Figures
Abstract
Background
The development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC) involve a complex process of multiple genetic changes. Tumor suppressor p53 is capable of determining the fate of CRC cells. However, the role of a p53-inducible modulator, ribosomal protein S27-like (RPS27L), in CRC is unknown.
Methods
Here, the differential expression of RPS27L was examined in the feces and colonic tissues of CRC patients, to explore its possible correlation with patient survival and to investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying their clinical outcomes. Eighty intermediate-stage CRC patients (42 at stage II and 38 at stage III) were divided into two groups according to their fecal RPS27L mRNA levels. The survival probabilities of the groups were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The RPS27L protein in the colonic tissues of stage III patients with different prognoses was further examined immunohistochemically. RPS27L expression in LoVo cells was manipulated to examine the possible cellular responses in vitro.
Results
Elevated RPS27L expression, in either feces or tissues, was related to a better prognosis. In vitro, RPS27L-expressing LoVo cells ceased DNA synthesis and apoptotic activity while the expression of their DNA repair molecules was upregulated.
Conclusions
Elevated RPS27L may improve the prognoses of certain CRC patients by enhancing the DNA repair capacity of their colonic cells, and can be determined in feces. By integrating clinical, molecular, and cellular data, our study demonstrates that fecal RPS27L may be a useful index for predicting prognoses and guiding personalized therapeutic strategies, especially in patients with intermediate-stage CRC.
Citation: Huang C-J, Yang S-H, Lee C-L, Cheng Y-C, Tai S-Y, Chien C-C (2013) Ribosomal Protein S27-Like in Colorectal Cancer: A Candidate for Predicting Prognoses. PLoS ONE 8(6): e67043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067043
Editor: Syed A. Aziz, Health Canada and University of Ottawa, Canada
Received: January 30, 2013; Accepted: May 13, 2013; Published: June 24, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Huang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by NSC96–2320-B-281–001-MY3 and NSC100-2320-B-281-001 from the National Science Council, and CGH-MR-9919 from Cathay General Hospital. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most common fatal cancers, involve a complex process of multiple genetic changes [1], [2]. Surgery is the optimal treatment for CRC patients at stages II and III, but adjuvant chemotherapy has improved the prognosis for some of these intermediate-stage patients [3]. However, despite treatment, up to 25% of patients at stage II and 30–40% at stage III develop a distant metastasis or local relapse [4]. Molecular markers of CRC can be used to improve the decisions made regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients [5], but remain controversial [3].
When cells encounter stresses, tumor suppressor p53 is capable of determining their fate by facilitating the repair and survival of damaged cells or by eliminating severely damaged cells [6]. CRC tumorigenesis has long been related to functional loss of p53 and the consequent changes in expression of p53 responsive genes [7]. The most studied of these p53-responsive effects is the repair of damaged DNA, which is believed to be a major contributor to tumor progression [8]. The detection of alterations in expression of p53-responsive genes has been suggested to allow identification of patients at high risk of recurrence and those who should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy [9].
A group of ribosomal proteins with clinical significance to many human cancers has been identified, and the genes encoding most of these are responsive to p53 [10], [11]. In fact, in addition to their role in assembling with rRNA to construct ribosomes for new protein synthesis, ribosomal proteins are known to have many extraribosomal roles [12]–[14]. One of the ribosomal proteins, ribosomal protein S27-like (RPS27L), was reported to be downregulated in feces and tumor tissues of some late-stage CRC patients [15], [16]. This ribosomal protein and its homologous protein, RPS27, have been considered to have extended roles in cell growth regulation and DNA repair [17], [18]. In addition, RPS27L has been identified as a p53-inducible modulator of cell fate [19], [20]. Therefore, we investigated the clinical meaning and cellular effects of RPS27L expression and the possible mechanisms underlying its involvement in the clinical outcomes of CRC.
We used quantitative real-time RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) to quantify the heterogeneity of fecal RPS27L levels in intermediate-stage CRC patients, and the differential expression of RPS27L was correlated with their clinical outcomes. RPS27L expression in LoVo cells with wild-type p53 was manipulated to examine the possible cellular responses in vitro by analyzing the changes in the cell phases, their apoptotic functions, and DNA repair.
Materials and Methods
Fecal and Tissue Specimens
Solid fecal samples from 80 sporadic CRC patients (42 at stage II and 38 at stage III), obtained at the Cathay General Hospital or Taipei Veterans General Hospital, were collected before surgery or any chemotherapy. Fecal total RNA was prepared according to our previously reported protocol, using an RNA extraction kit (Bioman Scientific, Taipei, Taiwan) with some modifications [21] (Methods S1). The cell phases in the CRC tissue samples (n = 68) and the patient survival data (n = 71) were acquired from the patients whose fecal samples were analyzed. Another six stage III CRC tissues were collected for immunohistochemical staining to determine the expression of p53 and RPS27L proteins. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Cathay General Hospital. The ethics committees, the Institutional Review Board of Cathay General Hospital, approved this consent procedure. All participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Follow-up data were obtained prospectively, and the mean follow-up time was 39.0 months (SD, 3.1; median, 28.3).
Lentivirus-based RNA Interference (RNAi) and Overexpression of RPS27L
The lentiviral particles generated to silence RPS27L (NM_015920) (pLK0.1-RPS27L, TRCN0000117608: GCCTAGTACAAAGTCCAAATT), to silence RPS27 (NM_001030) (pLK0.1-RPS27, TRCN0000117596: GAAGAGGAAACACAAGAAG), or to overexpress RPS27L (pLKO AS3w.puro, containing RPS27L cDNA) were obtained from the National RNAi Core Facility located at the Institute of Molecular Biology/Genomic Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. pLK0.1-Luc (TRCN0000072246) was used as the control. Various colonic cell lines were infected with each lentivirus using the protocol of the RNAi Core Facility. Briefly, 8.5×105 colonic cells were grown in a 10 cm plate for 24 hours, and then infected with lentivirus at a multiplicity of infection of 3. Stable infected cells were selected and maintained in medium containing 2 µg/mL puromycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Changes in the expression of the target genes were determined with qRT–PCR or immunoblotting (Methods s1).
Apoptosis Assay
At 24 hours before the VP16 (also known as etoposide or VP-16-213; a topoisomerase II inhibitor) treatment, the cells were seeded into 16-well chamber slides at a density of 5×103 cells per well. Either RPS27L-expressing (shLuc) or RPS27L-lacking (shRPS27L) LoVo cells were treated with 10 µM VP16 for 48 hours. To identify apoptosis-positive cells, the cells were stained with an annexin-V/PI double staining assay, with the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with a minor modification. Briefly, the cells were washed with wash buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2) after incubation for 15 minutes in binding buffer containing 5 µL of annexin V–FITC and 5 µL of PI at room temperature in the dark. Additional evidence for the occurrence of apoptosis was obtained using the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). The variations in ΔΨ were revealed via microscopic fluorescence using a MitoLight Apoptosis Detection Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) containing 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with minor modifications. First, 6×104 colonic cells per well were incubated and treated with VP16, as described above. After incubation for 24 hours with VP16, each sample was treated with diluted MitoLight reagent (0.2 µL of MitoLight and 180 µL of deionized water) and 20 µL of 10× incubation buffer for 15 minutes at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The highly negative membrane potential in the mitochondria produces orange-red fluorescence from JC-1, and the loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential results in green fluorescence, with the loss of the red fluorescence. The levels of cleaved PARP protein were determined on immunoblots (Methods s1).
γ-H2AX Foci Formation Assay
After 5×104 LoVo cells per well had been incubated for 24 hours, DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) were induced in these cells with 10 µM VP16. The cells’ ability to repair the DSBs was determined by staining them with anti-γ-H2AX antibody using the OxiSelect DNA Double Strand Break Staining Kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with some minor changes. Briefly, the cells were allowed to recover by removing the DSB inducer for the indicated periods. The DSBs revealed (as γ-H2AX foci) appeared as green fluorescence, and the nuclei were visualized by counterstaining them with DAPI (4′-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole). The green fluorescence indicating γ-H2AX foci was visualized with Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended (ver. 11.0; Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) in 100–200 randomly chosen cells. A threshold was determined by measuring similar levels of green color in cells that had recovered over different periods (0 hours, 2 hours, or 4 hours). The results are presented as the percentages of cells emitting fluorescence above the threshold level.
Statistical Analysis
Survival curves and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Variables with P-values ≤ 0.1 in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate model of the Cox proportional hazards analysis, using an enter method for survival analysis. Differences in gene expression and in the numbers of the γ-H2AX foci were compared using Student’s t test. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS, Somers, NY). The MedCalc statistical software package (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used to generate the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The data shown here are representative of at least three experiments with similar results, and P-values <0.05 are considered significant.
Results
Clinical Significance of RPS27L in CRC
The level of fecal RPS27L correlated positively with the percentage of CRC cells of intermediate-stage CRC patients in S phase (rs = 0.259; P = 0.033, Pearson correlation test). We performed a ROC curve analysis and stratified the patients into two groups using the fecal RPS27L level of 0.0014, for which a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.99) and a specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66–0.86) were achieved, to predict the prognosis of patients. The area under the ROC curve for fecal RPS27L was 0.733 (P = 0.017), with a 95% CI of 0.623–0.826 (Figure 1A). The survival rates were compared between the RPS27L+ (n = 51; ≥ 0.0014) and RPS27L− groups (n = 20; <0.0014); the five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was higher in the RPS27L+ group (97.1% ±2.8%) than in the RPS27L− group (69.6% ±12.9%; P = 0.028, log-rank test). No relationship was evident between the RPS27L+ group and other clinicopathological parameters (Table 1). However, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed that the fecal RPS27L level was an independent prognostic factor (hazards ratio, 0.086; 95% CI, 0.009–0.852; P = 0.036) for DSS of intermediate-stage CRC patients (Table 2). In addition, three nonrecurrent patients (stage III) with favorable prognoses (survival >8 years) displayed intense immunohistochemical staining for p53 and RPS27L in tissue sections (Figure 1B, patients 1–3). Three other stage III patients, who suffered recurrence within one year after surgery and died after the first recurrence (survival <4 years), were also positive for p53 protein in their tumor cells, but the expression of RPS27L protein was weak at the corresponding positions (Figure 1B, patients 4–6).
(A) Clinical meaning of RPS27L mRNA in feces. Levels of RPS27L mRNA was relatively quantified by qRT-PCR. The points on the receiver operating characteristic curve (black inset) represented the sensitivity and (1-specificity) for DSS. Kaplan–Meier estimated of DSS dependent on RPS27L mRNA levels (RPS27L–, <0.0014; RPS27L+, (0.0014) in feces of CRC patients. (B) Protein levels of p53 and RPS27L in CRC tissues. Each sample was stained with anti-p53 and anti-RPS27L antibodies from two adjacent sections. Non-recurrent patients: patients 1 to 3, survival >8 y; Recurrent patients: patients 4 to 6, survival <4 y. All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. The same field of the inset at low magnification (40×) was shown at higher magnification (200×). Arrows, the corresponding positions for each patient.
Translocation of RPS27L in Colorectal Cancer Cells
To investigate the cellular function of RPS27L, we infected LoVo cells, a wild-type p53-expressing cell line from a stage at stage III CRC, using a lentivirus-mediated short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to efficiently knock down RPS27L expression (shRPS27L) or a control shRNA (shLuc) (Figure S1). Immunocytochemical staining for endogenous RPS27L was positive in the cytoplasm of the shLuc-infected LoVo cells but was negative in the cells infected with shRPS27L (Figure 2A). The cytoplasmic RPS27L was translocated into the nuclei of 10 µM VP16-treated LoVo cells, and the intense staining for RPS27L protein in the nuclei is shown in Figure 2B. This VP16-induced change was also observed during the immunodetection of RPS27L in the original LoVo cells (Figure 2C).
(A) Cellular localization of RPS27L. RPS27L was immuno-stained in various LoVo cells. (B) Nuclear induction of RPS27L using 10 (M VP16. Arrows in insets (a and b) indicated condense nuclear RPS27L-stains. (C) Immuno-detection of RPS27L in various nuclear extracts. The nuclear extract was prepared from synchronized LoVo cells with VP16 as indicated. shLuc, RPS27L-expressing cells; shRPS27L, RPS27L-lacking cells, overRPS27L, RPS27L-overexpressing cells. Anti-RPS27L antibody, 1∶2000.
Cellular Effects of Down-regulated RPS27L in Colorectal Cancer Cells
We next analyzed the cellular effects of RPS27L by overexpressing RPS27L in LoVo cells (overRPS27L) (Figure S1). Similar cell-cycle regulation was observed in the VP16-free cells (independent of RPS27L expression) as reported in previous studies (Figure 3A) [22]. When the DNA of the synchronized cells was damaged by VP16 in complete medium, the numbers of cells in the S and G2/M phases increased according to the expression of RPS27L (shLuc or overRPS27L). However, another similar RP, RPS27, did not alter the size of the S-phase population, regardless of the level of RPS27 expression following VP16 treatment (Figure S2). Simultaneous measurements of the DNA content and the amount of BrdU-labeled DNA indicated that there were fewer cells with active DNA synthesis among the RPS27L-lacking cells (21% in shRPS27L) following treatment with 10 µM VP16 (Figure 3B). In contrast, both the RPS27L-expressing and RPS27L-overexpressing cells had a higher proportion of cells with active DNA synthesis (32% in shLuc and 37% in overRPS27L) under identical conditions (Figure 3B).
(A) Cell cycle regulation. Cell phases were determined following an indicated VP16 treatment. (B) Cells with newly synthesized DNA under VP16 treatment. The percentage of BrdU-positive cells (blue spots) was determined following an indicated VP16 treatment. (C) Annexin-V/PI double-staining assay. Arrows indicated annexin V-FITC and PI positive cells. VL, visible light; PI, propidium iodide. Green spot, annexin V-FITC; red spot, PI. (D) Cells with JC-1 stain. Arrows indicated the red granular pattern of JC-1 aggregation. (E) Immuno-detection of PARP cleavage. Cleaved PARP, 89 kDa; GAPDH, 36 kDa. shLuc, RPS27L-expressing cells; shRPS27L, RPS27L-lacking cells; overRPS27L, RPS27L-overexpressing cells.
The apoptotic activity of RPS27L in LoVo cells was assessed. Briefly, the control cells (shLuc) were negative for annexin V–FITC. The RPS27L-lacking cells (shRPS27L) contained more annexin-V-positive cells and displayed a late apoptotic (or necrotic) stage when doubly positively stained (annexin V and PI) (Figure 3C). Moreover, living cells expressing RPS27L were detected using the red granular pattern of JC-1 aggregation in cells treated with 10 µM VP16 (Figure 3D) and increased levels of cleaved PARP were observed with increasing concentrations of VP16 (Figure 3E). In the RPS27L-lacking cells, this red granular pattern did not exist and the highest level of cleaved PARP was observed (Figures 3D and 3E).
DNA Repair Function of RPS27L in Colorectal Cancer Cells
We further quantified the mRNA expression of E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1), RAD51, and the protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic polypeptide (PRKDC) to identify the role of RPS27L in VP16-induced DSBs. In RPS27L-lacking cells, treatment with 10 µM VP16 induced a 63.6% reduction (1.1- to 0.4-fold) in E2F1 expression and a 54.5% reduction (1.1- to 0.6-fold) in RAD51 expression (Figure 4A). Similarly reduced expression of PRKDC (0.8- to 0.5-fold) was also observed under the same treatment conditions. The percentage of cells with intense phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX) foci decreased gradually as the repair time increased from 0 to 4 hours, regardless of whether the LoVo cells expressed RPS27L (Figure 4B). However, a delay in the kinetics of the decreasing intensity of γ-H2AX foci was observed in cells lacking RPS27L expression. Up to 61% of RPS27L-lacking cells contained a high density of γ-H2AX foci after repair for 4 hours, whereas only 17% of RPS27L-expressing cells were above the density threshold for γ-H2AX foci at that time (Figure 4C).
(A) Relative expressions of DNA repair genes. The mRNA levels of E2F1, RAD51, and PRKDC were quantified using qRT-PCR following cells with indicated VP16 treatment. The relative expression of each gene was calculated by comparing that of shLuc cells without VP16 treatment. (B) Representative photos of cells with γ-H2AX foci. Cells were allowed to recover by removing the DSBs inducer for 4 h (100×). A threshold was determined by measuring similar levels of green fluorescence (γ-H2AX foci, uncovered DSBs) between shLuc and shRPS27L cells. Insets (200×): 1 and 4, γ-H2AX foci (also indicated the threshold); 2 and 5, DAPI; 3, merge of 1 and 2; 6, merge of 4 and 5. (C) Statistical difference of γ-H2AX foci in cells. Cells were treated with 10 µM of VP16 for 1 h and recovered for indicated time. Percentage of 100–200 randomly chosen cells whose green fluorescence were higher than threshold were indicated. shLuc, RPS27L-expressing cells; shRPS27L, RPS27L-lacking cells. Data are mean ± SD. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01. Two-to-three independent experiments were performed.
Discussion
Molecular markers may constitute a better basis for selecting therapy than clinical and histopathological criteria [23]. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) are the most widely used markers of CRC [24]. However, high levels of either serum CEA or CA19–9 are considered to indicate an unfavorable prognosis in CRC patients with intermediate-stage disease [25], [26].
In the present study, we focused on CRC patients in the intermediate stages of their disease because adjuvant therapy is important for these patients. We previously reported that the expression of numerous RPs, including RPS27L, differed significantly in the feces of CRC patients; but no significant expression difference was found for RPS27, a member of the same family as RPS27L [15]. We have now shown that intermediate-stage patients with increased fecal RPS27L expression had a higher DSS rate and a much lower hazards ratio.
Currently, we monitor functional p53 by determining the fecal RPS27L status of patients with intermediate-stage CRC. The clinical significance of RPS27L was not only demonstrated in fecal samples, but also in CRC tissue samples. In intermediate-stage CRC, intense RPS27L staining, with an increase in p53 protein, in the CRC tissue was found in patients displaying longer survival. However, patients whose p53 protein failed to activate the expression of RPS27L had poor prognoses, with recurrence and shorter survival. This implies that intermediate-stage CRC patients with higher RPS27L levels, whether in the feces or tissues, have a more favorable prognosis, and consistent expression of p53 and RPS27L was observed in these patients with better prognoses.
This is the first report showing that RPS27L is a potential prognostic marker for CRC. In our clinical samples, the level of fecal RPS27L correlated positively with the percentage of CRC cells in S phase. These clinical data are consistent with our results from synchronized LoVo cells that expressed RPS27L. RPS27L and its homologous protein, RPS27, can interact with the p53–MDM2 axis in various cell types [20]. In the present study, we used RNA interference (shRPS27L) to knock down RPS27L expression in LoVo cells. We found that no difference in RPS27 expression was detected from the cells with or without RPS27L silencing (our unpublished data) and no consistent cellular effect was observed in RPS27L- and RPS27-lacking LoVo cells. Further, shRPS27L does not affect the expression of any other genes, even those (klotho, NM_004795; archaelysin family metallopeptidase 1, NM_133463) with mRNA sequences that have partial matches to shRPS27L (Figure S3). In fact, klotho and archaelysin family metallopeptidase 1 are naturally expressed at low levels in our target CRC cell line, LoVo (data not shown) [27], [28]. Overall, our results confirm that the effects of shRPS27L are specific. In addition, the protein sequence of RPS27L was checked against the human genome in the UCSC genome server [29]. Twenty-nine protein sequences with various degrees of identity (61.6%–98.8%) to RPS27L were identified, but none of these were knocked down by shRPS27L, because of its specific sequence. This once again emphasizes that no protein other than RPS27L can be knocked down by shRPS27L.
Following the confirmation of the specificity of action of shRPS27L, we speculated that p53-responsive RPS27L causes the arrest of the cells in S phase when the cellular DNA is damaged. After DNA damage and p53 were induced by the addition of VP16, BrdU-positive cells in S phase accumulated among the RPS27L-expressing LoVo cells. These findings suggest that RPS27L causes the cells to arrest in S phase following active DNA synthesis, and does not allow these cells to enter M phase. The observation of annexin-V-positive and JC-1-aggregated cells strongly suggests that the DNA-damaging agent, VP16, induces an antiapoptotic effect in cells expressing both wild-type p53 and RPS27L. This antiapoptotic effect was also reflected in the higher levels of cleaved PARP in the RPS27L-lacking cells. The activation of PARP is also essential for the regulation of many cellular processes, including DNA repair and cell death [30].
However, the active DNA synthesis and antiapoptotic effect observed, even when the cellular DNA was damaged, seem incompatible with our clinical data, indicating that patients with higher levels of RPS27L expression have a more favorable prognosis. We hypothesize that nonapoptotic cells with damaged DNA must access a suitable method for DNA DSB repair, and that targeting DNA repair proteins should be widely used in cancer treatment [31]. This can be illustrated by the quantification of two DNA DSB repair genes, RAD51 and PRKDC [32], and one gene that encodes a component of repair complexes, E2F1 [33]. Their reduced expression coincided with RPS27L knockdown after treatment with low-dose VP16. This is consistent with the results that E2F1 plays a functional role in suppressing apoptosis and promoting DNA repair in vivo after DNA damage [34]. Consequently, RPS27L is required to suppress apoptosis and for DNA DSB repair in colonic cells expressing wild-type p53. Moreover, VP16-induced DSBs can induce the accumulation of RPS27L protein in the nuclei of LoVo cells. This suggests that DNA DSB damage plays a critical role in inducing the movement of RPS27L protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Xiong et al. also reported similar results in a study of human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells [20]. We speculate that the translocation of RPS27L protein might be crucial in the regulation of some DNA repair genes. However, further studies are required to clarify the relationship between RPS27L expression and DNA DSB repair genes.
The crucial regulation of RPS27L in DNA DSB repair can also be assessed by measuring the kinetics of the changes in the numbers of γ-H2AX foci [35]. In combination with the results for BrdU incorporation, we suggest that RPS27L participates in DNA DSB repair through a mechanism of homologous recombination, because most BrdU-positive cells were restricted to late S phase [36]. This partly corresponds to the findings of Miquel et al., who showed that a high proportion of CRC cells are unable to repair DNA because of changes in one or more components of the two main DNA-repairing mechanisms, including the homologous recombination pathway [37].
Conclusions
Elevated p53-responsive RPS27L accumulation in the nucleus may improve the prognoses of certain CRC patients, possibly through its effect on DNA repair in colonic cells. RPS27L accumulation can be observed in the feces. By integrating clinical, molecular, and cellular data, our study has demonstrated that fecal RPS27L may be an index of prognosis in CRC patients and may guide personalized therapeutic strategies, especially in patients with intermediate-stage CRC.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Efficient changes of RPS27L expression by conducting lentivirus-mediated experiments in LoVo cells. Stable RPS27L-expressing (shLuc), RPS27L-lacking (shRPS27L), and RPS27L-overexpressing (overRPS27L) LoVo cells were acquired by various Lentivirus infections. RPS27L, 9 kDa; GAPDH, 36 kDa.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067043.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Effect of RPS27 expression on flow cytometry. LoVo cells, which either silenced RPS27 (shRPS27) or infected the control virus (shLuc) were treated with DMSO or 10 µM of VP16. Sorting analyses of propidium iodide (PI)-stained cells by flow cytometry. Approximately 104 cells in different phases of the cell cycle were determined using FlowJo 8.7 software.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067043.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
mRNA sequences with partial matches to shRPS27L. shRPS27L was the RNA interference to knock down RPS27L expression. Each dot meant the identical nucleotide with the sequence of shRPS27L. Ranges of matched sequences in each cDNA were indicated. Ribosomal protein S27-like (RPS27L): NM_015920; klotho: NM_004795; archaelysin family metallopeptidase 1 (AMZ1): NM_133463.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067043.s003
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Drs. Jen-Kou Lin and Shih-Ching Chang (both from Department of Surgery, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital) who informed us the clinical data of some patients and Dr. Yih-Yiing Wu for his superior support in pathology. We also thank National RNAi Core Facility at the Institute of Molecular Biology/Genomic Research Center, Academia Sinica to provide RNAi reagents which were supported by the National Research Program for Genomic Medicine Grants of NSC (NSC 97–3112-B-001–016).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CJH SHY CCC. Performed the experiments: CJH SYT. Analyzed the data: CJH CLL YCC CCC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CJH SHY CCC. Wrote the paper: CJH CCC. Final approval of the version to be published: CCC.
References
- 1. Jass JR (2006) Colorectal cancer: a multipathway disease. Crit Rev Oncog 12: 273–287.
- 2. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319: 525–532.
- 3. Rousseau B, Chibaudel B, Bachet JB, Larsen AK, Tournigand C, et al. (2010) Stage II and stage III colon cancer: treatment advances and future directions. Cancer J 16: 202–209.
- 4. Kosmider S, Lipton L (2007) Adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13: 3799–3805.
- 5. Chun P, Wainberg ZA (2009) Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: The Role of Molecular Markers in Choosing Therapy. Gastrointest Cancer Res 3: 191–196.
- 6. Iacopetta B (2003) TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer. Hum Mutat 21: 271–276.
- 7. Baker SJ, Preisinger AC, Jessup JM, Paraskeva C, Markowitz S, et al. (1990) p53 gene mutations occur in combination with 17p allelic deletions as late events in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 50: 7717–7722.
- 8. Bolderson E, Richard DJ, Zhou BB, Khanna KK (2009) Recent advances in cancer therapy targeting proteins involved in DNA double-strand break repair. Clin Cancer Res 15: 6314–6320.
- 9. Chen F, Wang W, El-Deiry WS (2010) Current strategies to target p53 in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 80: 724–730.
- 10. Ofir-Rosenfeld Y, Boggs K, Michael D, Kastan M, Oren M (2008) Mdm2 regulates p53 mRNA translation through inhibitory interactions with ribosomal protein L26. Mol Cell 32: 180–189.
- 11. Panić L, Tamarut S, Sticker-Jantscheff M, Barkić M, Solter D, et al. (2006) Ribosomal protein S6 gene haploinsufficiency is associated with activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint during gastrulation. Mol Cell Biol 26: 8880–8891.
- 12. Deming DA, Leystra AA, Farhoud M, Nettekoven L, Clipson L, et al. (2013) mTOR Inhibition Elicits a Dramatic Response in PI3K-Dependent Colon Cancers. PLoS One 8: e60709.
- 13. Figarola JL, Rahbar S (2013) Small-molecule COH-SR4 inhibits adipocyte differentiation via AMPK activation. Int J Mol Med 31: 1166–1176.
- 14. Kapoor NR, Ahuja R, Shukla SK, Kumar V (2013) The HBx protein of hepatitis B virus confers resistance against nucleolar stress and anti-cancer drug-induced p53 expression. FEBS Lett 587: 1287–1292.
- 15. Huang CJ, Chien CC, Yang SH, Chang CC, Sun HL, et al. (2008) Faecal ribosomal protein L19 is a genetic prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. J Cell Mol Med 12: 1936–1943.
- 16. Tien LT, Chien CC, Yang SH, Lin CM, Wu YY, et al. (2010) p53-Dependent Expression of Ribosomal Protein S27-Like in Colorectal Cancer. Fu-Jen J Med 8: 11–17.
- 17. Thomas EA, Alvarez CE, Sutcliffe JG (2000) Evolutionarily distinct classes of S27 ribosomal proteins with differential mRNA expression in rat hypothalamus. J Neurochem 74: 2259–2267.
- 18. Fernandez-Pol JA (2011) Conservation of multifunctional ribosomal protein metallopanstimulin-1 (RPS27) through complex evolution demonstrates its key role in growth regulation in Archaea, eukaryotic cells, DNA repair, translation and viral replication. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 8: 105–126.
- 19. Li J, Tan J, Zhuang L, Banerjee B, Yang X, et al. (2007) Ribosomal protein S27-like, a p53-inducible modulator of cell fate in response to genotoxic stress. Cancer Res 67: 11317–11326.
- 20. Xiong X, Zhao Y, He H, Sun Y (2011) Ribosomal protein S27-like and S27 interplay with p53-MDM2 axis as a target, a substrate and a regulator. Oncogene 30: 1798–1811.
- 21. Chien CC, Chen SH, Liu CC, Lee CL, Yang RN, et al. (2007) Correlation of K-ras codon 12 mutations in human feces and ages of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Transl Res 149: 96–102.
- 22. Zou J, Luo H, Zeng Q, Dong Z, Wu D, et al. (2011) Protein kinase CK2α is overexpressed in colorectal cancer and modulates cell proliferation and invasion via regulating EMT-related genes. J Transl Med 9: 97.
- 23. Fariña-Sarasqueta A, van Lijnschoten G, Moerland E, Creemers GJ, Lemmens VE, et al. (2010) The BRAF V600E mutation is an independent prognostic factor for survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients. Ann Oncol 21: 2396–2402.
- 24. Yang SH, Lin JK, Lai CR, Chen CC, Li AF, et al. (2004) Risk factors for peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 87: 167–173.
- 25. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Kokuba Y, Satoh T, Ozawa H, et al. (2008) Diminishing impact of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in prognosis of Dukes’ C colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 28: 1933–1941.
- 26. Svobodova S, Topolcan O, Holubec LJ, Levy M, Pecen L, et al. (2011) Parameters of biological activity in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 31: 373–378.
- 27. Pan J, Zhong J, Gan LH, Chen SJ, Jin HC, et al. (2011) Klotho, an anti-senescence related gene, is frequently inactivated through promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol 32: 729–735.
- 28. Díaz-Perales A, Quesada V, Peinado JR, Ugalde AP, Alvarez J, et al. (2005) Identification and characterization of human archaemetzincin-1 and -2, two novel members of a family of metalloproteases widely distributed in Archaea. J Biol Chem 280: 30367–30375.
- 29. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, et al. (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12: 996–1006.
- 30. Herceg Z, Wang ZQ (2001) Functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in DNA repair, genomic integrity and cell death. Mutat Res 477: 97–110.
- 31. Tell G, Wilson DMr (2010) Targeting DNA repair proteins for cancer treatment. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 3569–3572.
- 32. Hansen LT, Lundin C, Spang-Thomsen M, Petersen LN, Helleday T (2003) The role of RAD51 in etoposide (VP16) resistance in small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 105: 472–479.
- 33. Maser RS, Mirzoeva OK, Wells J, Olivares H, Williams BR, et al. (2001) Mre11 complex and DNA replication: linkage to E2F and sites of DNA synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6006–6016.
- 34. Chen D, Yu Z, Zhu Z, Lopez CD (2008) E2F1 regulates the base excision repair gene XRCC1 and promotes DNA repair. J Biol Chem 283: 15381–15389.
- 35. Takahashi M, Koi M, Balaguer F, Boland CR, Goel A (2011) MSH3 mediates sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. J Biol Chem 286: 12157–12165.
- 36. Jackson SP, Bartek J (2009) The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461: 1071–1078.
- 37. Miquel C, Jacob S, Grandjouan S, Aimé A, Viguier J, et al. (2007) Frequent alteration of DNA damage signalling and repair pathways in human colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Oncogene 26: 5919–5926.