Advertisement
Research Article

Apocrine-Eccrine Carcinomas: Molecular and Immunohistochemical Analyses

  • Long P. Le,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Dora Dias-Santagata,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Amanda C. Pawlak,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Arjola K. Cosper,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Anh Thu Nguyen,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • M. Angelica Selim,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America

    X
  • April Deng,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts (UMass) Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Nora K. Horick,

    Affiliation: Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • A. John Iafrate,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Martin C. Mihm Jr,

    Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Mai P. Hoang mail

    mhoang@partners.org

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

    X
  • Published: October 09, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047290

Abstract

Apocrine-eccrine carcinomas are rare and associated with poor prognosis. Currently there is no uniform treatment guideline. Chemotherapeutic drugs that selectively target cancer-promoting pathways may complement conventional therapeutic approaches. However, studies on genetic alterations and EGFR and Her2 status of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas are few in number. In addition, hormonal studies have not been comprehensive and performed only on certain subsets of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas. To investigate whether apocrine-eccrine carcinomas express hormonal receptors or possess activation of oncogenic pathways that can be targeted by available chemotherapeutic agent we performed immunohistochemistry for AR, PR, ER, EGFR, and HER2 expression; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for EGFR and ERBB2 gene amplification; and molecular analyses for recurrent mutations in 15 cancer genes including AKT-1, EGFR, PIK3CA, and TP53 on 54 cases of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas. They include 10 apocrine carcinomas, 7 eccrine carcinomas, 9 aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinomas, 10 hidradenocarcinomas, 11 porocarcinomas, 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma, 4 malignant chondroid syringomas, 1 malignant spiradenoma, and 1 malignant cylindroma. AR, ER, PR, EGFR and HER2 expression was seen in 36% (19/53), 27% (14/51), 16% (8/51), 85% (44/52) and 12% (6/52), respectively. Polysomy or trisomy of EGFR was detected by FISH in 30% (14/46). Mutations of AKT-1, PIK3CA, and TP53 were detected in 1, 3, and 7 cases, respectively (11/47, 23%). Additional investigation regarding the potential treatment of rare cases of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas with PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors, currently in clinical testing, may be of clinical interest.

Introduction

In a recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of cutaneous appendageal carcinomas; apocrine-eccrine, follicular, and sebaceous carcinomas were the three main categories cited in the consensus classification after taking into account the clinical, histologic, and molecular genetic features [1]. Apocrine-eccrine carcinomas are rare and associated with poor prognosis [2][4]. Three of nine cases of clear cell eccrine carcinomas reported by Wong et al. [4] developed metastases despite local excision, radiation, and chemotherapy. In the largest series of 69 cases of porocarcinomas by Robson et al. [3], 17% and 19% experienced local recurrence and lymph node metastases, respectively. In recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute data from 1978 through 2005, the incidence rate of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas was reported to be 2.6 per 1 million person-years [2]. The five-year relative survival rates for apocrine-eccrine carcinomas were 99% for localized, 94% for regional and 51% for distant disease [2].

Due to the frequent tendency for recurrence (50%) and potential to metastasize (14%), amputation of the digit is often the treatment for aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma [5]. For the remaining apocrine-eccrine carcinomas, wide surgical excision is also the treatment of choice. Currently there is no uniform guideline concerning the treatment for various types of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas, especially for those with metastases. Treatment success for metastatic disease has been documented only in isolated case reports of metastasizing hidradenocarcinomas and eccrine carcinoma [6][8].

Targeted therapy may be a potential treatment option in patients whose tumors are characterized by a relevant oncogene mutation [4], [9], [10]. In a growing number of tumor types including breast, colorectal and lung cancer, selective agents that target critical cancer-promoting pathways are now the treatment of choice for those patients carrying the genetic changes recognized by the drugs [4], [9], [10]. Members of the ERBB receptor tyrosine kinase family, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2, HER3 and HER4, also present possible targeted therapeutic options [11]. ERBB2 (v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2) gene amplification and response to trastuzumab were documented in a case of metastasizing hidradenocarcinoma [7]. The membranous expression of these markers has therapeutic implications and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as HKI-272, XL647, and BIBW2992 have dual activity, inhibiting both EGFR and HER2 receptors [12], [13]. Targeting the hormone receptor pathway may also represent one potential therapeutic approach [14].

With the exception of the tumors associated with familial syndromes, studies on genetic alterations [15][19] and biomarkers such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 status [7], [17], [20] of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas are few in number. Translocation t(11;19) has been demonstrated in 2 of 11 hidradenocarcinomas [17]. In addition, hormonal studies have not been comprehensive and performed only on certain subsets of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas [7], [21][23].

We have previously reported mutations of PIK3CA and TP53 in 2 and 3 tumors, respectively, in a series of 14 metastasizing apocrine-eccrine carcinomas [16]. Only one case of aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma was included in that study. In addition, subtypes such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, malignant chondroid syringoma, malignant spiradenoma, and malignant cylindroma were not included in our previous series [16]. To investigate whether apocrine-eccrine carcinomas express hormonal receptors or possess activation of oncogenic pathways that could be targeted by available chemotherapeutic agent we performed immunohistochemistry for AR, ER, PR, EGFR, and HER2 expression; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for EGFR and ERBB2 gene amplification; and single base extension genotyping [24] for recurrent mutations in 15 cancer genes including AKT-1, EGFR, PIK3CA, and TP53 on an expanded series of 54 cases of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas (Table 1).

thumbnail

Table 1. SNaPshot® mutational assays [24].

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.t001

Materials and Methods

This study has been approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital institutional review board (IRB No. 2011-P-2489). Since the study is limited to the use of excess human material and health related information, written consent was exempted by IRB. Archival materials of all cutaneous apocrine-eccrine carcinomas including apocrine carcinoma, eccrine carcinoma, aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma, hidradenocarcinoma, malignant spiradenoma, porocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, malignant chondroid syringoma, and malignant cylindroma diagnosed between 1987 and 2011 were retrieved from the pathology files of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. In addition, the personal consultation files of MCM from 2006–2011 was searched. Age, gender, tumor site, tumor size and clinical follow-up information (such as local recurrence or metastasis) were extracted from the patients’ medical records. All patient data were de-identified. The histologic sections of all cases were re-examined and the diagnoses were confirmed.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical studies were performed on five-micrometer-thick sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, using the standard techniques involving heat-induced epitope retrieval buffer, and primary antibodies against AR (M3562, 1:50, Dako, Carpinteria, CA), ER (SP1, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), PR (1E2, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems), EGFR (3C6, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems), and HER2 (4B5, prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems). Appropriate positive and negative controls were included.

Nuclear expression of AR, ER and PR were graded as percentage of positive cells: 0% = 0, 1–10% = 1+, 11–25% = 2+, 26–50% = 3+, and 51–100% = 4+. Evaluation of membranous EGFR expression was performed using a combined scoring system based on both the staining intensity (0 = no staining, 1 = weak, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong staining) as well as the percentage of positive cells (0% = 0, <25% = 1, 26–50% = 2, 51–75% = 3, >75% = 4), similar to that outlined by Janisson-Dargaud et al [25]. The sum of these 2 scores yielded a total score from 0 to 7 (1–3 = weak, 4–7 = strong). Overexpression of HER2 was defined as positive membranous staining in more than 10% of the neoplastic cells. Partial and faint, weak or thin, and intense or thick circumferential membrane staining in more than 10% of the tumor cells were scored as 1+(negative), 2+ (equivocal), and 3+ (positive), respectively.

Mutational Analysis and EGFR and ERBB2 Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)

A SNaPshot® genotyping assay recently developed by our group was performed on 50 tumors with available archival materials [24]. This assay consists of multiplexed PCR followed by a single-base extension reaction and uses the commercially available SNaPshot platform (Applied Biosystems). The original tumor genotyping panel described by Dias-Santagata et al [24], was expanded to include three additional assays (AKT1.49, testing for the AKT1 E17K mutation; and IDH1.394 and IDH1.395, testing for hotspot mutations in IDH1, which affect codon R132). The full panel is outlined in Table 1 and tests for common mutations in 15 cancer genes. SNaPshot® genotyping was performed using previously described conditions [24], and included the following additional primers for AKT1 and IDH1 (PCR: AKT1 exon 3 Forward, 5′-ACGTTGGATGGGTAGAGTGTGCGTGGCTCT-3′; AKT1 exon 3 Reverse, 5′- ACGTTGGATGAGGTGCCATCATTCTTGAGG-3′; IDH1 exon 4 Forward, 5′-ACGTTGGATGGGCTTGTGAGTGGATGGGTA-3′, IDH1 exon 4 Reverse 5′- ACGTTGGATGGCAAAATCACATTATTGCCAAC-3′. Extension: AKT1.49 extR 5′- CTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGA​CTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGAGCCAGGTC​TTGATGTACT-3′IDH1.394 extR 5′-GACTGACTGGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGGACTGAC​TGACTGAGATCCCCATAAGCATGAC-3′, IDH1.395 extR 5′-TGATCCCCATAAGCATGA-3′).

EGFR gene copy number was assessed in 49 tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as previously published [26]. FISH failed in 3 tested cases. Gene amplification and polysomy were defined per criteria outlined by Cappuzzo et al [27]. ERBB2 gene copy number was also assessed in 6 cases with 2+ HER2 protein overexpression. Polysomy 7 was defined as three or more CEP signals per cell.

Statistical Analysis

For patients with follow-up data available, metastasis-free survival time was calculated as time from diagnosis to identification of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes or distant organs. Patients who did not develop metastases were considered censored at the time of most recent follow-up report. Log-rank tests were used to compare the distribution of metastasis-free survival between subgroups defined by positivity for mutational status (defined as non-wild type for one or more genes tested); EGFR FISH; AR, ER, PR, EGFR, and HER2 expression. Kaplan-Meier plots were created to visually assess the differences in metastasis-free survival among subgroups. The statistical association of AR expression in apocrine versus eccrine carcinoma was analyzed by Fisher's Exact Test. A two-tailed p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 54 cases were identified: apocrine carcinoma (10), eccrine carcinoma (7), aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (9), hidradenocarcinoma (10), porocarcinoma (11), adenoid cystic carcinoma (1), malignant chondroid syringoma (4), malignant spiradenoma (1), and malignant cylindroma (1).

The age of the patients ranged from 22 to 94 years (median, 62 years). The male to female ratio was 1:1. The locations of the tumors include: head and neck region (19), axilla (3), finger (9), hand (1), trunk (10), lower extremity (3), foot (3), vulva (4), and lymph node metastases (2). Six patients received radiation therapy (3 with porocarcinomas, 1 aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma, 1 eccrine carcinoma and 1 apocrine carcinoma) and one patient with aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma received 6 cycles of Carbol/taxol chemotherapy.

Follow-up was available for 38 patients (range, 0–11.4 years; median: 2.6 years). Four cases (one apocrine carcinoma, one eccrine carcinoma, and two porocarcinomas) developed recurrences. Metastases developed in 15 (39%) patients (4 with apocrine carcinoma, 6 eccrine carcinoma, 2 porocarcinomas, 2 aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinomas, and 1 hidradenocarcinoma) (Table 2). Widespread metastases developed in one patient with eccrine carcinoma that resulted in death (Table 2).

thumbnail

Table 2. Clinical data of the fifteen patients with apocrine-eccrine carcinomas and metastatic disease.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.t002

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 54 cases and the results are summarized in Table 3. Forty three percent (23/53) of cases expressed 1–4+ AR (Figures 1A and 1B). Thirty three percent (17/51) of cases expressed 1–4+ ER. Twenty percent (10/51) of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas expressed 1–4+ PR. Significant p-value (p<0.0001 via Fisher’s exact test) was noted when comparing AR-positivity in apocrine carcinoma versus eccrine carcinoma. Overexpression of EGFR was seen in 44/52 (85%) cases (Figures 2A and 2B), with 40 cases showing high and 4 cases showing low level of expression. HER overexpression (2+) was seen in 6/52 (12%) cases. Metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly by expression of AR, ER, PR, EGFR, or HER2 (p>0.05 for all comparisons).

thumbnail

Table 3. Summary of immunohistochemical analyses in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.t003
thumbnail

Figure 1. Apocrine carcinoma.

(A) Cribriform architecture, polygonal neoplastic cells and eosinophilic cytoplasm are characteristic features of apocrine carcinoma (X200). (B) Strong and diffuse nuclear staining for androgen receptor is noted (X200).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.g001
thumbnail

Figure 2. Hidradenocarcinoma.

(A) Cribriform necrosis and clear cell change are seen in a hidradenocarcinoma (X40). (B) Strong membranous expression of EGFR was noted (X200). (C) However, fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed only balanced polysomy of chromosome 7 and EGFR gene (X1000).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.g002

Mutational Analysis and FISH

The molecular results are summarized in Table 4. We have recently developed a multiplexed tumor genotyping clinical assay that uses the SNaPshot platform from Applied Biosystems [24]. This assay performs well with archived tissue and tests for recurrent mutations in 15 cancer genes, including potentially actionable targets such as BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 (Table 1). The genes included in this panel were selected based on their clinical significance and on the availability of therapeutic agents (either FDA-approved or under clinical testing) targeting these cancer pathways [24]. Due to poor quality DNA, the assay completely failed in 3 cases. In 5 cases, only a portion of the assay failed (see Appendix S1). SNaPshot genotyping identified somatic mutations in 23% (n = 11) of 47 cases (Figure 3). Activating PIK3CA mutations were detected in 1 hidradenocarcinoma (c.1624G>A; p.Glu542Lys) and 2 porocarcinomas (c.1624G>A; p.Glu542Lys and c.1633G>A; p.Glu545Lys). TP53 mutations were detected in 2 eccrine carcinomas (c.743G>A; p.Arg248Gln and c.817C>T; p.Arg273Cys), 2 hidradenocarcinomas (c.817C>T; p.Arg273Cys), 2 aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (c.818G>A; p.Arg273His and c.817C>T; p.Arg273Cys), and 1 malignant cylindroma (c.818G>A; p.Arg273His). AKT-1 (E17K) mutation was detected in one hidradenocarcinoma. Metastasis-free survival was not significantly associated with mutational status (p = 0.12, Figure 4).

thumbnail

Table 4. Summary of FISH and mutational analyses in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.t004
thumbnail

Figure 3. Mutational profiling of apocrine-eccrine carcinoma using SNaPshot® genotyping.

The top panel shows genotypic data obtained with normal male genomic DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the lower panel illustrates mutation detection in tumor DNA derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.g003
thumbnail

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier plot of metastasis-free survival time by mutational analysis results (N = 36).

The plot shows the distribution of time from diagnosis to metastasis for patients with (n = 8) and without (n = 28) one or more detected mutations, for whom follow-up information is available (N = 36). Patients who did not have metastases are censored (indicated by vertical mark) at the time of the most recent follow-up information.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.g004

FISH for EGFR gene amplification was successful in 46/50 cases. Either polysomy (Figure 2C) or trisomy was detected in 14/46 (30%) cases. Of these 14 cases, 4 (9%) exhibited high polysomy of EGFR (defined as ≥4 copies in ≥40% of cells by Capuzzzo et al [27]). Although 84% of cases overexpressed EGFR, only 30% exhibited polysomy or trisomy and no cases showed gene amplification. ERBB2 gene amplification was not detected in any of the 6 cases with 2+ HER2 protein expression. Thus, there appears to be no correlation between IHC and FISH in evaluating both EGFR and ERBB2. There was no significant difference in the distribution of metastasis-free survival time comparing patients with detected polysomy/trisomy in EGFR FISH compared to those without (p = 0.6, Figure 5).

thumbnail

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier plot of metastasis-free survival time by EGFR FISH results (N = 34).

The plot shows the distribution of time from diagnosis to metastasis for patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 22) polysomy/trisomy for EGFR, for whom follow-up information is available (N = 34). Patients who did not have metastases are censored (indicated by vertical mark) at the time of the most recent follow-up information.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.g005

Discussion

It is known that apocrine-eccrine carcinomas often express estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor [21], [23]. Due to their similar morphology and possible embryologic origin, it is not surprising that ER, PR, and AR expression can be seen in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas as observed in mammary carcinomas [21][23], [28], [29]. ER expression was seen in 10/33 (30%) apocrine-eccrine carcinomas in a series by Swanson et al [23] and the positive tumors included 8 eccrine carcinomas, 1 porocarcinoma, and 1 mucinous eccrine carcinoma. Twenty-one percent (9/42) and nineteen percent (8/42) of primary sweat gland carcinomas expressed ER and PR, respectively, in a series by Busam et al [21]. Similarly, in our series 33% (17/51) and 20% (10/51) of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas expressed ER and PR, respectively. The expression of hormonal receptors could have treatment implications since hormonal modulation plays an important role in the prevention and treatment of breast carcinomas [14]. Choudhry et al [30] reported AR expression in normal apocrine as well as eccrine glands. This suggests that androgen may modulate the function of both apocrine and eccrine glands. The expression of steroid receptors in aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinomas has not been studied. Of interest, all of the primary cutaneous apocrine carcinomas (9/9, 100%) and a third of the aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinomas express AR in more than 10% of tumor cells in our current series. By contrast, none of the eccrine tumors (0/7, 0%) in our series exhibited AR expression. This suggests that AR-positivity is strongly correlated with pure apocrine carcinoma morphology (p<0.0001). This raises the potential of anti-androgen therapy for these subsets of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas. Androgen deprivation therapy using bicalutamide has been reported to be beneficial in the treatment of metastasizing salivary duct carcinoma [31].

Strong (3+) overexpression of HER2 (3+) and gene amplification have been documented in one case of metastasizing hidradenocarcinoma [7]. These findings suggested that ERBB2 may be a relevant therapeutic target in rare cases of apocrine-eccrine carcinoma; however, we were unable to confirm this finding. None of the six apocrine-eccrine carcinomas in our series with (2+) HER2 overexpression demonstrated ERBB2 gene amplification. This is consistent with prior published results indicating that high level ERBB2 gene amplification is unlikely in the setting of 2+ HER2 overexpression [17].

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/erbB-1) belongs to a receptor family with tyrosine kinase activity whose gene is located on chromosome 7p12. The EGFR signaling that mediates proliferation, migration, invasion, and suppression of apoptosis, can be blocked by a growing number of inhibitor drugs. The role of EGFR inhibitor therapy in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas with protein overexpression remains unclear. Although the majority (85%, 44/52) of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas in our series demonstrated EGFR protein overexpression, only EGFR trisomy or polysomy (13/47, 28%) and no gene amplification were documented by FISH, most frequently noted in eccrine carcinoma, hidradenocarcinoma and porocarcinoma. This is not an unexpected finding; since similar results were noted in our recent study of hidradenocarcinomas [20]. In addition, other studies have shown that EGFR overexpression appears to be independent of EGFR mutation [32], [33]. In lung and salivary gland carcinomas, high polysomy of EGFR if considered to be FISH-positive and the patients would receive treatment [34], [35]. Further studies are warranted to determine whether similar practice may be applied for apocrine-eccrine carcinomas.

Tumor suppressor gene, TP53, located on the short arm of chromosome 17p13 has been implicated in the regulation of cell growth, DNA repair, and apoptosis. The TP53 gene is frequently (14–52%) altered in human breast carcinomas and is the most commonly mutated gene in human tumors [36][38]. TP53 mutations are usually clustered within the most conserved regions of exons 4, 5, 7, and 8 [39]. TP53 mutations have been previously described in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas (Table 5) [15][19]. Takata et al [18] performed PCR based assays for loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 3p, 5q, 9p, 9q, 13q, and 17p; yet found only 1 case with TP53 mutation by direct sequencing of exons 5 to 8. Biernat et al [15] employed single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis followed by direct DNA sequencing and found 5 of 16 sweat gland carcinomas possessed TP53 mutations (Table 5). Two of eleven hidradenocarcinomas exhibited TP53 mutations in the series by Kazakoz et al. [17] Similar to findings reported by Biernat et al [15] and Kazakov et al [17], we found TP53 mutations in codon 248 of exon 7 and codon 273 of exon 8 in our 7 positive cases (Table 5). Interestingly, these same mutations have also been reported in breast carcinomas [40][42]. Although SnaPshot testing works well for oncogenes, which are typically mutated at only a few distinct loci, it is not comprehensive for tumor suppressors. It captures only a few of the numerous mutation events described for TP53, at loci that are not covered by the assay.

thumbnail

Table 5. Summary of TP53 mutations in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas [15][19].

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.t005

PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide) mutations in these tumors have been reported by our group [16]. In breast carcinomas, the majority of mutations have been identified in the helical domain (exon 9, 37%) and in the kinase domain (exon 20, 63%) of PIK3CA [43]. All mutations were single-based substitutions [43]. Similarly we detected 2 types of mutations, c.1624G>A:p.Glu542Lys (in one hidradenocarcinoma and one porocarcinoma) and c.1633G>A:Glu545Lys (in one porocarcinoma), in exon 9 of PIK3CA. These 2 mutations are among the three most frequently reported mutations in breast cancer [43]. Mutations in codon 545 represent a mutational hotspot reported in ovarian and colorectal carcinomas as well [44], [45]. The clustering of mutations within PIK3CA may prove useful for therapeutic purposes. The phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PIK3) signaling pathway is an important regulator of cell growth, proliferation, cell motility, angiogenesis, and survival, and it has been shown that PIK3CA is the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer [46], [47]. It is thought that in breast cancer, oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA or low levels of PTEN expression may confer resistance to treatment with trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the HER2/Neu receptor [48]. ERBB2 amplification and PIK3CA mutation were validated as biomarkers for sensitivity to the single-agent phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PIK3) inhibitor, GDC-0941, in breast cancer models [49]. Other studies have shown that cancers with PIK3CA mutations were sensitive to single-agent PI3K inhibitors and dual PI3K-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors [50], [51].

AKT-1 mutation has not been previously described in cutaneous appendageal carcinomas. In carcinomas, the PI3K/AKT pathway is well characterized [46], [52]; and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway has been shown to be a target for cancer therapy including breast carcinoma [53]. While mutations in the PI3 kinase gene (PIK3CA) are common in breast carcinoma, somatic mutations in AKTs are rare [54], [55]. Similarly we found only 1 of 47 cases exhibiting AKT-1 mutation.

The presence of either high polysomy, low polysomy or trisomy of EGFR does not appear to correlate with metastatic disease (p = 0.6, Figure 5). Five of the 8 cases (63%) with detected mutations had metastatic disease, while 9 of the 28 cases (32%) with no mutations detected developed metastases; however, there was no significant difference in metastasis-free survival (p = 0.12, Figure 4). Thus, there appears to be no correlation between the presence of mutations and metastatic disease. Apocrine-eccrine carcinomas and breast carcinomas are analogous tumors often with similar histology. It is interesting that in this study we detected mutations in PIK3CA and TP53 in a subset of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas, a therapeutically-relevant finding since both of these genes are known to be frequently mutated in breast carcinomas.

Currently there is no uniform guideline concerning the treatment for metastatic apocrine-eccrine carcinomas and treatment success has been documented only in isolated case reports [6][8]. A variety of chemotherapeutic agents have been used with varying degrees of responsiveness. Combinations of cyclophosphamide, bleomycin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; interferon-alpha, interleukin-2, sunitinib, and tamoxifen have been reported with some degree of response [6], [8], [56], [57]. Remission was achieved for 16 months with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a case of apocrine carcinoma with lymph node, lung, and bone metastasis [58]. Hikada et al [59] reported a case of metastatic apocrine carcinoma responded to treatment with HER-2 inhibitors. Radiation therapy has been used in selected cases of metastatic porocarcinoma [60].

In this study we used a SNaPshot platform, previously reported by our group [24], to screen relevant cancer genes with available targeted therapeutic agents in rare tumors. The platform is cost effective due to two main reasons. First, SNaPshot testing uses thermocyclers (PCR machines) and capillary electrophoresis DNA sequencers, which are instruments that already exist in any typical clinical molecular laboratory. Thus, there is not need for an upfront investment in expensive equipment or bioinformatics personnel. Secondly, because SNaPshot tests for hotspot mutations in a multiplexed fashion, it only uses a fraction of tumor tissue required for probing the same number of exons using Sanger sequencing.

In summary, we report mutations in AKT-1, PIK3CA and TP53 in a subset of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas including eccrine carcinoma, aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma, hidradenocarcinoma, and porocarcinoma. There is strong correlation of AR expression in the apocrine carcinoma subtype, raising the potential for anti-androgen therapy. The role of EGFR inhibitor therapy in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas with protein overexpression remains unclear. The lack of correlation between the protein expression and polysomy/gene amplification suggests that molecular mechanisms other than gene amplification may play a role in EGFR overexpression in adnexal carcinomas. Based on our findings, targeted therapy including PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors, which is currently in clinical testing, may be potential treatment options for rare cases of apocrine-eccrine carcinomas. It will be interesting to determine whether these results will translate into real therapeutic response in followup clinical trial studies.

Supporting Information

Appendix S1.

Appendix of failed cases.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.s001

(DOC)

Table S1.

Detailed immunohistochemical scorings in apocrine-eccrine carcinomas.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047290.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of cases from the following pathologists: Hamsa Al-Dulaimi, M.D., Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, NJ; F. Fereidooni, M.D., Shahriar General Hospital, Tehran, Iran; Mark Grathwohl, M.D., Northwestern Westchester Hospital, Mount Kisco, NY; Alvin Hall, M.D., Lab Corp Histology/Pathology, Raritan, NJ; Nancy Joste, M.D., University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albeuquerque, NM; Muzaffar Khan, M.D., St. Elizabeth Hospital Laboratory, Utica, NY; Martin H Matthews, M.D., Marquette General Health System, Marquette, MI; Anne Moran, M.D., Merrimack Valley Hospital, Haverhill, MA; Mary T. Parisi, M.D., Dianon Systems, West Palm Beach, FL; William Smothermon, M.D., Cedars Medical Center, Miami, FL; Joel Umlas, M.D., Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA; Jennifer J. Wilken, M.D., Orange County Regional Medical Center, Middletown, NY; Sandro Casavilca Zambrano, M.D., Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru.

We thank Guilin Wang and Caitlin Ann Routhier, MGH Immunohistochemistry Laboratory; and Julie Miller and Hector Lopez, MGH Molecular Cancer Center, for their technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LPL DDS MPH. Performed the experiments: LPL DDS ACP AKC ATN MPH. Analyzed the data: LPL DDS ACP AKC ATN MAS AD NH AJI MCM MPH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAS AD MCM MPH. Wrote the paper: LPL MPH.

References

  1. 1. LeBoit PE, Burg G, Weedon D, Sarsin A (eds) (2006) World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology & Genetics: Skin Tumors. Lyon, France: IARC Press.
  2. 2. Blake PW, Bradford PT, Devesa SS, Toro JR (2010) Cutaneous appendageal carcinoma incidence and survival patterns in the United States: A population-based study. Arch Dermatol 146: 625–632. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.105
  3. 3. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, Kim B, Seed PT, et al. (2001) Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 25: 710–720. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200106000-00002
  4. 4. Wong TY, Suster S, Nogita T, Duncan LM, Dickersin RG, et al. (1994) Clear cell eccrine carcinomas of the skin: a clinicopathologic study of nine patients. Cancer 73: 1631–43. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940315)73:6<1631::aid-cncr2820730615>3.0.co;2-7
  5. 5. Duke WH, Sherrod TT, Lupton GP (2000) Aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (aggressive digital papillary adenoma and adenocarcinoma revisited). Am J Surg Pathol 24: 775–784. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200006000-00002
  6. 6. Battistella M, Mateus C, Lassau N, Chami L, Boukoucha M, et al. (2010) Sunitinib efficacy in the treatment of metastatic skin adnexal carcinomas: report of two patients with hidradenocarcinoma and trichoblastic carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24: 199–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03301.x
  7. 7. Nash JW, Barrett TL, Kies M, Ross MI, Sneige N, et al. (2007) Metastatic hidradenocarcinoma with demonstration of Her-2/neu gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization: potential treatment implications. J Cutan Pathol 34: 49–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2006.00570.x
  8. 8. Schroder U, Dries V, Klussmann JP, Wittekindt C, Eckel HE (2004) Successful adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for estrogen receptor-positive metastasizing sweat gland adenocarcinoma: need for a clinical trial? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113: 242–4.
  9. 9. Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, Robert NJ, Scholl S, et al. (1999) Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol 17: 2639–48.
  10. 10. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, et al. (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 337–45. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa033025
  11. 11. Wang SE, Narasanna A, Perez-Torres M, Xiang B, Wu FY, et al. (2006) HER2 kinase domain mutation results in constitutive phosphorylation and activation of HER2 and EGFR and resistance to EGFR tyrosinase kinase inhibitors. Cancer Cell 10: 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.023
  12. 12. Li D, Ambrogo L, Shimamura T, Kubo S, Takahashi M, et al. (2008) BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene 27: 4702–11. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.109
  13. 13. Riely GJ (2008) Second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosinase kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol (Suppl 2): S146–S149.
  14. 14. Adelson K, Germain D, Raptis G, Biran N (2011) Hormonal modulation in the treatment of breast cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40: 519–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2011.05.011
  15. 15. Biernat W, Peraud A, Wozniak L, Ohqaki H (1998) p53 mutations in sweat gland carcinomas. Int J Cancer 76: 317–20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980504)76:3<317::aid-ijc5>3.3.co;2-u
  16. 16. Dias-Santagata D, Lam Q, Bergethon K, Baker GM, Iafrate AJ, et al. (2011) A potential role for targeted therapy in a subset of metastasizing adnexal carcinomas. Mod Pathol 24: 974–982. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.48
  17. 17. Kazakov DV, Ivan D, Kutzner H, Spagnolo DV, Grossmann P, et al. (2009) Cutaneous hidradenocarcinoma: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biologic study of 14 cases, including Her2/neu gene expression/amplification, TP53 gene mutation analysis, and t (11;19) translocation. Am J Dermatopathol 31: 236–47. doi: 10.1097/dad.0b013e3181984f10
  18. 18. Takata M, Hashimoto K, Mehregan P, Lee MVV, Yamamoto A, et al. (2000) Genetic changes in sweat gland carcinomas. J Cutan Pathol 27: 30–5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2000.027001030.x
  19. 19. Takata M, Rehman I, Rees JL (1998) A trichilemmal carcinoma arising from a proliferating trichilemmal cyst: the loss of the wild-type p53 is a critical event in malignant transformation. Hum Pathol 29: 193–5.
  20. 20. Piris A, Scopsi L, Clemente C, Cetti Serbelloni F, Mihm MC Jr, et al. (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene status by fluorescent in situ hybridization in malignant, atypical, and benign hidradenomas. Am J Dermatopathol 32: 586–92. doi: 10.1097/dad.0b013e3181cd64f2
  21. 21. Busam KJ, Tan LK, Granter SR, Kohler S, Junkins-Hopkins J, et al. (1999) Epidermal growth factor, estrogen, and progesterone receptor expression in primary sweat gland carcinomas and primary and metastatic mammary carcinomas. Mod Pathol 12: 786–93.
  22. 22. Robson A, Lazar AJ, Ben Nagi J, Hanby A, Grayson W, et al. (2008) Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 32: 682–690. doi: 10.1097/pas.0b013e3181590ba4
  23. 23. Swanson PE, Mazoujian G, Mills SE, Campbell RJ, Wick MR (1991) Immunoreactivity for estrogen receptor protein in sweat gland tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 15: 835–41. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199109000-00003
  24. 24. Dias-Santagata D, Akhavanfard S, David SS, Vernovsky K, Kuhlmann G, et al. (2010) Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumors: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine. EMBO Mol Med 2: 146–58. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201000070
  25. 25. Janisson-Dargaud D, Durlach A, Lorenzato M, Grange F, Bernard P, et al. (2008) Aneuploidy, but not Ki-67 or EGFR expression, is associated with recurrences in basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 35: 916–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00935.x
  26. 26. Growdon WB, Boisvert SL, Akhavanfard S, Oliva E, Dias-Santagata DC, et al. (2008) Decreased survival in EGFR gene amplified vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 111: 289–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.038
  27. 27. Cappuzzo F, Hirsch FR, Rossi E, Bartolini S, Ceresoli GL, et al. (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 643–655. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji112
  28. 28. Gatalica Z (1997) Immunohistochemical analysis of apocrine breast lesions. Consistent over-expression of androgen receptor accompanied by the loss of estrogen and progresterone receptors in apocrine metaplasia and apocrine carcinoma in situ. Pathol Res Pract 193: 753–758.
  29. 29. Tavassoli FA, Purcell CA, Bratthauer GL, Man Y (1996) Androgen receptor expression along with loss of bcl-2, ER, and PR expression in benign and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast: implications for therapy. Breast J 2: 261–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.1996.tb00107.x
  30. 30. Choudhry R, Hodgins MB, Van der Kwast TH, Brinkmann AO, Boersma WJ (1992) Localization of androgen receptors in human skin by immunohistochemistry: implications for the hormonal regulation of hair growth, sebaceous glands and sweat glands. J Endocrinol 133: 467–475. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1330467
  31. 31. Jaspers HCJ, Verbist BM, Schoffelen R, Mattijssen V, Slootweg PJ, et al. (2011) Androgen receptor-positive salivary duct carcinoma: a disease entity with promising new treatment options. J Clin Oncol 29: e473–6. doi: 10.1200/jco.2010.32.8351
  32. 32. Li AR, Chitale D, Riely GJ, Pao W, Miller VA, et al. (2008) EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: clinical testing experience and relationship to EGFR gene copy number and immunohistochemical expression. J Mol Diagn 10: 242–248.
  33. 33. Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME (2001) EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer (Suppl 4): 9–15.
  34. 34. Ettl T, Stiegler C, Zeitler K, Muller M, Agaimy A, et al.. (2011) EGFR, HER2, survivin, and loss of pSTAT3 characterize high-grade malignancy in salivary gland cancer with impact on prognosis. Hum Pathol in press.
  35. 35. Lee Y, Shim HS, Park MS, Kim JH, Ha SJ, et al. (2012) High EGFR gene copy number and skin rash as predictive markers for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1760–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2582
  36. 36. Berns EM, Klijn JG, Smid M, van Staveren IL, Look MP, et al. (1996) TP53 and myc gene alterations independently predict poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 16: 170–9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199607)16:3<170::aid-gcc3>3.3.co;2-b
  37. 37. Elledge RM, Allred DC (1994) The P53 tumor suppressor genes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 32: 39–47. doi: 10.1007/bf00666204
  38. 38. Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstain B, Harris CC (1991) p53 mutations in human cancer. Science 253: 49–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1905840
  39. 39. Levine AJ (1997) p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88: 323–31. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1
  40. 40. Lo Nigro C, Vivenza D, Monteverde M, Lattanzio L, Gojis O, et al. (2012) High frequency of complex TP53 mutations in CNS metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 106: 397–404.
  41. 41. Rapakko K, Allinen M, Syrjakoski K, Vahteristo P, Huusko P, et al. (2001) Germline TP53 alterations in Finish breast cancer families are rare and occur at conserved mutation-prone sites. Br J Cancer 84: 116–9.
  42. 42. Ruijs MWG, Verhoef S, Rookus MA, Pruntel R, van der Hout AH, et al. (2010) TP53 germline mutation testing in 180 families suspected of Li-Fraumeni syndrome: mutation detection rate and relative frequency of cancers in different familial phenotypes. J Med Genet. 47: 421–8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073429
  43. 43. Michelucci A, Cristofano CD, Lami A, Collecchi P, Caligo A, et al. (2009) PIK3CA in breast carcinoma: a mutational analysis of sporadic and hereditary cases. Diagn Mol Pathol 18: 200–5. doi: 10.1097/pdm.0b013e31818e5fa4
  44. 44. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304: 554. doi: 10.1126/science.1096502
  45. 45. Wang Y, Helland A, Holm R, Kristensen GB, Borresen-Dale AL (2005) PIK3CA mutations in advanced ovarian carcinomas. Human Mutation #787 online.
  46. 46. Bachman KE, Argani P, Samuels Y, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol Ther 3: 772–5. doi: 10.4161/cbt.3.8.994
  47. 47. Samuels Y, Ericson K (2006) Oncogenic PI3K and its role in cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 18: 77–82. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000198021.99347.b9
  48. 48. Chin L, Gray JW (2008) Translating insights from the cancer genome into clinical practice. Nature 452: 553–63. doi: 10.1038/nature06914
  49. 49. Turke AB, Engelman JA (2010) PIKing the right patient. Clin Cancer Res 169: 3523–5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1201
  50. 50. Ihle NT, Lemos R Jr, Wipf P, Yacoub A, Mitchell C, et al. (2009) Mutations in the phophatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway predict for antitumor activity of the inhibitor PX-866 whereas oncogenic Ras is a dominant predictor for resistance. Cancer Res 69: 143–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6656
  51. 51. Serra V, Markman B, Scaltriti M, Eichhorn PJ, Valero V, et al. (2008) NVP-BEZ235, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, prevents PI3K signaling and inhibits the growth of cancer cells with activating PI3K mutations. Cancer Res 68: 8022–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1385
  52. 52. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL (2002) The phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 489–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc839
  53. 53. Morgensztern D, McLeod HL (2005) PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway as a target for cancer therapy. Anticancer Drugs 16: 797–803. doi: 10.1097/01.cad.0000173476.67239.3b
  54. 54. Soung YH, Lee JW, Nam SW, Lee JY, Yoo NJ, et al. (2006) Mutational analysis of AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 genes in common human carcinomas. Oncology 70: 285–289. doi: 10.1159/000096289
  55. 55. Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, et al. (2008) An intergrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res 68: 6084–6091. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6854
  56. 56. de Giorgi V, Sestini S, Massi D, Papi F, Lotti T (2007) Eccrine porocarcinoma: a rare but sometimes fatal malignant neoplasm. Dermatol Surg 33: 371–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33077.x
  57. 57. Gutermuth J, Audring H, Voit C, Trefzer U, Haas N (2004) Antitumor activity of paclitaxel and interferon-alpha in a case of metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18: 477–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00949.x
  58. 58. Tlemcani K, Levine D, Smith RV, Brandwein-Gensler M, Staffenberg DA, et al. (2010) Metastatic apocrine carcinoma of the scalp: prolonged response to systemic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28: e412–4. doi: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.1891
  59. 59. Zeidan YH, Zauls AJ, Belic M, Lentsch EJ, Sharma AK (2010) Treatment of eccrine porocarcinoma with metastasis to the parotid gland using intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a case report. J Med Case Reports 4: 147. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-4-147
  60. 60. Hidaka T, Fujimura T, Watabe A, Hashimoto A, Haga T, et al.. (2012) Successful treatment of HER-2-positive metastatic apocrine carcinoma of the skin with Lapatinib and Capecitabine. Acta Derm Venereol In press.