Evidence for the Cost of Reproduction in Humans: High Lifetime Reproductive Effort Is Associated with Greater Oxidative Stress in Post-Menopausal Women

Anna Ziomkiewicz; Amelia Sancilio; Andrzej Galbarczyk; Magdalena Klimek; Grazyna Jasienska; Richard G. Bribiescas

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145753

Abstract

Life history theory predicts trade-offs between reproductive effort and maternal survivorship in energy-restricted environments. However, empirical evidence for the positive association between maternal mortality and reproductive effort from energetically challenged human populations are mixed and physiological mechanisms that may underlie this association are poorly understood. We hypothesized that increases in aerobic metabolism during repeated periods of pregnancy and lactation result in increased oxidative stress that may contribute to somatic deterioration, vulnerability to illness, and accelerated aging. We therefore predicted that lifetime gravidity and parity would be related to levels of biomarkers of oxidative stress, as well as antioxidative defence enzymes in post-menopausal women. Our hypothesis was supported by positive linear associations between levels of 8-OHdG, a biomarker of DNA oxidative damage (β = 0.21, p<0.05), levels of antioxidative defence enzyme Cu-Zn SOD (β = 0.25, p<0.05), and number of lifetime pregnancies. Furthermore, independent of age and health status, post-menopausal women with higher gravidity and parity (> = 4 pregnancies per lifetime) had 20% higher levels of 8-OHdG and 60% higher levels of Cu-Zn SOD compared to women with lower gravidity and parity (<4 pregnancies per lifetime). Our results present the first evidence for oxidative stress as a possible cost of reproductive effort in humans.

Citation: Ziomkiewicz A, Sancilio A, Galbarczyk A, Klimek M, Jasienska G, Bribiescas RG (2016) Evidence for the Cost of Reproduction in Humans: High Lifetime Reproductive Effort Is Associated with Greater Oxidative Stress in Post-Menopausal Women. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753

Editor: Cristoforo Scavone, Universidade de São Paulo, BRAZIL

Received: July 31, 2015; Accepted: December 7, 2015; Published: January 13, 2016

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication

Data Availability: Data file available from the Dryad database http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v4055

Funding: This work was supported by Fulbright Commission (Senior Advanced Research Award to A. Ziomkiewicz): http://www.fulbright.edu.pl/en/home/, Polish National Science Centre (Grant no N N404 273440 to G. Jasienska): https://www.ncn.gov.pl/?language=en, Polish Ministry of Sciences and Higher Education (Grant no IdP2011 000161 to G. Jasienska): http://www.nauka.gov.pl/en/, Yale University, and Salus Publica Foundation: https://www.facebook.com/saluspublica. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Humans, like all other organisms, face trade-offs between reproduction and maintenance when energy resources are limited [1]. Due to the metabolic costs of pregnancy and lactation, women bear significant physiological costs associated with reproductive effort and thus are susceptible to the negative consequences of these trade-offs [2]. Oxidative stress (OS), the state of imbalance between generation and management of damaging reactive oxidative species (ROS) and peroxidative agents through aerobic metabolism, is postulated as a central factor contributing to somatic deterioration with age [3]. Moreover, the intensity and effects of OS are influenced by environmental and life history factors. Among those factors, reproductive effort is hypothesized to be a key cost, contributing to increased OS throughout an organism’s lifespan [4]. Although this theoretical prediction has been extensively investigated in animals [5–6], compelling evidence is absent in humans.

Of the many sources of variation in oxidative stress, pregnancy, followed by lactation and childcare, are proposed to be central since they incur major increases in energy metabolism due to the costs of fetal development, milk production, and energy expenditure associated with maternal maintenance and physical activity [7]. This major rise in metabolism and energy flux might be associated with increased production of ROS and greater risk of oxidative stress [8].

The Disposable Soma Theory [9] predicts that in energetically constrained environments, organisms will benefit by investing limited resources in reproduction rather than in maintenance and repair. Over a lifetime, this leads to the accumulation of the cellular damage that impairs normal functioning of cells and tissues and contributes to faster somatic deterioration and aging [10]. Therefore, it can be expected that increases in energy metabolism related to high reproductive effort will contribute to maternal aging and lifespan reduction via accumulation of oxidative stress, especially in energetically constrained environments.

Up to date evidence in favor of these predictions in humans are mixed [11]. Studies of historical populations have been inconsistent, showing positive, negative, or no relationship between total parity and post-menopausal survival [12]. This inconsistency might be explained by several factors impossible to control for from archives data such as breastfeeding (constitutes the highest cost of single reproductive episode) or overall energy budget of woman [1,11]. Studies of contemporary populations have demonstrated a U-shaped relationship, with nulliparity and multipartiy (above 4 children) associated with highest mortality [12].

Significant increases in oxidative stress during gestation are evident, but only a few studies have investigated oxidative stress during the menstrual cycle [13–14], and virtually no studies have explored maternal oxidative stress during lactation [15]. Furthermore, the relationship between lifetime reproductive effort and accumulated oxidative stress in women has not been investigated.

To fill this gap, we conducted a study at the Mogielica Human Ecology Study Site [2], which includes 5 villages in the mountainous area of Southern Poland. During their reproductive period, women of this area have a broad range of parity (from 0 to 16 children) and intense physical activity associated with seasonally demanding agricultural work. Due to the mountainous terrain, operating heavy machinery is difficult and much of the work is done by hand. Previous studies by Jasienska and Ellison [16–17] documented very heavy physical activity levels during the summer season and light-moderate physical activity level during the winter season (according to the FAO/WHO/UNU1985 definition) [18] for women of reproductive age from this area. High reproductive effort accompanied by high energy flux during the reproductive period may intensify trade-offs incurred by reproductive processes later in post- reproductive life [1]. Indeed, previous studies conducted in this population demonstrated a reduction in maternal longevity in association with number of children [19].

Based on the recent observation of increased levels of biomarkers of oxidative stress in multiparous women suggesting that acute oxidative stress effects may accumulate over the consecutive reproductive episodes [20] we hypothesized that increased lifetime reproductive effort is associated with higher oxidative stress in postmenopausal women. To test this hypothesis in 100 postmenopausal, non-smoking women (median age 65 years) we measured urinary levels of three biomarkers: 8-Oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu-Zn SOD), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) that together provide a composite assessment of whole body oxidative stress. These three biomarkers are widely and commonly deployed to assess oxidative stress in human studies [21–23]. In particular, levels of 8-OHdG depict the amount of oxidative damage accumulated in cellular DNA through the repaired lesions formed by ROS on the guanine base pair. Cu-Zn SOD represents the level of superoxide dismutase enzyme produced in cytoplasm, which contributes to the neutralization of ROS and serves as a main line of defense against ongoing oxidative stress. TBARS assessment reflects cellular lipid peroxidation as a result of oxidative stress.

Methods

Subjects

One hundred and twelve postmenopausal women were recruited from the general population of the villages during door-to-door visits to women’s houses. Postmenopausal women from all households in villages were invited to participate. Out of this number 12 women were excluded due to past and current smoking, which has been demonstrated to significantly impact oxidative stress biomarkers [24].

All women were examined by a physician on the day of sample collection to diagnose and exclude from participation any cases of ongoing bacterial or viral infection. Due to advanced age, over 70% of the postmenopausal women in the sample had long-term health problems resulting in past hospitalization or long-term use of medication. Vitamin supplementation was declared by about 30% of women. All women signed written consent for participation in the study. Study protocol was reviewed and approved by Bioethical Committee of the Jagiellonian University.

General questionnaire and reproductive history

A general questionnaire was designed to collect information about participant’s age, level of education, marital status, current and previous employment and workload, long-term health problems, current and past use of medication, occurrence of diseases and medical conditions, lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, and reproductive history. Based on this information, the following reproductive effort variables were calculated: lifetime reproductive period (years between giving birth to the first and to the last child) and lifetime number of months spent pregnant and lactating. In addition, total energetic costs of reproduction were estimated based on data about pregnancy and lactation energetic requirements published by Butte and King [7]. Pregnancies that resulted in miscarriage were also included in these estimates, with the energy cost of the early-terminated pregnancy calculated for the first half of the normal pregnancy.

Anthropometrics

Trained study assistants collected anthropometrical measurements of body height, sitting height, body mass, total and abdominal body fat, and body circumferences. These measurements were conducted during the initial visit to participants’ houses.

Body mass, body fat percentage, and abdominal fat rating were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a TANITA scale (model BC 545) with the accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg (for body mass) and 0.1% (for body fat). Body height and sitting height were measured with a stadiometer, according to the standard methods, with the accuracy to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Blood sample analysis

Trained nurses in the local outpatient clinic collected fasting blood sample from each participant. Samples were analyzed for basic blood parameters such as: hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (Hgb), red blood cells (RBC), platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cells (WBC), glucose concentration, (GLU) low and high density lipoprotein concentration (LDL and HDL) and CRP to assess general health status of participating women. All analyses were performed in the laboratory of local, nearby hospital in Limanowa. Evaluation of HCT, Hgb, RBC, MCV, WBC and platelet count was performed by an automated hematology analyzer (SYSMEX k-4500). ESR was determined automatically by Westergren method using SEDI 15. GLU, HDL, LDL and CRP concentrations were tested automatically using Pentra 400 analyzer by Horiba ABX.

Urine samples analysis

Women collected a single first morning urine sample in sterile specimen containers provided by study assistants and delivered samples to the local outpatient clinic. All samples were collected during summer months (July and August) of 2013. Samples were aliquoted to separate vials and frozen within one hour of collection at -80C. Frozen samples were transported on dry ice to the Reproductive Ecology Laboratory in the Department of Anthropology at Yale University in order to conduct assay assessments of oxidative stress biomarkers. Samples were thawed and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 G immediately before starting the assays to eliminate particulate matter that could interfere with the analyses. All assays were conducted using commercial ELISA kits in accordance to manufacturer directions and procedures. DNA damage EIA kit (Enzo Life Sciences, catalogue nr ADI-EKS-350) was used to measure levels of 8-OHdG. 8-hydroxy-2’- deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a modified nucleotide base and by-product of DNA damage that is excreted in the urine upon DNA repair. The sensitivity of the DNA Damage assay has been determined to be 0.59 ng/mL. The human Cu-Zn SOD enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Enzo Life Sciences, catalog nr ALX-850-033) was used to analyse level of Cu-Zn superoxidase dismutase. This enzyme, which is present in the cytoplasm, catalyses the dismutation of superoxide anion radicals to free oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. The assay sensitivity according to manufacturer protocol is 0.04 ng/ml. Levels of Thiobaturic Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) were analyzed using TBARS Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical Company, catalogue nr 10009055) to determine cellular lipid peroxidation occurring as a consequence of oxidative stress.

All analyses were run in duplicates. Samples were randomly assigned to each assay. The average inter-assay variability for 8-OHdG, SOD, and TBARS analysis was 14% while intra-assay variability was 5%. All obtained results were corrected for urine concentration based on samples’ specific gravity.

Statistical analysis

Values of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense biomarkers were log- transformed to insure a normal distribution. Gravidity was used as a composite measure of reproductive effort, which includes number of pregnancies, birth, and miscarriages and is highly correlated with time spent on lactation (see Results). Student’s t-test for independent sample was used to test the differences in health status, selected demographic and reproductive history variables between lower (<4 pregnancies) and higher (> = 4 pregnancies) gravidity group. Women’s assignment to these two groups was established based on results of several previous studies demonstrating increased costs of reproduction to mortality in women who gave birth to at least 4 children [12, 25–27].

General linear models (GLM) were used to test for the effect of gravidity on the level of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense biomarkers. Differences in biomarkers of oxidative stress between higher and lower gravidity groups were tested using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and Covariance (MANCOVA). In these models log-transformed levels of 8-OHdG, Cu-Zn SOD and TBARS were entered together as the dependent variables because they all measure underlying concept of oxidative stress. Gravidity groups were used as the categorical independent variables. Age and abdominal fat were entered as the covariants, because both of these measures were previously shown to influence oxidative stress biomarkers [28]. Furthermore, selected blood parameters were entered to the models to account for participants’ health status. In particular, high glucose level and high ESR associated with increased and high HDL associated with decreased oxidative stress [28–30] were added to the models.

To test for linear association between gravidity and levels of oxidative stress biomarkers, linear regression models were used, with levels of the oxidative stress biomarkers entered as the dependent variables and gravidity entered as the independent predictors. Potential confounders (age, abdominal fat, GLU and LDL concentration, and ESR after 2 hours) were introduced as candidate covariates using backward step-wise regression methods with entrance and removal criteria of a p value of less than 0.05 and F value equal to 3.

In addition, as U-shaped association between postmenopausal mortality and parity was demonstrated in previous studies [11–12] we tested for the same shape of the association between oxidative stress biomarkers and gravidity using polynomial regression models.

All analyses were conducted using STATISTICA version 10 with p-values set on 0.05.

Results

Descriptive statistics and simple correlations

Average levels of oxidative stress biomarkers in the sample of postmenopausal women were 109.0 ng/ml (SD = 44.45) for 8-OHdG, 0.56 ng/ml (SD = 0.437) for Cu-Zn SOD, and 2.1 μM/g (SD = 1.75) for TBARS. As indicated by BMI (31.2; SD = 5.41) and percent of abdominal body fat (10.8; SD = 2.96), women participating in the study had good nutritional status. Although all of them were previously involved in occupational physical work, most of them did not work anymore, neither at their farms or houses nor outside of them. Thus the level of their current physical activity was relatively low. All descriptive statistics for women participating in the study are presented in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Blood parameters, anthropometric, demographic and reproductive characteristics of the study group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753.t001

Significant and positive correlations were found between levels of all oxidative stress biomarkers (r = 0.59, p<0.01 for ln 8-OHdG and ln Cu-Zn SOD; r = 0.31, p<0.01 for ln 8-OHdG and ln TBARS; and r = 0.33, p<0.01 for ln Cu-Zn SOD and ln TBARS).

No significant differences in oxidative stress biomarkers were found between women who did and did not report long-term health problems (hospitalization, long-term use of medication) (t = -1.91, p>0.05 for ln 8-OHdG; t = -0.73, p>0.1 for ln Cu-ZnSOD; t = 0.79, p>0.1 for ln TBARS). No significant differences were also found between women who did and did not supplement vitamins (t = -1.35, p>0.1 for ln 8-OHdG; t = -1.63, p>0.1 for ln Cu-Zn SOD; t = -0.31, p>0.7 for ln TBARS).

In contrast, significant associations were found between levels of oxidative stress biomarkers and health status parameters measured in blood. In particular, levels of TBARS were negatively associated with HDL (r = -0.25, p<0.05) and positively associated with GLU level (r = 0.27, p<0.01), while levels of 8-OHdG were negatively associated with ESR measured after 2 hours (r = -0.20, p<0.05).

Significant and robust positive correlations were found between gravidity and all investigated parameters of reproductive effort, namely between parity (r = 0.94, p<0.001), number of sons (r = 0.67, p<0.001), number of daughters (r = 0.65, p<0.001), lifetime lactation period (r = 0.57, p<0.001), lifetime reproductive period (r = 0.56, p<0.001) and number of miscarriages (r = 0.35, p<0.01). Furthermore, gravidity correlated negatively with age at first birth (r = -0.24, p<0.02) and positively with age at last birth (r = 0.40, p<0.001). Based on the above results, gravidity was chosen as a composite measure of reproductive effort.

Oxidative stress in women with low and high reproductive effort

As expected, women with at least four pregnancies during a lifetime (higher gravidity) spent twice as long being pregnant and triple the amount of time lactating (t = -14.17, p<0.001 for number of months pregnant; t = -6.53, p<0.001 for number of months lactating). Consequently, they spent almost two times more energy on reproduction than women with lower gravidity, as indicated by estimated energetic cost of their pregnancies and lactations (t = -5.82, p<0.001). Differences in anthropometric, demographic, reproductive characteristics and health status parameters between women from lower vs higher gravidity group are presented in Table 1.

The multivariate results of MANOVA showed significant effect of low and high gravidity on the levels of oxidative stress biomarkers (Pillai’s Trace = 0.09, F = 3.28, p<0.05), indicating that consistent with our prediction, postmenopausal women with higher gravidity had higher levels of oxidative stress biomarkers than women with lower gravidity. In particular, the univariate F tests results showed significant difference between lower and higher gravidity group for log-transformed levels of 8-OHdG (F = 5.14, p = 0.025) and Cu-Zn SOD (F = 9.28, p = 0.003). No difference between those two groups was found for log-transformed TBARS levels (F = 2.24, p = 0.138) (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Levels of 8-OHdG, Cu-Zn SOD and TBARS in postmenopausal women from lower and higher gravidity group.

Levels of 8-OHdG presented on left Y-axis, levels of Cu-Zn SOD and TBARS presented on right Y- axis. Significant differences between groups asterisked.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753.g001

The observed differences in oxidative stress biomarkers remained significant when factors such as age and health status parameters (abdominal fat, ESR after 2 hours, GLU and HDL levels) were introduced to MANCOVA models (Pillai’s Trace = 0.09, F = 2.89, p<0.05). Consistently, higher gravidity was associated with significantly higher levels of log-transformed 8-OHdG (F = 5.38, p<0.05), and Cu-Zn SOD (F = 8.23, p<0.01). No significant difference between high and low gravidity group was found for TBARS levels (F = 0.82, p>0.3). Detailed results of MANCOVA model are presented in Table 2.

Download:

Table 2. Univariate results of MANCOVA models of the association between biomarkers of oxidative stress and reproductive effort adjusted for age and health status parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753.t002

Association between biomarkers of oxidative stress and reproductive effort

Simple regression models confirmed predicted positive association between biomarkers of oxidative stress and gravidity for log-transformed values of 8-OHdG (β = 0.19, p = 0.05), Cu-Zn SOD (β = 0.27, p<0.01) and TBARS (β = 0.21, p<0.05). Furthermore, results of backward stepwise multiple linear regression models with age and health status parameters (abdominal fat, GLU, ESR, HDL) evidenced independent effect of gravidity on the levels of 8-OHdG (R²_adj = 0.06, p<0.02) and Cu-Zn SOD (R²_adj = 0.05, p<0.02). Final model for ln 8-OHdG included abdominal fat (β = -0.26, p<0.02) and number of pregnancies (β = 0.21, p<0.05) and for ln Cu-Zn SOD only number of pregnancies (β = 0.25, p<0.02) (Fig 2). Although results of stepwise regression analysis for TBARS were statistically significant (R²_adj = 0.14, p<0.01) gravidity was removed from the model in the third step (F_remov = 0.97, p>0.3) leaving GLU and HDL as the best predictors of ln TBARS in the model (β = 0.28, p<0.01 for GLU and β = -0.25, p<0.02 for ESR).

Download:

Fig 2. Positive associations between gravidity and levels of oxidative damage and defence biomarkers.

Association between gravidity and 8-OHdG (a) and Cu-Zn SOD (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753.g002

Results of second order polynomial regression analysis showed no evidence for U-shaped association between gravidity and levels of oxidative stress biomarkers. Detailed results of the analysis are presented in Table 3.

Download:

Table 3. Results of second order polynomial regression for biomarkers of oxidative stress and gravidity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145753.t003

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that clearly demonstrates higher oxidative stress in association with elevated lifetime reproductive effort in women. We found that women with higher lifetime gravidity had nearly 20% higher levels of 8-OHdG, a biomarker of oxidative damage to DNA, and 60% higher levels of Cu-Zn SOD, a biomarker of antioxidative defense compared to women with lower gravidity. Moreover, levels of 8-OHdG and Cu-Zn SOD exhibited a linear association with lifetime gravidity suggesting a dose dependent response between reproductive effort and oxidative stress.

Increased level of DNA oxidation in women with higher gravidity reflects an imbalance between ROS production and ROS-mediated damage repair, and indicates elevated oxidative stress in response to increased reproductive effort. Similarly, higher levels of Cu-Zn SOD, the front-line defense enzyme against reactive oxygen species-mediated injury, indicates higher ROS production and should be also interpreted as a biomarker of increased oxidative stress [22]. While these results might also be construed as reflecting acute differences in oxidative stress between high and low gravidity women, the lack of differences in lifestyle variables associated with oxidative stress makes this unlikely. Instead, we offer that the cumulative effects of reproductive effort contribute to greater susceptibility to oxidative stress in post-menopausal women.

In accordance with our results, other studies have shown that levels of oxidative stress biomarkers increase, while antioxidant capacity decreases, during pregnancy and when compared to non-pregnant status [31–33]. Moreover, oxidative damage associated with pregnancy may accumulate with consecutive pregnancies. Oxidative stress index is more than 50% higher and total antioxidant capacity is about 10% lower in cord blood of multiparous women when compared to primiparous women [20].

Elevated oxidative stress observed in women with higher gravidity might be attributed to higher energy metabolism associated with the reproductive process. Indeed, as shown in our sample women with higher gravidity spent over two times more energy on reproduction when compared to women with lower gravidity. On average, daily energy requirements rise by about 20% during woman’s pregnancy and up to 50% during lactation [7]. During pregnancy, this additional energy is utilized to facilitate foetus tissue development and metabolism. In late pregnancy, about 55% of foetal total glucose utilization is used for oxidation [34]. In addition, maternal carbohydrate oxidation increases about 30% when compared to postpartum period [35]. Thus, amplified oxidation during gestation may create an extra burden to maternal oxidative/antioxidative balance and result in increased oxidative stress.

Although convincing evidence does not exist for women, studies in post-partum cows imply gradual increases in oxidative damage and decreases in antioxidant capacity during the early process of lactation. These effects on females’ oxidative/antioxidative profiles tend to intensify during the lactation of consecutive offspring [36–37]. Lactation periods in red squirrels were associated with an almost 50% increase in daily energy expenditure (DEE), resulting in a 2-fold increase in oxidative damage compared to the non- lactating period [38].

During lactation in humans, surplus energy is used for breast milk synthesis but glucose oxidation does not differ between lactating and non-pregnant, non-lactating women [39], which suggests that other sources of fuels are utilized during this period. Indeed, several studies report high lipid mobilization during lactation [40]. In contrast to glucose, which is a primary source of free radical production, lipids metabolism produces significantly less ROS [41]. This difference in fuels utilization may explain why the number of pregnancies but not periods of lactation was associated with oxidative damage and antioxidative defense in postmenopausal women in our study.

High reproductive effort might lead to oxidative stress and accumulation of the oxidative damage, especially when accompanied by elevated physical activity levels that may limit the energy available for repair mechanisms during the reproductive period [9]. Women from our rural population devoted a considerable amount of energy to intensive physical work during their reproductive period as shown by previous studies [16–17]. Seasonal increases in workload led to a reduction in levels of ovarian steroids, which suggests that energy expenditure associated with physical activity constituted a biologically significant constraint on women’s energy budget. On the average, mean energy expenditure for women of reproductive age in this population was 10.7 MJ/day. During August, a month with the most demanding physical work, mean total daily energy expenditure was 2.02 (expressed as a multiple of BMR) [16]. Although acute physical activity may constitute independent and additional source of oxidative damage, [42] it is unlikely that physical activity at present had any significant effect on oxidative stress, as most of the participating women were unable to maintain high physical activity due to their advanced age. Instead, we propose that high physical activity during the reproductive period in addition to high reproductive energy investment might disturb oxidative/antioxidative balance and generate oxidative damage.

Recently published, critical review on oxidative stress as a cost of reproduction by Speakman and Garratt [6] concluded that in order to magnify the allocation trade-off more studies should be conducted in females that are highly challenged during their reproduction by energetically costly environmental burdens and in females that engage in repeated reproductive attempts. Our sample of postmenopausal rural women from Poland fulfills both criteria. We demonstrated the positive association between oxidative stress and reproductive effort, that may evidence the trade-off, in individuals under high environmental pressure associated with seasonal changes in physical workload and diet, engaging in several (up to 10) consecutive reproductive episodes. It is however possible, that the observed variation in oxidative stress may result from completely different source than the trade-off itself. For instance, antagonistic pleiotropic effect of genes may play a role here as evidenced by our recent study on ApoE4 allele [43]. The ApoE4 allele (at the ApoE locus, encoding apolipoprotein E) is associated with significantly increased risk of poor health. We demonstrated that women who carry at least one ApoE4 allele had significantly higher level of progesterone than women without ApoE4 allele. This result indicates that higher fertility in women might be associated with increased risk of poor health and possibly higher oxidative stress via genetic pathway. Moreover, psychosocial stress associated with trauma episodes during life may also influence level of oxidative stress [44]. Thus future studies investigating the association between oxidative stress and reproductive effort should take these factors into account.

The biological significance of the oxidative stress difference between high and low gravidity remains to be determined. However higher levels of oxidative stress biomarkers are associated with greater mortality in older individuals after controlling for smoking, alcohol consumption, and other factors that are commonly linked to decreased lifespan [45]. Moreover, Semba et al. [46] demonstrated that oxidative stress is associated with increased mortality at older ages in women. Although these investigations used different biomarkers e.g. reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROM), total thiol levels (TTL) and protein carbonyls, their results suggest that the differences in oxidative stress biomarkers found in our study might be indicative of greater risk of decreased lifespan due to accelerated aging.

Life history theory predicts trade-offs between reproductive effort and longevity when energy resources are limited [47–48]. Accordingly, lifetime parity was demonstrated to shorten lifespan in some but not all energetically constrained environments [19, 49–52]. Lifetime parity and gravidity has been also observed to be a risk factor to many diseases associated with higher mortality in post reproductive life such as cardiovascular disease, some forms of cancer, insulin resistance, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease [53–56]. Oxidative stress is implicated to play central role in pathophysiology of these diseases [57–58]. Our study links these phenomena by presenting evidence for the oxidative stress as a possible physiological cost of high reproductive effort in humans.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to our study assistants and to women who participated in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AZ GJ RGB. Performed the experiments: AZ AG MK. Analyzed the data: AZ AS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AS RGB MK AG. Wrote the paper: AZ AS AG MK RGB.

References

1. Jasienska G. Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. Am J Hum Biol. 2009; 21: 524–532. () pmid:19367577
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Jasienska G. The Fragile Wisdom: An Evolutionary View on Women’s Biology and Health; Boston: Harvard University Press; 2013.
3. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000; 408: 239–247. () pmid:11089981
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Dowling DK, Simmons LW. Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 1737–1745. () pmid:19324792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Stier A, Reichert S, Massemin S, Bize P, Criscuolo F. Constraint and cost of oxidative stress on reproduction: correlative evidence in laboratory mice and review of the literature. Front Zool. 2012; 9: 37. () pmid:23268929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Speakman JR, Garratt M. Oxidative stress as a cost of reproduction: Beyond the simplistic trade-off model. BioEssays. 2014; 36: 93–106. () pmid:24285005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Butte NF, King JC. Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Public Health Nutr. 2007; 8: 1010–1027. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005; 3: 28. () pmid:16018814
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kirkwood TB, Rose MR. Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991; 332: 15–24. () pmid:1677205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Harman D. Free radical theory of aging. Mutat Res. 1992; 275: 257–266. () pmid:1383768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Gagnon A. Natural fertility and longevity. Fertil Steril. 2015;103: 1109–1116. () pmid:25934597
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Hurt LS, Ronsmans C, Thomas SL. The effect of number of births on women’s mortality: systematic review of the evidence for women who have completed their childbearing. Popul Stud (NY). 2006; 60: 55–71. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Karowicz-Bilinska A, Plodzidym M, Krol J, Lewinska A, Bartosz G. Changes of markers of oxidative stress during menstrual cycle. Redox Rep. 2008; 13: 237–240. () pmid:18796243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Wactawski-Wende J, Schisterman EF, Hovey KM, Howards PP, Browne RW, Hediger M, et al. BioCycle study: design of the longitudinal study of the oxidative stress and hormone variation during the menstrual cycle. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009; 23: 171–184. () pmid:19159403
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Agarwal A, Aponte-Mellado A, Premkumar BJ, Shaman A, Gupta S. The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012; 10: 49. () pmid:22748101
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Physical work causes suppression of ovarian function in women. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998; 265: 1847–1851. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Energetic factors and seasonal changes in ovarian function in women from rural Poland. Am J Hum Biol. 2004; 16: 563–580. () pmid:15368604
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Energy and protein requirements. Tech. Rep. Ser. 724. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1985.
19. Jasienska G, Nenko I, Jasienski M. Daughters increase longevity of fathers, but daughters and sons equally reduce longevity of mothers. Am J Hum Biol. 2006; 18: 422–425. () pmid:16634019
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Mutlu B, Bas AY, Aksoy N, Taskin A. The effect of maternal number of births on oxidative and antioxidative systems in cord blood. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25: 802–805. () pmid:21824039
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Valavanidis A,Vlachogianni T, Fiotakis C. 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG): A Critical Biomarker of Oxidative Stress and Carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009; 27: 120–139. () pmid:19412858
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Pawlak K, Pawlak D, Mysliwiec M. Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase plasma levels as a new useful clinical biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin Biochem. 2005; 38: 700–705. () pmid:15963971
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Del Rio D, Stewart AJ, Pellegrini N. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2005; 15: 316–328. () pmid:16054557
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Seet RC, Lee CYJ, Loke WM, Huang SH, Huang H, Looi WF, et al. Biomarkers of oxidative damage in cigarette smokers: which biomarkers might reflect acute versus chronic oxidative stress? Free Radic Biol Med. 2011; 50: 1787–1793. () pmid:21420490
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Dribe M. Long-term effects of childbearing on mortality: evidence from pre-industrial Sweden. Popul Stud (NY). 2004; 58: 297–310. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Dekker JM, Schouten EG. Number of pregnancies and risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1894–1895. () pmid:8267782
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J, Flegal KM, Kelsey JL, Balanger A, et al. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1528–1533. () pmid:8267704
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Keaney JF, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Wilson PWF, Lipinska I, Corey D, et al. Obesity and systemic oxidative stress: clinical correlates of oxidative stress in the Framingham Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23: 434–439. () pmid:12615693
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Kontush A, Chantepie S, Chapman MJ. Small, dense HDL particles exert potent protection of atherogenic LDL against oxidative stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23: 1881–1888. () pmid:12920049
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Sarban S, Kocyigit A, Yazar M, Isikan UE. Plasma total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation, and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin Biochem. 2005;38: 981–986. () pmid:16150434
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Idonije OB, Festus O, Okhiai O, Akpamu U. A Comparative Study of the Status of Oxidative Stress in Pregnant Nigerian Women. Res J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 4: 28–36. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Idogun E, Odiegwu M, Momoh S, Okonofua F. Effect of pregnancy on total antioxidant capacity in Nigerian women. Pak J Med Sci. Q. 2008; 24: 2–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Hung TH, Lo LM, Chiu TH, Li MJ, Yeh YL, Chen SF. A longitudinal study of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in women with uncomplicated pregnancies throughout gestation. Reprod Sci. 2010; 17: 401–409. () pmid:20167745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Brown L, Regnault T, Rozance P, Barry J, Hay WW Jr. Pregnancy and feto-placental growth: macronutrients. In: Symonds ME, Ramsay MM, editors. Maternal-fetal nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
35. Butte NF. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in pregnancy: normal compared with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 71: 1256s–1261s. pmid:10799399
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Albera E, Kankofer M. The comparison of antioxidative/oxidative profile in colostrum, milk and blood of early post-partum cows during their first and second lactation. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010; 45: e417–425. () pmid:20210886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Albera E, Kankofer M. The comparison of antioxidative/oxidative profile in blood, colostrum and milk of early post-partum cows and their newborns. Reprod Domest Anim. 2011; 46: 763–769. () pmid:21198972
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Fletcher QE, Selman C, Boutin S, McAdam AG, Woods SB, Seo AY, et al. Oxidative damage increases with reproductive energy expenditure and is reduced by food-supplementation. Evolution. 2013; 67: 1527–1536. () pmid:23617928
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Tigas S, Sunehag A, Haymond MW. Metabolic adaptation to feeding and fasting during lactation in humans. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2002; 87: 302–307. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Stuebe A, Rich-Edwards J. The reset hypothesis: lactation and maternal metabolism. Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26: 81–88. () pmid:19031350
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Mobbs CV, Mastaitis JW, Zhang M, Isoda F, Cheng H, Yen K. Secrets of the lac operon. Glucose hysteresis as a mechanism in dietary restriction, aging and disease. In: Mobs CV, Yen K, Hof PR, editors. Mechanisms of Dietary Restriction in Aging and Disease. Interdiscip Top Gerontol. 2007; 35: 39–68. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Fisher G, Schwartz DD, Quindry J, Barberio MD, Foster EB, Jones KW, et al. Lymphocyte enzymatic antioxidant responses to oxidative stress following high-intensity interval exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2011; 110: 730–737. () pmid:21127208
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Jasienska G, Ellison PT, Galbarczyk A, Jasienski M, Kalemba-Drozdz M, Kapiszewska M, et al. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism is related to differences in potential fertility in women: a case of antagonistic pleiotropy? Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282: 20142395. () pmid:25673673
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Miller MW, Sadeh N. Traumatic stress, oxidative stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: neurodegeneration and the accelerated-aging hypothesis. Mol Psychiatry. Macmillan Publishers Limited; 2014;19: 1156–1162. () pmid:25245500
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Schöttker B, Saum KU, Jansen EH, Boffetta P, Trichopoulou A, Holleczek B, et al. Oxidative stress markers and all-cause mortality at older age: a population-based cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70: 518–524. pmid:25070660
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Semba RD, Ferrucci L, Sun K, Walston J, Varadhan R, Guralnik JM, et al. Oxidative stress is associated with greater mortality in older women living in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55: 1421–1425. () pmid:17767685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Stearns SC. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quart Rev Biol. 1976; 51: 3–47. () pmid:778893
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Stearns SC. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol. 1989; 3: 259–268. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Lycett JE, Dunbar RIM, Voland E. Longevity and the costs of reproduction in a historical human population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000; 267: 31–35. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Doblhammer G, Oeppen J. Reproduction and longevity among the British peerage: the effect of frailty and health selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 270: 1541–1547. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Hurt LS, Ronsmans C, Quigley M. Does the number of sons born affect long-term mortality of parents? A cohort study in rural Bangladesh. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 273: 149–155. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Hank K. Childbearing history, later-life health, and mortality in Germany. Popul Stud. 2010; 64: 275–291. ()
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Atsma F, Bartelink MLE, Grobbee DE, Rutten A, Bots ML, Prokop M, van der Schouw YT. Reproductive factors, metabolic factors, and coronary artery calcification in older women. Menopause. 2008; 15: 899–904. () pmid:18779678
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Beeri MS, et al. Number of children is associated with neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease in women. Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 30: 1184–1191. () pmid:18079025
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Naver K, Lundbye-Christensen S, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Nilas L, Secher NJ, Rasmussen S, Ovesen P. Parity and risk of diabetes in a Danish nationwide birth cohort. Diabet Med. 2011; 28: 43–47. () pmid:21166844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Guan H-B, Wu Q-J, Gong T-T. Parity and kidney cancer risk: evidence from epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22: 2345–2353. () pmid:24108791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Ceriello A, Motz E. Is oxidative stress the pathogenic mechanism underlying insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease? The common soil hypothesis revisited. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 816–823. () pmid:14976002
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Bonda DJ, Wang X, Perry G, Nunomura A, Tabaton M, Zhu X, Smith MA. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease: a possibility for prevention. Neuropharmacology. 2010; 59: 290–294. () pmid:20394761
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Jasienska G. Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. Am J Hum Biol. 2009; 21: 524–532. () pmid:19367577
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Jasienska G. The Fragile Wisdom: An Evolutionary View on Women’s Biology and Health; Boston: Harvard University Press; 2013.

[ref3] 3. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000; 408: 239–247. () pmid:11089981
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Dowling DK, Simmons LW. Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 1737–1745. () pmid:19324792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Stier A, Reichert S, Massemin S, Bize P, Criscuolo F. Constraint and cost of oxidative stress on reproduction: correlative evidence in laboratory mice and review of the literature. Front Zool. 2012; 9: 37. () pmid:23268929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Speakman JR, Garratt M. Oxidative stress as a cost of reproduction: Beyond the simplistic trade-off model. BioEssays. 2014; 36: 93–106. () pmid:24285005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Butte NF, King JC. Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Public Health Nutr. 2007; 8: 1010–1027. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005; 3: 28. () pmid:16018814
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kirkwood TB, Rose MR. Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991; 332: 15–24. () pmid:1677205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Harman D. Free radical theory of aging. Mutat Res. 1992; 275: 257–266. () pmid:1383768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Gagnon A. Natural fertility and longevity. Fertil Steril. 2015;103: 1109–1116. () pmid:25934597
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hurt LS, Ronsmans C, Thomas SL. The effect of number of births on women’s mortality: systematic review of the evidence for women who have completed their childbearing. Popul Stud (NY). 2006; 60: 55–71. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Karowicz-Bilinska A, Plodzidym M, Krol J, Lewinska A, Bartosz G. Changes of markers of oxidative stress during menstrual cycle. Redox Rep. 2008; 13: 237–240. () pmid:18796243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wactawski-Wende J, Schisterman EF, Hovey KM, Howards PP, Browne RW, Hediger M, et al. BioCycle study: design of the longitudinal study of the oxidative stress and hormone variation during the menstrual cycle. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009; 23: 171–184. () pmid:19159403
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Agarwal A, Aponte-Mellado A, Premkumar BJ, Shaman A, Gupta S. The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012; 10: 49. () pmid:22748101
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Physical work causes suppression of ovarian function in women. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998; 265: 1847–1851. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Energetic factors and seasonal changes in ovarian function in women from rural Poland. Am J Hum Biol. 2004; 16: 563–580. () pmid:15368604
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Energy and protein requirements. Tech. Rep. Ser. 724. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1985.

[ref19] 19. Jasienska G, Nenko I, Jasienski M. Daughters increase longevity of fathers, but daughters and sons equally reduce longevity of mothers. Am J Hum Biol. 2006; 18: 422–425. () pmid:16634019
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Mutlu B, Bas AY, Aksoy N, Taskin A. The effect of maternal number of births on oxidative and antioxidative systems in cord blood. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25: 802–805. () pmid:21824039
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Valavanidis A,Vlachogianni T, Fiotakis C. 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG): A Critical Biomarker of Oxidative Stress and Carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009; 27: 120–139. () pmid:19412858
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Pawlak K, Pawlak D, Mysliwiec M. Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase plasma levels as a new useful clinical biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin Biochem. 2005; 38: 700–705. () pmid:15963971
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Del Rio D, Stewart AJ, Pellegrini N. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2005; 15: 316–328. () pmid:16054557
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Seet RC, Lee CYJ, Loke WM, Huang SH, Huang H, Looi WF, et al. Biomarkers of oxidative damage in cigarette smokers: which biomarkers might reflect acute versus chronic oxidative stress? Free Radic Biol Med. 2011; 50: 1787–1793. () pmid:21420490
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Dribe M. Long-term effects of childbearing on mortality: evidence from pre-industrial Sweden. Popul Stud (NY). 2004; 58: 297–310. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Dekker JM, Schouten EG. Number of pregnancies and risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1894–1895. () pmid:8267782
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J, Flegal KM, Kelsey JL, Balanger A, et al. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1528–1533. () pmid:8267704
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Keaney JF, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Wilson PWF, Lipinska I, Corey D, et al. Obesity and systemic oxidative stress: clinical correlates of oxidative stress in the Framingham Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23: 434–439. () pmid:12615693
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Kontush A, Chantepie S, Chapman MJ. Small, dense HDL particles exert potent protection of atherogenic LDL against oxidative stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23: 1881–1888. () pmid:12920049
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Sarban S, Kocyigit A, Yazar M, Isikan UE. Plasma total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation, and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin Biochem. 2005;38: 981–986. () pmid:16150434
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Idonije OB, Festus O, Okhiai O, Akpamu U. A Comparative Study of the Status of Oxidative Stress in Pregnant Nigerian Women. Res J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 4: 28–36. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Idogun E, Odiegwu M, Momoh S, Okonofua F. Effect of pregnancy on total antioxidant capacity in Nigerian women. Pak J Med Sci. Q. 2008; 24: 2–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Hung TH, Lo LM, Chiu TH, Li MJ, Yeh YL, Chen SF. A longitudinal study of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in women with uncomplicated pregnancies throughout gestation. Reprod Sci. 2010; 17: 401–409. () pmid:20167745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Brown L, Regnault T, Rozance P, Barry J, Hay WW Jr. Pregnancy and feto-placental growth: macronutrients. In: Symonds ME, Ramsay MM, editors. Maternal-fetal nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

[ref35] 35. Butte NF. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in pregnancy: normal compared with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 71: 1256s–1261s. pmid:10799399
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Albera E, Kankofer M. The comparison of antioxidative/oxidative profile in colostrum, milk and blood of early post-partum cows during their first and second lactation. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010; 45: e417–425. () pmid:20210886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Albera E, Kankofer M. The comparison of antioxidative/oxidative profile in blood, colostrum and milk of early post-partum cows and their newborns. Reprod Domest Anim. 2011; 46: 763–769. () pmid:21198972
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Fletcher QE, Selman C, Boutin S, McAdam AG, Woods SB, Seo AY, et al. Oxidative damage increases with reproductive energy expenditure and is reduced by food-supplementation. Evolution. 2013; 67: 1527–1536. () pmid:23617928
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Tigas S, Sunehag A, Haymond MW. Metabolic adaptation to feeding and fasting during lactation in humans. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2002; 87: 302–307. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Stuebe A, Rich-Edwards J. The reset hypothesis: lactation and maternal metabolism. Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26: 81–88. () pmid:19031350
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Mobbs CV, Mastaitis JW, Zhang M, Isoda F, Cheng H, Yen K. Secrets of the lac operon. Glucose hysteresis as a mechanism in dietary restriction, aging and disease. In: Mobs CV, Yen K, Hof PR, editors. Mechanisms of Dietary Restriction in Aging and Disease. Interdiscip Top Gerontol. 2007; 35: 39–68. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Fisher G, Schwartz DD, Quindry J, Barberio MD, Foster EB, Jones KW, et al. Lymphocyte enzymatic antioxidant responses to oxidative stress following high-intensity interval exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2011; 110: 730–737. () pmid:21127208
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Jasienska G, Ellison PT, Galbarczyk A, Jasienski M, Kalemba-Drozdz M, Kapiszewska M, et al. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism is related to differences in potential fertility in women: a case of antagonistic pleiotropy? Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282: 20142395. () pmid:25673673
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Miller MW, Sadeh N. Traumatic stress, oxidative stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: neurodegeneration and the accelerated-aging hypothesis. Mol Psychiatry. Macmillan Publishers Limited; 2014;19: 1156–1162. () pmid:25245500
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Schöttker B, Saum KU, Jansen EH, Boffetta P, Trichopoulou A, Holleczek B, et al. Oxidative stress markers and all-cause mortality at older age: a population-based cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70: 518–524. pmid:25070660
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Semba RD, Ferrucci L, Sun K, Walston J, Varadhan R, Guralnik JM, et al. Oxidative stress is associated with greater mortality in older women living in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55: 1421–1425. () pmid:17767685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Stearns SC. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quart Rev Biol. 1976; 51: 3–47. () pmid:778893
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Stearns SC. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol. 1989; 3: 259–268. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Lycett JE, Dunbar RIM, Voland E. Longevity and the costs of reproduction in a historical human population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000; 267: 31–35. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Doblhammer G, Oeppen J. Reproduction and longevity among the British peerage: the effect of frailty and health selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 270: 1541–1547. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Hurt LS, Ronsmans C, Quigley M. Does the number of sons born affect long-term mortality of parents? A cohort study in rural Bangladesh. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 273: 149–155. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Hank K. Childbearing history, later-life health, and mortality in Germany. Popul Stud. 2010; 64: 275–291. ()
View Article
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Atsma F, Bartelink MLE, Grobbee DE, Rutten A, Bots ML, Prokop M, van der Schouw YT. Reproductive factors, metabolic factors, and coronary artery calcification in older women. Menopause. 2008; 15: 899–904. () pmid:18779678
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Beeri MS, et al. Number of children is associated with neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease in women. Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 30: 1184–1191. () pmid:18079025
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Naver K, Lundbye-Christensen S, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Nilas L, Secher NJ, Rasmussen S, Ovesen P. Parity and risk of diabetes in a Danish nationwide birth cohort. Diabet Med. 2011; 28: 43–47. () pmid:21166844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Guan H-B, Wu Q-J, Gong T-T. Parity and kidney cancer risk: evidence from epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22: 2345–2353. () pmid:24108791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Ceriello A, Motz E. Is oxidative stress the pathogenic mechanism underlying insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease? The common soil hypothesis revisited. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 816–823. () pmid:14976002
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] PubMed/NCBI

[206] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Bonda DJ, Wang X, Perry G, Nunomura A, Tabaton M, Zhu X, Smith MA. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease: a possibility for prevention. Neuropharmacology. 2010; 59: 290–294. () pmid:20394761
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] PubMed/NCBI

[210] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Subjects

General questionnaire and reproductive history

Anthropometrics

Blood sample analysis

Urine samples analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

Descriptive statistics and simple correlations

Oxidative stress in women with low and high reproductive effort

Association between biomarkers of oxidative stress and reproductive effort

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References