Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina

Abstract

Background

Living birds possess a unique heterogeneous pulmonary system composed of a rigid, dorsally-anchored lung and several compliant air sacs that operate as bellows, driving inspired air through the lung. Evidence from the fossil record for the origin and evolution of this system is extremely limited, because lungs do not fossilize and because the bellow-like air sacs in living birds only rarely penetrate (pneumatize) skeletal bone and thus leave a record of their presence.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We describe a new predatory dinosaur from Upper Cretaceous rocks in Argentina, Aerosteon riocoloradensis gen. et sp. nov., that exhibits extreme pneumatization of skeletal bone, including pneumatic hollowing of the furcula and ilium. In living birds, these two bones are pneumatized by diverticulae of air sacs (clavicular, abdominal) that are involved in pulmonary ventilation. We also describe several pneumatized gastralia (“stomach ribs”), which suggest that diverticulae of the air sac system were present in surface tissues of the thorax.

Conclusions/Significance

We present a four-phase model for the evolution of avian air sacs and costosternal-driven lung ventilation based on the known fossil record of theropod dinosaurs and osteological correlates in extant birds:

(1) Phase I—Elaboration of paraxial cervical air sacs in basal theropods no later than the earliest Late Triassic.

(2) Phase II—Differentiation of avian ventilatory air sacs, including both cranial (clavicular air sac) and caudal (abdominal air sac) divisions, in basal tetanurans during the Jurassic. A heterogeneous respiratory tract with compliant air sacs, in turn, suggests the presence of rigid, dorsally attached lungs with flow-through ventilation.

(3) Phase III—Evolution of a primitive costosternal pump in maniraptoriform theropods before the close of the Jurassic.

(4) Phase IV—Evolution of an advanced costosternal pump in maniraptoran theropods before the close of the Jurassic.

In addition, we conclude:

(5) The advent of avian unidirectional lung ventilation is not possible to pinpoint, as osteological correlates have yet to be identified for uni- or bidirectional lung ventilation.

(6) The origin and evolution of avian air sacs may have been driven by one or more of the following three factors: flow-through lung ventilation, locomotory balance, and/or thermal regulation.

Introduction

The respiratory tract of birds has an elaborate series of pneumatic (air-filled) outgrowths that include sinuses within the head and neck and air sacs within the thorax (Figure 1). Sinuses often invade the bones enclosing the nasal cavity (paranasal sinuses) and ear region (paratympanic sinuses), forming membrane-lined, air-filled internal spaces. Air sacs also invade bone in the postcranial skeleton, although many remain free of bone so they can function as compliant bellows, shunting inspired air along a path through a pair of rigid lungs [1][4].

thumbnail
Figure 1. Cranial sinus and postcranial air sac systems in birds.

All pneumatic spaces are paired except the clavicular air sac, and the lungs are shaded. Abbreviations: aas, abdominal air sac; atas, anterior thoracic air sac; cas, cervical air sac; clas, clavicular air sac; hd, humeral diverticulum of the clavicular air sac; lu, lung; pns, paranasal sinus; ptas, posterior thoracic air sac; pts, paratympanic sinus; t, trachea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g001

In this paper, we describe a new large-bodied theropod from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina, Aerosteon riocoloradensis gen. et sp. nov., characterized by cranial and postcranial bones that are exceptionally pneumatic. Some of its postcranial bones show pneumatic hollowing that can be linked to intrathoracic air sacs that are directly involved in lung ventilation. As a result of an extraordinary level of pneumatization, as well as the excellent state of preservation of much of the axial column and girdles, Aerosteon helps to constrain hypotheses for the evolution of avian-style respiration.

The new theropod is particularly interesting for another reason; it represents a previously unrecorded lineage of large-bodied predator in the early Late Cretaceous (Santonian, ca. 84 Ma) of South America. Most large-bodied Cretaceous theropods on southern continents (South America, Africa, Madagascar, India) pertain to one of three distinctive and contemporary clades: abelisaurids [5][7], spinosaurids [8], [9], or carcharodontosaurids [10][12]. This predatory triumvirate persisted for millions of years on both South America and Africa [13]. Although initially thought to be a late-surviving carcharodontosaurid [14], Aerosteon preserves cranial bones that bear none of the distinguishing features of carcharodontosaurids [13], [15]. Rather, Aerosteon represents a distinctive basal tetanuran lineage that has survived into the Late Cretaceous on South America and is possibly linked to the allosauroid radiation of the Jurassic.

The purpose of the present paper is not to determine the precise phylogenetic position of Aerosteon but rather to describe its most salient features, outline the range of its remarkable pneumatic spaces, and discuss their relevance to understanding the early evolution of avian air sacs and lung ventilation.

Avian Air Sacs

Avian air sacs arise directly from the lungs (Figure 1) and can be divided into cranial and caudal divisions [1][4], [16][22]. Within the cranial division, the paired cervical air sacs are not ventilated during respiration and often invade the centrum and neural arches of cervical and anterior thoracic vertebrae. The primary role of the cervical air sacs seems to be the reduction of bone mass, as shown by quantitative comparison of the extent of pneumatic hollowing of skeletal bone in volant and nonvolant birds [22].

The remaining air sacs are involved in lung ventilation and include the median clavicular air sac, the paired anterior and posterior thoracic air sacs, and the paired abdominal air sacs (Figure 1). In contrast to cervical air sacs, these operate as bellows, shunting inspired air along a unidirectional pathway through the lungs—a respiratory pattern unique to birds [1][4]. Whereas the anterior and posterior thoracic air sacs almost never invade bone in living birds, the clavicular and abdominal air sacs more commonly have diverticulae that invade axial or appendicular bone [16][22]. The intrathoracic location and form of these pneumatic invasions in living birds constitutes the available comparative evidence to allow their identification in fossils [23]. With the exception of evidence presented below, however, pneumatic invasion of appendicular skeletal bone within the thorax has not been reported on conclusive evidence outside crown birds (Neornithes).

Fossil Evidence

Cervical Air Sacs.

The cervical air sacs lie alongside the vertebral column in living birds and sometimes invade the vertebrae and ribs via pneumatopores of variable size. Invaginated pneumatic spaces that enter the lateral aspect of the centra, called pleurocoels, have been traced back in the fossil record to the Late Jurassic bird Archaeopteryx [23][25], to various saurischian dinosaurs [23], [26], [27], pterosaurs [23], [28], [29], and possibly to even more primitive, crocodilian relatives in the Triassic [30]. Although doubt was cast recently on the use of fossae as evidence of pneumaticity in basal archosaurs [31], a new basal suchian (distant crocodilian relative) has just been described with cervical pleurocoels [32].

For more than a century, paleontologists have agreed on the existence of cervical air sacs, or some comparable pneumatic structure, in saurischian dinosaurs on the basis of pleurocoels which closely resemble those in some living birds. The longstanding question is the fossil record of noncervical air sacs—sacs that are involved in avian lung ventilation.

Ventilatory Air Sacs.

Ventilatory air sacs, unfortunately, are the least likely to leave evidence of their presence in skeletal bone. Paleontologists and comparative anatomists, as a result, have focused on axial pneumaticity, and opinion has split as to the meaning of observed patterns. In extant birds, pneumatic invasion by cervical air sacs is usually restricted to the cervical and anterior thoracic vertebrae and their respective ribs [1], [16][22]. The posterior thoracic, synsacral, and caudal vertebrae, in contrast, are pneumatized by diverticulae extending directly from the lung or from abdominal air sacs [1], [16], [19], [21], [22]. Some authors have concluded, therefore, that the lung and abdominal air sacs must also be responsible for pneumaticity in the posterior half of the axial column in nonavian dinosaurs and, on this basis, have packed the thoracic cavity of theropods with a full complement of avian ventilatory air sacs [33]. An opposing view is that the continuous series of pleurocoels observed in many nonavian dinosaurs suggests that the nonventilatory, paraxial cervical air sacs extended posteriorly along the column [26], [34].

We are inclined to support the latter, more conservative interpretation that pleurocoels in nonavian dinosaurs are a product of paraxial cervical air sacs and provide, at best, ambiguous evidence for intrathoracic ventilatory air sacs. First, pleurocoels are rare in birds, and no living bird has an unbroken cervical-to-caudal series of pleurocoels as occurs in some nonavian dinosaurs, including the one we describe below [31]. As Wedel [26] has underscored, pleurocoels extend posteriorly in the axial column of saurischian dinosaurs to a variable extent, but neither adults nor juveniles of any species show an apneumatic gap. Allotting an unbroken series of pleurocoels of graded form, as in the case we describe below, to three different pneumatic sources (cervical air sacs, lung diverticulae, abdominal air sacs) is difficult to defend. Drawing a direct analogy based on birds for the source(s) of pneumaticity in the posterior axial column in nonavian dinosaurs [22], [31], [33], thus, is problematic.

Second, cervical air sacs have been observed extending to the posterior end of the vertebral column in birds. Several authors have described cervical air sacs extending posteriorly beyond the abdominal air sacs in the ostrich (Struthio camelus) [21], [36]. Ratites have relatively smaller abdominal sacs than in other birds and, as nonvolant basal avians, serve as better analogs for nonavian saurischians than volant neognaths [37].

Finally, the posterior portion of the avian axial skeleton is completely transformed by extensive coossification of vertebrae and girdle bone and by posterolateral rotation of the pubes away from the midline, which allows unobstructed distal extension of the viscera and abdominal air sac under the synsacrum and caudal vertebrae. The pelvic space in nonavian saurischians, in contrast, is not nearly as open and continuous with the thoracic cavity, offering comparably less space for these air sacs [37].

More conclusive evidence of intrathoracic ventilatory air sacs in fossils, in sum, will require an osteological signature of pneumatic structures in nonaxial (appendicular) bones, which that cannot be dismissed as an elaboration of the paraxial cervical air sacs. We now turn attention to previous reports of such pneumaticity in the appendicular skeleton of nonavian dinosaurs.

Previous Reports of Appendicular Pneumaticity.

Appendicular pneumaticity in nonavian dinosaurs is poorly documented. An ilium of the Middle Jurassic theropod Piatnitzkysaurus was shown with two small foramina, one above the pubic peduncle and another above the acetabulum [38: fig. 22]. These small foramina were described as pneumatic and associated with internal space and likened to other supposedly pneumatic foramina in the femur, tibia and metatarsals. The small foramen figured on the shaft of the tibia has elsewhere been described as a neurovascular foramen. Were such long bones also pneumatic, this would constitute an extraordinary condition, as none of the limb bones in Archaeopteryx nor those in other basal avians outside Ornithothoraces (Enantiornithes + Euornithes) has ever been shown to be pneumatic.

A deep depression on the brevis shelf on an ilium of the Cretaceous carcharodontosaurid theropod Mapusaurus, likewise, was labeled “pneumatic diverticulae” of the ilium of [12: fig 26]. The structure, however, was described in the text as a site of origin of powerful hind limb retractor musculature. Whether the ilium in Mapusaurus is actually pneumatized, however, cannot be determined on available information.

Recently, the furcula in the Early Cretaceous dromaeosaurid Buitreraptor was described as “pneumatic” with “trabeculae spanning its interior” [39:1008]. Most of the interior of the bone is hollowed, which does suggest pneumatic invasion, although the pair of potential pneumatopores near the midline are particularly small (P. Makovicky, pers. comm.).

“Cancellous” bone was described in the ilia of the titanosaurs Epachthosaurus [40] and Lirainosaurus [41], although no further claim was made regarding its pneumatic status. The titanosauriform Euhelopus also has a bone texture of larger cells that may be pneumatic (J. Wilson, personal observation). At present there are no reports of appendicular bones among sauropodomorphs with pneumatopores that lead to bone texture than is demonstrably pneumatic.

In sum, the evidence currently documenting the presence of nonaxial pneumatic structures in nonavian dinosaurs is poorly established. Several years ago, we reported the pneumatic spaces in the furcula and ilium described below [14]. The pneumatic status of these and other structures we describe below is quite evident and will add important new evidence for the identity and distribution of air sacs in nonavian theropods.

Methods

Preparation

The holotypic and referred specimens were prepared using pin vice, pneumatic air scribe, and air abrasive. The white-colored bones are embedded in a fine-grained, poorly sorted, hematitic siltstone matrix that in places was very hard. To reduce color distractions in photographic images between the white bone and red-brown matrix, some bones were molded and cast in matt grey-colored casting epoxy.

Imaging

Computed tomography of the furcula, gastral elements, and ilium was undertaken to observe internal pneumatic spaces using a Philips Brilliance 64-slice scanner at 80 Kv in the University of Chicago Hospitals.

Terminology

We employed traditional, or “Romerian,” anatomical and directional terms over veterinarian alternatives [42] and followed recent recommendations regarding the identification of vertebral laminae [43]. “Anterior” and “posterior,” for example, are used as directional terms rather than the veterinarian alternatives “rostral” or “cranial” and “caudal,” except when referring to cranial and caudal air sac divisions in birds.

Institutional abbreviations:

FMNHField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
LHLas Hoyas collection, Museo de Cuenca, Cuenca, Spain.
MCNAMuseo de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas (J. C. Moyano) de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina.
MNNMuséum National du Niger, Niamey, République de Niger.

CSV
Download CSV

Results

Systematic Paleontology

Systematic hierarchy:

Dinosauria Owen, 1842

Theropoda Marsh, 1881

Tetanurae Gauthier, 1986

Allosauroidea Marsh, 1878

Aerosteon gen. nov.

Etymology.

Aeros, air (Greek); osteon, bone (Greek). Named for the extreme development of pneumatic spaces in skeletal bone.

Type Species.

Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Aerosteon riocoloradensis sp. nov.

Figures 211, 12A, 1316

thumbnail
Figure 2. Tooth of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Isolated crown from the maxillary or dentary series (MCNA-PV-3137; cast). (A)-Side view of crown. (B)-Enlarged view of crown tip. Scale bars equal 1 cm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Postorbital of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Right postorbital (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in right lateral (A), medial (B), anterior (C), posterior (D), and dorsal (E) views. Scale bar equals 5 cm. Abbreviations: af, articular surface for the frontal; aj, articular surface for the jugal; als, articular surface for the laterosphenoid; asq, articular surface for the squamosal; oru, orbital rugosity; stf, supratemporal fossa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Quadrate of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Left quadrate (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral (A), medial (B), anterior (C), posterior (D), dorsal (E), and ventral (F) views. Scale bar equals 5 cm. Abbreviations: aqj, articular surface for the quadratojugal; asq, articular surface for the squamosal; co, condyle; he, head; pnec, pneumatocoel; qf, quadrate foramen.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g004

thumbnail
Figure 5. Anterior cervical vertebrae of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Atlas and cervical 3 centrum (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral view. (A)-Atlas. (B)-Cervical 3 centrum. Scale bars equal 5 cm. Abbreviations: ic, intercentrum; na, neural arch; pa, parapophysis; pl, pleurocoel; pnec, pneumatocoel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g005

thumbnail
Figure 6. Mid cervical vertebrae of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Cervical vertebrae 4 and 6 (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral view. (A)-Cervical 4. (B)-Cervical 6. Scale bar equals 5 cm. Abbreviations: pa, parapophysis; pl, pleurocoel; se, septum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. Anterior and mid dorsal vertebrae of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Dorsal vertebrae 1, 4 and 8 (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral view. (A)-Dorsal 1. (B)-Dorsal 4. (C)-Dorsal 8. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: pa, parapophysis; pl, pleurocoel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g007

thumbnail
Figure 8. Posterior dorsal vertebrae of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Dorsal vertebrae 11 and 14 (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral view. (A)-Dorsal 11. (B)-Dorsal 14. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: dipc, diapophyseal canal; hpo, hyposphene; pa, parapophysis; pl, pleurocoel; poz, postzygapophysis; prz, prezygapophysis; se, septum; tp, transverse process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g008

thumbnail
Figure 9. Caudal vertebrae of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Anterior and mid caudal centra (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral view. (A)-Anterior caudal centrum. (B)-Mid caudal centrum. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: ach, articular surface for a chevron; pl, pleurocoel; se, septum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g009

thumbnail
Figure 10. Gastralia of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Coossified medial gastral elements from anterior end of cuirass (MCNA-PV-3137). (A)-Coossified gastralia (cast) in ventral view. (B)-Stereopairs of the medial portion of one gastralium showing the pneumatopore and lumen inside the shaft in ventrolateral view. Scale bars equal 10 cm in A and 5 cm in B. Abbreviations: afl, anterior flange; l, left; mge, medial gastral element; pfl, posterior flange; pnec, pneumatocoel; pnep, pneumatopore; r, right; su, suture.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g010

thumbnail
Figure 11. Furcula of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Furcula (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in anterior (A) and posterior (B) views. Scale bar equals 10 cm. Abbreviations: ep, epicleideum; pnec, pneumatocoel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g011

thumbnail
Figure 12. Furcula of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis and magpie goose Anseranas semiplamata.

(A)-Stereopairs of the furcula of Aerosteon riocoloradensis (MCNA-PV-3137) in posterodorsal view. (B)-Stereopairs of the furcula of Anseranas semiplamata (FMNH 338808) in posterodorsal view. Scale bars equal 10 cm in A and 2 cm in B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g012

thumbnail
Figure 13. Ilium of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Left ilium (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral (A) and medial (B) views. Scale bar equals 20 cm. Abbreviations: bfo, brevis fossa; isped, ischial peduncle; poap, postacetabular process; pped, pubic peduncle; prap, preacetabular process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g013

thumbnail
Figure 14. Pneumatopores on the left ilium of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Detail views of the left ilium (MCNA-PV-3137). (A)-Pneumatopores on the base of the preacetabular process in lateral view. (B)-Pneumatopores on the central iliac blade in medial view. (C)-Stereopairs of the pubic peduncle in lateral view showing pneumatopore complex. (D)-Pneumatopores on the brevis fossa of the postacetabular process in ventral view; largest pneumatopore (4 cm in transverse diameter) opens posteriorly (to the right) just posterior to five smaller ventrally-facing pneumatopores (marked). A, B, and D are from a cast of MCNA-PV-3137 to reduce color distraction. Scale bars equal 5 cm in A and 10 cm in B, C and D. Arrows point to pneumatopores.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g014

thumbnail
Figure 15. Pubes of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

Pubes (MCNA-PV-3137; cast) in left lateral (A) and anterior (B) views. Scale bar equals 20 cm. Abbreviations: ac, acetabulum; f, foot; fe, fenestra; iped, iliac peduncle; isped, ischial peduncle; pvo, pelvic outlet.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g015

thumbnail
Figure 16. Summary of pneumatic features of the theropod Aerosteon riocoloradensis.

(A)-Silhouette reconstruction in left lateral view showing preserved bones of the holotype and referred specimens (MCNA-PV-3137-3139); body length approximately 9-10 m. (B)-Left quadrate in posterior view. (C)-Dorsal 14 in left lateral view with enlarged cross-sections of the neural spine and transverse process. (D)-Furcula in anterior view with sagittal cross-section. (E)-Cross-section of medial gastral element from the anterior end of the cuirass showing pneumatocoel. (F)-Left ilium in lateral view with enlarged cross-section of pubic peduncle. Scale bars equal 5 cm in B, 10 cm (3 cm for cross-sections) in C, 10 cm (same for cross-section) in D, 2 cm in E, and 20 cm (6 cm for cross-section) in F. Abbreviations: aqj, articular surface for the quadratojugal; asq, articular surface for the squamosal; bfo, brevis fossa; ca, canal; dipc, diapophyseal canal; ep, epicleideum; hpo, hyposphene; ilb, iliac blade; isped, ischial peduncle; ns, neural spine; pa, parapophysis; pc, pleurocoel; pnec, pneumatocoel; pned, pneumatic depression; pnep, pneumatopore; poap, postacetabular process; poz, postzygapophysis; pped, pubic peduncle; prap, preacetabular process; prz, prezygapophysis; ptfl, pterygoid flange; qc, quadrate condyles; qf, quadrate foramen; qh, quadrate head; se, septum; tp, transverse process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g016

Etymology.

riocolorado, Río Colorado (Spanish); ensis, place (Latin). Named for the site of discovery of the holotype.

Holotype.

MCNA-PV-3137; one maxillary or dentary crown, left prefrontal, right postorbital, left quadrate, posterior portion of the left pterygoid, right prearticular, partial or complete vertebrae including C1, C3, C4, C6, C8, D1, D4–11, D14, S2–5, CA1, one mid and distal caudal centrum, several cervical and dorsal ribs, gastralia, furcula, left scapulocoracoid, left ilium, and right and left pubes. The bones were found disarticulated but in close association over an area of 11 m2. The specimen is an immature individual with many open neurocentral sutures. The specimen, however, may have been approaching maturation, as indicated by fusion of the centrum and neural arch of several vertebrae and fusion of the coracoid and scapula. Body length is approximately 9–10 m, or roughly equivalent to the larger body size range for Allosaurus.

Type Locality.

Cañadon Amarillo (S 37.5°, W 70.5°), north of Cerro Colorado, 1 km north of the Río Colorado near the southern border of Mendoza Province, Argentina.

Horizon.

Anacleto Formation, Neuquén Group; Santonian (ca. 84 Mya) [44], [45]. Titanosaurian sauropods are common in the formation.

Diagnosis.

Aerosteon riocoloradensis is characterized by a prefrontal with a very short ventral process, an enlarged quadrate foramen located entirely within the quadrate, a large tympanic diverticulum into the quadrate shaft above the articular condyle, anterior dorsal vertebra with very large parapophyses, dorsal neural spines with central pneumatic space, posteriormost dorsal vertebra with anterodorsally inclined neural spine and a pneumatic canal within the transverse process, anterior caudal vertebrae with a large pleurocoel, medial gastral elements coossified with anterior and posterior flanges, and a furcula with median pneumatocoel.

These features distinguish Aerosteon riocoloradensis from known South American abelisaurids, as represented by Carnotaurus sastrei [5] and Illokelesia aguadagrandensis [6], spinosaurids such as Irritator challengeri [9], and carcharodontosaurids such as Giganotosaurus carolinii [10], Mapusaurus rosae [12] or Tyrannotitan chubutensis [46].

Referred Material.

MCNA-PV-3138, left metatarsal 2; MCNA-PV-3139, articulated left tibia, fibula, astragalus and calcaneum lacking only the proximal end of the fibula. This material is tentatively referred to A. coloradensis on the basis of its horizon and morphology, the latter impossible to overlap with the holotypic skeleton but consistent as pertaining to a basal tetanuran. Both referred specimens pertain to slightly smaller individuals that the holotype. MCNA-PV-3138 was found approximately 10 m away from the holotypic locality. MCNA-PV-3139 was found several kilometers distant.

Description

We briefly comment below on the morphology of Aerosteon riocoloradensis and provide some basic cranial and postcranial measurements (Tables 13). An isolated crown of relatively small size was found at the site and has approximately three serrations per millimeter on both mesial and distal margins (Figure 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Dimensions (cm) of isolated crown and select cranial bones of the holotypic specimen of Aerosteon riocoloradensis (MCNA-PV-3137).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Dimensions (cm) of select vertebrae (Figures 59) from the holotypic specimen of Aerosteon riocoloradensis (MCNA-PV-3137).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Dimensions (cm) of girdle bones (Figures 1115) of the holotypic specimen of Aerosteon riocoloradensis (MCNA-PV-3137).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.t003

Cranium.

Of the preserved cranial bones (prefrontal, postorbital, quadrate, posterior pterygoid part, prearticular), the prefrontal, postorbital and quadrate are the most informative. The prefrontal is complete and lacks a long ventral process along the orbital margin, unlike most basal tetanurans such as Allosaurus [47] and Sinraptor [48].

The triradiate postorbital has a short posterior process, a subtriangular ventral process, and a blunt medial process (Figure 3). In lateral view, the orbit margin is only slightly raised and rugose (Figure 3A). It does not exhibit the expanded brow ridge common to Acrocanthosaurus [49], [50] and other carcharodontosaurids [11], [15], and the medial socket for the head of the laterosphenoid is particularly shallow (Figure 3B), unlike either abelisaurids [51] or carcharodontosaurids [15].

The quadrate (Figures 4, 16B) has an enlarged fenestra bounded entirely by the shaft rather than shared by the quadrate and quadratojugal as in many other theropods [47], [48]. Just below that fenestra is a large pneumatocoel that extends as a blind fossa deep within the quadrate at the base of the pterygoid process. The fossa descends to the edge of the quadrate condyles, where it would likely have crossed the jaw joint and entered the lower jaw, as does the paratympanic sinus in many living birds and crocodilians [52]. This pneumatic fossa is much better developed than depressions on the quadrate shaft in the carcharodontosaurid Giganotosaurus [10] or the abelisaurid Majungasaurus [51]. The distal condyles are very broad relative to the height of the quadrate (Table 1), which contrasts strongly with the condition in abelisaurids [51].

Axial Skeleton.

All of the vertebrae exhibit camellate (honeycomb) internal structure in both the centrum and neural arch. The expression of a “hyperpneumatic” condition in the vertebrae is matched elsewhere by the marked pneumatic invasion of the quadrate, appendicular elements and gastralia. The heightened state of pneumatic invasion across these skeletal divisions suggests genetic control of the degree or general extent of pneumaticity [31], [52]. Such extensive camellate pneumaticity along the entire vertebral column has been reported previously in advanced coelurosaurs, such as Tyrannosaurus [23], [53], and in titanosaurs [23], [26], [27].

The atlas has a single slit-shaped pneumatopore in the center of the neural arch that opens dorsally (Figure 5A). The atlantal intercentrum does not appear to be pneumatic. Posterior to the atlas, the pleurocoels are paired in anterior cervical vertebrae with an anterodorsally inclined septum (Figure 5B). They grade into a single opening in the mid cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae (Figures 6, 7), and then grade again into paired openings with an posterodorsally inclined septum in the posteriormost dorsal and sacral vertebrae (Figures 8, 16C) (Table 2).

The pneumatic features in dorsal 14 are extreme. The neural spine has a large central lumen (Figure 16C). Another lumen passes along the length of the transverse process, opening at its distal end into the rib (Figure 16C). Extensive intervertebral pneumatic communication exists via openings near the vertebral canal, between pre- and postzygapophyses, and between neural spines.

There appear to be only five sacral vertebrae in Aerosteon as is the case in Allosaurus and many other theropods outside Coelurosauria. Only fragments of sacral 1 are preserved. The middle three sacrals (S2–4) are the most complete, their centra coossified. Sacral 5 is represented by a partial centrum and transverse process. The sacral vertebrae were found together in sequence but were truncated by erosion.

Three caudal vertebrae are preserved including caudal 1, a mid caudal centrum, and a distal caudal centrum (Figure 9). A single opening is present in all vertebrae except the left side of the mid caudal, which has a second small posterior pneumatopore (Figure 9B). The internal structure of all caudal centra is camellate, as is the neural arch of caudal 1. The first caudal centrum has a large pleurocoel and a posteriorly deflected transverse process. Chevron facets are present along its posterior edge, whereas there is no indication of chevron facets anteriorly. Mid and distal caudal centra have short proportions and do not seem to exhibit the lengthening characteristic of tetanuran theropods (Figures 9B, 16A).

Cervical and dorsal ribs have pneumatic fossae or pneumatocoels opening near the junction of the capitulum and tuberculum on the anterior side of the rib head. The most extreme condition occurs in the last dorsal vertebra, in which a pneumatic canal extends within the transverse process to the rib (Figure 16C).

Gastralia are composed of medial and lateral elements. The suture between the medial and lateral elements is sinuous and long and in many cases is fused. Medial elements, with rare exception, fuse in the midline (Figure 10). Isolated medial elements show a complex articulation with the contralateral medial element in the midline, where each element is expanded with anterior and posterior flanges. Successive rows of medial elements may have been in contact along their edges, however the usual criss-cross relationship between gastral rows in the midline does not appear to have been developed. Instead, coossification of medial elements and fusion of medial and lateral elements results in single, U-shaped units composed of an opposing pair of medial and lateral elements. In one case asymmetrical fusion has welded together two successive medial elements (Figure 10A). The gastral cuirass in Aerosteon, as a result, seems much less flexible than in many other theropods.

Several pneumatopores open from the external side of the gastralia into the body of the element, passing internally along the gastral shaft without septae. In one case, an oval pneumatopore opens into a space within the gastralium approximately 1 cm in diameter (Figures 10B, 16E). This pneumatic excavation enters and hollows the shaft of one of the medial elements (Figure 10B). Pneumaticity within gastralia, which form in dermal bone, has never been reported previously.

Appendicular Skeleton.

The scapulocoracoid has a subrectangular blade comparable in proportions to that in many allosauroids, such as Sinraptor [48]. The junction between scapula and coracoid is particularly thick, measuring more than 6 cm. The coracoid is hook-shaped.

The furcula (wishbone) is V-shaped with a broad intrafurcular angle of 120° and epicleideal processes that arch slightly to each side (Table 3). The bone is nearly flat in anterior and posterior views (Figure 11). The slit-shaped pneumatopore opens dorsally on the posterior side of the bone and has rounded margins (Figures 11B, 12A, 16D). The undivided pneumatocoel has a crescentic shape, which extends into the proximal one-half of each epicleideal process.

The ilium has a deep preacetabular process, a tapering postacetabular process, and an arched brevis fossa (Figures 13,14). The preacetabular process is weakly divided along its anterior margin into two lobes (Figure 13A). There are many small pneumatopores on each side of the blade (Figure 14). The largest of these occurs on the medial side between sacral attachment sites (Figure 14B). The pubic peduncle is robust, measuring about twice as long as broad at its distal end (Figures 13, 16F; Table 3). Several smaller pneumatocoels are grouped together on the lateral aspect of the pubic peduncle and vary in diameter from several millimeters to several centimeters (Figures 14C, 16F). The rims of these openings are finished, and all internal canals have smooth surfaces that are indisputably pneumatic in origin and communicate with the honeycomb texture within the bone (Figure 16F, enlarged cross-section). Another large pneumatic opening is located at mid length along the brevis fossa and opens posteriorly. Just proximal to this opening are five additional irregular pneumatopores that open ventrally (Figure 14D).

The articulated pubes, in contrast, do not show any external pneumatopores and are composed of dense or cancellous bone (Figure 15). A break at mid length along the pubic shafts shows they are composed of solid bone without any cancellous structure. The iliac peduncle is massive, and like the ischial peduncle is gently concave; there is no indication of a peg-in-socket articulation as occurs in some other theropods. The pubis bears a very large distal boot that is coossified with its opposite in the midline (Figure 15A). The boot measures approximately 70% the length of the pubis, which is proportionately among the largest known among theropods (Table 3).

The pelvic outlet is rather narrow dorsoventrally and transversely as in Alllosaurus (Figure 15B). The diameter of the posteriormost dorsal (Table 2) equals the space between the pubes, which leaves only a narrow passage for communication from the abdominal cavity to areas under the sacrum.

Discussion

Phylogenetic Position

The form of the pectoral and pelvic girdles in the holotypic skeleton clearly indicate that Aerosteon is a basal tetanuran (Figure 17). These features, which include the unexpanded crescentic coracoid, relatively broad scapular blade, relatively narrow brevis fossa and robust pubic peduncle of the ilium, and open obturator notch and large boot of the pubis, and sacrum limited to five vertebrae, closely resemble the condition in the allosauroids Allosaurus [47] and Acrocanthosaurus [49], [50], [54]. The small prefrontal and triradiate postorbital, which shows no development of a swollen brow or infraorbital flange, are closest to that in Allosaurus and very different from that in abelisaurids and carcharodontosaurids [15], [51].

thumbnail
Figure 17. Cladogram of Dinosauria showing the four-phase model for evolution of avian air sacs and lung ventilation within Theropoda.

Phase I (Theropoda), variable posterior extension of paraxial cervical air sacs. Phase II (Tetanurae), elaboration of cranial (clavicular) and caudal (abdominal) intrathoracic air sac divisions and subcutaneous diverticulae. Phase III (Maniraptoriformes), primitive costosternal ventilatory pump. Phase IV (Maniraptora), advanced costosternal ventilatory pump. Abbreviations: aas, abdominal air sac; cas, cervical air sac; caas, caudal air sacs; clas, clavicular air sac; cor, coracoid; cras, cranial air sacs; lu, lung; sr, sternal rib; st, sternum; up, uncinate process; vr, vertebral rib. Bold arrow on lung indicates flow-through lung ventilation; question mark indicates uncertainty in the direction of air flow (uni- or bidirectional).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.g017

Placing Areosteon more precisely among basal tetanurans is not possible without further analysis. The foregoing suggests, however, that Areosteon represents a new and distinctive basal tetanuran lineage recorded for the first time in Upper Cretaceous rocks in South America.

Source of Postcranial Pneumaticity

Axial Pneumaticity.

Inferences about postcranial pneumaticity in Aerosteon are very dependent on the condition in extant birds (Neornithes), the only extant outgroup with comparable skeletal structures related to pneumatization. Because only a single outgroup is available, soft-tissue inferences are weaker [55: level–two inference]. Osteological correlates must establish a convincing link for soft-tissue inference.

Anterior axial pneumaticity (cervical to anterior dorsal vertebrae plus their associated ribs) has long been attributed to cervical air sacs in saurischian dinosaurs like Aerosteon. Pleurocoels, pneumatic neural arches, and costal pneumatocoels closely match those in extant birds derived from diverticulae of the cervical air sacs. Posterior axial pneumaticity (posterior dorsal, sacral, and caudal vertebrae) occurs sporadically in nonavian saurischians and has been attributed either to cervical air sacs or to diverticulae extending directly from the lung and abdominal air sacs [23], [26], [27], [22], [31], [33], [35], [37]. In Aerosteon posterior axial pneumaticity has a similar form to that elsewhere among nonavian saurischians—a posterior extension without hiatus of the pneumatic pattern established in the anterior axial column.

In living birds, anterior and posterior axial pneumaticity develops during growth as diverticulae invade the axial skeleton from cervical air sacs, lung diverticulae, and caudal (abdominal) air sacs. These separate sources for axial pneumaticity can leave a pneumatic hiatus in the thoracic vertebrae, where the approaching diverticulae fail to fully anastomose. In Gallus, for example, there is an apneumatic hiatus in the thoracic vertebrae that may persist in the adult [20].

Wedel [26] pointed out that such a pneumatic hiatus has never been reported in saurischian dinosaurs that exhibit axial pneumaticity in presacral and sacral regions of the vertebral column. A hiatus might be expected to occur in young individuals, if axial pneumatization is derived from multiple sources as in living birds. Immature individuals of the ornithomimid Sinornithomimus as young as one year in age [56], however, show the same continuous and gradational pattern of presacral pleurocoels as occurs in subadults of the same species or adults of other ornithomimid genera [57].

Recently O'Connor proposed that axial pneumaticity in the abelisaurid theropod Majungasaurus can be used “to refine inferences related to pulmonary structure” [35: 159], because “it shows a reduction in the pneumaticity in the last two dorsal neural arches, with enhanced pneumaticity in sacral aches [31: 22]. Specifically, the “size and number of neural arch foramina” are reduced in dorsal vertebrae 12 and 13, whereas the same are “enhanced” in sacral vertebrae, indicating “two different sources of pneumatization” [33: 253]. The actual differences, however, were not described, and dorsal vertebrae 12 and 13 were not figured until recently [35: figs. 3, 12, 13].

Review of the posterior dorsal-to-sacral vertebral series in Majungasaurus suggests an equally plausible alternative explanation. The two posteriormost dorsal vertebrae have narrower, shorter transverse processes with single-headed ribs [35]. In preceding dorsal vertebrae, a pair of pneumatic fossae open on either side of the parapophysis (infraprezygapophyseal and infradiapophyseal fossae) as well as one farther posteriorly (infrapostzygapophyseal fossa). The loss of a distinct parapophyseal process eliminates the ridge of bone that divided the two anterior fossae, leaving a more broadly open area. Although not mentioned in the description, a distinct small funnel-shaped fossa is maintained in this area in dorsal 12 [[35: fig. 12C]], and a more broadly open fossa still remains in dorsal 13 [35: fig. 13A], representing the fusion of infraprezygapophyseal and infradiapophyseal fossae in both vertebrae. Counting the infrapostzygapophyseal fossa, two of the three fossae present in more anterior dorsal vertebrae appear in reduced form in these posteriormost dorsal vertebrae.

The mid sacral vertebrae are preserved, and each has two fossae visible on the ventral aspect of the diapophysis [35: fig. 13A]. Unlike any of the infradiapophyseal fossae in the presacral column, these are invaginated with a sharp-rimmed opening. The likely explanation for this is the increase surrounding bone from massive sacral attachments and fusion of adjacent neural arches. The pneumatic diverticulae thus are better surrounded by bone, compared to the posteriormost dorsal vertebrae with their reduced transverse processes.

It appears, in sum, that the “reduction” and “enhancement” of pneumatic fossae between posterior dorsal and sacral vertebrae in Majungasaurus is directly related to “reduction” and “enhancement” of vertebral structure. Regarding the reduced fossae in dorsal 12, O'Connor remarked, “Concomitant with the reduction in neural arch laminae, pneumatic foramina are only present immediately adjacent to the postzygapophyses” [35: 144]. This reduction of the size of the pneumatic fossae, nonetheless, was presented as prima facie evidence for separation of cervical and abdominal “focal centers” of pneumatic diverticulae [31: 22].

The situation in Aerosteon is instructive for the contrast that it provides across the same vertebral transition. In this case, pneumaticity appears to peak in the last dorsal, with a large pneumatic canal in the transverse process that is not present in sacral vertebrae (Figure 4C). The pleurocoels, in addition, develop a posterodorsally inclined partition in the posteriormost dorsal vertebrae that passes into the sacral series unchanged. The axial column of Aerosteon does not suggest a clean partitioning based on the number or size of pneumatic spaces, but rather a gradation in pleurocoel form that extends from the anterior cervical vertebrae through the distal caudal vertebrae. As in other saurischians, there is no pneumatic gap separating distinct zones.

O'Connor and Claessens [33: 253] have argued that the “general pattern of pneumaticity in Majungasaurus is expressed throughout Theropoda … indicating a consistent and widespread pattern of pneumatic invasion by caudally located air sacs in non-avian theropods.” Their cited tabulation of theropod vertebral pneumaticity, however, does not include any examples of axial pneumaticity partitioned by an apneumatic gap. The data from Majungasaurus, although well preserved and described [35], is not qualitatively different from information on saurischian vertebral pneumaticity that has been available for more than a century [58][60]. On this evidence alone, the source of posterior axial pneumaticity in nonavian saurischians is likely to remain controversial, even if posterior axial pneumaticity in most extant avians is derived from diverticulae of the lung and abdominal air sacs [26].

Gastral Pneumaticity.

An extraordinary feature of Aerosteon is the pneumatic hollowing of several gastralia (Figures 10, 16E), the first such example in the nonavian dinosaur record. Pneumatopores that vary in shape from oval to more elongate enter the external (ventral) surface and open into pneumatic spaces that hollow sections of the shaft of two medial gastral elements. In one medial gastral element (fused to its opposite in the midline), a shallow external trough leads to an oval pneumatopore, which opens into a subcylindrical space within the shaft (Figure 10). The internal pneumatic spaces do not have partitions when prepared or viewed in computed tomographic section (Figure 16E).

The external (ventral) position of the pneumatopores suggests that the pneumatic diverticulae lay in superficial tracts outside the gastral cuirass. It seems unlikely that pneumatic diverticulae would penetrated the ventral thoracic wall to access external pneumatopores, when entering the gastralia directly from their internal (dorsal) surface would be much easier. A plausible explanation may be that these ventral pneumatic tracts are part of a subcutaneous system, which is present to varying degrees in birds and is composed of diverticulae from cervical, clavicular, and abdominal air sacs [1], [21], [22]. Subcutaneous diverticulae usually exit the thoracic cavity and extend under the skin to distant body surfaces. In the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), for example, diverticulae of the clavicular air sac exit the thoracic cavity dorsally and extend under the skin to reach the entire ventral surface of the thorax [61].

Appendicular Pneumaticity.

Pneumaticity in pectoral and pelvic girdles may provide a more straightforward signpost for ventilatory air sacs, because these bones are pneumatized exclusively by ventilatory sacs in living birds. The median pneumatocoel in the furcula (wishbone) of Aerosteon is very similar to that in some living anseriforms (screamers, ducks, geese) (Figure 12B). Pelicaniforms (boobies, pelicans) also have a pneumatic furcula, but the bone is aerated via contralateral pneumatocoels on each clavicular ramus. Furcular pneumaticity in birds always involves diverticulae of the clavicular air sac, the most anterior of the cranial air sacs, which is located between the rami of the furcula (Figure 1, clas) [1], [16], [19], [22], [36].

The pneumatic openings on lateral and ventral aspects of the ilium in Aerosteon may have been aerated by the abdominal air sac. These include pneumatic tracts and pneumatopores on the lateral aspect of the blade (Figure 14A), pubic peduncle (Figure 14C), and ventral aspect of the brevis fossa (Figure 14D). They provide entry into the honeycomb (camellate) internal structure of the ilium (Figure 16F). Iliac pneumaticity in birds is developed exclusively by diverticulae of the abdominal air sac, which is located under the synsacrum as the most posterior of the caudal air sacs (Figure 1, aas). The openings on the lateral aspect of the iliac blade, given their external, superficial location, may be derived from subcutaneous diverticulae of the abdominal air sac [1], [16], [19], [21], [22], [36].

Some of the iliac pneumatic sculpting, nevertheless, may have been associated with posterior extension of the cervical air sac system. In particular, the pneumatopores on the medial aspect of the iliac blade (Figure 14B) and brevis fossa (Figure 14D) are adjacent to the sacral axial column and may have been pneumatized from the same source. As with posterior axial pneumaticity, the absence of extant analogs with similar pelvic and pneumatic structures weakens the case that all of the pneumatic features of the ilium originate exclusively from the abdominal air sac.

Evolution of Avian Air Sacs and Lung Ventilation

Structural Phases.

Tracking pneumatic patterns in the fossil record is complicated by the one-sided nature of outgroup comparison, which is restricted to birds among extant vertebrates, and the ambiguous meaning of the absence of a soft structure that only sometimes leaves an osteological imprint [55]. What we can sketch is the most probable minimal distribution of these soft structures and how they might have changed.

Pneumatic sculpting (fossae, pneumatocoels) of the cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae in saurischians is widely understood as evidence of the presence of paraxial cervical air sacs, given the close correspondence with pneumatic structures observed in extant avians [22], [23], [31], [37] (Table 4). Fossils pertaining to a new basal theropod close to Eoraptor shows the presence of true pleurocoels in mid cervical vertebrae at the base of Theropoda [62], and it seems increasingly likely that a heterogeneously partitioned lung with air sacs were present in basal saurischian dinosaurs (Figure 17, bottom). The capacity of the cervical air sacs to invade centra to form invaginated pleurocoels may have evolved independently in sauropodomorphs (sauropods) and basal theropods and appears to have been lost several times within theropods.

thumbnail
Table 4. Osteological correlates of pneumatic features in the postcranial skeleton of nonavian dinosaurs based on observed pneumaticity in birds.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003303.t004

Phase I of our model of the evolution of air sacs highlights the variable expression of the cervical air sac system in posterior portions of the axial column in theropods (Figure 17). Pneumatic sculpting of posterior dorsal, sacral and caudal vertebrae varies widely between taxa and sometimes between individuals of the same species. Such variation could parallel variation in the posterior extension of the cervical are sacs, or it may only indicate variation in the capacity of the posterior portion of the cervical air sac system for pneumatic sculpting of bone. Pneumatic fossae appear to be present on the centra along much of the axial column in the new basal theropod [62].

In Phase II additional air sacs are present in tetanuran theropods within the thorax, at least some with extrathoracic subcutaneous diverticulae (Figure 17). Reduction of skeletal weight, as a consequence, is no longer the only purpose served by air sacs. These additional air sacs include both cranial and caudal divisions of avian intrathoracic air sacs involved in lung ventilation (Table 4). The presence of compliant intrathoracic air sacs confirms deep-seated heterogeneous partitioning of the respiratory system in these theropods into mechanical areas involved in respiratory flow (ventilatory air sacs) from those involved in gas exchange (lung). The presence of ventilatory air sacs, in turn, suggests that the lung was rigid and most likely attached dorsally to the ribcage as in birds. Dorsal attachment of the lung has been inferred from stiffening of the dorsal vertebrae with extra (hyposphene-hypantrum) articulations, deeper dorsal rib attachments, and the presence of pleurocoels in dorsal vertebrae [33], [37], although the correlation between these osteological features and lung attachment seems poorly established. Although phase II theropods like Aerosteon display pneumatic sculpting consistent with cranial and caudal air sac divisions in birds, we do not claim they had unidirectional lung ventilation. Osteological correlates for directional lung ventilation, in our opinion, have yet to be established (Table 4).

Aerosteon currently provides the best evidence for intra- and extrathoracic air sacs and diverticulae, based on pneumatic invasion of the furcula, ilium and gastralia (Figure 16). As discussed above, we and others [26], [34] regard the relatively continuous pneumatic sculpting in the posterior axial column of nonavian dinosaurs as ambiguous evidence for abdominal air sacs [contra 22,31,33]. We anticipate that evidence from appendicular bones for these additional air sacs will be discovered in other species, and that this distribution may eventually encompass most theropods.

In Phase III a primitive costosternal pump is present, the evidence for which is best preserved in the basal ornithomimid Pelecanimimus [63], [64]. The holotype and only known specimen (LH 7777) has a pair of elongate ossified sternal plates and several pairs of ossified sternal ribs. The coracoid remains hook-shaped as in other ornithomimids and lacks the square distal end that characterizes the coracoid in maniraptorans. Unlike maniraptorans, the coracoid does not contact the sternum, and there is no trace of ossified uncinate processes.

Complete, articulated skeletons of other ornithomimids show no trace of sternal ossifications [56], [57], except for a pair of rod-shaped “xiphisternal” elements in Struthiomimus [65]. Sternal ossifications are also absent in another toothed basal ornithomimid that preserves most of the skeleton [66]. The rare ossification of sternal structures in ornithomimids, when their existence in cartilage was correctly inferred [65], highlights the problematic nature of trying to establish accurate distributions for characters related to respiratory function. Retention of dorsal ribs posterior to those attached to the sternum as well as a full gastral cuirass with mobile median articulations suggests that, in spite of the presence of a large ossified or cartilaginous sternum, the costal and gastral skeleton continued to play a role in aspiration breathing.

In Phase IV the costosternal pump is more birdlike still (Figure 17), as seen in the basal oviraptorosaur Caudipteryx [67] and in several dromaeosaurids [68][70]. The ribcage is proportionately shorter anteroposteriorly and is crossed by a series of ossified uncinate processes, which have been linked to respiratory mechanics in living birds [71]. The large paired sternal plate articulates with ossifed sternal ribs laterally and has a thickened anterior end marked by a groove to receive the ventral edge of the coracoid [68], [70]. Synovial joints thus appear to be well formed between the sternum and the sternal ribs and coracoid. Although the sternal ribs have not been shown to have transversely expanded distal ends for articulation with the sternum as occurs in birds [34], it is difficult to deny that the ribcage and pectoral girdle are mechanically united in a manner very similar to that in birds [70]. The primary respiratory role played by uncinate processes in living birds [71] suggests that the derived form of the ribcage and pectoral girdle in phase IV theropods served a ventilatory role as a costosternal pump. Again, whether that ventilation was uni- or bidirectional we regard as impossible to ascertain from current evidence.

Lung Ventilation, Air Sacs.

Two general models have been proposed for lung ventilation in nonavian dinosaurs. The first infers the presence of compliant lungs with crocodile-like diaphragmatic ventilation, based in part on stained areas in two theropod skeletons purported to represent a diaphragm separating thoracic and abdominal cavities [72], [73]. The stains and their interpretations have been contested, and the evidence for their arguments refuted by several authors [22], [25][27], [37]. A second model infers avianlike flow-through lung ventilation with a rigid dorsally-attached lung and compliant air sacs. This hypothesis is based mainly on the morphology of the ribcage and on pneumatic sculpting in the axial column attributable to air sacs [24], [33], [64], [70]. Although more plausible, the second hypothesis actually consists of a collection of inferences about (1) pulmonary morphology and function and (2) the mechanics of aspiration respiration in nonavian dinosaurs. The osteological or logical correlates needed to support some of these inferences have been poorly articulated, which may explain the wide range of opinions on when intrathoracic air sacs like those in birds first evolved and how these relate to ventilatory patterns. We assemble the osteological correlates we used as a guide in assembling the four-phase model outlined above (Table 4). Below we first consider inferences about air sacs and later those involving the ribcage and gastral cuirass.

Some of the initial reconstructions of the pulmonary condition in nonavian dinosaurs were characterized as the “stepwise transformation of a crocodilian-like lung into an avian airsac system” [74: 132]. Such a transformational approach presumes that the crocodilian lung is primitive for archosaurs, which may not be the case. For nonavian dinosaurs, avians are the first and only outgroup for many of the pneumatic structures of interest, and so identifying osteological correlates and their probable functional associations is the best available approach [55].

Perry [75: 58] outlined a “dinosaur grade” pulmonary system that involved a dorsally attached lung, avian-like air sacs, bi-directional air flow, and costal-driven aspiration. Later [74], [76: 134] it was postulated that the “dynamic gastralia” of theropods suggests there were abdominal air sacs, which in turn are “crucial for unidirectional flow in the paleopulmo of birds.” On this basis, anterior and posterior air “chambers” were inferred to have evolved at the base of Dinosauria and “true airsacs” to have evolved at the base of Theropoda [76: fig. 1].

Based on the osteological correlates we have assembled (Table 4), we would argue, first, that until we can show evidence of the presence of at least one avian ventilatory air sac (besides the non-ventilatory cervical air sac), it is problematic to infer the presence of flow-through ventilation or a rigid, dorsally-attached lung. Second, we know of no osteological correlates in the gastral cuirass that would justify the inference of abdominal air sacs. Potential kinesis of the gastral cuirass and an accessory role in aspiration breathing potentially characterizes many amniotes besides nonavian dinosaurs [77][79]. The absence of gastralia in crown birds or in any extant bipeds also hinders functional inferences. And third, it is not well established that abdominal air sacs were either first to evolve or are functionally critical to unidirectional ventilation.

Experimental studies on ventilation in birds have shown slight changes in the orientation of air sacs relative to the connecting air passages can convert bidirectional to unidirectional flow in a poorly valved respiratory tract [2], [77], [78]. The slight pressure differences driving the particular ventilatory pattern have no known osteological correlates. A heterogeneous pulmonary system composed of a rigid lung and single air sac effectively separates the exchanger and pump, respectively, and would suffice to drive bidirectional or even unidirectional lung ventilation, given appropriate valving. The cranial-caudal air sac divisions and two-breath respiratory cycle of extant avians, thus, may have evolved from a simpler flow-through system.

Only the abdominal air sac in birds extends into the abdominal cavity, the other air sacs occupying more anterior spaces separated by septae [79]. Although the abdominal air sac may be more favorably located to play a ventilatory role [80], this has not been demonstrated in experimental systems or in living birds. All ventilatory air sacs are operative during lung ventilation in birds, with cranial and caudal divisions closely approximating each other in volume [2].

Lung Ventilation, Ribcage Function.

Research on the gastral cuirass in archosaurs led to the suggestion that it may have functioned as an accessory aspiration pump in nonavian dinosaurs [81][83]. Although Claessens drew attention to the relationship between the gastral cuirass and abdominal air sacs, he concluded that “it appears impossible to ascertain exactly when lung diverticula stretching throughout the whole body cavity or unidirectional airflow originated” [83:102]. Later a “caudal origin model” for air sacs and flow-through lung ventilation (either uni- or bidirectional) was proposed [33: 255] based on (1) the presence of abdominal air sacs (inferred from posterior dorsal and sacral pneumaticity), (2) a dynamic gastral cuirass, and (3) vertebrocostal articulations in the posterior ribcage that allow greater excursion during aspiration (inferred from the more horizontal arrangement of posterior rib articulations). An independent study of rib morphology, in contrast, concluded that nonavian dinosaurs were characterized by an “anteriorly ventilated bellows lung” [84: 47].

In Aerosteon the dorsal rib articulations (especially the parapophysis) are quite large, and the diapophysis is always located dorsal to the parapophysis (Figures 7, 8) as in Allosaurus [47] and Tyrannosaurus [53]. An axis through these two rib articulations is canted anteroventrally from the vertical at about 5–10° in anterior dorsal vertebrae (Figure 7A, B) and increases to a maximum of about 25° in dorsal 11 (Figure 8A) before decreasing in the posteriormost dorsal vertebra (Figure 8B). In no part of the column does the does this costal articular axis approach the horizontal like that in abelisauroids [5], [35], [85] and some allosauroids [48].

Most or all of the gastral cuirass, in addition, is either fused or solidly articulated in the midline, which would prevent expansion of the cuirass as an accessory aspiration pump as proposed [33], [68], [81][83]. Although many nonavian dinosaurs may have employed costal- or gastral-driven aspiration, the condition in Aerosteon suggests that a more detailed comparative assessment of ribcage morphology and function is required. Currently we know of no osteological correlates in dorsal ribs or gastralia that would allow inference of either the presence of intrathoracic air sacs or a particular pattern of lung ventilation (Table 4) [34].

Avian lung ventilation is driven by muscles that expand and contract thoracic volume by deforming the ribcage and rocking a large bony sternum [4], [71]. Basal maniraptorans have many of the features associated with this ventilatory mechanism including a large ossified sternum, ossified sternal ribs, uncinate processes a deepened coracoid that contacts the sternum along a synovial hinge joint [68][70]. By contrast Aerosteon and the abelisaurid Majungasaurus lack these features. Does that mean that maniraptorans had evolved unidirectional lung ventilation? Or does it indicate only that the maniraptoran ribcage functioned in aspiration breathing more like that in avians? We do not know of any osteological correlates that are specifically tied to uni- or bidirectional lung ventilation (Table 4), which may explain the range of opinion as to how and when avian unidirectional lung ventilation first evolved.

Driving Factors.

The factors driving the origin and evolution of the functional capacity of avian air sacs and lung ventilation remain poorly known and tested. We briefly mention these in the light of the new evidence from Aerostoen. Currently three factors have been proposed: (1) more efficient flow-through respiration, (2) locomotor balance in bipeds, and (3) thermoregulation. The first, perhaps the most common, is to construct intermediate morphologies between extant crocodilians and birds and presume that avian air sacs and unidirectional lung ventilation originated gradually for the respiratory functions they now perform [74][76], [86]. Given that many dinosaurs probably had elevated metabolic rates, more efficient lung ventilation may have been required [72], [73], although others have argued that gas exchange was not a limiting factor [87]. This hypothesis is difficult to test without better data from the fossil record and reliable osteological correlates for soft tissues and specific functions.

The second is that air sacs may have arisen originally for locomotory control in bipeds as a means to lower the center of mass and reduce rotational inertia [88], [89]. Evidence of air sacs, however, does not seem strongly correlated with the advent of bipedalism among dinosaurian precursors and its maintenance among descendants. Besides bipedal theropods, four-legged sauropods provide the best evidence among nonavian saurischian dinosaurs of air sacs, which do not seem to have been present in the broad array of bipedal ornithischians. Bipedalism, moreover, may have arisen as an upright posture that reduced mechanical conflict between locomotion and breathing [90], [91] rather than as a catalyst for air sacs.

Finally thermoregulatory control may have played a role in the origin of air sacs [26]. Living birds lack sweat glands, which in mammals reduce excess body heat by evaporative loss from highly vascularized surface tissues. Could air sacs or their intermuscular and subcutaneous diverticulae initially have played a similar role in heat transfer? Aerosteon may have had a fairly extensive system of subcutaneous air sacs enveloping the thoracic cavity. The fossil evidence for intrathoracic air sacs now closely overlaps that for feathers, which had evolved in coelurosaurian theropods most likely for heat retention [92]. Air sacs may have initially been employed as an antagonist to feathers in theropod thermoregulation. Although this hypothesis has been criticized for lack of empirical evidence in living birds [22], air sacs have been implicated in avian heat transfer and/or evaporative heat loss [93][95], and Aerosteon and many other theropods had a body weight more than an order of magnitude greater than that for any living bird. A thermoregulatory role for the early evolution of air sacs in nonavian dinosaurs should not be ruled out without further evidence from nonvolant ratites.

In sum, although we may never be able to sort out the most important factors behind the origin and evolution of the unique avian pulmonary system, discoveries such as Aerosteon provide clues that help to constrain the timing and circumstances when many of the fundamental features of avian respiration arose.

Conclusions

We present a four-phase model for the evolution of avian air sacs and costosternal-driven lung ventilation based on the known fossil record of theropod dinosaurs and osteological correlates in extant birds:

  1. Phase I—Elaboration of paraxial cervical air sacs in basal theropods no later than the earliest Late Triassic.
  2. Phase II—Differentiation of avian ventilatory air sacs, including both cranial (clavicular air sac) and caudal (abdominal air sac) divisions, in basal tetanurans during the Jurassic. A heterogeneous respiratory tract with compliant air sacs, in turn, suggests the presence of rigid, dorsally attached lungs with flow-through ventilation.
  3. Phase III—Evolution of a primitive costosternal pump in maniraptoriform theropods before the close of the Jurassic.
  4. Phase IV—Evolution of an advanced costosternal pump in maniraptoran theropods before the close of the Jurassic.
    In addition, we conclude:
  5. The advent of avian unidirectional lung ventilation is not possible to pinpoint, as there are no known osteological correlates for uni- or bidirectional lung ventilation.
  6. The origin and evolution of avian air sacs may have been driven by one or more of the following three factors: flow-through lung ventilation, locomotory balance, and/or thermal regulation.

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the 1996 expedition for discovery of the material, Q. Cao and R. Masek for fossil preparation, E. Fitzgerald and T. Keillor for molding and casting, C. Straus for CT-scanning of fossil bones, and C. Abraczinskas for specimen drawings and executing final drafts of reconstructions. We thank B. Britt for comments on an earlier version of this paper. We are indebted to the Museo de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas (J. C. Moyano) de Mendoza (Argentina) for permission to conduct fieldwork and to the Field Museum of Natural History for loan of avian skeletal material.

Author Contributions

Involved in writing sections of the paper: PCS, RNM, JAW, DJV, OAA, HCEL. Participants in the fieldwork: PCS, RNM, JAW, DJV, OAA, HCEL.

References

  1. 1. King AS (1966) Structural and functional aspects of the avian lungs and air sacs. Int Rev Gen Exp Zool 2: 171–267.
  2. 2. Scheid P, Piiper J (1989) Respiratory mechanics and air flow in birds. In: King AS, McLelland J, editors. Form and Function in Birds. London: Academic Press. pp. 369–391.
  3. 3. Duncker H-R (1989) Structural and functional integration across the reptile-bird transition: locomotor and respiratory systems. In: Wake DB, Roth G, editors. Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 147–169.
  4. 4. Powell FL (2000) Respiration. In: Whittow GC, editor. Sturkie's Avian Physiology. 5th ed. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 233–265.
  5. 5. Bonaparte JF, Novas FE, Coria RA (1990) Carnotaurus sastrei Bonaparte, the horned, lightly built carnosaur from the Middle Cretaceous of Patagonia. Contrib Sci, Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles County 416: 1–42.
  6. 6. Coria RA, Salgado L (2000) A basal Abelisauria Novas, 1992 (Theropoda-Ceratosauria) from the Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. GAIA 15: 89–102.
  7. 7. Sampson SD, Krause DW, editors. (2007) Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J Vert Paleontol Mem 8 27: 1–184.
  8. 8. Sereno PC, Beck AL, Dutheil DB, Gado B, Larsson HCE, et al. (1998) A long-snouted predatory dinosaur from Africa and the evolution of spinosaurids. Science 282: 1298–1302.
  9. 9. Sues HD, Frey E, Martill DM, Scott DMIrritator challengeri, a spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. J Vert Paleontol 22: 535–547.
  10. 10. Coria RA, Salgado L (1995) A new giant carnivorous dinosaur from the Cretaceous of Patagonia. Nature 277: 224–226.
  11. 11. Sereno PC, Dutheil DB, Iarochene M, Larsson HCE, Lyon GH, et al. (1996) Predatory dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous faunal differentiation. Science 272: 986–991.
  12. 12. Coria RA, Currie PJ (2006) A new carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina. Geodiversitas 28: 71–118.
  13. 13. Sereno PC, Brusatte SL (2008) Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger. Acta Palaeontol Pol 53: 15–46.
  14. 14. Alcober O, Sereno PC, Larsson HCE, Martinez RN, Varricchio DJ (1998) A Late Cretaceous carcharodontosaurid (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) from Argentina. J Vert Paleontol 18: 23A.
  15. 15. Currie PJ, Carpenter K (2000) A new specimen of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA. Geodiversitas 22: 207–246.
  16. 16. Müller B (1908) The air-sacs of the pigeon. Smith Misc Coll 50: 365–414.
  17. 17. King AS, Kelly DF (1956) The aerated bones of Gallus domesticus: the fifth thoracic vertebra and sternal ribs. Brit Veter J 112: 279–283.
  18. 18. King AS (1957) The aerated bones of Gallus domesticus. Acta Anat 31: 220–230.
  19. 19. Duncker H-R (1971) The lung air sac system of birds. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 45: 1–171.
  20. 20. Hogg DA (1984) The distribution of pneumatization in the skeleton of the adult domestic fowl. J Anat 138: 617–629.
  21. 21. McLelland J (1989) Anatomy of the lungs and air sacs. In: King AS, McLelland J, editors. Form and Function in Birds. London: Academic Press. pp. 221–279.
  22. 22. O'Connor PM (2004) Pulmonary pneumaticity in the postcranial skeleton of extant Aves: A case study examining Anseriformes. J Morph 261: 141–161.
  23. 23. Britt BB (1993) Pneumatic postcranial bones in dinosaurs and other archosaurs [PhD thesis]. Calgary: University of Calgary.
  24. 24. Britt BB, Makovicky PJ, Gauthier J, Bonde N (1998) Postcranial pneumatization in Archaeopteryx. Nature 395: 374–376.
  25. 25. Christiansen P, Bonde N (2000) Axial and appendicular pneumaticity in Archaeopteryx. Proc Roy Soc London B 267: 2501–2505.
  26. 26. Wedel MJ (2003a) Vertebral pneumaticity, air sacs, and the physiology of sauropod dinosaurs. Paleobiol 29: 243–255.
  27. 27. Wedel MJ (2003b) The evolution of vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs. J Vert Paleontol 23: 344–357.
  28. 28. Eaton GF (1910) Osteology of Pteranodon. Mem Connecticut Acad Arts Sci 2: 1–38.
  29. 29. Howse SCB (1986) On the cervical vertebrae of the Pterodactyloidea (Reptilia: Archosauria). Zool J Linn Soc 88: 307–328.
  30. 30. Gower DJ (2001) Possible postcranial pneumaticity in the last common ancestor of birds and crocodilians: evidence from Erythrosuchus and other Mesozoic archosaurs. Naturwissenschaften 88: 119–122.
  31. 31. O'Connor PM (2006) Postcranial pneumaticity: An evaluation of soft-tissue influences on the postcranial skeleton and the reconstruction of pulmonary anatomy in archosaurs. J Morph 267: 1199–1226.
  32. 32. Nesbitt SJ, Norell MA (2006) Extreme convergence in the body plans of an early suchian (Archosauria) and ornithomimid dinosaurs (Theropoda). Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 273: 1045–1048.
  33. 33. O'Connor PM, Claessens LPAM (2005) Basic avian pulmonary design and flow-through ventilation in non-avian theropod dinosaurs. Nature 436: 253–256.
  34. 34. Chinsamy A, Hillenius WJ (2004) Physiology of nonavian dinosaurs. In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H, editors. The Dinosauria. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 643–659.
  35. 35. O'Connor PM (2007) The postcranial axial skeleton of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J Vert Paleontol Mem 8 27: 127–162.
  36. 36. Bezuidenhout AJ, Groenewald HB, Soley JT (1999) An anatomical study of the respiratory air sacs in ostriches. Onderstepoort J Veter Res 66: 317–325.
  37. 37. Paul GS (2001) Were the respiratory complexes of predatory dinosaurs like crocodilians or birds? In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H Ostrom (February 13–14, 1999): New Perspectives on the Origins and Evolution of Birds. New Haven: Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. pp. 463–482.
  38. 38. Bonaparte JF (1986) Les Dinosaures (Carnosaures, Allosauridés, Sauropodes, Cétiosauridés) du Jurassique moyen de Cerro Condor (Chubut, Argentine). Ann Paléontol 72: 325–386.
  39. 39. Makovicky PJ, Apesteguia S, Agnolin FL (2005) The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature 437: 1007–1011.
  40. 40. MartÍnez RD, Giménez O, Rodríguez J, Luna M, Lamanna MC (2004) An articulated specimen of the basal titanosaurian (Dinosauria: Saurropoda) Epachthosaurus sciuttoi from the early Late Cretaceous Bajo Barreal Formation of Chubut Province, Argentina. J Vert Paleontol 24: 107–120.
  41. 41. Sanz JL, Powell JE, Le Loeuff J, Martinez R, Pereda Suberbiola X (1999) Sauropod remains from the Upper Cretaceous of Laño (northcentral Spain). Titanosaur phylogenetic relationships. Estud Museo Ciencias Natur de Alava 14: 235–255.
  42. 42. Wilson JA (2006) Anatomical nomenclature of fossil vertebrates: standardized terms or 'lingua franca'? J Vert Paleontol 26: 511–518.
  43. 43. Wilson JA (1999) A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs. J Vert Paleontol 19: 639–653.
  44. 44. Leanza HA, Apestiguía S, Novas FE, de la Fuente MS (2004) Cretaceous terrestrial beds from the Neuquén Basin (Argentina) and their tetrapod assemblages. Cretaceous Res 25: 61–87.
  45. 45. Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Smith AG, editors. (2004) A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. 46. Novas F, Valais S, Vickers-Rich P, Rich T (2005) A large Cretaceous theropod from Patagonia, Argentina, and the evolution of carcharodontosaurids. Naturwissen 92: 226–230.
  47. 47. Madsen JH Jr (1976) Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Bull Utah Geol Min Surv 109: 1–163.
  48. 48. Currie PJ, Zhao X (1993) A new carnosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. Can J Earth Sci 30: 2037–2081.
  49. 49. Stovall WJ, Langston W Jr (1950) Acrocanthosaurus atokensis, a new genus and species of Lower Cretaceous Theropoda from Oklahoma. Am Mid Nat 43: 696–728.
  50. 50. Currie PJ, Carpenter K (2000) A new specimen of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA. Geodiversitas 22: 207–246.
  51. 51. Sampson SD, Witmer LM (2007) Craniofacial anatomy of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J Vert Paleontol Mem 8 27: 32–102.
  52. 52. Witmer LM (1997) The evolution of the antorbital cavity of archosaurs: A study in soft-tissue reconstruction in the fossil record with an analysis of the function of pneumaticity. J Vert Paleontol Mem 3 17: 1–73.
  53. 53. Brochu CA (2002) Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull. J Vert Paleontol Mem 7 22: 1–138.
  54. 54. Harris JD (1998) A reanalysis of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis, its phylogenetic status, and paleobiogeographic implications, based on a new specimen from Texas. New Mexico Mus Nat Hist Sci, Bull 13: 1–75.
  55. 55. Witmer LM (1995) The extant phylogenetic bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In: Thomason J, editor. Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. pp. 19–33.
  56. 56. Varricchio DJ, Sereno PC, Tan L, Zhao X, Wilson JA, et al. (2008) Mud-trapped dinosaur herd captures evidence of sociality. Acta Palaeontol Pol. (in press).
  57. 57. Osmólska H, Roniewicz E, Barsbold R (1972) A new dinosaur, Gallimimus bullatus n. gen., n. sp. (Ornithomimidae) from the Uppermost Cretaceous of Mongolia. Results of the Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expedition, Part IV. Palaeontol Pol 27: 103–143.
  58. 58. Gilmore CW (1920) Osteology of the carnivorous Dinosauria in the United States National Museum, with special reference to the genera Antrodemus (Allosaurus) and Ceratosaurus. Bulletin of the United States Natural Museum 110: 1–159.
  59. 59. Gilmore CW (1925) A nearly complete articulated skeleton of Camarasaurus, a saurischian dinosaur from the Dinosaur National Monument, Utah. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 10: 347–384.
  60. 60. Holland WJ (1906) The osteology of Diplodocus Marsh. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 2: 225–278.
  61. 61. Richardson F (1939) Functional aspects of the California brown pelican. The Condor 41: 13–17.
  62. 62. Martinez RN, Alcober OA, Sereno PC (in review) New primitive theropod dinosaur from the Carnian Ischigualasto Formation, northwestern Argentina. PLoS ONE.
  63. 63. Perez-Moreno BP, Sanz JL, Buscalioni AD, Moratalla JJ, Ortega F, et al. (1994) A unique multitoothed ornithomimosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain. Nature 30: 363–367.
  64. 64. Perez-Moreno BP, Sanz JL (1999) Theropod breathing mechanism. Riv Mus civ Sc Nat “E Caffi” Bergamo 20: 121–122.
  65. 65. Nicholls EL, Russell AP (1981) A new specimen of Struthiomimus altus from Alberta, with comments on the classificatory characters of the Upper Cretaceous ornithomimids. Can J Earth Sci 18: 518–536.
  66. 66. Ji Q, Norell MA, Makovicky P, Gao K-Q, Ji S, et al. (2003) An early ostrich dinosaur and implications for ornithomimosaur phylogeny. Am Mus Novitates 3420: 1–19.
  67. 67. Zhou Z-H, Wang X-L, Zhang F-C, Xu X (2000) Important features of Caudipteryx—evidence from two nearly complete skeletons. Vert Palasiatica 10: 241–254.
  68. 68. Norell MA, Makovicky PJ (1997) Important features of the dromaeosaur skeleton: Information from a new specimen. Amer Mus Novitates 3215: 1–28.
  69. 69. Burnham DA (2004) New Information on Bambiraptor feinbergi (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae from the Late Cretaceous of Montana. In: Currie PJ, Koppelhus EB, Shugar MA, Wright JL, editors. Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 67–111.
  70. 70. Codd JR, Manning PL, Norell MA, Perry SF (2008) Avian-like breathing mechanics in maniraptoran dinosaurs. Proc R Soc B: Biological Sciences 275: 157–161.
  71. 71. Codd JR, Boggs DF, Perry SF, Carrier DR (2005) Activity of three muscles associated with the uncinate process of the giant Canada goose Branta canadensis maximus. J Exp Biol 208: 849–857.
  72. 72. Ruben JA, Jones TD, Geist NR, Hillenius WJ (1997) Lung structure and ventilation in theropod dinosaurs and early birds. Science 278: 1267–1270.
  73. 73. Ruben JA, Dal Sasso C, Geist NR, Hillenius WJ, Jones TD, et al. (1999) Pulmonary function and metabolic physiology of theropod dinosaurs. Science 283: 514–516.
  74. 74. Perry SF (2001) Functional morphology of the reptilian and avian respiratory systems and its implications for theropod dinosaurs. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H Ostrom (February 13–14, 1999): New Perspectives on the Origins and Evolution of Birds. New Haven: Yale Peabody Museum. pp. 429–441.
  75. 75. Perry SF (1998) Lungs: comparative anatomy, functional morphology, and evolution. Biol Reptilia 19: 1–92.
  76. 76. Perry SF, Sander M (2004) Reconstructing the evolution of the respiratory apparatus in tetrapods. Respirat Physiol Neurobiol 144: 125–139.
  77. 77. Kuethe DO (1988) Fluid mechanical valving of air flow in bird lungs. J Exp Biol 136: 1–12.
  78. 78. Brown R (1995) The avian lung: is there an aerodynamic expiratory valve? J Exp Biol 198: 2349–2357.
  79. 79. Duncker HR (1978) General morphological principles of amniotic lungs. In: Piiper J, editor. Respiratory Function in Birds, Adult and Embryonic. Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp. 2–15.
  80. 80. Duncker HR (1972) Structure of avian lungs. Respir Physiol 14: 44–63.
  81. 81. Carrier DR, Farmer CG (2000) The Integration of ventilation and locomotion in archosaurs. Amer Zool 40: 87–100.
  82. 82. Carrier DR, Farmer CG (2000) The evolution of pelvic aspiration in archosaurs. Paleobiol 26: 271–293.
  83. 83. Claessens LPAM (2004) Dinosaur gastralia: Origin, morphology, and function. J Vert Paleontol 24: 89–106.
  84. 84. Hengst R26] (1998) Lung ventilation and gas exchange in dinosaurs. Science 281: 47.
  85. 85. Sereno PC, Wilson JA, Conrad JL (2004) New dinosaurs link southern landmasses in the Mid-Cretaceous. Proc Roy Soc London B 271: 1325–1330.
  86. 86. Larson PL (1997) The king's new clothes: a fresh look at Tyrannosaurus rex. In: Wolberg DL, Stump E, Rosenberg GD, editors. Dinofest International: Proceedings of a Symposium Sponsored by Arizona State University. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences. pp. 65–71.
  87. 87. Hicks JW, Farmer CG (1999) Gas exchange potential in reptilian lungs: implications for the dinosaur-avian connection. Resp Physiol 117: 73–83.
  88. 88. Carrier DR, Walter RM, Lee DV (2001) Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia. J Exp Biol 204: 3917–3926.
  89. 89. Farmer CG (2006) On the origin of avian air sacs. Resp Phys Neurobiol 154: 89–106.
  90. 90. Carrier DR (1987) The evolution of locomotor stamina in tetrapods: circumventing a mechanical constraint. Paleobiol 13: 326–341.
  91. 91. Brainerd EL, Owerkowicz T (2006) Functional morphology and evolution of aspiration breathing in tetrapods. Resp Physiol Neurobiol 154: 73–88.
  92. 92. Xu X, Zhou Z-H, Prum RO (2001) Branched integumentary structures in Sinornithosaurus and the origin of feathers. Nature 410: 200–204.
  93. 93. Schmidt-Nielsen K, Kanwisher J, Lasiewski RC, Cohn JE, Bretz WL (1969) Temperature regulation and respiration in the ostrich. Condor 71: 341–352.
  94. 94. Bernstein MH (1976) Ventilation and respiratory evaporation in the flying crow, Corvus ossifragus. Resp Physiol 26: 371–382.
  95. 95. Pennycuick CJ (1986) Mechanical constraints on the evolution of flight. In: Padian K, editor. The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences. pp. 83–98.