher in sexually mature than in immature fish (for both males and females), whereas proportional rh2 mRNA levels were lower in sexually mature fish (Fig. 2b, 3b). No differences were observed in the proportions of the mRNA levels of other opsin genes (Fig. 2, 3). While reproductive condition (i.e., sexual maturity) significantly affected relative and proportional lws and rh2 mRNA levels (two-way ANOVA, p<0.05 in all comparisons) in stickleback, sex was not observed to have an effect on either relative or proportional expression of rh2 or lws (two-way ANOVA, rh2: p = 0.804 or 0.820; lws: 0.603 or 0.581).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Opsin mRNA levels in sexually mature and immature females.

Experiment 1; (a) Relative opsin mRNA levels and (b) proportions of cone opsin mRNA levels in immature (○) and sexually mature (•) females. Means ± SEM are shown. *p<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Opsin mRNA levels in sexually mature and immature males.

Experiment 1; (a) Relative opsin mRNA levels and (b) proportions of cone opsin mRNA levels in immature (○) and sexually mature (•) males. Means ± SEM are shown. *p<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g003

Through exp. 2, we observed that relative levels of lws mRNA under long day conditions were higher in sham-operated males than in castrated males, while mRNA levels of other opsin genes, including rh2, were unchanged (Fig. 4a). Sham-operated males exhibited a higher proportional level of lws, but a lower proportional level of rh2; mRNA levels of other opsin genes were unaffected (Fig. 4b).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Opsin mRNA levels in castrated and sham-operated males.

Experiment 2; (a) Relative opsin mRNA levels and (b) proportions of cone opsin mRNA levels in castrated (○) and sham-operated (•) males. Means ± SEM are shown. *p<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g004

In exp. 3, sham-operated males kept under long day conditions exhibited higher relative lws mRNA levels (Fig. 5a) and higher proportional lws expression (Fig. 5c) than those kept under short day conditions. Under long day conditions, castrated males with 11 KA implants exhibited higher relative levels of lws, but lower levels of rh2 mRNA, than castrated control males (Fig. 5a, b). However, under short day conditions, significant differences between these groups were only observed for proportional lws and rh2 levels (Fig. 5c, d). 11 KA significantly affected relative and proportional lws mRNA levels (p<0.001) and proportional rh2 mRNA levels (p<0.05) in castrated fish under both photoperids (Two-way ANOVA). Furthermore, photoperiod was found to affect proportional lws mRNA levels (p<0.001), but not relative or proportional rh2 mRNA levels (p = 0.461; p = 0.285). The relative and proportional mRNA levels of the other opsin genes were not affected by castration or 11 KA treatment, under either short or long day photoperiods.

thumbnail

Figure 5. Opsin mRNA levels in castrated males treated with androgen.

Experiment 3; effects of castration and androgen treatment on relative (a) rh2 and (b) lws mRNA levels, and (c) rh2 and (d) lws levels as a proportion of total cone opsin mRNA, under long or short day conditions. Castrated control males (○), castrated males with 11 KA treatment (▵), and sham-operated males (•). Means ± SEM are shown. *p<0.05; **p<0.005.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g005

ERG

Light-adapted sticklebacks exhibited the greatest sensitivity (lowest threshold) to light with a wavelength of 500 nm (21.5±1.56 quantum flux (10−5 µmol/m2/s); means ± SD) (Fig. S2). No significant difference in the threshold at 500 nm was observed between treatments (p>0.05 for each comparison). Figure 5 shows the relative spectral sensitivity curves, which were normalized to the sensitivity at 500 nm for each fish. The relative sensitivities in the green spectrum (500 or 520 nm) were far higher than those for red (600/670 nm) and blue (440 nm) for all treatments. Moreover, male sticklebacks were more sensitive to short wavelength red light (600 nm) than long wavelength red light (670 nm) (Fig. 6).

thumbnail

Figure 6. ERG spectral sensitivities.

Experiment 4; spectral sensitivities of sham-operated males, castrated control males, and castrated males treated with 11-ketoandrostenedione under long day photoperiods, and sham-operated males under a short day photoperiod. Spectral sensitivities were determined through ERG analyses of 5 fish for each group. All data were normalized to the threshold at the most sensitive wavelength (i.e. 500 nm) for each fish. Means ± SEM are shown. *p<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.g006

In exp. 4, sham-operated males maintained under long day photoperiods exhibited greater sensitivity to light with a wavelength of 600 nm than those maintained under short day conditions, whereas no significant difference in sensitivity to 670 nm light was observed (p = 0.073). Under long day conditions, sham-operated males and castrated males treated with 11 KA showed significantly greater relative sensitivity to the red part of the spectrum (600 and 670 nm), as compared to castrated control males (Fig. 5). No significant difference in relative sensitivity was observed at any other wavelength.

Discussion

Breeding colours and high KSIs were observed in males kept under long day, but not under short day conditions, in agreement with the findings of several earlier studies [40][42]. Both traits were suppressed by castration and stimulated by 11 KA, also consistent with previous reports [41], [42]. Levels of lws mRNA were higher in sexually mature than in immature male and female sticklebacks. Moreover, the ERG results revealed that short photoperiod males were less sensitive to red light (at least at 600 nm) than males stimulated to breed by long photoperiod. In addition to the findings of previous optomotor test experiments [4], [14], the molecular and electrophysiological results confirmed that the red light sensitivity of stickleback changes during the breeding period. Furthermore, our current results are consistent with the reported increase in red light sensitivity exhibited by sticklebacks of both sexes in summer [4]. Changes in spectrum sensitivity are often due to changes in the photic environment [43], [44], rather than changes in physiological conditions. However, the effects of castration and androgen-treatments reported here indicate a specific role in reproductive physiology, most likely an enhanced sensitivity to the male signal. The observed correlation between lws mRNA levels and red light sensitivity described here are in general agreement with findings in zebrafish [23], in which circadian rhythms of behavioural red light sensitivity are correlated with lws expression.

Despite reduced levels of rh2 mRNA in sexually mature male sticklebacks and androgen-treated castrated males, ERG (this study) and optomotor tests [14] failed to reveal any changes in green light sensitivity. Since the λmax of the stickleback rod photopigment overlaps with the spectral range of rh2 opsin [18], the ERG signals at wavelengths 500 to 540 nm potentially represent the overlap of rod and rh2 cone signals, even if the fish were adapted to light. Hence, the ERG thresholds at these spectral ranges may not be representative of actual green colour vision.

Our results demonstrate that exposure to long day photoperiods fails to increase lws mRNA levels in castrated males. However, androgen treatment had a distinct stimulatory effect on both lws mRNA level and ERG red light sensitivity in castrated males. Although a connection between androgens and the visual system has not been previously demonstrated, sex steroids are known to enhance pheromone sensitivity in salmon [8]. In juvenile tinfoil barb (Puntius schwanenfeldii), olfactory sensitivity to prostaglandin (a fish sex pheromone) is increased at 9 days after treatment with 17α-methyltestosterone [45]. Moreover, treatment with 17β-oestradiol and testosterone can up-regulate pheromone receptor genes (VR1 and VR4) in the basal zone of the vomeronasal organ in mouse [9].

Several mechanisms may alter visual sensitivity in fishes, including changes in chromophore types [19], changes in the assembly of photoreceptors, and altered opsin levels within a photoperiod class [46][48]. In stickleback, different proportions of double cone types (red/red; green/red) have been detected in fish collected from waters with different levels and compositions of ambient light [18]. However, the overall single and double cone mosaics are largely consistent between fish. In sticklebacks transferred from red light-shifted lakes to clear water, the proportion of green/red double cones increased, while the proportion of red/red double cones decreased slightly; on the other hand, double cone density remained constant [18]. In the current study, we detected changes in lws/rh2 expression, but no significant changes in relative or proportional sws1/sws2 mRNA levels, suggesting that breeding-induced shifts in spectral sensitivity may arise from double cones, but not from single cone assembly. Such changes in lws/rh2 proportion may be a result of green/red double cone apoptosis and their replacement by newly differentiated red/red double cones [18], or simply by changes in opsin content in an existing cone.

Effects of hormones or neurotransmitters on opsin gene expression have been shown previously in some fishes, although these have not been found to be closely related to reproductive physiology. In coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), spectral sensitivity changes during smoltification when fish are preparing to migrate from fresh water to the sea [49]. Administration of L-thyroxine (T4), which increases naturally during smoltification [50], results in up-regulation of the rh2a opsin gene, and may thus induce this visual sensitivity shift before migration [49]. In zebrafish, dopamine (DA) treatment increases levels of lws opsin mRNA, which possibly results in higher red light sensitivity during the daytime [23]. Furthermore, orally-administered gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) can up-regulate rh2b and down-regulate rh2a mRNA levels in the retinae of zebra cichlids (Metriaclima zebra) [22]. The best-known role of GnRH is that it stimulates reproduction via gonadotropin release, but it also has many other roles [51]. GnRH-immunoreactive fibres innervate the retinae of several fishes, including the stickleback [52].

In addition to altering opsin expression, hormones can also change A1/A2 chromophore types. Injection of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and salmon pituitary extract can shift the peak sensitivity wavelength of retinal rod cells [21]. Treatment of juvenile rainbow trout with T4 induced not only an opsin expression switch, but also a chromophore shift from vitamin A1 to vitamin A2 [53]. Although the effects vary among species and physiological conditions, T4 and 3, 5, 3′-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3) may interact with the reproductive endocrine system [54], [55]. The results of these earlier studies suggest that switching between the A1 and A2 chromophores may be another mechanism of fine-tuning spectrum sensitivity.

Both sexes display a similar increase in red light sensitivity [4] and lws opsin mRNA levels in the breeding state. The present study indicates that androgens, which control reproductive behaviour and secondary sexual characteristics in stickleback [42], [56], [57], also control red light sensitivity in the male. In the male stickleback, 11 KT is the most abundant and effective androgen, and its levels peak in the breeding period [28]. Although 11 KT levels in female sticklebacks are much lower than in males, T levels are higher, and also peak in the breeding period [28]. Red light sensitivity in the female may, therefore, also be controlled by androgens (or other gonadal hormones), although it was not possible to test this adequately as females cannot be gonadectomised. Though it is clear that androgens control red light sensitivity in male sticklebacks, the exact mechanism requires further elucidation. Androgen may have direct effects in the retinae [26], or its effect may be exerted via other neuronal or hormonal systems.

The ability of female sticklebacks to detect the red breeding colour of males is not trivial. In eutrophic environments with turbid water, spectral signalling becomes less effective. Females are more likely to choose males in clear water (which are more visible) than males in turbid water, even if the former are less red [58]. A female with a reduced capability to detect red would be less able to observe males. This is particularly significant, as it is not just a question of a female stickleback choosing the best possible mate, but also of getting a mate at all, as it is common for female sticklebacks to court the male, especially at the end of the breeding season [59]. A male with a high sensitivity to red light during the breeding period would have a selective advantage in knowing the whereabouts of his rivals, to defend his territory and prevent sneaking [6], [7], which in the stickleback is largely a behaviour exhibited by other territorial, also red, males.

In conclusion, the relative and proportional levels of lws mRNA increase in both sexes during sexual maturation, which is consistent with the higher red light sensitivity in the breeding state. In male sticklebacks, the changes in lws mRNA and red spectral sensitivity are dependent on androgen, indicating that the changes in the retina are specifically related to reproductive physiology.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Photon fluxes at different wavelengths. A series of neutral density (ND) filters were used to reduce the light intensity in 0.3 log unit steps from −0.3 to −4.8 log units (15 steps). Narrow bandpass filters provided light in the wavelength range 400–670 nm.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

ERG spectral threshold. Spectral threshold of sham-operated males, castrated control males, and castrated males treated with 11-ketoandrostenedione under long day photoperiod, and sham-operated males under a short day photoperiod. Spectral thresholds were determined through ERG analyses of 5 fish for each group. A logarithmic scale is used for the y axis. Means ± SEM are shown.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100330.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The article was improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers. We thank Dr. Duncan Wright for English editing.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YTS HYY KA BB. Performed the experiments: YTS FYW WCF BB. Analyzed the data: YTS WCF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HYY KA ISC BB. Wrote the paper: YTS HYY BB.

References

  1. 1. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1–12. doi: 10.2307/2407961
  2. 2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. USA: Princeton University Press. 624 p.
  3. 3. Fisher RA (1915) The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Rev 7: 184–192.
  4. 4. Boulcott P, Braithwaite V (2007) Colour perception in three-spined sticklebacks: sexes are not so different after all. Evol Ecol 21: 601–611. doi: 10.1007/s10682-006-9138-4
  5. 5. Rowland WJ (1994) Proximate determinants of stickleback behaviour: an evolutionary perspective. In: Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. The evolutionary ecology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press 297–344.
  6. 6. van den Assem J (1967) Territory in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L.: An experimental study in intra-specific competition. Behaviour supplement III: 1–164. doi: 10.1002/iroh.19710560230
  7. 7. Largiader CR, Fries V, Bakker TC (2001) Genetic analysis of sneaking and egg-thievery in a natural population of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Heredity (Edinb) 86: 459–468. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00850.x
  8. 8. Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340: 215–225. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0060
  9. 9. Alekseyenko OV, Baum MJ, Cherry JA (2006) Sex and gonadal steroid modulation of pheromone receptor gene expression in the mouse vomeronasal organ. Neuroscience 140: 1349–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.001
  10. 10. Moore A, Scott AP (1991) Testosterone is a potent odorant in precocious male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 332: 241–244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0052
  11. 11. Clark L, Smeraski CA (1990) Seasonal shifts in odor acuity by starlings. J Exp Zool 255: 22–29. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402550105
  12. 12. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 387–388.
  13. 13. Künzler R, Bakker TCM (2001) Female preferences for single and combined traits in computer animated stickleback males. Behav Ecol 12: 681–685. doi: 10.1093/beheco/12.6.681
  14. 14. Cronly-Dillon J, Sharma SC (1968) Effect of season and sex on the photopic spectral sensitivity of the three-spined stickleback. J Exp Biol 49: 679–687.
  15. 15. Williams DD, Delbeek JC (1989) Biology of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, and the blackspotted stickleback, G. wheatlandi, during their marine pelagic phase in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Env Biol Fish 24: 33–41. doi: 10.1007/bf00001608
  16. 16. Yokoyama S, Yang H, Starmer WT (2008) Molecular basis of spectral tuning in the red- and green-sensitive (M/LWS) pigments in vertebrates. Genetics 179, 2037–2043.
  17. 17. Hofmann CM, O'Quin KE, Smith AR, Carleton KL (2010) Plasticity of opsin gene expression in cichlids from Lake Malawi. Mol Ecol 19: 2064–2074. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04621.x
  18. 18. Novales Flamarique I, Cheng CL, Bergstrom C, Reimchen TE (2013) Pronounced heritable variation and limited phenotypic plasticity in visual pigments and opsin expression of threespine stickleback photoreceptors. J Exp Biol 216: 656–667. doi: 10.1242/jeb.078840
  19. 19. Temple SE, Plate EM, Ramsden S, Haimberger TJ, Roth WM, et al. (2006) Seasonal cycle in vitamin A1/A2-based visual pigment composition during the life history of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192: 301–313. doi: 10.1007/s00359-005-0068-3
  20. 20. Novales Flamarique I (2005) Temporal shifts in visual pigment absorbance in the retina of Pacific salmon. J Comp Physiol A 191: 37–49. doi: 10.1007/s00359-004-0573-9
  21. 21. Wood P, Partridge JC (1993) Opsin substitution induced in retinal rods of the eel (Anguilla anguilla (L.)): a model for G-protein-linked receptors. Proc R Soc Lond B 254: 227–232. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0150
  22. 22. Dedden I (2011) The effect of gonadotropin releasing hormone on opsin gene expression and spectral sensitivity in zebra cichlid fish (Metriaclima zebra). Master thesis Canada: Queen’s University.
  23. 23. Li P, Temple S, Gao Y, Haimberger TJ, Hawryshyn CW, et al. (2005) Circadian rhythms of behavioral cone sensitivity and long wavelength opsin mRNA expression: a correlation study in zebrafish. J Exp Biol 208: 497–504. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01424
  24. 24. Harbott LK, Burmeister SS, White RB, Vagell M, Fernald RD (2007) Androgen receptors in a cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni: structure, localization, and expression levels. J Comp Neurol 504: 57–73. doi: 10.1002/cne.21435
  25. 25. Tchoudakova A, Pathak S, Callard GV (1999) Molecular cloning of an estrogen receptor beta subtype from the goldfish, Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 113: 388–400. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1998.7217
  26. 26. Hoffmann E, Walstad A, Karlsson J, Olsson PE, Borg B (2012) Androgen receptor-beta mRNA levels in different tissues in breeding and post-breeding male and female sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10: 23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-23
  27. 27. Borg B (1994) Androgens in teleost fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 109: 219–245.
  28. 28. Hellqvist A, Schmitz M, Mayer I, Borg B (2006) Seasonal changes in expression of LH-β and FSH-β in male and female three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 145: 263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.09.012
  29. 29. Rowland WJ, Bolyard KJ, Jenkins JJ, Fowler J (1995) Video playback experiments on stickleback mate choice: female motivation and attentiveness to male colour cues. Anim Behav 49: 1559–1567. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)90077-2
  30. 30. Shao YT, Rüdiger WS, Borg B (2012) Homeostasis of circulating androgen levels in the breeding male three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Zool Stud 51: 1282–1289.
  31. 31. Cheng CL, Gan KJ, Novales Flamarique I (2009) Thyroid hormone induces a time-dependent opsin switch in the retina of salmonid fishes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50: 3024–3032. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2713
  32. 32. Wu DM, Schneiderman T, Burgett J, Gokhale P, Barthel L, et al. (2001) Cones regenerate from retinal stem cells sequestered in the inner nuclear layer of adult goldfish retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 2115–2124.
  33. 33. Morita Y, Meyer-Rochow VB, Uchida K (1997) Absolute and spectral sensitivities in dark- and light-adapted Pagothenia borchgrevinki, an Antarctic nototheniid fish. Physiol Behav 61: 159–163. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00354-x
  34. 34. Seeliger MW, Rilk A, Neuhauss SC (2002) Ganzfeld ERG in zebrafish larvae. Doc Ophthalmol 104: 57–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1014454927931
  35. 35. Lisney TJ, Studd E, Hawryshyn CW (2010) Electrophysiological assessment of spectral sensitivity in adult Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus: evidence for violet sensitivity. J Exp Biol 213: 1453–1463. doi: 10.1242/jeb.036897
  36. 36. Jakobsson S, Borg B, Haux C, Hyllner SJ (1999) An 11-ketotestosterone induced kidney-secreted protein: the nest building glue from male three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Fish Physiol Biochem 20: 79–85.
  37. 37. Carleton KL, Kocher TD (2001) Cone opsin genes of African cichlid fishes: tuning spectral sensitivity by differential gene expression. Mol Biol Evol 18: 1540–1550. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003940
  38. 38. Fuller RC, Carleton KL, Fadool JM, Spady TC, Travis J (2004) Population variation in opsin expression in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei: a real-time PCR study. J Com Physiol A 190: 147–154. doi: 10.1007/s00359-003-0478-z
  39. 39. Spady TC, Parry JW, Robinson PR, Hunt DM, Bowmaker JK, et al. (2006) Evolution of the cichlid visual palette through ontogenetic subfunctionalization of the opsin gene arrays. Mol Biol Evo 23: 1538–1547. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl014
  40. 40. Borg B (2010) Photoperiodism in fishes. In: Nelson RJ, Denlinger DL, Somers DE, editors. Photoperiodism: The Biological Calendar. Oxford: University Press. 371–398.
  41. 41. Shao YT, Arvidsson M, Trombley S, Schulz RW, Schmitz M, et al. (2013) Androgen feedback effects on LH and FSH, and photoperiodic control of reproduction in male three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 182: 16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.10.017
  42. 42. Borg B, Antonopoulou E, Andersson E, Carlberg T, Mayer I (1993) Effectiveness of several androgens in stimulating kidney hypertrophy, a secondary sexual character, in castrated male three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Can J Zool 7: 2327–2329. doi: 10.1139/z93-326
  43. 43. Shand J, Davies WL, Thomas N, Balmer L, Cowing JA, et al. (2008) The influence of ontogeny and light environment on the expression of visual pigment opsins in the retina of the black bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri.. J Exp Biol 211: 1495–1503. doi: 10.1242/jeb.012047
  44. 44. Maximov VV (2000) Environmental factors which may have led to the appearance of colour vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355: 1239–1242. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0675
  45. 45. Cardwell JR, Stacey NE, Lang SLC, Tan ESP, McAdam DSO (1995) Androgen increases olfactory receptor response to a vertebrate sex pheromone. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 176: 55–61. doi: 10.1007/bf00197752
  46. 46. Shand J, Archer MA, Collin SP (1999) Ontogenetic changes in the retinal photoreceptor mosaic in a fish, the black bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri. J Comp Neurol 412: 203–217. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<203::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-3
  47. 47. Allison WT, Dann SG, Helvik JV, Bradley C, Moyer HD, et al. (2003) Ontogeny of ultraviolet-sensitive cones in the retina of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Comp Neurol 461: 294–306. doi: 10.1002/cne.10682
  48. 48. Bowmaker JK, Loew ER (2008) Vision in Fish. In: Bushnell MC, Smith DV, Beauchamp GK, Firestein SJ, Dallos P, Oertel D, Masland RH, Albright TD, Kaas JH, Gardner EP, Basbaum AI, editors. The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York: Academic Press. 53–76.
  49. 49. Temple SE, Veldhoen KM, Phelan JT, Veldhoen NJ, Hawryshyn CW (2008) Ontogenetic changes in photoreceptor opsin gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch, Walbaum). J Exp Biol 211: 3879–3888. doi: 10.1242/jeb.020289
  50. 50. Young G, Björnsson BT, Prunet P, Lin RJ, Bern HA (1989) Smoltification and seawater adaptation in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): plasma prolactin, growth hormone, thyroid hormones, and cortisol. Gen Comp Endocrinol 74: 335–345. doi: 10.1016/s0016-6480(89)80029-2
  51. 51. Amano M, Urano A, Aida K (1997) Distribution and function of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the teleost brain. Zoolog Sci 14: 1–11. doi: 10.2108/zsj.14.1
  52. 52. Andersson E (1992) Neuroendocrine control of reproduction in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Doctoral thesis Stockholm: Stockholm University.
  53. 53. Suliman T, Novales Flamarique I (2014) Visual pigments and opsin expression in the juveniles of three species of fish (rainbow trout, zebrafish, and killifish) following prolonged exposure to thyroid hormone or retinoic acid. J Comp Neuro 522: 98–117. doi: 10.1002/cne.23391
  54. 54. Cyr DG, Eales JG (1996) Interrelationships between thyroidal and reproductive endocrine systems in fish. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 6: 165–200. doi: 10.1007/bf00182342
  55. 55. Habibi HR, Nelson ER, Allan ERO (2012) New insights into thyroid hormone function and modulation of reproduction in goldfish. Gen Com Endocrinol 175: 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.11.003
  56. 56. Borg B, Mayer I (1995) Androgens and behaviour in the three-spined stickleback. Behaviour 132: 1025–1035. doi: 10.1163/156853995x00432
  57. 57. Wai EH, Hoar WS (1963) The secondary sex characters and reproductive behavior of gonadectomized sticklebacks treated with methyl testosterone. Can J Zool 41: 611–628. doi: 10.1139/z63-034
  58. 58. Engström-Öst J, Candolin U (2007) Human-induced water turbidity alters selection on sexual displays in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol 18: 393–398. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arl097
  59. 59. Borg B (1985) Field studies on three-spined sticklebacks in the baltic. Behaviour 93: 153–157. doi: 10.1163/156853986x00810