During the typesetting of the article, several typographical errors were introduced that were not present in the original manuscript. All errors concern missing decimal points in the Results section of the article. PLoS ONE takes full responsibility for these errors.

On page 2 (Data coding and analyses) F-statistic should read F_1,32 = .71, p = .405, η_p² = .022. On page 2 and 3 (Results and discussion) F-statistics should read F_1,34 = 16.32, p < .001, η_p² = .324; F_1,34 = .47, p = .496, η_p² = .014; F_1,34 = .10, p = .758, η_p² = .003; t-statistics should read t(35) = 2.77, p = .009, d = 0.94; t(35) = 0.41, p = .686, d = 0.14; and Chi-square statistic should read χ²(1, N = 36) = 0.11, p > .999. On page 4 (Data coding and analyses) F-statistic should read F_1,32 =.49, p = .488, η_p² = .015. On page 4 (Results and discussion) F-statistic should read F_1,32 = .24, p = .631, η_p² = .007; F_1,32 = 7.93, p = .008, η_p² = .199; F_1,32 = 7.00, p = .013, η_p² = .180; F_1,32 = 7.00, p = .013, η_p² = .180; and t-statistics should read: t(8) = 1.35, p = .214, d = 0.96; t(8) = 1.89, p = .095, d = 1.34; t(8) = 1.41, p = .195, d = 1.00; t(8) = 1.00, p = .347, d = 0.71; t(8) = 1.35, p = .214, d = 0.96; t_s(8) = 5.12, p_s = .001, d_s = 3.62.