Advertisement
Research Article

DNA Polymerase α (swi7) and the Flap Endonuclease Fen1 (rad2) Act Together in the S-Phase Alkylation Damage Response in S. pombe

  • Milana Koulintchenko,

    Affiliation: Division of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    X
  • Sonya Vengrova,

    Affiliation: Division of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    X
  • Trevor Eydmann,

    Affiliation: Division of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    X
  • Prakash Arumugam,

    Affiliation: School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    X
  • Jacob Z. Dalgaard mail

    j.z.dalgaard@warwick.ac.uk

    Affiliation: Division of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

    X
  • Published: October 11, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047091

Abstract

Polymerase α is an essential enzyme mainly mediating Okazaki fragment synthesis during lagging strand replication. A specific point mutation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe polymerase α named swi7-1, abolishes imprinting required for mating-type switching. Here we investigate whether this mutation confers any genome-wide defects. We show that the swi7-1 mutation renders cells hypersensitive to the DNA damaging agents methyl methansulfonate (MMS), hydroxyurea (HU) and UV and incapacitates activation of the intra-S checkpoint in response to DNA damage. In addition we show that, in the swi7-1 background, cells are characterized by an elevated level of repair foci and recombination, indicative of increased genetic instability. Furthermore, we detect novel Swi1-, -Swi3- and Pol α- dependent alkylation damage repair intermediates with mobility on 2D-gel that suggests presence of single-stranded regions. Genetic interaction studies showed that the flap endonuclease Fen1 works in the same pathway as Pol α in terms of alkylation damage response. Fen1 was also required for formation of alkylation- damage specific repair intermediates. We propose a model to explain how Pol α, Swi1, Swi3 and Fen1 might act together to detect and repair alkylation damage during S-phase.

Introduction

DNA polymerase alpha (Pol α) is an essential replicative DNA polymerase, which is conserved amongst all eukaryotes. The Pol α holoenzyme consists of four subunits: a catalytic subunit, a regulatory beta-subunit and two primase subunits. The primase entity of DNA Pol α synthesises a ~10 nucleotide long RNA primer at the origins of replication and at the start of each Okazaki fragment during lagging strand synthesis. This RNA primer is extended, with low fidelity, by the catalytic subunit of Pol α holoenzyme by 30–40 nucleotides, and the synthesis is completed by a highly processive and high-fidelity DNA polymerases δ or ε. During maturation of Okazaki fragments, the part of each fragment, synthesized by Pol α, is displaced by processive DNA synthesis and removed by the flap endonuclease Fen1 and the DNA helicase and endonuclease Dna2.

The catalytic subunit of Pol α contains 6 conserved domains (designated I to VI in the order of the most conserved to least conserved), the first (I) of which is important for interaction with metal ions, Mg2+ and Mn2+, and the second (II) – for dNTP binding [1]. While regions I, II and III are present in all eukaryotic and prokaryotic polymerases, the region V is present only in all eukaryotic polymerases, except those encoded by maize S1 and yeast pGKL1 plasmids [1]. Interestingly, a single amino acid substitution G372E in Pol α catalytic subunit in Schizosaccharomyces pombe affects imprinting at the mating-type locus without abolishing its essential catalytic activity [2].

The fission yeast exhibits two opposite mating types “+” and “−”. Cells can switch their mating-types by reprogramming their genomic DNA (reviewed by [3]). The mating-type of S. pombe is determined by the mat1 locus located on chromosome II. Mating-type switching occurs when the DNA of the actively expressed cassette at mat1 is replaced with a cassette that contains the opposite mating-type gene sequence [4]. The gene conversion event resulting in switching of mating type is initiated by an imprint at the mat1 locus that is formed during S-phase of the cell cycle [5], [6]. The imprint has been characterized as two ribonucleotides, incorporated into the DNA duplex at a specific position, and it is formed in the strand, which is synthesized as lagging during replication of mat1 [7], [8]. Formation of the imprint depends on pausing of the replication fork at the mat1 pause site 1 (MPS1) mediated by Swi1 and Swi3 [9]. The swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 mutants were identified together in a screen for the factors affecting mating-type switching [10]. In swi1 and swi3 mutants, both replication pausing and imprinting at mat1 are abolished, while the swi7-1 mutation only affects imprinting. Thus, Swi7/Pol α acts downstream of Swi1 and Swi3 in the imprinting pathway [9]. Swi1 and Swi3 were subsequently shown to have genome-wide functions. They were characterized as parts of a Replication Fork Progression complex [11], [12]. These factors travel with the replication fork and are involved in response to alkylation damage and intra S-phase checkpoint signalling [11], [12], [13]. In addition to their function at the mat1 pause site MPS1, Swi1 and Swi3 were also shown to act at replication termination site RTS1 and at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) barriers [9], [14].

Here we investigated whether the swi7-1 mutation confers any genome wide effects outside the mating-type region. We show that the swi7-1 mutation causes general genetic instability and hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents, in particular to alkylation damage. Specifically we observe Swi1-, Swi3-, Pol α and Fen1 dependent alkylation damage repair intermediates. Furthermore, we show that Fen1 and Pol α act in the same pathway with regards to alkylation damage repair. We propose how Swi1, Swi3, Pol α and Fen1 could act together in DNA repair at replication forks stalled at damaged bases.

Results

Swi7 mutation increases sensitivity to DNA damaging agents

To investigate the role of Pol α in the DNA damage response, we measured the sensitivity of swi7 mutant cells to MMS, HU and UV. The alkylating agent MMS leads to formation of three types of DNA damage depending on the nature of CH3 attachment at the bases [15]. In 80–90% of cases, MMS treatment results in alkylation of purines (N7-guanine and N3-adenine), which are repaired by base excision repair (BER; [16]). The N7-adenine and N3-guanine make up to 1% of the damage and the O6-guanine (MeG) up to 0.3%. MeG is the most potent damage induced by MMS, as this modification cannot be repaired by BER but has to be removed directly. Alkylation damage has been shown to slow S-phase progression by FACS analysis [13], [17]. Some alkylation-damaged bases including 3-methyladenine and 3-metylguanine act as barriers for DNA replication [18], [19].

Test of survival following chronic exposure to MMS was performed using the drop-assay approach. Results indicated that the swi7-1 mutant was hypersensitive to MMS compared to wild type strain (Figure 1A). Its sensitivity was similar to that of swi1, swi3 and cds1 mutant strains (cell lethality was observed at 0.005–0.0075% MMS) but not as high as that of chk1 and rad3 mutant cells [13]. Test of survival after limited exposure to MMS also indicated that the swi7-1 mutant was hypersensitive to alkylation damage (Figure 1B). This hypersensitivity was comparable to that of the swi1 mutant strain but slightly more than the swi3 mutant strain.

thumbnail

Figure 1. S. pombe swi7-1 mutant is sensitive to DNA damaging agents.

A. Drop-assay analysis. Drops containing approximately 100 cells from mutant and wild type strains were placed on medium, containing methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or hydrohyurea (HU) at concentrations given, or were exposed to UV at the given intensities. The plates were incubated at 33° until colonies were formed. B. Survival of yeast cells exposed to MMS or HU. Logarithmically growing cultures were treated with either 0.03% MMS or 12 mM of HU. Samples were taken at indicated time points, and dilution series of cells for each culture were plated on YEA media and incubated at 33°C until colonies were formed. Strains shown in panel A and B are wt (JZ60), swi7-1 (JZ468), chk1 (JZ473), rad3 (JZ474), cds1 (JZ475), swi1 (E111), swi3 (E146).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g001

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a DNA replication inhibitor that represses both the elongation and initiation phases of replication and triggers the intra-S phase checkpoint. Hydroxyurea affects DNA synthesis by reversibly inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), preventing the reduction of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides (deoxynucleoside triphosphates [dNTPs] thereby depleting the dNTP pool at replication forks [20]. HU slows down or inhibits S-phase progression and can compromise genetic integrity by increasing the rate of recombination. The swi7-1 mutant cells were hypersensitive to HU (4 mM) (Figure 1A). The HU sensitivity of swi7-1 cells was comparable to that of checkpoint mutants cds1 and chk1, but slightly elevated compared to swi1 and swi3 mutants. However in the short-term survival test (Figure 1B) there was no difference between wild type and swi7-1 sensitivities to HU. This suggests that swi7-1 mutant cells lose viability after prolonged exposure to HU (more than 5–6 hours).

The principal forms for DNA damage induced by UVB and UVA are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6,4-pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts, while UVC mostly forms dipyrimidines that contain 5-methylcytosine [21]. These photoproducts are mutagenic and block DNA replication by the replicative DNA polymerases [22]. The swi7-1 mutant cells were only mildly sensitive to UV irradiation (Figure 1A). Cell growth began to decline slightly only when yeast cells were subjected to a 150 J/m2 dose of UV. These results indicate that the swi7-1 mutation affects the ability of Pol α to respond to alkylation and HU–induced DNA damage.

swi7 mutation affects the intra-S phase checkpoint

DNA damage activates checkpoint mechanisms, which prevent entry into mitosis until DNA is repaired. However if the intra-S checkpoint is defective then cells will enter mitosis despite the presence of damaged DNA resulting in mitotic chromosome segregation defects and cell death. Typically such cells will manifest a “cut” (for “cell untimely torn”) phenotype which consists of a septated cell with abnormally segregated DNA easily detected by DAPI staining [23]. Wild-type and swi7-1 mutant cells were grown to log phase and stained with DAPI for visualization of nuclei. The swi7-1 showed significantly increased amount of cells with the ‘cut phenotype’ even in the absence of MMS treatment (Figure 2A and B) and this was further increased by prolonged (2.5 and 5 hours) treatment with 0.01% and 0.03% MMS. Also, more swi7-1 cells with abnormal nuclei were observed when cell were exposed to 0.01% MMS, but not when exposed to 0.03% MMS.

thumbnail

Figure 2. swi7-1 mutant might have a role in S-phase but not in mitotic checkpoint.

A. Images of the wt (JZ60), swi1 (E111), swi7-1 (JZ468) and cds1 (JZ475) cells stained with DAPI and Calcofluor were taken at 2.5 h and 5 h time point for both the untreated and MMS treated cultures. Gray arrows indicate cells with the cut phenotype. Five hundred or more cells were analyzed for each strain. B. Quantification of the percentage of cells displaying the “cut” phenotype and abnormal nuclei for the indicated strains, for both treated and untreated cultures. C. The swi7-1 mutant shows defect in S-phase progression in response to MMS damage. Asynchronous cultures of wt (JZ60), cds1 (JZ475), swi1 (E111) and swi7-1 (JZ468) strains were incubated in absence or presence of 0.01% or 0.03% MMS. Cell samples were taken for flow cytometry analysis at indicated time points. D. Mitosis index of wt, cds1, swi1 and swi7-1 cells. Changes in the percentage of binucleated and septated cells were determined as a function of time without and after the addition of 0.01% or 0.03% MMS.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g002

Since we detected a high level of cells with the “cut” phenotype for both MMS exposed and unexposed swi7-1 cells, we investigated whether the swi7-1 mutant cells had any checkpoint defects. First, we examined the effect of swi7-1 on the intra-S phase checkpoint response. Activation of the intra-S phase checkpoint can be determined by exposing logarithmically growing cultures to MMS and analysing the DNA content of the cells by flow cytometry [17], [24]. In fission yeast, during exponential growth, G2 phase occupies approximately 70% of the cell cycle. When DNA synthesis is arrested due to activation of the intra-S phase checkpoint, there will be two populations with 1C (cells arrested in S) and 2C DNA content (cells arrested in G2). While wild type cells demonstrated a slowing down of replication under alkylation stress, and the appearance of two peaks in the FACS profile, the swi7-1 mutant cells did not (Figure 2C). The same effect was observed in swi1 mutant cells and to a greater extent in the cds1 mutant, which are known to be defective in the intra-S phase checkpoint. This shows that Pol α is required for intra-S phase checkpoint activation following DNA damage.

We then investigated whether the swi7-1 mutation affected the mitotic checkpoint. Since formation of a septum is dependent on prior mitosis, we measured the percentage of cells with two nuclei (binucleated cells) and with a septum as an indication of passage through mitosis. Nuclei and septation can be visualized in fixed cells by staining with DAPI (DNA binding dye), and Calcofluor (septum dye), followed by UV illumination. DAPI and Calcofluor staining of cells prepared from asynchronous wild type, cds1, swi1 and swi7-1 strains cultures, treated by MMS, revealed that in all tested strains, the proportion of binucleated and septated cells was significantly reduced within 2–3 h of exposure to 0.01 and 0.03% MMS (Figure 2D), indicating that both swi7-1 and swi1 strains displayed normal mitotic arrest. The fact there is an intact G2-M checkpoint response in the swi7-1 strain is not in conflict with the observation of a cut phenotype. Indeed similar observations have been made in sap1 mutant cells where the presence of damaged DNA that cannot be fully repaired affects faithful chromosome segregation resulting in the appearance of the “cut” phenotype (Figure 2A; [25]). Thus, the swi7 cells arrest in mitosis in response to DNA damage, but might show the “cut” phenotype due to accumulation of DNA damage.

Detection of alkylation damage repair intermediates in S. pombe

To determine the role of Swi1, Swi3 and Pol α in the alkylation damage response, we established an assay for detecting alkylation damage-specific repair intermediates in wild type cells. In S. cerevisiae alkylation repair intermediates have been detected using 2D-gel electrophoresis of replication intermediates isolated from MMS-treated cells [26], [27], [28], [29]. Since the migration pattern of these intermediates closely matched that of Holliday junctions formed by recombination they were suggested to be sister chromatid junctions formed behind the replication fork, due to the presence of single stranded regions created during replication of damaged template DNA. To detect alkylation specific intermediates in S. pombe we used genomic DNA digested either with HindIII/KpnI or with BamHI restriction enzymes, for the analysis of the fragment corresponding to rDNA repeat region, ars3001. We prepared two probes for this region, one of which covers the replication origin (the HindIII/KpnI fragment), and another that covers the replication termination barrier (the BamHI fragment). We determined the 2D-gel patterns at the ars3001 locus in the presence and absence of MMS. We varied the length of drug exposure (Figure 3A) and drug concentrations (Figure 3C). At the ars3001 replication origin, the profile of replication intermediates changed after 10 minutes following exposure to MMS (Figure 3A & B). A similar change was also observed at the terminator region albeit only after 30–60 minutes of incubation with MMS. At the replication origin region, the bubble-arc (typical for fragments containing the replication origin) was present in untreated cells but disappeared in MMS-treated cells. Interestingly at both the replication origin and the barrier regions a band appeared below the Y-arc only in the presence of MMS, suggesting the presence of an alkylation damage repair intermediate (Figure 3D). The amount of these intermediates increased with time (Figure 3A and B). Likewise, increasing the dose of MMS from 0.01% to 0.03% also lead to an increase in signal intensity, while no further increase was observed at 0.06% MMS (Figure 3C). We also observed a slight increase in the intensity of the spike signal constituted by Holliday junction intermediates, similar to what was observed for S. cerevisiae cells treated with MMS [26], [27], [28], [29] (Figure 3B).

thumbnail

Figure 3. Analysis of replication/repair intermediates purified from wild type MMS treated cultures.

A. 2D-gel analysis of replication/repair intermediates from wild type cells (JZ60) during a time course of incubation with 0.03% MMS. Times of MMS incubation are given below the panels. Two different restriction fragments from the rDNA region were analysed. The position of restriction sites and genetic elements of the rDNA region is outlined in the line drawing above the panels. B. Quantification of the ratio (%) of the intensity of repair intermediates and spike intermediates versus the intensity of the Y-arc for the panels shown in A. C. 2D-gel analysis of replication/repair intermediates from wild type cells (JZ60) treated for 1 h with increasing amount of MMS. D. Interpretation of replication/repair intermediates profiles from untreated or MMS-treated wild type cell cultures.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g003

swi1, swi3 and swi7 mutations abolish the formation of alkylation damage repair intermediates

To determine whether Pol α, Swi3 and Swi1 are required for formation of alkylation damage repair intermediates, we performed 2D-gel analysis of the rDNA region from MMS-treated swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 mutant cells. While we detected the alkylation damage repair intermediates in wild-type cells after 0.5 and 2 h of MMS treatment, they were notably absent in swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 mutant cells. This was true for both the replication origin and termination barrier regions (Figure 4). Thus, Pol α, Swi3 and Swi1 are required for formation of alkylation damage repair intermediates.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Analysis of replication/repair intermediates purified from wild type, swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 mutant yeast cells treated by MMS.

2D-gel analysis of replication/repair intermediates from wild type (JZ60), swi1 (E111), swi3 (E146) and swi7-1 (JZ468) cells treated with MMS. The yeast genomic DNA was purified from cell cultures incubated without or in presence of 0.03% MMS for 0.5 and 2 h. The repair intermediates in the wild type panel are indicated with the gray arrows.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g004

Replication coupled repair intermediates produced during alkylation damage are not generated by HU treatment

We then tested whether the intermediates generated by MMS treatment were also generated by HU treatment. Earlier studies have shown that there is an increased instability of replication forks following HU treatment in swi1 and swi3 mutant strains [11], [12]. Importantly, 2D-gel analysis of replication intermediates for mutant cells suggested that the instability was due to single stranded regions forming behind the replication fork [11], [12]. We also wanted to test whether similar genetic instability could be observed for the swi7-1 strain when cells were exposed to HU. Using 2D-gel analysis, we tested the replication intermediates purified from wild type and swi7-1 mutant cell cultures, treated with HU for 2.5 and 5 h (Figure 5A). In replication/recombination intermediate profiles of wild type cells, obtained at the origin and barrier regions, we did not detect the intermediates that appear after MMS treatment. We observed that after HU treatment the ratios of bubble arc versus Y-arc increased for the wild-type stain (Figure 5A and B). Such an accumulation of bubble intermediates was previously observed [11]. At the same time in swi7 mutant cells, the bubble arc was barely visible in the DNA sample from untreated cells and undetectable in HU-treated cells. This shows that the swi7-1 mutation reduces the accumulation of bubble intermediates at ARS3001. Interestingly, a significant increase of the signal that corresponds to Holliday junction (HJ) intermediates was detected in swi7-1 but not in wild type cells. This increase can be observed in untreated cells, and with a slightly increased intensity in HU treated cells (Figure 5A and B). Finally, we did not observe any signals below the Y-arc, as previously observed for swi1 and swi3 mutant cells exposed to HU, suggesting that no single stranded regions are forming behind the progressing replication fork [11], [12], [13]. Our data suggest that the swi7-1 mutation causes genetic instability during DNA replication albeit different from that observed in swi1 and swi3 mutant strains.

thumbnail

Figure 5. Analysis of replication/recombination intermediates purified from hydroxyurea treated wild type and swi7-1 mutant yeast cells.

A. 2D-gel analysis of replication/recombination intermediates from wild type cells (JZ60) and swi7 (JZ468) during a time course of incubation with 12 mM HU. Times of HU incubation are given to the left of the panels. Two different restriction fragments from the rDNA region were analysed. The position of restriction sites and genetic elements of the rDNA region is outlined in the line drawing above the panels. B. Calculation in ratios (%) of bubble arcs (replication intermediates) and spikes (recombination intermediates) versus Y-arc intermediates.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g005

The swi7-1 mutation causes genetic instability

To directly address whether the swi7 mutation caused genetic instability as suggested by the increased presence of HJ-intermediates we used two approaches. To visualize DNA damage in living cells, we utilized cells that express Rad22-YFP from its endogenous promoter at its genomic locus. Rad22 is a homologue of budding yeast Rad52 [30] and was shown to bind to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) during homologous recombination, leading to formation of Rad22-YFP DNA repair foci [31]. In comparison to wild type cells, we detected a highly elevated level of Rad22-YFP DNA repair foci in swi7-1 cells (Figure 6A & B). The proportion of swi7 cells with repair foci appears in G2, reaches its peak in M/G1 phase of the cell cycle and is maintained at significantly high levels throughout G1 and S phases. This observation indicates that the swi7-1 mutant cells accumulate DNA damage after replication that is repaired mainly in the M/G1 phase of the cell cycle.

thumbnail

Figure 6. swi7-1 mutation causes genetic instability.

A. Quantification of Rad22-YFP foci in swi7-1 mutant and wild-type cells. Wild type (ENY670) and swi7 (MK140) mutant cells expressing Rad22-YFP were grown at room temperature until the mid-log phase. A small aliquot of cell culture was used for analysis by microscopy. About six hundred cells were analysed for each strain. B. Line drawing displaying the different cell morphologies through the cell cycle in fission yeast. C. Assay for quantification of recombination frequencies. Schematic drawing of the intrachromosomal recombination substrate and of the possible outcomes of recombination events. The red circles indicate the approximate positions of the mutations. D. Quantification of the recombination rate in wild-type (JZ518) and swi7 (MK226) mutant strains. The histograms displays the recombination rates for the substrate shown in panel E. Rates of total number, conversion- and deletion-type recombination events are shown. The given values are the means of recombination frequencies for independent colonies. E. Visualization of recombination rates by growth on media containing limited adenine. swi7 mutant displays increased sectoring on YE medium due to recombination at the direct repeats of ade6 in the substrate. Cells with ade6 mutations in the intact substrate turn red on YE medium due to accumulation of a slightly toxic red pigment. Cells with the recombined wild type ade6+ gene do not accumulate the pigment and are white (sectors in swi7 colony).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g006

To test whether swi7 cells have increased rates of homologous recombination (HR we used a recombination substrate that consists of a direct repeat of two ade6 heteroalleles separated by a wild-type his3+ gene [32] (Figure 6C). The majority of HR occurs between sister chromatids, and these events are normally genetically silent. However, heteroallelic direct repeats on the same chromosome enable sister chromatid recombination to be monitored genetically. This is because unequal sister chromatid recombination between heteroalleles gives rise to genetically detectable recombinants. These can occur as deletions, in which one repeat and the intervening DNA are lost through either reciprocal crossing-over, or by non-reciprocal events such as single-strand annealing or break-induced replication. Deletion events recreate a wild type ade6+ at the cost of the his3+ gene and produce cells with an Ade+His phenotype. Recombination can also proceed as a gene conversion, which maintains both repeats and their intervening sequence. Gene conversions restore one fully active ade6+ gene while leaving the his3+ gene unaltered. Thus, gene conversions produce cells with an Ade+His+ phenotype. This recombination substrate was introduced into swi7-1 background by a genetic cross. We observed much higher levels of both deletions and conversions in swi7-1 mutant strain as compared to wild type cells (Figure 6D). The increased rate of mitotic recombination in mutant cells could also be observed on YE plates with limiting adenine. On YE medium, the two ade6 mutations confer a red colour to the colony due to accumulation of a slightly toxic intermediate in the adenine biosynthesis pathway. Sectors, containing ade6+ cells, appear larger and white due to reduced abundance of this toxic intermediate. The swi7-1 mutants displayed an increased frequency of forming white sectors compared to the wild type strain, indicative of a higher recombination rate (Figure 6E).

Pol α and Fen1 work in the same pathway in the alkylation damage response

To address if Pol α has a specific role in alkylation damage repair we analysed genetic interactions between swi7-1 and four mutations namely rad13, mag1, rev3 and rad2 that affect known repair pathways. Rad13 encodes a DNA repair nuclease that acts in nucleotide excision repair (NER) [33] and has single-stranded DNA binding activity. Mag1 is a DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase that initiates base excision repair (BER) [34]. Rev3 is the catalytic subunit of the B-family trans-lesion DNA polymerase Polζ, an enzyme which has the ability to bypass cis-syn thymine-thymine (T-T) dimers [35]. Rad2 encodes a flap endonuclease-1 (Fen1), which is essential for both replication and repair. Fen1 is involved in Okazaki fragment processing during the lagging-strand DNA synthesis and in the long-patch BER pathway where it excises displaced oligonucleotides. It is also involved in resolution of Holliday junctions during homologous recombination [36].

We generated double mutants of swi7-1 with rad13, mag1, polζ and rad2 deletions by genetic crosses and compared the MMS sensitivities of single and various double mutant combinations. swi7-1 in combination with rad13, mag1 and polζ mutations had an additive effect on MMS sensitivity (Figure 7A), demonstrating that Pol α and Rad13/Mag1/polζ have distinct functions in the alkylation damage response pathway. Thus the swi7-1 mutation does not uncover a role of Pol α in either NER or BER repair pathways or directly in post-replicative trans-lesion synthesis. In contrast, swi7-1 in combination with rad2 had no additive effect on MMS sensitivity (Figure 7A) in both the chronic exposure assay and the short-term exposure assay (Figure 7B). These data suggest that Polα and Fen1 work in the same pathway in the alkylation damage response.

thumbnail

Figure 7. Genetic interactions of S. pombe swi7-1 mutant in the response to DNA damage.

A, B and C. Analysis of sensitivities of single and double mutant strains to increasing concentrations of MMS (A). Approximately 100 cells from mutant and wild type strains were plated on the medium, containing methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or hydroxyurea (HU) at concentrations given above the columns, or were exposed to UV irradiation at the indicated intensities. The plates were incubated at 33°C until colonies were formed. Strain names are as follows wt (JZ60), swi7-1 (JZ487 or JZ468), rad13 (SV66), mag1 (AM006), rev3 (SV54), rad2 (SV59), swi7rad13 (MK130), swi7mag1 (MK175), swi7-1 rev3 (MK190), swi7-1 rad2 (MK125). B. Survival of wt, swi7-1, rad2 and swi7-1 rad2 strains exposed to MMS. Logarithmically growing cultures were incubated in the presence or absence of 0.03% MMS. Samples were taken at indicated time points, and dilution series of cells for each culture were plated on YEA media and incubated at 33°C until colonies formed. The survival is shown as the relative percentage compared to the values obtained using the untreated starting cultures.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g007

Fen1 is required for formation of alkylation damage-specific repair intermediates

Since MMS sensitivity data suggest that Pol α and Fen1 work in the same pathway in the alkylation damage response we investigated whether Fen1 is required for alkylation damage-specific repair intermediates like Pol α. The alkylation damage-specific intermediate consistently observed in wild type strain was strikingly absent from the rad2 strain (Figure 8). These data suggest that Swi1, Swi3, Pol α and Fen1 act together in the alkylation damage repair pathway.

thumbnail

Figure 8. The rad2 mutation abolishes the presence of the novel alkylation damage repair intermediates.

2D-gel analysis of untreated and MMS treated wild-type and rad2 strains. The HindIII/KpnI fragment of the rDNA was analyzed in the experiment, see Figure 2 line drawing. Cells were treated with 0.03% MMS for 0.5 and 2 h as shown.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g008

Swi1, Swi3 and Fen1 might have distinct functions during alkylation damage response

swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 mutations abolish mat1 imprinting, and all three mutations cause a hypersensitivity to MMS, HU and UV. However, it is not known whether these proteins act together with Fen1 during the alkylation damage response. We therefore analyzed genetic interactions between swi1/swi3 mutations and rad2 under DNA damaging conditions. In the chronic exposure assay (Figure 9A), both swi1 and swi3 mutations in combination with rad2 displayed additive effect on MMS sensitivity. This was particularly pronounced for swi1 compared to swi3. Similar additive effects between swi1/swi3 and rad2 were observed in the short-term survival assay (Figure 9B). These data suggest that although alkylation–specific DNA intermediate fail to accumulate in swi1, swi3 and rad2 strains, Swi1, Swi3 and Fen1 might have distinct functions during the alkylation damage response.

thumbnail

Figure 9. Swi1 and Swi3 possess additional roles in the alkylation damage response.

Analysis of sensitivities of wild-type (JZ60), single swi7-1 (JZ468), rad2 (SV59), swi1 (E111), swi3 (E146) and double mutant swi7-1 rad2 (MK125), swi1 rad13 (MK239), swi3 rad2 (MK243) strains to increasing concentrations of MMS or hydroxyurea (HU). Approximately 100 cells from mutant and wild type strains were plated on the medium, containing methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or hydroxyurea (HU) at concentrations given above the columns. The plates were incubated at 33°C until colonies were formed. B. Survival curves for yeast cells exposed to MMS. Logarithmically growing cultures were treated with 0.03% MMS, samples were taken at indicated time points, and dilution series of cells for each culture were plated on YEA media and incubated at 33°C until colonies formed. Strain names are given in A.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g009

Discussion

In this study we addressed whether the swi7-1 allele that abolishes imprinting at the mat1 locus confers any other defects outside the mat1 locus. Importantly, we show that the swi7-1 mutation confers sensitivity to DNA damaging agents MMS, HU and UV (Figure 1). The level of sensitivity is similar to what previously has been observed for swi1 and swi3 mutant cells [11], [12], [13]. One question is whether the observed sensitivity is due to a partial loss of Pol α catalytic activity or whether it is due to loss of a more specialized function of Pol α conferred by the residue mutated in the swi7-1 allele. Our data does establish that the unperturbed DNA replication process is affected by swi7-1 mutation. We observed an increased level of intermediates with an mobility similar to HJs in swi7-1 strains by 2D gel analysis (Figure 4 & 5). Increased levels of HJs have previously been observed in a S. cerevisiae Pol α mutant [37]. We also observed an increased proportion of cells with a “cut” phenotype, as well as an increased level of Rad22-YFP repair foci with a peak in M/G1, suggesting that the swi7-1 mutation causes DNA damage that is mostly repaired in M-phase (Figure 2 and 6). Finally, we observed an increased level of homologous recombination in swi7-1 cells (Figure 6). All these data show that swi7-1 mutation affects the general replication process without affecting cell viability. It is noteworthy that mutations in several replication-associated enzymes like DNA polymerases, ligases, topoisomerases and DNA helicases lead to increased mitotic recombination (for reviews see [38], [39])

The genetic instability observed in the swi7-1 strain might also explain why Pol α earlier was shown to regulate chromatin organization at the mating-type locus, centromeric and telomeric regions. In that study, the swi7-1 mutation was shown to affect the physical interaction between Pol α and heterochromatin protein Swi6 [40]. However, there is no evidence that links loss of swi6 function with effects on either the DNA replication or mat1 imprinting. Potentially, this suggests that the swi7-1 point mutation affects several different functional interactions. Alternative explanation is that the loss of silencing observed in the swi7-1 background could be due to defects during replication leading to DNA damage repair processes acting at the silenced regions.

Although the observed DNA damage sensitivity or the genetic instability we observed in the swi7-1 strain could be partly due to general lowering of the Pol α catalytic function, a specific role of Pol α in alkylation damage repair might exist as the swi7-1 mutation abolishes alkylation damage induced repair intermediates. Crucially genetic data suggest that Pol α and Fen1 work in the same pathway in alkylation damage repair.

It is possible to envisage how some of the genome wide defects observed in the swi7-1 strain could be explained by its loss of the imprinting function. We have earlier proposed that ribonucleotides similar to the mat1 imprint are introduced at stalled forks at other genomic regions, the difference being that outside mat1 such ribonucleotides would be excised in the same cell cycle [41]. Our work at the mat1 imprint has shown that there are no sequence requirements other than those required for replication pausing and maintenance of the ribonucleotide imprint [42]. While the mat1imprint is shielded away from the DNA repair machinery by unknown mechanisms, imprints at other genomic regions could mark sites of DNA damage for recruitment of repair pathways. Pol α has a potential role in introducing these imprints which is affected by the swi7-1 mutation. This will explain why the swi7-1 mutants are defective in diverse processes like imprinting, intra-S checkpoint signalling and alkylation damage response. Such a repair pathway could be especially important in S. pombe that is predominantly haploid. S. pombe cells are unable to repair DNA damage by recombination with a homologous chromosome. The G1 cell-cycle in S. pombe is very short, followed by a short S-phase but a much longer G2 phase. The extended G2 phase might have evolved to permit DNA damage repair through recombination with the sister chromatid. If DNA is damaged in S-phase, the cells potentially could repair the damage in front of the replication fork. This could lead to cell death due to stalled or collapsed replication forks as repair can involve strand breakage. Alternatively the cells could replicate through damaged DNA and rely on post-replicative repair behind the replication fork in S or G2 (Figure 10). Thus, imprints like the mat1 imprint could play a crucial role for marking DNA damage for post-replicative repair when the replication fork is stalled at sites of DNA damage. Here, Swi1 and Swi3 could act to pause the replication fork. We do know that the replication fork pause MPS1 is dependent on Swi1 and Swi3 function, and that Swi1 and Swi3 are thought to have a general role at stalled replication forks [9], [11], [12], [13]. In addition, we previously showed that Swi1 and Swi3 are part of the intra-S phase alkylation damage response pathway, possibly acting to stabilize replication forks stalled at damaged bases [13].

thumbnail

Figure 10. Model figure.

Alkylation damage on the leading (left half) and lagging (right half) strand template is repaired by a rad2, swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 dependent pathway leading to the formation of single-stranded regions behind but in close proximity to the progressing fork. These intermediates are detected by 2D-gel analysis below the y-arc for the wild-type strain (Figure 2). The single-stranded regions lead to Holliday junction (HJ) formation either by formation of double-stranded breaks or by fork regression.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047091.g010

Interestingly, we detect alkylation-damage induced repair intermediates in wild-type cells that are absent from rad2, swi1, swi3 and swi7-1 strains (Figures 3 and 4). This strongly supports the notion that these four genes are directly involved in repair of alkylation damage. The intermediates run as a line below the arc of Y-shaped intermediates on 2D-gels, suggesting that large single-stranded regions and/or breaks are formed behind the replication fork in one of the arms of the Y-structured intermediates (Figure 3D & Figure 10). Interestingly, these putative alkylation damage intermediates differ from those observed in MMS-treated S. cerevisiae cells where spike signals migrating at the same position as HJ are observed [26], [27], [28], [29]. In S. cerevisiae it has been shown that the appearance of these spike signals depends on Rhp51 [27], [28]. While, we also observed an increase in the spike signal MMS-treated S. pombe cells, the increase was not as large as that observed in S. cerevisiae.

Also, the repair intermediates below the Y-arc are only observed when cells are treated with MMS and not when they are exposed to HU (Figure 3 & 5), suggesting that it is not per se the stalling of forks that leads to their formation, but a specific response to MMS damage. In this context it is interesting that while the swi7-1 mutation had additive effects with rad13, mag1, or rev3, in terms of MMS sensitivity, it does not with rad2 (Figure 7). Since rad2/Fen1 has been implicated in long patch BER, it is possible that imprints made by Pol α could play a role in long patch BER. Alkylation-specific repair intermediates are also absent in MMS-treated rad2 cells, we suggest that Fen1, Swi1, Swi3 and Pol α act together in a DNA damage repair pathway (Figure 4, 7, 8 and 9). Here it is important to note that Fen1 is a nuclease that can recognize and cleave at single as well as multiple ribonucleotides inserted into DNA [43].

Similarly, the observation that the swi1 and swi3 have additive effects when combined with rad2, while all three mutations abolish the presence of the novel alkylation damage repair intermediates (Figures 3 and 8) can be explained. Firstly, it should be noted that in the chronic exposure assay the additive effect observed when rad2 and swi3 are combined is very minor (Figure 9). Secondly, Swi1 and Swi3 might have more general functions in the response to alkylation damage. Potentially, this could be through their involvement in the intra-S phase checkpoint response [11], [12], [13]. Interestingly, we observe that swi7-1 also affects the intra-S phase checkpoint response to MMS exposure, but not the S-M checkpoint (Figure 2). Alternatively, the absence of alkylation damage repair intermediates in the swi7-1 background could indirectly affect the cells' ability to arrest the cell-cycle in response to alkylation damage.

In summary, our data suggest that Swi1, Swi3, Pol α and Fen1 act together during alkylation damage repair response. Determining how these evolutionarily conserved proteins precisely work at the sites of DNA damage is a key challenge for the future.

Materials and Methods

S. pombe strains

The following strains were used for the study: AM006 (h90, leu1-32, Δ mag1::ura4) [44]; E111 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, his2, swi1-111) [10]; E146 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, his2, swi3-146) [10]; ENY670 (h, leu1-32, ura4-D18, his3-D1, rad22-YFP::KanR) [11]; JZ60 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32); JZ468 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, swi7-1); JZ473 (h90, ade6-210, 1.5::LEU2, Δchk1::ura4+); JZ474 (h90, ade6-210, 1.5::LEU2, Δrad3::ura4+); JZ475 (h90, ade6-210, 1.5::LEU2, Δ cds1::ura4+); JZ487 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, Δura4, swi7-1); JZ518 (h, ade6-M365::pUC8/h1936, ade6-L469, leu1-32, ura4-D18, his3-D1) [45]; MK125 (h90, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi7-1, Δrad2::ura4); MK130 (h90, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi7-1, Δrad13::ura4); MK140 (h90, leu1-32, swi7-1, rad22-YFP::KanR); MK175 (h90, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi7-1, Δmag1::ura4); MK190 (h90, leu1-32, swi7-1, Δ rev3::KanR); MK226 (h90, ade6-M365::pUC8/h1936, ade6-L469, leu1-32, his3-D1, swi7-1); MK239 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi1-111, Δrad2::ura4); MK243 (h90, ade6-216, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi3-146, Δrad2::ura4); SP246 (h90, leu1-32, ura4-D18, pol1-1) [46]; SP262 (h90, leu1-32, pol1-H4) [47]; SV54 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, Δ rev3::KanR); SV59 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, Δrad2::ura4); SV66 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, Δrad13::ura4); SV232 (h90, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, pol1-13ts).

General techniques

The methods used for genetic analyses of fission yeast have been described previously [48], [49], [50]. Strains were grown in yeast extract (YE) medium supplemented with 225 mg/l of adenine (YEA medium), in YE5S medium, containing 250 mg/l of 5 amino acids (histidine, lysine, leucine, uracil, adenine), in AA-Media, containing Bacto Yeast nitrogen base added dropout amino acids mixes (types: -leu, -ura, -ade, -his), or in PMA+ medium.

Quantitative tests for sensitivity to chemical treatments and UV irradiation

For the chronic exposure assays, serial 5-fold dilutions of each strain (starting from cultures containing 0.2×106 cells/ml) were prepared in 96-well microliter plates and plated with a 48-prong replicator (Sigma) onto YEA media containing the given concentrations of methyl methansulfonate (MMS) or hydroxyurea (HU). For the UV irradiation sensitivity test, cells were plated on YEA plates and irradiated using a Stratagene UV Crosslinker with the given energy. For short-term survival assays, yeast cultures (100 ml) were incubated at 33°C until they reached logarithmical growth and either MMS (0.03%) or HU (12 mM) were added. Serial 10-fold dilutions of each strain (starting from ~5000 cells/ml) were prepared in 1 ml YEA medium using culture aliquot taken at different time points. Dilution aliquots were plated on YEA medium (3 repeats each), and incubated at 33°C until colonies were formed. Colonies were counted, and the time course of cell survival under drug treatment was calculated as the survival percentage of the wild type strain.

2D-gel electrophoresis

Cells grown in YEA media at 33°C were arrested with 0.1% sodium azide and chilled by mixing cultures with equal volume of ice in a centrifuge bottle. Approximately 2–4×109 cells were harvested, washed in cold water and frozen at −70°C. Genomic DNA was purified as described elsewhere [51], [52]. For analysis of ars3001, 10 µg of DNA was digested with either HindIII/KpnI, or BamHI (overnight, 37°C). The volume and the concentration of NaCl were increased to obtain 1 ml of DNA solution containing 1 M NaCl and purified on Benzoylated Naphthoylated DEAE-Cellulose (BND-cellulose, Sigma) for enrichment of replication intermediates. Two dimensional (2D) electrophoresis was performed as previously described [53]. First dimension electrophoresis was run overnight at 1.5 V/cm. After electrophoresis, gels were photographed with long-wave UV light, the lanes containing the DNAs of interest were cut out, placed at the top of empty 24×12 cm gel tray, and then embedded in 1.2% agarose. Second-dimension electrophoresis was run in TBE buffer, containing 0.3 µg/ml of ethidium bromide for several hours at 7.5 V/cm, 4°C. Southern analysis was done as described elsewhere. The ars3001 (for S. pombe rDNA repeat) radioactive probes were prepared using as templates the 50 ng of PCR products obtained from S. pombe genomic DNA with one of two pairs of primers (for the HindIII/Kpn1 fragment: forward- AGTACAAACAAACCAAGCGTGTTA, reverse- TCTTTCCAATGCACCGCGATGCCAACACA, for the BamHI fragment: forward- GGGATAAGGATTGGCTCTAAGG, reverse- CAATCCATCCATCCATCAAACTTTATAC).

Monitoring of homologous recombination

The method is described in detail in [32]. To test whether the recombination substrate was intact the strains were streaked from their stocks onto YE medium, containing low (10 mg/L) adenine and without histidine supplement (YE/low ade, his plates), and then after several days of incubation at 30°C, replica plated onto YE/low ade and YEA media. YEA plates allowed us to calculate the total number of colonies and YE/low ade served to determine the status of the ade6 substrate. For each strain fifteen colonies, which were red on the YE/low ade plate, were taken from YEA plates and suspended in 1 mL of water. This neat cell suspension was used to prepare 10−3 dilution series. An aliquot, 100 µL, of each neat suspension was spread on YE medium, supplemented with 200 mg/L of guanine to select for ade+ colonies and 50 µL of each 10−3 dilution were spread onto YE/low ade plates. After several days of incubation at 30°C, colonies grown on YE/guanine plates were replicated onto AA/low ade, his plates and allowed to grow. Colonies on AA/low ade plates represented total amount of viable cells, colonies on YE/guanine plates were used to count Ade+ recombinant cells, and the growth on YE/low ade, his plates enabled us to distinguish between conversion, Ade+ His+, and deletion, Ade+ His, types of recombination. Colonies were counted and the obtained data were summarized in a table and plotted using the Microsoft Excel program.

Detection of Rad22-YFP DNA repair foci

The protocol and the parental strain used are described in detail by [31]. Cells expressing Rad22-YFP were grown overnight at RT, diluted in 10 ml of YEA media and incubated at RT until they reached the mid-log phase. After incubation, cells were spun down, washed with PBS and suspended in a small amount of liquid. Five microlitres of suspension were dropped onto the slide and analysed using the API Deltavision RT system 2 and the filter for YFP.

Flow cytometry analysis

Detailed method for fission yeast is described in [54]. For flow cytometry analysis, cells were fixed in 70% ethanol, pelleted, washed in 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 7.0), and incubated for at least 6 h (at 37°C) or overnight (RT) in 50 mM sodium citrate containing 0.1 mg/ml of RNase A. After sonication, cells were stained with 1 µM Sytox Green (Molecular Probes). The analysis was performed on Becton-Dickinson FACS Calibur flow cytometer. FlowJo software (Treestar, Inc.) was used to generate the histograms.

Septation and binucleated-cells index

We used the protocol described in [55]. Cell samples were prepared as for FACS analysys using ethanol fixation. Approximately 50 µL of fixed cells were rehydrated in 1 mL water, vortexed and spun down. Water was removed and cells were suspended in a small amount of liquid. Five microliters of suspension were dropped onto slide and cells were fixed by heat at 70°C for several minutes. For nuclear and septum staining, 5 µL of mounting solution (50% glycerol, 1 mg/ml p-Phenylenediamine, antifade) containing DAPI (1 µg/ml) and Calcofluor (200 µg/ml) were added. All compounds were from Sigma. Septa and nuclei were visualized by fluorescence microscopy under ultraviolet light wavelength. Five hundred or more cells were analyzed for each sample.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MK SV JZD. Performed the experiments: TE. Analyzed the data: MK SV JZD. Wrote the paper: MK JZD PA.

References

  1. 1. Wang TS, Wong SW, Korn D (1989) Human DNA polymerase alpha: predicted functional domains and relationships with viral DNA polymerases. Faseb J 3: 14–21.
  2. 2. Singh J, Klar AJ (1993) DNA polymerase-alpha is essential for mating-type switching in fission yeast. Nature 361: 271–273. doi: 10.1038/361271a0
  3. 3. Dalgaard JZ, Klar AJ (1999) Orientation of DNA replication establishes mating-type switching pattern in S. pombe. Nature 400: 181–184.
  4. 4. Kelly M, Burke J, Smith M, Klar A, Beach D (1988) Four mating-type genes control sexual differentiation in the fission yeast. Embo J 7: 1537–1547.
  5. 5. Holmes AM, Kaykov A, Arcangioli B (2005) Molecular and cellular dissection of mating-type switching steps in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol 25: 303–311. doi: 10.1128/mcb.25.1.303-311.2005
  6. 6. Egel R (1984) The pedigree pattern of mating-type switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet 12: 429–433. doi: 10.1007/bf00417817
  7. 7. Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ (2004) RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev 18: 794–804. doi: 10.1101/gad.289404
  8. 8. Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ (2006) The wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe mat1 imprint consists of two ribonucleotides. EMBO Rep 7: 59–65. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400576
  9. 9. Dalgaard JZ, Klar AJ (2000) swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 102: 745–751. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00063-5
  10. 10. Egel R, Beach DH, Klar AJ (1984) Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 3481–3485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3481
  11. 11. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, Du LL, Russell P (2003) Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7861–7874. doi: 10.1128/mcb.23.21.7861-7874.2003
  12. 12. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, McDonald WH, Yates JR 3rd, Russell P (2004) Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 8342–8355. doi: 10.1128/mcb.24.19.8342-8355.2004
  13. 13. Sommariva E, Pellny TK, Karahan N, Kumar S, Huberman JA, et al. (2005) Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel S-phase response pathway to alkylation damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 2770–2784. doi: 10.1128/mcb.25.7.2770-2784.2005
  14. 14. Krings G, Bastia D (2004) swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14085–14090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406037101
  15. 15. Beranek DT (1990) Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 231: 11–30. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90173-2
  16. 16. Kaina B, Ochs K, Grosch S, Fritz G, Lips J, et al. (2001) BER, MGMT, and MMR in defense against alkylation-induced genotoxicity and apoptosis. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 68: 41–54. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(01)68088-7
  17. 17. Lindsay HD, Griffiths DJ, Edwards RJ, Christensen PU, Murray JM, et al. (1998) S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev 12: 382–395. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.382
  18. 18. Evensen G, Seeberg E (1982) Adaptation to alkylation resistance involves the induction of a DNA glycosylase. Nature 296: 773–775. doi: 10.1038/296773a0
  19. 19. Seeberg E, Berdal KG (1997) Repair of alkylation damage to DNA. In: Hickson LD, editor. Base excision repair of DNA damage. Georgetown, Tex: Landes Bioscience. pp. 151–168.
  20. 20. Alvino GM, Collingwood D, Murphy JM, Delrow J, Brewer BJ, et al. (2007) Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6396–6406. doi: 10.1128/mcb.00719-07
  21. 21. Pfeifer GP, You YH, Besaratinia A (2005) Mutations induced by ultraviolet light. Mutat Res 571: 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.057
  22. 22. Kobayashi H, Sato K, Komatsu Y, Morioka H, Stewart JD, et al. (1999) Effects of a high-affinity antibody fragment on DNA polymerase reactions near a (6-4) photoproduct site. Photochem Photobiol 69: 226–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb03278.x
  23. 23. Hirano T, Funahashi SI, Uemura T, Yanagida M (1986) Isolation and characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cutmutants that block nuclear division but not cytokinesis. Embo J 5: 2973–2979.
  24. 24. Kumar S, Huberman JA (2004) On the slowing of S phase in response to DNA damage in fission yeast. J Biol Chem 279: 43574–43580. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m407819200
  25. 25. de Lahondes R, Ribes V, Arcangioli B (2003) Fission yeast Sap1 protein is essential for chromosome stability. Eukaryot Cell 2: 910–921. doi: 10.1128/ec.2.5.910-921.2003
  26. 26. Mankouri HW, Ngo HP, Hickson ID (2007) Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4062–4073. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-05-0490
  27. 27. Liberi G, Maffioletti G, Lucca C, Chiolo I, Baryshnikova A, et al. (2005) Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev 19: 339–350. doi: 10.1101/gad.322605
  28. 28. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509–522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.050
  29. 29. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M (2008) SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915–920. doi: 10.1038/nature07587
  30. 30. Ostermann K, Lorentz A, Schmidt H (1993) The fission yeast rad22 gene, having a function in mating-type switching and repair of DNA damages, encodes a protein homolog to Rad52 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 5940–5944. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.25.5940
  31. 31. Noguchi E, Ansbach AB, Noguchi C, Russell P (2009) Assays used to study the DNA replication checkpoint in fission yeast. Methods Mol Biol 521: 493–507. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_28
  32. 32. Osman F, Whitby MC (2009) Monitoring homologous recombination following replication fork perturbation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Mol Biol 521: 535–552. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_31
  33. 33. Kunz C, Fleck O (2001) Role of the DNA repair nucleases Rad13, Rad2 and Uve1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe in mismatch correction. J Mol Biol 313: 241–253. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5054
  34. 34. Kanamitsu K, Tanihigashi H, Tanita Y, Inatani S, Ikeda S (2007) Involvement of 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases Mag1p and Mag2p in base excision repair of methyl methanesulfonate-damaged DNA in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Genet Syst 82: 489–494. doi: 10.1266/ggs.82.489
  35. 35. Kai M, Wang TS (2003) Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev 17: 64–76. doi: 10.1101/gad.1043203
  36. 36. Liu Y, Kao HI, Bambara RA (2004) Flap endonuclease 1: a central component of DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 589–615. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.012803.092453
  37. 37. Zou H, Rothstein R (1997) Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell 90: 87–96. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80316-5
  38. 38. Klein HL (1995) Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination. Bioessays 17: 147–159. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170210
  39. 39. Rothstein R, Gangloff S (1995) Hyper-recombination and Bloom's syndrome: microbes again provide clues about cancer. Genome Res 5: 421–426. doi: 10.1101/gr.5.5.421
  40. 40. Nakayama J, Allshire RC, Klar AJ, Grewal SI (2001) A role for DNA polymerase alpha in epigenetic control of transcriptional silencing in fission yeast. Embo J 20: 2857–2866. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2857
  41. 41. Dalgaard JZ (2012) Causes and consequences of ribonucleotide incorporation into nuclear DNA. Trends in Genet in press. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.008
  42. 42. Sayrac S, Vengrova S, Godfrey EL, Dalgaard JZ (2011) Identification of a novel type of spacer element required for imprinting in fission yeast. PLoS genetics 7: e1001328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001328
  43. 43. Rydberg B, Game J (2002) Excision of misincorporated ribonucleotides in DNA by RNase H (type 2) and FEN-1 in cell-free extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16654–16659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262591699
  44. 44. Memisoglu A, Samson L (2000) Contribution of base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and DNA recombination to alkylation resistance of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Bacteriol 182: 2104–2112. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.8.2104-2112.2000
  45. 45. Osman F, Adriance M, McCready S (2000) The genetic control of spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic intrachromosomal recombination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.. Curr Genet 38: 113–125. doi: 10.1007/s002940000145
  46. 46. D'Urso G, Grallert B, Nurse P (1995) DNA polymerase alpha, a component of the replication initiation complex, is essential for the checkpoint coupling S phase to mitosis in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 108 (Pt 9) 3109–3118.
  47. 47. Murakami H, Okayama H (1995) A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature 374: 817–819. doi: 10.1038/374817a0
  48. 48. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 194: 795–823. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l
  49. 49. Alfa C, Fantes P, Hyams J, McLeod M, Warbrick E (1993) Experiments with fission yeast. Cold Spring Harbor, NewYork.: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
  50. 50. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T (2000) Methods in Yeast genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  51. 51. Huberman JA, Spotila LD, Nawotka KA, el-Assouli SM, Davis LR (1987) The in vivo replication origin of the yeast 2 microns plasmid. Cell 51: 473–481. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90643-x
  52. 52. Huberman JA (1997) Mapping replication origins, pause sites, and termini by neutral/alkaline two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Methods 13: 247–257. doi: 10.1006/meth.1997.0524
  53. 53. Brewer BJ, Fangman WL (1987) The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51: 463–471. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90642-8
  54. 54. Sabatinos SA, Forsburg SL (2009) Measuring DNA content by flow cytometry in fission yeast. Methods Mol Biol 521: 449–461. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_25
  55. 55. Luche DD, Forsburg SL (2009) Cell-cycle synchrony for analysis of S. pombe DNA replication. Methods Mol Biol 521: 437–448. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_24