Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Glucuronyltransferase GlcAT-P Is Required for Stretch Growth of Peripheral Nerves in Drosophila

Abstract

During development, the growth of the animal body is accompanied by a concomitant elongation of the peripheral nerves, which requires the elongation of integrated nerve fibers and the axons projecting therein. Although this process is of fundamental importance to almost all organisms of the animal kingdom, very little is known about the mechanisms regulating this process. Here, we describe the identification and characterization of novel mutant alleles of GlcAT-P, the Drosophila ortholog of the mammalian glucuronyltransferase b3gat1. GlcAT-P mutants reveal shorter larval peripheral nerves and an elongated ventral nerve cord (VNC). We show that GlcAT-P is expressed in a subset of neurons in the central brain hemispheres, in some motoneurons of the ventral nerve cord as well as in central and peripheral nerve glia. We demonstrate that in GlcAT-P mutants the VNC is under tension of shorter peripheral nerves suggesting that the VNC elongates as a consequence of tension imparted by retarded peripheral nerve growth during larval development. We also provide evidence that for growth of peripheral nerve fibers GlcAT-P is critically required in hemocytes; however, glial cells are also important in this process. The glial specific repo gene acts as a modifier of GlcAT-P and loss or reduction of repo function in a GlcAT-P mutant background enhances VNC elongation. We propose a model in which hemocytes are required for aspects of glial cell biology which in turn affects the elongation of peripheral nerves during larval development. Our data also identifies GlcAT-P as a first candidate gene involved in growth of integrated peripheral nerves and therefore establishes Drosophila as an amenable in-vivo model system to study this process at the cellular and molecular level in more detail.

Introduction

During animal development and growth, the nervous system needs to expand in conjunction with the general expansion of the body. Crucial to this process is the extension of integrated nerve fibers, which contain axons connecting motoneurons in the central nervous system (CNS) to their peripheral targets, muscles and sensory neurons in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) connecting to their synaptic partners in the CNS. Neurite outgrowth, via growth-cone mediated mechanisms and growth-cone guidance, towards a target has been extensively studied [1], [2]. Current models suggest that during development axonal elongation occurs by extension of the growth cone [3]. However, once the growth cone reaches its final target and is fully connected and thus tightly integrated, growth-cone related axonal elongation mechanisms are unlikely functional any longer. Mechanical forces have been postulated to stimulate elongation of integrated axons as the animal grows [4]. This distinct process has been recently referred to as “stretch growth of integrated axon tracts” [5]. Examples of such extreme axonal stretch growth, where animal growth supplies constant mechanical tension on nerves and white matter tracts, are observed throughout the animal kingdom [6], [7]. As the anterior-posterior body axis of an animal extends during growth, the distance between most neuronal somata in the CNS and PNS and their respective target cells increases dramatically, exerting tensile forces on the axons within the nerves. These forces would normally stimulate the addition of cytoskeletal elements, axolemma and other building materials along the axon to compensate for the mechanical strain. In vitro studies have demonstrated that integrated axon tracts can undergo stretch growth [5], [8], [9]. Several studies have been reported using explanted neurons from various organisms to understand stretch induced axonal elongation in cell culture in vitro [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] (reviewed in [16]). However, elongation of integrated axons is not understood at the molecular level particularly at the stage of a developing organism in vivo, partly due to the lack of mutants of genes involved in this process.

Drosophila offers an amenable model system to study the process of stretch growth of integrated axons, due to the high growth rate of its larval body during development as well as its compliance to genetic analyses [17]. Importantly, extensive growth is observed during the four days of larval development. During this phase, motoneuron axons that established connectivity to their muscle targets during embryogenesis have to elongate in parallel to the expansion of the larval body. However, very little is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling the extension of integrated peripheral nerves/axons during Drosophila larval development.

Post-translational modifications of proteins are known to be involved in nervous system development [18]. In particular, glycosylation of membrane-targeted and secreted proteins is an essential process (reviewed in [19]). Glycosyltransferases, which transfer monosaccharide units to an acceptor molecule, are responsible for the synthesis of carbohydrate moieties on proteins. The carbohydrate epitope Human Natural Killer 1 (HNK-1), found on several cell adhesion molecules such as the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM; [20]), is spatially and temporally regulated during development of the central and peripheral nervous systems. HNK-1 is assumed to be involved in cell-cell interactions such as cell adhesion [21], migration [22] and neurite extension [23]. The HNK-1 epitope, comprising of a unique trisaccharide structure, HSO3-3GlcAβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc-, is sequentially synthesized by the glucuronosyltransferase P (GlcAT-P) or the glucuronosyltransferase S (GlcAT-S) and by a specific sulphotransferase (HNK-1ST) [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. The HNK-1 carbohydrate is also crucial for maintaining proper neural function [29]. GlcAT-P glucuronyltransferase activity is also required for proteoglycan and glycoprotein biosynthesis [30], [31]. Another class of proteins modified by GlcAT-P is extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and some ECM proteins are known to bear the HNK-1 epitope [20]. In Drosophila, production and secretion of several ECM molecules is an essential function of hemocytes [32]. Besides ECM deposition, hemocytes are also involved in the clearance of apoptotic cells. Possibly due to the above mentioned functions, hemocyte migration along their normal routes and arrival at their correct target tissues is vital for development and survival [32]. A single GlcAT-P ortholog is present in metazoan genomes, including humans, although, three paralogs have been characterized in almost all metazoans: GlcAT-P (also termed β-1, 3-glucuronyltransferase 1 (B3GAT1)), GlcAT-S and GlcAT-I [33]. GlcAT-P has been described as the predominant glycosyltransferase for HNK-1 epitope biosynthesis in the brain. Human GlcAT-P (B3GAT1) has been implicated as a candidate gene for schizophrenia-like psychosis [34] and b3gat1 knock-out mice have been reported to have synaptic plasticity defects [35], [36]. Furthermore, GlcAT-P loss of function resulted in head morphogenesis defects in Medaka [37]. These studies together demonstrate a crucial role for GlcAT-P in nervous system development and/or function. However, despite the existence of a fly ortholog, very little is known about the role of GlcAT-P in the development and/or function of the Drosophila nervous system.

Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of novel alleles of the GlcAT-P gene which we termed brave (brv). brv mutants are characterized by an elongated larval ventral nerve cord (VNC). We demonstrate that VNC elongation in brv mutants occurs during larval development and not during embryogenesis. We show that GlcAT-P is expressed in a subset of central and peripheral glia, and neurons in the larval CNS. We provide evidence that in brv mutant larvae the peripheral nerves are shorter as compared to wild-type and as a consequence, in GlcAT-P mutants, the VNC is possibly under mechanical tension and most likely responds by elongation along the anterior-posterior axis. This suggests a function of GlcAT-P in the growth of integrated peripheral nerves during larval development. We further demonstrate that for growth of peripheral nerves GlcAT-P is critically required in hemocytes. Finally, we identify the glial specific gene repo as a genetic modifier of GlcAT-P as the VNC elongation phenotype is dramatically enhanced if the repo gene dose is reduced in a brv mutant background. Thus, we suggest that GlcAT-P is a major component of the genetic network required in hemocytes and glia for stretch growth of integrated peripheral nerve fibers during Drosophila larval development. Our work is the first to identify a gene linked to the growth of peripheral nerves.

Results

Isolation and genetic characterization of four novel GlcAT-P alleles

To identify novel genes involved in larval brain morphogenesis, we carried out an EMS screen in the genetic background of DOPA-decarboxylase-GAL4 (DDC-GAL4); UAS-GFP transgenic flies. In these flies, the GFP reporter protein is localized in the cytoplasm of DDC-expressing cells, which allows easy visualization of the first (L1), second (L2) and third instar (L3) larval CNS [38]. Three pupal lethal mutants were isolated from the screen showing a dramatically 2–3 times extended larval ventral nerve cord (VNC) as compared to the VNC of wild-type controls (Figure 1A, B). In addition to the extension in the anterior-posterior axis, the mutant VNCs also displayed a considerable reduction in circumference. Moreover, the brain lobes in brv mutants were oval in shape (in the anterior-posterior direction), unlike their round morphology in wild-type. Genetically, these three mutations fell into one complementation group, demonstrating that they were independent alleles of the same gene, which we termed brave (brv). Accordingly, the three mutants were termed brv1, brv2 and brv3.

thumbnail
Figure 1. brv mutations are novel alleles of Drosophila GlcAT-P.

(A, B) Phase contrast pictures of wild-type (brv+) and brv1 mutant L3 larva brains showing the elongation of the larval VNC in brv (B). Bar: 50 µm. (C) Graphical display of the deficiencies (Df) used in the complementation test in which the chromosomal region was narrowed to 60 kb. (+), (-) indicate complementing and non-complementing Df, respectively. (D) Illustration of the structure of the GlcAT-P locus flanked by the predicted genes CG14142 and CG6199. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. Exons are boxed and translated regions are represented by filled boxes. The gray box indicates an exon which is spliced into one but not the other isoform. The positions in which the brv1, brv2 and brv3 alleles are mutated are indicated. (E) Analysis of GlcAT-P protein expression. Protein extracts from wild-type (brv+), Df(3L)GlcAT-P, brv1, brv2 and brv3 mutant L3 larvae were blotted with an anti-GlcAT-P antibody. Tub: α-tubulin loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g001

By deletion mapping, we were able to assign a region on the third chromosome spanning 10 potential candidate genes (Figure 1C) to the brv mutants. By sequence analysis of both the genomic DNA and the cDNAs from those 10 genes, we could demonstrate that all three brv alleles were single point mutations in the GlcAT-P gene. In brv1, a G to A transition at the splice acceptor site located immediately before the start of the 7th exon resulted in a 14 bp deletion in the transcript RNA sequence due to a cryptic splicing site. As a result, a frame shift was introduced changing the amino acid sequence of the following 160 residues, before ending in a premature stop codon (see Figure 1D; Figure S1A, B). brv2 was found to be a G to A transition leading to a premature stop codon at the 10th amino acid of the 7th exon of GlcAT-P (Figure S1C). Finally, brv3 was characterized as a T to A transversion in the 27th position of the last (8th) exon resulting in a non-synonymous Leu to Gln polymorphism (conserved non-polar to polar amino acid) in this position (Figure S1D, E).

To demonstrate that the observed brv mutant phenotype reflects a loss of GlcAT-P function and is not due to potential second site mutations, we followed two approaches: firstly, using the FRT containing transposons PBac{PB}CG14142c00688 and PBac{PB}c01618, we generated a GlcAT-P null allele via flippase-induced precise deletion [39], [40]. Precise deletion of GlcAT-P (henceforth referred to as Df(3L)GlcAT-P) was verified by PCR analysis and sequencing (data not shown). In addition, either complete depletion (for Df(3L)GlcAT-P), brv1 and brv2) or strong reduction (for brv3) of the GlcAT-P protein was demonstrated by immunoblotting using an anti-GlcAT-P antibody (Figure 1E). Df(3L)GlcAT-P homozygous larvae died during pupal stages and showed an extended larval VNC phenotype which was indistinguishable from the other brv alleles. Moreover, Df(3L)GlcAT-P failed to rescue the brv1, brv2 and brv3 mutant alleles in complementation tests. These findings suggest that brv1, brv2 and brv3 are functional null alleles. Secondly, a genomic construct containing exons 3 to 8 of GlcAT-P (P[acman] genomic construct CH322-82E19) rescued the larval brain defects and the pupal lethality of all three brv mutant alleles (Figure 1D). The dispensability of the upstream promoter region and the first two untranslated exons of GlcAT-P was surprising, but agreed with genetic evidence that a deficiency also lacking these elements (Df(3L)BSC379) genetically complemented the brv mutations (Figure 1D). This suggests that alternative functional promoters are present just upstream of the third exon of GlcAT-P. Although all 4 brv mutant alleles are generally pupal lethal, we found adult escapers (∼10%, n = 200) for all alleles. The escapers almost always showed developmental defects in the legs (∼98%, n = 100) and some had rudimentary wings (∼30%, n = 100).

GlcAT-P is contributed maternally (see BDGP; http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/bquery.pl?qtype=report&find=CG6207&searchfield=CG). To address the function of maternally expressed GlcAT-P, we generated brv1 germline clones using the FLP-DFS technique [41]. We could not detect an abnormal phenotype in the nervous system of embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic GlcAT-P (data not shown; see below), indicating that this gene is dispensable for embryonic nervous system development.

GlcAT-P is a key enzyme for HNK-1 epitope biosynthesis in the nervous system [42]. In mice, depletion of GlcAT-P results in an almost complete loss of HNK-1 expression in the brain [35]. On the contrary, Drosophila Df(3L)GlcAT-P larvae showed a similar pattern of HNK-1 modified proteins on immunoblots of brain lysates when compared to wild-type (Figure S2A). To test for possible redundancy of GlcAT-P and GlcAT-S, an anti-GlcAT-S antibody was used in immunoblots of protein extracts from Df(3L)GlcAT-P larval brains. GlcAT-S-specific bands were clearly detected (Figure S2A). Thus, functional redundancy of GlcAT-P and GlcAT-S might explain the presence of HNK-1 in Df(3L)GlcAT-P larva.

GlcAT-P is expressed in a subset of glia, VUM motoneurons and mushroom body neurons

To study the expression pattern of GlcAT-P during larval development, we raised an anti-GlcAT-P antibody. However, we did not obtain specific signals in whole mount L3 larval brains using standard immunohistochemistry. To evaluate the functionality of the antibody, we performed immunolabeling with wing imaginal discs from transgenic larvae carrying dppblink-GAL4 and UAS-GlcAT-P. A clear signal was detected along the anterior posterior border of the wing disc (Figure S2B) which was in accordance with the endogenous dppblink-GAL4 expression pattern. Using an EYFP-tagged Golgi-specific protein (Sqh::EYFP-Golgi, [43]), we detected the over-expressed GlcAT-P protein in the Golgi apparatus (Figure S2C), where GlcAT-P is normally localized [44]. These findings indicate that the antibody specifically recognizes GlcAT-P protein in an over-expression paradigm in the right cellular compartment. As an alternative approach, we generated N-terminal as well as C-terminal EGFP-tagged fusion constructs of GlcAT-P by recombineering [45], using P[acman] genomic constructs containing the entire GlcAT-P locus (see methods). However, neither could we detect any specific EGFP signal in immunohistochemistry experiments, nor did the fusion constructs rescue the brv mutants, indicating that the EGFP tagging impairs GlcAT-P sub-cellular localization and/or function. We also attempted in situ hybridization experiments with GlcAT-P probes in the larval brain. However, although the probe was shown to work specifically when GlcAT-P was over-expressed in wing discs (data not shown), any in situ signal above background was not observed in the larval brain. Lastly, we made use of a GAL4-containing transposon inserted at the GlcAT-P locus (Figure 1D, henceforth referred to as GlcAT-P-GAL4). When used to drive expression of the reporter genes UAS-nβgal or UAS-mCD8-mCherry, GlcAT-P-GAL4 showed expression in the salivary gland primordia, amnioserosa and gut during embryogenesis (Figure S3A, B; data not shown), mirroring most aspects of the endogenous in situ hybridization expression pattern (see BDGP; http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/bquery.pl?qtype=report&find=CG6207&searchfield=CG). This indicates that GlcAT-P-GAL4 recapitulates the endogenous expression pattern of GlcAT-P. In the larva, reporter expression was detected in the tracheal system which connects to the VNC (data not shown). GlcAT-P-GAL4 drove reporter gene expression in the nervous system in sets of neurons in the brain lobes (Figure 2A–G), the VNC (Figure 2H–P) as well as in the peripheral nerves emanating from the VNC (Figure 2Q–S). Reporter gene expression was detected in a subset of glial cells in the brain and the VNC. In addition, GAL4 was expressed in most, but not all, of the peripheral nerve glia. Within the larval brain lobes, GAL4 was also detected in mushroom body neurons (Figure 2D–G). In the VNC GlcAT-P-GAL4 expression was also found in two VNC neurons per neuromere (arrows in Figure 2M, N). Based on their location in ventral positions of the ventral midline, their bifurcating axons (arrowheads in Figure 2N) leaving the VNC through the peripheral nerves (red arrows in Figure 2N) and the transcriptional activity of a VUM-specific GAL4 line (807-GAL4, see Figure S5), these neurons were characterized as ventral-unpaired-median (VUM)-motoneurons [46], [47].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Analysis of GlcAT-P expression as revealed by GlcAT-P-GAL4 driven reporter.

GlcAT-P is expressed in the larval brain lobes (A–G), the VNC (H–P) and peripheral nerves (Q–S) in the L3 larva brain. lacZ reporter expression in the brain lobes (red, A) colabeled with α-Repo (green, B). (C) Merged frames showing that GlcAT-P is expressed in a subset of Repo-positive glial cells (yellow; arrows). lacZ reporter expression in the mushroom bodies (red, D) colabeled with the neuronal marker Elav (green, E). Merged frame (F) showing co-staining of GlcAT-P and Elav in Kenyon cells (yellow; arrows). (G) Membrane targeted reporter (UAS-mCD8-mCherry) reveals expression of GlcAT-P in Kenyon cell neurites. lacZ reporter expression (H, K) in the larval VNC double labeled with α-Repo (I, J) or α-Elav (L, M). GlcAT-P is expressed in a subset of glial cells (yellow, arrows in J). GlcAT-P expression is also found in about two Elav positive neurons in ventral midline positions (yellow, arrows in M). (N–P) UAS-mCD8-mCherry reporter expression reveals that two cells (white arrow in N) bifurcate (arrowheads) and extend motor axons (blue arrows) bilaterally into the periphery. (P). GlcAT-P>lacZ reporter expression (Q) in cells on peripheral nerves are shown. These cells are peripheral glia as they colabel with Repo (R; yellow and arrows in S). A–F, H–J and K–M show individual frames of 1 µm thickness. G and N are maximum projections of Z-stacks. Bars in A, S: 50 µm. Bars in F, G: 10 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g002

In brv mutants the VNC is elongated during larval development

To determine when the VNC elongation occurs developmentally, we examined central nervous system development during embryogenesis and larval stages in brv mutants in the background of elav-mCD8-GFP transgenic flies [48]. During late embryogenesis (stage 17), elongation of the VNC could not be detected in maternal and zygotic brv mutants (Figure 3A–D). However, in brv mutant L1 larvae, an abnormally extended VNC was readily detectable (n = 7; Figure 3E–H). As larval development progressed to L2 (n = 7; Figure 3I–L) and L3 (n = 7; Figure 3M–P), the elongation of the VNC became more pronounced. We thus conclude that VNC elongation in brv mutants does not take place during embryonic development, but starts during early larval development and progresses through L2 and L3 larval stages.

thumbnail
Figure 3. The VNC in brv mutants elongates during larval development and can be rescued by ectopic GlcAT-P expression.

An Elav-mCD8-GFP background is used to visualize the outlines of the VNC. (A–C) Representative images of stage 17 embryos. (A) Wild-type (brv+) and (B) brv1 maternal and zygotic mutant. The progressive elongation of the VNC during larval development is shown in L1 (E–G), L2 (I–K) and L3 (M–O). Larval brains from wild-type (E, I, M), brv1 (F, J, N) and specimen over-expressing GlcAT-P (C, G, K, O) in brv1 mutant background are shown. (D, H, L, P) Quantification of the length of the VNC (n = 7, for each stage) is presented (* refers to CH322-82E19 rescued specimen. Double-sided arrows indicate the length of the VNC. L1, 2, 3 refers to larval stages 1, 2, and 3. Bars: 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g003

To test if the sequence as well as the size of metameric units in the L3 VNC were affected in brv mutants, we analyzed the expression profile of the homeotic genes Antp, Ubx, abdA and abdB, which have been described to label parasegments PS3–PS5, PS5–PS6, PS7–PS12 and PS13–PS14, respectively [49]. Our results showed that all the parasegments in the brv mutants were present and in the correct sequence (Figure 4) suggesting that the homeotic identity of the parasegments as well as their sequence was correctly specified in the larval VNC of brv mutants. We checked the intactness of the VNC in brv mutant larvae by analyzing anti-Futsch/22C10, anti-BP102, anti-Fas2, anti-Elav and anti-Repo stainings (Figure S4). We did not find any major changes in the expression pattern of these genes and we concluded that the structural integrity of the VNC was not grossly affected in brv mutants.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Parasegmental identity and sequence of homeotic gene expression domains are not altered in brv mutants.

L3 larva brains from brv+ (A–D) and brv1 mutants (E–H) were immunostained with anti-Antp (A, E), anti-Ubx (B, F), anti-AbdA (C, G), and anti-AbdB (D, H). (I–L) Histograms comparing the average lengths of the homeotic expression domains (I: Antp; J: Ubx; K: AbdA; L: AbdB) are shown. Dashed lines indicate parasegmental (PS) boundaries. Bar: 20 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g004

We also checked the integrity of mushroom body neurons and VUM neurons in brv mutant larval brains by labeling them with UAS-mCD8-GFP using GAL4-OK107 [50] and 807-GAL4 (A. Brand, unpublished), respectively. The brv mutation did not affect the viability of these neurons, but a displacement of their cell bodies and neurites along the longitudinal axis was observed (Figure S5) possibly as a consequence of the elongation of the nervous system along the anterior-posterior axis.

Neuroblast proliferation is normal in brv mutants

To examine whether the extension of the VNC could be due to additional cells, we studied neuroblast (NB) proliferation in brv mutants. We firstly analyzed the number of proliferating cells in thoracic and abdominal segments of brv mutant VNCs during L3 larvae by anti-Miranda staining. Miranda (Mira) labels dividing NBs and ganglion mother cells (GMCs). We could not detect any significant difference in the number of proliferating Mira positive cells in brv mutant versus wild-type larval brains (n = 6; Figure 5A–C). We also analyzed neuroblast lineages in the larval VNC of L3 brv mutants using anti-Neurotactin (Nrt) immunohistochemistry. In L3 larva, Nrt labels active NBs and their larval-specific secondary neurons [51]. Extra Nrt positive cells indicative of extra proliferation could not be detected in thoracic segments (Figure 5D–F) or in abdominal segments (Figure 5G–I) of the VNC. For example, in wild-type VNCs, only 3 NBs per hemisegment are mitotically active during L3 stages producing small lineages that contain 4 to 12 Nrt positive cells [52]. Both the number of Nrt labeled NB lineages and the number of cells within these lineages was comparable between wild-type and brv mutant abdominal neuromeres (Figure 5G, H–I). However, as a consequence of the VNC extension, the spacing between the abdominal Nrt positive lineages was increased in brv mutant larvae (Figure 5H, I). In the thoracic segments, the extension resulted in a misplacement of NB lineages towards the midline of the VNC, a domain reserved to the neuropile in wild-type brains. In summary, we present evidence that the elongation of the VNC in brv mutant larvae is not due to extra cell proliferation of larval NBs.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Larval VNC extension is not a consequence of extra larval NB and GMC proliferation.

(A–C) Comparison of progenitor cells (neuroblasts and GMCs) in the Antp expressing domain (anti-Antp staining not shown) of (A) brv+ and (B) brv1 mutants using anti-Mira. (C) Quantification of Mira positive cells in brv+ and brv1. (D–I) anti- Nrt staining in thoracic (D–F) and abdominal neuromeres (G–I) of L3 larva brains in brv+ (D, G) and brv1 mutants (E, F, H,I). A1–A9: abdominal neuromeres 1 to 9. Arrowheads in H point to the 3 Nrt positive NB lineages in A3. A–B and D–I represent maximum projections of Z-stacks. Bar: 20 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g005

Peripheral nerves are shorter in brv mutant larvae

Since GlcAT-P-GAL4 reporter gene expression was found in the peripheral nerves and in the VUM motoneurons whose axons project through the peripheral nerves towards their peripheral muscle targets (Figure 2K, N, Q), we investigated whether the length of these peripheral nerve fibers was affected in brv mutant larvae. Using Nervana2-GAL4 (Nrv2-GAL4); UAS-GFP transgenic flies [53], we measured the length of the longest nerve fibers emanating from the most posterior end of the VNC in brv mutants and compared it to wild-type. A substantial difference in the length of the peripheral nerves was already detectable during L1 stages but not at stage 17 embryos (data not shown) and the difference was more evident in L2 and L3 larva (Figure 6A–I). We found that nerve fibers in brv mutants were considerably shorter (wild-type: 750+/- 36 µm; brv mutants: 508+/- 40 µm, n = 7 for each) (Figure 6C, F, I) at L3 stage. The data demonstrated that consistently peripheral nerves were shorter by about one third in brv as compared to wt. As a consequence of the nerve fibers being shorter, they also contained less total peripheral glia as compared to wild-type, although the spacing and the distribution of peripheral nerve glia on a similar long stretch of the nerve fibers did not seem to be affected (Figure S6).

thumbnail
Figure 6. brv mutant larvae display shorter peripheral nerves.

Representative pictures of L1, L2 and L3 larval brains from brv+ (A, B, C) and brv1 mutants (D, E, F) expressing Nrv2-GAL4;UAS-GFP(S65T) to visualize the peripheral nerves. White arrowheads indicate the most posterior projecting and longest peripheral nerves used for these measurements. Histograms (G, H, I) compare the average lengths of the longest peripheral nerves during L1 (G), L2 (H) and L3 (I) larva between wild-type and brv1 mutants. The peripheral nerves are significantly shorter in brv1 mutants (*: p<0.0001). (J–S) Representative frames, taken from time-lapse recordings of wandering larva expressing Nrv2-GAL4; UAS-GFP(S65T), display the VNC during one full cycle of a larval contraction and expansion during locomotion. A brv+ (J–N) and brv1 larva (O–S) is shown. Ripples (arrowheads in P, Q), indicative for relaxation from tension, were detected only in VNC of brv1 mutants but not in brv+ (J–N). Bar: 100 µm. A time line (in sec) is shown below panels J–S.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g006

Shorter peripheral nerves could either be causative for the extension of the VNC or, alternatively, a consequence of the elongated VNC. To resolve this issue, time lapse recordings of wandering L3 wild-type and brv mutant larvae were performed. In wild-type larvae, the brain and VNC as well as the peripheral nerves were rapidly stretched and relaxed as the larvae moved (Figure 6J–N; see also [53]). However, stretching and compression was more evident in brv mutant larvae, in which the VNC contracted more strongly and developed ripples as the larvae constricted (arrowheads in Figure 6O–S). This suggested that the larval VNC was under higher tension in brv mutants. To further investigate whether the VNC is indeed under tension of shorter peripheral nerves, we made use of elav-mCD8-GFP transgenic flies [48] and observed the VNC in real time in wild-type and brv mutant L2 larvae. Larvae were cold-immobilized and a cut was made at the posterior end. This cut severed the connections between the most posterior peripheral nerve fibers and their respective body wall contacts and as a consequence any tension of the most posterior nerves on the VNC would be released. We observed that after this cutting procedure the VNC immediately retracted in brv mutants (n = 10; Figure 7C, D), whereas there were no detectable changes in wild-type larvae (n = 10; Figure 7A, B). VNC retraction could not be seen in brv mutant L3 larvae after an identical procedure, possibly because during L3 larval stages the VNC is too deformed to return to its original length. To further resolve if VNC elongation is the cause or the consequence of shorter peripheral nerves, we made use of the Tubby (Tb) mutant. Tb larvae are considerably shorter along the anterior-posterior axis than wild-type larvae [13]. Although the length of the Tb VNC was comparable to wild-type (Figure 7G, I), peripheral nerves were shorter in Tb larvae (Figure 7G,J). However, when we compared VNC extension in brv-/- and in brv-/-; Tb-/+ mutant L3 larvae, we found that in brv-/-; Tb+/- mutants the VNC was also extended but significantly lesser as compared to brv-/- mutants alone (Figure 7E–I). This experiment demonstrated that the extension of the VNC in brv mutants correlates with the total length of the larva. Since the peripheral nerves and the tracheal system are the only physical connections between the larval body wall and the CNS, our results suggested that in brv mutants the VNC expands as a consequence of increased tension from shorter peripheral nerves or trachea possibly due to some growth retardation of larval peripheral nerves or trachea.

thumbnail
Figure 7. In brv mutant larvae the VNC appears to be under tension of peripheral nerves.

Representative pictures of L2 larvae from brv+ (A, B) and brv1 mutants (C, D) expressing Elav-mCD8-GFP before (A, C) and after (B, D) dislodging the connections of the posterior most peripheral nerves. Arrowhead in (D) points towards a kink that appeared during relaxation of the VNC in brv1 mutants. Representative pictures from brv+ (E), brv1-/- (F), Tb1-/+ (G) and brv1-/-, Tb1-/+ mutant (H) L3 larvae expressing Nrv2-GAL4;UAS-GFP(S65T). The e\tension of the VNC in brv1-/-, Tb1-/+ is reduced as compared to brv1-/-. Histograms (I, J) quantify the average lengths of VNCs and posterior-most peripheral nerves. brv1-/-, Tb1-/+ VNCs are significantly shorter as compared to brv1-/- mutants (*: p = 0.0005). White arrowheads indicate the posterior tip of the VNC. Bars: 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g007

GlcAT-P function is required in hemocytes

To test for the cell specific requirement of GlcAT-P, rescue experiments with ubiquitous (Act5C-GAL4) as well as cell specific GAL4 drivers for the tracheal system (btl-GAL4), neuronal (Elav-GAL4) and glial cells (gcm-GAL4 and repo-GAL4) were performed. We were unable to rescue brv mutants with the btl-GAL4 tracheal driver ruling out any involvement of the tracheal system at least in the VNC extension phenotype. We also could not rescue brv mutants with the pan-neuronal driver Elav-GAL4 demonstrating that expression of GlcAT-P in neurons is not sufficient to rescue the VNC extension phenotype. However, ubiquitous expression by Act5C-GAL4 completely rescued the phenotype (Figure S7; n = 50) showing that the VNC extension in brv mutants is a specific consequence of loss of GlcAT-P function. Furthermore, the catalytically dead version of GlcAT-P (GlcAT-Pcd) driven by Act5C-GAL4 failed to rescue demonstrating that impairment of GlcAT-P catalytic activity is sufficient for the brv mutant phenotype. GlcAT-P driven by the pan-glial and hemocyte driver gcm-GAL4 fully rescued the extended VNC phenotype as well as the pupal lethality (Figure S7; n = 50). However, another pan-glial driver, repo-GAL4, was not able to rescue the brv mutant phenotype (Figure S7; n = 50). Most importantly, the brv mutant phenotype was completely rescued (Figure S7; n = 50) when GlcAT-P was driven by the hemocyte specific driver, crq-GAL4. The rescue experiments identified a critical role for GlcAT-P in hemocytes.

repo is a genetic modifier of GlcAT-P

In an attempt to identify interactors with GlcAT-P, we tested a possible genetic interaction with the glial specific repo gene. Our first observation that repo and GlcAT-P interacted came from our rescue experiments when we observed enhanced elongation of the VNC in the presence of one chromosome carrying the lethal repo-GAL4 (henceforth referred to as repo) insertion in the background of brv1-/- larvae (Figure S7). The length of the extended VNC in brv1-/-, repo-/+ L3 larvae was 560.8+/- 44.8 µm as compared to 382.8+/- 54.8 µm in brv1-/- mutant larvae (Figure 8A–C, E; n = 7 for each). This difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Correspondingly, the posterior-most peripheral nerves shortened from 508.6+/- 40.7 µm in L3 brv1-/- mutant larvae to 283.3+/- 48.8 µm in brv1-/-, repo-/+ larvae (Figure 8A–C, F; n = 7 for each). The shortening of peripheral nerves is statistically significant (p<0.0001). Furthermore, rare brv1-/-, repo-/- L2 escapers showed an even more severe extension of the VNC as compared to brv-/- L2 larvae and a similar extension as brv-/-, repo-/+ L3 larvae (Figure 8D, E). The increase in brv1-/-, repo-/- L2 larvae was also significant (p<0.0001) compared to L2 brv-/- larvae. It is worth noting that the VNC of brv1-/-, repo -/- L2 larvae almost spanned the entire length of the larva (Figure 8E; see also Figure 3L), a situation similar to late embryos where the VNC extends to the most posterior end of the embryo. Interestingly, the peripheral nerves were also severely shorter in L2 larvae suggesting that growth of peripheral nerves came to an almost complete halt in brv1-/-, repo-/- double mutants (Figure 8F). These results strongly support the notion that hemocytes as well as glial cells are synergistically required for the growth of integrated peripheral nerves during larval development.

thumbnail
Figure 8. repo interacts genetically with GlcAT-P.

Representative pictures from brv+ (A), brv1 (B), repo-/+, brv1-/- L3 (C) and repo-/-, brv1-/- L2 larvae. The CNS is visualized either by Nrv2-GAL4;UAS-GFP(S65T) (A, B) or by repo-GAL4;UAS-GFP(S65T) (C–D). White arrowheads indicate the tip of the VNC. (E, F) Histograms compare the average lengths of VNCs (E) and the most posterior peripheral nerves (F) for L3 as well as L2 larvae. repo-/+, brv1-/- VNCs are significantly longer as compared to brv1-/- mutants (*: p<0.0001). Bar: 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.g008

Taken together, our data demonstrate that VNC extension in brv mutants may be a result of increased tension exerted on the VNC as a consequence of impaired peripheral nerve extension/growth. In this context, GlcAT-P plays a crucial role in hemocytes which might control some aspect of glial cell biology implicated in the growth of integrated peripheral nerves. Further studies are required to address the exact molecular and cellular mechanisms of GlcAT-P function in hemocytes and glia.

Discussion

In this study, we have identified and characterized novel alleles of the glucuronyltransferase GlcAT-P, the Drosophila homolog of human B3GAT1. The loss of GlcAT-P function causes an extension of the VNC probably due to the inability of the peripheral nerve to stretch/grow in tandem with the growth of the larval body. We also showed that hemocytes are critically required for the extension of peripheral nerves during larval development but glia also plays an important role. Our findings suggest that GlcAT-P is involved in growth of integrated peripheral nerves during Drosophila larval growth.

GlcAT-P is expressed in the larval nervous system

Although we spent considerable effort to study GlcAT-P protein localization in larval brains, we were unsuccessful in detecting any relevant signal using an antibody raised against Drosophila GlcAT-P in tissue whole mounts although the antibodies worked on western blots and in an over/mis-expression paradigm. The fact that we could not detect GlcAT-P expression in specimen could be attributable to a low endogenous expression level of GlcAT-P or, alternatively, to steric hindrance of the antigenic epitope(s) due to the particular subcellular localization of the GlcAT-P protein or to its interaction with other proteins. However, a GlcAT-P-GAL4 line with an insertion into the GlcAT-P locus allowed us to study the embryonic and larval expression pattern of GlcAT-P. GlcAT-P-GAL4 driven LacZ reporter expression could not be detected in the hemocytes or embryonic CNS. But LacZ expression was clearly detected in a subset of neurons (Kenyon cells and VUM motoneurons) and glial cells in the larval CNS. The brv mutation neither impaired the viability of these neurons nor resulted in obvious developmental defects, apart from the longitudinal displacement of their cell bodies and neurites due to VNC elongation.

During Drosophila nervous system development, the VNC undergoes a process of condensation at late embryonic stages [54]. Recently, a mutation in the C1GalTA gene, which codes for a core 1 galactosyltransferase, has been isolated and its phenotype characterized as a defect in embryonic VNC condensation [55]. C1GalTA is one of the several C1GalTs genes involved in mucin-type O-glycosylation in Drosophila [55]. Interestingly, the C1GalTA mutant phenotype is almost indistinguishable from brv mutants with regard to the larval VNC extension. However, we have not detected embryonic VNC condensation defects in brv mutants. We attribute this difference to the expression of C1GalTA, but not GlcAT-P, in the embryonic CNS [55].

GlcAT-P controls the length of the VNC and the peripheral nerves

We observed a reverse correlation between the length of peripheral nerves and the extension of the VNC in brv mutants. It has been reported that tension on nerves during growth might stimulate the elongation of axons [5]. It is conceivable that if tension on nerves generated by the growing larval body cannot be counteracted by concomitant growth of the peripheral nerves, the VNC would be forced to compensate such tension by stretching, thus resulting in the VNC extension phenotype observed in brv mutants. Such notion is supported by the retraction of the VNC in brv mutant larvae after severing the very posterior segments. This procedure liberates the attachment of the most posterior peripheral nerves to the posterior segments of the larva and at least partially releases the tension on the nerves and the VNC. Thus, our data is consistent with the hypothesis that GlcAT-P plays a role in peripheral nerve growth during Drosophila larval development. Alternatively, GlcAT-P might be required in the VNC during larval stages to keep the VNC compacted. However, our finding that the VNC extension is significantly reduced in brv-/-, Tb+/- mutants as compared to brv-/- mutants indicates that the VNC is not undergoing an active extension in brv mutants and that the elongation is clearly dependent on the total length of the larval body. This observation suggests that GlcAT-P is not required for VNC compaction since the VNC should have been elongated to a similar extent in the Tb+/- background if GlcAT-P would function in VNC compaction. Nevertheless, it cannot be completely ruled out that brv mutation causes enhanced VNC elasticity due to changes in the ECM deposited into the VNC by hemocytes and maybe glia. As a consequence of reduced VNC rigidity and its extension, the peripheral nerves do not bear significant strain and hence are not induced to grow. It is also feasible that both a defect in peripheral nerve growth as well as in the elasticity of the VNC contribute to the extension of the VNC. However, even in the context of the alternative explanation it is still obvious that the final consequence is that peripheral nerves in brv mutants do not elongate as much as they would in the wild type (wt). During larval growth the terminals of axons in the peripheral nerves progressively move away from the nervous system predominantly as a consequence of the extension of the larva along the anterior-posterior body axis. During wt larvae growth the length of the VNC does not elongate much whereas the peripheral nerves increase quite dramatically in length. This reveals a mechanism which promotes extension of integrated peripheral axons during larval growth. In contrast, in brv mutants a significant reduction of the length of peripheral nerves is observed and we suggest that due to the reduced growth of peripheral nerves the VNC compensates the resulting tension by elongating. Taken together, we conclude that GlcAT-P controls the elongation of peripheral nerves/axons either indirectly via regulating the compaction of the VNC or by directly regulating the growth of peripheral nerves and the axons therein.

It is worthwhile to note that most organisms with a nervous system exhibit elongation of the anterior posterior body axis during development which normally goes beyond the growth of the nervous system along the same axis. The contacts between e.g. centrally located motoneurons and their peripheral muscles are generally established before such extensive growth phases. A mechanism of “stretch growth of integrated axon tracts” [5] has been postulated to allow peripheral nerves and the integrated axons in these nerves to grow in order to compensate for possible tension arising from the growth process of the organism on the central nervous system. Although such stretch growth of integrated axon tracts seems to be fundamental to all growing organisms, almost nothing is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms driving this process. Our data suggests that GlcAT-P is involved in this mechanism as in the absence of GlcAT-P function peripheral nerve growth is severely retarded.

GlcAT-P may regulate growth of integrated nerves via glia and hemocytes

We also have demonstrated that GlcAT-P function is important in hemocytes since targeted expression of GlcAT-P in hemocytes fully rescued the VNC extension as well as pupal lethality whereas neither expression in neurons nor in glia could rescue. Hemocytes are known as versatile cells involved in immune response as well as in immune system unrelated developmental mechanisms [32]. Interestingly, hemocytes have been shown to be required for brain morphogenesis particularly in the process of embryonic VNC condensation [54]. The onset of VNC condensation coincides with the deposition of Collagen IV by hemocytes and a lack of hemocyte migration is associated with a severe reduction in ECM components [54] demonstrating that one major function of hemocytes is ECM deposition. This is further supported by findings that hemocytes express several ECM components such as Peroxidisan, dSPARC, and the proteoglycan MDP; also it has been shown that hemocytes produce structural components of the basement membrane such as laminin A and collagen IV [56], [57]. GlcAT-P could have a role in modifying ECM components produced in hemocytes by adding sugar residues to such proteins which in turn might influence cells directly exposed to such modified ECM.

We have also shown that partial or complete loss of repo function in brv mutant background results in further and progressive extension of the VNC depending on the repo gene dose. These observations clearly reveal that although GlcAT-P function is required in hemocytes, the phenotypic manifestation of VNC extension in brv mutants also involves functional glial cells. repo affects glia differentiation as well as maintenance of glial function [58], [59], [60]. Our finding indicates that if the population of glial cells is genetically weakened by reducing or removing Repo function in a brv-/- mutant background, the VNC extension phenotype is enhanced. Strikingly, in specimen double mutant for brv and repo, the extended VNC stretches along the entire body axis of the larva. This is comparable to the VNC extension in late embryos suggesting that in brv-/-, repo-/- double mutants, the growth of peripheral nerves is almost completely abolished thus leading to the extreme extension of the VNC during larval growth. Furthermore, the genetic interaction between brv and repo establishes an important role for glia in stretch growth of peripheral nerves and/or VNC elasticity. Interestingly, the peripheral nerves are covered by a thick layer of ECM [61]. As such, the ECM might be an important provider of contextual information for peripheral glia as well as neurites projecting through the nerves.

Some peripheral glial cells also express GlcAT-P which might suggest that glial cells are also involved in either generating their own matrix environment or directly control neurite extension. However, expression of GlcAT-P specifically in glial cells did not rescue the brv mutant phenotype and as such GlcAT-P function in glia is not critical for peripheral nerve growth. Thus, we hypothesize that GlcAT-P has a role in regulating the elongation of integrated nerves and peripheral axons during development via hemocytes and glia possibly by glycosylating and depositing ECM related proteins. GlcAT-P which is mainly expressed in the brain in vertebrates [30] has been shown to be involved in the biosynthesis of the HNK-1 epitope [26] on integral membrane glycoproteins such as the neural cell adhesion molecule [62], myelin-associated glycoprotein [63], L1 [62], transiently expressed axonal glycoprotein-1 [64], P0 [65] and Ependymin [66]. In addition, some proteoglycans and glycolipids are also known to bear the HNK-1 epitope [20], and in mice, the HNK-1 epitope is selectively found on myelinating Schwann cells associated with motor axons [19]. In GlcAT-P/b3gat1 knock-out mice, an almost complete loss of the HNK-1 epitope in the brain is observed [35]. In our analysis the HNK-1 epitope was still detected in immunoblots of brv mutant larval CNS, suggesting that in the fly, GlcAT-P is not required or is redundant for the generation of the HNK-1 epitope. Indeed, GlcAT-S has been shown to be involved in HNK-1 epitope synthesis as well [24] and we have demonstrated that GlcAT-S protein is present in the fly larval-CNS. Therefore, in Drosophila at least a partial redundancy between GlcAT-P and GlcAT-S might explain the overall presence of the HNK-1 epitope. It is worth noting that despite the apparent lack of changes in global levels of the HNK-1 epitope, the VNC extension phenotype was still completely penetrant in brv mutant larvae. Hence, the extended VNC phenotype in brv mutant larvae could be independent of the HNK-1 epitope. This is also supported by the similarity to the phenotype of C1GalTA which might indicate that GlcAT-P, like C1GalTA, is also involved in generation of glucuronylated core 1 O-glycans [67], [68]. Alternatively, our analysis of HNK-1 expression levels might have overlooked a specific HNK-1 carrying protein responsible for the VNC extension phenotype, and as such VNC extension could still be a result of a specific, yet unknown, protein lacking the HNK-1 epitope as a consequence of the loss of GlcAT-P activity. All three brv alleles identified in the EMS screen affected the C-terminal catalytic domain of GlcAT-P and ectopic expression the GlcAT-Pcd was not able to rescue brv mutants. We conclude that loss of catalytic GlcAT-P activity is sufficient to result in a functional null mutation and the catalytic activity of GlcAT-P is crucial for peripheral nerve growth.

Interestingly, one of the currently identified GlcAT-P protein targets in vertebrates is the HNK-1 epitope carrying ECM glycoprotein tenascin-C [67]. Ten-C is found in glial cells and potentially promotes or inhibits neurite outgrowth in a context dependant manner [69], [70]. Glial cells and neurons/axons are also known to interact with each other [71] by glia supporting axonal functions e.g., by neurotrophic and metabolic support [72] as well as by providing the extracellular matrix context [69], [70]. Based on these reports and our own observations, we suggest a model in which GlcAT-P is critical in hemocytes possibly to deposit specific ECM on peripheral nerves. The ECM then in turn is critical to peripheral glia for stretch growth of the peripheral nerves for example by directly or indirectly being involved in the incorporation of new membrane material to growing axons thereby facilitating stretch growth of integrated axons during larval growth. It has been shown that ECM is more than a mere structural support to cells and instead is involved in signaling on the molecular level via ECM receptors such as integrins, dystroglycans, membrane associated heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs), glycipicans and syndecans [73], [74], [75]. For example, integrins are crucial components of cell adhesion and together with other ECM receptors can signal to the cytoskeleton of cells leading to cell shape changes, regulation of cell proliferation, cell migration, apoptosis and differentiation. Furthermore, a clear link between ECM and axonal growth and growth cone pathfinding has been established [73]. In this context the ECM has been shown to regulate actomyosin contractility, actin polymerization and actin stabilization and therefore might impact on the cytoskeleton of signaling receiving cells via Src, FAK, Rac1, RhoA and Rock leading to modified growth cone pathfinding [76], [77]. Therefore, it is possible that in the context of the extended ventral nerve cord and the shorter peripheral nerves in GlcAT-P mutant larvae altered ECM deposited by GlcAT-P deficient hemocytes and glia might lead to profound changes in the ECM to cell signaling resulting in the observed peripheral nerve growth phenotype. It is conceivable that ECM related mechanisms contributing to early growth cone pathfinding are also involved in growth of axons after the growth cones reached their final target sites. However, currently the precise molecular and cellular mechanisms how GlcAT-P affects axonal extension of integrated axons in Drosophila peripheral nerves are unknown and need further investigations.

Alternatively, GlcAT-P could play a role in glial proliferation or migration. This finds some support by the observation that at least the peripheral nerves had less total glia although spacing and distribution of glial cells along the nerves seemed to be unperturbed. The limited reduced number of peripheral glia could then hamper the extension of peripheral nerves and thus limit the elongation of peripheral axons. However, we did not observe a general reduction of glial cells in brv mutants making a general role of GlcAT-P in glial proliferation relatively unlikely.

In summary, we have isolated novel alleles of the Drosophila homolog of the mammalian glucuronyltransferase b3gat1, GlcAT-P. Functional analysis suggests that GlcAT-P is required in hemocytes for the growth of peripheral nerves during development in which glial cells also play a major role. The postembryonic growth of organisms requires the continuous elongation of integrated peripheral nerves and axons to accommodate for the extension of the body axes during development. To our knowledge, GlcAT-P is the first gene with a possible link to nerve stretch growth. We propose that the developing Drosophila larval nervous system and the GlcAT-P mutants characterized here will be helpful in deciphering the basic cellular and molecular mechanisms of nerve stretch growth in the future. Currently, the major challenge is the identification of potential GlcAT-P targets either via biochemical or genetic screens and the characterization of their functional involvement. Given the high degree of functional conservation of molecular and biochemical pathways between insects and vertebrates, performing further mechanistic studies on GlcAT-P in Drosophila most likely will deliver new insights into the roles of glucuronyltransferases in brain development and function.

Materials and Methods

Fly stocks

w*; DDC-GAL4 [38] and w*; UAS-GFPS65T were meiotically recombined on the third chromosome. For the EMS mutagenesis screen w*; DDC-GAL4, UAS-GFPS65T males were fed with 25 mM EMS according to standard procedures. Following this, they were mated with w*; Dr1/TM6b, Dfd-GMR-nv-YFP, Sb1, Tb1 virgin females. Single males from the progeny were then mated with w*; Dr1/TM6b, Dfd-GMR-nv-YFP, Sb1, Tb1 virgin females to propagate the mutagenized third chromosome. Finally, w*; DDC-GAL4, UAS-GFPS65T #/Dr1/TM6b, Dfd-GMR-nv-YFP, Sb1, Tb1 males and female virgins were mated together to establish the stocks (# denotes mutagenized chromosome). DDC-GAL4, UAS-GFPS65T was meiotically recombined out of brv1, brv2 and brv3 mutant background.

The following fly strains were also used: elav-mCD8-GFP [48], FRT2A, UAS-mCD8-GFP, dppblink-GAL4 [78], Sqh::EYFP-Golgi [43], UAS-nβgal, hs-Flp, P{GawB}eyOK107, PBac{GAL4D, EYFP}GlcAT-PPL00294 (used at GlcAT-P-GAL4), PBac{PB}CG14142c00688, PBac{PB}c01618, 807-GAL4 (A Brand, unpublished) and Tb1. Fly stocks without reference are described in flybase. Unless otherwise specified, all the mutant analysis was done in brv1 mutant allele. GlcAT-P cDNA was amplified from DGRC plasmid LD40245 by PCR using the oligos RP1 (AATTGCGGCCGCTTGGTTCGTCACAATTTTTTATA) and RP2 (AATTGGTACCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGGAAAATG). Catalytically dead GlcAT-P was generated by mutating Asp333 to Ala by PCR. For making respective UAS-GlcAT-P lines, the PCR products were cloned into the NotI-KpnI cleaved transformation vector pUAST-attB.

Mapping the EMS lesions

RNA was extracted from homozygous brv mutant larvae using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen). cDNAs derived from the 10 genes in the mapped region were synthesized using standard protocols (Invitrogen) and sequenced for all the three alleles.

Rescue constructs and EGFP tagging by recombineering

The following construct from P[acman] resource (see http://flypush.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu/pacmanfly) was used for rescue experiments: CH322-82E19 (contains GlcAT-P without the first two exons). N or C terminus of GlcAT-P was tagged to EGFP in CH322-82E19 and CH321-38B20 (contains entire GlcAT-P and some other genes) BACs from P[acman] resource. We used Addgene plasmids 19173 and 19178 for EGFP-tagging by recombineering [45]. All germ line transformants were generated by Bestgene Inc, CA.

Antibody generation

Polyclonal antibodies were generated against peptides C-RTRYKNTNLEHIDRLLVRP and C-EGRNALISKNGRENPHSK for GlcAT-P and GlcAT-S respectively (Genzym Antibodies).

Immunoblotting

Third instar larvae or their brains were used for extract preparation. Protein extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblots were probed with anti-HNK-1 (1∶1000), rabbit anti-GlcAT-P (1∶1000), rabbit anti-GlcAT-S (1∶1000) and mouse anti-α-tubulin (1∶10000, Sigma) using PVDF membranes (Perkin Elmer) and Supersignal-detection kit (Thermo Scientific).

Immunohistochemistry

The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-elav (1∶20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB)), mouse anti-repo (1∶5, DSHB), mouse anti-antp (1∶20, DSHB), mouse anti-AbdB (1∶10, DSHB), mouse anti-Ubx (1∶20, kindly provided by R White), rat anti-AbdA (1∶200, kindly provided by J Casanova), mouse anti-HNK-1 (1∶1000, kindly provided by S Oka), rabbit anti-Mira (1∶5000, kindly provided by F Matsuzaki). In addition, secondary goat antibodies conjugated to Alexa488 (Molecular Probes), Cy3 or Cy5 (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories) were applied. Images were acquired with an Upright Olympus FV-1000 Confocal Imaging system using FV10-ASW software.

For releasing the connections of the posterior peripheral nerves with the larval muscles, the appropriately staged wild-type and brv mutant larvae carrying elav-mCD-GFP were first cold-immobilized. An image was captured using Leica MZ16F stereomicroscope before and after the posterior-most nerve connections were separated by making a minute cut in the posterior part of the larvae.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Molecular characterization of brv1, brv2 and brv3 alleles. Partial alignments of the cDNA (A, C, D) and genomic DNA (B) sequences from brv+, brv1, brv2, and brv3 alleles are presented. The 14 bp long deletion in the brv1 cDNA (boxed) is a consequence of a G to A mutation in the splice acceptor (black box) and the use of a cryptic alternative splice acceptor (red box). A G to A mutation transforms a Trp codon (TGG) to a Stop codon (TAG) (C, boxed) in brv2. A T to A transversion changes the conserved, non-polar, Leu residue (CTG) into the polar Gln amino acid (CAG) (D, boxed) in brv3. (E) Partial alignment of several GlcAT-P orthologs shows that the brv3 mutation affects an evolutionarily conserved hydrophobic residue (boxed).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

(A) Protein preparations from brv+ and Df(3L)GlcAT-P brains were blotted with anti-HNK-1 (HNK-1) and anti-GlcAT-S (GlcAT-S) antibodies. (B–C) Misexpression of UAS-GlcAT-P in L3 larva wing imaginal discs with Dppblink-GAL4. (B) Ectopic expression of GlcAT-P is detected by α-GlcAT-P immunohistochemistry in the typical pattern of dpp expression domain. The white box indicates the region shown in (C). (C) Co-labeling (arrows) of α-GlcAT-P (red) with Sqh::EYFP-Golgi (green) reveals that GlcAT-P protein is localized to the Golgi apparatus. Bars in B and C are 100 µm and 20 µm respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

GlcAT-P-GAL4 driven expression of a reporter gene (nuclear β-Gal) recapitulates aspects of endogenous GlcAT-P expression during embryogenesis. (A, B) Note that reporter gene expression mimics the described GlcAT-P in situ hybridization expression pattern (see BDGP;http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/bquery.pl?qtype=report&find=CG6207&searchfield=CG). LacZ expression was detected in the amnioserosa (A; arrows) of stage 14 embryos, and in salivary glands (B; arrowheads) and the gut (arrows) at stage 17. Bar: 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

The general structure the VNC is unaffected in brv mutant larvae. Labeling of L3 larva brains from wild-type (brv+) and brv1 with anti-22C10 (A, B), anti-BP102 (C, D), anti-Fas2 (E, F), anti-Elav (G, H) and anti-Repo (I, J) shows apparently normal VNC structure in brv mutants. Bar: 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Mushroom body neurons and VUM motoneurons are apparently normal in brv mutants. (A, B) OK107-GAL4>UAS-mCD8-GFP did not display any apparent defects in mushroom bodies in L3 brains. Arrowheads point to the MB neurons. (C, D) 807-GAL4>UAS-mCD8-GFP showed that VUM neurons were present in brv1 mutants (arrowheads). Two consecutive abdominal neuromeres (dashed lines) are shown. A–D represent maximum projections of Z-stacks. Bar: 20 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s005

(TIF)

Figure S6.

Peripheral glia spacing and distribution is not affected in brv mutant larvae. (A) Labeling of L3 larva brains from brv+ and brv1 mutants with anti-Repo antibody shows a similar spacing between glia in the peripheral nerves. (B) Nrv2-GAL4>GFP expression in L3 larva brains from wild-type (brv+) and brv1 mutants. (C) Merged frames of anti-Repo (red) and Nrv2-GAL4>GFP (green). (D) Histograms depicting the average number of glial cells in comparable stretches of the most posterior peripheral nerves of brv+ and brv1 (n = 30 for each) larvae. Bar: 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s006

(TIF)

Figure S7.

Rescue of brv mutants by expression of GlcAT-P using UAS/GAL4 system. Quantification of the length of the L3 VNCs (A) and peripheral nerves (B) in different rescue experiment settings is provided (*: p<0.0001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028106.s007

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank R. White, J. Casanova, F. Matsuzaki and S. Oka for antibodies and S. Luschnig for flies. The Elav, Repo, Nrt, Antp and AbdB monoclonal antibodies developed by G.M. Rubin, C. Goodman, D. Brower and S. Celniker, respectively, were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA 52242. The Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center resources contributed to this work and FlyBase provided important information used in this work. We are grateful to C. Lehner, X.H. Yang, B. Reversade and B. Knowles for critical comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RP JB GU. Performed the experiments: RP JB. Analyzed the data: RP JB GU. Wrote the paper: RP JB GU.

References

  1. 1. Geraldo S, Gordon-Weeks PR (2009) Cytoskeletal dynamics in growth-cone steering. J Cell Sci 122: 3595–3604.
  2. 2. Dickson BJ (2002) Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 298: 1959–1964.
  3. 3. Dent EW, Gertler FB (2003) Cytoskeletal dynamics and transport in growth cone motility and axon guidance. Neuron 40: 209–227.
  4. 4. Weiss P (1941) Nerve patterns: the mechanics of nerve growth. Growth, Third Growth Symposium. pp. pp. 163–203.
  5. 5. Smith DH (2009) Stretch growth of integrated axon tracts: extremes and exploitations. Prog Neurobiol 89: 231–239.
  6. 6. Dagg AI, Foster JB (1982) The giraffe.Its biology, behavior and ecology. Malabar:. FL: Kreiger.
  7. 7. Bannister JL, Kemper CM, Warneke RM (1996) The action plan for Australian cetaceans. In: Agency ANC, editor. Canberra, Australia.
  8. 8. Lamoureux P, Heidemann SR, Martzke NR, Miller KE (2010) Growth and elongation within and along the axon. Dev Neurobiol 70: 135–149.
  9. 9. Loverde JR, Ozoka VC, Aquino R, Lin L, Pfister BJ (2011) Live Imaging of Axon Stretch Growth in Embryonic and Adult Neurons. J Neurotrauma.
  10. 10. Chetta J, Kye C, Shah SB (2010) Cytoskeletal dynamics in response to tensile loading of mammalian axons. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 67: 650–665.
  11. 11. Bernal R, Pullarkat PA, Melo F (2007) Mechanical properties of axons. Phys Rev Lett 99: 018301.
  12. 12. Miller KE, Sheetz MP (2006) Direct evidence for coherent low velocity axonal transport of mitochondria. J Cell Biol 173: 373–381.
  13. 13. Schaefer AW, Schoonderwoert VT, Ji L, Mederios N, Danuser G, et al. (2008) Coordination of actin filament and microtubule dynamics during neurite outgrowth. Dev Cell 15: 146–162.
  14. 14. Lee AC, Suter DM (2008) Quantitative analysis of microtubule dynamics during adhesion-mediated growth cone guidance. Dev Neurobiol 68: 1363–1377.
  15. 15. Chang S, Rodionov VI, Borisy GG, Popov SV (1998) Transport and turnover of microtubules in frog neurons depend on the pattern of axonal growth. J Neurosci 18: 821–829.
  16. 16. Suter DM, Miller KE (2011) The emerging role of forces in axonal elongation. Prog Neurobiol 94: 91–101.
  17. 17. Venken KJ, Bellen HJ (2005) Emerging technologies for gene manipulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Rev Genet 6: 167–178.
  18. 18. Schafer MK, Altevogt P (2010) L1CAM malfunction in the nervous system and human carcinomas. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 2425–2437.
  19. 19. Kleene R, Schachner M (2004) Glycans and neural cell interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 195–208.
  20. 20. Uusitalo M, Kivela T (2001) The HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope in the eye: basic science and functional implications. Prog Retin Eye Res 20: 1–28.
  21. 21. Kunemund V, Jungalwala FB, Fischer G, Chou DK, Keilhauer G, et al. (1988) The L2/HNK-1 carbohydrate of neural cell adhesion molecules is involved in cell interactions. J Cell Biol 106: 213–223.
  22. 22. Yu RK, Yanagisawa M (2006) Glycobiology of neural stem cells. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5: 415–423.
  23. 23. Martini R, Xin Y, Schmitz B, Schachner M (1992) The L2/HNK-1 Carbohydrate Epitope is Involved in the Preferential Outgrowth of Motor Neurons on Ventral Roots and Motor Nerves. Eur J Neurosci 4: 628–639.
  24. 24. Imiya K, Ishizaki T, Seiki T, Saito F, Inazawa J, et al. (2002) cDNA cloning, genomic structure and chromosomal mapping of the mouse glucuronyltransferase-S involved in the biosynthesis of the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope. Gene 296: 29–36.
  25. 25. Kakuda S, Oka S, Kawasaki T (2004) Purification and characterization of two recombinant human glucuronyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of HNK-1 carbohydrate in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 35: 111–119.
  26. 26. Kakuda S, Sato Y, Tonoyama Y, Oka S, Kawasaki T (2005) Different acceptor specificities of two glucuronyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of HNK-1 carbohydrate. Glycobiology 15: 203–210.
  27. 27. Seiki T, Oka S, Terayama K, Imiya K, Kawasaki T (1999) Molecular cloning and expression of a second glucuronyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 255: 182–187.
  28. 28. Terayama K, Oka S, Seiki T, Miki Y, Nakamura A, et al. (1997) Cloning and functional expression of a novel glucuronyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of the carbohydrate epitope HNK-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 6093–6098.
  29. 29. Morita I, Kizuka Y, Kakuda S, Oka S (2008) Expression and function of the HNK-1 carbohydrate. J Biochem 143: 719–724.
  30. 30. Oka S, Terayama K, Kawashima C, Kawasaki T (1992) A novel glucuronyltransferase in nervous system presumably associated with the biosynthesis of HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope on glycoproteins. J Biol Chem 267: 22711–22714.
  31. 31. Kitagawa H, Tone Y, Tamura J, Neumann KW, Ogawa T, et al. (1998) Molecular cloning and expression of glucuronyltransferase I involved in the biosynthesis of the glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region of proteoglycans. J Biol Chem 273: 6615–6618.
  32. 32. Wood W, Jacinto A (2007) Drosophila melanogaster embryonic haemocytes: masters of multitasking. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 542–551.
  33. 33. Kim BT, Tsuchida K, Lincecum J, Kitagawa H, Bernfield M, et al. (2003) Identification and characterization of three Drosophila melanogaster glucuronyltransferases responsible for the synthesis of the conserved glycosaminoglycan-protein linkage region of proteoglycans. Two novel homologs exhibit broad specificity toward oligosaccharides from proteoglycans, glycoproteins, and glycosphingolipids. J Biol Chem 278: 9116–9124.
  34. 34. Jeffries AR, Mungall AJ, Dawson E, Halls K, Langford CF, et al. (2003) beta-1,3-Glucuronyltransferase-1 gene implicated as a candidate for a schizophrenia-like psychosis through molecular analysis of a balanced translocation. Mol Psychiatry 8: 654–663.
  35. 35. Morita I, Kakuda S, Takeuchi Y, Itoh S, Kawasaki N, et al. (2009) HNK-1 glyco-epitope regulates the stability of the glutamate receptor subunit GluR2 on the neuronal cell surface. J Biol Chem 284: 30209–30217.
  36. 36. Yamamoto S, Oka S, Inoue M, Shimuta M, Manabe T, et al. (2002) Mice deficient in nervous system-specific carbohydrate epitope HNK-1 exhibit impaired synaptic plasticity and spatial learning. J Biol Chem 277: 27227–27231.
  37. 37. Anzai D, Tonoyama Y, Ikeda A, Kawasaki T, Oka S (2009) Regulated expression of the HNK-1 carbohydrate is essential for medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryogenesis. Glycobiology 19: 868–878.
  38. 38. Li H, Chaney S, Roberts IJ, Forte M, Hirsh J (2000) Ectopic G-protein expression in dopamine and serotonin neurons blocks cocaine sensitization in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 10: 211–214.
  39. 39. Thibault ST, Singer MA, Miyazaki WY, Milash B, Dompe NA, et al. (2004) A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat Genet 36: 283–287.
  40. 40. Parks AL, Cook KR, Belvin M, Dompe NA, Fawcett R, et al. (2004) Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet 36: 288–292.
  41. 41. Chou TB, Perrimon N (1996) The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1673–1679.
  42. 42. Inoue M, Kato K, Matsuhashi H, Kizuka Y, Kawasaki T, et al. (2007) Distributions of glucuronyltransferases, GlcAT-P and GlcAT-S, and their target substrate, the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope in the adult mouse brain with or without a targeted deletion of the GlcAT-P gene. Brain Res 1179: 1–15.
  43. 43. LaJeunesse DR, Buckner SM, Lake J, Na C, Pirt A, et al. (2004) Three new Drosophila markers of intracellular membranes. Biotechniques: 36: 784-788–790.
  44. 44. Kizuka Y, Tonoyama Y, Oka S (2009) Distinct transport and intracellular activities of two GlcAT-P isoforms. J Biol Chem 284: 9247–9256.
  45. 45. Venken KJ, Kasprowicz J, Kuenen S, Yan J, Hassan BA, et al. (2008) Recombineering-mediated tagging of Drosophila genomic constructs for in vivo localization and acute protein inactivation. Nucleic Acids Res 36: e114.
  46. 46. Saudou F, Boschert U, Amlaiky N, Plassat JL, Hen R (1992) A family of Drosophila serotonin receptors with distinct intracellular signalling properties and expression patterns. EMBO J 11: 7–17.
  47. 47. Hummel T, Leifker K, Klambt C (2000) The Drosophila HEM-2/NAP1 homolog KETTE controls axonal pathfinding and cytoskeletal organization. Genes Dev 14: 863–873.
  48. 48. Udolph G, Rath P, Tio M, Toh J, Fang W, et al. (2009) On the roles of Notch, Delta, kuzbanian, and inscuteable during the development of Drosophila embryonic neuroblast lineages. Dev Biol 336: 156–168.
  49. 49. Akam M (1987) The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101: 1–22.
  50. 50. Connolly JB, Roberts IJ, Armstrong JD, Kaiser K, Forte M, et al. (1996) Associative learning disrupted by impaired Gs signaling in Drosophila mushroom bodies. Science 274: 2104–2107.
  51. 51. Pereanu W, Hartenstein V (2006) Neural lineages of the Drosophila brain: a three-dimensional digital atlas of the pattern of lineage location and projection at the late larval stage. J Neurosci 26: 5534–5553.
  52. 52. Bello BC, Hirth F, Gould AP (2003) A pulse of the Drosophila Hox protein Abdominal-A schedules the end of neural proliferation via neuroblast apoptosis. Neuron 37: 209–219.
  53. 53. Sun B, Xu P, Salvaterra PM (1999) Dynamic visualization of nervous system in live Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 10438–10443.
  54. 54. Olofsson B, Page DT (2005) Condensation of the central nervous system in embryonic Drosophila is inhibited by blocking hemocyte migration or neural activity. Dev Biol 279: 233–243.
  55. 55. Lin YR, Reddy BV, Irvine KD (2008) Requirement for a core 1 galactosyltransferase in the Drosophila nervous system. Dev Dyn 237: 3703–3714.
  56. 56. Knibiehler M, Lazdunski C (1987) Conformation of colicin A: apparent difference between cytoplasmic and extracellular polypeptide chain. FEBS Lett 216: 183–189.
  57. 57. Mirre C, Cecchini JP, Le Parco Y, Knibiehler B (1988) De novo expression of a type IV collagen gene in Drosophila embryos is restricted to mesodermal derivatives and occurs at germ band shortening. Development 102: 369–376.
  58. 58. Xiong WC, Okano H, Patel NH, Blendy JA, Montell C (1994) repo encodes a glial-specific homeo domain protein required in the Drosophila nervous system. Genes Dev 8: 981–994.
  59. 59. Halter DA, Urban J, Rickert C, Ner SS, Ito K, et al. (1995) The homeobox gene repo is required for the differentiation and maintenance of glia function in the embryonic nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 121: 317–332.
  60. 60. Yuasa Y, Okabe M, Yoshikawa S, Tabuchi K, Xiong WC, et al. (2003) Drosophila homeodomain protein REPO controls glial differentiation by cooperating with ETS and BTB transcription factors. Development 130: 2419–2428.
  61. 61. Rodrigues F, Schmidt I, Klambt C (2011) Comparing peripheral glial cell differentiation in Drosophila and vertebrates. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 55–69.
  62. 62. Kruse J, Mailhammer R, Wernecke H, Faissner A, Sommer I, et al. (1984) Neural cell adhesion molecules and myelin-associated glycoprotein share a common carbohydrate moiety recognized by monoclonal antibodies L2 and HNK-1. Nature 311: 153–155.
  63. 63. McGarry RC, Helfand SL, Quarles RH, Roder JC (1983) Recognition of myelin-associated glycoprotein by the monoclonal antibody HNK-1. Nature 306: 376–378.
  64. 64. Dodd J, Morton SB, Karagogeos D, Yamamoto M, Jessell TM (1988) Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurons. Neuron 1: 105–116.
  65. 65. Bollensen E, Schachner M (1987) The peripheral myelin glycoprotein P0 expresses the L2/HNK-1 and L3 carbohydrate structures shared by neural adhesion molecules. Neurosci Lett 82: 77–82.
  66. 66. Shashoua VE, Holmquist B (1986) Extracellular fluid proteins of goldfish brain: evidence for the presence of proteases and esterases. J Neurochem 47: 738–743.
  67. 67. Aoki K, Porterfield M, Lee SS, Dong B, Nguyen K, et al. (2008) The diversity of O-linked glycans expressed during Drosophila melanogaster development reflects stage- and tissue-specific requirements for cell signaling. J Biol Chem 283: 30385–30400.
  68. 68. Breloy I, Schwientek T, Lehr S, Hanisch FG (2008) Glucuronic acid can extend O-linked core 1 glycans, but it contributes only weakly to the negative surface charge of Drosophila melanogaster Schneider-2 cells. FEBS Lett 582: 1593–1598.
  69. 69. Schweitzer J, Becker T, Lefebvre J, Granato M, Schachner M, et al. (2005) Tenascin-C is involved in motor axon outgrowth in the trunk of developing zebrafish. Dev Dyn 234: 550–566.
  70. 70. Siddiqui S, Horvat-Brocker A, Faissner A (2008) The glia-derived extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-C promotes embryonic and postnatal retina axon outgrowth via the alternatively spliced fibronectin type III domain TNfnD. Neuron Glia Biol 4: 271–283.
  71. 71. Edenfeld G, Stork T, Klambt C (2005) Neuron-glia interaction in the insect nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 34–39.
  72. 72. Nave KA, Trapp BD (2008) Axon-glial signaling and the glial support of axon function. Annu Rev Neurosci 31: 535–561.
  73. 73. Broadie K, Baumgartner S, Prokop A (2011) Extracellular matrix and its receptors in Drosophila neural development. Dev Neurobiol.
  74. 74. Kim SH, Turnbull J, Guimond S (2011) Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J Endocrinol 209: 139–151.
  75. 75. Rozario T, DeSimone DW (2010) The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: a dynamic view. Dev Biol 341: 126–140.
  76. 76. Myers JP, Santiago-Medina M, Gomez TM (2011) Regulation of axonal outgrowth and pathfinding by integrin-ECM interactions. Dev Neurobiol.
  77. 77. Sanchez-Soriano N, Goncalves-Pimentel C, Beaven R, Haessler U, Ofner-Ziegenfuss L, et al. (2010) Drosophila growth cones: a genetically tractable platform for the analysis of axonal growth dynamics. Dev Neurobiol 70: 58–71.
  78. 78. Staehling-Hampton K, Hoffmann FM (1994) Ectopic decapentaplegic in the Drosophila midgut alters the expression of five homeotic genes, dpp, and wingless, causing specific morphological defects. Dev Biol 164: 502–512.