Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effects of Elevated CO2 and N Addition on Growth and N2 Fixation of a Legume Subshrub (Caragana microphylla Lam.) in Temperate Grassland in China

  • Lin Zhang,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

  • Dongxiu Wu ,

    wudx@ibcas.ac.cn

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

  • Huiqiu Shi,

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquanlu, Beijing, China

  • Canjuan Zhang,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

  • Xiaoyun Zhan,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

  • Shuangxi Zhou

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China

Abstract

It is well demonstrated that the responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration are species-specific and dependent on environmental conditions. We investigated the responses of a subshrub legume species, Caragana microphylla Lam., to elevated CO2 and nitrogen (N) addition using open-top chambers in a semiarid temperate grassland in northern China for three years. Measured variables include leaf photosynthetic rate, shoot biomass, root biomass, symbiotic nitrogenase activity, and leaf N content. Symbiotic nitrogenase activity was determined by the C2H2 reduction method. Elevated CO2 enhanced photosynthesis and shoot biomass by 83% and 25%, respectively, and the enhancement of shoot biomass was significant only at a high N concentration. In addition, the photosynthetic capacity of C. microphylla did not show down-regulation under elevated CO2. Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on root biomass, symbiotic nitrogenase activity and leaf N content. Under elevated CO2, N addition stimulated photosynthesis and shoot biomass. By contrast, N addition strongly inhibited symbiotic nitrogenase activity and slightly increased leaf N content of C. microphylla under both CO2 levels, and had no significant effect on root biomass. The effect of elevated CO2 and N addition on C. microphylla did not show interannual variation, except for the effect of N addition on leaf N content. These results indicate that shoot growth of C. microphylla is more sensitive to elevated CO2 than is root growth. The stimulation of shoot growth of C. microphylla under elevated CO2 or N addition is not associated with changes in N2-fixation. Additionally, elevated CO2 and N addition interacted to affect shoot growth of C. microphylla with a stimulatory effect occurring only under combination of these two factors.

Introduction

Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration caused by combustion of fossil fuels and enhanced nitrogen (N) deposition by human activities are two factors associated with global climate change. These factors are likely to have a widespread influence on individual plant communities and their interactions with each other [1]. It is well documented that the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration stimulates photosynthesis, plant biomass and plant water-use efficiency in many plant species, and that these effects are dependent on plant species as well as nutrient availability [2], [3]. It is hypothesized that the sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2 will be constrained by the progressive N limitation induced by the growth stimulation of increased CO2 [4], [5]. Therefore, the interaction between CO2 and soil N availability has attracted intense interest, and varying results have been reported in different studies [3], [6], [7]. For example, the results from a six-year field study of perennial grassland species showed that the positive effect of CO2 without N addition is reduced substantially [5]. However, plant growth in scrub-oak woodland showed a sustained increase after 11 years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment with enhanced inorganic N absorption from deep soil [6].

Differential sensitivities of different plant species or functional groups in response to elevated CO2 are often observed. Legumes show greater response to elevated CO2 through symbiotic N2 fixation to counteract the progressive N limitation than any other functional types in most cases [8]. Lee et al (2003) reported that the legume species Lupinus perennis showed a stronger response to elevated CO2 than non-leguminous species independent of N status, and that a 47% greater proportion of N was derived from stimulated N2 fixation relative to other sources of N at elevated CO2 [9]. The significant stimulation of N2 fixation by elevated CO2 is also reported in Trifolium repens in a fertilized Swiss grassland [10], Galactia elliottii in Florida scrub oak [11], soybean [8] and alfalfa [12]. The positive effect of elevated CO2 on N2 fixation may also contribute to the positive response of the co-occurring non-leguminous plants in response to elevated CO2 [13]. However, stimulation of N2 fixation by CO2 can only occur under conditions in which other nutrients (e.g. P, K, and Mg) are not limited [14], [15], [16]. Furthermore, the stimulatory effect of elevated CO2 on N2 fixation has been found to diminish with the extended period of CO2 enrichment in oak woodland [15]. In addition, the response of legumes and symbiotic N2 fixation to elevated CO2 is species-specific and dependent on N availability in the soil [17], [18]. Fixation of N2 is often suppressed by N fertilization [19], [20], but not in all cases [21]. It is predicted that plants would fix N2 by symbiosis under conditions where it is less costly than soil N uptake [22], and show a significant yield response to N addition when the N2 fixation apparatus unable to meet plant N demand [20], [23]. Furthermore, how elevated CO2 affects the suppression of N fixation with N addition remains unclear, but varies from no effect [16] to a positive effect [19]. In addition, elevated CO2 partly promotes shrub encroachment in arid or semiarid grasslands [24]. As most shrubs are C3 plants, they may benefit relatively more from higher levels of CO2 compared to many C4 grasses [25]. Elevated CO2 may slow soil water depletion by herbaceous vegetation, thus promoting the establishment of deeper-rooted shrubs, especially in semiarid and/or arid areas [26], [27], [28]. Although an increase in woody plant density was observed after CO2 enrichment for five years in semiarid shortgrass steppe in Colorado [24], it remains unclear whether elevated atmospheric CO2 plays a widespread role in encroachment of C3 shrub and woody plants into grasslands [26], [29].

The leguminous sub-shrub Caragana microphylla is a common species that dominates an important plant successional stage in the semiarid grasslands in northern China. It is reported that the distribution of C. microphylla shrubs in the Xilin River Basin in northern China has increased substantially in recent years [30], [31], [32]. This study was conducted to determine how the growth and symbiotic N2 fixation of C. microphylla respond to elevated CO2 and N addition in a semiarid temperate grassland over three growing seasons.

Materials and Methods

Research site

The experiment was conducted at the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS) (43°38′N, 116°42′E; 1100 m altitude) in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China. The site is located in the Eurasian steppe region, which is the largest contiguous grassland in the world. The site has a continental, moderate temperate, semiarid climate characterized by long, cool, dry winters and short, warm, moist summers. The mean annual temperature is 0.8°C, and the mean annual precipitation is 340.2 mm, with the majority (86%) of the rainfall occurring during the growing season (May to September) during the previous 24 years (1982–2005). During the three experimental years (2006–2008), the mean annual temperature was 1.4°C, 2.2°C, and 1.6°C, respectively, and the annual total rainfall was 304.1 mm, 240.1 mm and 363.5 mm, respectively [33].

Plant materials, experimental design and treatments

The experiment was conducted on C. microphylla (Fig. S1). There were four treatment groups: ambient CO2 without N addition (C), elevated CO2 without N addition (E), ambient CO2 with N addition (CN), and elevated CO2 with N addition (EN). The experiment followed a split-plot design, with the CO2 treatment applied at the whole plot level (with three chambers for each of the two CO2 levels) and the N addition treatments applied at the split-plot level (pot-within-chamber). The experiment was conducted for three years (2006–2008) and most variables were measured in each year.

Six field open-top chambers (3 m in diameter, 3 m in height) were used. Three of the chambers contained the current CO2 concentration (380 µmol mol−1) and the other three contained an elevated CO2 concentration (760 µmol mol−1) (Fig. S2) [33]. For N addition treatment, 17.5 g m−2 of N [34] was added in each year by applying (NH4)2SO4 solution at the beginning and in the middle of the growing season.

The experiment site (15 m×15 m) was established in 2005. Pots (30 cm diameter, 30 cm deep) were filled with the universal native dark chestnut soil, and then buried underground with the pot mouth positioned at the ground surface. The soil organic carbon concentration was 0.081% and total N concentration was 0.704%. Seeds of C. microphylla, collected in the vicinity of the research station, were sown in pots in late autumn in 2005. At the beginning of the experiment in 2006, plants were thinned to 20 plants per pot.

Shoot biomass was harvested and oven dried at 65°C to constant mass and weighed in 2006–2007. In 2008, the whole plant was harvested, and shoot and root biomass processed separately. Soil was carefully removed from roots, which were temporarily stored at 4°C until all nodules could be removed for determination of symbiotic nitrogenase activity (see below). The remaining root biomass and shoot biomass were oven dried at 65°C to constant mass and weighed.

Symbiotic nitrogenase activity was determined by the C2H2 reduction method [35] using nodules within 48 h of collection. Nodules were placed in a 25 ml closed culture bottle and sealed with rubber. Three ml C2H2 gas was injected into the culture bottles and incubated for 2 hours at 28°C, after which 1 ml gas samples were collected from each bottle and analyzed for production of C2H4 using gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-7AG gas chromatograph, Shimadzu Corp., Japan). The parameters used for spectrometer determination of symbiotic nitrogenase activity with the flame ionization detector (FID) were as follows: column temperature 60°C, detector temperature 250°C, sample temperature 120°C, gas flow of H2 0.7 kg cm−2, N2 35 ml min−1, and air 0.6 kg cm−2. Production of C2H4 (µmol g−1 h−1) was used to calculate symbiotic nitrogenase activity. Specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity (SNA) represented the symbiotic nitrogenase activity per unit weight of nodule. Plant symbiotic nitrogenase activity (PNA) represented the symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant.

Specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity for the CN treatment was treated as missing data since live root nodules collected from this treatment were insufficient for measurement.

Leaf gas exchange (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) measurements were conducted in situ using a portable, steady-state gas exchange system, incorporating an infrared gas analyzer (LI-6400, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA), in late August 2007 and mid-July 2008. Measurements were made on three leaves of randomly chosen individual plants in each pot on sunny days. The second healthy leaf from the top of the plants was selected. Photosynthetic rates were determined under light-saturating conditions (PAR 1500 µmol m−2 s−1), constant leaf air temperature (25°C), and at the CO2 concentration under which the plants were grown (i.e., 380 or 760 µmol mol−1) as long-term responses. In addition, for plants grown under ambient CO2 photosynthetic rates were determined at 760 µmol mol−1 CO2 to assess the short-term response of the species to instantaneous CO2 enrichment [36]. Following gas exchange measurement, leaf areas were measured with a leaf area meter (LI-3100, Li-Cor) and photosynthetic rates were calibrated with the known area.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of data was conducted using the Statistical Analysis System 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). There were three replicates for each treatment group. Split-plot analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using mixed model procedures with CO2 concentration as the whole-plot factor and N as the split-plot factor. Year was taken as a repeated factor for indices measured in multiple years, such as photosynthetic rate, shoot biomass, and leaf N content. Tukey's studentized range test was conducted to make pairwise comparisons of means for those indices in which ANOVA showed a significant effect. Results were considered to be significant at P≤0.05, and highly significant at P≤0.01.

Results

Effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on net photosynthesis

Both elevated CO2 and N addition had significant effects on leaf-level gas exchange of C. microphylla (P<0.05, Table 1), and their interactions also had a significant effect (P<0.01, Table 1). Elevated CO2 markedly increased the light-saturated leaf net photosynthetic rate (Asat) under both N levels across the three years, with average increases of 83% (Fig. 1A). Plant grown under high N showed an average 29% higher photosynthetic rate than those grown under low N. However, the stimulatory effect of N addition on Asat was different between the two CO2 concentrations, with a 40% increase occurring at the elevated CO2 concentration. The responses of Asat to elevated CO2, N addition or both did not vary significantly between the 2 years (Table 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Light-saturated leaf net photosynthetic rate (Asat, µmol m−2 s−1) and down-regulation of photosynthesis of C. microphylla.

Plants were grown and measured under ambient (380 µmol mol−1) or elevated (760 µmol mol−1) CO2 concentrations (A), and plants were grown under ambient or elevated CO2 and measured at a common CO2 concentration of 760 µmol mol−1 (B) at two nitrogen-amended levels (0 and 17.5 g N m−2 year−1 applied to native N-deficient soil) in the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. Treatments: ambient CO2 without N addition (C); elevated CO2 without N addition (E); ambient CO2 with N addition (CN); elevated CO2 with N addition (EN); grown at ambient but measured in elevated CO2 without N addition (C′); grown at ambient but measured in elevated CO2 with N addition (C′N). Bars represent means and error bars the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Results (P-values) of mixed model ANOVA for the effects of elevated CO2 (CO2), N addition (N) and their interactions on shoot biomass and leaf nitrogen content (Leaf N) in three growing years (Y; 2006 to 2008), and light-saturated leaf net photosynthetic rate (Asat) and down-regulation of photosynthesis (D) in 2007 and 2008, and root biomass, root/shoot ratio (R/S), specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity (SNA) and symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant (PNA) in 2008.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.t001

In addition, when measured with the same elevated CO2, Asat did not differ significantly between C plants and E plants, as well as between CN plants and EN plants. This implied that no acclimation of photosynthesis occurred in C. microphylla (Table 1, Fig. 1B).

Effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on aboveground growth

Elevated CO2 significantly stimulated shoot biomass by 25% when all treatments were considered (P<0.05, Table 1). The stimulation of elevated CO2 was significant only under high N concentration (Fig. 2). Addition of N significantly stimulated shoot biomass by 32% (P<0.05) at elevated CO2, but showed no significant effect on shoot biomass at ambient CO2 across the three years.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Shoot biomass per pot of C. microphylla.

Plants were grown in open-top chambers under ambient (380 µmol mol−1) and elevated (760 µmol mol−1) atmospheric CO2 concentrations at two nitrogen levels (0 and 17.5 g N m−2 year−1) in the growing seasons from 2006 to 2008. Treatments: ambient CO2 without N addition (C); elevated CO2 without N addition (E); ambient CO2 with N addition (CN); elevated CO2 with N addition (EN). Bars represent means and error bars the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.g002

Shoot biomass in 2006 was significantly lower than in 2007 and 2008. The shoot biomass increased by 62% (P<0.001) in 2007 and 69% (P<0.001) in 2008 compared with that in 2006. Annual variation in shoot biomass was not significantly affected by CO2 concentration, N addition or their interaction.

Effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on root biomass and root/shoot ratio

Neither elevated CO2, N addition nor their interaction significantly affected root biomass (Fig. 3A, Table 1). Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on root/shoot ratio either. However, N addition significantly decreased the root/shoot ratio by 34% at elevated CO2 (P<0.01, Table 1), but had no significant effect on the root/shoot ratio at ambient CO2 (Table 1, Fig. 3B).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Root biomass (A) and root/shoot ratio (B) per pot of C. microphylla.

Plants were grown under ambient (380 µmol mol−1) and elevated (760 µmol mol−1) atmospheric CO2 concentrations at two nitrogen levels (0 and 17.5 g N m−2 year−1) in 2008. Treatments: ambient CO2 without N addition (C); elevated CO2 without N addition (E); ambient CO2 with N addition (CN); elevated CO2 with N addition (EN). Bars represent means and error bars the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.g003

Effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity and symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant

Elevated CO2 did not significantly affect specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity (Fig. 4A) and symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant (Fig. 4B, Table 1). Addition of N had no significant effect on specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity, but markedly decreased symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant by over 95% (P<0.05, Table 1, Fig. 4).

thumbnail
Figure 4. The specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity (SNA, µmol C2H2 g−1 h−1) (A), and symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant (PNA, µmol C2H2 g−1 h−1) (B) of C. microphylla.

Plants were grown under ambient (380 µmol mol−1) and elevated (760 µmol mol−1) atmospheric CO2 concentrations at two nitrogen levels (0 and 17.5 g N m−2 year−1) in 2008. Treatments: ambient CO2 without N addition (C); elevated CO2 without N addition (E); ambient CO2 with N addition (CN); elevated CO2 with N addition (EN). Bars represent means and error bars the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.g004

Effects of elevated CO2 and N addition on leaf N content

Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on leaf N content, whereas N addition significantly enhanced leaf N content by 10% in all treatments over the three years (P<0.01, Table 1, Fig. 5). No interaction effect between CO2 and N addition on leaf N content was detected. The increase in leaf N content induced by N addition differed between the three years: 1% in 2006 (ns), 13% in 2007 (P<0.01) and 18% in 2008 (P<0.01).

thumbnail
Figure 5. The leaf N content (Leaf N, %) of C. microphylla.

Plants were grown under ambient (380 µmol mol−1) and elevated (760 µmol mol−1) atmospheric CO2 concentrations at two nitrogen levels (0 and 17.5 g N m−2 year−1) in the growing seasons from 2006 to 2008. Treatments: ambient CO2 without N addition (C); elevated CO2 without N addition (E); ambient CO2 with N addition (CN); elevated CO2 with N addition (EN). Bars represent means and error bars the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.g005

Discussion

Effect of elevated CO2 on N2 fixation and growth of C. microphylla

Our finding that elevated CO2 has a stimulatory effect on photosynthetic rates in the leguminous subshrub C. microphylla is consistent with most previous studies on other plant species [37], [38], [39]. Numerous studies have found that stimulation of photosynthetic rates induced by elevated CO2 will decrease or even disminished over time as plants acclimate to elevated CO2 concentrations through a process known as down-regulation [36], [38], [40]. Acclimation of photosynthesis can be partly explained by N scarcity or progressive reduction in N availability, since the down-regulation of photosynthesis induced by elevated CO2 is always highly associated with reduction of leaf N content [5], [39]. Results in the present study revealed that acclimation of photosynthesis did not occur in C. microphylla. This is in line with the hypothesis proposed by many previous studies that species capable of symbiosis with N2-fixing organisms may sustain longer stimulation [2], [9]. Accordingly, leaf N content of C. microphylla in this study did not vary with CO2 concentration.

In the present study, symbiotic nitrogenase activity did not respond significantly to elevated CO2 concentrations. The effect of elevated CO2 on N2-fixation may be positive, neutral or negative, depending on the species examined, soil N acquisition [18], or availability of other soil resources, such as phosphorus [14], [22]. Thus, it can be inferred that the symbiotic N2-fixation of C. microphylla is not sensitive to changes in CO2 concentration. Another possible explanation is that other limited nutrients, such as P, constrain the responses of N2-fixation of C. microphylla to elevated CO2. Availability of P is reported to be more limited than that of N in our experimental area [41]. Although the N2-fixation was not enhanced by elevated CO2, C. microphylla could utilize soil N more efficiently at elevated CO2 (unpublished data).

The finding that elevated CO2 had a significant positive effect on shoot biomass, but not on root biomass, implies that shoot growth of C. microphylla is more sensitive to elevated CO2 than that of root growth. This finding is in contrast to the non-leguminous species Leymus chinensis in the same experiment field [33]. Previous studies have shown that the relative responses of root systems to elevated CO2 are species specific and dependent on experimental conditions [33], [42], [43]. For example, Arnone et al. found that among 12 grassland studies in different areas, seven showed little or no change in root-system size under elevated CO2 [44]. On the other hand, pots may constrain growth of the root system and may therefore partly depress the root response to elevated CO2 when plants are grown in pots [33], [45]. However, root growth of C. microphylla was not significantly suppressed by pot containment in this study because C. microphylla is a slow-growing shrub and was in early seedling stage. Additionally, the shoot response of C. microphylla to elevated CO2 is much higher than L. chinensis (25% vs. 9%) in the same experimental field [33]. This is in line with most previous studies, which reported that legume species show a stronger response to elevated CO2 than non-leguminous species [39]. This result implies that the relative competitiveness of the legume C. microphylla with L. chinensis, the dominant temperate grassland species in the study area, will increase in the future under elevated CO2 conditions.

In the present study, the stimulatory effect of elevated CO2 on C. microphylla was dependent on N status. This finding is similar to that with other shrubs [46], but in contrast to herbaceous legume species, which always show a strong response to elevated CO2 independent of N status [9]. On the other hand, the effect of CO2 on photosynthesis, growth, and leaf N content of C. microphylla did not show any annual variation, even though the weather conditions varied among the study years.

Effect of N addition and its interaction with elevated CO2 on growth and N2 fixation of C. microphylla

The stimulatory effects of N addition on photosynthesis and shoot biomass, as well as its inhibitory effect on the root/shoot ratio, were only observed under elevated CO2 in the present study. These results indicate that accumulation of photosynthate and biomass allocation in response to soil N supply was affected by elevated CO2. The finding that N addition had no significant effect on biomass production of C. microphylla at ambient CO2 is consistent with some previous studies on legumes [47], but is inconsistent with the effect on biomass production by the grass species L. chinensis in the same experimental field, which was greatly increased by N addition. This indicated the competitiveness of C. microphylla with the herbaceous species L. chinensis would decrease with N addition at ambient CO2. However, when plants were grown under elevated CO2, N addition had a positive effect on C. microphylla growth and with a similar degree of enhancement on L. chinensis. This indicates that the depressive effect of N fertilization or deposition on the competitiveness of C. microphylla with L. chinensis would be alleviated by elevated CO2. This is in line with indications from other studies that elevated CO2 may reduce the increased risk of legume species loss due to the N fertilization or deposition [3], [48].

The most obvious effect of N addition on C. microphylla in the present study is its inhibitory effect on symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant. This inhibitory effect is in agreement with most previous reports on other plant species, while the detrimental effect of N addition on symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant in the current study is more serious than that of other reports [9], [19]. The greater effect may be attributed to the relatively high N concentration applied in the present study. Given that no changes in specific symbiotic nitrogenase activity and reduction in root nodule number under the high N level in the current study [49], it can be concluded that the strong decrease in symbiotic nitrogenase activity per plant under the high N level mainly resulted from the inhibitory effect of N addition on nodule formation.

In the present study, the effect of N addition on photosynthesis and shoot biomass of C. microphylla did not show interannual variation. However, the stimulatory effect of N addition on leaf N content was increased across years. This implies that the responses of C. microphylla to N addition may be more affected by interannual climatic variation than elevated CO2.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that elevated CO2 stimulates leaf-level photosynthesis of C. microphylla and no acclimation of photosynthesis occurred over the three experimental years. Elevated CO2 stimulates shoot growth of C. microphylla, but only under a high N concentration. Shoot growth of C. microphylla is more sensitive to elevated CO2 than is root growth. Elevated CO2 has no effect on symbiotic nitrogenase activity. Addition of N markedly inhibits N2 fixation capacity, but stimulates photosynthesis and shoot growth, of C. microphylla. However, the stimulatory effect of N addition occurred only under elevated CO2 condition. Interaction between CO2 and N significantly affected photosynthesis, shoot biomass and biomass allocation of C. microphylla. When compared to responses of the grass species L. chinensis grown in the same experimental field, N addition tends to decrease the relative competitiveness of C. microphylla, whereas elevated CO2 tends to increase competitiveness. These results indicate that elevated CO2 will interact with N deposition in the future to benefit the growth of the leguminous subshrub C. microphylla.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

The photograph of the C. microphylla in the Xilin River Basin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

The photograph of the six open-top chambers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026842.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for providing the temperature and precipitation data, as well as help with facilities. We are grateful to Wen-Hao Zhang for his valuable comments and improvement of the language in the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DW LZ. Performed the experiments: LZ HS CZ XZ SZ. Analyzed the data: LZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LZ. Wrote the paper: LZ DW.

References

  1. 1. Reich PB, Hungate BA, Luo YQ (2006) Carbon-nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems in response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 611–636.
  2. 2. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy. New Phytologist 165: 351–371.
  3. 3. Reich PB (2009) Elevated CO2 reduces losses of plant diversity caused by nitrogen deposition. Science 326: 1399–1402.
  4. 4. Luo Y, Su B, Currie WS, Dukes JS, Finzi A, et al. (2004) Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54: 731–739.
  5. 5. Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Lee T, Ellsworth DS, West JB, et al. (2006) Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 440: 922–925.
  6. 6. McKinley DC, Romero JC, Hungate BA, Drake BG, Megonigal JP (2009) Does deep soil N availability sustain long-term ecosystem responses to elevated CO2? Global Change Biology 15: 2035–2048.
  7. 7. Shaw MR, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Mooney HA, et al. (2002) Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298: 1987–1990.
  8. 8. Rogers A, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Morgan PB, Bernacchi CJ, et al. (2006) Increased C availability at elevated carbon dioxide concentration improves N assimilation in a legume. Plant Cell and Environment 29: 1651–1658.
  9. 9. Lee TD, Tjoelker MG, Reich PB, Russelle MP (2003) Contrasting growth response of an N2-fixing and non-fixing forb to elevated CO2: dependence on soil N supply. Plant and Soil 255: 475–486.
  10. 10. Lüscher A, Hartwig UA, Suter D, Nösberger J (2000) Direct evidence that symbiotic N2 fixation in fertile grassland is an important trait for a strong response of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology 6: 655–662.
  11. 11. Hungate BA, Dijkstra P, Johnson DW, Hinkle CR, Drake BG (1999) Elevated CO2 increases nitrogen fixation and decreases soil nitrogen mineralization in Florida scrub oak. Global Change Biology 5: 781–789.
  12. 12. Fischinger SA, Hristozkova M, Mainassara ZA, Schulze J (2010) Elevated CO2 concentration around alfalfa nodules increases N2 fixation. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 121–130.
  13. 13. Hartwig UA, Luscher A, Daepp M, Blum H, Soussana JF, et al. (2000) Due to symbiotic N2 fixation, five years of elevated atmospheric pCO2 had no effect on the N concentration of plant litter in fertile, mixed grassland. Plant and Soil 224: 43–50.
  14. 14. Edwards EJ, McCaffery S, Evans JR (2006) Phosphorus availability and elevated CO2 affect biological nitrogen fixation and nutrient fluxes in a clover-dominated sward. New Phytologist 169: 157–167.
  15. 15. Hungate BA, Stiling PD, Dijkstra P, Johnson DW, Ketterer ME, et al. (2004) CO2 elicits long-term decline in nitrogen fixation. Science 304: 1291–1291.
  16. 16. van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate BA, de Graaff MA, van Breemen N, et al. (2006) Element interactions limit soil carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 6571–6574.
  17. 17. Leadley PW, Niklaus PA, Stocker R, Korner C (1999) A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 on plant biomass and community structure in a calcareous grassland. Oecologia 118: 39–49.
  18. 18. West JB, HilleRisLambers J, Lee TD, Hobbie SE, Reich PB (2005) Legume species identity and soil nitrogen supply determine symbiotic nitrogen-fixation responses to elevated atmospheric [CO2]. New Phytologist 167: 523–530.
  19. 19. Thomas RB, Bashkin MA, Richter DD (2000) Nitrogen inhibition of nodulation and N2 fixation of a tropical N2 fixing tree (Gliricidia sepium) grown in elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytologist 145: 233–243.
  20. 20. Dobermann A, Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE, Walters DT, et al. (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: A review. Field Crops Research 108: 1–13.
  21. 21. Pearson HL, Vitousek PM (2002) Soil phosphorus fractions and symbiotic nitrogen fixation across a substrate-age gradient in Hawaii. Ecosystems 5: 587–596.
  22. 22. Vitousek PM, Cassman K, Cleveland C, Crews T, Field CB, et al. (2002) Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeochemistry 57: 1–45.
  23. 23. Thies JE, Singleton PW, Bohlool BB (1995) Phenology, growth, and yield of field-grown soybean and bush bean as a function of varying modes of N-nutrition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 27: 575–583.
  24. 24. Morgan JA, Milchunas DG, LeCain DR, West M, Mosier AR (2007) Carbon dioxide enrichment alters plant community structure and accelerates shrub growth in the shortgrass steppe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 14724–14729.
  25. 25. Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Helliker BR (1997) C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2 and climate. Oecologia 112: 285–299.
  26. 26. Polley HW, Johnson HB, Tischler CR (2002) Woody invasion of grasslands: evidence that CO2 enrichment indirectly promotes establishment of Prosopis glandulosa. Plant Ecology 164: 85–94.
  27. 27. Scott RL, Huxman TE, Williams DG, Goodrich DC (2006) Ecohydrological impacts of woody-plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment. Global Change Biology 12: 311–324.
  28. 28. Zavaleta ES (2006) Shrub establishment under experimental global changes in a California grassland. Plant Ecology 184: 53–63.
  29. 29. Van Auken OW (2009) Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2931–2942.
  30. 30. Xiong XG, Han XG, Bai YF, Pan QM (2003) Increased distribution of Caragana microphylla in rangelands and its causes and consequences in Xilin River Basin. Acta Pratacultural Science 12: 57–62.
  31. 31. Christensen L, Coughenour MB, Ellis JE, Chen ZZ (2004) Vulnerability of the Asian typical steppe to grazing and climate change. Climatic Change 63: 351–368.
  32. 32. Xiong XG, Han XG (2005) Spatial heterogeneity in soil carbon and nitrogen resources, caused by Caragana microphylla, in the thicketization of semiarid grassland, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25: 1678–1683.
  33. 33. Zhang L, Yang YX, Zhan XY, Zhang CJ, Zhou SX, et al. (2010) Responses of a dominant temperate grassland plant (Leymus chinensis) to elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen addition in China. Journal of Environmental Quality 39: 251–259.
  34. 34. Pan Q, Bai Y, Han X, Yang J (2005) Effects of nitrogen addication on a leymus chinesis population in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese version) 29: 7.
  35. 35. Lee KK, Alimagno B, Yoshida T (1977) Field technique using acetylene-reduction method to assay nitrogenase activity and its association with rice rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 47: 519–526.
  36. 36. Lee TD, Tjoelker MG, Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (2001) Leaf gas exchange responses of 13 prairie grassland species to elevated CO2 and increased nitrogen supply. New Phytologist 150: 405–418.
  37. 37. Curtis PS (1996) A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell and Environment 19: 127–137.
  38. 38. Drake BG, GonzalezMeler MA, Long SP (1997) More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609–639.
  39. 39. Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD (2004) Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 - do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist 162: 253–280.
  40. 40. Oechel WC, Cowles S, Grulke N, Hastings SJ, Lawrence B, et al. (1994) Transient nature of CO2 fertilization in Arctic tundra. Nature 371: 500–503.
  41. 41. Lü XT, Han XG (2010) Nutrient resorption responses to water and nitrogen amendment in semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. Plant and Soil 327: 481–487.
  42. 42. Suter D, Frehner M, Fischer BU, Nosberger J, Luscher A (2002) Elevated CO2 increases carbon allocation to the roots of Lolium perenne under free-air CO2 enrichment but not in a controlled environment. New Phytologist 154: 65–75.
  43. 43. Wang XZ, Taub DR (2010) Interactive effects of elevated carbon dioxide and environmental stresses on root mass fraction in plants: a meta-analytical synthesis using pairwise techniques. Oecologia 163: 1–11.
  44. 44. Arnone JA, Zaller JG, Spehn EM, Niklaus PA, Wells CE, et al. (2000) Dynamics of root systems in native grasslands: effects of elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytologist 147: 73–86.
  45. 45. Mcconnaughay KDM, Berntson GM, Bazzaz FA (1993) Limitations to CO2-induced growth enhancement in pot studies. Oecologia 94: 550–557.
  46. 46. Jin VL, Evans RD (2010) Elevated CO2 increases plant uptake of organic and inorganic N in the desert shrub Larrea tridentata. Oecologia 163: 257–266.
  47. 47. Xia JY, Wan SQ (2008) Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition. New Phytologist 179: 428–439.
  48. 48. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, et al. (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 4387–4392.
  49. 49. Zhang C, Wu D, Zhang L, Zhan X, Zhou S, et al. (2009) Nodule characteristics of three-year-old caragana microphylla and their responses to environmental changes in an inner Mongolia grassland. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese version) 33: 1165–1176.