Research Article

Similar Genetic Mechanisms Underlie the Parallel Evolution of Floral Phenotypes

  • Wenheng Zhang,

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Elena M. Kramer,

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Charles C. Davis mail

    Affiliation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Published: April 27, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036033


The repeated origin of similar phenotypes is invaluable for studying the underlying genetics of adaptive traits; molecular evidence, however, is lacking for most examples of such similarity. The floral morphology of neotropical Malpighiaceae is distinctive and highly conserved, especially with regard to symmetry, and is thought to result from specialization on oil-bee pollinators. We recently demonstrated that CYCLOIDEA2–like genes (CYC2A and CYC2B) are associated with the development of the stereotypical floral zygomorphy that is critical to this plant–pollinator mutualism. Here, we build on this developmental framework to characterize floral symmetry in three clades of Malpighiaceae that have independently lost their oil bee association and experienced parallel shifts in their floral morphology, especially in regard to symmetry. We show that in each case these species exhibit a loss of CYC2B function, and a strikingly similar shift in the expression of CYC2A that is coincident with their shift in floral symmetry. These results indicate that similar floral phenotypes in this large angiosperm clade have evolved via parallel genetic changes from an otherwise highly conserved developmental program.


Numerous comparative developmental genetic studies from diverse angiosperm lineages have shown that floral zygomorphy, or bilateral symmetry, has evolved via the repeated recruitment of CYC2-like genes of the TCP (Teosinte Branched 1, CYCLOIDEA and PCF) transcription factor family ([1], reviewed in [2], [3]). These studies have revealed frequent gene duplications during the evolution of CYC2 [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] as well as a close correlation between the persistent expression of CYC2 homologs in dorsal floral organs, especially the petals. While some of this data is from correlative patterns of gene expression from non–model species [8], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], it also includes zygomorphic model species with functional data [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Furthermore, once established in zygomorphic flowered lineages, modification of this CYC2 program is associated with evolutionary variation in floral symmetry, including reversions to actinomorphy [15], [16], [17], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [31], [32]. This is particularly fascinating because floral zygomorphy has arisen at least 38 times [33], [34], [35] and is a hallmark feature of the most diverse angiosperm clades, including Asteraceae (24,000 sp.), Fabaceae (19,000 sp.), and Lamiales (23,000 sp.) [36], [37]. The evolution of floral zygomorphy is thus an important innovation in flowering plants and is thought to have arisen principally from specialization on insect pollinators [38], [39].

The tropical plant clade Malpighiaceae exhibits a strong association between floral zygomorphy and specialist insect pollinators. The floral morphology of the more than 1,000 New World species of this clade is very distinctive and highly conserved, especially with regard to symmetry and pollinator reward [40], [41], [42]. The single upright/dorsal banner petal is strongly differentiated from other petals in the corolla whorl, and helps to orient and attract a limited suite of oil bee pollinators of the tribes Centridini, Tetrapedini, and Tapinotaspidini (Fig. 1A) [41], [42], [43], [44]. The banner petal in these New World species is therefore a critical component of this plant-pollinator mutualism [41]. In the mature flower, the very narrowed base of the petals provides the bees access to oil glands, which are borne in pairs on the abaxial surface of the sepals. This stereotypical floral morphology of New World Malpighiaceae, despite tremendous variation in vegetative and fruit morphology, appears to be due to their specialization on these oil-bee pollinators [42].

We recently established the likely genetic basis for this novel form of floral zygomorphy [20]. In this study, we identified two main lineages of CYC2 in Malpighiaceae, CYC2A and CYC2B, which are derived from a duplication event coincident with the origin of the family. These loci are differentially expressed along the dorsoventral axis such that CYC2A is expressed in the dorsal banner petal and two adjacent lateral petals while CYC2B is restricted solely to the banner petal (Fig. 1A). This pattern of CYC2 expression is conserved across three phylogenetically distant New World species, Janusia guaranitica A. Juss., Byrsonima crassifolia Kunth [20], and Bunchosia glandulifera (Jacq) H.B.K. (data from the latter species newly reported here, Fig. S1A), that span the origin of the family and of this unique stereotyped floral morphology [20], [40]. In contrast, the radial flowered, species poor, outgroups of Malpighiaceae, Centroplacaceae and Elatinaceae, exhibit either no CYC2 expression or broad radial CYC2 expression at later stages of floral development, respectively [20]. A similar genetic and developmental transition, including CYC2 gene duplication and shift in the pattern of expression, was recently implicated in the transition from ancestrally radial flowers to derived bilateral flowers within the Dipsacales [23].

In contrast to high species diversity in the New World (~1170 species in 59 genera), lineages of Malpighiaceae in the Old World are relatively species-poor (ca. 140 species in 14 genera) [45]. The Old World species were derived from seven independent migrations from the New World [40], [46], [47]. Importantly, these migrants have lost their specialist oil-bee pollinators, which do not occur in the Old World [48], [49], [50]. These clades also lack most of the characteristic floral features critical to the pollination syndrome of most New World Malpighiaceae and exhibit major architectural rearrangements of their floral morphology, having evolved either radially symmetrical flowers or shifted to a different kind of zygomorphy [40] (Fig. S2). Three Old World clades in particular–Acridocarpus, African Sphedamnocarpus, and Tristellateia (Fig. 1B, F)–have evolved strikingly similar floral morphologies in parallel and are highly diverged from their closest New World relatives. In each case the Old World flowers have maintained zygomorphic corollas, which they inherited from their New World ancestors (Fig. S2), but the plane of symmetry is dramatically reoriented such that they display two dorsal petals rather than a single conspicuous banner petal. In addition to these parallel changes in symmetry, each of the three clades has lost the oil glands entirely or shifted their contents to sugars, and Acridocarpus and Tristellateia have both evolved large poricidally dehiscent anthers, suggesting that these species are likely adapted to buzz pollination (Fig. 1B) [40], [45]. These changes in the Old World reflect shifts to new pollination mechanisms in which pollen or nectar, not oil, appears to be the principal pollinator reward [45], [51], [52].

Because CYC2-like genes likely play an important role in establishing floral symmetry in Malpighiaceae, we explored the possibility that similar modifications to this conserved CYC2 symmetry program explain the parallel shifts in floral morphology that are observed in these three Old World clades. We show that in each case these species exhibit a loss of CYC2B function, and a strikingly similar shift in the expression of CYC2A that is coincident with their shift in floral symmetry. These results indicate that similar floral phenotypes in the Old World Malpighiaceae have likely evolved via parallel genetic changes from an otherwise highly conserved developmental program.

Results and Discussion

Floral development of the New and Old World Malpighiaceae

In order to understand the developmental basis of zygomorphy in both the New World and Old World Malpighiaceae, we analyzed the process by which their distinct floral forms initiate and mature. Our scanning electron micrographs demonstrate that the floral symmetry in New World species develops in the same manner as in most core eudicots [33], [53], [54]: the floral meristem is oriented with two dorsal petals (Fig. 1 C and D, Fig. S3 A, B, D to I). During development, however, this initial axis of symmetry is reoriented such that one of the two dorsal petals develops as the banner petal. This banner petal physically transitions to a dorsal medial position by rotation of the pedicel just before anthesis [50], thereby giving rise to the New World floral orientation. Establishing this secondary plane of floral symmetry is a key step in development of the New World floral zygomorphy because the placement of the banner petal in the dorsal medial position appears to be advantageous for orienting the oil bees [42], [50]. Thus, the stereotypical floral zygomorphy in New World Malpighiaceae appears to be characterized by the development of a novel axis of symmetry that is imposed onto the initial axis. Our earlier results demonstrated that the differential expression of CYC2 genes is associated with this secondary plane of floral symmetry [20].

The three Old World clades that are the focus of our study here [Acridocarpus, African Sphedamnocarpus, and Tristellateia (Fig. 1B)] are each closely related to New World species that bear the typical banner petal floral morphology, but are oriented instead with two dorsal petals. From a developmental perspective, this pattern is not due to resupination of the flower [20] but rather to the maintenance of the incipient axis of symmetry without the subsequent reorientation that occurs in New World species (Fig. 1E and Fig. S3C). In this regard, these Old World lineages exhibit a reversion to the ancestral floral orientation that characterizes rosids outside the Malpighiaceae [33], [53], [54].


Figure 1. Floral morphology, development, and CYC2 expression of Malpighiaceae.

(A), Banisteriopsis argyrophylla illustrating the stereotypical New World floral morphology and pattern of CYC2 expression in New World Malpighiaceae (expression shown in grey). (B), Acridocarpus zanzibaricus, Sphedamnocarpus angolensis, and Tristellateia australasiae (from left to right) represent three Old World floral phenotypes that have evolved in parallel from a similar New World-type ancestor. (C–E), Scanning electron micrographs showing the typical orientation of the two dorsal petals at the earliest stage of floral development in the New World Malpighiaceae species Bunchosia glandulifera (C) and Heteropterys sp. (D), and in the Old World species, Tristellateia australasiae (E). (F), Phylogeny depicting relationships of the three focal Old World clades: Acridocarpus, African Sphedamnocarpus, and Tristellateia. Grey lines highlight the radially symmetrical sister groups of Malpighiaceae, Centroplacaceae, and Elatinaceae [20]; black lines highlight Malpighiaceae species with the stereotypical New World floral morphology; red highlights the three Old World clades with parallel floral morphologies that have departed from the New World morphology. For reference, the banner petal of the New World Malpighiaceae is highlighted in yellow (C and D). Dotted lines = initial axis of floral symmetry; solid lines = final axis of floral symmetry; arrows indicate the shift in the axis of symmetry that takes place just before anthesis in New World Malpighiaceae [50]. Scale bars equal 100 μm.


Independent functional loss of CYC2B in the Old World

As a first step to investigating CYC2A and CYC2B expression in these Old World lineages, we first identified CYC2-like homologs from Acridocarpus and Sphedamnocarpus using degenerate primers and exhaustive PCR clone screening. We did not detect CYC2B in two species of Acridocarpus, A. natalitius A.Juss. and A. zanzibaricus A.Juss. (Fig. 2), with confirmation by Southern analyses in A. natalitius (Fig. S4). This is consistent with our previous study of another Old World species, Tristellateia australasiae A. Rich., which has similarly lost CYC2B [20]. In contrast, the two species of Sphedamnocarpus, S. pruriens Szyszył. and S. transvaalicus Burtt Davy, maintain both copies of CYC2A and CYC2B (Fig. 2). Locus-specific reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, however, reveals that the CYC2B copy is not expressed in S. pruriens at the late stages of floral development (Fig. S1C). These findings are in sharp contrast to those in New World Malpighiaceae, which possess and express both CYC2A and CYC2B [20] (also Fig. S1A). In all three Old World clades that have been sampled, the banner petal paralog CYC2B has been lost or is not expressed, demonstrating a striking correspondence between the loss of CYC2B function and the loss of the New World dorsal banner petal morphology. One potentially interesting hypothesis that emerges from these results relates to the divergence time estimates of these three Old World clades and the observed pattern of CYC2B loss. Acridocarpus and Tristellateia diverged from their closest New World relatives during the Eocene (~55 million years ago [mya]) and Oligocene (~30 mya), respectively [46], [47]. In contrast, Sphedamnocarpus diverged from its closest New World relatives much more recently, during the Miocene (~20 mya) [46], [47]. This raises the possibility that there has not been sufficient time for CYC2B to have been lost from Sphedamnocarpus, hence its presence in the genome despite its lack of expression.


Figure 2. Phylogeny of CYC2-like genes for Malpighiaceae.

Bayesian majority rule consensus topology shown; clades with >50% maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support and >60% Bayesian posterior probabilities depicted above lines, respectively. ML bootstrap support <50% indicated with a hyphen. Inferred gene tree is reflective of accepted species tree relationships [40]. Accessions highlighted in red include the three Old World clades examined here that exhibit parallel floral phenotypes–Acridocarpus, African Sphedamnocarpus, and Tristellateia. Accessions labeled with dotted lines signify inferred gene losses in Acridocarpus natalitius, A. zanzibaricus, Tristellateia australasiae, and T. africana. See Supplementary Table S2 for species identities and voucher information. C, Centroplacaceae; E, Elatinaceae; M, Malpighiaceae; O, Oxalidaceae.


Independent shifts of CYC2A expression pattern in the Old World

To examine how CYC2A expression has been modified in these Old World clades, we investigated its expression pattern using quantitative RT–PCR, which revealed that expression in the dorsal region of the corolla is significantly greater than in the ventral region for all species (Fig. 3 and statistics Table S1). The expression in the dorsal region of the calyx is also significantly greater than in the ventral region for T. australasiae and A. natalitius (Fig. 3 and statistics Table S1). These observations demonstrate that the three parallel shifts in floral symmetry in these Old World Malpighiaceae share very similar changes in the pattern of CYC2A expression. Interestingly, there are differences in the details in each of these cases: Tristellateia maintains CYC2A in only the two dorsal petals while Acridocarpus CYC2A expression is expanded to include the lateral petals; and Sphedamnocarpus CYC2A is even more broadly expressed, but only very weakly in the ventral petal (Fig. 3 and summary Fig. 4). In T. australasiae and A. natalitius (Fig. 3 A and B), the spatial expression of CYC2A is maintained in the dorsal region during development. In contrast, CYC2A expression in S. pruriens (Fig. 3C) is significantly decreased in all petals during the latest developmental stages. These distinctions underscore the fact that each of these three lineages independently transitioned to their Old World morphology in response to the loss of their specialist New World oil bee pollinators. CYC2A is also expressed in the stamens and carpels, but at relatively low levels of gene activity in all three species (Fig. 3). Moreover, the configuration of stamens relative to the petals in these Old World species is identical to their closest zygomorphic New World relatives. Low levels of CYC2 expression suggests that CYC2 may not play a role in the development of the androecium and gynoecium in these species of Malpighiaceae [20] (Fig. 3).


Figure 3. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) expression of CYC2-like genes for the parallel floral morphologies in the Old World Malpighiaceae Tristellateia australasiae (A) Acridocarpus natalitius (B) and Sphedamnocarpus pruriens (C).

Grayscale shading on floral diagrams summarizes the relative strength of the spatial pattern of CYC2 expression in the corolla and calyx. qRT-PCR expression data was determined for dissected floral organs at mid and late stages. Expression levels are relative to the control β-tubulin. Error bars represent standard errors. ds, dorsal sepal; ls, lateral sepal; vs, ventral sepal; dp, dorsal petal; lp, lateral petal; vp, ventral petal; st, stamens; ca, carpels; MB, medium buds ~40–60% of full size buds; LB, large buds ~70–90% of full size buds. Scale bars equal 5 mm.


The genetic basis of parallel floral phenotypes in Old World Malpighiaceae

Taken together, our current and previous [20] findings in the Malpighiaceae suggest a genetic model for both the evolution of zygomorphy in the family and its subsequent modification as lineages dispersed to novel environments involving a new pollinator selective regime. This model is critical to the ecological interactions with the oil bee pollinators and, accordingly, is conserved in diverse lineages that maintain this mutualism. CYC2 expression, particularly the banner petal expression of CYC2B, correlates with the secondary axis of floral symmetry that reorients New World flowers to place the single banner petal in the dorsal medial position. In multiple separate instances, however, members of the family have migrated to the Old World where they have lost their oil bee pollinators as well as their critical banner petal zygomorphy. In the three cases examined here, the shift in pollinators is always associated with a loss of floral reorientation and functionality of the CYC2B locus, in addition to a novel axis of symmetry in CYC2A expression. A similar decay in the zygomorphic program in response to a change in pollination syndrome has been demonstrated for a single clade of Veroniceae [21], but our sampling provides strong evidence in the context of multiple parallel events within a narrowly circumscribed plant clade. In addition, the examples here represent parallel, pollinator-mediated, modifications of the ancestral program to yield a new pattern of zygomorphy, rather than a reversion to radial symmetry similar to what is found in the close relatives of Malpighiaceae. These contrasting New and Old World patterns reinforce the conclusion that CYC2 homologs are critical to floral symmetry in this diverse family. Our current efforts are focused on examining earlier stages to determine how the dynamics of CYC2 expression correlate with the developmental shift in the plane of floral symmetry we have characterized in New World Malpighiaceae. Finally, these findings reinforce the observations that the CYC2 module is consistently recruited for the evolution of zygomorphy in angiosperms [2], [3], and newly demonstrates that once this developmental module is established within a large clade it can be modified by strikingly similar parallel genetic changes.


Figure 4. Summary of CYC2-like gene expression.

Expression of CYC2-like genes in New World Malpighiaceae [20] and in three parallel shifts in the Old World Malpighiaceae clades represented, from left to right, by Tristellateia australasiae, Acridocarpus natalitius, and Sphedamnocarpus pruriens. The blue shading of the New World Species indicates late stage CYC2 gene expression [20] (Fig. S1A). The gradient shading in Old World species, from white to black, indicates increasing intensity of CYC2 expression, respectively.


Materials and Methods

Specimen collections

Specimens of Acridocarpus natalitius are from the National Botanical Garden, Lowveld, South Africa; A. zanzibaricus from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Sphedamnocarpus pruriens from Pretoria, South Africa; Bunchosia glandulifera, Byrsonima lucida DC., and Heteropterys sp. from the Kampong Tropical Botanical Garden, the Montgomery Botanical Center in Florida, and the University of California at Davis, USA; and Tristellateia australasiae and Galphimia gracilis Bartl. are from cultivated plants at Harvard University in Massachusetts, USA (see Table S2).

Ethics statement

Collections from Tanzania and South Africa were sent as part of a collaboration with Frank M. Mbago (Curator, Herbarium DSM, Botany Department, University of Dar es Salaam) and Robert H. Archer (Researcher, National Herbarium PRE, South African National Biodiversity Institute), respectively, who held the necessary permission to collect in their respective countries.

Isolation of CYC2A and CYC2B

To isolate CYC2-like genes from our target species we used degenerate primers designed for Malpighiaceae and their closest relatives (Table S3). These included 11 degenerate forward primers and seven degenerate reverse primers. We exhaustively screened our target species using 77 primer pair combinations to identify the best primer pair for screening CYC2 gene copies. The optimal CYC2 primer pair (Forward: 5′-GCIMGIAARTTYTTYGAYYTKCAA; Reverse: 5′-GCYCKYGCYCTIGCYYTHKCYCTWGA) was chosen based on its ability to amplify many major clades of Malpighiales, including especially the sister families of Malpighiaceae. CYC2-like amplicons spanning the TCP and R domains were obtained following our previous methods [20]. More than 200 clones were screened for this effort.

Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses

The newly acquired sequences of CYC2-like genes from Acridocarpus natalitius, A. zanzibaricus, Sphedamnocarpus pruriens, and S. transvaalicus were aligned with a previously available matrix including several ingroup accessions of Malpighiaceae, and the outgroup families, Elatinaceae, Centroplacaceae, and Oxalidaceae, by eye with reference to the translated amino acid sequences using MacClade 4.06 [55]. We applied the WAG+G model of amino acid evolution to the aligned CYC2 data set as determined by the AIC criterion in ProtTEST [56]. One thousand maximum likelihood bootstrap replicates were conducted using RAxML-VI-HPC [57]. Bayesian analyses were implemented in MrBayes ver. 3.1.2 [58] under the same optimal model using default priors for the rate matrix, branch lengths, and gamma shape parameter. A Dirichlet distribution was used for the base frequency parameters and an uninformative prior was used for the starting tree topology. Four chains were initiated with a random starting tree and run for two million generations sampled every 1,000 generations. Stationarity was determined using Tracer v1.4.1. (​/). We sampled from the posterior distribution to calculate clade posterior probabilities following a burn-in of 1,000 trees. All DNA sequences of the newly acquired CYC2-like genes have been deposited in GenBank, under accession numbers JQ723742 through JQ723749.

Southern hybridization

Ten µg of genomic DNA was digested from Acridocarpus natalitius with restriction enzymes (i.e., HindIII, EcoRI, and HindIII plus EcoRI), fractionated on 0.8% agarose gels, and blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ) following the protocol in Zhang et al. [20]. A fragment containing the 3' end of the TCP domain and the variable region between the TCP and R domains was used as a template to synthesize probes for detecting CYC2-like genes. A mixture of CYC2A sequences (AnCYC2A of A. natalitius and BcCYC2A of Byrsonima crassifolia [20]) and CYC2B sequences (BcCYC2B of B. crassifolia [20]) in equal molar concentration was used as a template to synthesize our 32P labeled probe. We previously showed that the number of bands in the EcoRI digest is a reliable indicator of CYC2 copy number [20]. Here, we identified a single band in the EcoRI digest (Fig. S4A). In the HindIII single digest and HindIII+EcoRI double digest, we expected more than one band due to the presence of a single restriction site of HindIII within the probed region (Fig. S4B). As before [20], this result is identical to our results from PCR and cloning. These results further demonstrate that our PCR/clone screens provide the same estimate of gene copy number as our low stringency Southern hybridizations.

RNA sample preparations

We examined two developmental stages for organ specific CYC2 expression. Floral organs from the latest stages were dissected in the field from multiple flower buds ranging in size from ~70–90% of bud size just before anthesis. Earlier stage flower buds were also collected from each species. All materials were preserved in cryogenic containers, and were processed in the lab using the RNAqueous kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Floral organs from earlier, medium stage samples, ~50% of flower bud size just before anthesis, were dissected in the lab from a single bud. These buds were dissected using the RNAlater®-ICE Kit (Ambion-Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA). Frozen buds were transferred to 1 ml of –80°C RNAlater®-ICE. Vacuum infiltration was applied followed by incubation in the same solution at –20°C for 16 hours. Floral dissection was then performed using a dissecting microscope at room temperature. The micro-dissected samples were processed using the RNAqueous Micro kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). DNA contamination was removed with a DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). RNA quality was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Nano Labchip® kit for our pooled samples and the RNA 6000 Pico Labchip kit for each organ dissected from a single bud (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Additionally, RNA quality in all five petals and sepals were analyzed separately for Acridocarpus natalitius, Sphedamnocarpus pruriens, and Tristellateia australasiae.

Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR

RT-PCR was performed as previously described [20] using locus specific primers (Table S4) to examine the expression of CYC2. The sequence identity of RT-PCR fragments was further confirmed by sequencing.

Quantitative RT-PCR and statistical analysis

qRT-PCR reactions were conducted using PerfeCTa® SYBR® Green FastMix®, Low ROX™ (Quanta BioSciences, Inc., Gathersburg, MD) using the Stratagene Mx3005P QPCR System. Class I β-tubulin was used as a control to normalize the qRT-PCR [59]. The stable expression of β-tubulin was confirmed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR (data not shown). CYC2 expression levels were calculated relative to β-tubulin using the 2-ΔΔCT method [60]. Absence of genomic DNA was confirmed with our β-tubulin control, which spanned a ~90-bp intron region. No β-tubulin amplicons were observed for the higher molecular weight intron bearing copy. Thus, our RNA preparations were free of genomic contamination. The identity of all amplicons was confirmed by sequencing. One biological replicate (i.e., one extraction from >30 flower buds from an individual plant) was analyzed for the latest stages; three biological replicates (i.e., three extractions from three flower buds from an individual plant) were analyzed for the medium sized bud stages. Three technical replicates (i.e., three separate qRT-PCRs from a single extracted sample) were analyzed for each biological replicate. Standard errors were calculated from all technical replicates. The statistical significance of the differential pattern of spatial gene expression for the medium sized bud samples was examined for the sepals and petals, respectively, as implemented in the software package REST© 2009 (Technische UniversitŠt München, Qiagen) [61]. We tested the null hypothesis that there was no significant difference between the spatial pattern of gene expression within the calyx and corolla whorls (e.g., relative expression levels in the ventral versus the dorsal petals). Our non-parametric analysis included 10,000 random reallocations of the relative spatial expression data for each pair-wise comparison we made (e.g., ventral petal expression versus dorsal petal expression). For example, to determine whether RNA abundance of CYC2A in the dorsal petals is significantly higher than that in the ventral petal we applied REST to normalize the CYC2 expression ratios of beta-Tubulin, correct the fold changes based on primer efficiencies, and calculate p-values through a pair-wise reallocation randomization analysis (using 10,000 replicates) of the two groups (e.g., ventral petal expression versus dorsal petal expression) [61]. These results are reported in Table S1.

Morphology-based character state reconstruction of floral symmetry

We used maximum likelihood (ML) character state reconstruction as implemented in Mesquite version 2.6 [62] to infer the evolution of floral symmetry in Malpighiaceae and its closest relatives, Elatinaceae and Centroplacaceae. The analysis was done using the phylogeny and methods described by Zhang et al. (2010), and by scoring each species as zygomorphic or radial flowered.

Scanning electronic microscopy

Inflorescences of Bunchosia glandulifera, Byrsonima lucida, Galphimia gracilis, Heteropterys sp., and Tristellateia australasiae were fixed in FAA in the field and transferred to 70% ethanol for storage. Young inflorescences from each species were prepared in 2% osmium for 4 hours at room temperature, washed, and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol. Samples were then coated with Platinum-Palladium and observed with a Zeiss EVO 50 microscope at 10–20 keV. Images were enhanced with Adobe Photoshop.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Locus-specific RT-PCR for CYC2-like gene expression in Malpighiaceae. (A), Bunchosia glandulifera shows the conserved CYC2A and CYC2B expression in New World Malpighiaceae [20]. (B–C), The temporal pattern of CYC2 expression in the Old World Malpighiaceae Acridocarpus zanzibaricus (B) and Sphedamnocarpus pruriens (C). ACTIN-specific primers were used as a positive control. Abbreviations are as follows: dp, dorsal petal; lp, lateral petal; vp, ventral petal; s+c, stamens and carpals; uc, upper calyx; lc, lower calyx; MB, medium buds ~40–60% of full size buds (MB1, ~40–50%; MB2, ~50–60%); LB, large buds ~70–90% of full size buds; FL, open flowers. Scale bars equal 5 mm.



Figure S2.

Ancestral character state reconstruction of floral symmetry. Maximum likelihood analysis indicates the relative likelihood of floral symmetry at each node. Accessions highlighted in red include the three Old World clades examined here that exhibit parallel floral phenotypes–Acridocarpus, African Sphedamnocarpus, and Tristellateia.



Figure S3.

Floral development of Malpighiaceae. (A–I), All Malpighiaceae species, Bunchosia glandulifera (A), Heteropterys sp. (B), Tristellateia australasiae (C), Byrsonima lucida (D–F), and Galphimia gracilis (G–I), have an initial axis of floral symmetry with two petals in the dorsal position relative to the axis. In New World Malpighiaceae this initial axis (F, I; dotted line) is replaced by a final axis of floral symmetry (F, I; solid line) in which the single banner petal (in yellow) is in the dorsal-most position. The Old World species [e.g., Tristellateia australasiae (C)] do not exhibit this secondary reorientation. Asterisks = the inflorescence apices; dotted lines = initial axis of floral symmetry; solid lines = final axis of floral symmetry; arrows indicate the rotation of the floral axis achieved before anthesis [50]. Note, the direction of reorientation varies from flower-to-flower and can be predicted using the position of the carpel primordia and the inner-most, banner petal [20]. Scale bars equal 400 μm in (A–E, G–H), and 100 μm in (F, I).



Figure S4.

CYC2 Southern hybridization results for Acridocarpus natalitius. (A), Restriction digests using EcoRI (E), HindIII (H), and EcoRI+HindIII (E+H) are shown for genomic DNA of A. natalitius. Lane contains CYC2 plasmid DNA as controls to test probe efficiency. (B), Restriction cut site was determined from sequence analysis and are indicated on the CYC2 gene copy shown at bottom. Arrows and numbers indicate molecular size markers (in base pairs). The number of bands in the EcoRI digest reflects the CYC2 copy number based on our previous study [20]. The single band in the EcoRI digest suggests one copy of the CYC2 gene in Acridocarpus natalitius. In the HindIII and double digests, we expected more than one band due to the presence of a restriction site within the probed region.



Table S1.

Statistical strength of differential pattern of spatial gene expression within the corolla and calyx whorls.



Table S2.

Species sampled, with collection locations, voucher information, and CYC2 loci.



Table S3.

Degenerate PCR primers used in this study.



Table S4.

qRT-PCR annealing temperatures, amplification efficiencies, and primer sequences used in this study.




We thank W. Anderson, D. Boufford, P. Endress, and members of the Davis and Kramer laboratories for comments on our manuscript; R. Archer, D. Goldman, P. Griffith, D. Lee, F. Mbago, and C. Morse for help with fieldwork; the Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems, the University of Zurich Center for Microscopy and Image Analysis, and especially L. Nikolov for assistance with the scanning electron micrographs; and J. Puzey with quantitative RT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Analyzed the data: WZ EMK CCD. Wrote the paper: WZ EMK CCD. Conceived and designed the research: WZ EMK CCD. Performed the research: WZ.


  1. 1. Soltis DE, Smith SA, Cellinese N, Wurdack KJ, Tank DC, et al. (2011) Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98: 704–730.
  2. 2. Preston JC, Hileman LC (2009) Developmental genetics of floral symmetry evolution. Trends Plant Sci 14: 147–154.
  3. 3. Citerne H, Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C (2010) The evolution of floral symmetry. In: Kader JC, Delseny M, editors. Advances in Botanical Research. London: Elsevier. pp. 85–137.
  4. 4. Citerne HL, Moller M, Cronk QCB (2000) Diversity of cycloidea-like genes in Gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann Bot 86: 167–176.
  5. 5. Hileman LC, Baum DA (2003) Why do paralogs persist? Molecular evolution of CYCLOIDEA and related floral symmetry genes in Antirrhineae (Veronicaceae). Molec Biol Evol 20: 591–600.
  6. 6. Reeves PA, Olmstead RG (2003) Evolution of the TCP gene family in Asteridae: cladistic and network approaches to understanding regulatory gene family diversification and its impact on morphological evolution. Molec Biol Evol 20: 1997–2009.
  7. 7. Ree RH, Citerne HL, Lavin M, Cronk QCB (2004) Heterogeneous selection on LEGCYC paralogs in relation to flower morphology and the phylogeny of Lupinus (Leguminosae). Molec Biol Evol 21: 321–331.
  8. 8. Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of the “ECE” (CYC/TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 9101–9106.
  9. 9. Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ (2005) Duplications in CYC-like genes from Dipsacales correlate with floral form. Int J Pl Sci 166: 357–370.
  10. 10. Smith JF, Hileman LC, Powell MP, Baum DA (2004) Evolution of GCYC, a Gesneriaceae homolog of CYCLOIDEA, within Gesnerioideae (Gesneriaceae). Molec Phylogenet Evol 31: 765–779.
  11. 11. Citerne HL, Luo D, Pennington RT, Coen E, Cronk QCB (2003) A phylogenomic investigation of CYCLOIDEA-like TCP genes in the Leguminosae. Pl Physiol 131: 1042–1053.
  12. 12. Fukuda T, Yokoyama J, Maki M (2003) Molecular evolution of cycloidea-like genes in Fabaceae. J Molec Evol 57: 588–597.
  13. 13. Gubitz T, Caldwell A, Hudson A (2003) Rapid molecular evolution of CYCLOIDEA-like genes in Antirrhinum and its relatives. Molec Biol Evol 20: 1537–1544.
  14. 14. Chapman MA, Leebens-Mack JH, Burke JM (2008) Positive selection and expression divergence following gene duplication in the sunflower CYCLOIDEA gene family. Molec Biol Evol 25: 1260–1273.
  15. 15. Hileman LC, Kramer EM, Baum DA (2003) Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100: 12814–12819.
  16. 16. Zhou X-R, Wang Y-Z, Smith JF, Chen R (2008) Altered expression patterns of TCP and MYB genes relating to the floral developmental transition from initial zygomorphy to actinomorphy in Bournea (Gesneriaceae). New Phytol 178: 532–543.
  17. 17. Gao Q, Tao J-H, Yan D, Wang Y-Z, Li Z-Y (2008) Expression differentiation of CYC-like floral symmetry genes correlated with their protein sequence divergence in Chirita heterotricha (Gesneriaceae). Development Genes and Evolution 218: 341–351.
  18. 18. Du Z-Y, Wang Y-Z (2008) Significance of RT-PCR expression patterns of CYC-like genes in Oreocharis benthamii (Gesneriaceae). J Syst Evol 46: 23–31.
  19. 19. Citerne HL, Pennington RT, Cronk QCB (2006) An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12017–12020.
  20. 20. Zhang W, Kramer EM, Davis CC (2010) Floral symmetry genes and the origin and maintenance of zygomorphy in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 6388–6393.
  21. 21. Preston JC, Martinez CC, Hileman LC (2011) Gradual disintegration of the floral symmetry gene network is implicated in the evolution of a wind-pollination syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 2343–2348.
  22. 22. Pang HB, Sun QW, He SZ, Wang YZ (2010) Expression pattern of CYC-like genes relating to a dorsalized actinomorphic flower in Tengia (Gesneriaceae). J Syst Evol 48: 309–317.
  23. 23. Howarth DG, Martins T, Chimney E, Donoghue MJ (2011) Diversification of CYCLOIDEA expression in the evolution of bilateral flower symmetry in Caprifoliaceae and Lonicera (Dipsacales). Ann Bot 107: 1521–1532.
  24. 24. Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, et al. (1999) Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99: 367–376.
  25. 25. Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E (1996) Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794–799.
  26. 26. Busch A, Zachgo S (2007) Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 16714–16719.
  27. 27. Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E (1999) The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J 18: 215–222.
  28. 28. Wang Z, Luo YH, Li X, Wang LP, Xu SL, et al. (2008) Genetic control of floral zygomorphy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 10414–10419.
  29. 29. Feng X, Zhao Z, Tian Z, Xu S, Luo Y, et al. (2006) Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 4970–4975.
  30. 30. Broholm SK, Tähtiharju S, Laitinen RAE, Albert VA, Teeri TH, et al. (2008) A TCP domain transcription factor controls flower type specification along the radial axis of the Gerbera (Asteraceae) inflorescence. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 9117–9122.
  31. 31. Song CF, Lin QB, Liang RH, Wang YZ (2009) Expressions of ECE-CYC2 clade genes relating to abortion of both dorsal and ventral stamens in Opithandra (Gesneriaceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 244.
  32. 32. Preston JC, Kost MA, Hileman LC (2009) Conservation and diversification of the symmetry developmental program among close relatives of snapdragon with divergent floral morphologies. New Phytologist 182: 751–762.
  33. 33. Donoghue MJ, Ree RH, Baum DA (1998) Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sci 3: 311–317.
  34. 34. Stebbins GL (1974) Flowering plant: evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  35. 35. Westerkamp C, Classen-Bockhoff R (2007) Bilabiate flowers: the ultimate response to bees? Ann Bot. pp. 361–374.
  36. 36. Stevens PF (2001) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. 12:​b/. Accessed 2011 July.
  37. 37. Sargent RD (2004) Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc Roy Soc London, Ser B, Biol Sci 271: 603–608.
  38. 38. Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998) Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29: 345–373.
  39. 39. Endress PK (2001) Evolution of floral symmetry. Curr Opinion Pl Biol 4: 86–91.
  40. 40. Davis CC, Anderson WR (2010) A complete generic phylogeny of Malpighiaceae inferred from nucleotide sequence data and morphology. American Journal of Botany 97: 2031–2048.
  41. 41. Vogel S (1974) Ölblumen und ölsammelnde Bienen [Oil flowers and oil-collecting bees]. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7: 283–547.
  42. 42. Anderson WR (1979) Floral conservatism in neotropical Malpighiaceae. Biotropica 11: 219–223.
  43. 43. Araújo VA, Antonini Y, Araújo APA (2006) Diversity of bees and their floral resources at altitudinal areas in the Southern Espinhaço Range, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 35: 30–40.
  44. 44. Sigrist MR, Sazima M (2004) Pollination and reproductive biology of twelve species of neotropical Malpighiaceae: stigma morphology and its implications for the breeding system. Ann Bot 94: 33–41.
  45. 45. Davis CC (2002) Madagasikaria (Malpighiaceae): a new genus from Madagascar with implications for floral evolution in Malpighiaceae. Amer J Bot 89: 699–706.
  46. 46. Davis CC, Fritsch PW, Bell CD, Mathews S (2004) High-latitude tertiary migrations of an exclusively tropical clade: evidence from Malpighiaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: S107–S121.
  47. 47. Davis CC, Bell CD, Mathews S, Donoghue MJ (2002) Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 6833–6837.
  48. 48. Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
  49. 49. Anderson WR (1990) The origin of the Malpighiaceae: the evidence from morphology. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 64: 210–224.
  50. 50. Vogel S (1990) History of the Malpighiaceae in the light of pollination ecology. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 55: 130–142.
  51. 51. Yampolsky C, Yampolsky H (1922) Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl Genet 3: 1–62.
  52. 52. Anderson WR. Dioecy in the Malpighiaceae; 2002 6 August; Madison, WI.
  53. 53. Cubas P, Coen E, Zapater JMM (2001) Ancient asymmetries in the evolution of flowers. Curr Biol 11: 1050–1052.
  54. 54. Eichler A (1878) Malpighiaceen. Blüthendiagramme Teil II. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. 338 p.
  55. 55. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2003) MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. version 4.0.6 ed: Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  56. 56. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D (2005) ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21: 2104–2105.
  57. 57. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
  58. 58. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
  59. 59. Oakley RV, Wang YS, Ramakrishna W, Harding SA, Tsai CJ (2007) Differential expansion and expression of alpha- and beta-tubulin gene families in Populus. Plant Physiology 145: 961–973.
  60. 60. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25: 402–408.
  61. 61. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L (2002) Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 10.
  62. 62. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2009) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. version 2.6.​uite.html. Accessed 2012 March 30.