Figures
Abstract
Compared with CO2, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are potent greenhouse gases in terms of their global warming potentials. Previous studies have indicated that land-use conversion has a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions. However, little is known regarding the impact of converting rice (Oryza sativa L.) to vegetable fields, an increasing trend in land-use change in southern China, on CH4 and N2O fluxes. The effects of converting double rice cropping to vegetables on CH4 and N2O fluxes were examined using a static chamber method in southern China from July 2012 to July 2013. The results indicate that CH4 fluxes could reach 31.6 mg C m−2 h−1 under rice before land conversion. The cumulative CH4 emissions for fertilized and unfertilized rice were 348.9 and 321.0 kg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively. After the land conversion, the cumulative CH4 emissions were −0.4 and 1.4 kg C ha−1 yr−1 for the fertilized and unfertilized vegetable fields, respectively. Similarly, the cumulative N2O fluxes under rice were 1.27 and 0.56 kg N ha−1 yr−1 for the fertilized and unfertilized treatments before the land conversion and 19.2 and 8.5 kg N ha−1 yr−1, respectively, after the land conversion. By combining the global warming potentials (GWPs) of both gases, the overall land-use conversion effect was minor (P = 0.36) with fertilization, but the conversion reduced GWP by 63% when rice and vegetables were not fertilized. Increase in CH4 emissions increased GWP under rice compared with vegetables with non-fertilization, but increased N2O emissions compensated for similar GWPs with fertilization under rice and vegetables.
Citation: Yuan Y, Dai X, Wang H, Xu M, Fu X, Yang F (2016) Effects of Land-Use Conversion from Double Rice Cropping to Vegetables on Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes in Southern China. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155926
Editor: Upendra M. Sainju, Agricultural Research Service, UNITED STATES
Received: April 7, 2015; Accepted: May 6, 2016; Published: May 19, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Yuan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB417103) (Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China http://www.most.gov.cn/) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41001179)(National Natural Science Foundation of China http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/). Both funders were received by XD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Methane and nitrous oxide are two important greenhouse gases that have 25 and 298 times higher global warming potentials (GWPs), respectively, than CO2 in a time horizon of 100 years [1]. Since 1750, the atmospheric CH4 concentration has increased by 150% [1]. In addition, the concentration of atmospheric N2O has increased steadily at a rate of 0.73 ± 0.03 μg kg-1 yr-1 over the last three decades [1]. Agricultural practice is one of the major sources for these emissions, accounting for 50 and 60% of the total global CH4 and N2O emissions, respectively [2]. Agricultural practices contribute approximately 50 and 92% of the total CH4 and N2O emissions, respectively, in China [3].
Rice and vegetables are major crops grown in southern China. Because of the different growing conditions (standing water in rice vs. aerobic condition in vegetables), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be different between the two cropping systems [4–6]. In standing water or anaerobic condition, CH4 is emitted under rice primarily through aerenchyma, diffusion, and ebullition [7]. Nitrous oxide is emitted through denitrification in water-logged condition under rice [8] and the emissions can be pronounced when flooded fields are drained or N fertilized [9]. Studies indicate that CH4 emissions can be higher and N2O emissions lower under rice than other crops [5, 10]. Nishimura et al. [4, 5] found that the cumulative CH4 fluxes were 2 to 14 g C m−2 yr−1 under lowland rice and ranged from −0.02 to −0.07 g C m−2 yr−1 under upland rice and the double cropping of soybean and wheat. They found that cumulative N2O emissions increased 4.0 to 5.3 times by changing the land-use from lowland rice to upland crops [4]. The total GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions can serve as a useful indicator for comparing the GHG impacts before and after land-use conversion [11].
Land-use conversion from rice to other crops includes variations in crop types, management practices, and changes in soil physical, chemical, and microbial properties. Straková et al. [12] demonstrated that changes in vegetation during land-use change were an important factor affecting the carbon cycle in a peatland. Crop species were also found to have a significant influence on CH4 and N2O emissions [13]. Changes in management practices can also have significant effects on GHG emissions [14–16]. For example, tillage can increase soil respiration, N2O emissions, and CH4 uptake compared with no tillage [15]. Shimizu et al. [16] found that the application of N fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions compared with no application, although it had no effect on CH4 emissions. Changes in soil physical, chemical, and microbial properties such as soil temperature, moisture, pH, redox potential, and microbial communities can also alter CH4 and N2O emissions [17].
China has the world's second largest rice-growing area and the annual total CH4 emissions from Chinese rice cultivation is approximately 7.4 Tg CH4 yr−1 which is approximately 29% of the global CH4 emissions [18]. Large areas of rice fields have been converted to vegetable production due to the acceleration of urbanization and economic development in recent decades. China's total area under vegetable cultivation has grown from 3.5 million ha in 1980 to 17.9 million ha in 2010, whereas the area under rice decreased from 33.3 to 26.5 million ha during the same period [19]. Sun et al. [19] found that converted vegetable fields had greater soil organic C, total N, total P, and available K, but lower microbial biomass C and N than unconverted rice fields. A study conducted in the Yangtze River Delta region found that soil P fractions, especially inorganic P, increased significantly after land-use conversion from rice to other crops [20]. Such changes in soil properties during land conversion may affect CH4 and N2O emissions, but little information is available on the emission patterns and their total GWP impact, especially in southern China.
We hypothesized that land-use conversion from rice to vegetable cultivation would significantly decrease CH4 fluxes and increase N2O fluxes, but have little impact on the total GWP. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine changes in CH4 and N2O fluxes during the conversion of land from long-term rice production to vegetables during three growing seasons from 2012 to 2013 in southern China and (2) measure the overall GWP impact of CH4 and N2O emissions. The results of this study are intended to support the China national GHG inventory for land conversion from rice to vegetable production.
Materials and Method
Site description
The study site was maintained by the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All necessary permits were obtained for this field study. The field study did not involve endangered or protected species. The experimental site was located at the Qianyanzhou Ecological Research Station (QYZ, 26°44′46″ N, 115°04′05″ E) in Jiangxi Province, southern China. The site consisted of a typical red soil (equivalent to Plinthudults in the US Soil Taxonomy) hilly region with a subtropical monsoon climate. According to the meteorological data from 1989 to 2010, the mean air temperature near the site was 18.0°C, and the coldest and warmest months were January (with the temperature range of −0.8 to 18.9°C) and July (with a temperature range of 25.1 to 30.9°C), respectively. The region receives an average total annual precipitation of 1509 mm. Double cropping of rice in a year is the primary cropping system in this area, but a large area under rice was converted to vegetable cultivation recently for economic reasons. The soil had 580, 310, and 110 g kg−1 sand, silt, and clay, respectively. Other soil properties at the initiation of the experiment are shown in Table 1.
Experimental design
The experimental site had been continuously cultivated with rice for approximately 10 yr before land-use conversion occurred in 2012. In July 2012, we converted a portion of the area under rice to vegetable production by draining water from the field while leaving the remaining land under rice. The double-rice system, which is comprised of early rice (transplanted in April and harvested in late July) and late rice (transplanted in late July and harvested in November), was adopted as usual with a fallow in the winter. The late and early rice were transplanted at a plant population of 235000 ha−1 with a spacing of 25 × 17 cm. The converted vegetable areas were planted with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) (planted in July and harvested in October) corresponding to late rice, white radish (Raphanus sativus L.) (planted in October and harvested in March) corresponding to fallow, and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) (planted in April and harvested in July) corresponding to early rice at a population of 143000 plants ha−1 with a spacing of 35 × 20 cm. Each cropping system had two fertilization levels, e.g., conventional fertilization and no fertilization. Thus, the experiment included four treatments in a split plot arrangement in randomized complete block design with four replications. Land use (or crop type) was the main plot and fertilization was the split-plot treatment.
The treatments included vegetable with (VF) and without fertilization (VNF) and rice with (RF) and without fertilization (RNF). Each plot had an area of 120 m2 (10 m × 12 m). The rates of N, P, and K applied through urea (46% N) and compound fertilizer (15% N, 6.5% P, and 12.5% K) to early and late rice and vegetables are shown in Table 2. Fertilizer was broadcast before tillage, irrigation or rainfall. Conventional tillage was carried out at the beginning of each growing season. The vegetable plots were plowed manually with hoes and the rice plots were tilled with a plow attached to hand tractor to a depth of 20 cm. Herbicide (1.5 kg ha−1 metolachlor, C15H22ClNO2) was applied to vegetables after sowing or transplanting in each growing season. For rice, bensulfuron methyl (C16H18N4O7S, 0.007 kg ha−1) and butachlor (C17H26ClNO2, 0.26 kg ha−1) were applied in the third day after transplanting in each growing season. Pesticide was used on August 19, 2012, for cowpea (1.38 kg ha−1 Dichlorvos, C4H7Cl2O4P) and August 26, 2012, for late rice (0.31 kg ha−1 tricyclazole, C9H7N3S), while no pesticide was used for white radish, pepper or early rice. A total of 297 and 120 mm of irrigation water were applied to the rice and vegetables, respectively, during the experiment (Table 2).
Measurement of the CH4 and N2O fluxes
A static chamber was used to simultaneously measure CH4 and N2O fluxes as described by Zheng et al. [21]. The chamber was comprised of two parts: a cylindrical steel anchor and a cover (Fig 1). The heights of the anchor for rice and vegetables were 18 and 13 cm, respectively, and internal diameter was 50 cm. The cover had heights of 40 cm (used for vegetables) and 70 cm (used for rice) and internal diameter was 50 cm. The anchor was inserted into the soil to a depth of 15 cm for rice and 10 cm for vegetables (Fig 1). The bottom part of the anchor inserted into the soil contained holes for water and nutrient exchange between inside and outside of the anchor. The groove on the upper part of the anchor was equipped with a sealing strip to ensure that gas does not leak from the joint of the anchor and the cover box when gas samples were collected. The anchor was kept in place throughout the entire study period, except during tillage and planting. Five seedlings of rice or three seedlings of vegetables were planted inside the anchor. The planting density inside the chamber was similar to that of the crop planted outside. The cover had ports for ventilation and gas sampling (Fig 1). The cover was placed tightly above the anchor during gas sampling and removed after sampling. Before starting the experiment, measurements of CH4 and N2O fluxes in the bare soil from the chambers with two different heights showed that the height had no significant effect on gas fluxes. A tin foil reflective coating was used to cover the chamber to minimize solar heating and fluctuations in the headspace temperature.
Five gas samples were collected from each chamber using 100 ml plastic syringes at 10-min interval twice each week between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM throughout the growing season. Immediately after tillage, fertilization, irrigation or drainage, however, samples were collected daily for one week. The gas samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC System, 7890A, Agilent Technologies) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) and a flame ionization detector (FID). The CH4 and N2O fluxes were calculated from linear or nonlinear changes in the gas concentrations over time [22, 23]. The lowest accepted correlation coefficient (r) value for the regression of CH4 and N2O evolutions was 0.87. When the absolute value of r from the nonlinear model minus that from the linear model was equal to or less than 0.0002, the fluxes from the linear model were adopted and vice versa.
Measurement of environmental factors and yields
The air temperature inside the chamber headspace was measured with a thermometer placed inside the chamber when the gas samples were collected. The soil temperature and water content were recorded to a 5 cm depth with a probe installed near the chamber, and the data were collected with an automatic data logger. The standing water depth in the rice fields was monitored using a steel ruler when the fields were flooded. The air temperature and precipitation data were collected from an on-site automatic meteorological station adjacent to the experimental plots. Both vegetable and rice were manually harvested. All of aboveground crop biomass was harvested and no harvested crop straw was incorporated into the soil. To determine yields, the weights of the rice grain and vegetables were recorded from a 1 m2 area at harvest. The grain or vegetable samples, which had masses of approximately 100 g, were oven dried to a constant weight at 65°C for 24 h after determining the wet weight, which was used as conversion factor to determine rice grain and vegetable yields.
Data analysis
The seasonal or annual cumulative emissions of CH4 and N2O were computed as the sum of the daily CH4 and N2O fluxes, respectively. For the days when measurements were not obtained, we calculated the emissions by linear interpolation using the data from nearest days. The total GWP (g CO2 eq m−2) impact was calculated as = (CH4 emissions × 25) + (N2O emissions × 298). A direct emission factor (EFd) of applied N fertilizer was calculated for N2O as the difference between the total emissions from the fertilized and the unfertilized treatments divided by the amount of N applied [24–26].
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Duncan test to separate means was used to analyze the difference in the soil properties between the treatments prior to the conversion. An analysis of the repeated measures in the mixed model was used to analyze the data on the CH4 and N2O fluxes, where land use and fertilization were set as fixed effects, replication as a random effect and the sampling time as a repeated measure variable. The model was also used to analyze the differences in the crop yields and GWPs among the treatments. Means were separated by using Duncan’s test when the treatments and interactions were significant. Exponential or linear regression analyses were used to identify correlations between the gas fluxes and the soil temperature or water content. The differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Environmental variables and crop yields
Air and soil temperatures showed similar seasonal variations during the experimental period (Fig 2). Maximum (approximately 31°C) and minimum (approximately −1°C) air temperatures were observed in July and January, respectively. Similarly, soil temperature reached maximum (approximately 34°C) and minimum (approximately 8°C) values in August and December, respectively. Lag effects of soil temperature had been observed in previous studies [27]. Total annual precipitation was 1537 mm. The number of precipitation days was 177, with intense precipitation during August-September 2012 and April-May 2013.
The rice and vegetables yields are presented in Table 3. The land use had a significant effect on crop yields. Yield was greater with rice than vegetables in seasons 1 and 3. Fertilization and its interaction with land use had no effect on the crop yields. Increased soil residual N, P, and K after the harvest of the previous crop may have resulted in non-significant effect of fertilization on crop yields [28], as fertilization rates to crops in each year were not adjusted to residual nutrient levels.
The different superscript letters within the same column between different treatments indicate significant differences.
Methane flux
The land-use, date of gas sampling, and their interaction significantly affected CH4 fluxes (Table 4). Under vegetables, CH4 flux remained at very low levels throughout the year, ranging from −0.09 to 0.49 mg C m−2 h−1 (Fig 3). The CH4 flux under late rice peaked during August 2012 and under early rice during May 2013 when standing water level was high. The maximum flux was also greater with late rice (31.6 mg C m−2 h−1) than early rice (23.0 mg C m−2 h−1). During November 2012 to March 2013 when no rice was grown and standing water was absent, CH4 flux dropped to negative values.
Greater standing water level and soil temperature increased CH4 flux under rice than vegetables and under late than early rice. Anaerobic decomposition of soil organic matter in standing water increased CH4 flux under rice compared with vegetables where no standing water was present. Greater CH4 flux in late than early rice was related to higher standing water level due to intense precipitation and increased soil temperature in August 2012 than May 2013 (Fig 2). Previous studies have found that CH4 flux showed a positive response to increased temperature due to enhanced microbial activity [29]. Berger et al. [30] found that standing water level has direct influence on CH4 emissions. Fertilization with N, P, and K had little influence on CH4 flux. Dan et al. [31] found that N fertilization stimulated both CH4 production and CH4 oxidation, resulting in no significant effect on CH4 emissions.
Nitrous oxide flux
Land-use, fertilization, date of gas sampling and their interactions were significant for N2O flux (Table 4). The vegetable fields had significantly higher N2O flux than the rice fields. The N2O fluxes under vegetables primarily peaked after N fertilization and/or irrigation and precipitation (Fig 4). Nitrogen fertilization increased cumulative N2O emissions for the vegetable fields by 126% but not for the rice fields (Fig 5). Maximum N2O peak of 1811 μg N m-2 h-1 was observed under pepper in May 2013 compared with 1036 μg N m-2 h-1 under cowpea in August 2012 and 947 μg N m-2 h-1 under white radish in December 2012. Immediately after heavy precipitation and/or irrigation in August and November 2012 and May 2013, N2O fluxes peaked under unfertilized vegetables similar to those observed for fertilized vegetables.
Treatments are RF, rice with fertilization; NRF, rice with no fertilization; VF, vegetables with fertilization, and VNF, vegetables with no fertilization.
Treatments are RF, rice with fertilization; NRF, rice with no fertilization; VF, vegetables with fertilization, and VNF, vegetables with no fertilization.
Reduction of N2O to N2 through the denitrification process in the anaerobic environment may have decreased N2O flux under rice compared with vegetables [8]. Another possible reason is that increased N uptake by rice due to higher yield (Table 3) may have reduced soil NO3-N and therefore resulted in lower N2O flux under rice than under vegetables. The increased N2O flux immediately after planting under unfertilized vegetables could be the results of soil disturbance due to tillage [32], followed by increased soil water availability due precipitation and irrigation. Many previous studies observed N2O peak events after precipitation [33, 34]. Enhanced microbial activity due to increased soil water content as a result of precipitation and irrigation can increase soil organic matter mineralization and therefore accelerate N2O emissions [35].
Aggregate emissions of methane and nitrous oxide
The GWP was lower under vegetables than under rice when unfertilized, but not different between land uses when fertilized, (Fig 6a and 6b). This is because rice produced higher CH4 flux than vegetables, regardless of fertilization (Fig 3). In contrast, N2O flux was higher under vegetables than under rice and higher with fertilized than unfertilized vegetables (Figs 4 and 5). With or without fertilization, GWP did not alter under rice, but GWP was greater with fertilization than without under vegetables. This suggests that rice and vegetables can be produced by applying chemical fertilizers without emitting net greenhouse gases.
Treatments are RF, rice with fertilization; NRF, rice with no fertilization; VF, vegetables with fertilization, and VNF, vegetables with no fertilization. Bars with different letter at the top are significantly different at P = 0.05 by the least significant difference test.
Different management approaches should be applied for rice and vegetable fields to reduce the GWP. Field should be regularly drained in rice to control CH4 emissions and N fertilization rate should be reduced in vegetables to reduce N2O emissions while maintaining yields. Many studies have shown that water management is one of the most effective options for decreasing CH4 emissions from rice fields [36, 37]. Short-term draining can be an effective way to significantly reduce CH4 emissions [38]. Nitrogen fertilization has already been considered as the best predictor for N2O emissions [39]. Nitrogen fertilization rates of 550 to 600 kg N ha−1 yr−1 have been used for intensive cropping systems in China which do not increase crop yields but degrade soil and environmental quality by increasing soil acidification, N2O emissions, and N leaching to the groundwater [40]. In our study, N fertilization increased N2O emissions, but had no significant effect on the crop yields. One approach to reduce N rate is to apply N fertilizer based on soil NO3-N test to a depth of 60 cm and N mineralization potential. Other is to grow legume cover crops that supply N to the soil.
Conclusions
Land-use conversion from double rice cultivation to vegetables mitigated CH4 emissions but increased N2O fluxes. Fertilization with N, P, and K increased N2O fluxes under vegetables, but not under rice. In contrast, fertilization had no effect on CH4 fluxes, regardless of land use practices. The GWP was lower under vegetables than rice when not fertilized, but not different between land uses when fertilized. Management practices, such as frequent land draining under rice to reduce CH4 emissions and reducing N fertilization rate by applying N fertilizer based on soil test and growing legume cover crop to reduce N2O emissions can reduce GWP under rice and vegetables while maintaining yields.
Supporting Information
S1 Dataset. Data underlying the findings described in the manuscript.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155926.s001
(XLSX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MX HW XD. Performed the experiments: YY XF. Analyzed the data: YY FY XF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XD HW. Wrote the paper: YY XD MX.
References
- 1.
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 2.
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 3. Zhang YS, Cai RS, Fu LL, Liu LJ, Dong HF (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from major agricultural activities in China and corresponding mitigation strategies. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agric & Life Sci) 38: 97–107.
- 4. Nishimura S, Sawamoto T, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Cheng WG, Yagi K (2005) Continuous, automated nitrous oxide measurements from paddy soils converted to upland crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 1977–1986.
- 5. Nishimura S, Yonemura S, Sawamoto T, Shirato Y, Akiyama H, Sudo S, et al. (2008) Effect of land use change from paddy rice cultivation to upland crop cultivation on soil carbon budget of a cropland in Japan. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 125: 9–20.
- 6. Iqbal J, Hu RG, Du LJ, Lu L, Lin S, Chen T, et al. (2008) Differences in soil CO2 flux between different land use types in mid-subtropical China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40: 2324–2333.
- 7. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Seiler W (1986) Effects of vegetation on the emission of methane from submerged paddy soil. Plant and Soil 92: 223–233.
- 8. Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie KE, Massheder J, Rey A (2003) Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science 54: 779–791.
- 9. Kudo Y, Noborio K, Shimoozono N, Kurihara R (2014) The effective water management practice for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and maintaining rice yield in central Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 186: 77–85.
- 10. Liu F, Li TA, Fang XL (2013) Methane emission and its relationship with soil temperature and moisture during rice growth in film mulching upland rice field in South China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2013.
- 11. Shine KP (2009) The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Climatic Change 96: 467–472.
- 12. Straková P, Penttilä T, Laine J, Laiho R (2012) Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water table drawdown on above- and belowground plant litter decomposition: consequences for accumulation of organic matter in boreal peatlands. Global Change Biology 18: 322–335.
- 13. Kaiser EA, Kohrs K, Kücke M, Schnug E, Heinemeyer O, Munch JC (1998) Nitrous oxide release from arable soil: importance of N-fertilization, crops and temporal variation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 1553–1563.
- 14. Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48: 1267–1272.
- 15. Yonemura S, Nouchi I, Nishimura S, Sakurai G, Togami K, Yagi K (2014). Soil respiration, N2O, and CH4 emissions from an Andisol under conventional-tillage and no-tillage cultivation for 4 years. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50: 63–74.
- 16. Shimizu M, Hatano R, Arita T, Kouda Y, Mori A, Matsuura S, et al. (2013). The effect of fertilizer and manure application on CH4 and N2O emissions from managed grasslands in Japan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 59: 69–86.
- 17. Hou AX, Chen GX, Wang ZP, Van Cleemput O, Patrick WH (2000) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice field in relation to soil redox and microbiological processes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 2180–2186.
- 18. Yan XY, Akiyama H, Yagi K, Akimoto H (2009) Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 intergovernmental panel on climate change guidelines. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23.
- 19. Sun B, Dong ZX, Zhang XX, Li Y, Cao H, Cui ZL (2011) Rice to vegetables: short-versus long-term impact of land-use change on the indigenous soil microbial community. Microbial Ecology 62: 474–485. pmid:21298263
- 20. Darilek JL, Huang B, Li DC, Wang ZG, Zhao YC, Sun WX, et al. (2010) Effect of land use conversion from rice paddies to vegetable fields on soil phosphorus fractions. Pedosphere 20: 137–145.
- 21. Zheng XH, Mei BL, Wang YH, Xie BH, Wang YS, Dong HB, et al. (2008) Quantification of N2O fluxes from soil—plant systems may be biased by the applied gas chromatograph methodology. Plant and Soil 311: 211–234.
- 22. Hutchinson GL, Livingston GP (1993) Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes. Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change ASA Spec Publ 55: 63–78.
- 23. Yao ZS, Zheng XH, Dong HB, Wang R, Mei BL, Zhu JG (2012) A 3-year record of N2O and CH4 emissions from a sandy loam paddy during rice seasons as affected by different nitrogen application rates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 152: 1–9.
- 24. Yao ZS, Zheng XH, Xie BH, Mei BL, Wang R, Butterbach-Bahl K, et al. (2009) Tillage and crop residue management significantly affects N-trace gas emissions during the non-rice season of a subtropical rice-wheat rotation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41: 2131–2140.
- 25.
IPCC (1997) guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: greenhouse gas inventory reference manual. Revised 1996, IPCC/OECD/IGES, Bracknell, UK.
- 26.
IPCC (2000) good practice guidance, uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC/IGES, Kanagawa, Japan.
- 27. Kang S, Kim S, Oh S. Lee D (2000) Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of soil temperature based on topography, surface cover and air temperature. Forest Ecology and Management, 136:173–184.
- 28. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WE, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171: 893–899.
- 29. Macdonald JA, Fowler D, Hargreaves KJ, Skiba U, Leith ID, Murray MB (1998) Methane emission rates from a northern wetland; Response to temperature, water table and transport. Atmospheric Environment 32: 3219–3227.
- 30. Berger S, Jang I, Seo J, Kang H, Gebauer G (2013) A record of N2O and CH4 emissions and underlying soil processes of Korean rice paddies as affected by different water management practices. Biogeochemistry 115: 317–332.
- 31. Dan JG, Krüger M, Frenzel P, Conrad R (2001) Effect of a late season urea fertilization on methane emission from a rice field in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 83: 191–199.
- 32. Pinto M, Merino P, Prado AD, Estavillo JM, Yamulki S, Gebauer G, et al. (2004). Increased emissions of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide following tillage of a perennial pasture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 70: 13–22.
- 33. Zona D, Janssens IA, Aubinet M, Gioli B, Vicca S, Fichot R, et al. (2013). Fluxes of the greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) above a short-rotation poplar plantation after conversion from agricultural land. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology 169: 100–110.
- 34. Molodovskaya M, Singurindy O, Richards BK, Warland J, Johnson MS, Steenhuis TS (2012). Temporal variability of nitrous oxide from fertilized croplands: hot moment analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76: 1728–1740.
- 35. Zheng XH, Wang MX, Wang YS, Shen RX, Gou J, Li J, et al. (2000) Impacts of soil moisture on nitrous oxide emission from croplands: a case study on the rice-based agro-ecosystem in Southeast China. Chemosphere—Global Change Science 2: 207–224.
- 36. Cai ZC, Xing GX, Yan XY, Xu H, Tsuruta H, Yagi K, et al. (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilisers and water management. Plant and Soil 196: 7–14.
- 37. Minamikawa K, Sakai N (2006) The practical use of water management based on soil redox potential for decreasing methane emission from a paddy field in Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 116: 181–188.
- 38. Yagi K, Tsuruta H, Kanda Ki, Minami K (1996) Effect of water management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated methane monitoring. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10: 255–267.
- 39. Millar N, Robertson GP, Grace PR, Gehl RJ, Hoben JP (2010) Nitrogen fertilizer management for nitrous oxide (N2O) mitigation in intensive corn (Maize) production: an emissions reduction protocol for US Midwest agriculture. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15: 185–204.
- 40. Ju XT, Xing GX, Chen XP, Zhang SL, Zhang LJ, Liu XJ, et al. (2009) Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 3041–3046.