Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Circadian Binding of CLOCK Protein to the Promoter of C/ebpα Gene in Mouse Cells

  • Haruhisa Kawasaki ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Haruhisa Kawasaki, Ryosuke Doi

    Affiliation Ishida Group of Clock Gene, Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (AIST) 6-5 Central, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

  • Ryosuke Doi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Haruhisa Kawasaki, Ryosuke Doi

    Affiliations Ishida Group of Clock Gene, Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (AIST) 6-5 Central, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, Division of Cell Physiology, Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan

  • Kumpei Ito,

    Affiliations Ishida Group of Clock Gene, Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (AIST) 6-5 Central, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

  • Masami Shimoda,

    Affiliation Division of Insect Sciences, National Institute of Agrobiological Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

  • Norio Ishida

    n.ishida@aist.go.jp

    Affiliations Ishida Group of Clock Gene, Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (AIST) 6-5 Central, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Abstract

C/EBPα plays important roles in metabolism as well as in the maintenance of energy homeostasis. Here we describe loss of the circadian oscillation of C/ebpα expression in liver of Clock mutant mice. Reporter assays indicate Clock and Bmal significantly induced C/ebpα gene expression whereas Cry suppressed. Real time reporter assays showed that two mutated E-boxes disrupted C/ebpα promoter dependent-oscillation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation suggests Clock can bind to two E-boxes in the C/ebpα promoter with a circadian manner in vivo. Thus, C/ebpα gene transcription is under circadian control of a core clock component, Clock. The data suggests that circadian disturbances may affect metabolic abnormalities through the C/ebpα pathway in liver.

Introduction

Many organisms display physiological and behavioral rhythms of entrainment to a 24-h cycle of light and darkness. The master clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of mammals controls most physical and physiological circadian rhythmicity [1], [2] and the generation of circadian rhythms depends on the concerted co-expression of specific clock genes. Clock was the first clock gene identified in vertebrates [3]. CLOCK binds DNA and activates transcription after dimerization with BMAL1 [1], [2] by driving the rhythmic transcription of other clock and circadian clock-controlled genes through an E-box (CACGTG). Because the Clock allele of Clock mutant mice is truncated and causes a deletion of 51 amino acids, the mutation presumably would not significantly affect N-terminal basic helix-loop-helix and Per-Arnt-Sim domains, leaving CLOCK dimerization and DNA binding intact. The mutant CLOCK protein can still form heterodimers with BMAL1 that binds to DNA, but these heterodimers are deficient during transactivation [2]. The mammalian circadian clock is an intracellular, transcriptional-translational mechanism comprising the same molecular components in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and in peripheral cells. Because this endogenous timekeeper interacts with countless biological systems, circadian disruption has significant effects on health; for example, susceptibility to obesity, diabetes and related metabolic syndromes and various types of cancer is increased among long-term shift workers [4].

The founder of the family of related leucine zipper transcription factors is CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), which plays an important role in numerous cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, metabolic control and other specific functions [5][8]. This gene is expressed at high levels in the liver and it is critical for the establishment and maintenance of energy homeostasis in neonates [9], [10]. C/ebpα gene knockout mice die because they cannot accumulate glycogen in the liver and develop hypoglycemia [10].

Hundreds of tissue-specific circadian genes that regulate an impressive diversity of biological processes have been identified using DNA microarray technology [11][14], and we found that C/ebpα is one of circadian expressing gene candidates that have been screened from Database of Circadian Gene Expression (http://expression.gnf.org/cgi-bin/circadian/index.cgi) and Database for Systems Biology (http://sirius.cdb.riken.jp/). Some studies have shown that mutations or deletions of Clock and Bmal1 genes result in not only circadian disturbances but also disrupted glucose and lipid metabolism [15][18]. In fact, recent reports indicate that C/EBPα directly controls Per2 and Rev-Erbα, which are core members of clock genes for the circadian clock [19], [20]. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of circadian oscillation of C/ebpα gene expression.

We identified E-boxes in the C/ebpα promoter region investigated the relationship between C/ebpα and clock genes. Here, we show that the core clock gene product CLOCK regulates the circadian expression of C/ebpα gene in mouse cells.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All animal experiments, care and handling proceeded under the approval of our institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Permission Number 2009–020).

Animals

Male Jcl:ICR (Clea Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and homozygous Clock mutant mice on a Jcl:ICR background [21] aged 7–10 weeks were maintained under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (lights on at 0∶00 and lights off at 12∶00) for at least two weeks before experimentation. The mice were fasted overnight and sequentially sacrificed for some experiments.

Isolation of mRNA and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from NIH 3T3 cells or liver tissue using RNAiso (TAKARA Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) and then reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TAKARA Bio) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 3 animals were used per each time. The cDNA levels of genes of interest were measured by real time quantitative PCR using a LightCycler (Roche Applied Science) with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TAKARA Bio). The amount of mRNA was corrected relative to that of β-actin for liver tissue or Large Ribosome Protein (Rplpo) for NIH 3T3 cells. The maximal value for wild type mice is expressed as 100% and other values are expressed means ±SEM (n = 3).

Cell Culture

NIH3T3 cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and a mixture of penicillin and streptomycin at 37°C under a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Transient Luciferase Assays

The upstream region of the C/ebpα transcription start site containing two (−1386 to +113 bp) E-boxes were cloned into the pGL3 Basic vector (Promega). Mouse CLOCK, BMAL1, and CRY1 expression plasmids were provided by Dr. T. Todo [22]. Constructs (500 ng) were co-transfected with 1 ng of pRL-CMV (Promega) as the internal control into NIH3T3 cells (24-well plates) using HilyMax (DOJINDO Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Luciferase activities were measured using a dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and a Luminometer model TD-20/20 (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). The transcriptional activities were normalized relative to Renilla luciferase activities.

Real time Luciferase Assays

The upstream region of the C/ebpα transcription start site containing two E-boxes (−1386 to +113 bp) was cloned into SV40-dLuc harboring the SV-40 promoter and a rapid degradation domain modified from mouse ornithine decarboxylase at the C-terminal end of firefly luciferase [13]. The Per2 promoter regions (−798 to +331 relative to the cap site) were cloned into pGL3-dLuc [23], and then 2 µg of reporter plasmids were transfected into NIH3T3 cells (35-mm collagen type I-coated dishes) using HilyMax (DOJINDO Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). The cells were stimulated with 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h in serum-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (D-MEM) and then the medium was replaced with fresh Dulbecco’s MEM containing 100 µM luciferin (Wako Pure Chemical Industries), 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), and 10% fetal bovine serum. Bioluminescence was measured and integrated for 1 min at intervals of 10 min using the Photon Detection UNIT LM-2400 (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). To compare the phase and amplitude of C/ebpα -WT-dLuc and each mutant, the data were detrended by subtracting an average of 12 h from the data.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assays

Immunoprecipitation was adapted from the reported procedure [24], [25]. NIH 3T3 cells were stimulated with dexamethasone and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Formaldehyde was added directly to cell culture media at a final concentration of 1% at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 or 30 h thereafter. Cross-linking was stopped by adding 125 mM glycine. The plates were rinsed with cold PBS and then NIH 3T3 cells harvested by scraping in 0.4 mL of ice cold 10 mM PMSF in PBS were sedimented by centrifugation. Binding between CLOCK and E-boxes was detected using the Simple ChIP Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) with anti-CLOCK antibody [26](SC-6927; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, CA, USA) according to the product insert. Sample DNA was isolated from the immunoprecipitates and then amplified by PCR using the following primer sets: E1 site (from −1240 to −1128), 5′-GAGGGTGAACGAGACGCCACGTGGCTGGGAGCCGATGC-3′ and 5′-GCCTTTCGAGCACCCACTTGGG- 3′; E2 site (from −295 to −137), 5′-GCCTAACCACGGACCACGTGTGTGCGGGGGCGACAGCG-3′ and 5′-TGACTTTCCAAGGCGGTGAGTGGG-3′; E-box unrelated sequence (from −2239 to −2063), 5′-TGACCGGTTCCACCTCTAAC-3′ and 5′-CAGGGGTTCGTGAGAAATGT-3′; and the most proximal E-box of Dbp [27], [28], 5′-ACACCCGCATCCGATAGC-3′ and 5′- CCACTTCGGGCCAATGAG-3′.

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as means ± SEM. Differences in expression levels and peak times were statistically evaluated using Student’s t-test for single comparisons and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Student’s t-test for multiple comparisons.

Results

Oscillatory Expression of C/ebpα mRNA in Mouse Liver

Since C/ebpα is essential for liver development, we isolated C/ebpα mRNA from livers of wild-type and Clock mutant mouse to determine the relationship between the circadian clock and temporal C/ebpα gene expression using RT-PCR (Fig. 1). Diurnal expression of C/ebpα mRNA was robust in the liver of wild-type mice, but rhythmic expression was significantly dampened in those from Clock mutant mice. The C/ebpα mRNA levels obviously peaked at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 8 in the wild type liver.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Clock mutation damps daily variation in C/ebpα mRNA expression.

Total RNA was extracted from the livers of three wild-type (WT; open symbols) and three Clock mutant (Clk; closed symbols) mice maintained under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (lights on at 0∶00 and lights off at 12∶00) and then C/ebpα expression was determined by RT-PCR. Maximal value for wild-type mice is expressed as 100%. Each time point comes from average of three mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3, *: p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.g001

CLOCK Up-regulates C/ebpα Expression in vitro

Analysis of the mouse genome revealed two perfect E-box motifs within 1.4 kb of the 5′-flanking region of the C/ebpα gene (Fig. 2A), suggesting that clock gene products may control C/ebpα. We therefore analyzed the functions of these E-box elements using a genomic DNA sequence of this region fused to the luciferase reporter plasmid (Fig. 2B). The promoter reporter assay showed that the transcriptional activity of a 1.4 kb fragment containing the two E-boxes was increased 3-fold under CLOCK and BMAL1 overexpression in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 2C). This increase was suppressed by co-expression with CRY1, which is the negative component of CLOCK-BMAL1-dependent transcriptional activation [1]. The findings suggest that a feedback loop of the molecular circadian clock may regulate the upstream region of C/ebpα containing these two E-boxes.

thumbnail
Figure 2. CLOCK and BMAL1 up-regulate the expression of C/ebpα promoter.

(A) Comparison of mouse rat and human C/ebpα E-boxes. C/ebpα promoter contains two putative E-boxes within 1.4 kb region upstream of transcription start site. Consensus E-box sequences are shown in bold type. Positions from transcription start sites are shown in parentheses. This figure is based on information derived from the Mammalian Promoter/Enhancer Database (http://promoter.cdb.riken.jp/). (B) Schematic representation of reporter gene and constructs of C/ebpαpromoter region. Plasmid pGL3-1400 contains 1.4 kb upstream region of the C/ebpα transcription start site. Plasmid pGL3-BASIC does not contain C/ebpα promoter region. (C) Reporter gene assay for C/ebpα promoter. CLOCK, BMAL1 and CRY1 are overexpressed with the reporter constructs in NIH 3T3. pGL3-1400 reporter was up-regulated by CLOCK and BMAL1 then CRY1 supressed the expression. Each column comes from triplicate experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3, *: p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.g002

Upstream E1 and E2 Sites Regulate the Circadian Expression of C/ebpα Gene

We analyzed the roles of the two E-boxes in circadian expression of the C/ebpα gene using real time reporter assays with NIH3T3 cells containing functional circadian clock components. The transcriptional activity of the construct containing two E-boxes (Fig. 3A; pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-WT) exhibited circadian oscillation (Fig. 3B; Left upper). When E1 or E2 site was mutated (Fig. 3A; pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut I, pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut II), circadianoscillations of the reporter activity was still observed although with abnormal phase when E1 or E2 site was mutated (Fig. 3B; Upper right and Left lower). In contrast, mutations in both of E-boxes (Fig. 3A; pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut I-II) disrupted the circadian oscillation of the reporter activity (Fig. 3B; Lower right). These findings show that both of the E1 and E2 sites are involved in circadian expression of the C/ebpα reporter gene in NIH3T3 cells.

thumbnail
Figure 3. E1 and E2 sites contribute to circadian expression of C/ebpα.

(A) Schematic representation of mutant constructs of C/ebpα promoter region. Either or both E-boxes (sites E1 and E2) were mutated (E1, 5′-CACGTG-3′ to 5′-CACCAC-3′; E2, 5′-CACGTG-3′ to 5′-CACCAC-3′). (B) Real time reporter assay. NIH3T3 cells transfected with indicated mutant constructs were incubated with dexamethasone (100 nM) and then bioluminescence was measured. Plasmid pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-WT, wild type 1.4 kb upstream region of C/ebpα gene;, pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut I, mutant E1 site; pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut II, mutant E2 site; pGL3-dLuc-Cebp-Mut I-II, mutant E1 and E2 sites; mPer2-dLuc, Per2 promoter region (−798 to +331 relative to the cap site) cloned into pGL3-dLuc [23]. Each experiment was repeated 3-5 times and representative data were used for these graphs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.g003

CLOCK Binds to E-boxes in C/ebpα Control Region in Living Cells

We analyzed in vivo binding of CLOCK for the putative DNA sequence using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in NIH 3T3 cells. To confirm the validity of this anti-CLOCK antibody for ChIP in 3T3 cells, we evaluated CLOCK binding to-E box element in Dbp (D site albumin promoter binding protein) as a positive control (Fig. S1). We found that CLOCK bound to both fragments of the C/ebpα 5′-flanking region that contain E-boxes (Fig. 4A). CLOCK binding to two E-boxes was detected in a circadian manner and peaked at 18 hour after dexamethasone treatment. In contrast, E-box unrelated sequence in upstream region has consistently detected very low binding with CLOCK (Negative control). We also determined temporal expression of endogenous C/ebpα by using RT-PCR and confirmed its circadian oscillation (Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that CLOCK protein bind to two E-boxes of the C/ebpα promoter in NIH 3T3 cells at the chromatin level and suggest that CLOCK controls the circadian expression of C/ebpα gene through these two E-boxes even in living cells.

thumbnail
Figure 4. CLOCK binds to E1 and E2 sites in living cell.

(A) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay for CLOCK and E-boxes of C/ebpα promoter. E-box sites are shown as ovals on the schematic. Horizontal bars indicate amplified regions (E-box unrelated sequence, from −2239 to −2063; E1 site, from −1240 to −1128; E2 site, from −295 to −137.) NIH 3T3 cells were rapidly sampled and processed every 6 hours after dexamethasone stimulation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed using antibodies against CLOCK, and enrichment of E-boxes containing sequence of the promoter region of C/ebpα were measured using quantitative PCR. Data were normalized to a control condition (Normal Rabbit IgG). The ChIP assay was repeated two times. Each time point comes from triplicate experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3, *: p<0.0001). (B) Temporal mRNA expression of endogenous C/ebpα in NIH 3T3.Total RNA was extracted every 6 hours after dexamethasone stimulation and mRNA transcripts were quantitated relative to Rplpo transcript expression (housekeeping gene) by using quantitative RT-PCR. Each time point comes from triplicate experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3, *: p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.g004

Discussion

Here, we discovered that the circadian expression of C/ebpα gene was regulated by two E-boxes in the upstream region of this gene through the core clock protein, CLOCK. Considering with transient luciferase assays, real-time reporter assays in vitro, and ChIP assays and loss of circadian mRNA expression in Clock mutant mouse liver, the data indicates that the molecular circadian feedback loop affects C/ebpα gene circadian expression through two E-boxes. C/ebpα protein is thought to play important roles in numerous cellular processes including cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [5][8]. But, C/ebpα gene is expressed at high levels in the liver and recent reports show that it is critical for the establishment and maintenance of energy homeostasis in mammals [9][10]. Furthermore, the core clock proteins are reported to affect energy homeostasis in many species [29]. Genome-wide screening of BMAL1 and CLOCK targets has confirmed that carbohydrate and lipid metabolism comprises the major output of the circadian clock in the mouse liver [14], [30], [31].

Duplicate E-boxes were reported to be important for the circadian rhythmic mRNA expression of clock-controlled genes [30], [32]. We also found two E-boxes are required to generate the distinct circadian oscillation of Gys2 (Glycogen synthase 2) gene expression in mouse liver [25]. These papers suggest that two E-boxes system are important for the circadian expression of clock-controlled genes in peripheral tissues. In this paper, ChIP assay and real time reporter assay indicated that the binding peak of CLOCK to E-boxes preceded the peak expression of endogenous C/ebpα in NIH 3T3 cell. This suggests that CLOCK binding in vivo might occur earlier than transcription. Furthermore, CLOCK binds to Dbp promoter in a similar fashion (Figure S1), [27]. This also suggests that CLOCK binds to C/ebpα promoter in a circadian manner.

Our findings suggest that C/ebpα is one of clock-controlled genes regulated by the circadian negative feedback (Oval in Figure 5). Interestingly, others have reported that the Per2 promoter region has several potential C/ebpα binding sites to activate Per2 transcription [19], [20] (Dotted line in Figure 5). Furthermore, previous papers indicate that Per2 and C/ebpα have the same effects for tumor suppression events [19], [20]. Thus, we propose an interactive feedback loop between the negative feedback loop and C/ebpα rhythmic expression (Figure 5). Recently, the circadian expression of the gene encoding glycogen synthase was found to be damped in livers of C/ebpα conditional-knockout mice [33]. These data support that glucose metabolism might be involved in an interactive feedback loop in livers.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Links between C/ebpα and Clock gene expressions.

An interactive feedback loop between C/ebpα and the core clock genes feedback loop is indicated. The core clock genes feedback loop is enclosed in an oval. Transcriptional activators CLOCK and BMAL1 drive Per2 and C/ebpα gene expression. Per and CRY proteins inhibit CLOCK/BMAL1 activity. Thick line denotes regulation based on present findings. Dotted arrow comes from other papers [20], [21].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.g005

Recent studies have revealed an association between the circadian clock disruption and metabolic syndrome [28], [33][35]. The C/ebpα gene has divergent roles and functions, especially in glucose metabolism [10], [35], [36]. These findings also suggest close links between the circadian clock-controlled gene, C/ebpα and metabolic activity. We propose that disrupted clock genes expression may cause metabolic syndrome through deregulation of C/ebpα.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

ChIP assay for CLOCK binding to Dbp promoter. Binding activity between CLOCK and E box element in Dbp (D site albumin promoter binding protein) promoter sequence was evaluated to confirm the validity of our ChIP assay. Experiment was performed as described in the materials and methods. Each time point comes from triplicate experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3, *: p = 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058221.s001

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HK RD NI. Performed the experiments: HK RD. Analyzed the data: HK RD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HK RD KI MS NI. Wrote the paper: HK.

References

  1. 1. Pando MP, Sassone-Corsi P (2001) Molecular clocks. AA vivid loop of light. Nature 410: 311–313.
  2. 2. Reppert SM, Weaver DR (2001) Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Physiol 63: 647–676.
  3. 3. Vitaterna MH, King DP, Chang AM, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, et al. (1994) Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science 264: 719–725.
  4. 4. Reddy AB, O’Neill JS (2010) Healthy clocks, healthy body, healthy mind. Trends Cell Biol 20: 36–44.
  5. 5. Tenen DG, Hromas R, Licht JD, Zhang DE (1997) Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 90: 489–519.
  6. 6. Rosmarin AG, Yang Z, Resendes KK (2005) Transcription regulation in myelopoiesis: hematopoietic fate choice, myeloid differentiation, and leukemogenesis. Exp Hematol 33: 131–143.
  7. 7. Friedman AD, Keefer JR, Kummalue T, Liu H, Wang GF, et al. (2003) Regulation of granulocyte and monocyte differentiation by CCAAT/enhance binding protein a. Blood Cells Mol Dis 31: 338–341.
  8. 8. Lu Y, Chen W, Chen W, Stein A, Weiss LM, et al. (2010) C/EBPA gene mutation and C/EBPA promoter hypermethylation in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics. Am J Hematol 85: 426–430.
  9. 9. Westmacott A, Burke ZD, Oliver G, Slack JM, Tosh D (2006) C/EBPα and C/EBPβ are markers of early liver development. Int J Dev Biol 50: 653–657.
  10. 10. Wang ND, Finegold MJ, Bradley A, Ou CN, Abdelsayed SV, et al. (1995) Impaired energy homeostasis in C/EBP alpha knockout mice. Science 269: 1108–1112.
  11. 11. Akhtar RA, Reddy AB, Maywood ES, Clayton JD, King VM, et al. (2002) Circadian cycling of the mouse liver transcriptome, as revealed by cDNA microarray, is driven by the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Curr Biol 12: 540–550.
  12. 12. Panda S, Antoch MP, Miller BH, Su AL, Schook AB, et al. (2002) Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 109: 307–320.
  13. 13. Ueda HR, Chen W, Adachi A, Wakamatsu H, Hayashi S, et al. (2002) A transcription factor response element for gene expression during circadian night. Nature 418: 534–539.
  14. 14. Oishi K, Miyazaki K, Kadota K, Kikuno R, Nagase T, et al. (2003) Genome-wide expression analysis of mouse liver reveals CLOCK-regulated circadian output genes. J Biol Chem 278: 41519–41527.
  15. 15. Turek FW, Joshu C, Kohsaka A, Lin E, Ivanova G, et al. (2005) Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian Clock mutant mice. Science 308: 1043–1045.
  16. 16. Rudic RD, McNamara P, Curtis AM, Boston RC, Panda S, et al. (2004) BMAL1 and CLOCK, two essential components of the circadian clock, are involved in glucose homeostasis. PLoS Biol 2: e377.
  17. 17. Lamia KA, Storch KF, Weitz CJ (2008) Physiological significance of a peripheral tissue circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 15172–15177.
  18. 18. Oishi K, Atsumi G, Sugiyama S, Kodomari I, Kasamatsu M, et al. (2006) Disrupted fat absorption attenuates obesity induced by a high-fat diet in Clock mutant mice. FEBS Lett 580: 127–130.
  19. 19. Gery S, Gombart AF, Yi WS, Koeffler C, Hofmann WK, et al. (2005) Transcription profiling of C/EBP targets identifies Per2 as a gene implicated in myeloid leukemia. Blood 106: 2827–2836.
  20. 20. Gery S, Koeffler HP (2009) Per2 is a C/EBP target gene implicated in myeloid leukemia. Integr Cancer Ther 8: 317–320.
  21. 21. Oishi K, Miyazaki K, Ishida N (2002) Functional CLOCK is not involved in the entrainment of peripheral clocks to the restricted feeding: entrainable expression of mPer2 and BMAL1 mRNAs in the heart of Clock mutant mice on Jcl:ICR background. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 298: 198–202.
  22. 22. Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa T, Hirayama J, Daiyasu H, Kanai S, et al. (2000) Molecular analysis of zebrafish photolyase/cryptochrome family: two types of cryptochromes present in zebrafish. Genes Cells 5: 725–738.
  23. 23. Ohno T, Onishi Y, Ishida N (2007) A novel E4BP4 element drives circadian expression of mPeriod2. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 648–655.
  24. 24. Boyd KE, Wells J, Gutman J, Bartley SM, Farnham PJ (1998) c-Myc target gene specificity is determined by a post-DNA binding mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 13887–13892.
  25. 25. Doi R, Oishi K, Ishida N (2010) CLOCK regulates circadian rhythms of hepatic glycogen synthesis through transcriptional activation of Gys2. J Biol Chem 285: 22114–22121.
  26. 26. Nakashima A, Kawamoto T, Honda KK, Ueshima T, Noshiro M, et al. (2008) DEC1 Modulates the Circadian Phase of Clock Gene Expression. Mol Cell Biol 28: 4080–4092.
  27. 27. Mongrain V, Spada LF, Curie T, Franken P (2011) Sleep loss reduces the DNA-binding of BMAL1, CLOCK, and NPAS2 to specific cloc genes in the mouse cerebral cortex. PLoS ONE 6: e26622.
  28. 28. Ripperger JA, Shearman LP, Reppert SM, Schibler U (2000) CLOCK, an essential pacemaker component, controls expression of the circadian transcription factor DBP. Genes Dev 14: 679–689.
  29. 29. Ishida N (2007) Circadian clock, cancer and lipid metabolism. Neuroscience Research 57: 483–490.
  30. 30. Rey G, Cesbron F, Rougemont J, Reinke H, Brunner M, et al. (2011) Genome-wide and phase-specific DNA-binding rhythms of BMAL1 control circadian output functions in mouse liver. PLoS Biol 9: e1000595.
  31. 31. Koike N, Yoo S, Huang H, Kumar V, Lee C, et al. (2012) Transcriptional Architecture and Chromatin Landscape of the Core Circadian Clock in Mammals. Science 338: 349–354.
  32. 32. Nakahata Y, Yoshida M, Takano A, Soma H, Yamamoto T, et al. (2008) A direct repeat of E-box-like elements is required for cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of clock genes. BMC Mol Biol 9: 1.
  33. 33. Lee YH, Sauer B, Johnson PF, Gonzalez FJ (1997) Disruption of the c/ebpα gene in adult mouse liver. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6014–6022.
  34. 34. Turek FW, Joshu C, Kohsaka A, Lin E, Ivanova G, et al. (2005) Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadian Clock mutant mice. Science 308: 1043–10435.
  35. 35. Ando H, Ushijima K, Yanagihara H, Hayashi Y, Takamura T, et al. (2009) Clock gene expression in the liver and adipose tissues of non-obese type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Clin Exp Hypertens 31: 201–207.
  36. 36. Delgado-Lista J, Perez-Martinez P, Garcia-Rios A, Phillips CM, Hall W, et al.. (2012) A gene variation (rs12691) in the CCAT/enhancer binding protein α modulates glucose metabolism in metabolic syndrome. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis: In press.