Advertisement
Research Article

Identification of Novel Genetic Alterations in Samples of Malignant Glioma Patients

  • Vedrana Milinkovic,

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Department of Neurobiology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Jasna Bankovic,

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Department of Neurobiology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Miodrag Rakic,

    Affiliation: Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Tijana Stankovic,

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Department of Neurobiology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Milica Skender-Gazibara,

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, School of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Sabera Ruzdijic,

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Department of Neurobiology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Nikola Tanic mail

    nikolata@ibiss.bg.ac.rs

    Affiliation: University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, Department of Neurobiology, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

    X
  • Published: December 16, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082108

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant human brain tumor. High level of genomic instability detected in glioma cells implies that numerous genetic alterations accumulate during glioma pathogenesis. We investigated alterations in AP-PCR DNA profiles of 30 glioma patients, and detected specific changes in 11 genes not previously associated with this disease: LHFPL3, SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1, PROS1, GP2, KCNG2, PDE4D, KIR3DL3, and INPP5A. Further correlations revealed that 8 genes might play important role in pathogenesis of glial tumors, while changes in GP2, KCNG2 and KIR3DL3 should be considered as passenger mutations, consequence of high level of genomic instability. Identified genes have a significant role in signal transduction or cell adhesion, which are important processes for cancer development and progression. According to our results, LHFPL3 might be characteristic of primary glioblastoma, SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1, PROS1 and INPP5A were detected predominantly in anaplastic astrocytoma, suggesting their role in progression of secondary glioblastoma, while alterations of PDE4D seem to have important role in development of both glioblastoma subtypes. Some of the identified genes showed significant association with p53, p16, and EGFR, but there was no significant correlation between loss of PTEN and any of identified genes. In conclusion our study revealed genetic alterations that were not previously associated with glioma pathogenesis and could be potentially used as molecular markers of different glioblastoma subtypes.

Introduction

Cancer is a genetic disease characterized by DNA sequence changes, copy number aberrations, chromosomal rearrangements and modification in DNA methylation leading to compromised regulatory mechanisms governing cell proliferation and homeostasis. Studies carried out over the past three decades suggest that malignant gliomas, like other cancers, represent a consequence of the accumulation of genetic alterations, although their nature and exact number required for tumorigenesis remain unclear.

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive brain tumor. Majority of glioblastomas (GBM, WHO grade IV) develop de novo (primary glioblastomas) without clinical or histological evidence of a less malignant precursor lesion, while others, progressing from low-grade diffuse astrocytoma or anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), represent rare secondary glioblastomas. Despite a similar histological appearance, primary and secondary glioblastomas are distinct tumor entities that originate from different precursor cells containing different genetic alterations [1]. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification and PTEN mutations are genetic alterations typical of primary glioblastomas, whereas p53 mutations are early and frequent genetic alterations in the pathway leading to secondary glioblastomas. Furthermore, mutations in the active site of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) were associated with secondary GBMs [2]. On the other hand, LOH 10q and alterations of p16INK4a/RB1 pathway seem to be important in the development of both primary and secondary glioblastomas [3]. Besides these frequently altered pathways, there is evidence of large number of genetic alterations in glioblastoma samples, reported in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. TCGA project enabled the integrated analyses of multi-dimensional genomic data collected from different platforms with the aim to better characterize and understand tumor origin, behavior and treatment [4].

However, further analyses are needed to identify additional potentially useful genetic alterations for the classification and targeted therapy of GBMs. Besides, significant level of genomic instability and heterogeneity detected in glial tumors confirm that they evolve along a multitude of pathways rather than along a single defined pathway [5], [6], [7]. Even though only a few specific genetic pathways are consistently highlighted, there are undoubtedly complex interactions among them as well as with additional yet unknown factors. Reliable molecular markers are needed to enable the identification of patients at risk for developing GBM, improve the early detection and appropriate diagnosis, as well as to provide molecular profile for better prediction of patient outcome and response to therapy.

A number of techniques based on PCR, hybridization, and conformation changes, as well as modern high-throughput genome wide techniques can be employed for the detection of specific mutations in cancer cells. AP-PCR DNA fingerprinting method has numerous advantages over conventional methods, mainly because no prior knowledge of the genome under investigation is required and because it allows the screening of the whole genome including non coding DNA regions. Furthermore, AP-PCR is a reliable, inexpensive method that does not require complex equipment, does providing highly reproducible patterns of amplified fragments which faithfully reflect differences in DNA sequences and/or relative abundance of the templates and enable detection of genetic alterations in tumor tissue [8]. Finally, the possibility of further analysis of variant bands by reamplification, cloning, and sequencing enables rapid identification of genes probably linked to the development and progression of malignant tumor [9]. AP-PCR has already proven to be highly informative for analysis of cancer associated somatic mutations since it has been implemented in the analyzes of various cancers, including pancreatic and colorectal carcinomas [10], [11], as well as lung [12], [13], and breast cancers [14].

We applied AP-PCR for the detection of anonymous multiple genetic alterations in 30 patients with AA and GBM. Following our previous study of genomic instability in glioma patients [15] we analyzed altered sequences in tumor DNA profiles with the aim to identify genes specific for glioma pathogenesis. Furthermore, we examined identified genes in relation to genomic instability, clinicopathological parameters, and patients' survival. Also, we tested the association of the most frequently present genetic alterations in primary and secondary glioblastomas with newly identified genes with the aim to recognize potential molecular markers of different glioblastoma subtypes.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The samples were collected and used after obtaining informed consents and approval from the Ethical Committee of Clinical Center of Serbia (approval number 3672/1), in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, Laws of Republic of Serbia, as well as GCP guidelines. All participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The form of informed consent was approved by the Ethical Committee of Clinical Center of Serbia.

Tissue samples

Paired cancer tissue and blood samples were collected from 30 patients who underwent surgery at Neurosurgery Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia. The specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen, where they were kept until DNA extraction. All patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III; n = 8) or glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV; n = 22) according to the 2007 WHO classification [16]. All grade IV tumors were considered primary (de novo) because the glioblastoma diagnosis was made at the first biopsy, without clinical or histopathological evidence of a less malignant precursor lesion. The 30 patients included 19 men and 11 women, with a median age of 56.9 years (within the range of 20 to 84 years). The median overall survival was 11 months. Patients received neither radio- nor chemotherapy before surgery.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Following routine hematoxylin-eosin method for staining of paraffin tissue sections [15], we performed immunohistochemical staining for p53 to further characterize our samples. Sections of tissue were subsequently heated in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and stained with the streptavidin-biotin technique using antibody against p53 protein (Dako, Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-Human Antibody, dilution 1:50), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted using the phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol method [17]. The quality of the DNA was verified by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gel. The DNA concentration was assessed spectrophotometrically.

AP-PCR DNA fingerprinting

AP-PCR DNA fingerprinting, was used to compare DNA profiles of paired tumor and blood samples of the same patient [15]. In short, seven primers were tested for the ability to generate informative fingerprints that distinguish tumor from normal tissue. Optimization of AP-PCR reactions was done for each primer according to Cobb [18] and included the search for conditions that would yield profiles of moderate complexity in order to simplify the analysis [19]. Primer sequences, reaction conditions, and amplification profiles were described previously [15].

AP-PCR products were separated on 6–8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide (PAA) gels and visualized by silver staining. Gel images were acquired with the Multi-Analyst/PC Software Image Analysis System (Bio Rad Gel Doc 1000). Digitized images were loaded into the specialized public software Image J (National Institute of Health, USA, www.rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) and analyzed by the image enhancement function ‘adapthisteq’ as previously described [15].

Isolation, cloning and sequencing of variant electrophoretic bands

Twenty selected DNA bands with altered mobility were further characterized. The PCR amplicons resolved on the silver stained PAA gels were gently removed with a hypodermic 22-gauge needle pre-wetted with the PCR master mix solution. The needle was dipped in the PCR master mix for 2 min and then discarded. The PCR products were reamplified with the same primers used for AP-PCR reactions at high-stringency conditions specific for each particular primer [20]. The reamplified material was administrated on 1.5% agarose gels, purified using DNA Extraction Kit (Fermentas Life Sciences, Lithuania) and cloned with GeneJet™ PCR Cloning Kit (Fermentas Life Sciences, Lithuania) according to manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids were purified using GeneJet™ Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Fermentas Life Sciences, Lithuania). Sequences were determined on ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed in both directions on several clones for each selected DNA band. The obtained sequences were analyzed and identified using BLAST software in the NCBI GenBank and EBI (Sanger Institute) database.

Analysis of alterations in p53, PTEN, and p16 tumor suppressor genes

Alterations of p53 tumor suppressor gene were analyzed in our previous study [15]. Frequently mutated exons of p53 gene (5–9) were amplified and screened for mutations by PCR-SSCP (Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism) analysis according to Orita et al. [21]. Detected mutations were confirmed by sequencing with Applied Biosystems Incorporated dye terminator sequencing kit according to the manufacturer's specifications on an ABI Prism 3130 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA).

Tumor and blood DNA obtained from all 30 patients was used to study the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of p53, PTEN and p16 tumor suppressors. As described previously, LOH analysis of p53 was performed by fragment analysis with highly polymorphic microsatellite markers (TP53pentanucleotide, TP53dinucleotide, D17S1537 and D17S786) specific for chromosomal region spanning p53 gene locus [15]. Five polymorphic microsatellite markers lying within or flanking PTEN gene (D10S579, D10S1765, D10S215, AFM086wg9, and D10S541) were selected to cover deletions at the whole PTEN locus on chromosome 10q23. All forward primers were 5′-labeled with Fam, Vic, Ned, Pet, and Fam fluorescent dyes, respectively. The choice of the microsatellite markers and locus-specific PCR conditions was determined from published sources [22], [23].

Another set of 3 polymorphic microsatellite markers spanning the INK4a/ARF locus (D9S171, D9S1748 and D9S162) were selected to cover deletions on chromosome 9p21–23 [24]. All forward primers were 5′-labeled with Ned, Pet and Vic fluorescent dyes, respectively. PCR products for all LOH analyses were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI Prism 3130 automated sequencer and sized using GeneScan −500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). The obtained data were analyzed with the GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). DNA extracted from peripheral blood of each patient was used as a reference. A marker was defined as noninformative (homozygote) when only 1 allelic peak was detected in the reference sample. Contrary to this, a marker was considered informative (heterozygote) when two major allelic peaks occurred in a blood specimen. The LOH score was calculated automatically by GeneMapper software according to the following equation: (peak height of normal allele 2)/(peak height of normal allele 1) divided by (peak height of tumor allele 2)/(peak height of tumor allele 1). A sample was considered to be a LOH candidate for particular locus if the ratio values were less than 0.67 and higher than 1.35. p16 was also tested for the presence of homozygous deletions by a differential PCR method, according to conditions determined from published sources [12]. Briefly, a 199-bp fragment of INK4a/ARF locus from exon 2 was co-amplified with a 131-bp fragment of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) gene, which was used as internal control. Primer sequences were previously described by Hayashi et al. [25]. Forward primers were 5′-labeled with Fam fluorescent dye. Fluorescent PCR products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI Prism 3130 automated sequencer and sized using GeneScan −500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Obtained data were analyzed by fragment analysis with the GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The presence of homozygous deletions was determined according to ratio of peak intensities of INK4a/ARF and APRT in tumor samples relative to the same ratio in normal samples. A sample had homozygous deletion of INK4a/ARF locus and consequently p16 tumor suppressor gene if the value of this proportion was higher than 2.

Amplification status of EGFR gene

For differential PCR analysis, a 110-bp fragment of the EGFR gene on chromosome 7 was co-amplified with a 168-bp fragment of β-actin (ACTB) gene on the same chromosome. The primer sequences were as follows: 5′-AGC CAT GCC CGC ATT AGC TC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AAA GGA ATG CAA CTT CCC AA-3′ (antisense) for EGFR, and 5′-CTC TTT TCT TTC CCG ATA GGT-3′ (sense) and 5′-CTG GGA TGC TCT TCG ACC TC-3′ (antisense) for the ACTB. Genomic DNA (100 ng) was amplified with 0.8 µM of each primer, 1× KCl Buffer, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.25 mM of dNTPs, and 1 U Taq polymerase (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific) in reaction volume of 25 µl. The PCR reaction was performed on the GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Bioscience) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes was followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 minute, at 58°C for 1 minute and at 72°C for 1 minute, with final elongation at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR products were loaded on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. Multi-Analyst/PC Software Image Analysis System (Bio-Rad GelDoc 1000) was employed for densitometric analysis.

Ratio of the EGFR/ACTB score from tumor and blood tissue of each patient was calculated and values higher than 2 indicated presence of EGFR gene amplification.

Statistical analysis

Significant differences between the data sets were determined by STATISTICA 6.0 software (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA). The correlations between identified genes and genomic instability, clinicopathological parameters and alterations of p53, PTEN, p16, and EGFR were evaluated using Fisher exact test. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan and Meier product-limit method. The log rank test was used to assess the significance of the difference between pairs of survival probabilities. Overall survival was calculated from the day after surgery to the last follow-up examination or death of the patient. Statistical differences were considered significant when p was ≤0.05 (*), p≤0.01 (**) and p≤0.005 (***).

Results

Histopathological classification of tumor samples

After staining of surgically removed tissues by routine hematoxylin-eosin method and immunohistochemical testing for p53 positivity (Fig. 1) we confirmed diagnosis of 8 anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III) and 22 glioblastoma multiforme samples (WHO grade IV) according to WHO criteria (2007).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Immunohistochemical characterization of samples.

Example of anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). (A) Cellular tumor with increased mitotic activity (HE ×200) (B) Diffuse nuclear p53 positivity of tumor cells (immunostaining ×250).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.g001

Analysis of variant DNA fragments

Seven AP-PCR primers were used to discriminate normal from tumor tissue. Four of them produced informative AP-PCR DNA profiles containing explicit and countable differences between tumor and blood in all 30 patients that were analyzed. Observed differences were further classified as qualitative (mobility shifts in the banding pattern due to mutations at the primer-template interaction sites) and quantitative (altered band intensities representing amplifications or deletions of existing chromosomal material) and were used as a measurement of the level of total, microsatellite and chromosomal instability, as described in our previous paper [15]. Significant level of genomic instability was present in all samples, and based on the distribution of the frequency of DNA alterations, patients were assorted into two groups, with low or high level of genomic instability (Table 1).

thumbnail

Table 1. Distribution of samples according to the level of genomic instability.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.t001

The next step in our work was to identify some of the aberrant bands in DNA AP-PCR profiles common to more than 5 patients. Hence, twenty aberrant bands were retrieved from the PAA gels and cloned (Fig. 2A). Bands (amplicons) with the same electrophoretic mobility were isolated and characterized from at least two patients in order to confirm that they represent the same DNA sequence (Fig. 2B). Two clones of each band were sequenced. Obtained sequences were submitted for homology or identity search in NCBI GenBank and EBI (Sanger Institute) databases. Some of the sequences matched known genes and were easily identified, while others represented parts of certain contigs mapped on chromosomes 1, 2, 8q21–q23, 9, and 12, and their identification is yet to be determined (Fig. 2C).

thumbnail

Figure 2. AP-PCR fingerprinting analysis of genomic instability in glioma samples.

(A) AP-PCR profiles of tumor (T) and normal blood (N) tissues from glioma patients obtained using MDR antisense primer, separated on 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide (PAA) gel; 18–20 represent patients; M –DNA ladder; arrows indicate altered electrophoretic bands in tumor DNA profiles that were excised, cloned, sequenced and identified as PDE4D. (B) contrast-limited adaptive histograms obtained using image enhancement function ‘adapthisteq’ of the specialized public software Image J, arrows indicate alterations; (C) the identity of the altered AP-PCR bands determined by BLAST homology search in the NCBI genBank and EBI Sanger databases.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.g002

The following 11 genes were identified: lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 3 (LHFPL3); sarcoglycan, gamma (SGCG); 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 4 (HTR4); integrin beta 1 (ITGB1); mitochondrial carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1); protein S (alpha) (PROS1); glycoprotein 2 (zymogen granule membrane) (GP2, ZAP75); potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily G, member 2 (KCNG2); cAMP-specific 3′,5′-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D); killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor, three domains, long cytoplasmic tail, 3 (KIR3DL3); inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase (INPP5A). We were also able to identify types of mutations in these genes. Namely, we identified nucleotide substitutions in KIR3DL3, INPP5A and KCNG2, multiple nucleotide substitutions in SGCG, PDE4D and LHFPL3, while HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1, PROS1 and GP2 were carrying both multiple substitutions and 2 nucleotide deletions (Fig. 3). We then analyzed eight out of 11 identified genes regarding the expression profile of these genes in glial cells as a basic criterion.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Identification of genetic alterations in tumor DNA fingerprints.

The identity of the AP-PCR bands was determined by BLAST homology search in the NCBI GenBank and EBI Sanger databases. For each gene identified, numbers indicating beginning and the end of the region of homology in the GenBank sequence, overall sequence identity of the clone (%) and number of gaps are represented.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.g003

Association of identified DNA alterations with genomic instability and clinicopathological parameters

Alterations of eight out of eleven identified genes were further examined in relation to the level of total, microsatellite and chromosomal genomic instability, tumor grade (grade III AA or grade IV GBM), age and sex (Tables 2 and 3). There was no statistical significance in correlation of identified DNA alterations with age and sex of the patients.

thumbnail

Table 2. Association between the frequency of altered genes, clinicopathological parameters and genomic instability.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.t002
thumbnail

Table 3. Association between the frequency of altered genes, clinicopathological parameters and genomic instability.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.t003

LHFPL3 was altered in 10 out of 30 patients (33.3%), predominantly in grade IV glioblastoma samples (36.4% vs. 25% in grade III anaplastic astrocytoma). It was detected in significantly higher percentage in samples with high level of total genomic instability (52.9% vs. 7.7% of samples with low level of total instability, p = 0.005). The same trend was observed for microsatellite (37.5% of samples with high vs. 28.6% of samples with low level) and chromosomal instability (47.1% of samples with high vs. 15.4% of samples with low level), but without statistical significance.

Alterations of SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1 and PROS1 were detected in 26.6% of samples (8 out of 30 patients) and were slightly increased in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (37.5%) compared to GBM (22.7%), as well as in the samples with low level of total genomic instability (38.5% vs. 17.64% with high instability). Statistical significance was observed in case of chromosomal instability, were 53.8% of patients with low level of CIN had alterations in these genes compared to only 5.9% of patients with high level of CIN (p = 0.005).

PDE4D was changed in 9 out of 30 patients (30%) and distributed almost equally in grade III and grade IV glioma (25% vs. 31.8% respectively). Altered PDE4D is associated with high level of chromosomal instability (p = 0.02) because it was detected in 47% of patients with high level of CIN, compared to 7.7% of patients with low level of this type of instability (Table 2).

The most frequently present alteration was in INPP5A gene, detected in 43.3% of patients, predominantly in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (62.5% vs. 36.4% of GBM patients), and patients with high level of genomic instability (Table 3).

Correlation analysis of identified DNA alterations and p53, PTEN, p16 and EGFR alterations

We focused on four most frequently altered genes (p53, PTEN, p16 and EGFR) in the genetic pathways of primary and secondary glioma [3] and analyzed their alterations in our set of samples. Alterations of p53 were detected in 12 samples (40%), preferentially anaplastic astocytoma (p = 0.03), as reported in our previous paper [15]. LOH analyses of PTEN revealed that all 30 examined tumor specimens were heterozygous for at least one of the examined loci and 66.7% (20/30) of them demonstrated LOH. p16 was analyzed for the loss of heterozygosity and homozygous deletions, two most common mechanisms for the inactivation of this tumor suppressor. LOH was detected in 14 out of 30 patients (46.7%). Homozygous deletions were studied by combination of differential PCR and fragment analysis and were detected in 11 out of 30 patients (36.7%). Overall, alterations of p16 were present in 18 samples (60%).

Amplification of EGFR gene, assessed by differential PCR, was detected in 13 samples (43.3%). The Fisher exact test revealed that the frequency of PTEN and EGFR alterations was significantly higher in higher grade tumors (GBM) in comparison to anaplastic astrocytoma (82% vs 25%, p = 0.007 for PTEN and 54.5% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.047 for EGFR). Alterations of p16 were almost equally present in both histological subtypes (data not shown).

Next, we correlated obtained results with the presence of newly identified DNA alterations from AP-PCR DNA profiles of all patients (Tables 4 and 5). Remarkably, alterations of PDE4D were more frequently present in patients with wild-type p53 and p16 (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). On the other hand, altered INPP5A was significantly associated with wild-type EGFR (p = 0.05). Interestingly, there was no significant correlation between loss of PTEN and any of the identified genes.

thumbnail

Table 4. Association of the frequency of identified genes with p53, PTEN, p16 and EGFR alterations.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.t004
thumbnail

Table 5. Association of the frequency of identified genes with p53, PTEN, p16 and EGFR alterations.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.t005

Identified DNA alterations in relation to follow-up

The overall survival of 30 patients was evaluated in relation to presence or absence of alterations of newly detected genes. In all cases patients were divided into two groups, those with and those without altered gene. Although there was no statistically significant difference among patients' survival rate, it was noticed that patients with alterations of SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1 and PROS1 had shorter survival rate (Fig. 4A). The survival of patients with alterations of LHFPL3 was significantly shorter than the survival of patients without these alterations (p = 0.04, Fig. 4B), while alterations of PDE4D and INPP5A seem to have no impact on patients' survival (Fig. 4C,D).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

(A) Patients without alterations in SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1 and PROS1 had tendency for better survival; (B) patients with alterations in LHFPL3 lived significantly shorter (p = 0.04); (C) alterations of PDE4D had no impact on patients' survival (D) alterations of INPP5A had no impact on patients' survival.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082108.g004

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to identify altered genes in 30 human glioma samples specifically associated with progression and outcome of this type of tumor. Our study revealed that AP-PCR fingerprinting is very useful in the identification and characterization of the regions of the genome of human glial tumors that have undergone alterations. The high level of genomic instability (median 34%) observed in all grade III and grade IV tumor samples analyzed in this study indicates the possibility of involvement of many more genes than those currently known to be of importance for development of these tumors. Our results indicate that alterations of eight out of eleven identified genes might have an important role in pathogenesis of glial tumors, while detected changes in GP2, KCNG2 and KIR3DL3 should be considered as passenger mutations, since these genes are not expressed in glial cells. We assume that alterations of these three genes occur during clonal expansion of the genetically unstable tumor cells, and represent a consequence of detected significant level of genomic instability. [15]. Genetic alterations identified in our study are infrequent in TCGA database samples (http://tcga-portal.nci.nih.gov), and represent an addition to other multi-institutional studies reports.

Alterations of lipoma HMGIC fusion partner (LHFPL3) were more frequently detected in grade IV GBM, as well as in older patients and samples with high level of genomic instability which was shown to be present in de novo glial tumors [15]. This gene, located at the long arm of chromosome 13, acts as a translocation partner of HMGIC in lipoma with t(12;13) [26] and the latest work of Nagaishi et al. [27] showed association of its amplifications with mesenchymal differentiation in gliosarcoma. According to our results, multiple nucleotide substitutions detected in this gene could also have impact on glioma invasiveness, especially considering significantly shortened survival rate of the patients carrying these alterations.

On the other hand, alterations of SGCG, HTR4, ITGB1, CPS1, PROS1 and INPP5A were detected predominantly in anaplastic astrocytoma, while alterations of PDE4D were present in both glioblastoma subtypes. Most importantly, the majority of identified genes have a significant role in signal transduction or cell adhesion, the important processes for cancer development and progression, but were not previously associated with glioma pathogenesis. Namely, HTR4, and PDE4A are among key players in cAMP signaling [28], [29], while INPP5A regulates the level of another two secondary messengers, phosphatidylinositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate and inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate [30].

Inverse relation between cAMP levels and the degree of malignancy was already shown in several types of brain tumors [31], and overexpression of PDE4 was considered to be one of the main mechanisms for reduction of its intracellular level [32]. In our study, alterations of PDE4D were more frequently found in patients carrying wild-type p53 and p16 genes, indirectly suggesting that decrease of cAMP in glial tumors might be one of the mechanisms for regulation of the activity of these tumor suppressors.

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT) and its receptors also regulate cAMP production [33]. Alterations of HTR4 gene, frequently present in our set of samples, were not previously detected in glioma. On the other hand, there are several reports on different tumor types (breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer and adenocortical adenoma) indicating that tumor cells acquire alterations in the 5-HT signaling that favor tumor-promoting actions and have a fundamental role in tumor growth, differentiation and gene expression [34], [35].

As already mentioned, InsP3 5-phosphatase (INPP5A) functions mostly as a signal-terminating enzyme with implication for several cellular processes, including proliferation [36]. It was shown that loss of INPP5A was an early event in development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [37]. Speed et al. [38] showed that absence or loss of this enzyme activity was also associated with transformation of NRK cells, while Mengubas et al. [39] connected decrease of inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase activity with several human leukaemias.

INPP5A is located in the short arm of chromosome 10 (10q26.3), and LOH of this region represent the most frequent genetic abnormality in both primary and secondary GBM, due to the presence of multiple tumor suppressor genes in this chromosomal region [3], [40].

Our study also showed that alterations of INPP5A were significantly more frequent in samples without EGFR amplifications. This is in accordance with finding that chronic elevation of inositol phosphate in unstimulated human fibroblast cells leads to increase in basal calcium level and mitogenesis independently of growth factors [38].

Next, our results suggest that CPS1, one of the five key enzymes of the urea cycle [41] might also be aberrant in gliomas. Numerous point mutations and polymorphisms in this gene diversely affecting its biological function have been previously identified [42]. Altered expression of CPS1 was demonstrated in gastric cancer [43], hepatocellular carcinoma [44] and small-intestinal adenocarcinoma [45], but there are no data on glial tumors published so far. In our set of samples alterations of CPS1 were mainly found in grade III anaplastic astrocytoma with low level of genomic instability, suggesting potential role of this enzyme in neoplastic progression of secondary glioblastoma.

Protein products of SGCG and PROS1 are glycoproteins involved in cell adhesion [46], [47], while transmembrane receptor ITGB1 has additional important role in cell signaling and regulation of cell cycle [48]. Data about their role in cancer progression are scarce, consisting of a few reports on different types of cancer. Downregulation of SGCG was detected in NSCLC [49] and breast cancer [50], while Saraon et al. [51] revealed elevation of PROS1 in high grade aggressive prostate cancer. Contrary to this, PROS1 seems to be downregulated in anaplastic meningiomas [52]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that shows association between alterations of these two genes and glioma progression.

Integrin family members, due to their biological features, have numerous functions in cancer progression, especially in invasion and metastasis formation. The action of integrins has been studied in malignant melanoma, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer [53], [54], [55], [56]. There are also reports suggesting important roles of ITGB1 in glioma invasiveness and resistance to temozolomide treatment [57], which are in accordance with our findings.

Our results indicate that alterations of SGCG, PROS1 and ITGB1 genes appeared prevalently in grade III astrocytomas and resulted in shorter survival of patients, implying more aggressive nature of tumors with this genetic signature.

In conclusion, our study revealed that AP-PCR fingerprinting was extremely useful in the identification and characterization of the regions of glial tumor genome that have undergone alterations in comparison to their corresponding controls. Most importantly, we were able to identify genes associated with glioma pathogenesis, previously not related to this type of cancer. In particular, majority of identified genes play an important role in cell signaling, regulation of cell cycle, and cell adhesion, therefore participating in processes severely affected during malignant transformation. Further investigations of the detected genes on larger sample size, as well as in vitro studies, are under way, with special emphasize on clarifying the mechanisms of their action in progression of malignant glioma.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VM NT. Performed the experiments: VM JB TS. Analyzed the data: VM NT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MR MSG SR. Wrote the paper: VM NT.

References

  1. 1. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2012) The Definition of Primary and Secondary Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res.
  2. 2. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, et al. (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321: 1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382
  3. 3. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P (2007) Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 170: 1445–1453. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070011
  4. 4. TCGA (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455: 1061–1068. doi: 10.1038/nature11903
  5. 5. Ng K, Kim R, Kesari S, Carter B, Chen CC (2012) Genomic profiling of glioblastoma: convergence of fundamental biologic tenets and novel insights. J Neurooncol 107: 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0714-2
  6. 6. Gladson CL, Prayson RA, Liu WM (2010) The pathobiology of glioma tumors. Annu Rev Pathol 5: 33–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102109
  7. 7. Misra A, Chosdol K, Sarkar C, Mahapatra AK, Sinha S (2001) Alteration of a sequence with homology to human endogenous retrovirus (HERV-K) in primary human glioma: implications for viral repeat mediated rearrangement. Mutat Res 484: 53–59. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00240-8
  8. 8. Navarro JM, Jorcano JL (1999) The use of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction in cancer research. Electrophoresis 20: 283–290. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19990201)20:2<283::aid-elps283>3.0.co;2-n
  9. 9. Samuelsson JK, Alonso S, Yamamoto F, Perucho M (2010) DNA fingerprinting techniques for the analysis of genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer. Mutat Res 693: 61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.08.010
  10. 10. Achille A, Biasi MO, Zamboni G, Bogina G, Magalini AR, et al. (1996) Chromosome 7q allelic losses in pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 56: 3808–3813.
  11. 11. Luo L, Li B, Pretlow TP (2003) DNA alterations in human aberrant crypt foci and colon cancers by random primed polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res 63: 6166–6169.
  12. 12. Bankovic J, Stojsic J, Jovanovic D, Andjelkovic T, Milinkovic V, et al. (2010) Identification of genes associated with non-small-cell lung cancer promotion and progression. Lung Cancer 67: 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.04.010
  13. 13. De Juan C, Iniesta P, Cruces J, Sanchez A, Massa MJ, et al. (1999) DNA amplification on chromosome 6p12 in non small cell lung cancer detected by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. Int J Cancer 84: 344–349. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990820)84:4<344::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-d
  14. 14. Singh KP, Roy D (2001) Identification of novel breast tumor-specific mutation(s) in the q11.2 region of chromosome 17 by RAPD/AP-PCR fingerprinting. Gene 269: 33–43. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00458-9
  15. 15. Milinkovic V, Bankovic J, Rakic M, Milosevic N, Stankovic T, et al. (2012) Genomic instability and p53 alterations in patients with malignant glioma. Exp Mol Pathol 93: 200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.05.010
  16. 16. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, et al. (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114: 97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4
  17. 17. Sambrook (1989) Molecular cloning.
  18. 18. Micheli MR, Bova R (1997) Fingerprinting methods based on arbitrarily primed PCR. Berlin ; Barcelona etc.: Springer. XVI, 442 p. p.
  19. 19. McClelland M, Welsh J (1994) DNA fingerprinting by arbitrarily primed PCR. PCR Methods Appl 4: S59–65. doi: 10.1101/gr.4.1.s59
  20. 20. Markovic J, Stojsic J, Zunic S, Ruzdijic S, Tanic N (2008) Genomic instability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer assessed by the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Invest 26: 262–268. doi: 10.1080/07357900701708385
  21. 21. Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 2766–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2766
  22. 22. Andjelkovic T, Bankovic J, Stojsic J, Milinkovic V, Podolski-Renic A, et al. (2011) Coalterations of p53 and PTEN tumor suppressor genes in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. Transl Res 157: 19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.09.004
  23. 23. Hahn M, Wieland I, Koufaki ON, Gorgens H, Sobottka SB, et al. (1999) Genetic alterations of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN/MMAC1 in human brain metastases. Clin Cancer Res 5: 2431–2437.
  24. 24. Mead LJ, Gillespie MT, Hung JY, Rane US, Rayeroux KC, et al. (1997) Frequent loss of heterozygosity in early non-small cell lung cancers at chromosome 9p21 proximal to the CDKN2a gene. Int J Cancer 71: 213–217. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970410)71:2<213::aid-ijc15>3.0.co;2-i
  25. 25. Hayashi Y, Iwato M, Arakawa Y, Fujisawa H, Thoma Y, et al. (2001) Homozygous deletion of INK4a/ARF genes and overexpression of bcl-2 in relation with poor prognosis in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma of the diffuse large B-cell type. J Neurooncol 55: 51–58.
  26. 26. Petit MM, Schoenmakers EF, Huysmans C, Geurts JM, Mandahl N, et al. (1999) LHFP, a novel translocation partner gene of HMGIC in a lipoma, is a member of a new family of LHFP-like genes. Genomics 57: 438–441. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5778
  27. 27. Nagaishi M, Kim YH, Mittelbronn M, Giangaspero F, Paulus W, et al. (2012) Amplification of the STOML3, FREM2, and LHFP genes is associated with mesenchymal differentiation in gliosarcoma. Am J Pathol 180: 1816–1823. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.027
  28. 28. Noda M, Higashida H, Aoki S, Wada K (2004) Multiple signal transduction pathways mediated by 5-HT receptors. Mol Neurobiol 29: 31–39. doi: 10.1385/mn:29:1:31
  29. 29. Conti M, Richter W, Mehats C, Livera G, Park JY, et al. (2003) Cyclic AMP-specific PDE4 phosphodiesterases as critical components of cyclic AMP signaling. J Biol Chem 278: 5493–5496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.r200029200
  30. 30. Majerus PW (1996) Inositols do it all. Genes Dev 10: 1051–1053. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.9.1051
  31. 31. Furman MA, Shulman K (1977) Cyclic AMP and adenyl cyclase in brain tumors. J Neurosurg 46: 477–483. doi: 10.3171/jns.1977.46.4.0477
  32. 32. Goldhoff P, Warrington NM, Limbrick DD Jr, Hope A, Woerner BM, et al. (2008) Targeted inhibition of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase-4 promotes brain tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res 14: 7717–7725. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0827
  33. 33. Siddiqui EJ, Thompson CS, Mikhailidis DP, Mumtaz FH (2005) The role of serotonin in tumour growth (review). Oncol Rep 14: 1593–1597. doi: 10.3892/or.14.6.1593
  34. 34. Pai VP, Marshall AM, Hernandez LL, Buckley AR, Horseman ND (2009) Altered serotonin physiology in human breast cancers favors paradoxical growth and cell survival. Breast Cancer Res 11: R81. doi: 10.1186/bcr2448
  35. 35. Cartier D, Jegou S, Parmentier F, Lihrmann I, Louiset E, et al. (2005) Expression profile of serotonin4 (5-HT4) receptors in adrenocortical aldosterone-producing adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 153: 939–947. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02051
  36. 36. Mitchell CA, Gurung R, Kong AM, Dyson JM, Tan A, et al. (2002) Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases: lipid phosphatases with flair. IUBMB Life 53: 25–36. doi: 10.1080/15216540210815
  37. 37. Sekulic A, Kim SY, Hostetter G, Savage S, Einspahr JG, et al. (2010) Loss of inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase is an early event in development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3: 1277–1283. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0058
  38. 38. Speed CJ, Little PJ, Hayman JA, Mitchell CA (1996) Underexpression of the 43 kDa inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase is associated with cellular transformation. EMBO J 15: 4852–4861.
  39. 39. Mengubas K, Jabbar SA, Nye KE, Wilkes S, Hoffbrand AV, et al. (1994) Inactivation of calcium ion-regulating inositol polyphosphate second messengers is impaired in subpopulations of human leukemia cells. Leukemia 8: 1718–1725.
  40. 40. Ichimura K, Schmidt EE, Miyakawa A, Goike HM, Collins VP (1998) Distinct patterns of deletion on 10p and 10q suggest involvement of multiple tumor suppressor genes in the development of astrocytic gliomas of different malignancy grades. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 22: 9–15. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199805)22:1<9::aid-gcc2>3.0.co;2-1
  41. 41. Mitchell S, Ellingson C, Coyne T, Hall L, Neill M, et al. (2009) Genetic variation in the urea cycle: a model resource for investigating key candidate genes for common diseases. Hum Mutat 30: 56–60. doi: 10.1002/humu.20813
  42. 42. Martinez AI, Perez-Arellano I, Pekkala S, Barcelona B, Cervera J (2010) Genetic, structural and biochemical basis of carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 101: 311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.08.002
  43. 43. Liu TH, Li DC, Gu CF, Ye SF (1989) Carbamyl phosphate synthetase I. A novel marker for gastric carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 102: 630–638.
  44. 44. Liu H, Dong H, Robertson K, Liu C (2011) DNA methylation suppresses expression of the urea cycle enzyme carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol 178: 652–661. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.023
  45. 45. Cardona DM, Zhang X, Liu C (2009) Loss of carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I in small-intestinal adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 132: 877–882. doi: 10.1309/ajcp74xgrfwtflju
  46. 46. Ozawa E, Mizuno Y, Hagiwara Y, Sasaoka T, Yoshida M (2005) Molecular and cell biology of the sarcoglycan complex. Muscle Nerve 32: 563–576. doi: 10.1002/mus.20349
  47. 47. Dahlback B (2007) The tale of protein S and C4b-binding protein, a story of affection. Thromb Haemost 98: 90–96. doi: 10.1160/th07-04-0269
  48. 48. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E (1999) Integrin signaling. Science 285: 1028–1032. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5430.1028
  49. 49. Valk K, Vooder T, Kolde R, Reintam MA, Petzold C, et al. (2010) Gene expression profiles of non-small cell lung cancer: survival prediction and new biomarkers. Oncology 79: 283–292. doi: 10.1159/000322116
  50. 50. Arco A, Favaloro A, Gioffre M, Santoro G, Speciale F, et al. (2012) Sarcoglycans in the normal and pathological breast tissue of humans: an immunohistochemical and molecular study. Cells Tissues Organs 195: 550–562. doi: 10.1159/000329508
  51. 51. Saraon P, Musrap N, Cretu D, Karagiannis GS, Batruch I, et al. (2012) Proteomic profiling of androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines reveals a role for protein S during the development of high grade and castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 287: 34019–34031. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m112.384438
  52. 52. Fevre-Montange M, Champier J, Durand A, Wierinckx A, Honnorat J, et al. (2009) Microarray gene expression profiling in meningiomas: differential expression according to grade or histopathological subtype. Int J Oncol 35: 1395–1407. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000457
  53. 53. Hieken TJ, Ronan SG, Farolan M, Shilkaitis AL, Das Gupta TK (1996) Beta 1 integrin expression: a marker of lymphatic metastases in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Anticancer Res 16: 2321–2324. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(05)80034-0
  54. 54. Zutter MM, Krigman HR, Santoro SA (1993) Altered integrin expression in adenocarcinoma of the breast. Analysis by in situ hybridization. Am J Pathol 142: 1439–1448.
  55. 55. Perlino E, Lovecchio M, Vacca RA, Fornaro M, Moro L, et al. (2000) Regulation of mRNA and protein levels of beta1 integrin variants in human prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 157: 1727–1734. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64809-2
  56. 56. Grzesiak JJ, Tran Cao HS, Burton DW, Kaushal S, Vargas F, et al. (2011) Knockdown of the beta(1) integrin subunit reduces primary tumor growth and inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis. Int J Cancer 129: 2905–2915. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25942
  57. 57. Janouskova H, Maglott A, Leger DY, Bossert C, Noulet F, et al. (2012) Integrin alpha5beta1 plays a critical role in resistance to temozolomide by interfering with the p53 pathway in high-grade glioma. Cancer Res 72: 3463–3470. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-4199