Research Article

Comparative Genome Analysis Provides Insights into the Evolution and Adaptation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi on Aesculus hippocastanum

  • Sarah Green mail,

    Affiliation: Centre for Forestry and Climate Change, Forest Research, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom

  • David J. Studholme,

    Affiliation: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

    Current address: School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom

  • Bridget E. Laue,

    Affiliation: Centre for Forestry and Climate Change, Forest Research, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom

  • Federico Dorati,

    Affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

  • Helen Lovell,

    Affiliation: Centre for Research in Plant Science, University of the West of England, Bristol, Avon and Somerset, United Kingdom

  • Dawn Arnold,

    Affiliation: Centre for Research in Plant Science, University of the West of England, Bristol, Avon and Somerset, United Kingdom

  • Joan E. Cottrell,

    Affiliation: Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Forest Research, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom

  • Stephen Bridgett,

    Affiliation: The GenePool Genomics Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian and Borders, United Kingdom

  • Mark Blaxter,

    Affiliations: The GenePool Genomics Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian and Borders, United Kingdom, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian and Borders, United Kingdom

  • Edgar Huitema,

    Affiliation: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

    Current address: Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Tayside, United Kingdom

  • Richard Thwaites,

    Affiliation: The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

  • Paul M. Sharp,

    Affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian and Borders, United Kingdom

  • Robert W. Jackson equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Robert W. Jackson, Sophien Kamoun

    Affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, The University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

  • Sophien Kamoun equal contributor

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Robert W. Jackson, Sophien Kamoun

    Affiliation: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

  • Published: April 19, 2010
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010224


A recently emerging bleeding canker disease, caused by Pseudomonas syringae pathovar aesculi (Pae), is threatening European horse chestnut in northwest Europe. Very little is known about the origin and biology of this new disease. We used the nucleotide sequences of seven commonly used marker genes to investigate the phylogeny of three strains isolated recently from bleeding stem cankers on European horse chestnut in Britain (E-Pae). On the basis of these sequences alone, the E-Pae strains were identical to the Pae type-strain (I-Pae), isolated from leaf spots on Indian horse chestnut in India in 1969. The phylogenetic analyses also showed that Pae belongs to a distinct clade of P. syringae pathovars adapted to woody hosts. We generated genome-wide Illumina sequence data from the three E-Pae strains and one strain of I-Pae. Comparative genomic analyses revealed pathovar-specific genomic regions in Pae potentially implicated in virulence on a tree host, including genes for the catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds and enterobactin synthesis. Several gene clusters displayed intra-pathovar variation, including those encoding type IV secretion, a novel fatty acid biosynthesis pathway and a sucrose uptake pathway. Rates of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the four Pae genomes indicate that the three E-Pae strains diverged from each other much more recently than they diverged from I-Pae. The very low genetic diversity among the three geographically distinct E-Pae strains suggests that they originate from a single, recent introduction into Britain, thus highlighting the serious environmental risks posed by the spread of an exotic plant pathogenic bacterium to a new geographic location. The genomic regions in Pae that are absent from other P. syringae pathovars that infect herbaceous hosts may represent candidate genetic adaptations to infection of the woody parts of the tree.


In recent decades there has been an unprecedented rise in cases of exotic or previously unknown invasive plant diseases emerging in new ecosystems, posing a threat to food security and to urban as well as rural plant communities [1]. The rise in mobility of human populations and increased global commerce, for example in the international plant trade, have likely contributed to the spread of these pathogens to new geographical areas where previously unexposed plants have not yet evolved specific resistance [2]. Usually, little information is available on the origin, biology and genetics of these newly arising diseases during the early stages of an epidemic. Comparative genomics, based on an ever-increasing number of complete genome sequences, can be used to reveal numerous insights into host-pathogen interactions, the evolution of pathogenic lifestyles and adaptation to new niches [3]. Due to the recent developments in genomics technology, it is becoming almost routine to sequence emerging prokaryotic pathogens of humans [4]. However, genomics tools have not been rapidly and systematically applied to emerging plant pathogens, therefore hindering the opportunity to gain useful insights into the biology of emerging plant diseases.

Bleeding canker of European horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) is a destructive new disease which was first noticed in 2002/2003. The disease is currently affecting hundreds of thousands of European horse chestnut trees across several countries in northwest Europe, resulting in severe damage to rural and urban amenity landscapes [5], [6]. Disease symptoms include bleeding cankers located on the stem and branches, foliar discoloration, and crown dieback often leading to tree death [6]. In 2007, over 70% of horse chestnut trees surveyed in parts of England exhibited symptoms typical of bleeding canker disease, with 36% and 42% of surveyed trees showing these symptoms in Wales and Scotland, respectively [7]. The causal agent responsible for this new epidemic has only recently been identified as the Gram-negative fluorescent bacterium, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar aesculi (Pae). This identification was based on a partial sequence for its gyrase B gene, which was identical to that of the Pae type strain isolated from leaf spot lesions on Indian horse chestnut (Aesculus indica) from the Himachal Pradesh, Northern India in 1969. Prior to the European epidemic, this was the only location where Pae had been reported [5], [6], [8][10]. This suggests that Pae may have originated from India and been recently introduced into Europe. If this is indeed the case, Pae has found a new host, European horse chestnut, on which it is highly mobile and aggressive, causing frequently lethal stem cankers (Figure 1A) that contrast with the minor leaf lesions observed on Indian horse chestnut (Figure 1B). This emerging disease has become an important tree health issue in Great Britain, attracting intense and broad public attention due to its dramatic impact on a tree species of such high amenity and cultural value.


Figure 1. Disease symptoms of Pae on horse chestnut.

(A) Bleeding canker on stem of European horse chestnut caused by E-Pae and (B) leaf spots (arrows) on Indian horse chestnut caused by I-Pae.


The Pae epidemic has highlighted gaps in our general understanding of the biology of bacterial diseases of trees. There are at least 50 pathovars of the species Pseudomonas syringae, which can be distinguished by host range, and which infect a wide range of mostly herbaceous but also some woody plants. Almost nothing is known about the biology of Pae on European horse chestnut, including the reasons for its apparently sudden emergence, the genetic factors contributing to its observed high levels of virulence on a woody host or its evolutionary relationships to other strains of P. syringae. Due to its aggressiveness and rapidity of spread throughout a high proportion of the European horse chestnut population in affected countries, Pae presents an excellent model system for gaining a greater understanding of bacterial tree diseases. Due to the economic importance of P. syringae pathovars and their value as models for studying plant pathogenesis, complete genome sequence data are available for three pathovars on herbaceous hosts, tomato and bean; P. syringae pv. tomato DC300 (Pto DC3000), P. syringae pv. syringae (Psy B728a) and P. syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pph 1448A) [11][13]. Draft genome sequences are also available for two other pathovars; P. syringae pv. oryzae (Por1-6) pathogenic on rice and P. syringae pv. tabaci (Pta 11528) which causes disease on wild tobacco [14], [15]. These complete and draft P. syringae genome sequences provide important reference sequences for a comparative genomic study of Pae.

We have generated good quality draft genome sequences for a strain of Pae recently isolated from a bleeding canker on diseased European horse chestnut in Britain (strain 2250) as well as the Indian type strain of Pae that causes a leaf-spot disease on Indian horse chestnut [8], [9]. We also generated whole-genome re-sequencing data for two additional Pae strains (P6617 and P6623) from different geographical locations in Britain. These are the first reported whole-genome sequences for pseudomonad pathogens of a woody host. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the biology and evolution of Pae strains causing the current disease epidemic on European horse chestnut. We achieved this by comparing the Pae genome with sequences from other P. syringae pathovars and by determining the genomic variation among all four Pae strains. We show that Pae belongs to a distinct clade of P. syringae pathovars that specialise in infecting woody hosts. Pae harbors genomic regions that are absent from other P. syringae pathovars that infect herbaceous hosts and represent candidate genetic adaptations to pathogenicity on woody parts of the tree. Comparison of sequences in the core genome reveals that the British Pae strains are very closely related and, most likely, descend from a single, recent introduction into Britain. Their relationship with Indian Pae is more distant but sufficiently close that they share nucleotide sequence identity over seven house-keeping genes. However, despite the close relationship between the British and Indian strains of Pae, their genomes display marked differences resulting from loss and/or gain of a range of genes since their divergence.


Genome-wide sequence data

We generated genome-wide Illumina [16] sequence data from three strains of Pae recently isolated from diseased European horse chestnut trees in Britain (henceforth referred to as E-Pae). These included E-Pae 2250 (from Pitlochry, Perthshire, Scotland, 2008), E-Pae P6617 (from Glasgow, Strathclyde, Scotland, 2006) and E-Pae P6623 (from Farnham, Surrey, England, 2006). We also generated genome-wide Illumina sequence data from the type-strain, Pae NCPPB3681, originally isolated from Indian horse chestnut in India in 1969 (henceforth referred to as I-Pae). Of the three E-Pae strains, 2250 generated the highest quality sequence and this, along with that of I-Pae, was used to generate draft de novo genome assemblies as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thus, unless otherwise indicated, E-Pae refers to the 2250 strain assembly.

The E-Pae genome assembly (strain 2250) yielded 776 contigs comprising 364 scaffolds (maximum scaffold length = 190 kb; N50 scaffold length = 42.5 kb). The sum of the contig lengths for E-Pae was 5,926,327 nucleotides, which is approximately the expected size based on previously sequenced P. syringae genomes, and the assembly contained 5,621 predicted protein-coding genes. The I-Pae genome assembly yielded 841 contigs comprising 557 scaffolds (maximum scaffold length = 93 kb; N50 scaffold length = 26.4 kb). The sum of the contig lengths for I-Pae was 5,895,455 nucleotides and the assembly contained 5,683 predicted protein-coding genes. The sequences of the assemblies have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers ACXT00000000 (E-Pae) and ACXS00000000 (I-Pae).

Pae belongs to a distinct clade of pathogens of woody hosts

The evolutionary relationships among numerous P. syringae pathovars (but not including Pae) have previously been investigated using the concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping genes [17]. We extracted the orthologous sequences from the four Pae genome assemblies and found that the four strains were identical over the alignment of 3,129 nucleotides. Our phylogenetic analyses (Figure 2) placed Pae within a major lineage referred to as group 3 in [17], and apparently corresponding to genomospecies 2 as defined by earlier DNA-DNA hybrization studies [18]. Interestingly, most of the strains within group 3 and genomospecies 2 are associated with herbaceous hosts. However, Pae fell within a statistically well-supported clade (Figure 2) comprised of pathovars morsprunorum, myricae, savastanoi and mori; these are pathogens of apricot, bayberry, olive and mulberry, respectively, which are all woody plants.


Figure 2. Evolutionary relationship of P. syringae pv. aesculi to other strains of P. syringae.

Phylogenetic relationships were estimated from concatenated sequences from seven housekeeping genes (3129 bp) using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method (See MATERIALS AND METHODS). Values in brackets indicate numbers of strains of the same pathovar with identical sequences (e.g., four strains of Pae). Red branches indicate the clade comprised of four pathovars that infect a woody host. Stars mark internal branches supported by posterior probability values of at least 0.98. The scale bar represents 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per site. Details are shown only for the clade designated as group 3 by [17], which corresponds to genomospecies 2 [18]; group 2 contains genomospecies 1 strains including P. syringae pv. syringae, group 1 contains genomospecies 3 strains including P. syringae pv. tomato, and group 4 contains probable genomospecies 4 strains including P. syringae pv. oryzae.


Evolutionary relationships among Pae strains

On the basis of the seven previously used housekeeping gene sequences, the three E-Pae strains and the single I-Pae strain were identical. However, the genome-wide Illumina sequence data allowed us to undertake a comprehensive search for genetic variation among the strains over three megabases of genome for which there was sufficiently deep coverage and unambiguous Illumina data from all four strains

The sequences of the three E-Pae strains isolated from the woody parts of European horse chestnut differed at only three nucleotides over the three megabases. Recent analyses of the rates of short-term evolution in Neisseria [19], Helicobacter [20] and Campylobacter [21] have all yielded estimated mutation rates in the range 3-5×10−5 substitutions per site per year. The E-Pae strains differed at 0-6×10−7 substitutions per site. Therefore, unless P. syringae accumulates nucleotide substitutions at a rate several orders of magnitude slower than these other bacteria, our data indicate that the E-Pae strains share a very recent common ancestor and are descended from a single introduction into Britain.

I-Pae differed from E-Pae at 1,613 nucleotides over the same three megabases of the genome. While this reflects a very low level of divergence (only 5×10−4 nucleotide substitutions per site) it nevertheless indicates that the common ancestry of E-Pae and I-Pae occurred long before the divergence of the E-Pae strains from each other.

Pae harbors pathovar-specific genomic regions of potential importance in adaptation to Aesculus

The draft genomes of E-Pae and I-Pae showed greatest sequence similarity to Pph 1448A and Pta 11528 when compared with the genomes of other previously sequenced P. syringae strains from herbaceous hosts, based on genome-wide MUMMER alignments. This is consistent with the results of the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2) based on the seven housekeeping genes. Based on MUMMER alignments, approximately 15% of the E-Pae and 15% of the I-Pae genomes were not conserved in Pph 1448A or Pta 11528. Therefore, we hypothesised that the Pae genomes might contain sequences specifically related to their association with a tree host. We identified 85 genomic regions from E-Pae (each between 1 kb and 23 kb long) that showed no detectable nucleotide sequence similarity to Pph 1448A, Pta 11528, Pto DC3000, Psy B728a, nor Por 1_6. The total length of these regions was 270 kb. We also identified 307 kb of sequences in I-Pae that had no similarity to the sequenced genomes of other pathovars. Some of these genomic regions currently found only in Pae could be implicated in fitness on a tree host. These are examined in greater detail in the following sections.

Catabolism of phenolic compounds

Of considerable significance was the presence of a 46 kb contig (GenBank: ACXT01000012) in E-Pae, most of which was conserved in I-Pae, that shared no nucleotide sequence similarity with sequenced genomes of other P. syringae pathovars over most of its length and contained predicted genes for the catabolism of phenolic compounds (Figure 3, Table 1). Eight predicted proteins coded for by this region in E-Pae (0368 to 0374 and 0381) had greatest amino acid sequence identities with enzymes involved in the catabolism of benzoate via the catechol branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway [22] found in soil-inhabiting, decomposing bacteria including Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas putida (Table 1). In addition, proteins encoded by genes 0377 and 0380 on this contig were also likely to be involved in the catabolism of phenolic compounds (Table 1).

Another contig in E-Pae encoded four predicted proteins (genes 1439, 1440, 1442, 1444; located on a 27 kb contig, GenBank: ACXT01000075) that were present in I-Pae, but not conserved in other sequenced P. syringae pathovars associated with herbaceous hosts (Figure 4, Table 2). These four proteins showed homology to enzymes involved in protocatechuate degradation via the protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway and included amongst them the iron-requiring β-subunit of protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase (Table 2).


Figure 3. An E-Pae encoded pathway for the catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds.

Shown is a 20 kb section of a 46 kb E-Pae contig (GenBank: ACXT01000012) which contains putative genes encoding enzymes for the catabolism of benzoate via the catechol branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway (Indicated by red arrows). Full details of the predicted genes based on blastp searches are shown in Table 1. Regions of sequence identity with other P. syringae genomes (with a significance threshold of 1e-10) are indicated by the green bars. Grey arrows indicate uncharacterized proteins.


Table 1. Predicted proteins in E-Pae that may be involved in the catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds via the catechol branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway.


Iron acquisition

Both E-Pae and I-Pae encoded a number of genes involved in iron acquisition that have not yet been found in other pathovars of P. syringae associated with herbaceous hosts (Figure 4, Table 2). Most prominent was a gene cluster related to the enterobactin (Ent) siderophore biosynthesis genes entABEC, an Ent import component related to FepB, a homologue of the enterobactin exporter (EntS), and the esterase (Fes) involved in ferri-enterobactin dissociation (E-Pae genes 1447, 1449 and 1453-1458 on GenBank: ACXT01000075; I-Pae genes 2794-2799 on GenBank: ACXT01000181; 3668 and 3670 on GenBank: ACXT01000216). BLASTP analyses of the entABEC-encoded proteins in Pae found the highest protein identities in the soil dwelling bacteria Pseudomonas entomophila (EntE, 59%; EntC, 55%) and Azotobacter vinelandii (EntA, 50%; EntB, 48%; EntE, 50%; EntC, 47%) (Table 2). Interestingly, this novel enterobactin gene cluster lies on the same 27 kb contig (GenBank: ACXT01000075) and in close proximity to the three proteins involved in the protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway (described above) in E-Pae and I-Pae (Figure 4).


Figure 4. E-Pae-encoded pathways for the catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds and enterobactin biosynthesis.

Shown is a 27 kb E-Pae contig (Genbank: ACXT01000075) which includes genes encoding the protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway (yellow arrows) as well as a pathway for enterobactin biosynthesis (blue arrows). Full details of the predicted genes based on blastp searches are shown in Table 2. Regions of sequence identity with other P. syringae genomes (with a significance threshold of 1e-10) are indicated by the green bars. Uncharacterized or hypothetical proteins are indicated by grey arrows.


Table 2. Predicted proteins in E-Pae that may be involved in the catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds via the protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway (A–D) and enterobactin synthesis (F–P).


Nitric oxide metabolism

We identified two genes with a predicted function in nitric oxide metabolism, which are conserved in both E-Pae (genes 0518 and 0519 on GenBank:ACXT01000019); see Figure S1), and I-Pae (genes 3361 and 3362 on GenBank: ACXT01000267) but which are not present in other sequenced P. syringae pathovars. These genes may have a role in protection of Pae from host defence responses [23], [24]. The predicted product of E-Pae gene 0518 shared 61% amino acid sequence identity with a nitric oxide (NO) dioxygenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that converts NO to NO3, and gene 0519 shared 48% identity with the σ54-dependent nitric oxide reductase transcription regulator NorR [25], from the denitrifying bacterium Ralstonia eutropha, which reduces NO to N2O under anaerobic conditions. A canonical σ54-binding site sequence is also located upstream of this gene, consistent with it being the regulatory target of the NorR homologue.

Secondary metabolism

A 10 kb genomic region, conserved in both E-Pae (genes 0811-0819 on GenBank: ACXT01000515) and I-Pae (genes 1753-1761 on GenBank: ACXS01000161) but not in other sequenced P. syringae pathovars, appeared to encode a secondary metabolism pathway involved in the production of a toxin. E-Pae gene 0812 shared 21% amino acid sequence identity with a novel redox protein toxin (CADD), previously only known in Chlamydia spp., that contains a di-iron centre and has been implicated in the modulation of host cell apoptosis [26]. The protein product of E-Pae gene 0814 shared 26% identity with an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (Swiss-Prot: P26829). Other genes in the cluster encoded protein sequences with similarity to aminotransferases (0813), dioxygenases (0815) and acetylornithine deacetylase (0818). The cluster also encoded a transcriptional regulator (0811) and a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter (0819) that might be involved in regulation of the pathway and transport of a product or substrate.

E-Pae and I-Pae show genomic differences implicated in host association and fitness

Given that E-Pae was isolated from cankers on woody organs and I-Pae from leaf spots, we expected to find strain-specific genes and gene clusters that may reflect their different mechanisms of pathogenesis. Comparisons between the sequence assemblies of E-Pae and I-Pae revealed several differences, which included Type III secretion system (T3SS) proteins and factors implicated in fitness (Table 3). There were a number of genomic regions present in I-Pae but absent from E-Pae, including two Type VI secretion systems (T6SS) (Tables S1. S2), a microcin gene cluster (Figure S2) and a novel methionine sulphoxide (Table 3), which are described in more detail in Text S1. Of greater interest were a number of genes and pathways which were present in E-Pae and absent from I-Pae which might reflect adaptation to the woody parts of the tree.


Table 3. Examples of intra-pathovar variation within Pae in terms of presence or absence of genes.


E-Pae encoded seven predicted proteins which were not present in I-Pae and which had the highest amino acid sequence identities and synteny with a cluster of genes (Spro_2863-2869) from Serratia proteamaculans 568, an endophytic bacterium isolated from the roots of a woody host, Populus trichocarpa [27] (Figure 5, Table 4). This unique E-Pae gene cluster (0961-0967) also shared homology with the bacterial soft rot pathogen, Pectobacterium carotovorum subspecies carotovorum (synonym Erwinina carotovora) strain PC1 (PC1_4136-4142) but shared no nucleotide sequence similarity with other sequenced P. syringae pathovars. Although the function of this gene cluster has not been described for S. proteamaculans or P. carotovorum subspecies carotovorum, several of the genes are implicated in fatty acid biosynthesis (Table 4).


Figure 5. An E-Pae-encoded pathway for the biosynthesis of fatty acids.

Shown is a cluster of genes in E-Pae implicated in fatty acid biosynthesis (indicated by the red arrows) with homology to Serratia proteamaculans, but which is absent in I-Pae and other P. syringae pathovars. The seven genes (A–G) occupy the entire 6.8 kb contig (GenBank: ACXT01000043). Full details of the predicted genes based on blastp searches are shown in Table 4.


Table 4. Genes in E-Pae that may be involved in fatty acid biosynthesis.


E-Pae harbored a cluster of genes predicted to be involved in sucrose uptake and utilization including genes for a putative sucrose porin and a sucrose (invertase) enzyme, SacA (Figure 6, Table 5) [28], [29]. These genes were conserved in Pph 1448A but were absent from I-Pae. Also present in E-Pae were several genes involved in iron sensing and transport, including iron and haemin ABC transporters, TonB-dependent outer-membrane siderophore receptors and iron-responsive regulators which were not present in I-Pae. For example, E-Pae genes 0996-0998 (GenBank: ACXT01000045) encoded a TonB-dependent receptor and two proteins resembling the ferric-dicitrate responsive regulatory system, FecIR.


Figure 6. An E-Pae-encoded pathway for the utilization of sucrose.

Shown is a cluster of genes in E-Pae which is implicated in the uptake and utilization of sucrose but which is not found in I-Pae. Details of the predicted genes based on blastp searches are shown in Table 5. This gene cluster is homologous to a region of Pph 448A (96–98% nucleotide sequence identity). In E-Pae the six principal genes (A–F) are on a 7.4 kb section of a 32.1 kb contig (GenBank: ACXT01000147.1) whereas the transcriptional regulator (G) is found at the beginning of a 12 kb contig (GenBank: ACXT01000532.1); (the first 67 codons are missing from the start of the contig). Genes in E-Pae are indicated by the blue arrows; genes in Pph 1448A are represented by the green arrows.


Table 5. Genes in E-Pae that are likely to be involved in sucrose utilization (as depicted in Figure 6).


E-Pae and I-Pae each encoded a filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA)-like protein (E-Pae genes 3169 and 4454; I-Pae genes 3880-3883) recognizable by the presence of a haemagglutination activity domain (Pfam:PF05860). The FHA-like proteins in each strain had distinctly different sequences; in E-Pae the protein was very closely related to Pto DC3000 protein PSPTO_3229 and was conserved at the nucleotide sequence level in Pta 11528, but not in Psy B728, Pph 1448A or Por 1-6. In contrast, the gene encoding a FHA-like protein in I-Pae showed no detectable nucleotide sequence similarity to any previously sequenced genome. However, at the protein level this sequence most closely resembled FHA-like sequences from Yersinia spp. and Pectobacterium spp. (up to 61.5% identity over a 272 amino acid conserved region near the N terminus) (Figure S3). These FHA-like proteins may have a role in attachment to host cells, also of bacterial cells to each other in biofilm production, or possibly to insect vectors since haemagglutinin-like proteins were found to be associated with adhesion of Xylella fastidiosa to leafhopper vectors [30].

Type III secretion systems in Pae

The type III secretion system (T3SS) plays a central role in pathogenicity of P. syringae. The genome of Pph 1448A encodes two distinct T3SS: the Hrp T3SS, which is responsible for delivering effectors into plant host cells, and a second system whose function is unknown [13]. Both T3SS gene clusters were conserved in Pae (Table S3). Since T3SS effectors play a key role in the ability of P. syringae to overcome plant host defences, we wanted to compare the effector repertoires of Pae strains with those of previously studied P. syringae strains. Both I-Pae and E-Pae contained genes encoding orthologues of AvrA1, AvrB4, AvrE1, AvrPto1, HopA2, HopAB1, HopAE1, HopAF1, HopAH2, HopAM1, HopAO1, HopAS1, HopD1, HopF1, HopG1, HopI1, HopM1, HopO1, HopF2, HopQ1, HopR1, HopT1, HopV1 and HopX1 (File S1).

The “dispensable genome” of Pae

A bacterial genome consists of two compartments: a “core genome” containing genes conserved in all the strains of a given species, and a “dispensable genome” containing genes that are absent from one or more strains. Together, these two components make up the “pan-genome” [31]. Comparative studies of previously sequenced genomes [11][15], [32] have revealed a large pan-genome for the species P. syringae; up to 30% of the genome of a given strain is absent from strains of distantly related pathovars. However, there has been little investigation of the dynamics of the dispensable genome over very short phylogenetic distances, such as within a single pathovar.

Among the three E-Pae strains, only few genes had been gained or lost since their divergence from a common ancestor. E-Pae strain P6617 lacked close homologues of eight genes that were conserved among E-Pae strains 2250 and P6623, and P. syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pph 1448A) (Table 3). In Pph 1448A, these genes are located on the plasmids and so are likely also to be located on plasmids in Pae. Therefore gain or loss of whole plasmids might explain the variation in gene-content among E-Pae strains. Additionally, the presence of mobile genetic elements including Tn3 family transposons and insertion sequence elements from several families (IS3, IS5, IS21, IS66, IS91, IS111A, ISRSO5) may also facilitate genomic variation in E-Pae.

We found that about 5% of either genome differed between I-Pae and E-Pae, thus comprising part of the dispensable genome for this pathovar. This degree of gene loss and gain is consistent with the greater nucleotide divergence between E-Pae and I-Pae (compared with that among E-Pae strains). Out of the 245 predicted genes in E-Pae that were absent from I-Pae, 170 were located on contigs that exhibited some nucleotide sequence similarity with plasmids in other bacterial genomes. These included genes involved in bacterial conjugation and plasmid transfer. For example, a 52.7 kb E-Pae scaffold (GenBank: GG700389) contains 31 predicted genes, including 14 conjugal transfer (tra) genes, that are homologous to genes located on plasmids from the tomato pathogen Pto DC3000. In addition, some of the genomic regions that differed between E-Pae and I-Pae were homologous to phage sequences (e.g. GenBank: GG700353 in E-Pae and GenBank: ACXS01000599 in I-Pae).

Variation in plasmid content among Pae strains

Since plasmids might account for a significant part of the large-scale genomic differences among strains of Pae, we compared the number and size of native plasmids present within the genomes of each of the four Pae strains by agarose gel electrophoresis [33]. We found that all four Pae strains harbored native plasmids (Figure 7A). I-Pae had a different complement of plasmids (three plasmids of ca. 70, 100 and 120 kb in size) compared with E-Pae strains, all of which harboured 4–6 plasmids. The E-Pae strains also varied in their plasmid complement, with strain 2250 carrying a unique plasmid of ca. 66 kb and strain P6617 lacking another plasmid (ca. 70 kb) present in both 2250 and P6623.


Figure 7. Plasmid profiles of Pae.

Agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out as described by [33] to compare the number and size of native plasmids present within the genomes of each of the four Pae strains; P. syringae pv. phaseolicola strain 1448A was included for comparison. M represents marker plasmids from Escherichia coli strain 39R861 [60]. Note that E-Pae strains 2250 and P6623 have two similarly sized plasmids of ca. 70 kb.



We have exploited high-throughput sequencing technology to perform genome-wide surveys of genetic variation in Pae, the causative agent of bleeding canker of European horse chestnut. This has provided novel insights into the evolutionary origin of the pathogen and has revealed a suite of genes present in E-Pae which may facilitate its virulence and fast rate of spread on European horse chestnut. The Pae-specific pathways identified here are potentially highly important for the understanding of bacterial diseases of woody plants. It is clear that comparative genomics can quickly generate large amounts of genetic information on newly emerging plant diseases that will be valuable in development of strategies to combat future biosecurity threats posed by phytopathogens.

Since Pae is a newly emerging disease of unknown origin, we wanted to confirm the taxonomic placement of E-Pae strains causing the epidemic and determine the evolutionary relationships between Pae and other P. syringae pathovars. On the basis of seven house-keeping genes whose sequences are commonly used as phylogenetic markers [17], E-Pae strains recently isolated from the woody parts of diseased trees in Britain were identical to the I-Pae type-strain isolated from leaf tissues in India five decades ago. This close phylogenetic relationship is consistent with the classification of both I-Pae and E-Pae within the same pathovar of P. syringae. We also revealed that Pae belongs to a distinct clade of P. syringae genomospecies 2 pathovars that specialize on woody hosts. An interesting feature of this clade is that pathovar mori, which causes bacterial leaf spot of mulberry [34] and was isolated from leaves, lies outside a sub-group comprising Pae and pvs. morsprunorum, savastanoi and myricae, all of which cause cankers or galls in woody organs [35], [36]. Thus, this lineage within genomospecies 2 appears to have first colonized woody hosts, then adapted to infecting the woody parts of the host. These niche changes are likely to have required genetic adaptations, including the acquisition of new suites of genes and probably loss of redundant genes. I-Pae, however, is only known to infect leaves of Indian horse chestnut in its native region and we speculate that it may have only recently lost the ability to infect woody organs.

A number of economically important tree diseases are caused by P. syringae, including pvs. syringae and morsprunorum on stone fruit, savastanoi on olive and avellanae on hazelnut. Nonetheless, the virulence traits that enable infection of woody organs remain unknown [36], [37]. E-Pae is remarkably aggressive on European horse chestnut in causing extensive stem cankers that can kill large, mature trees within one to two seasons following infection. We therefore expected that E-Pae might possess a suite of genes required for pathogenesis in woody parts of the host. Using comparative genomics we were able to identify genomic regions present in Pae that share no sequence similarity to previously sequenced P. syringae genomes and which appear to code for traits potentially useful for fitness on a tree host. It remains to be seen whether any of these apparently Pae-specific genomic regions, discussed below, are also conserved in other P. syringae pathovars of woody hosts for which few sequence data are currently available.

Of particular significance for the aetiology of the disease epidemic on European horse chestnut are the Pae-encoded pathways for the degradation of plant-derived aromatic compounds such as lignin derivatives and other phenolics. These involve the catechol branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway and protocatechuate degradation via the protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway. The β-ketoadipate pathway consists of two parallel branches for the catabolism of catechol and protocatechuate, derived from benzoate and 4-hydroxybenzoate, respectively, and plays a central role in the degradation of naturally occurring aromatic compounds derived from lignin and other plant components [22]. Other sequenced P. syringae pathovars on herbaceous hosts harbor genes that encode for the protocatechuate branch only [13]. This branch degrades derivatives of vanillate, an important intermediate metabolite in the microbial degradation of lignin-derived compounds [38]. The fact that Pae possesses genes that encode both the catechol and protocatechuate branches of the pathway implies that it has the additional ability to utilize unsubstituted lignin-related compounds such as cinnamate, as well as other plant-derived phenolic compounds including mandalate (2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetate) and phenol [22].

The protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathway, also apparently encoded by Pae, is a route for the degradation of protocatechuate that is currently not well understood [39]. The 4-hydroxybenzoate transporter protein encoded by Pae has been found to play a role in establishing the preferential degradation of benzoate via the catechol branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway in P. putida [40]. The beta-subunit of protocatechuate 4, 5-dioxygenase, also encoded by Pae, is known as LigB in Sphingomonas paucimobilis, which is a bacterium well characterised for its ability to utilize various types of lignin-derived biaryls [39]. This enzyme, which employs iron as a co-factor, is known to be involved in the degradation of protocatechuate from vanillate [38], as well as in the degradation of 3-0-methylgallate. This latter substrate is a metabolite of syringate, itself an important, lignin-derived monoaryl [41]. Protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase also has identity with the ligZ gene in S. paucimobilis that has a role in the biphenyl catabolic pathway of lignin degradation [39].

Pae is the first pathovar of P. syringae found to harbor these genes that encode the catechol and protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase pathways for degradation of aromatic compounds. These are pathways commonly associated with soil-dwelling bacterial species such as P. putida and Acinetobacter spp. known for their ability to break down a wide range of aromatic compounds including those derived from plants. It is possible that these pathways enable Pae to utilize as carbon sources aromatic substrates specifically derived from the tissues of woody plants. Other substrates may include phenols, coumarins and tannins laid down by tree hosts as structural defense responses to disease-causing organisms [41]. Microscopic observations of young branches of European horse chestnut naturally infected by Pae reveal that the bacterium causes cellular disruption in the cortex, phloem, and cambium [Steele et al., unpublished]. In these Pae-infected branches the xylem can be plugged and discolored although xylem vessels are not apparently degraded. Future functional analyses through mutagenesis and complementation experiments will evaluate the precise role of these identified genes in infection of woody organs.

Iron is a major limiting nutrient in microbial growth, and pathways for the efficient uptake and utilization of iron are essential virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria [42]. Pae encoded a number of genes not yet found in other pathovars of P. syringae that are involved in iron acquisition, the most significant being a pathway for enterobactin siderophore biosynthesis. Enterobactin is the siderophore with the highest known affinity, primarily described in Enterobacteriaceae [42]. Although an ecological role for enterobactin has yet to be discovered, the presence of this gene cluster could confer upon Pae a considerable fitness advantage, particularly in an iron-limited environment.

Another mechanism in Pae that might be important to survival during host infection is the presence of the two genes that have a predicted function in nitric oxide metabolism. Both enzymes encoded by these genes have a role in the protection of bacteria from NO, which is an antimicrobial toxin produced by a host's immune response [23]. Neither gene has been found previously in P. syringae. Importantly, NO has been shown to play a key role in plant disease resistance by acting as a signal which induces plant genes to synthesise defense-related products [24]. Inhibitors of NO synthesis thereby compromise the plant's disease-resistance response and promote bacterial growth in planta [24]. Pae also encodes a novel toxin pathway not yet found in other P. syringae pathovars which appears to involve a CADD-type redox protein [26]. Although the function of such putative novel pathways cannot currently be predicted with certainty, it is possible that they function as toxins active against host plants, competing microbes, or insect vectors [43].

There were several genomic regions present in E-Pae which were absent from I-Pae and which may represent genetic adaptations specifically required for infection of the woody parts of Aesculus. These include a gene cluster with homology to Serratia proteamaculans 568 and Pectobacterium carotovorum subspecies carotovorum. The role of this cluster is unknown, but based on the predicted functions of the proteins encoded in E-Pae we suggest that it is a novel pathway for the biosynthesis of a long-chain fatty acid associated with the bacterial cell wall. Given that this E-Pae gene cluster is found in root-infecting bacteria but absent from other sequenced P. syringae pathovars, the encoded fatty acid could function as a permeability barrier, providing protection to bacterial cells in the harsh environments associated with soils or woody organs, similar to the role of mycolic acids in Mycobacterium species [44].

Our genomic comparison revealed the presence of sucrose utilization genes in E-Pae, but not in I-Pae. Sucrose is the predominant form of translocated carbohydrate within plants [45] and can represent over 95% of the dry weight of material translocated in the sieve tubes of the phloem [41]. Strains of E-Pae isolated from bleeding cankers on European horse chestnut cause lesions in the phloem of stems and branches, are isolated consistently from phloem tissue and may use the phloem as a conduit for spread within the tree [Steele et al., unpublished], unlike the leaf-infecting I-Pae. Therefore, an ability to utilize sucrose as a carbon source could be advantageous to growth of E-Pae within the stem and branches of European horse chestnut.

E-Pae and I-Pae encoded distinctly different filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA)-like proteins, which may be a reflection of their different mechanisms for infection. FHA are large beta-helical proteins, with the best-characterized example being the Bordetella pertussis FHA which appears to enable adhesion to eukaryotic host cells. During infection of mammals by Bordetella, FHA may also have additional functions such as immuno-suppression [46], [47] and host specificity [48]. In bacterial plant pathogens, FHA-like proteins appear to play a role in disease by facilitating adhesion between bacterial cells and plant host cells [49], [50] In Xylella fastidiosa, a vascular pathogen of grapevines, inactivation of the FHA-like protein (HxfA) led to hypervirulence which suggests that haemagglutinins mediate contact between bacterial cells, resulting in formation of colonies and biofilms within xylem vessels [51].

Some of the larger-scale genomic differences among the four Pae strains appeared to be associated with plasmids and all four strains varied in their plasmid complement. It is apparent, for example, that E-Pae has acquired a suite of conjugal transfer genes with similarity to Pto DC3000 plasmids which are absent from I-Pae. Since plasmids are inherently transferable from one bacterial cell to another, even crossing between species, they can allow bacteria to adapt to new environments, possibly resulting in changes in virulence and fitness through horizontal gene transfer [52]. Thus, plasmids are almost certainly an important factor enabling rapid evolutionary change in Pae. The observed variation among Pae strains in terms of plasmids, genes and genetic pathways is probably facilitated by the numerous phage and mobile genetic elements in their genomes [52], [53]. In fact, the abundance of insertion sequence (IS) elements in the genome of E-Pae was the reason why it was technically not feasible to take its sequence assembly to closure.

Through our comparative genome analysis we sought information on the evolution and likely origin of E-Pae on European horse chestnut. The degree of divergence between E-Pae and I-Pae was found to be very low (about 0.05% across aligned genomic sequences) indicating that they shared a recent common ancestor. However, the near identity among the three E-Pae strains from diverse locations in Britain (only one or two nucleotide differences across 3 Mbp) indicates that their common ancestry is much more recent, and consistent with a single introduction within the last few years. This serves to highlight the environmental risks posed by the spread of exotic plant pathogens into new geographical locations. In contrast to our findings for strains from Britain, REP-PCR profiles have been reported to vary among approximately 50 Pae strains isolated from diseased European horse chestnut in Belgium [54]. Since Pseudomonas genomes do not contain copies of the repetitive sequences from which the REP-PCR primers were designed, this profiling technique is analogous to using arbitrary or random primers [55], and it is not known whether the sequences amplified were chromosomal or from plasmids. Thus, it is as yet unclear whether E-Pae strains from outside Britain exhibit greater genetic variation; if they do it would indicate that they have a longer history of divergence. It also remains uncertain whether E-Pae originates from India. More information on the geographic origin and routes of spread of E-Pae could be elucidated by phylogenetic analyses of a broad range of Pae strains from Europe, comparing the genetic variability of these strains with newly collected Pae strains from Indian horse chestnut in India.

This study demonstrates the value of genome-wide sequence data for surveying intra-pathovar genetic variation among phytopathogenic strains that were indistinguishable using existing molecular markers. The comparative genomics approach has enabled us to identify SNPs and other variable regions in Pae that offer candidate molecular markers for large scale phylogenetic analyses. Also, the presence of common regions in the genomes of geographically distinct E-Pae strains suggests that these regions may be highly conserved and may thus provide appropriate loci for the development of diagnostic markers that can differentiate E-Pae and I-Pae. Such tools are needed to support phytosanitary measures aimed at preventing the introduction of Pae to new geographical areas, such as North America where it could present a serious threat to various native Aesculus spp.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

E-Pae strain 2250 was isolated from necrotic phloem in the stem of a diseased horse chestnut near Pitlochry, Perthshire, Scotland, in 2008. E-Pae strain P6617 was isolated from a diseased horse chestnut in Glasgow, Scotland in 2006, and E-Pae strain P6623 was isolated from a diseased horse chestnut near Farnham, Surrey, England in 2006. Prior to sequencing, the pathogenicity of E-Pae 2250 was confirmed by inoculating a cell suspension onto wounded horse chestnut shoots and observing subsequent development of lesions. I-Pae (NCPPB3681; also known as 0893_23 in the USA, D. Cooksey, Pers. Comm.) was isolated from a leaf lesion on Indian horse chestnut in 1969 in a temperate region of Northern India [8].

For E-Pae, initial isolations were made on nutrient agar amended with 5% w/v sucrose, crystal violet (2 mg/L) and Actidione (cycloheximide) (50 ng/L), to inhibit fungal growth and incubated at room temperature. Growth was visualized under UV light for blue fluorescence, and, if positive, fluorescent isolated bacterial colonies were subsequently streaked on to King's medium B [56]. Gram testing was done by adding a drop of 3% w/v aqueous KOH to a sub-sample of the colony on a microscope slide and confirming the presence of Gram negative isolates by an observed increase in viscosity. Isolates were stored at -80°C in Protect Bacterial Preservers (Technical Service Consultants Limited, Lancs, UK). To identify the strains, DNA was extracted and PCR carried out using the primer pair gyrB-F and gyrB-R [17]. The PCR product was sequenced and aligned with other bacterial gyrase B gene sequences available in GenBank and identified as Pae based on 100% similarity with a 470 bp gyrase B gene fragment of P. syringae pv. aesculi strain 0893-23 (DQ072677; I-Pae) isolated from A. indica in India [9].

Library preparation and Illumina sequencing

DNA was extracted from I-Pae and E-Pae strains P6617 and P6623 grown in nutrient broth using the Puregene Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. For E-Pae strain 2250, DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). A library for Illumina Paired-End sequencing was prepared from 5 mg DNA using a Paired-End DNA Sample Prep Kit (Pe-102-1001, Illumina, Inc., Cambridge, UK). Sample DNA concentration was measured using Nanodrop and concentrations were equalized amongst the samples. Finally, DNA integrity was assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was fragmented by nebulisation for 6 min at a pressure of 32 psi. For end-repair and phosphorylation, sheared DNA was purified using QIAquick Nucleotide Removal Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The end repaired DNA was A-tailed and adaptors were ligated according to manufacturer's instructions. Size fractionation and purification of ligation products were performed using a 5% polyacrylamide gel run in TBE at 180 V for 120 min. Gel slices were cut containing DNA in the 10 to 500 bp range. DNA was then extracted using 0.3 M sodium acetate and 2 mM EDTA [pH 8.0] followed by ethanol precipitation. Using 18 PCR cycles with primer PE1.0 and PE2.0 supplied by Illumina, 5′ adaptor extension and enrichment of the library were performed. The library was finally purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit and adjusted to a concentration of 10 nM in 0.1% Tween. The stock was kept at −20°C until used. We generated 9.66 million, 11.13 million, 10.56 million and 8.86 million usable pairs of 36-nucleotide reads from genomic DNA of the four strains of Pae using the Genome Analyzer II (Illumina). This represents approximately 116, 133, 127, 106 X coverage of a 6 Mb genome (the expected size, based on previously sequenced P. syringae pathovars).

Whole-genome assembly

We assembled the E-Pae strain 2250 and I-Pae Illumina datasets de novo (i.e. without using a reference genome) using Velvet 0.7.48 [57]. Note that these sequence datasets probably also include sequence reads that originate from plasmids as well as from the chromosome. For assembly of the 17.7 million E-Pae Illumina paired reads, we used Velvet hash-length = 27 and coverage cut-off = 5. For assembly of the 19.3 million I-Pae Illumina paired reads, we used Velvet hash-length = 21 and coverage cut-off = 4. The different parameter values used for each strain yielded the best balance of contiguity and accuracy for their respective datasets. We used the FgenesB pipeline to predict protein-coding genes. Quality control procedures for genome assemblies are described in Text S1. The genome assemblies have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers ACXS00000000 (I-Pae) and ACXT00000000 (E-Pae).

Alignment of Illumina reads against a reference sequence

We used the Mapping with Alignment Qualities (MAQ) package [58] version 0.6.8.

Detection of genes present and absent based on alignment to a reference sequence

We aligned the complete set of Illumina sequence reads for E-Pae 2250 and I-Pae against their respective de novo genome assemblies using MAQ (using the default parameter settings). For E-Pae, 16883015 /17726652 (95%) of the sequence reads aligned and for I-Pae, 8074128/19322678 (93.5%) of the sequence reads aligned. The unassembled portion of each genome was largely comprised of repeated sequences, such as tRNA and rRNA genes and transposable elements. The Illumina sequence reads are likely to represent the entire genomes of E-Pae and I-Pae given their high depth of coverage. This assumption is supported by a recent study of the de novo assembly of the Psy B728a genome using short sequence reads [59]. Therefore, we based our inferences of gene-presence/absence in E-Pae and I-Pae on alignments of the unassembled sequence reads as well as comparison of the de novo genome assemblies against each other and against previously published reference genome sequences.

After aligning Illumina reads against the reference sequence of Pph 1448A, we would expect that genes that are conserved between Pph 1448A and Pae should be covered by Illumina reads over most or all of their length. If this proposition is true, then we can identify those Pph 1448A genes that are not conserved in Pae on the basis of their lack of coverage by Illumina reads. We tested the reliability of this approach using a set of 683 Pph 1448A genes that are highly conserved in Pto DC3000 and Psy B728a (and therefore we expect that most are also conserved in E-Pae). These genes are listed in File S1. Of these 683 genes, 679 (99.41%) were covered by E-Pae Illumina reads over at least 85% of their length. Only one gene was less than 50% covered by E-Pae Illumina reads. Similarly, 677 (99.12%) of the highly conserved genes were at least 85% covered by I-Pae Illumina reads.

Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from Illumina data

We used MAQ alignments of Illumina sequence reads versus the E-Pae genome assembly to detect SNPs. We only considered the 2,698,682 nucleotides in the E-Pae assembly for which there was at least 40X depth of coverage by Illumina reads from each of the four Pae datasets and there was at least 95% consensus between the aligned reads. We considered a SNP to be present at a given site if at least 95% of the aligned reads at that site consistently call a different nucleotide from that in the reference sequence. The remainder of the genome was considered to be ambiguous, and we made no attempt to determine whether SNPs were present or absent there.

Determining the phylogenetic position of Pae within P. syringae

To investigate the position of Pae within the evolutionary radiation of P. syringae pathovars, we used the partial sequences of seven housekeeping genes (acnB, fruK, gapA, gltA, gyrB, pgi and rpoD) analyzed in [17]. We added the sequences from the four Pae isolates, and those from P. syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A [13] and P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528 [14], to those from the 60 strains examined by [17]. The concatenated sequences yielded an alignment with 3,129 sites that could be compared among all strains. Where there were identical sequences from multiple strains assigned to the same pathovar, only one sequence was retained. The phylogenetic relationships among these sequences were estimated using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method implemented in MrBayes v3.1.2 [60], run for 2,000,000 generations with a burn-in time of 500,000. The general time reversible model of nucleotide substitution was used, with gamma-distributed among-site rate variation, and a proportion of invariant sites. The tree was rooted according to [17].

Analysis of plasmid sizes

Agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out as described by [33] to compare the number and size of native plasmids present within the genomes of each of the four Pae strains; P. syringae pv. phaseolicola strain 1448A was included for comparison. M represents marker plasmids from Escherichia coli strain 39R861 [61].

Sequence similarity searches

BLAST [62] using a threshold of 1e-10 was used for sequence similarity searches. For Pfam searches, the Pfam ‘gathering thresholds’ was used as determined by the Pfam annotators.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Conservation of predicted Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) components in E- Pae and I-Pae.


(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S2.

Putative Type VI Secretion system substrates in I-Pae and their orthologues in E-Pae.


(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S3.

Repertoires of type III secretion system (T3SS) effectors in E-Pae and I-Pae.


(0.05 MB DOC)

Figure S1.

Pae genes implicated in nitric oxide metabolism that are not conserved in previously sequenced P. syringae genomes. Shown is a 3 kb contig on the E-Pae genome with positions and FgenesB automatic gene predictions and annotations. Regions of sequence identity (based on blastn [16] searches with a significance threshold of 1e-10) to I-Pae and to previously sequenced P. syringae genomes are indicated by horizontal bars.


(0.09 MB PPT)

Figure S2.

I-Pae encodes a microcin biosynthesis pathway that is absent from E-Pae and from previously sequenced P. syringae genomes. Shown is a 7 kb contig on the I-Pae genome with positions and FgenesB automatic gene predictions and annotations. Regions of sequence identity (based on blastn [16] searches with a significance threshold of 1e-10) to E-Pae and to previously sequenced P. syringae genomes are indicated by horizontal bars. Full details of the predicted genes are described in SUPPORTING INFORMATION.


(0.10 MB PPT)

Figure S3.

E-Pae and I-Pae encode highly divergent filamentous hemagglutinin-like (FHA) proteins. We used MAFFT [17] to align the predicted Pae FHA protein sequences against similar proteins recovered from the NCBI Proteins database via blastp searches. We generated a phylogenetic tree using the Neighbour Joining method implemented by Quicktree [18].


(0.13 MB PPT)

File S1.

Set of 683 Pph 1448A genes that are highly conserved in Pto DC3000 and Psy B728a.


(0.09 MB DOC)

Text S1.

Text for supporting information.


(0.04 MB DOC)


We thank Grace MacAskill, Heather Steele, Joan Rose and Joan Webber for isolation of E-Pae strains P6617 and P6623. We wish to acknowledge the contribution of The Gene Pool, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh for the Illumina sequencing of E-Pae strain 2250.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SG DJS BEL JEC PMS RWJ. Performed the experiments: BEL FD HL EH PMS. Analyzed the data: SG DJS BEL FD JEC SB MB PMS RWJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SG DA RT SK. Wrote the paper: SG DJS BEL JEC PMS RWJ.


  1. 1. Strange RN, Scott PR (2005) Plant disease: a threat to global food security. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43: 83–116.
  2. 2. Brasier CM (2008) The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol 57: 792–808.
  3. 3. Ahmed N (2009) A flood of microbial genomes-do we need more? PLoS One 4: e5831.
  4. 4. Snyder LA, Loman N, Pallen MJ, Penn CW (2009) Next-generation sequencing—the promise and perils of charting the great microbial unknown. Microb Ecol 57: 1–3.
  5. 5. Webber JF, Parkinson NM, Rose J, Stanford H, Cook RTA, et al. (2008) Isolation and identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi causing bleeding canker of horse chestnut in the UK. Plant Pathol New Dis Rep 15: 1.
  6. 6. Green S, Laue B, Fossdal CG, A'Hara SW, Cottrell JE (2009) Infection of horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) by Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi and its detection by quantitative real-time PCR. Plant Pathol 58: 731–744.
  7. 7. Forestry Commission (2008) Report on the national survey to assess the presence of bleeding canker of horse chestnut trees in Great Britain. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, UK.
  8. 8. Durgapal JC (1971) A preliminary note on some bacterial diseases of temperate plants in India. Indian Phytopath 24: 392–395.
  9. 9. Durgapal JC, Singh B (1980) Taxonomy of pseudomonads pathogenic to horse-chestnut, wild fig and wild cherry in India. Indian Phytopath 33: 533–535.
  10. 10. Schmidt O, Dujesiefken D, Stobbe H, Moreth U, Kehr R, et al. (2008) Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi associated with horse chestnut bleeding canker in Germany. Forest Pathol 38: 124–128.
  11. 11. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, et al. (2003) The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 10181–10186.
  12. 12. Feil H, Feil WS, Chain P, Larimer F, DiBartolo G, et al. (2005) Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 11064-110? 69:
  13. 13. Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Jackson RW, Selengut J, Dodson R, et al. (2005) Whole-genome sequence analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A reveals divergence among pathovars in genes involved in virulence and transposition. J Bacteriol 187: 6488–6498.
  14. 14. Studholme DJ, Gimenez Ibanez S, Maclean D, Dangl JL, Chang JH, et al. (2009) A draft genome sequence and functional screen reveals the repertoire of type III secreted proteins of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tabaci 11528. BMC Genomics 10: 395.
  15. 15. Reinhardt JA, Baltrus DA, Nishimura MT, Jeck WR, Jones CD, et al. (2009) De novo assembly using low-coverage short read sequence data from the rice pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae. Genome Res 19: 294–305.
  16. 16. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, et al. (2008) Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456: 53–59.
  17. 17. Sarkar SF, Guttman DS (2004) Evolution of the core genome of Pseudomonas syringae, a highly clonal, endemic plant pathogen. Appl Environ Microb 70: 1999–2012.
  18. 18. Gardan L, Shafik H, Belouin S, Broch R, Grimont F, et al. (1999) DNA relatedness among the pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and description of Pseudomonas tremae sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (ex Sutic and Dowson 1959). Int J Syst Bacteriol 49: 469–478.
  19. 19. Perez-Losada M, Crandall KA, Zenilman J, Viscidi RP (2007) Temporal trends in gonococcal population genetics in a high prevalence urban community. Infect Genet Evol 7: 271–278.
  20. 20. Falush D, Kraft C, Taylor NS, Correa P, Fox JD (2001) Recombination and mutation during long-term gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori: Estimates of clock rates, recombination size, and minimal age. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 15056–15061.
  21. 21. Wilson DJ, Gabriel E, Leatherbarrow AJH, Cheesbrough J, Gee S (2009) Rapid evolution and the importance of recombination to the gastroenteric pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Mol Biol Evol 26: 385–397.
  22. 22. Harwood CS, Parales RE (1996) The β-ketoadipate pathway and the biology of self-identity. Annu Rev Microbiol 50: 553–590.
  23. 23. Helmick RA, Fletcher AE, Gardner AM, Gessner CR, Hvitved AN, et al. (2005) Imidazole antibiotics inhibit the nitric oxide dioxygenase function of microbial flavohemoglobin. Antimicrob Agents Ch 49: 1837–1843.
  24. 24. Delledonne M, Xia Y, Dixon RA, Lamb C (1998) Nitric oxide functions as a signal in plant disease resistance. Nature 394: 585–588.
  25. 25. D'Autréaux B, Tucker N, Spiro S, Dixon R (2008) Characterization of the nitric oxide-reactive transcriptional activator NorR. Methods Enzymol 437: 235–251.
  26. 26. Schwarzenbacher R, Stenner-Liewen F, Liewen H, Robinson H, Yuan H (2004) Structure of the Chlamydia protein CADD reveals a redox enzyme that modulates host cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem 279: 29320–29324.
  27. 27. Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S, Newman L, Hoffman A (2009) Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees. Appl Environ Microb 75: 748–757.
  28. 28. Gunasekaran P, Karunakaran T, Cami B, Mukundan AG, Preziosi L, Baratti J (1990) Cloning and sequencing of the sacA gene: characterization of a sucrase from Zymomonas mobilis. J Bacteriol 172: 6727–6735.
  29. 29. Hardesty C, Ferran C, DiRienzo JM (1991) Plasmid-mediated sucrose metabolism in Escherichia coli: characterization of scrY, the structural gene for a phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sucrose phosphotransferase system outer membrane porin. J Bacteriol 173: 449–456.
  30. 30. Killiny N, Almeida RP (2009) Xylella fastidiosa afimbrial adhesins mediate cell transmission to plants by leafhopper vectors. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 521–528.
  31. 31. Medini D, Donati C, Tettelin H, Masignani V, Rappuoli R (2005) The microbial pan-genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 589–594.
  32. 32. Almeida NF, Yan S, Lindeberg M, Studholme DJ, Schneider DJ, et al. (2009) A draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato T1 reveals a type III effector repertoire significantly divergent from that of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22: 52–62.
  33. 33. Jackson RW, Athanassopoulos E, Tsiamis G, Mansfield JW, Sesma A (1999) Identification of a pathogenicity island, which contains genes for virulence and avirulence, on a large native plasmid in the bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar phaseolicola. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 10875–10880.
  34. 34. Kazempour MN, Kamran E, Taleshi SS (2006) An identification of the bacterial agents of mulberry leaf blight, Guilan Province. Iran J Agricul Sci 37: 849–856.
  35. 35. Ogimi C, Higuchi H (1981) Bacterial gall of Yamamomo (Myrica rubra Z.) caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. myricae pv. nov. Ann Phytopath Soc Japan 47: 443–448.
  36. 36. Kennelly MM, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A, Ramos C, Sundin GW (2007) Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees. Progress towards understanding and control. Plant Dis 91: 4–16.
  37. 37. Perez-Martinez I, Zhao Y, Murillo J, Sundin GW, Ramos C (2008) Global genomic analysis of Pseudomonas savastanoi plasmids. J Bacteriol 190: 625–635.
  38. 38. Kasai D, Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M (2007) Degradation of 3-O-methylgallate in Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 by pathways involving protocatechuate 4,5-dioxygenase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 274: 323–328.
  39. 39. Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M (2007) Genetic and biochemical investigations on bacterial catabolic pathways for lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Biosci Biotech Bioch 71: 1–15.
  40. 40. Nichols NN, Harwood CS (1995) Repression of 4-hydroxybenzoate transport and degradation by benzoate: a new layer of regulatory control in the Pseudomonas putida β-ketoadipate pathway. J Bacteriol 177: 7033–7040.
  41. 41. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (1997) Physiology of Woody Plants, Second Edition. Academic Press. pp. 160–167.
  42. 42. Raymond KN, Dertz EA, Kim SS (2003) Enterobactin: an archetype for microbial iron transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3584–3588.
  43. 43. Bode HB (2009) Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13: 224–230.
  44. 44. Bhatt A, Molle V, Besra GS, Jacobs W Jr (2007) The Mycobacterium tuberculosis FAS-II condensing enzymes: their role in mycolic acid biosynthesis, acid-fastness, pathogenesis and in future drug development. Mol Microbiol 64: 1442–1454.
  45. 45. Esau K (1965) Plant Anatomy, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc.. pp. 270–307.
  46. 46. McGuirk P, Johnson PA, Ryan EJ, Mills KH (2000) Filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxin from Bordetella pertussis modulate immune responses to unrelated antigens. J Infect Dis 182: 1286–1289.
  47. 47. McGuirk P, Mills KH (2002) Pathogen-specific regulatory T cells provoke a shift in the Th1/Th2 paradigm in immunity to infectious diseases. Trends Immunol 23: 450–455.
  48. 48. Inatsuka CS, Julio SM, Cotter PA (2005) Bordetella filamentous hemagglutinin plays a critical role in immunomodulation, suggesting a mechanism for host specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 18578–18583.
  49. 49. Rojas CM, Ham JH, Deng WL, Doyle JJ, Collmer A (2002) HecA, a member of a class of adhesins produced by diverse pathogenic bacteria, contributes to the attachment, aggregation, epidermal cell killing, and virulence phenotypes of Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16 on Nicotiana clevelandii seedlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13142–13147.
  50. 50. Das A, Rangaraj N, Sonti RV (2009) Multiple adhesin-like functions of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae are involved in promoting leaf attachment, entry, and virulence on rice. Mol Plant Microbe In 22: 73–85.
  51. 51. Guilhabert MR, Kirkpatrick BC (2005) Identification of Xylella fastidiosa antivirulence genes: hemagglutinin adhesins contribute a biofilm maturation to X. fastidiosa and colonization and attenuate virulence. Mol Plant Microbe Int 18: 856–868.
  52. 52. Sundin GW (2007) Genomic insights into the contribution of phytopathogenic bacterial plasmids to the evolutionary history of their hosts. Annu Rev of Phytopathol 45: 129–151.
  53. 53. Landgraf A, Weingart H, Tsiamis G, Boch J (2006) Different versions of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 exist due to the activity of an effector transposon. Mol Plant Pathol 7: 355–364.
  54. 54. Bultreys A, Gheysen I, Planchon V (2008) Characterization of Pseudomonas syringae strains isolated from diseased horse-chestnut trees in Belgium. In: Fatmi MB, Collmer A, Iacobellis NS, Mansfield JW, Murillo J,, et al., editors. Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars and Related Pathogens – Identification, Epidemiology and Genomics, Eds. Springer Netherlands. pp. 283–293.
  55. 55. Wilson LA, Sharp PM (2006) Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC) sequences in Escherichia coli: evolution and implications for ERIC-PCR. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1156–1168.
  56. 56. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44: 301–307.
  57. 57. Zerbino DR, Birney E (2008) Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18: 821–829.
  58. 58. Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R (2008) Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res 18: 1851–1858.
  59. 59. Farrer RA, Kemen E, Jones JDG, Studholme DJ (2009) De novo assembly of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a genome using Illumina/Solexa short sequence reads. FEMS Microbiol Lett 291: 103–111.
  60. 60. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck , JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
  61. 61. Sambrook , J , Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual.1659. ISBN 0-87969-309-6.
  62. 62. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.