Abdominal Muscle Activity during Mechanical Ventilation Increases Lung Injury in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Xianming Zhang; Weiliang Wu; Yongcheng Zhu; Ying Jiang; Juan Du; Rongchang Chen

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145694

Abstract

Objective

It has proved that muscle paralysis was more protective for injured lung in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the precise mechanism is not clear. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that abdominal muscle activity during mechanically ventilation increases lung injury in severe ARDS.

Methods

Eighteen male Beagles were studied under mechanical ventilation with anesthesia. Severe ARDS was induced by repetitive oleic acid infusion. After lung injury, Beagles were randomly assigned into spontaneous breathing group (BIPAP_SB) and abdominal muscle paralysis group (BIPAP_AP). All groups were ventilated with BIPAP model for 8h, and the high pressure titrated to reached a tidal volume of 6ml/kg, the low pressure was set at 10 cmH₂O, with I:E ratio 1:1, and respiratory rate adjusted to a PaCO₂ of 35–60 mmHg. Six Beagles without ventilator support comprised the control group. Respiratory variables, end-expiratory volume (EELV) and gas exchange were assessed during mechanical ventilation. The levels of Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 in lung tissue and plasma were measured by qRT-PCR and ELISA respectively. Lung injury scores were determined at end of the experiment.

Results

For the comparable ventilator setting, as compared with BIPAP_SB group, the BIPAP_AP group presented higher EELV (427±47 vs. 366±38 ml) and oxygenation index (293±36 vs. 226±31 mmHg), lower levels of IL-6(216.6±48.0 vs. 297.5±71.2 pg/ml) and IL-8(246.8±78.2 vs. 357.5±69.3 pg/ml) in plasma, and lower express levels of IL-6 mRNA (15.0±3.8 vs. 21.2±3.7) and IL-8 mRNA (18.9±6.8 vs. 29.5±7.9) in lung tissues. In addition, less lung histopathology injury were revealed in the BIPAP_AP group (22.5±2.0 vs. 25.2±2.1).

Conclusion

Abdominal muscle activity during mechanically ventilation is one of the injurious factors in severe ARDS, so abdominal muscle paralysis might be an effective strategy to minimize ventilator-induce lung injury.

Citation: Zhang X, Wu W, Zhu Y, Jiang Y, Du J, Chen R (2016) Abdominal Muscle Activity during Mechanical Ventilation Increases Lung Injury in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694

Editor: Xiao Su, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA

Received: August 15, 2015; Accepted: December 6, 2015; Published: January 8, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All data files underlying the findings described in the paper are available from the Figshare database (accession number(s) http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1590977).

Funding: This work was supported by National Project 973, 2009CB522108 (Study on the system for the prevention and control of lung injury).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Mechanical ventilation is the main therapy for patients suffering from ARDS, which will improve oxygenation, reduce the work of breathing and prevent muscle fatigue. However, mechanical ventilation itself might aggravate lung injury [1,2]. Although there is a widely use of the mechanical ventilation strategies such as low tidal volume, lower airway plateau pressure, optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), permissive hypercapnia, patients with ARDS still has a higher morbidity and mortality in the past two decades [3].

Invasive mechanical ventilation for patients with ARDS include preserving spontaneous breathing (SB)and controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV). Whether SB should be preserved has been debated for many years. Animal experiments [4,5] and clinical studies [6] have reported that CMV may increase alveolar collapse and inhomogeneity of pulmonary parenchyma, and thus induce further lung injury. SB during mechanical ventilation results in better aeration and less atelectasis in lung dependent zones, and less hyperinflation in nondependent lung zones in ARDS [7]. Some researchers have claimed that, even in the most severe ARDS, preserving SB activity was associated with beneficial effects in pulmonary function, speeding of weaning, and discharge from the ICU [8]. However, in a recent multicenter trial, Papazian et al [9] found that, in patients with severe ARDS, muscle paralysis was associated with a lower adjusted 90 days morbidity than patients that received placebo.Yoshida et al [10] also found that in animal with severe ARDS, muscle paralysis might be more protective for injured lung, and SB could worsen lung injury. However, the precise mechanism is unclear.

Until now, it is unknown whether the activity of abdominal muscles has any impact on VALI. Caironi et al [11] has recently proved that the amount of lung cyclically recruitment and decruitment, but not lung stress and strain, leads to the increase of mortality in ARDS patients. Expiration in mechanical ventilation, as well as in normal breathing, is a passive phenomenon produced due to the lung elastic recoil forces. However, in the presence of increased respiratory driving, expiratory muscles, especially the abdominal muscles may actively participate in breathing and increase intra-abdominal pressure. It has been proved that the increase of intra-abdominal pressure even 10 cmH₂O may have injurious impacts on organ functions [12] and aggravate lung damage [13]. Therefore, we hypothesized that abdominal muscle activity during mechanically ventilation increases lung injury in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. In this study we explored the hypothesis.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Guangzhou medical university. Experimental animals obtained from the Kangda laboratory animals Science & Technology Company of Gaoyao city and the care and treatment of the animals were in compliance with the university standard.

Animal Preparation

Eighteen adult male Beagles (10.5–14.3 kg) were recruited in this experiment. After intramuscular injection of 3% pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg), the Beagles were studied in the supine position and anesthetize with Propofol by continuous infusion (0.16–0.5 mg/ kg/ h). Paralysis was achieved with pancuronium(bolus = 0.16 mg /kg, followed by 0.08 mg /kg/ h). After orotracheal intubation with an 8.0 mm ID cuff tube, lungs were ventilated with the ventilator EVITA 4 (Dräger Medical AG, Lübeck, Germany). Volume-controlled model with a tidal volume (VT) of 10 ml/kg, PEEP 5 cm H₂O, I:E ratio 1:1, FiO₂ 1.0 and the respiratory rate(RR)was adjusted to maintain PaCO₂ between 35 and 45 mmHg. Intravenous fluid (lactated Ringer^’s; 6 ml /kg/ h) were administrated to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure more than 70 mmHg. The right jugular vein and femoral artery were catheterized and connected to PiCCO system for measure of core temperature, mean arterial blood pressure(MPA) and obtain artery blood sample for gas analysis. A multipair esophageal electrode-balloon combined catheter was put into the esophagus, and airway occlusion technique was used to check the proper position [14]. Airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Peso) and intragastric pressure (Pgas) from a side tap was connected to the end tracheal. A MLT300L respiratory flow head was used to measure airflow, and integrated airflow to obtain tidal volume. Signal of Paw, Peso, Pgas, airflow, diaphragmatic esophageal surface electromyography (EMGdi) and abdominal muscles surface electromyography (EMGab) were recorded by powerlab 16/30 SP and chart 7.2 software on a Mac book Computer. Body temperature was constant throughout the whole experiment at 37°C with a heating pad.

Experimental Protocol

After obtaining baseline measurements and 30 minute stabilization, lung injury was induced by the total dose of 0.30 ml/kg purified oleic acid. If necessary, additional injection oleic acid (0.2 ml each time) was given until PaO₂/FiO₂ were below 100 mmHg. A stable severe ARDS model was established when the PaO₂/FiO₂ value remain less than 100 mmHg within 30 min [15,16,17]. After obtaining the measurements at injury, ventilator mode switched to BIPAP mode and the animals were randomly divided into SB group (BIPAP_SB group) and abdominal muscle paralysis group(BIPAP_AP group). After muscles paralysis, the P_high titrated to achieve a VT of 6 ml/kg, P_low was set at 10 cm H₂O, with FiO₂ 1.0, I:E was fixed at 1:1 to minimize changes in mean Paw. The mandatory RR adjusted a PaCO₂ of 35 to 60 mmHg. In BIPAP_SB group, in order to recover SB, stopped the injection of pancuronium and gradually reduced the dose of Propofol. According to previous studies, in order to ensure a strong effort of unsupported SB during BIPAP, the mandatory RR was adjusted to maintain the percentage of minute ventilation (MV) of unsupported SB to total MV >50% (Fig 1).Other ventilator settings remained the same as the above setting. SB was monitored by online registration of the Peso signal. The amount of SB was quantified by measuring minute volumes before and after neuromuscular blockade. In the BIPAP_AP group, the abdominal muscles paralysis method was described as Warner DO[18], a flexible epidural catheter was placed percutaneous through the second coccygeal vertebra and advanced until the tip closed to the L4 or L5 vertebra in the epidural space as confirmed by visual observation and autopsy. Through the epidural catheter, 2% Lidocaine was injected in 0.5 ml increment until the EMGab was abolished and followed by continuous infusion of Ropivacaine Hydrochloride 1-2ml/h. All the other ventilator setting were totally same with BIPAP_SB group.

Download:

Fig 1. Representative respiratory tracings.

Representative respiratory tracings of airway pressure(Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes), intragastric pressure (Pgas),transpumonary pressure (PL),Airflow、abdominal muscles surface electromyography (EMGab)and diaphragmatic esophageal surface electromyography (EMGdi) in BIPAP_SB,BIPAP_AP group in representative animals. BIPAP_SB = biphasic positive airway pressure with SB; BIPAP_AP = biphasic positive airway pressure with abdominal muscles paralysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.g001

Respiratory Mechanics

All variables were recorded continuously. Mean Paw for the BIPAP mode can be calculated as follows [19,20]: (P_high × T_high + P_low × T_low) / (T_high+ T_low), where the T_high is the length of time for P_high; T_low: length of time during P_low. If the ratio of T_high: T_low is fixed at 1:1, then the mean Paw could be kept constant when we changed the RR.Using above method adjust ventilator, we could maintain the level of mean Paw comparable in our study. The transpulmonary pressure (P_L) was calculated as Paw–Peso. Peak Paw were recorded. Peso swings as the frequency per minute of each type of breathing cycle was used to calculate the total RR (S1 Fig). The product of inspiratory Peso vs. time (PTP) were determined.

EELV

EELV at PEEP or P_low was measured by simplified helium dilution method. A flexible tube inserted between endotracheal tube and the circuit Y and clamped during an end-expiratory pause at PEEP. Anesthesia balloon filled with1.5 L known gas mixture of Helium (13.4%) in oxyge was then connected to the tube. After releasing the clamp, 10 tidal volumes compressing were performed rhythmically to dilute the helium gas mixture with the gas contained in Beagles lungs. Concentration of the helium in the bag was then measured with the helium analyzer (c-square company, USA), the following formula was used to computed the EELV (ml) = - Vi, where Vi: initial gas volume in the bag; Ci: initial helium concentration; and Cf: the final helium concentration [21].

End-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂)

A pressure differential pneumotachometer was used to measure end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂). The alveolar dead space fraction (VD/VT) was calculated by [22]: VD/VT =

Levels of Inflammatory Mediators

Plasma samples was collected at baseline, lung injury and at the end of 8h MV. After centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min,Supernatant aliquots were frozen at -80°C for analysis. Plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were measured using an ELISA kit for dogs (Genequick, Guangzhou, China) according to manufacturer protocol. Expression levels of IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA in lung tissues were measured by qRT-PCR as previously described [20]. GAPDH primers were used as an internal control. The sense and antisense of the primers (5’-3’) used for IL-6 and IL-8 were:

IL-6 F: TGACCACTCCTGACCCAACC, R: TCCAGACTCCGCAGGATGAG;
IL8F: ACTTCCAAGCTGGCTGTTGC, R: CTGGCATCGAAGTTCTGAACTG.

Histopathological Examination

After 8 hours of ventilation, all Beagles were euthanized by intravenous injection of potassium chloride, and lung tissues were harvested (S2 Fig). Samples were obtained separately from the upper lobe, middle lobe and ventral, lateral and dorsal sections of the right lower lobe. Samples were fixed in 10% formalin and were stained by HE for histological analysis. All sections were examined by the same pathologist and were evaluated by the following lung injury scores system [4,23]: 0, minimal changes; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, maximal changes. For each slide including the following criteria: congestion, alveolar and interstitial edema, granulocytes, lymphocytes and erythrocytes infiltration, fibrinous exudates and micro thrombi. The sum of pathological score was calculated by adding the cumulative lung injury sub-scores (maximal value is 44).

Statistical Analysis

All date were represented as means ± SDs. Normal distribution of the data were assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparison of data between two experimental groups with each other was performed using the unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Comparison of the continuous date within the same group before and after the experiments were evaluated by Paired t tests. ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for multiple-group comparisons as appropriate. Effects of time and group differences on respiratory variables were evaluated by Repeated Measures Two-way ANOVA. The LSD post-hoc test was used as appropriate. IBM SPSS Statistics 21 was used for statistical analyses. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if P was less than 0.05.

Results

Fig 1 Shows tracing records of Paw, Pes, Pgas, P_L, Airflow, EMGab and EMGdi for the two groups in representative animals. There were no difference in the value of mean Paw, and the only difference was the absence of abdominal muscle activity in BIPAP_AP group. SB occurred rarely at P_high in the experimental groups. The average percentage of minute ventilation of unassisted SB relative to total minute ventilation in the BIPAP_SB group was above 50%.After abdominal muscle paralysis, the percentage decreased from 50%-100% to 10% -50%.

As shown in Table 1, at baseline, there are no differences in HR、MAP between the groups during the entire experiment. There were also comparable mean Paw between the experimental groups. The PaCO₂ level was less than 60 mmHg in all of the animals. Due to activity of the diaphragm and abdominal muscles, the BIPAP_SB group presented higher swing of Pes, Pgas and peak P_L than BIPAP_AP group. After abdominal muscle paralysis, BIPAP_AP group presented lower swing of Peso, Pgas, peak P_L, more even P_L and longer time on P_high (S1 Table). Moreover, the BIPAP_AP group resulted in a higher EELV (427±47 ml) compared with the BIPAP_SB group (366±38 ml) (Fig 2). Meanwhile, BIPAP_AP group showed a lower VD/VT than BIPAP_SB group (Fig 3). BIPAP_AP group showed a trend toward improving PaO₂/FiO₂, but not in BIPAP_SB group. The difference in PaO₂/FiO₂ between two groups was statistically significant after 2h MV (p = 0.025). PTP decreased gradually from BIPAP_SB group to BIPAP_AP group.

Download:

Fig 2. Time course of the VD/VT.

Time course of the dead space volume to tidal volume (VD/VT) ratio in experimental groups (n = 6 per group). BIPAP_SB = biphasic positive airway pressure with SB; BIPAP_AP = biphasic positive airway pressure with abdominal muscles paralysis; SB = spontaneous breathing; *P < 0.05, vs. other groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Time course of the EELV.

Time course of the end- expiratory lung volume (EELV) in experimental groups (n = 6 per group). BIPAP_SB = biphasic positive airway pressure with SB; BIPAP_AP = biphasic positive airway pressure with abdominal muscles paralysis; SB = spontaneous breathing; *P < 0.05, vs. other groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.g003

Download:

Table 1. Respiratory Measurements.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.t001

As shown in Fig 4: BIPAP_AP group yielded lower levels of IL-6 (216.6±48.0 pg/ml) and IL-8 (246.8±78.2 pg/ml) in plasma compared with BIPAP_SB groups (IL-6:297.5±71.2 pg/ml;IL-8:357.5±69.3 pg/ml) after 8h MV (p<0.05).Moreover, mRNA expression levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in lung tissue were lower in BIPAP_AP group (IL-6:15.0±3.8, IL-8: 18.9±6.8) than in BIPAP_SB group (IL-6:21.2±3.7, IL-8:29.5±7.9), and all experimental groups were higher than the control group.

Download:

Fig 4. The Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in plasma and the mRNA expression levels in the lung tissue.

The Levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 in plasma (*P < 0.05 vs. other groups) and the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in the lung tissue after 8h mechanical ventilation (*P < 0.05 vs. control group; #P < 0.05 vs. BIPAP_AP group;). BIPAP_SB = biphasic positive airway pressure with SB, n = 6; BIPAP_AP = biphasic positive airway pressure with abdominal muscles paralysis, n = 6; SB = spontaneous breathing; NS = no significantly difference;

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.g004

As shown in Table 2, The sum of lung injury scores was lower in BIPAP_AP group (22.5±2.0) than that in BIPAP_SB group (25.2±2.1), but the sum of scores in the experimental groups was higher than that in the control group. The BIPAP_AP group showed less congestion, alveolar edema, alveolar infiltration of neutrophils and interstitial, and less infiltration of lymphocyte. The BIPAP_SB group showed increased alveolar collapse, alveolar congestion, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and interstitial edema with hyaline membrane formation (Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 5. Histopathological examination.

Representative appearances and photomicrographs of hematoxylineosin–stained lung sections (magnification ×200) from control group (A, n = 6), BIPAP_SB = biphasic positive airway pressure with SB (B, n = 6), and BIPAP_AP = biphasic positive airway pressure with abdominal muscles paralysis (C, n = 6).The control group had minimal alveolar congestion, and inflammatory cell infiltration. The BIPAP_AP group showed mild thickening of the alveolar walls, alveolar congestion, and hemorrhage. In the BIPAP_SB group, inflammatory cell infiltration, thickening of the alveolar walls, alveolar congestion, and more prominent hemorrhagic areas were observed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.g005

Download:

Table 2. Histological subscores in experimental groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.t002

Discussion

In an oleic acid- induced model of experimental ARDS in beagles, our findings suggested that abdominal muscle activity during mechanically ventilation increases lung injury in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

To our knowledge, no previous experimental study has investigated the effect of abdominal muscle on lung damage in ARDS. We used an oleic acid-induced experimental ARDS because this model has reproduced many basic characteristics of ARDS [17]. For different animals, the same dose of oleic acid administered by the same route can induce a reasonably reproducible lung injury [24]. Different ventilated strategies have been proposed in ARDS. BIPAP mode was chosen because it can be easily modulated to maintain comparable levels of ventilator support in the three groups. By the methods of adjusting ventilator setting, the levels of mean Paw were comparable, the only difference was with or without abdominal muscles activity which were visible from electromyogram. In our study, we used a super syringe method to make a static pressure–volume curve and our results showed that the lower inflection points were 8-9cm H₂O for lung injury. So we set P_low (PEEP) at 10 cm H₂O for the three groups.

Gas Exchange

With comparable ventilator setting, the oxygenation index were significantly higher in BIPAP_AP group than BIPAP_SB group after 2h MV. This outcome proved that abdominal muscle activity may worsen gas exchange. There were several reasons to explain this phenomenon: first, activity of the abdominal muscle was associated with decreased EELV. Douglas and colleagues [25] observed in their study that EELV was parallel to oxygenation. Similarly, a better gas exchange was also observed after abdominal muscle paralysis. Second, activity of the abdominal muscle was associated with increased PTP, which represented a decrease of total work of breathing and oxygen consumption.Third, activity of the abdominal muscle resulted in an decreased P_L on P_high, which could recruit the collapse alveolar units and result in greater lung units available for oxygenation [26]. Fourth, abdominal muscle activity increase of intra-abdominal pressure which is associated with the decrease of P_L and respiratory compliance on T_high, which can lead to a loss in lung volume and hypoxemia episodes [27]. Fifth, activity of the abdominal muscle resulted in worsen blood reperfusion to nondependent lung area, and led to a higher VD/VT and greater inhomogeneity of lung ventilation to perfusion. All the above factors can worsen gas exchange.

Lung Injury

Ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) includes volutrauma, atelectrauma and biotrauma., and these injuries may eventually lead to severe systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ failure. No previous studies have proved the relationships between abdominal muscle and VALI in ARDS. In an oleic acid-induced ARDS model, our study showed that BIPAP_AP had lower mRNA expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in lung tissues and less total cumulative histopathological lung injury scores compared with BIPAP_SB group. These findings suggested that activity of the abdominal muscle during mechanically ventilation was one of the injurious factors in severe ARDS. Various mechanisms may explain the findings:①Activity of the abdominal muscle can increase the value of △Pes which has been shown to promote the formation of pulmonary edema and aggravate lung injury[26]. ②Activity of the abdominal muscle can increase end-expiratory alveolar pressure at the start of expiratory. ③Activity of the abdominal muscle can increase intra-abdominal hypertension. It has been proved that activity of the abdominal muscles can increase IAP by up to 20 cmH₂O [28]. When intra-abdominal hypertension existed, unopposed increase of intra-abdominal pressure by spontaneous expiratory can cause greater lung injury by reducing P_L in dependent zones [13]. ④Activity of the abdominal muscle can decrease EELV, and make part of lung units breathing in the lower inflection point of the P-V curve and cause so-called “low volume injury” which is associated with the cyclic opening–closing of lung units and aggregates lung injury by interfacial forces. ⑤Activity of the abdominal muscle allows PEEP to be bad controlled and resulting in increased “atelectrauma”. ⑥Activity of the abdominal muscle resulted in decreased P_L which was presumed to aggravate lung injury. ⑦Activity of the abdominal muscle resulted in decreased EELV, so lung strain, a major determinant of VALI, might be further increased.

Limitations

There are several limitations in this study. First, the work was done in an oleic acid-induced ARDS model. Therefore, we are not sure whether these results can be reproduced in the other ARDS models. Second, due to protective strategy with a LTV used in this experiment, we cannot preclude the protective effects of abdominal muscle on a high tidal volume injurious ventilation. Third, the RR and nervous distribution of canine may not be the same as human being, so we cannot guarantee our data can be used for patients and further studies are needed. Finally, in BIPAP_AP group, Lidocaine and Ropivacaine hydrochloride were used for epidural anesthesia to paralyze abdominal muscles, so we cannot rule out the possibility that these drugs affected pulmonary inflammatory response.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in a canine model of oleic acid-induced severe ARDS, abdominal muscle activity during mechanically ventilation increases lung injury in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, so abdominal muscles paralysis minimize ventilator-induced lung injury in early, severe patients with ARDS.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Representative respiratory tracings of BIPAP_SB and BIPAP_AP group in representative animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Representative appearance of the lung after 8h ventilation in different groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.s002

(PDF)

S1 Table. Representative data in different groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145694.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Ph.D. Yuanda Xu, Dongming Hua, for assistance in the experiments, to Dr.Ruibing Wu, for pathological analysis, We also thank Dr.Zhimin Lin,for excellent technical assistance, and Dr. Yuanzi Hua for his careful review of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RC XZ YZ JD. Performed the experiments: XZ WW YZ YJ RC. Analyzed the data: RC XZ WW YZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RC XZ WW YZ. Wrote the paper: XZ RC.

References

1. de Abreu MG, Guldner A, Pelosi P. Spontaneous breathing activity in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012; 25: 148–155. pmid:22227446
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2126–2136. pmid:24283226
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Roy S, Habashi N, Sadowitz B, Andrews P, Ge L, Wang G, et al. Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury. Shock. 2013; 39: 28–38. pmid:23247119
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Xia J, Zhang H, Sun B, Yang R, He H, Zhan Q. Spontaneous Breathing with Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Attenuates Lung Injury in Hydrochloric Acid-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 1441–1449. pmid:24722174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Carvalho AR, Spieth PM, Pelosi P, Beda A, Lopes AJ, Neykova B, et al. Pressure support ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure improve oxygenation by redistribution of pulmonary blood flow. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109: 856–865. pmid:19690258
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Putensen C, Mutz NJ, Putensen-Himmer G, Zinserling J. Spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support improves ventilation-perfusion distributions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159: 1241–1248. pmid:10194172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Defosse J, Magnusson A, Putensen C, et al. Spontaneous breathing improves lung aeration in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99: 376–384. pmid:12883410
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H. The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006; 12: 13–18. pmid:16394778
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1107–1116. pmid:20843245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41: 536–545. pmid:23263584
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri M, Quintel M, Russo SG, et al. Lung opening and closing during ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 181: 578–586. pmid:19910610
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Malbrain ML, Deeren D, De Potter TJ. Intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill: it is time to pay attention. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11: 156–171. pmid:15758597
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Henzler D, Hochhausen N, Bensberg R, Schachtrupp A, Biechele S, Rossaint R, et al. Effects of preserved spontaneous breathing activity during mechanical ventilation in experimental intra-abdominal hypertension. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36: 1427–1435. pmid:20237763
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982; 126: 788–791. pmid:7149443
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Suh GY, Chung MP, Park SJ, Park JW, Kim HC, Kim H, et al. Partial liquid ventilation with perfluorocarbon improves gas exchange and decreases inflammatory response in oleic acid-induced lung injury in beagles. J Korean Med Sci. 1999; 14: 613–622. pmid:10642938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Schweiger JW, Downs JB, Smith RA. Chest wall disruption with and without acute lung injury: effects of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on ventilation and perfusion relationships. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 2364–2370. pmid:14501968
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Wang HM, Bodenstein M, Markstaller K. Overview of the pathology of three widely used animal models of acute lung injury. Eur Surg Res. 2008; 40: 305–316. pmid:18349543
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Warner DO, Brichant JF, Ritman EL, Rehder K. Chest wall motion during epidural anesthesia in dogs. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991; 70: 539–547. pmid:2022544
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Frawley PM, Habashi NM. Airway pressure release ventilation: theory and practice. AACN Clin Issues. 2001; 12: 234–246; quiz 328–329. pmid:11759551
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Xia J, Sun B, He H, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhan Q. Effect of spontaneous breathing on ventilator-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated healthy rabbits: a randomized, controlled, experimental study. Crit Care. 2011; 15: R244. pmid:22018091
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Patroniti N, Bellani G, Manfio A, Maggioni E, Giuffrida A, Foti G, et al. Lung volume in mechanically ventilated patients: measurement by simplified helium dilution compared to quantitative CT scan. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 282–289. pmid:14714108
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Hardman JG, Aitkenhead AR. Estimating alveolar dead space from the arterial to end-tidal CO(2) gradient: a modeling analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 1846–1851. pmid:14633572
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Dembinski R, Hochhausen N, Terbeck S, Uhlig S, Dassow C, Schneider M, et al. Pumpless extracorporeal lung assist for protective mechanical ventilation in experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 2359–2366. pmid:17944027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Matute-Bello G, Frevert CW, Martin TR. Animal models of acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 295: L379–399. pmid:18621912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Douglas WW, Rehder K, Beynen FM, Sessler AD, Marsh HM. Improved oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory failure: the prone position. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977; 115: 559–566. pmid:322557
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Daoud EG, Farag HL, Chatburn RL. Airway pressure release ventilation: what do we know. Respir Care. 2012; 57: 282–292. pmid:21762559
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Esquer C, Claure N, D'Ugard C, Wada Y, Bancalari E. Mechanisms of hypoxemia episodes in spontaneously breathing preterm infants after mechanical ventilation. Neonatology. 2008; 94: 100–104. pmid:18277057
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Duggan JE, Drummond GB. Abdominal muscle activity and intraabdominal pressure after upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 598–603. pmid:2529794
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. de Abreu MG, Guldner A, Pelosi P. Spontaneous breathing activity in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012; 25: 148–155. pmid:22227446
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2126–2136. pmid:24283226
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Roy S, Habashi N, Sadowitz B, Andrews P, Ge L, Wang G, et al. Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury. Shock. 2013; 39: 28–38. pmid:23247119
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Xia J, Zhang H, Sun B, Yang R, He H, Zhan Q. Spontaneous Breathing with Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Attenuates Lung Injury in Hydrochloric Acid-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 1441–1449. pmid:24722174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Carvalho AR, Spieth PM, Pelosi P, Beda A, Lopes AJ, Neykova B, et al. Pressure support ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure improve oxygenation by redistribution of pulmonary blood flow. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109: 856–865. pmid:19690258
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Putensen C, Mutz NJ, Putensen-Himmer G, Zinserling J. Spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support improves ventilation-perfusion distributions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159: 1241–1248. pmid:10194172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Defosse J, Magnusson A, Putensen C, et al. Spontaneous breathing improves lung aeration in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99: 376–384. pmid:12883410
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H. The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006; 12: 13–18. pmid:16394778
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1107–1116. pmid:20843245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41: 536–545. pmid:23263584
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri M, Quintel M, Russo SG, et al. Lung opening and closing during ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 181: 578–586. pmid:19910610
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Malbrain ML, Deeren D, De Potter TJ. Intra-abdominal hypertension in the critically ill: it is time to pay attention. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11: 156–171. pmid:15758597
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Henzler D, Hochhausen N, Bensberg R, Schachtrupp A, Biechele S, Rossaint R, et al. Effects of preserved spontaneous breathing activity during mechanical ventilation in experimental intra-abdominal hypertension. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36: 1427–1435. pmid:20237763
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982; 126: 788–791. pmid:7149443
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Suh GY, Chung MP, Park SJ, Park JW, Kim HC, Kim H, et al. Partial liquid ventilation with perfluorocarbon improves gas exchange and decreases inflammatory response in oleic acid-induced lung injury in beagles. J Korean Med Sci. 1999; 14: 613–622. pmid:10642938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Schweiger JW, Downs JB, Smith RA. Chest wall disruption with and without acute lung injury: effects of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on ventilation and perfusion relationships. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 2364–2370. pmid:14501968
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Wang HM, Bodenstein M, Markstaller K. Overview of the pathology of three widely used animal models of acute lung injury. Eur Surg Res. 2008; 40: 305–316. pmid:18349543
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Warner DO, Brichant JF, Ritman EL, Rehder K. Chest wall motion during epidural anesthesia in dogs. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991; 70: 539–547. pmid:2022544
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Frawley PM, Habashi NM. Airway pressure release ventilation: theory and practice. AACN Clin Issues. 2001; 12: 234–246; quiz 328–329. pmid:11759551
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Xia J, Sun B, He H, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhan Q. Effect of spontaneous breathing on ventilator-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated healthy rabbits: a randomized, controlled, experimental study. Crit Care. 2011; 15: R244. pmid:22018091
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Patroniti N, Bellani G, Manfio A, Maggioni E, Giuffrida A, Foti G, et al. Lung volume in mechanically ventilated patients: measurement by simplified helium dilution compared to quantitative CT scan. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 282–289. pmid:14714108
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Hardman JG, Aitkenhead AR. Estimating alveolar dead space from the arterial to end-tidal CO(2) gradient: a modeling analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 1846–1851. pmid:14633572
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Dembinski R, Hochhausen N, Terbeck S, Uhlig S, Dassow C, Schneider M, et al. Pumpless extracorporeal lung assist for protective mechanical ventilation in experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 2359–2366. pmid:17944027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Matute-Bello G, Frevert CW, Martin TR. Animal models of acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 295: L379–399. pmid:18621912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Douglas WW, Rehder K, Beynen FM, Sessler AD, Marsh HM. Improved oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory failure: the prone position. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977; 115: 559–566. pmid:322557
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Daoud EG, Farag HL, Chatburn RL. Airway pressure release ventilation: what do we know. Respir Care. 2012; 57: 282–292. pmid:21762559
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Esquer C, Claure N, D'Ugard C, Wada Y, Bancalari E. Mechanisms of hypoxemia episodes in spontaneously breathing preterm infants after mechanical ventilation. Neonatology. 2008; 94: 100–104. pmid:18277057
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Duggan JE, Drummond GB. Abdominal muscle activity and intraabdominal pressure after upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 598–603. pmid:2529794
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

Abdominal Muscle Activity during Mechanical Ventilation Increases Lung Injury in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abdominal Muscle Activity during Mechanical Ventilation Increases Lung Injury in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animal Preparation

Experimental Protocol

Respiratory Mechanics

EELV

End-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂)

Levels of Inflammatory Mediators

Histopathological Examination

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Gas Exchange

Lung Injury

Limitations

Conclusion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Representative respiratory tracings of BIPAP_SB and BIPAP_AP group in representative animals.

S2 Fig. Representative appearance of the lung after 8h ventilation in different groups.

S1 Table. Representative data in different groups.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animal Preparation

Experimental Protocol

Respiratory Mechanics

EELV

End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2)

Levels of Inflammatory Mediators

Histopathological Examination

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Gas Exchange

Lung Injury

Limitations

Conclusion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Representative respiratory tracings of BIPAPSB and BIPAPAP group in representative animals.

S2 Fig. Representative appearance of the lung after 8h ventilation in different groups.

S1 Table. Representative data in different groups.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

End-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂)

S1 Fig. Representative respiratory tracings of BIPAP_SB and BIPAP_AP group in representative animals.