Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Preliminary Results of National Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Registry Risk Factor Survey Data

  • Leah Bryan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    LBN4@cdc.gov

    Affiliation Carter Consulting Incorporated, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

  • Wendy Kaye ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    Affiliation McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

  • Vinicius Antao ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    Affiliation Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

  • Paul Mehta ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    Affiliation Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

  • Oleg Muravov ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    Affiliation Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

  • D. Kevin Horton

    Contributed equally to this work with: Leah Bryan, Wendy Kaye, Vinicius Antao, Paul Mehta, Oleg Muravov, D. Kevin Horton

    Affiliation Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, United States of America

Abstract

Background

The National ALS Registry is made up of two components to capture amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases: national administrative databases (Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Health Administration and Veterans Benefits Administration) and self-identified cases captured by the Registry’s web portal. This study describes self-reported characteristics of U.S. adults with ALS using the data collected by the National ALS Registry web portal risk factor surveys only from October 19, 2010 through December 31, 2013.

Objective

To describe findings from the National ALS Registry’s web portal risk factor surveys.

Measurements

The prevalence of select risk factors among adults with ALS was determined by calculating the frequencies of select risk factors—smoking and alcohol (non, current and former) histories, military service and occupational history, and family history of neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, Alzheimer’s and/or Parkinson’s.

Results

Nearly half of survey respondents were ever smokers compared with nearly 41% of adults nationally. Most respondents were ever drinkers which is comparable to national estimates. The majority were light drinkers. Nearly one-quarter of survey respondents were veterans compared with roughly 9% of US adults nationally. Most respondents were retired or disabled. The industries in which respondents were employed for the longest time were Professional and Scientific and Technical Services. When family history of neurodegenerative diseases in first degree relatives was evaluated against our comparison group, the rates of ALS were similar, but were higher for Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and any neurodegenerative diseases.

Conclusions

The National ALS Registry web portal, to our knowledge, is the largest, most geographically diverse collection of risk factor data about adults living with ALS. Various characteristics were consistent with other published studies on ALS risk factors and will allow researchers to generate hypotheses for future research.

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease. Most persons with ALS die within 2–5 years of becoming symptomatic [1]. Approximately 5–10% of ALS cases are estimated to be familial, of which over a dozen genes and loci of major effect have been identified [2]. The etiology of the remaining 90–95% of cases, commonly referred to as sporadic ALS, has challenged researchers since the disease was first described in 1869 by French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot.

In October 2009, the United States (US) government launched its first and only population-based country-wide ALS registry as mandated by the National ALS Registry Act (S. 1382). This National ALS Registry allows researchers to quantify the incidence and prevalence of ALS in the United States, to describe the demographic characteristics of persons with ALS, and to examine risk factors for the disease. The Registry takes a two-pronged approach for tracking ALS cases in the United States by using 1) existing national administrative databases (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Heath Administration, and Veterans Benefit Administration) utilizing records starting from October 19, 2010 and 2) a secure web portal, launched on October 19, 2010, that allows patients to self-enroll [3]. During October 19, 2010–December 31, 2011, a total of 12,187 persons with ALS were identified by the National ALS Registry as living with the disease [4].

Most of what is known about ALS risk factors comes from epidemiological studies; however, the strength of evidence determined by these studies tends to vary. Being Caucasian (non-Hispanic), male, over 60 years, and having a family history of the disease are largely thought to be risk factors for ALS [1, 46]. Several studies have suggested an association between occupational exposures and ALS. The most common exposures investigated are pesticides or agricultural work [714], electromagnetic fields (EMF) [8, 1520], metals (e.g., lead, selenium) [12, 14, 2125], construction work [21], welding, soldering, and electric plating [24], formaldehyde [26], and diesel exhaust [27]. In addition, veterinarians, athletes, hairdressers, and armed forces personnel are professions that have been associated with ALS in an extensive systematic review [28]. Nutritional intake [29], exposure to infectious agents [30], cigarette smoking [31], and physical activity and trauma [32] also have been identified as possible risk factors. While epidemiological studies are necessary for attempting to determine ALS etiology, many studies contain a number of limitations for assessing the risk of developing the disease (e.g., small sample sizes, insufficient power, lack of representativeness, and limited geographic catchment areas).

Unlike previous studies of adults with ALS, the data utilized in this study are the largest collection of risk factor data about adults with ALS. This facilitated a more comprehensive examination of the characteristics among adults living with ALS than has been possible in past research. The primary objective of this paper is to describe the findings of risk factors including cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, military service history, occupational history, and a family history of ALS completed via the National ALS Registry secure web portal.

Methods

Data Collection

Risk factor data were collected using a survey created and validated by the Stanford University School of Medicine’s ALS Consortium of Epidemiologic Studies (ACES) [33]. The survey was divided into shorter modules to facilitate completion over time, because of the possible physical limitations of the study population. Survey data were collected via a secure web portal from adults who have self-identified as having ALS. To verify ALS status, six questions proven to be reliable indicators for accurate ALS diagnoses in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ALS registry were utilized [34]. Adults who satisfied the six validation questions were asked to provide consent by checking a box after reading the consent form, register online and participate in surveys. The study, including the consent form and consent procedures, was reviewed and approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Survey Participation

There were 6,911 adults (age 18 or older) who registered via secure online portal between October 19, 2010 and December 31, 2013. To calculate survey participation rates, the number of adults who completed applicable surveys was divided by the number of registrants. Participation rates varied by survey module: demographics—54.0%; employment history—49.5%; military service history—48.6%; cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption—48.1%; first-degree relative history of ALS, Alzheimer’s disease or Parkinson’s disease diagnosis—46.0%.

Measures

Survey questions used to define survey measures are in the Appendix. Race was collected using Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standard categories. Race was defined as the primary race if only one race was selected. If more than one race was chosen or race was Asian or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, respondents were categorized as Other. If only ethnicity were specified or if respondent did not know race, race was defined as Unknown. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using standard formula—BMI = weight (lb) / [height (in)]2 x 703. To determine change in BMI among survey participants, questions related to current and past BMI were asked. Baseline BMI was defined as the respondent’s BMI at 40 years old. Change in BMI was defined as the difference between current BMI and baseline BMI for respondents diagnosed after 40 years old. This measure was reported for two groups—adults over 40 years whose BMI had decreased or increased/remained the same. Geographic regions were created by combining US Department of Health and Human Services regions [35]. For these groupings, Northeastern region included HHS Regions 1,2,3; Southeastern region included HHS Region 4; Midwestern region included HHS Regions 5,7; Southwestern region included HHS Region 6; and Western region included HHS Regions 8,9,10. Exhaustive list of US states by region can be found in the Appendix. To determine occupational category, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business economy, was implemented. Self-reported family history of select neurodegenerative diseases was defined as having at least one first degree relative that has been diagnosed by a physician with ALS, Alzheimer’s disease and/or Parkinson’s disease. First degree relatives were defined as parent, sibling or child(ren). The occurrence of ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease or any of those neurodegenerative diseases among siblings of adults with ALS was calculated by dividing the number of siblings with each condition by the total number of siblings. The rate among first degree relatives was calculated similarly for the total number of children, siblings and parents reported. Because a control group was not available for this study, the rates among the aforementioned groups were then compared to similar measures found during literature review [6]. Nationally representative estimates of risk factor prevalence among the U.S. general population are presented when applicable. SAS© 9.3 was used to calculate the prevalence of risk factors among adults with ALS [36].

Results

Demographic characteristics of web portal respondents are presented in Table 1. Most respondents reported being 50–69 years of age at registration. Among survey participants, 94% were white, 2% were black, 3% were Other and 60% were men. Most (96%) adults surveyed self-identified as non-Hispanic or non-Latino. Of survey respondents, 72% had completed some college or higher level of education. More than half of all survey responders reported currently living in the Southeast or Midwest regions of the United States. Among survey respondents who were older than 40 years and diagnosed after 40 years, half of respondents experienced a decrease in BMI when compared to their baseline BMI measure. More respondents diagnosed with ALS within two years but less than three experienced a decrease in BMI.

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics among Adults with ALS (October 19, 2010 –December 31, 2013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153683.t001

ALS risk behaviors are presented in Table 2. Among web portal survey respondents, rougly half were smokers. More men were ever smokers. Overall, of the 50% of ever smokers, more than 78% had smoked for more than 10 years and 76% smoked at least 5 pack-years. More men were ever drinkers. Overall, a total of 79% of respondents reported ever drinking; 86% drank at least one alcoholic beverage per month for more than 10 years. Approximately 69% were light drinkers as measured by the number of alcoholic drinks per month.

thumbnail
Table 2. Risk Behaviors among Adults with ALS (October 19, 2010 –December 31, 2013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153683.t002

History of military service is presented in Table 3. Veterans made up 24% of survey respondents with 35% serving in the Army, 23% serving in the Navy and 19% serving in the Air Force. Six percent of service members reported to have served in more than one branch of the military. Of those who have served, 34% have been deployed during times of military conflict. The military conflict with the largest proportion of deployed service members was Afghanistan (59%). Ten percent of those deployed were in Vietnam, and 10% of service members were deployed to more than one location.

thumbnail
Table 3. Military History among Adults with ALS (October 19, 2010 –December 31, 2013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153683.t003

Occupational history is presented in Table 4. Over 33% of respondents were retired and nearly 39% were disabled at the time of registration. Jobs held for the longest time were Teacher, Professor or Educator (9%); Physician, Nurse, Dental or Health Care Worker (7%); Secretary, Administrative Assistant or Receptionist (5%); Engineer, Architect or Draftsperson (5%); Retail Salesperson, Sales Clerk, or Sales Representative (4%).Industries worked for the longest time were Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (11%); Educational Services (11%); Health Care and Social Assistance (11%); Manufacturing (Metal, Electrical, Transport, Professional) (8%); Other Services (except Public Administration) (6%); Construction (6%); and Retail Trade I (Cars, Gas, Furniture, Electronics, Food-Beverage, Clothing) (6%).

thumbnail
Table 4. Occupational History of Adults with ALS (October 19, 2010 –December 31, 2013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153683.t004

Family history is presented in Table 5. The rates of reported disease among siblings of adults living with ALS were lower for ALS, Parkinson’s disease, and all neurodegenerative diseases combined when compared with the rate of reported disease among siblings in the comparison group. However, the rate of disease among siblings was higher in our analysis (60 per 10,000) for Alzheimer’s disease than our comparison group (11 per 10,000). In our analyses, the rates of reported disease among all first degree relatives of adults living with Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, ALS, or any neurodegenerative disease was higher when compared with the rate of reported disease among all first degree relatives in the comparison groups.

thumbnail
Table 5. Family History of Adults with ALS (October 19, 2010 –December 31, 2013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153683.t005

Discussion

Since October 19, 2010, over 35,000 risk factor surveys have been completed by Registry-enrolled persons with ALS. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically diverse collection of risk factor data available about adults with ALS in the United States. Brief surveys about possible risk factors for ALS are available through the Registry’s secure web portal for completion by registrants. Findings from risk factor surveys may provide important insights into the pathology of ALS. Furthermore, the quantity of risk factor data collected helps to eliminate limitations traditionally associated with epidemiological studies (e.g., sample size, representativeness).

Date of registration was automatically captured by the National ALS Registry web portal and was, therefore, more reliable than a respondent-recalled diagnosis date which is subject to recall bias. The definition of diagnosis date may not be consistent if a respondent were to “self-diagnose” and recall the date of ALS symptom onset as his date of diagnosis versus the date that the ALS diagnosis was actually confirmed by a healthcare provider. This difference in time has been shown, on average, to be approximately 12 months[37]. As a result, registration date was used as the standard point of reference in this study. Because most risk factor surveys were completed at the time of registration, for consistency, survey respondent characteristics were described at the same point in time. The date of registration and date of diagnosis differed, on average, by less than two years which did not suggest a need to use date of diagnosis instead of date of registration.

Several studies have indicated that cigarette smoking may be related to the development of ALS [31, 3841]. Smoking is thought to increase the risk of developing ALS through several mechanisms, including inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotoxicity caused by heavy metals and other chemical compounds present in cigarette smoke [22, 42, 43]. However, a definitive link between smoking and ALS has not been proven. Nationally, nearly 41% of adults have smoked in their lifetime[44]. In our study, half of adults were either current or former smokers. Of those ever smokers, more than half (52%) had 15 pack-years or more of smoking history. This level of tobacco exposure may be related to an increased risk of ALS [40, 41]. Additionally, the prevalence of ever smoking was somewhat higher than expected among women in our study (44%) when compared with women nationally (35%)[45] which is consistent with past research that suggests an increased susceptibility to ALS exists among women who smoke [40, 46]. The relationship between alcohol consumption and an increased risk of ALS is unclear. It is unknown whether alcohol consumption increases the risk of developing ALS or has a protective effect (38,40).

Occupational exposures such as military service have been linked with ALS [25, 4750]. Veterans, regardless of branch of the military, deployed during times of combat were found to experience a higher risk of ALS compared to veterans who were not deployed during wartime [48] while another study links deployment to the first Persian Gulf War to ALS [47]. It remains unclear whether that increase is due to exposure to toxic or infectious agents resulting from deployment location or to some more general aspect of military life [47, 48]. Men who served in the military throughout the twentieth century might have been exposed to toxic agents (i.e., N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide, aerosolized lead (DEET, an insect repellant)) and various infectious agents [50]. One suggested hazardous exposure is the occupational exposure to diesel fuel of veterans from a variety of sources that generally occur during military conflict [51]. Nationally, 9% of adults are veterans [52]. In our analyses, veterans comprised 24% of survey respondents and about one-third (34%) of veteran respondents were deployed to at least one military conflict. Over one-half (56%) were deployed to the Afghanistan War and 9% in Persian Gulf Wars I and II combined. The overrepresentation of veterans who participated in the Afghanistan War may be explained by the age distribution of our study population who tended to be younger when compared to other ALS study populations rather than exposure to toxic or infectious agents specific to a deployment location.

As anticipated, given the incapacitating nature of ALS and the average age of diagnosis, more than three quarters of cases reported their employment status at registration as either disabled or retired. Among those reporting longest held occupation, teachers, health care workers, secretaries, salespersons, and engineers were the most common jobs. Although this might indicate that persons with higher education may be more likely to self-register, Gunnarsson et al. reported that office workers and medical service workers were more likely to have died from ALS in Sweden, with odds ratios of 1.8 (95% CI 1.0–3.3) and 1.7 (95% CI 1.0–3.0), respectively [11].

ALS patients also reported industries where they worked for the longest period. “Specialty trade contractors” and “Construction of buildings” appear among the top 10 of those industries. Both of these sub-categories belong to the construction sector, according to NAICS. Fang et al. conducted a case-control study in New England using 109 ALS patients and found an odds ratio of 2.9 (95% CI 1.2–7.2) for construction workers, excluding supervisors [21]. Construction workers may be exposed to many hazardous substances, depending on the specific task performed. These may include welding and electrical work, which have been associated with ALS. Strickland et al. demonstrated an odds ratio of 5.3 (95% CI 1.4–20.1) for workers exposed to welding or soldering materials [24]. Electric current injuries, also a common hazard among construction workers [53], have been associated with ALS in independent studies in the United States (odds ratio = 3.8 [95% CI 1.4–13.0]) [54] and Denmark (standardized mortality ratio = 2.7 [95% CI 1.0–6.0]) [55].

Studies have shown an increased risk of developing ALS among relatives who have a family history of ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and dementia [6, 56, 57]. This increased risk is reported for sporadic ALS cases as well as familiar ALS cases[6]. Previous studies have shown that persons with ALS have higher rates of neurodegenerative diseases among their family members [6, 56]. Because a control group was not available for this study, we compared the rates of disease in our population to those rates presented in the paper by Fallis [6]. Our results were very similar and showed a higher rate of neurodegenerative diseases reported in first degree relatives. It is unclear why the rate of disease in siblings was lower except for Alzheimer’s disease because Alzheimer’s disease was specifically asked and not dementia in general. Although the rates of disease were lower in siblings, they were still higher than the control group in this study. The Fallis study has limitations. Its study universe was a less populated area, Ireland, which may have resulted in smaller disease counts. However, similarities existed between our study and Fallis. While the comparison study does not provide racial data, it is assumed to be largely white because of its study location. The National ALS Registry population was also largely white. In addition, information about the same neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s Disease and ALS was collected. The comparison study also limited its analysis to first-degree relatives, more specifically, siblings. Because of the scarcity of research about the familial occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases among ALS patients for specific types of first-degree relatives, additional research is necessary.

Previous studies have examined an association between an increased rate of BMI reduction and a shorter total disease duration [58, 59]. The distribution of the decrease in BMI relative to the time since ALS diagnosis in our study appeared to be consistent with past research. The decrease in BMI among longer term survivors, respondents who received their ALS diagnosis 3 or more years ago, was equivalent to that of respondents with an ALS diagnosis less than one year ago. This may indicate that respondents with a more rapid decrease in BMI, between one and less than three years, experienced a shorter disease duration that resulted in a survivor bias among adults who were diagnosed three or more years ago. These longer surviving respondents may have had other unique characteristics that facilitated their maintaining sufficient cognitive and physical ability that allowed registration and completion of risk factor surveys. This finding may suggest slower disease progression among this group. Further study is warranted.

There are several known limitations to this study. Our study population tended to differ demographically from the nation. Survey respondents were less racially diverse. This may be the result of ALS being more prevalent among whites and men [60, 61] or a reflection of racial disparity in Internet access and usage [62] which could result in a higher utilization of online ALS-related resources for particular groups. In addition, a majority of survey respondents were educated (74% had some college or higher) which has also been associated with higher Internet use [62]. However, of those who registered, there was no difference in age, sex, or geographic distribution between those who took surveys and those who did not take surveys. The underrepresentation of various demographic groups may result in an underestimation of the prevalence of risk factors among adults living with ALS. It is expected that more representative data will be collected as the Registry web portal matures. In addition, risk behavior surveys described in this study were completed by adults with ALS and not by a similar non-disease population. As a result, more definitive associations could not be tested. Thus, it was not possible to assess whether associations of risk factors of ALS were consistent or biased due to self-registration. However, general population national estimates were used as proxy comparison groups when applicable. Detailed information on specific exposures to hazardous agents and their duration and latency was not collected for occupational and military history risk factors, thereby, limiting the ability to extrapolate these results to a broader population or infer any causative links. Other potential exposures from such things as the use of home pesticides or hobbies were not assessed but have been added to information collected and will be analyzed in the future. Survey data were collected by self-reports which could underestimate negative health behaviors. However, past studies have shown some self-report measures to be sensitive and fairly specific [63, 64]. Answering surveys is voluntary and not everyone who registered took the surveys. In 2012, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System had a median response rate of 45.2% for all states and Washington, DC with a range from 27.7% - 60.4% [65]. Survey participation rates in the National ALS Registry ranged from 43.6%-49.2%, which is within the expected range for this type of research. Additionally, although every attempt was made to include only unique registrations in our analyses, there remains a possibility that duplicate registrations were included. However, further review of the data indicates that very few duplicate registrations likely existed, thus minimizing the effects on the overall conclusions. Results presented here include only National ALS Registry participants who completed risk factor surveys on the secure online web portal and may not be representative of all persons with ALS in the Registry. Lastly, these results were descriptive. Statistical testing including the control of potential covariates and confounders did not occur in this study. As a result, these finding should not be interpreted to suggest causation.

Conclusions

These results encompass data on the largest number of persons with ALS in the United States to date. They were largely consistent with results of reported research on smaller less geographically diverse populations for cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, military service history, occupational history and family history of neurodegenerative diseases. Our findings support the need for further investigation into the association between the development of ALS and a variety of risk factors, including, but not limited to, those presented in this paper. This risk factor data can be used to generate hypotheses to identify areas for future research and further examine the characteristics of adults with ALS.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LB WK VCA PM OM DKH. Analyzed the data: LB. Wrote the paper: LB WK VCA PM OM DKH.

References

  1. 1. Mitsumoto H, Chad DA, Pioro EP. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1998.
  2. 2. Andersen PM, Al-Chalabi A. Clinical genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what do we really know? Nature Reviews Neurology. 2011;7:603–15 pmid:21989245
  3. 3. Antao V, Horton DK. The national amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) registry. Journal of Environmental Health. 2012;75(1):28–30. pmid:22866401
  4. 4. Mehta P, Antao V, Kaye W, Sanchez M, Williamson D, Bryan L, et al. Prevalence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis—United States, 2010–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2014;63(SS07):1–13.
  5. 5. Plato CC, Galasko D, Garruto RM, Plato M, Gamst A, Craig UK, et al. ALS and PDC of Guam Forty-year follow-up. Neurology. 2002;58:765–73. pmid:11889241
  6. 6. Fallis BA, Hardima O. Aggregation of neurodegenerative disease in ALS kindreds. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 2009;10:95–8. pmid:18608094
  7. 7. Bonvicini F, Marcello N, Mandrioli J, Pietrini V, Vinceti M. Exposure to pesticides and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based case-control study. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46(3):284–7. pmid:20847462
  8. 8. Das K, Nag C, Ghosh M. Familial, environmental, and occupational risk factors in development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(8):350–5. pmid:22912943
  9. 9. Furby A, Beauvais K, Kolev I, Rivain JG, Sebille V. Rural environment and risk factors of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case-control study. Journal of Neurology. 2010;257(5):792–8. pmid:20012543
  10. 10. Govoni V, Granieri E, Fallica E, Casetta I. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, rural environment and agricultural work in the Local Health District of Ferrara, Italy, in the years 1964–1998. Journal of Neurology. 2005;252(11):1322–7. pmid:15995797
  11. 11. Gunnarsson LG, Lindberg G, Soderfeldt B, Axelson O. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Sweden in relation to occupation. Acta Neurology Scand. 1991;83(6):394–8.
  12. 12. Johnson FO, Atchison WD. The role of environmental mercury, lead and pesticide exposure in development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30(5):761–5. pmid:19632272
  13. 13. McGuire V, Longstreth WT, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, Checkoway H, Morgan MS, et al. Occupational exposures and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based case-control study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1997;145(12):1076–88. pmid:9199537
  14. 14. Malek AM, Barchowsky A, Bowser R, Heiman-Patterson T, Lacomis D, Rana S, et al. Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study. Neurogenerative Diseases. 2013. Epub November 12, 2013.
  15. 15. Savitz DA, Loomis DP, Tse CK. Electrical occupations and neurodegenerative disease: analysis of US mortality data. Archives of Environmental Health. 1998;53(1):71–4. pmid:9570311
  16. 16. Davanipour Z, Sobel E, Bowman JD, Qian Z, Will AD. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(1):28–35. pmid:9125230
  17. 17. Hakansson N, Gustavsson P, Johansen C, Floderus B. Neurodegenerative diseases in welders and other workers exposed to high levels of magnetics fields. Epidemiology. 2003;14(4):420–6. pmid:12843765
  18. 18. Li CY, Sung FC. Association between occupational exposire to power frequency electromagnetic fields and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review. American Journal of Ind Med. 2003;43(2):212–20.
  19. 19. Noonan CW, Reif JS, Yost M, Touchstone J. Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in case-referent studies of neurodegenerative diseases. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002;28(1):42–8. pmid:11871851
  20. 20. Zhou H, Chen G, Chen C, Yu Y, Xu Z. Association between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields occupations and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(11).
  21. 21. Fang F, Quinlan P, Ye W, Barber MK, Umbach DM, Sandler DP, et al. Workplace exposure and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2009;117(9):1387–92. pmid:19750102
  22. 22. Kamel F, Umbach DM, Hu H, Munsat TL, Shefner JM, Taylor JA, et al. Lead exposure as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurogenerative Diseases. 2005;2(3–4):195–201.
  23. 23. Roelofs-Iverson RA, Mulder DW, Elveback LR, Kurland LT, Molgaard CA. Als and heavy metals: a pilot case-control study. Neurology. 1984;34(3):393–5. pmid:6538286
  24. 24. Strickland D, Smith SA, Dolliff G, Goldman L, Roelofs RI. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and occupational history. A pilot case-control study. Archives of Neurology. 1996;53(8):730–3. pmid:8759978
  25. 25. Sutedja NA, Veldink JH, Fischer K, Kromhout H, Heederik D, Huisman MH, et al. Exposure to chemicals and metals and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2009;10(5–6):302–9. pmid:19922117
  26. 26. Weisskopf MG, Morozova N, O'Reilly EJ, McCullough ML, Calle EE, Thun MJ, et al. Prospective study of chemical exposures and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(5):558–61. pmid:19372290
  27. 27. Pamphlett R, Rikard-Bell A. Different occupations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: is diesel exhaust the link? PLoS One. 2013;8(11).
  28. 28. Sutedja NA, Fischer K, Veldink JH, van der Heijden GJ, Kromhout H, Heederik et al. What we truly know about occupation as a risk factor for ALS: a critical and systematic review. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2009;10(5–6):295–301. pmid:19922116
  29. 29. Wang H, O’Reilly EJ, Weisskopf MG, Logroscino G, McCullough ML, Schatzkin A, et al. Vitamin E intake and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A pooled analysis of data from 5 prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;173(6):595–602. pmid:21335424
  30. 30. Fang F, Chen H, Wirdefeldt K, Ronnevi LO, Al-Chalabi A, Peters TL, et al. Infection of the central nervous system, sepsis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29749. pmid:22216353
  31. 31. Kamel F, Umbach DM, Hu H, Munsat TL, Shefner JM, Sandler DP. Association of cigarette smoking with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. 1999;18(4):194–202. pmid:10364720
  32. 32. Beghi E, Logroscino G, Chiò A, Hardiman O, Millul A, Mitchell et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, physical exercise, trauma and sports: Results of a population-based pilot case-control study. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2010;11(3):289–92. pmid:20433412
  33. 33. ALS Consortium of Epidemiologic Studies (ACES). ALS Consortium of Epidemiologic Studies (ACES): Stanford School of Medicine. Available from: http://aces.stanford.edu/.
  34. 34. Allen KD, Kasarskis EJ, Bedlack RS, Rozear MP, Morgenlander JC, Sabet A, et al. The national registry of veterans with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30:180–90. pmid:18421218
  35. 35. US Department of Health and Human Services. US Department of Health and Human Services Regions Washington, DC [updated June 19, 2006June 10, 2014]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/about/regionmap.html.
  36. 36. SAS Institute. SAS 9.3. 9.3 ed. Cary, NC.
  37. 37. Chio A, Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, Collins J, Simeone JC, Goldstein LA, et al. Global Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of the Published Literature. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41:118–30. pmid:23860588
  38. 38. Armon C. Smoking may be considered an established risk factor for sporadic ALS. Neurology. 2009;73(20):1693–8. pmid:19917993
  39. 39. Weisskopf MG, Mccullough ML, Calle EE, Thun MJ, Cudkowicz M, Ascherio A. Prospective study of cigarette smoking and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;160(1):26–33. pmid:15229114
  40. 40. Nelson LM, Mcguire V, Longstreth WT, Matkin C. Population-Based Case-Control Study of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Western Washington State. I. Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2000;151(2):156–63. pmid:10645818
  41. 41. Gallo V, Bueno-de-mesquita HB, Vermeulen R. Smoking and risk for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: analysis of the EPIC cohort. Annals of Neurology. 2009;65(4):378–85. pmid:19399866
  42. 42. De jong SW, Huisman MH, Sutedja NA. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;176(3):233–9. pmid:22791740
  43. 43. Barber SC, Shaw PJ. Oxidative stress in ALS: Key role in motor neuron injury and therapeutic target. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2010;48 629–41.
  44. 44. Schiller JS, Lucas JW, Peregoy JA. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2011. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2012.
  45. 45. Schiller JS, Lucas JW, Peregoy JA. Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2011. Vital Health Statistics. 2012;10(256).
  46. 46. Alonso A, Logroscino G, Hernan MA. Smoking and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J of Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1249–52.
  47. 47. Haley RW. Excess incidence of ALS in young Gulf War veterans. Neurology. 2003;60:750–6.
  48. 48. Horner RD, Kamins KG, Feussner JR. Occurrence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Gulf War veterans. Neurology. 2003;60:742–9.
  49. 49. Coffman C, Horner RD, Grambow GJ, Lindquist J. Estimating the occurence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Gulf War (1990–1991) veterans using capture-recapture methodology. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;24:141–50. pmid:15650320
  50. 50. Weisskopf MG, OReilly EJ, McCullough ML. Prospective study of military service and mortality from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2005;64:32–7. pmid:15642900
  51. 51. Ritchie GD, Still KR, Alexander WK, Nordholm AF, Wilson CL, Rossi J, et al. A Review of the Neurotoxicity of Selectted Hydrocarbon Fuels. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 2001;4:223–312. pmid:11503417
  52. 52. Abel EL, Kruger ML, Friedl J. How Do Physicians Define "Light", "Moderate", and "Heavy" Drinking? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1998;22(5):979–84.
  53. 53. Cawley JC, Homce GT. Occupational electrical injuries in the United States,1992–1998, and recommendations for safety research. J Safety Res. 2003;34(3):241–8. pmid:12963070
  54. 54. Deapen DM, Henderson BE. A case-control study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986;123(5):790–9. pmid:3962963
  55. 55. Johansesn C, Olsen JH. Mortality from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, other chronic disorders, and electric shocks among utility workers. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1998;148(4):362–8. pmid:9717880
  56. 56. Plato CC, Galasko D, Garruto RM, Plato M, Gamst A, Craig UK, et al. ALS and PDC of Guam: Forty year follow-up. Neurology 2002:765–73. pmid:11889241
  57. 57. Majoor-Krakauer D, Ottman R, Johnson WG, Roland LP. Familial Aggregation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease: Evidence of shared genetic susceptibility. Neurology. 1994;44:1872–7. pmid:7936240
  58. 58. Jawaid A, Murthy SB, Wilson AM, Qureshi SU, Amro MJ, Wheaton M, et al. A decrease in body mass index is associated with faster progression of motor symptoms and shorter survival in ALS. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2010;11(6):542–8. pmid:20500116
  59. 59. Shimizu T, Nagaoka U, Nakayama Y, Kawata A, Kugimoto C, Kuroiwa Y, et al. Reduction rate of body mass index predicts prognosis for survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multicenter study in Japan. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2012;13:363–6. pmid:22632442
  60. 60. Cronin S, Hardiman O, Traynor BJ. Ethnic variation in the incidence of ALS A systematic review. Neurology. 2007;68:1002–7. pmid:17389304
  61. 61. Gundogdu B, Al-Lahham T, Kadlubar F, Spencer H, Rudnicki SA. Racial differences in motor neuron disease. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2014;15(1–2):114–8. pmid:24067242
  62. 62. US Census Bureau. Computer and Internet Use in the United States Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2013 May 2013. Report No.: Contract No.: P20-569.
  63. 63. MacDonald R, Baken L, Nelson A, Nichol KL. Validation of Self-Report of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Status in Elderly Outpatients. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1999;16(3):173–7. pmid:10198654
  64. 64. Irving SA, Donahue JG, Shay DK, Ellis-Coyle TL, Belongia EA. Evaluation of self-reported and registry-based influenza vaccination status in a Wisconsin cohort. Vaccine. 2009;27:6546–9. pmid:19729083
  65. 65. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012 Summary Data Quality Report. Atlanta, GA.