Figures
Abstract
Background
Invasive mucormycosis (IM) is an emerging life-threatening fungal infection. It is difficult to obtain a definite diagnosis and to initiate timely intervention. Mucorales-specific T cells occur during the course of IM and are involved in the clearance of the infection. We have evaluated the feasibility of detecting Mucorales-specific T cells in hematological patients at risk for IM, and have correlated the detection of such cells with the clinical conditions of the patients.
Methods and Findings
By using an enzyme linked immunospot assay, the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells in peripheral blood (PB) samples has been investigated at three time points during high-dose chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Mucorales-specific T cells producing interferon-γ, interleukin-10 and interleukin-4 were analysed in order to detect a correlation between the immune response and the clinical picture. Twenty-one (10.3%) of 204 patients, accounting for 32 (5.3%) of 598 PB samples, tested positive for Mucorales-specific T cells. Two groups could be identified. Group 1, including 15 patients without signs or symptoms of invasive fungal diseases (IFD), showed a predominance of Mucorales-specific T cells producing interferon-gamma. Group 2 included 6 patients with a clinical picture consistent with invasive fungal disease (IFD): 2 cases of proven IM and 4 cases of possible IFD. The proven patients had significantly higher number of Mucorales-specific T cells producing interleukin-10 and interleukin-4 and higher rates of positive samples by using derived diagnostic cut-offs when compared with the 15 patients without IFD.
Conclusions
Mucorales-specific T cells can be detected and monitored in patients with hematologic malignancies at risk for IM. Mucorales-specific T cells polarized to the production of T helper type 2 cytokines are associated with proven IM and may be evaluated as a surrogate diagnostic marker for IM.
Citation: Potenza L, Vallerini D, Barozzi P, Riva G, Gilioli A, Forghieri F, et al. (2016) Mucorales-Specific T Cells in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0149108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108
Editor: Tamás Papp, University of Szeged, HUNGARY
Received: August 31, 2015; Accepted: January 27, 2016; Published: February 12, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Potenza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [grant number AIRC IG-14797], Milan, Italy (ML); the Associazione Italiana Lotta alle Leucemie, Linfoma e Mieloma (AIL)-Sezione ‘‘Luciano Pavarotti’’-Modena-ONLUS (LP and FF); Gilead Fellowship Program 2012–2014 (ML); the Societa` Italiana di Ematologia Sperimentale (SIES, ‘‘Piero Martino’’ awarded to LP); and research funds by Gilead Sciences to ML. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: Mario Luppi received research funds from and served on the advisory board for Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dome, and Pfizer; Leonardo Potenza received research funds and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Pfizer. LP, PB, and ML have applied for a European and US patent regarding clinical applications of the ELISpot assay for the diagnosis of Aspergillus infection [PCT: WO2008/075395A3, EP2094295, IT2007/000867]. LP, DV, PB, FF, and ML have applied for an Italian patent regarding clinical applications of the ELISpot assay for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection (No. MI2010A002224). These do not alter the adherence of authors to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All the other authors have no pertinent commercial relationships related to the manuscript. LP, DV, PB, FF, and ML have applied for an Italian patent regarding clinical applications of the ELISpot assay for the diagnosis of Mucorales infection (No. MI2010A002224). All the other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Invasive mucormycosis (IM) is a severe fungal infection that affects patients with various clinical conditions, all characterized by some degree of impaired immune response, including diabetes, iron overload, organ transplantation and hematologic malignancies [1–6]. The crude mortality rate of IM is as high as 70%, a number that has not decreased over recent years [6–12]. The non-specific clinical presentation of IM is certainly one of the main reasons for this overall poor outcome. Indeed, from a clinical and radiological point of view, IM is indistinguishable from other infections, either fungal or bacterial [1–12]. Thus, a definite diagnosis of IM requires the demonstration of suggestive fungal hyphae in infected tissue together with a positive culture from that tissue. No alternative diagnostic methods exist. However, tissue biopsies are only rarely performed in patients at high risk for IM, due to their coagulopathy/low platelets [5, 10–17].
We and others have previously reported on the presence of specific T cells in patients with invasive infections caused by filamentous fungi [18–22]. These T cells contribute to human immune responses against these fungi, and seem to correlate with the outcome of the infection [19–22]. Specifically, we demonstrated that Mucorales-specific T cells could be detected in three patients with documented IM during the course of the infection. Such T cells could not be demonstrated before the infection or at complete resolution, and were completely absent in 25 controls without IM [20]. These findings suggest that the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells is strongly associated with the occurrence of IM.
In the present study, we have prospectively evaluated the feasibility of monitoring the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing treatment that puts them at high risk for invasive fungal diseases (IFD). Furthermore, we have investigated whether the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells correlates with specific clinical presentation of disease.
Results
A total of 204 patients were enrolled into the study. The median age was 51.8 years (range 17–78). One hundred and four patients (51%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML); 10 (5%) high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome; 28 (13%) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); 3 (2%) severe aplastic anemia, 15 (7%) non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 44 patients (22%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Clinical characteristics of the patients are reported in Table 1.
According to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group (EORTC-MSG) criteria [23], 40 (19%) cases of invasive fungal disease (IFD) were diagnosed during the study period, including 33 (16%) cases of proven or probable invasive aspergillosis (IA), 2 (1%) cases of proven IM, 3 (1.5%) cases of proven fusariosis and 2 (1%) cases of invasive candidiasis. Furthermore, 20 patients were classified as having possible IFD (Fig 1).
IFD = invasive fungal disease. IM = invasive mucormycosis; IA = invasive aspergillosis. Grey boxes indicate the patients with a defined diagnosis considered for the computation of sensitivity, specificity and receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
A total of 598 peripheral blood (PB) samples were analyzed (average 2.93 per patient; range from 1 to 7). In order to study Mucorales-specific T cells producing interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and IL-4, 3 analyses were performed for each sample, resulting in a total of 1794 test results. Peripheral blood samples were obtained at the following time points [median day (minimum–maximum)]: during high dose induction chemotherapy/ immunosuppressive treatment: T1 = +16 (12–45); T2 = +32 (23–60); T3 = +46 (27–75); during alloSCT conditioning, T1 = +37 (12–117); T2 = +74 (20–197); T3 = +101 (40–180).
The ELISpot assay showed the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells in 21 of 204 patients (10.3%) (Figs 1 and 2). Clinical characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 2. Such patients accounted for all the positive samples. Thirty-two (5.3%) samples tested positive: 5 at T1, 13 at T2, 14 at T3.
(A-C). Kinetics of T-cell responses in the patients showing Mucorales-specific T cells. (A) Kinetics of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ (blue); (B) IL-10 (yellow); (C) IL-4 (red) in the 15 patients without IFD (light colours) and in the 6 patients with IFD (dark colours), 2 proven IM and 4 possible IFD, at each time period of the study. The central box represents the values from the lower to upper quartile (25 to 75 percentile). The middle line represents the median. The horizontal line extends from the minimum to the maximum value. Triangles and dots show "outside" and "far out" values, respectively. The vertical axis shows the number of spot-forming cells (SFCs) per million PBMCs producing a specific cytokine. The horizontal axis represents the three time periods, when peripheral blood samples have been obtained.
The median number [spot forming cells (SFCs) / 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with their 25th and 75th percentiles] of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ was: 65 (40–127.5); those producing IL-10: 20 (20–65) and those producing IL-4: 60 (20–114), respectively (Fig 2).
When we correlated the occurrence of Mucorales-specific T cells with the clinical outcome, patients with positive results could be grouped into two categories (Figs 1 and 2). The first group consisted of 15 patients (n = 1–15) with clinical, microbiological and radiological features unlikely to be related to IFD, because they met one of the following criteria: 1) they were diagnosed with proven non-fungal infections; 2) they never developed fever during the study period; 3) their infection resolved without the administration of antifungal agents (Table 2). The second group was composed of 6 patients with proven IM (n = 2) and possible IFD (n = 4), according to the EORTC/MSG criteria (Table 2 and Fig 3) [23].
(A-F). Radiologic findings of patients from group 2 with possible IFD (A–D) and proven IM (E and F). (A) Patient 16. Well shaped nodular lesion of 4.5 cm, with surrounding area of ground glass, and air crescent sign in the posterior part of the upper left pulmonary lobe at HRCT. (B) Patient 17. Pulmonary HRCT demonstrating a small well shaped nodular lesion of the left upper lobe. (C) Patient 18. Pulmonary HRCT showing multiple bilateral well shaped nodular lesions, sometimes surrounded by ground-glass attenuation. Bilateral pleural effusions. (D) Patient 19. HRCT showing a large (4.7 cm) nodular lesion surrounded by an area of ground glass attenuation in the posterior part of the upper left pulmonary lobe. (E) Patient 20. Sagittal sinus CT scan. Soft tissue obliteration of ethmoid and middle meatus, erosion of ethmoid bony lamellae and spheno-etmoidal floor. Obliteration of frontal and sphenoidal sinus. (F) Patient 21. CT of the chest showing a central consolidation surrounded by a rim of ground-glass opacity within a large left hilar pulmonary consolidation (reverse halo-sign appearance). HRCT = high resolution computed tomography.
In the first group, the median number (SFCs/106 PBMCs with their 25th and 75th percentiles) of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ was 62.5 (40–115); those T cells producing IL-10 was 0 (0–20) and those producing IL-4 was 0 (0–28) as well. In this group of patients the differences in the number of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ and IL-10, and IFN-γ and IL-4 resulted significantly different (p = 0.001) (Fig 4A). These findings are indicative of Mucorales-specific immune responses polarized to the production of IFN-γ in this group.
(A,B) Comparison between frequencies of Mucorales-specific T cells in patients without IFD and with proven IM. (A). Box plots showing specific immune responses producing IFN-γ (blue column), IL-10 (yellow column) and IL-4 (red column) in Group 1 patients (n = 15) without IFD. (B). Box plots showing specific immune responses producing IFN-γ (blue column), IL-10 (yellow column) and IL-4 (red column) in the 2 patients with proven IM. The vertical axis shows the number of spot-forming cells (SFCs) per million PBMCs. The horizontal axis represents the cytokine produced by Mucorales-specific T cells. The upper horizontal line represents the upper adjacent value. The upper hinge of the boxes represents the 75th percentile. The middle horizontal line of the boxes represents the median value. The lower hinge of the boxes represents the 25th percentile. The lower horizontal line represents the lower adjacent value. Blue, yellow and red dots are outrange values. * and ▲ = P< 0.05.
The second group was additionally split in the two patients with proven IM and in the four patients with possible IFD. In the 2 patients with proven IM, the median number (SFCs/106 PBMCs with their 25th and 75th percentiles) of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ was 132.5 (122.5–207.5); those T cells producing IL-10 was 43.5 (30–66); those T cells producing IL-4 was 232 (128–355). In these two patients only the difference between Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ- and IL-10 resulted statistically different (p = 0.005).
In the four patients with possible IFD the median number (SFCs/106 PBMCs with their 25th and 75th percentiles) of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ was 40 (10–100); those T cells producing IL-10 was 80 (0–185); those T cells producing IL-4 was 80 (68–180) (Fig 4B).
When we compared the patients without IFD (group 1) with the two patients with proven IM, it resulted that the magnitude of specific immune responses, evaluated either as the number of samples with more than 100 SFCs or as median SFCs, was significantly greater in proven patients. In particular, the number of analysis with ≥ 100 SFCs/106 PBMCs was 10 (7.41%) out of 135 in the first group and 8 (66.6%) out of 12 in the proven patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Moreover, these latter patients showed also significantly higher number of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-4 and IL-10 than the 15 patients without IFD (232 vs 0, p = 0.01; 43.5 vs 0, p = 0.03), suggesting an immune response polarized in a non-protective fashion versus fungi of the order Mucorales (Fig 2).
To verify the hypothesis that Mucorales-specific T cells, and, in particular, those producing type-2 cytokines, were associated with IM, we calculated the proportion of patients correctly "diagnosed" by the ELISpot assay and performed the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, between the cases with a defined diagnosis with or without Mucorales-specific T cells, namely 17 patients versus 167 patients (Fig 1). The sensitivity and specificity of the test resulted 100% and 92%, respectively, when all the three types of Mucorales-specific T cells were considered, and 100% and 94.5% when only Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10 and IL-4 were evaluated (S1 Table and S2 Table). These data suggested that Mucorales-specific T cells producing type 2 cytokine were more suitable to detect IM and were consistent with what observed in the three proven IM cases previously reported [20].
The following cut-offs were derived: 30 SFCs/106 PBMCs for Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10; 70 SFCs/106 PBMCs for Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-4 and 30 SFCs/106 PBMCs when both Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10 and IL-4 were considered (S1 Fig).
To evaluate whether the 4 positive possible IFD could be upgraded to a higher degree of suspicion for IM, we analysed the sample positivity rates in these patients and made the comparison with patients with a proven diagnosis, by applying the derived cut-offs. When Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10 or IL-4 or both in combination were considered, the rates of positive samples in the 4 patients with possible IFD resulted 45% (5 out of 11) for each analysis. Such rates were significantly higher than those obtained in the 15 patients without IFD, namely 14% (5 out of 36) (p = 0.04), 8% (3 out of 36) (p = 0.01), 5.5% (2 out of 36) (p = 0.004), respectively, while did not differ from those obtained in the 2 patients with proven IM, 100% (4 out of 4) (p = 0.10, 0.10 and 0.27, respectively) (S3 Table).
In the 4 possible IFD patients, the occurrence of Mucorales-specific T cells preceded the detection of the pulmonary lesions in 2 out of 4 patients, namely patients n° 17 and 19; was contemporary in patient 18 and was demonstrated 4 days later in patient 16 (Table 2).
Of note, none of the patients with proven/probable IA, fusariosis and candidiasis showed the occurrence of Mucorales-specific T cells. Accordingly, neither the two patients with proven IM nor the 4 possible IFD patients, with Mucorales-specific T cells, demonstrated the occurrence of Aspergillus-specific T cells in all the tested samples.
4 (25%) out of the 16 possible IFD patients without Mucorales-specific T cells demonstrated the occurrence of Aspergillus-specific T cells in one or more samples, but only three showed such cells directed to more than one antigen or polarized in the production of type-2 cytokine, suggesting that such patients could be upgraded to a higher degree of suspicion for IA. The remaining subject demonstrated Aspergillus-specific immune responses similar to those reported in healthy donors [19, 24] (S4 Table).
A portion of the samples was not informative for all the cytokines studied: 19% (38/201) at T1, 5.5% (11/199) at T2, and 5% (10/198) at T3.
Discussion
We have previously demonstrated the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells in three patients with documented IM [20]. Herein, we describe for the first time–in a prospective study–the frequency of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4 in a large cohort of hematologic patients at high risk for IFD. Mucorales-specific T cells could be demonstrated in 10.3% of 204 patients. Based on their characteristics, patients with positive results could be divided in two groups: group 1 (n = 15), unlikely to have IFD, and group 2 (n = 6), having proven IM or possible IFD, according to revised EORTC/MSG criteria [23].
In group 1, Mucorales-specific immune responses were polarized in a protective manner versus fungi of the order Mucorales, with a median number of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ that was significantly higher than the number of specific T cells producing either IL-10 or IL-4 (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the setting of IA, healthy subjects display higher frequencies of specific T cells producing IFN-γ to Aspergillus antigens when compared to IA patients [19, 24–26].
Patients unlikely to have IFD and the 2 patients with proven IM were significantly different in: 1) their magnitude of specific immune responses, with the strongest responses in group 2 (p < 0.001) and 2) their frequencies of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10 and IL-4, which were significantly higher in group 2 (p = < 0.03 and < 0.01, respectively). These findings suggest that group 2 patients had a stronger stimulation of the specific immune responses and such responses were shaped in a non-protective manner versus fungi of the order Mucorales. Both features are usually associated with high antigen loads [26, 27].
These data are consistent with previous reports: IM patients, as well as IA patients, have specific immune responses predominantly polarized to the production of IL-10 and/or IL-4 at the onset of the infection [19, 20, 22]. The increase of protective T cells occurs later and is associated with a favorable outcome [19].
Of note, the predominant type 2 cytokine secretion profile of Mucorales-specific T cells in the four patients with possible IFD in group 2, is similar to that of the two patients with proven IM in this study and to that of the three patients with proven IM previously reported [20], while significantly differed from the 15 positive patients without IFD.
These findings are important because most cases of IM are diagnosed as possible IFD, mainly due to the absence of sensitive and specific microbiological diagnostic tools and to the fact that tissue diagnosis, the gold standard, is only rarely performed in high risk patients, due to their several comorbidities [4, 11–13].
Of note, only three of the 16 remaining possible patients, without Mucorales-specific T cells, showed Aspergillus-specific T cells suggesting an increase likelihood of IA. This is not surprising as the whole cohort of patients have been extensively screened with the current cultural and non-cultural diagnostic methods (NCBDM) for the diagnosis of IA. Thus, it would have been very unlikely to upgrade a higher number of possible IFD patients to a higher degree of IA suspicion. Indeed, even if we hypothesize that the three possible IFD patients with Aspergillus-specific T cells are true IA cases, it should be acknowledged that such a common work-out correctly classified as IA 33 out of 36 (92%), with rates of infection matching those of the most recent epidemiological studies [8, 28, 29]. On the other hand, only 2 proven IM cases (0,9%) have been identified. Such rates are sensibly lower than the ones reported for IM in the same epidemiological studies [8, 28, 29]. These findings additionally emphasize the need for NCBDM for IM more than IA.
Our results further support the hypothesis that a type 2 cytokine profile is the immunological signature of IM. The concomitant absence of clinical signs of IFD in patients in the first group, characterized by a predominant type 1 cytokine profile, supports such a suggestion.
Some limitations of this study should be discussed. First, the samples taken at T1, usually a period of low leukocyte/lymphocyte counts, demonstrated the absence of vital T cells in approximately 20% of cases, thus showing not informative results. This finding may diminish the usefulness of the assay at least in the first part of post-treatment aplastic phase. However, this drawback can be overcome by repeating the analysis or by analyzing fresh blood samples without thawing, which is a procedure that further reduces the number of viable cells (unpublished data). Secondly, the study was not designed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of detecting Mucorales-specific T cells for the diagnosis of IM. It should be recognized that designing such a rigorous study may represent a problem, considering the tissue-based diagnosis difficulties previously mentioned [11]. However, if we use the ELISpot assay to upgrade at a higher level of IM suspicion the 4 cases of possible IFD, the assay show positivity rates, which seem to match the incidence of IM reported in several cohort of hematologic patients [29–31]. On the other hand, given the high rates of negative patients, our assay could be of help at least to reduce the number of patients at high risk for IM undergoing high dose antifungal treatment based only on clinical clues.
In conclusion, Mucorales-specific T cells may be routinely monitored in hematologic patients during chemotherapy/immunosuppressive regimens and alloSCT. The identification of high numbers of T cells producing IL-10 and/or IL-4 is associated with the diagnosis of proven IM. The detection of Mucorales-specific T cells should be explored as a NCBDM for the diagnosis of IM.
Materials and Methods
Patients
From October 2011 to January 2014, 4 tertiary care centers prospectively enrolled patients with acute myeloid or lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy, patients with other hematologic malignancies requiring either high dose chemotherapy or treatment with antithymocyte globulin, and patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) into the study.
The study has been approved by the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Comitato Etico Provinciale di Modena (CE–protocol number 2414-63/11). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, or from the next of kin, caretaker, or guardian on behalf of the minors enrolled in the study, according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
A sample of 30 mL of PB was drawn from patients at three pre-defined time-periods during their routine clinical examinations: T1 from day 15 to 30, T2 from day 30 to day 45, T3 from day 45 to 60, being T0 the start of chemotherapy or transplant procedure.
All the patients underwent a protocol-defined diagnostic work-up to define, when possible, the site and the etiology of the infectious/inflammatory process. The diagnostic work-up included cultures of blood, urine and feces specimens, molecular and serologic assays for diagnosing the most common viral pathogens, pulmonary and/or abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and, whenever feasible, biopsy of the affected tissue. BAL fluid was cultured for bacterial and fungal pathogens, mycobacteria, and Legionella, and was studied with immunofluorescent staining for Pneumocystis jiroveci, and with molecular and cultural analysis for viral pathogens. The galactomannan assay (Platelia) was performed twice a week on serum samples of acute leukemia patients and alloSCT recipients, and, at discretion of the attending physician, in all the other patients. When available, it was also tested in BAL. An index ≥0.5 and ≥1.0 were considered positive, for serum and BAL respectively. Patients were also surveyed for the development of sinonasal and cerebral infections. When they developed symptoms suggestive of such infections, brain CT scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained. Whenever possible autopsy was performed and specimens of organs involved by the infectious process were sent for histopathology and culture. Hematoxylin-eosine, periodic acid-Schiff, Grocott or Gomori methenamine silver stains were all used to detect hyphal invasion in tissue samples.
The EORTC-MSG criteria have been used to define IFD cases [23].
ELISpot Assay
Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4 have been investigated through the Enzyme Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay. The assay has been performed by three of the authors (DV, PB and GR), unaware of the clinical conditions of the patients, as previously described [19, 20, 22]. Briefly, PBMCs were co-cultured with specific antigens on 96-well flat bottom plates coated with anti-cytokine antibodies, namely anti-IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4, respectively (Mabtech AB, Nacka Strand, Sweden) [20].
The antigen preparation used was represented by heat-killed germinated conidia after four cycles of sonication at 280 W with a frequency of 24 KhZ, from fungi of the order Mucorales, at a concentration of 200,000 conidia/mL. All test conditions were carried out in duplicate or triplicate when possible. As previously reported, a sample was considered positive when all the following conditions were satisfied: 1) the presence of at least 5 SFCs; 2) the presence of more than 5 SFCs compared with the negative control; 3) the presence of a stimulation index of ≥2 (defined as ratio of SFCs in the sample versus the negative control). A sample was considered not informative when this last condition was not met [19, 20, 22]. Results have been reported as median number of SFCs/106 PBMCs with their 25th and 75th percentiles.
Aspergillus-specific T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4 have been detected as previously reported [19]. The antigens used were the seven Aspergillus recombinant antigens previously reported plus the protein of the family of β-(1,3)-glucan-modifying enzymes, namely SUN1p [19].
Statistical Analysis
Median test was used to compare the median number of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ-, IL-10 and IL-4, respectively, in positive patients, including those without IFD and those with proven IM.
Absolute numbers and percentages of the tests with ≥ 100 SFCs/106 PBMCs were determined and compared between the two groups of patients, by using the Fisher's exact test. In the same groups, the differences in the frequencies of Mucorales-specific T cells producing IFN-γ-, IL-10- and IL-4, respectively, have been evaluated.
To define the cut-off values allowing to discriminate between the "true positive" cases from the “false positive” cases, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated and ROC analysis was performed between the cases with a defined diagnosis, with or without Mucorales-specific T cells. The first positive or negative sample has been considered for the analyses. Fisher's exact test has been used to compare the rate of positive samples, according to the identified cut-offs, between the groups.
P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results were analyzed using STATA software (11.0, College Station, Texas, USA).
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to derive cut-offs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Proportion of patients correctly "diagnosed" by the ELISpot assay when all the three types of Mucorales-specific T cells were considered.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Proportion of patients correctly "diagnosed" by the ELISpot assay when Mucorales-specific T cells producing IL-10 and IL-4 were considered.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108.s003
(DOCX)
S3 Table. ELISpot results for Mucorales-specific T cells in the 21 positive patients.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108.s004
(DOCX)
S4 Table. ELISpot results for Aspergillus-specific T cells in the group of 16 possible IFD cases negative for the presence of Mucorales-specific T cells.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149108.s005
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro [grant number AIRC IG-14797], Milan, Italy (ML); the Associazione Italiana Lotta alle Leucemie, Linfoma e Mieloma (AIL)-Sezione ‘‘Luciano Pavarotti”-Modena-ONLUS (LP and FF); Gilead Fellowship Program 2012–2014 (ML); the Societa`Italiana di Ematologia Sperimentale (SIES, ‘‘Piero Martino” award to LP) and research funds by Gilead Sciences to ML. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: LP ML. Performed the experiments: DV PB G. Riva CQ. Analyzed the data: AG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: G. Rossi AP R. Maffei VF CDG AB JPL. Wrote the paper: LP ML AG. Enrolled patients: FF AC SC JM M. Morselli MC CM EC AM M. Maccaferri AS UM R. Marasca FN RF. Interpreted data: PC LR. Interpreted data and critically revised the manuscript: PLV REL.
References
- 1. Chamilos G, Marom EM, Lewis RE, Lionakis MS, Kontoyiannis DP. Predictors of pulmonary zygomicosis versus invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(1):60–6. pmid:15937764
- 2. Kontoyiannis DP, Lionakis MS, Lewis RE, Chamilos G, Healy M, Perego C, et al. Zygomycosis in a tertiary-care cancer center in the era of Aspergillus-active antifungal therapy: a case-control observational study of 27 recent cases. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(8):1350–60. pmid:15776383
- 3. Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, Knudsen TA, Sarkisova TA, Schaufele RL, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(5):634–53. pmid:16080086
- 4. Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE. Invasive zygomycosis: update on pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, and management. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20(3):581–607. pmid:16984870
- 5. Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly increases mortality among patients with hematologic malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(4):503–9. pmid:18611163
- 6. Cornely OA, Arikan-Akdagli S, Dannaoui E, Groll AH, Lagrou K, Chakrabarti A, et al. ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis 2013. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 3:5–26. pmid:24479848
- 7. Pagano L, Valentini CG, Caira M, Fianchi L. Zygomycosis: Current approaches to management of patients with haematological malignancies. Br J Hematol. 2009;146(6):597–606.
- 8. Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, Alexander BD, Anaissie EJ, Walsh TJ, et al. Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001–2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1091–100. pmid:20218877
- 9. Pappas PG, Alexander BD, Andes DR, Hadley S, Kauffman CA, Freifeld AG, et al. Invasive fungal infections among organ transplants recipients: results from the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1101–11. pmid:20218876
- 10. Sun HY, Singh N. Mucormycosis: its contemporary face and management strategies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(4):301–11. pmid:21453871
- 11. Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE, Lortholary O, Spellberg B, Petrikkos G, Roillides E, et al. Future Directions in Mucormycosis Research. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54 Suppl 1:S79–85. pmid:22247450
- 12. Petrikkos G, Skiada A, Lortholary O, Roilides E, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54 Suppl 1:S23–34. pmid:22247442
- 13. Skiada A, Lanternier F, Groll AH, Pagano L, Zimmerli S, Herbrecht R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis in patients with haematological malignancies: guidelines from the 3rd European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL 3). Haematologica. 2013;98(4):492–504. pmid:22983580
- 14. Pagano L, Cornely OA, Busca A, Caira M, Cesaro S, Gasbarrino C, et al. Combined antifungal approach for the treatment of invasive mucormycosis in patients with hematologic diseases: a report from the SEIFEM and FUNGISCOPE registries. Haematologica. 2013;98(10):e127–e30. pmid:23716556
- 15. Walsh TJ, Gamaletsou MN, McGinnis MR, Hayden RT, Kontoyiannis DP. Early clinical and laboratory diagnosis of invasive pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and disseminated mucormycosis (zygomycosis). Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54 Suppl 1:S55–60. pmid:22247446
- 16. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS. Recent advances in the treatment of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;48(12):1743–51.
- 17. Lass-Flörl C, Resch G, Nachbaur D, Mayr A, Gastl G, Auberger J, et al. The value of computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy for diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(7):e101–4. pmid:17806041
- 18. Bacher P, Steinbach A, Kniemeyer O, Hamprecht A, Assenmacher M, Vehreschild MJGT, et al. Fungus-Specific CD4+ Cells for Rapid Identification of Invasive Pulmonary Mold Infection. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2015;191(3):348–52. pmid:25635493
- 19. Potenza L, Vallerini D, Barozzi P, Riva G, Forghieri F, Beauvais A, et al. Characterization of specific immune responses to different Aspergillus antigens during the course of invasive Aspergillosis in hematologic patients. PloS one. 2013;8(9):e74326. pmid:24023936
- 20. Potenza L, Vallerini D, Barozzi P, Riva G, Forghieri F, Zanetti E, et al. Mucorales-specific T cells emerge in the course of invasive mucormycosis and may be used as a surrogate diagnostic marker in high-risk patients. Blood. 2011;118(20):5416–9. pmid:21931119
- 21. Potenza L, Barozzi P, Rossi G, Palazzi G, Vallerini D, Riva G, et al. Assessment of Aspergillus-specific T cells for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in a leukemic child with liver lesions mimicking hepatosplenic candidiasis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15(10):1625–8. pmid:18667632
- 22. Potenza L, Barozzi P, Vallerini D, Bosco R, Quadrelli C, Mediani L, et al. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by tracking Aspergillus-specific T cells in hematologic patients with pulmonary infiltrates. Leukemia. 2007;21(10):578–81.
- 23. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21. pmid:18462102
- 24. Bozza S, Clavaud C, Giovannini G, Fontaine T, Beauvais A, Sarfati J, et al. Immune sensing of Aspergillus fumigatus proteins, glycolipids, and polysaccharides and the impact on Th immunity and vaccination. J Immunol. 2009;183(4):2407–14. pmid:19625642
- 25. Hebart H, Bollinger C, Fisch P, Sarfati J, Meisner C, Baur M, et al. Analysis of T-cell responses to Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in healthy individuals and patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2002;100(13):4521–8. pmid:12393638
- 26. Romani L. Immunity to fungal infections. Nature Rev Immunol. 2011;11(4):275–88.
- 27. Pantaleo G, Harari A. Functional signatures in antiviral T-cell immunity for monitoring virus-associated diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(5):417–23. pmid:16622477
- 28. Chamilos G, Luna M, Lewis RE, Bodey GP, Chemaly R, Tarrand JJ, et al. Invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies in a tertiary care cancer center: an autopsy study over a 15-year period (1989–2003). Haematologica. 2006;91(7):986–9. pmid:16757415
- 29. Lewis RE, Cahyame-Zuniga L, Leventakos K, Chamilos G, Ben-Ami R, Tamboli P, et al. Epidemiology and sites of involvement of invasive fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies: a 20-year autopsy study. Mycoses. 2013;56(6):638–45. pmid:23551865
- 30. Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Epidemiology and treatment of mucormycosis. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(9):1163–75. pmid:24020743
- 31. Bitar D, Van Cauteren D, Lanternier F, Dannaoui E, Che D, Dromer F, et al. Increasing incidence of zygomycosis (mucormycosis), France, 1997–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(9):1395–401. pmid:19788806