Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Direct Comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 Sequencing Technologies on the Same Microbial Community DNA Sample

  • Chengwei Luo,
  • Despina Tsementzi,
  • Nikos Kyrpides,
  • Timothy Read,
  • Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

There was an error in the funding statement. The correct funding statement is: This research was supported, in part, by the U.S. Department of Energy (award DE-SC0004601). The Emory Genome Center acknowledges the Georgia Research Alliance and the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute for funding for major equipment purchases. DT acknowledges the support of the Onassis Scholarship Foundation. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. No additional external funding was received for this study. The sponsors of this research had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Citation: Luo C, Tsementzi D, Kyrpides N, Read T, Konstantinidis KT (2012) Correction: Direct Comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 Sequencing Technologies on the Same Microbial Community DNA Sample. PLoS ONE 7(3): 10.1371/annotation/64ba358f-a483-46c2-b224-eaa5b9a33939. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/64ba358f-a483-46c2-b224-eaa5b9a33939

Published: March 29, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests: No competing interests declared.