Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Programmed Cell Death Progresses Differentially in Epidermal and Mesophyll Cells of Lily Petals

Abstract

In the petals of some species of flowers, programmed cell death (PCD) begins earlier in mesophyll cells than in epidermal cells. However, PCD progression in each cell type has not been characterized in detail. We separately constructed a time course of biochemical signs and expression patterns of PCD-associated genes in epidermal and mesophyll cells in Lilium cv. Yelloween petals. Before visible signs of senescence could be observed, we found signs of PCD, including DNA degradation and decreased protein content in mesophyll cells only. In these cells, the total proteinase activity increased on the day after anthesis. Within 3 days after anthesis, the protein content decreased by 61.8%, and 22.8% of mesophyll cells was lost. A second peak of proteinase activity was observed on day 6, and the number of mesophyll cells decreased again from days 4 to 7. These biochemical and morphological results suggest that PCD progressed in steps during flower life in the mesophyll cells. PCD began in epidermal cells on day 5, in temporal synchrony with the time course of visible senescence. In the mesophyll cells, the KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase (LoCYP) and S1/P1 nuclease (LoNUC) genes were upregulated before petal wilting, earlier than in epidermal cells. In contrast, relative to that in the mesophyll cells, the expression of the SAG12 cysteine proteinase homolog (LoSAG12) drastically increased in epidermal cells in the final stage of senescence. These results suggest that multiple PCD-associated genes differentially contribute to the time lag of PCD progression between epidermal and mesophyll cells of lily petals.

Introduction

Petal senescence is usually classified as a process of programmed cell death (PCD) in which cellular constituents are degraded and nutrients are remobilized from senescent tissues [1,2]. Expression of multiple genes encoding, such as nucleases, lipases, and proteinases, are involved in the process of PCD [2].

The total proteinase activity increases and the protein content decreases with tepal senescence in Lilium, Iris, and Alstroemeria flowers [36]. Inhibitor studies indicated that the majority of proteinase activity during petal senescence is because of cysteine-type proteinases [4,5]. In petunia petals, multiple genes of cysteine proteinases demonstrated different temporal expression patterns through development and aging [6]. Six of nine cysteine proteinase genes were found to be upregulated in the natural aging process, whereas three genes were highly expressed before visible symptoms of senescence were observed in petals and were downregulated in the senescent stage [6].

The senescence-associated cysteine proteinase SAG12 (senescence-associated gene 12) has been identified in Arabidopsis leaves [7]. Expression of SAG12 genes was limited to chloroplast-containing mesophyll and guard cells in the senescing leaves of Arabidopsis and soybean [8]. SAG12 homologs cloned from petunia [6] and Ipomoea nil flowers [9] were upregulated in the senescent stage. However, the type of cells that mainly contain SAG12 transcripts in petals is unknown.

KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinases also play an important role in plant PCD [10,11]. KDEL-tailed proteinases are synthesized as proenzymes with a C-terminal KDEL endoplasmic reticulum retention signal. When the C-terminal KDEL sequence is removed with the prosequence, the enzyme is activated [11]. In petals, KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinases are found in petunia [6], Hemerocallis [12], and Lilium longiflorum [10]. Transcript levels of LlCYP, the L. longiflorum KDEL proteinase gene, were low from bud development to full bloom but increased in the senescent stage [10]. In contrast, the PhCP6 petunia KDEL proteinase gene was highly expressed in the early stage of flower life but was downregulated as senescence progressed [6].

Caspases are cysteine proteinases and important regulators of PCD in animal systems (e.g., [13]). Arabidopsis thaliana has four vacuolar processing enzyme (VPE) genes: αVPE, βVPE, γVPE, and δVPE, which encode enzymes with caspase-like activity. βVPE and δVPE are expressed in the seed and are involved in seed development [14,15]. αVPE and γVPE are preferentially expressed in vegetative tissues and are involved in PCD during leaf natural senescence and diverse stresses [15,16]. VPE was upregulated in senescent carnation petals [17], whereas in I. nil petals, the expression of the vegetative VPE homolog gradually increased during flower maturation and decreased in the senescent stage [18].

DNA degradation is widely observed during PCD in plant and animal cells. The putative nucleases Hemerocallis DSA6 [19] and daffodil DAFSAG1 [20] were upregulated with age-associated senescence in petals. The amino acid sequences of DSA6 and DAFSAG1 demonstrate similarity to S1- and/or P1-type nucleases. S1/P1 nucleases are the main class of enzyme involved in nucleic acid degradation in plant PCD [21].

Following PCD in petals, proteins, nucleic acids, and other macromolecules are degraded and transported from senescent tissues to developing parts for nutrient recycling [1,2]. Therefore, PCD in senescent petals appears to play an important role in nutrient recycling in plants.

In some species of petals, PCD begins earlier in mesophyll cells than in epidermal cells [2224]. Our previous study revealed that DNA degradation and collapse of cells had begun in mesophyll cells before the petals (inner tepals) had visibly wilted, whereas, in tulip petals, DNA degradation and cell collapse was not observed in epidermal cells at that time [22]. However, little is known regarding the biochemical features of PCD in epidermal and mesophyll cell types in petal. Furthermore, the molecular mechanism underlying the PCD time-lag between different tissues in petals remains unclear.

In this study, we investigated the temporal and spatial differences of PCD progression during natural senescence in Lilium flowers by separately sampling epidermal and mesophyll cells from petals. Lilium is an important commercial cut flower and a useful model for studying PCD mechanisms in an ethylene-insensitive species. We performed morphological observations and compared biochemical PCD signs, including DNA degradation, protein content, proteinase activity, and expression patterns of genes encoding SAG12, KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase, VPE, and S1/P1 nuclease in epidermal cells with those in mesophyll cells in Lilium petals. We discuss the contributions of PCD in epidermal and mesophyll cells to the recycling of nutrients during age-associated petal senescence.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Oriental-Trumpet hybrid lily (Lilium cv. Yelloween) flower stems were obtained from a commercial grower in Uonuma city, Niigata prefecture, Japan. The stems were harvested and sent to our laboratory on the same day. On the next day, we received the cut flower stems and placed them in distilled water (23°C, 70% relative humidity, 12-h photoperiod at 10 μmol m−2s−1 PPFD) until their anthers were dehiscent. Five to six buds were attached to each cut plant. We detached two or three flowers from the bottom part of each plant when their anthers were dehiscent (day 0). Individual cut flowers were placed in conical flasks containing 300-mL distilled water and held as described above until petal abscission.

In biochemical and molecular biological analyses, tweezers were used to drag a layer of sample adaxial and abaxial petal (inner tepal) epidermis away from the petal mesophyll [22]. The separated adaxial epidermal layer and the remaining mesophyll cells, including mesophyll and vascular cells, were sampled separately. Central bundles and the bottom part of each petal were excluded from petal samples. Each sample was frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80°C until use.

Measurement of petal fresh and dry weight

We investigated the life span of petals from 0 to 7 days after anthesis. To determine the fresh weight (FW) of whole petals, we sampled petals from three flowers at each time point, and recorded the fresh weight of each sample. Dry weight was measured after samples were dried in an electric oven at 80°C for 48 h. To determine the dry weight of epidermal and mesophyll cells per petal, we sampled each type of cells from three flowers at 0, 2, 4 and 6 days after anthesis.

Light microscopy observation and viability staining test

At each time point, a petal was taken from each of the three flowers, and a 2 × 5-mm section was cut from the central part of each petal. The sections were fixed in FAA solution [formalin, acetic acid, 80% ethanol, 1:1:8 (v/v)]. The samples were dehydrated in a series of graded ethanol solutions and embedded in Technovit 7100 (Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany). Sections (10 μm) were cut with a microtome and stained with toluidine blue dye. A light microscope (Olympus AX70, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for all histological observations. We randomly selected three areas (1-mm length) from each section and separately counted the unbroken epidermal and mesophyll cells. The experiments were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

For a viability staining test, we used Evans Blue dye (Wako, Osaka, Japan) bound to dead cells. We cut a 3 × 20-mm section from the central part of each petal at 0, 2, 4, and 8 days after anthesis. The sections were completely submerged in 0.1% (w/v) aqueous Evans Blue dye and incubated for 90 min at room temperature (25°C). They were then washed twice (30 s each) with distilled water at room temperature to remove unbound dye. To observe the epidermal and mesophyll tissues separately, the adaxial epidermal layer dragged away from each section with tweezers. The experiments were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

Protein content and total proteinase activity

Protein extraction and proteolytic activity assays followed the protocol described by Battelli et al. [3]. The Qubit Protein Assay kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to determine the soluble protein content. The proteolytic activity was assayed at pH 5.5 in 500-μL reaction mixtures (22.5 mM of acetate buffer (pH 5.5), 0.2% (w/v) azocasein, 2.5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and 20-μL extract [3]. Each mixture was incubated at 32°C for 16 h and the enzymatic reactions were stopped by the addition of 125 μL 50% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (w/v). Reaction mixtures were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min and absorbance at 330 nm was measured. These measurements were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

DNA degradation

Total DNA was extracted from each sample using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [25]. Each DNA sample (500 ng) was subjected to electrophoresis in a 3% (w/v) agarose gel, and gels were stained with GelRed (Biotium, Inc., USA). The experiments were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

Isolation of total RNA and synthesis of cDNA

For isolation of RNA, each sample (100 mg) was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground into powder in a 2-ml microtube. Total RNA was extracted from the flowers with an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) after RNase-free DNase І (Qiagen) treatment. Between 0.1 and 0.5 μg of the total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA with oligo-dT primer and random 6-mers using reverse transcriptase with a PrimeScript RT master mix kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Cloning of cDNA

Degenerate primers for amplification were designed on the basis of sequences corresponding to highly conserved peptide regions of SAG12-cystein proteinase and S1/P1-type nuclease. To clone VPE, KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase, and ubiquitin (UBQ), specific primers were designed using the cDNA sequences of LlVPE4, LlVPE5, LlCYP [10,26], and UBQ (AF116772) identified from L. longiflorum. cDNAs were synthesized with RNA extracted from petals on days 2 and 6. Amplified polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of appropriate length were subcloned into the pGEM-T-easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced with a Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). We obtained full-length composite cDNA (S1P1 type nuclease, SAG12, KDEL, VPE, and UBQ) by 3′- and 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Primers were designed using Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) on the basis of the resulting DNA sequences. RACE products were cloned into the pGEM-T-easy vector (Promega) and sequenced as described above. For further cloning of the full-length cDNAs, PCR was performed using gene-specific primers with the Prime STAR GXL DNA polymerase (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA isolation and synthesis of cDNA were performed as described above. The primers for real-time RT PCR were designed to target the 3′-untranslated region of target genes with Primer3 (S1 Table). PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq Π (Takara Bio) on a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System (TP600, Takara Bio). The thermal cycling conditions were 95°C for 10 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s. Data were normalized by the calculation of the transcript level ratios of four target genes and UBQ within the same sample. These measurements were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

Nitrogen analysis

Tissues were dried in an electric oven at 80°C for 24 h. For nitrogen (N) analysis, each dried sample was ground with a pestle and mortar. Determination of total N content followed the protocol described by Makino et al. [27]. Briefly, the dried ground materials were digested with H2SO4–H2O2 and total N content was determined with Nessler’s reagent [27]. These measurements were performed in triplicate with independent samples.

Results

Time course of flower senescence

Visible signs of senescence, e.g., color fading in petals, began to be observed on day 5 and were fully evident on day 6. The tips of petals (inner tepals) were wilted on day 7, and petals abscised on day 8 (Fig 1). The FW of whole petals did not show apparent changes until abscission (Fig 2A). Dry weight of whole petals decreased in two steps: in the early (from day 0 to 2) and late (from day 4 to 7) stages of the experiment (Fig 2B, p < 0.05, Tukey test).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Stages of Lilium cv. Yelloween flower lifespan from flower opening to senescing petals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. (A) Fresh weight and (B) dry weight of individual whole petals during flower development and senescence.

Means with different letters are significantly different (Tukey test, p < 0.05). Each data point represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g002

Dry weight began to decrease earlier in the mesophyll cells than in the epidermal cells (S1 Fig). The dry weight of the mesophyll significantly decreased in two steps: from days 0 to 2 and from days 4 to 6 (S1 Fig, p < 0.05, Tukey test). In contrast, the dry weight of the epidermal cells significantly increased from days 2 to 4 and decreased from days 4 to 6 (S1 Fig, p < 0.05, Tukey test).

Light microscopy observations, change in cell number, and viability test

Images of cross sections prepared from the middle parts of petals are shown in Fig 3. On day 0, both epidermal and mesophyll cells were well defined (Fig 3A, day 0). However, in the mesophyll layer, some mesophyll cells collapsed and lost their organization at day 2 (Fig 3A, black arrows, day 2). On day 4, relative to the day 0 section, the intercellular spaces were widened in the mesophyll layer, but disruption of the cells was not evident (Fig 3A, day 4). The epidermis remained intact on day 4 (Fig 3A, day 4). On days 6 and 7, disrupted mesophyll cells were observed once again (Fig 3A, black arrows, day 7), but cells belonging to the vascular strand remained intact (Fig 3A, white arrow, day 7). The epidermal cells were partially collapsed at day 7 (Fig 3A, gray arrow, day 7).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

(A) Cross sections of the middle part of the margin of Lilium cv. Yelloween petals. Black arrows, collapsed mesophyll cells (day 2 and 7); white arrow, vascular strand cells (day 7); gray arrow, partially disrupted epidermal cells (day 7). Bars, 250 μm. (B) Areas for counting the number of cells. A 2 × 5-mm section was cut from the central part of each petal. Three areas were randomly selected from each section (red square) and unbroken epidermal and mesophyll cells were counted separately. The length of areas was fixed (1 mm), whereas widths of areas changed owing to the change in petal thickness during development and senescence. (C) Changes in cell numbers in the epidermal and mesophyll layers. Means with different letters are significantly different (Tukey test, p < 0.05). Each data point represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 9).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g003

The unbroken epidermal and mesophyll cells were counted in a 1-mm length of areas of each section. The thickness of petals changed through development and senescence, as did the width of petal sections. Thus, the length (1 mm) of the areas was fixed, whereas their width changed (Fig 3B). The number of epidermal cells did not change throughout the experiment, whereas the number of mesophyll cells decreased significantly in two steps: in the early (from day 1 to 2) and late (from day 4 to 7) stages of the experiment (Fig 3C, p < 0.05, Tukey test). The number of mesophyll cells decreased by 22.8% within 3 days after anthesis (Fig 3C).

In the viability test, the epidermal sections were not evidently stained until day 8 (S2 Fig, black arrow, day 8). The mesophyll tissues were stained only in a small part of the section on day 0. On days 2 and 4, in the mesophyll tissues, the sections were widely stained, and the stained area increased from day 4 to 8 (S2 Fig).

Total proteinase activity, total protein content, and DNA degradation

In epidermal cells, the proteinase activity increased from day 4 (Fig 4A). In contrast, mesophyll cell samples showed high proteinase activity on day 1 and a second peak of activity on day 6 (Fig 4A).

thumbnail
Fig 4. (A) Total proteinase activity and (B) protein content in Lilium cv. Yelloween petals.

Each data point represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g004

The soluble protein content decreased in the late stage (from day 4 to 7) in the epidermal cell samples (Fig 4B), consistent with the change in proteinase activity in the epidermis (Fig 4A). In the mesophyll cell samples, the soluble protein content began to decrease from day 0 (Fig 4B). Soluble protein content of mesophyll cells decreased by 61.8% within 3 days after anthesis (Fig 4B).

In the epidermal cell samples, clear DNA degradation was observed on day 5 (Fig 5, left). In the mesophyll cell samples, a DNA laddering pattern was observed from day 2 (Fig 5, right) and gradually became marked during the development and senescence of flowers.

thumbnail
Fig 5. (A) DNA fragmentation at different stages of Lilium cv. Yelloween petal development from flower opening to senescence.

M: DNA ladder marker.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g005

Different expression patterns of PCD-associated genes

Three cysteine proteinase gene homologs, encoding SAG12, KDEL, and VPE, were isolated and designated as LoSAG12, LoCYP, and LoVPE, respectively (S3, S4 and S5 Figs).

The deduced amino acid sequence of LoSAG12 showed 55–68% identity with sequences of SAG12 cysteine proteinases obtained from petals of petunia (AY662996) and leaves of A. thaliana (AAC49135) and Nicotiana tabacum (AY881011). Catalytic residues Cys-140, His-277, Asn-298, and several other characteristic amino acids are conserved in LoSAG12 [2830] (S3 Fig).

The deduced amino acid sequence of LoCYP showed 70–93% identity with sequences of KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinases cloned from petals of L. longiflorum (HF968474), Hemerocallis (U12637, X74406), and Iris (AY504967). The LoCYP protein carries a KDEL motif at the C terminus (S4 Fig), which acts as an ER-retention/retrieval signal and identifies LoCYP as a member of the KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase family. The catalytic residues Cys-154, His-289, Asn- 310, and Gln-148 are conserved in LoCYP [3,28,29] (S4 Fig).

The deduced amino acid sequence of LoVPE showed 99% and 90% identity with the sequences of LlVPE4 and LlVPE5, respectively, which were obtained from L. longiflorum [26] (S6 Fig). In phylogenetic analysis, LoVPE grouped in a large cluster of vegetative VPEs (S6 Fig). The deduced amino acid sequence of LoVPE showed higher identity with sequences of Arabidopsis vegetative αVPE (D61393) and γVPE (BAA18924) than with sequences of seed-type βVPE (D61394) and δVPE (AF521661). The catalytic residues Cys-204 and His-162 [15,26], and the C-terminal GFSA motif are conserved in LoVPE [26] (S5 Fig).

A homolog of S1/P1 type nucleases (LoNUC) was also isolated. The deduced amino acid sequence of LoNUC showed 70%–78% identity with the sequences of S1/P1 type nuclease genes from Hemerocallis (AF082031), A. thaliana (NM_100991.2), and Zinnia elegans (AB003131) (S7 Fig). The active-site residues responsible for the binding of zinc atoms are conserved in LoNUC [21,31] (S7 Fig).

Three cysteine proteinase homologs (LoSAG12, LoCYP, LoVPE) showed expression patterns differing between the epidermal and mesophyll cells during senescence (Fig 6A–6C). In both the epidermal and mesophyll cell samples, LoSAG12 was upregulated in the senescent stage (Fig 6A). The peak transcript level of LoSAG12 was higher in the epidermal cells than that in the mesophyll cells on day 6 (Fig 6A). By contrast, the transcript levels of the KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase homolog (LoCYP) began to increase in mesophyll 2 days earlier than that in epidermis, and the transcripts peaked on day 4 (Fig 6B). In the epidermal cells, the peak of LoCYP transcripts appeared on day 6 (Fig 6B). Similar patterns were found in the epidermal and mesophyll cells in the levels of LoVPE homolog. The transcript levels of LoVPE increased on day 2 and decreased on day 4 (Fig 6C).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Transcripts of (A) LoSAG12, (B) LoCYP, (C) LoVPE, and (D) LoNUC homologs in petals of Lilium cv. Yelloween flowers.

Values for each homolog are relative to the expression level of ubiquitin. Each data point represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.g006

On day 0, the S1/P1 nuclease homolog (LoNUC) was detected in the mesophyll cells, whereas, in the epidermal cells, the transcript level of LoNUC was negligible. The transcript levels of LoNUC in the mesophyll cells began to increase on day 2, earlier than those in the epidermis (Fig 6D). The transcripts of LoNUC peaked on day 4 in the mesophyll cells, and on day 5 in the epidermal cells (Fig 6D). These peak levels of LoNUC transcripts were nearly identical in epidermal and mesophyll cells.

Nitrogen decrease during senescence

In the epidermal cells, the nitrogen content did not show a significant decrease throughout the experiment (Table 1). By contrast, in the mesophyll cells, the nitrogen content decreased significantly from day 4 to day 7 (Table 1, p < 0.01, Tukey test).

thumbnail
Table 1. Changes in nitrogen content of epidermal and mesophyll cell tissues per petal from flower opening to senescence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.t001

Discussion

In this study, we confirmed that in petals of cut lilies, PCD began earlier in the mesophyll than in the epidermis, and before visible signs of senescence were observed. In mesophyll cells, DNA laddering, decreases in dry weight, protein content, an increase in proteinase activity, and tissues stained with Evans Blue dye were observed within 3 days after anthesis, and 22.8% of the cells were lost. The proteinase activity showed a second peak on day 6 and the number of mesophyll cells decreased again from days 4 to 7. These biochemical and morphological results suggest that, in the mesophyll cells of Lilium cv. Yelloween petals, PCD progressed in steps: in the early (from day 1 to day 3) and late (from day 5 to day 7) stages of flower life. The first onset of PCD appeared to cause early senescence in the mesophyll cells before wilting in petals. Although the mesophyll contained mesophyll and vascular strand cells, the present biochemical results likely reflect PCD in mesophyll cells rather than in vascular strand cells, given that vascular strand cells remained intact on day 7, according to light microscopy observations. In the epidermal cells, PCD progressed in one step. Signs of PCD, such as DNA laddering and decreases in protein content, appeared from 5 days after anthesis.

PCD-associated genes expressed in the epidermal and mesophyll cells in lily petals showed spatial and temporal expression differences. The present results suggest that in the mesophyll cells of Lilium cv. Yelloween petals, LoCYP and LoNUC genes are involved in the early onset of PCD during the early stages of flower life, and may facilitate the transportation of degraded nutrients from mesophyll cells. In the epidermal cells, LoSAG12, LoCYP, and LoNUC genes contribute to the late onset of PCD during senescence.

Time course of PCD progression in epidermal and mesophyll cells

The results of our biochemical and morphological observations are consistent with those of previous studies showing that mesophyll cells begin to senesce earlier than epidermal cells in petals [2224]. We also found a step-like progression of PCD in the mesophyll cells, which is expected to affect the reduction of dry weight in whole petals. This weight decreased twice during senescence. Our results are similar to those for the proteinase activity in whole tepals of L. longiflorum [3]. Those levels increased slightly from bud development to full bloom and increased sharply in the tepal senescent stage [3]. The present procedure, investigating epidermal and mesophyll cells separately, allowed us to identify an early increase in proteinase activity only in the mesophyll and not in the epidermal cells. Although the epidermal and mesophyll cells were not distinguished, a previous study found that 50% of nuclei showed TUNEL-positive signs of DNA fragmentation in the blooming stage in L. longiflorum [3]. The previous and present biochemical results suggest that PCD occurs in some mesophyll cells but not in all cells simultaneously during the early stages of flower life. Five days after anthesis, signs of PCD were found in both epidermal and mesophyll cells. The late onset of PCD was temporally synchronized with the course of visible senescence. In petals of Lilium cv. Yelloween, the first visible sign of senescence was color fading in the petals [32]. In Lilium cv. Yelloween, the petals contain carotenoid pigments, which are abundant in epidermal cells (data not shown). The progression of PCD in epidermal cells may trigger a decrease of carotenoid content in petals and induce color fading in Lilium cv. Yelloween [32].

Different expression patterns of PCD-associated genes

The temporal expression pattern of LoSAG12 was consistent with that of petunia and I. nil SAG12, which were upregulated in the senescent stage of the flowers [6,9]. However, the spatial expression pattern of LoSAG12 differed from that of Arabidopsis and soybean SAG12 genes. LoSAG12 was actively expressed in epidermis rather than mesophyll cells, whereas Arabidopsis and soybean SAG12 genes were expressed in mesophyll and guard cells but not in epidermal cells [8]. The spatial expression patterns of SAG12 may differ between petals and leaves. Arabidopsis and soybean SAG12 genes were expressed in chloroplast-containing leaf cells [8] and, in this study, LoSAG12 was actively expressed in carotenoid-containing petal cells. These expression patterns imply that the SAG12 gene may be expressed in associated with the degradation of plastids during plant senescence. In Lilium cv. Yelloween, SAG 12 may degrade cellular components, including carotenoids in epidermal cells, possibly leading to color fading in petals.

From day 2, LoCYP was upregulated in the mesophyll cell samples. LoCYP may be involved in the early onset of PCD in mesophyll cells. The expression pattern of LoCYP was consistent with the results of previous studies with Hemerocallis and petunia flowers, in which KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase homologs were expressed from the early stages of flower life [6,12]. An immunoreactive study found that the levels of proactive and active KDEL enzyme increased during flower opening as well as senescence [10]. These results suggest that KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase is involved in early onset of PCD in mesophyll cells. The LoCYP gene was also upregulated in epidermal cells in the final stage of flower life, possibly leading to PCD in epidermal cells.

There were no differences in the LoVPE expression patterns between the epidermal and mesophyll cells, leaving the time lag of PCD progression between epidermal and mesophyll cells unexplained. The transcript level of LoVPE increased before petal wilting and decreased with age-related petal senescence. Our results are similar to those for I. nil petals, in which γVPE transcript levels increased before petal wilting and decreased in the senescent stage [18]. In the mesophyll cells, the total proteinase activity was high at day 0, prompting further studies to clarify the contributions of proteinases other than SAG12, KDEL, and VPE cysteine proteinases. Other types of cysteine proteinase, or aspartic, serine, and metalloproteinases, may contribute to proteinase activities in mesophyll cells.

On day 2, DNA degradation was observed, and expression of the S1/P1 nuclease homolog (LoNUC) was upregulated only in the mesophyll cells and not in the epidermal cells. In Hemerocallis, expression of the S1/P1 nuclease (DSA6) homolog began to increase before flower opening [19]. These results suggest that the S1/P1 type nuclease is involved in early PCD progression in mesophyll cells and contributes to the time lag of PCD between epidermal and mesophyll cells.

Contributions to nitrogen remobilization

Dry weight decreased in mesophyll cells during senescence, suggesting that degenerated cellular components may be remobilized from senescent mesophyll cells. Although protein content decreased markedly during the early stage of senescence, nitrogen content decreased significantly during the later stage of senescence in mesophyll cells. Thus, nitrogenous compounds derived from the partial degradation of proteins appear to be remobilized from mesophyll cells during the later stage of senescence. In the epidermal cells, the nitrogen content did not decrease, whereas proteins and nucleic acids were degraded at the late stage of senescence. In unpollinated, detached flowers, nutrient remobilization may be reduced from that in flowers that are still attached to the plant during senescence [1]. An investigation using attached flowers would clarify the role of PCD in nutrient remobilization in epidermal and mesophyll cells.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a time lag of PCD progression between mesophyll and epidermal cells during flower life in petals of Lilium cv. Yelloween. The early onset of PCD only occurred in some mesophyll cells, and 22.8% of the mesophyll cells were lost from day 0 to day 3 after anthesis. Early expression of KDEL-type cysteine proteinase (LoCYP) and S1/P1 nuclease (LoNUC) genes may be involved in the early onset of PCD in mesophyll cells. The early onset of PCD in mesophyll cells appears to play an important role in nutrient remobilization from senescent petals to other plant parts. Five days after anthesis, signs of the late onset of PCD were observed in the mesophyll cells. Beginning on day 5, PCD rapidly progressed in the epidermis. The results of gene expression analysis suggest that LoCYP, LoNUC, and SAG12 cysteine proteinase gene LoSAG12 are involved in the late onset of PCD in epidermal cells. The contributions of LoSAG12 appeared to be higher in epidermal cells than in mesophyll cells.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Changes in dry weight of epidermal and mesophyll cells per petal.

Central bundles and the bottom part of each petal were excluded from samples. Means with different letters are significantly different (Tukey test, p < 0.05). Each data point represents the mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Staining sections with Evans Blue dye.

Black arrows, partially stained epidermal section. Bars, 10 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of SAG12 cysteine proteinase enzymes.

The sequences of LoSAG12 are compared with the sequences of SAG12 (In33) from I. nil (accession AB267829), CP1 from N. tabacum (accession AY881011), A. thaliana (accession AAC49135), and BnSAG12-1 from Brassica napus (accession AAD53011). The ERFNIN motif within the prosequence, amino acids belonging to the catalytic triad (Cys140- His277- Asn298), and other amino acids important for catalysis (Phe267, Trp300, Trp304, Gln134) are shown in red. Cysteine residues involved in disulfide bridges are shown in blue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of KDEL-tailed cysteine proteinase enzymes.

The sequences of LoCYP are compared with the sequences of CEP3 from A. thaliana (accession NP_566901), CP2 from N. tabacum (accession AY881010), and CYP from L. longiflorum (accession HF968474). The ERFNIN motif within the prosequence, amino acids belonging to the catalytic triad (Cys154-His289- Asn310), and another amino acid (Gln148) important for catalysis are in red. Cysteine residues involved in disulfide bridges are shown in blue and the C-terminal KDEL is shown in green.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of vacuolar processing enzyme (VPE) cysteine proteinase enzymes.

The sequences of LoVPE are compared with the sequences of αVPE (accession D61393), βVPE (accession D61394), γVPE (accession BAA18924) and δVPE (accession AF521661) from A.thaliana. Amino acids belonging to the catalytic pocket (Cys-204 and His-162) are shown in red. The C-terminal GFSA motif is shown in green.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Phylogenetic analysis of vacuolar processing enzymes (VPEs).

VPEs cloned from A. thaliana (At), N. tabacum (Nt), Hordeum vulgare, (Hv) L. longiflorum (Ll), I. nil (In), Dianthus caryophyllus (Dc), Narcissus pseudonarcissus (Np), and Theobroma cacao (Tc). LoVPE is boxed. Sequence alignment was performed with ClustalW2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of S1/P1 type nuclease enzymes.

The sequences of LoNUC are compared with those of SA6 from Hemerocallis (accession AF082031), BFN1 from A. thaliana (accession NM_100991.2), ZEN1 from Zinnia elegans (accession AB003131), S1 from Aspergillus oryzae (accession D45902), and P1 Penicillium chrysogenum (accession XM_002557445). The active site residues involved in the binding of zinc atoms are shown in red. Cysteine residues involved in disulfide bridges are shown in blue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s007

(TIF)

S1 Table. Sequences of primers used in real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.s008

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Ayuko Ushio for technical support in nutrient analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HM KI. Performed the experiments: HM TN KS. Analyzed the data: HM TN KS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HM TN KS. Wrote the paper: HM KI.

References

  1. 1. Jones ML. Mineral nutrient remobilization during corolla senescence in ethylene-sensitive and -insensitive flowers, AoB Plants. 2013; 5: plt023. Available: http://aobpla.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/plt023.full. pmid:23671789
  2. 2. van Doon WG, Woltering EJ. 2008. Physiology and molecular biology of petal senescence. J Exp Bot. 2008;59: 453–480. pmid:18310084
  3. 3. Battelli R, Lombardi L, Rogers H, Picciarelli P, Lorenzi R, Ceccarelli N. Changes in ultrastructure, protease and caspase-like activities during flower senescence in Lilium longiflorum. Plant Sci. 2011;180: 716–725. pmid:21421423
  4. 4. Pak C, van Doorn WG. Delay of Iris flower senescence by protease inhibitors. New Phytol. 2005;165: 473–480. pmid:15720658
  5. 5. Wagstaff C, Leverentz MK, Griffiths G, Thomas B, Chanasut U, Stead AD, et al. Cysteine protease gene expression and proteolytic activity during senescence of Alstroemeria petals. J Exp Bot. 2002;56: 2733–2744.
  6. 6. Jones ML, Chaffin GS, Eason JR, Clark DG. Ethylene-sensitivity regulates proteolytic activity and cysteine protease gene expression in petunia corollas. J Exp Bot. 2005;56: 2733–2744. pmid:16131506
  7. 7. Lohman KN, Gan S, John MC, Amasino RM. Molecular analysis of natural leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant. 1994;92: 322–328.
  8. 8. Otegui MS, Noh YS, Martínez DE, Vila Petroff MG, Staehelin LA, Amasino RM, et al. Senescence-associated vacuoles with intense proteolytic activity develop in leaves of Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant J. 2005;41: 831–844. pmid:15743448
  9. 9. Yamada T, Ichimura K, Kanekatsu M, van Doorn WG. Gene expression in opening and senescing petals of morning glory (Ipomoea nil) flowers. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;226: 1195–205.
  10. 10. Battelli R, Lombardi L, Picciarelli P, Lorenzi R, Frigerio L, Rogers HJ. Expression and localisation of a senescence-associated KDEL-cysteine. Plant Sci. 2014;214: 38–46. pmid:24268162
  11. 11. Helm M, Schmid M, Hierl G, Terneus K, Tan L, Lottspeich F, et al. KDEL-tailed cysteine endopeptidases involved in programmed cell death, intercalation of new cells, and dismantling of extension scaffolds. Am J Bot. 2008;95: 1049–1062. pmid:21632425
  12. 12. Valpuesta V, Lange NE, Guerrero C, Reid MS. Upregulation of a cysteine protease accompanies the ethylene-insensitive senescence of daylily (Hemerocallis) flowers. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;28: 575–582. pmid:7632925
  13. 13. Pop C, Salvesen GS. Human caspases activation, specificity, and regulation. Journal Biol Chem. 2009;284: 21777–21781.
  14. 14. Gruis DF, Selinger DA, Curran JM, Jung R. Redundant proteolytic mechanisms process seed storage proteins in the absence of seed-type members of the vacuole processing enzyme family of cysteine proteases. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 2863–2882. pmid:12417707
  15. 15. Hara-Nishimura I, kinoshita T, Hiraiwa N, Nishimura M. Vacuolar processing enzymes in protein-storage vacuoles and lytic vacuoles. J Plant Physiol. 1998;152: 668–674.
  16. 16. Rojo E, Martín R, Carter C, Zouhar J, Pan S, Plotnikova J, et al. VPEγ exhibits a caspase-like activity that contributes to defense against pathogens. Curr Biol. 2004;14: 1897–1906. pmid:15530390
  17. 17. Hoeberichts FA, van Doorn WG, Vorst O, Hall RD, van Wordragen MF. Sucrose prevents regulation of senescence-associated genes in carnation. J Ex Bot. 2007;58: 2873–2885.
  18. 18. Yamada T, Ichimura K, Kanekatsu M, van Doorn WG. Homologs of genes associated with programmed cell death in animal cells are differentially expressed during senescence of Ipomoea nil petals. Plant cell physiol. 2009;50: 610–625. pmid:19182226
  19. 19. Panavas T, Pikula A, Reid PD, Rubinstein B, Walker EL. Identification of senescence-associated genes from daylily petals. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40: 237–248. pmid:10412903
  20. 20. Hunter DA, Steele BC, Reid MS. Identification of genes associated with perianth senescence in Daffodil. (Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. 'Dutch Master'). Plant Sci. 2002;163, 13–21.
  21. 21. Lesniewicz K, Karlowski WM, Pienkowska JR, Krzywkowski P, Poreba E. The plant S1-like nuclease family has evolved a highly diverse range of catalytic capabilities. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54: 1064–1078. pmid:23620482
  22. 22. Mochizuki-Kawai H, Shibuya K, Ichimura K. Programmed cell death begins earlier in the mesophyll cells of tulip petals than in the epidermal cells, Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013;79: 9–12.
  23. 23. van Doorn WG, Balk PA, van Houwelingen AM, Hoeberichts FA, Hall RD, Vorst O, et al. Gene expression during anthesis and senescence in Iris flowers. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;53: 845–863. pmid:15082930
  24. 24. Wagstaff C, Malcolm P, Rafiq A, Leverentz M, Griffiths G, Thomas B, et al. Programmed cell death (PCD) processes begin extremely early in Alstroemeria petal senescence. New Phytol. 2003;160: 49–59.
  25. 25. Yamada T, Kanekatsu Y, Manabe T, Kasumi M, Marubashi W. Suppressive effect of trehalose on apoptotic cell death leading to petal senescence in ethylene-insensitive flowers of gladiolus. Plant Sci. 2003;164: 213–221.
  26. 26. Battelli R. Physiological and molecular aspects of flower senescence in Lilium Longiflorum. PhD dissertation. University of Pisa. 2010.
  27. 27. Makino A, Sato T, Nakano H, Mae T. Leaf photosynthesis, plant growth and nitrogen allocation in rice under different irradiances. Planta. 1997;203: 390–398.
  28. 28. Beyene G, Foyer CH, Kunert KJ. Two new cysteine proteinases with specific expression patterns in mature and senescent tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaves. J Exp Bot. 2006;57: 1431–1443. pmid:16551685
  29. 29. Richau KH, Kaschani F, Verdoes M, Pansuriya TC, Niessen S, Stüber K, et al. Subclassification and biochemical analysis of plant papain-like cysteine proteases displays subfamily-specific characteristics. Plant Physiol. 2012;158: 1583–1599. pmid:22371507
  30. 30. Wan L, Xia Q, Qiu X, Selvaraj G. Early stages of seed development in Brassica napus, a seed coat-specific cysteine proteinase associated with programmed cell death of the inner integument. Plant J. 2002;30: 1–10. pmid:11967088
  31. 31. Pérez-Amador MA, Abler ML, De Rocher EJ, Thompson DM, van Hoof A, LeBrasseur ND, et al. Identification of BFN1, a bifunctional nuclease induced during leaf and stem senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000;122: 169–180. pmid:10631260
  32. 32. Mochizuki-Kawai H, Kishimoto S, Wada Y, Masuda T, Ichimura K. Petal saturation affects visible flower senescence in cut lilies, J Japan Soc Hort Sci. 2012;81: 350–356.