Transcriptional Profile of Bacillus subtilis sigF-Mutant during Vegetative Growth

Wout Overkamp; Oscar P. Kuipers

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141553

Abstract

Sigma factor F is the first forespore specific transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis and controls genes required for the early stages of prespore development. The role of sigF is well studied under conditions that induce sporulation. Here, the impact of sigF disruption on the transcriptome of exponentially growing cultures is studied by micro-array analysis. Under these conditions that typically don’t induce sporulation, the transcriptome showed minor signs of sporulation initiation. The number of genes differentially expressed and the magnitude of expression were, as expected, quite small in comparison with sporulation conditions. The genes mildly down-regulated were mostly involved in anabolism and the genes mildly up-regulated, in particular fatty acid degradation genes, were mostly involved in catabolism. This is probably related to the arrest at sporulation stage II occurring in the sigF mutant, because continuation of growth from the formed disporic sporangia may require additional energy. The obtained knowledge is relevant for various experiments, such as industrial fermentation, prolonged experimental evolution or zero-growth studies, where sporulation is an undesirable trait that should be avoided, e.g by a sigF mutation.

Citation: Overkamp W, Kuipers OP (2015) Transcriptional Profile of Bacillus subtilis sigF-Mutant during Vegetative Growth. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0141553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553

Editor: Raymond Schuch, ContraFect Corporation, UNITED STATES

Received: February 11, 2015; Accepted: October 9, 2015; Published: October 27, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Overkamp, Kuipers. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: The DNA micro-array data from this study are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE64918).

Funding: This work was supported by the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation which is part of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative / Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO); http://www.kluyvercentre.nl/ to WO. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

During conditions of nutrient starvation Bacillus subtilis is able to form dormant endospores, which can survive exposure to high temperatures, ultraviolet radiation, chemical solvents and other extreme conditions [1]. Endospore formation happens through asymmetric cell division, followed by engulfment of the smaller forespore by the larger mother cell. Development of the forespore into a spore is facilitated by the mother cell, which upon completion lyses and releases the spore (For reviews see [2–4].

The differentiation process is initiated by DNA-binding protein Spo0A, which in turn triggers programs of gene expression specific for the forespore and mother cell. Spo0A is a crucial transcriptional regulator with several hundred genes directly [5] and indirectly under its control [6]. It is activated by phosphorylation, which is governed by the phosphorelay [7]. The phosphorelay integrates environmental and intracellular signals to interpret whether a cell should initiate sporulation or not, and thus functions as a complex regulatory system [8].

The initial stages of forespore and mother cell development are governed by RNA polymerase sigma factors σ^F and σ^E, respectively. Their expression is controlled by Spo0A~P [2,9,10] and both are produced before formation of the asymmetric septum and remain inactive until completion of the septum [11]. The first forespore specific transcription factor σ^F controls genes required for the early stages of prespore development and is required for activation of σ^E [2,9,10]. Additionally, it directs transcription of the gene encoding σ^G, which replaces σ^F in later stages of prespore development. The successive activation of specific sigma-factors ensures that the forespore and mother-cell-specific programs of gene expression are kept in pace with the morphogenesis. The gene sigF is part of the three-cistron spoIIA operon and is also named spoIIAC [12]. The other members spoIIAA and spoIIAB are involved in regulation of σ^F activity [9,13–15].

During circumstances where sporulation is undesirable, such as with industrial fermentations, evolution experiments and particular chemostat experiments, the use of sporulation-deficient strains can be a solution. In Bacillus subtilis a disruption of sigF prevents continuation of sporulation at stage II [16,17]. Therefore, it is relevant to assess the effect of a sigF mutation on the general metabolism and regulatory circuitry during vegetative growth.

The phenotype and genotype of B. subtilis carrying a disruption in sigF have previously been characterized under sporulation-inducing conditions [6,18–20]. Cells lacking σF are unable to complete differentiation into a forespore and instead form an additional polar septum at the opposite cell pole [17,21]. When excess of nutrients is available, these disporic sporangias are able to reinitiate growth from both polar compartments [18].

Transcriptome studies of sigF mutant strains that were grown under sporulation conditions and studies where sigF was artificially induced, revealed SigF-dependent genes and the essential role of sigF in the sporulation process [6,19,20]. Although the sigF mutation will not affect micro-array transcript ratios in typical experiments that analyze the response of an isogenic strain to varying conditions, it is of interest to assess the impact of the sigF mutation against a wild-type background under vegetative conditions.

Here we study the impact of the sigF disruption on the transcriptome of exponentially growing cultures. The transcriptome of a sigF mutant is compared to that of the wild-type strain using micro-array analysis. We find that under these non-sporulation-inducing conditions the transcriptome showed minor signs of sporulation initiation, and that the number of differentially expressed genes and the magnitude of expression were quite small in comparison with those under sporulation conditions. The down-regulated genes are mostly involved in anabolism and the up-regulated genes are mostly involved in catabolism, in particular fatty acid degradation genes. This probably reflects the arrest at sporulation stage II of the sigF mutant, redistributing energy over the polar compartments to resume normal growth.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, media and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Bacillus subtilis strain sigF::spc was obtained by a double recombination event of plasmid pUC18sigF::spc into the chromosomal sigF region of B. subtilis 168 trpC2. Correct integration into the chromosome was checked by PCR and DNA sequencing.

Download:

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study^{^a}.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.t001

To construct plasmid pUC18sigF::spc, carrying a spectinomycin resistance cassette flanked by the 5`and 3`ends of sigF, a PCR with the primers sigF-Fw and sigF-R was performed to amplify the sigF gene region, using chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis 168 as template. The PCR fragment and pUC18 were digested with the restriction enzyme HincII and ligated into the corresponding site in pUC18, yielding the plasmid pUC18sigF. Subsequently, to exchange the majority of the sigF gene with a spectinomycin resistance cassette, leaving only the flanking regions, a round PCR was performed on pUC18sigF using the primers sigF-SalI-Fw and sigF-XhoI-R. The PCR fragment and the plasmid pDG1727, harbouring the spectinomycin resistance cassette, were both digested with XhoI and SalI. A ligation was then performed on the PCR fragment and the gel-isolated spectinomycin resistance cassette to yield the plasmid pUC18sigF::spc. Oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table 2.

Download:

Table 2. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.t002

B. subtilis was grown at 37°C on Trypton Yeast-extract (TY) medium (Sambrook et al. 1989) solidified with 1.5% (wt/vol) agar, or in TY or Difco Sporulation Medium (DSM) [25] with shaking at 200 rpm (see below). Escherichia coli DH5α was used as host for cloning and grown in TY medium at 37°C with shaking or on TY medium solidified with 1.5% (wt/vol) agar. When required, the growth media were supplemented with the following antibiotics: 100 μg ml⁻¹ ampicillin (amp) or 150 μg ml⁻¹ erythromycin (em) for E. coli, 100 μg ml⁻¹ spectinomycin (spc) for B. subtilis.

Recombinant DNA techniques and oligonucleotides

DNA purification, restriction, ligation, agarose gel electrophoresis and transformation of E. coli was performed as described before [26]. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Biolegio (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). Enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA) and Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania) and used as prescribed by the manufacturer. B. subtilis was transformed as described previously [27].

Determination of sporulation frequencies

For sporulation conditions B. subtilis 168 and sigF::spc were inoculated into DSM and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 24 h. For vegetative conditions B. subtilis 168 and sigF::spc were inoculated into TY and grown to OD₆₀₀ of 1.5. Cultures were diluted 1/10 into 1.5 ml of spizizen salts [28] and 100 μl chloroform was added. The cell suspensions were mixed and incubated for 30 min at 80°C. Serial dilutions of treated and untreated cultures were plated on TY solidified with 1.5% (wt/vol) agar for CFU counting.

Growth and preparation of cells for RNA isolation

Cultures were grown in absence of antibiotics in 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks by inoculation of 25 ml medium with cells at OD₆₀₀ 0.05. For vegetative conditions, cells were grown in TY medium, subsequently diluted and regrown to synchronize cultures and to minimize carryover of sporulating cells, and finally samples for RNA isolation were taken at OD₆₀₀ 1.5. For sporulation conditions cells were grown in DSM medium and samples for RNA isolation were taken 2 hours after the transition point between the exponential and stationary growth phase. Cell pellets were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until RNA isolation.

DNA microarray analysis

Design and production of DNA microarrays was done according to standardized lab protocols described previously [29].

For RNA isolation, cell culture samples were quickly centrifuged for 2 min at 6,000 × g, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were broken using 500 mg of glass beads, 500 μl of phenol-chloroform, 30 μl of 3 M sodium acetate, and 15 μl of 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate. RNAs were isolated using the High Pure RNA isolation kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a quality check of the isolated RNA using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 with RNA 6000 LabChips (Agilent Technologies, the Netherlands), 20 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and incorporation of aminoallyl-dUTP using SuperscriptIII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Europe BV, the Netherlands). Subsequently, the cDNA was labeled with Cy3- or Cy5-monoreactive dye (Amersham Biosciences) and hybridized to oligonucleotide microarrays as described before [29,30]. Slides were scanned using a confocal laser scanner (GenePix Autoloader AL4200, Molecular Devices Ltd., Sunnyvale, USA). Fluorescent signal intensity data were quantified using ArrayPro (Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, Md., USA) with a local corners background correction. The obtained expression levels were subjected to a t-test using CyberT software [31] after the values were processed and normalized (Lowess method) using microPreP [32]. For both vegetative- and sporulation conditions the experimental setup included two biological replicates with a dye swap for one of the replicates, resulting in three slides. In total six measurements per gene were performed, since two duplicate spots for all genes were present on each slide. Genes having a fold change higher then 2 and a Bayes p-value lower than 0.05 were considered to be expressed differentially. The gene lists selected with these criteria are presented in S1 and S2 Tables. The software package FIVA (Functional Information Viewer and Analyzer; [33] was used to identify overrepresented functional categories in differentially expressed genes. Sources used by this software include: metabolic pathways from Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; [34]), categories from Gene Ontology (GO; [35]) and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG; [36]) and regulons from Database of Transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis (DBTBS; [37]). DNA microarray data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO; http://ncbi.nlm.nih/gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE64918.

Results & Discussion

Construction of B. subtilis sigF mutant strain

An asporogenous strain was constructed by replacing bp 2443565 to 2444182 of the B. subtilis 168 chromosome [22] with a spectinomycin resistance cassette. This area corresponds to majority of the gene sigF. To confirm deficiency in spore formation, the sigF strain and wild-type strain were allowed to sporulate in Difco Sporulation Medium (DSM) and were analyzed for the presence of heat- and chloroform- resistant spores by counting Colony Forming Units (CFU). Sporulation frequency of the sigF mutant strain was determined to be equal or less than 0.0001%, compared to 14% of the wild-type strain. These numbers confirm that the sigF mutant strain is unable to form spores.

Initiation of sporulation cascade hampered in sigF deletion strain

To confirm that sporulation genes were not transcribed in the sigF mutant strain, its transcriptome profile was compared with the wild-type strain under sporulation conditions. A total number of 958 genes, of which 758 down-regulated and 200 up-regulated, were differentially expressed in the sigF mutant strain versus the wild-type strain. The majority of the down-regulated genes have a function in -or related to- sporulation (S1 and S2 Tables), as is described in various other studies [6,19,20]. As expected, functional analysis with the FIVA software tool confirms that sporulation is the main functional group affected by the sigF mutation (S1 Fig).

Genes directly activated by SigF, such as rsfA, sigG, gpr and spoIIQ, as well as genes transcribed by other sigma factors later in the sporulation process are clearly expressed to a lesser extent in the sigF mutant strain. In contrast, for genes that are transcribed earlier in the sporulation cascade than sigF, such as spoIIE, spoIIGA, sigE (spoIIGB), and sigH (spo0H), the transcript ratios are equal between mutant and wild-type strain. The sigF mutation thus prevents completion of sporulation, but still allows for determination whether sporulation is initiated by monitoring of genes upstream of sigF.

Transcriptional profile under non-sporulation conditions

The role of SigF in vegetative growth was examined by comparing the transcriptional profiles of B. subtilis sigF::spc cells with its isogenic wild-type strain. Samples for DNA-microarray analysis were collected in the mid-exponential phase. Previously it has been reported that 0.4% of the cells form spores during exponential growth in casein hydrolysate medium [38]. In contrast, the presence of matured spores in our exponentially growing culture of the wild-type strain is highly unlikely, since a sporulation CFU count of vegetative growing cultures showed that the sporulation frequency is equal or less than 0.001% at this time point for both wild-type and sigF mutant strain. Notably, such a sporulation assay requires chloroform treatment that kills everything except matured spores and even cells that have initiated but did not complete spore formation will not survive. Therefore, the fraction of the culture that has initiated the sporulation process might actually be larger than observed.

The sigF regulon is well-studied and previous studies have shown that artificial induction of sigF under exponential conditions results in a similar sporulation-specific transcriptome response as occurs during sporulation initiation triggered by environmental cues [19,20]. In our experiment, the majority of the differentially expressed genes under vegetative conditions are not known to be sigF-regulated or to be sporulation-specific, indicating a more general response.

A total of 117 genes were differentially expressed in the sigF mutant strain versus the wild-type strain (for a top list see Table 3). The number of down-regulated and up-regulated genes was 68 and 49, respectively (S3 and S4 Tables). 35 of these genes were also differentially expressed in the sporulation-condition, among which 8 are listed to be involved with sporulation [39,40]. Thus, the difference in transcript profiles between the mutant and wild-type strain is caused only to a small extent by regulation directly related to sporulation.

Download:

Table 3. Toplist of genes differentially expressed in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under vegetative conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.t003

Under vegetative conditions the most extreme fold changes were -4.33 and 11.8, in contrast to the much higher expression ratios under sporulation-conditions that ranged from -385 to 10. The rest of the expression ratios under vegetative conditions was just under and above the set threshold of -2 and 2, respectively. Although the transcript ratios determined in these microarray experiments do not give information about absolute transcript numbers, in comparison with the observed fold changes under sporulation conditions the expression ratios under vegetative conditions are of a substantially lower magnitude. In addition to the fact that the number of differentially expressed genes is almost ten-fold lower than under sporulation conditions, this suggests that the sigF mutation does not have a profound effect under vegetative conditions. This is not unexpected since SigF is known as a sporulation-specific sigma factor. Among the down-regulated genes, the highest expression change occurred for yosX (-4.33; Table 3). The expression change of other genes ranged from -3.61 to -2 fold change. The sigF operon and some sporulation genes regulated by SigF, such as spoIIQ, were down-regulated which indicates that sporulation probably was initiated to a small extent in the wild-type strain. The majority of the down-regulated genes were associated with anabolism, for example, the ilv and leu genes involved in branched-chain amino acid synthesis [41] and the pur genes involved in synthesis of purines [42]. These genes are repressed in the presence of the products they synthesize [42,43]. The difference in relative transcript levels between the sigF mutant strain and the wild-type strain, might suggest that higher levels of these compounds are present in the sigF mutant culture. Similar to the down-regulated genes, the expression change of most up-regulated genes lies just above the cut-off of 2-fold. Many genes with a fold change higher than that are involved with fatty acid metabolism (acdA, etfB, fadAEFHN, lcfB). The highest up-regulated gene is yxeD (11.8 fold) whose function is unknown [20,40]. BLAST searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) resulted in purely hypothetical proteins. In general the up-regulated genes are involved in catabolism. Functional analysis with FIVA shows that fatty acid metabolism—and in particular, degradation—is overrepresented among the genes with changed expression (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. FIVA analysis of B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc gene expression under vegetative conditions.

Genes from one DNA microarray dataset (sigF mutant strain compared to wild-type strain during exponential growth) were partitioned into up- and down-regulated clusters. The size of each cluster is displayed in blue underneath the cluster name. Numbers in each rectangle represent absolute values of occurrences. The significance of occurrences is visualized in a colour gradient that is displayed at the bottom of the plot. The description of each category is placed at the right. Multiple testing correction results are visualized using five different symbols to distinguish between the individual corrections. The number of symbols placed in each rectangle corresponds to the number of multiple testing corrections after which the annotation is found significant. This figure legend is cited from [33].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.g001

Some of the fatty acid degradation genes that were up-regulated in the sigF mutant strain under vegetative conditions were up-regulated under sporulation conditions, too. This suggests that their regulation might be linked to sporulation- or sigF. It is known that upon sporulation the operon fadAEN, belonging to the FadR regulon, can be induced by Sdp (sporulation delay protein) [44]. However, the sdpABC operon was down-regulated in the sigF mutant strain and thus not likely to be involved in the induction of the fatty acid degradation genes in this case. In our case, not only fadAEN, but the complete FadR regulon was up-regulated under vegetative conditions. This regulon is subject to carbon catabolite repression [45] and induced by long-chain fatty acids [46]. Therefore it is more likely that one of these factors play a role in the observed up-regulation of fatty acid degradation genes under vegetative conditions. On the other hand, no other genes under carbon catabolite repression were induced under exponential conditions, making a role for CCR relief in the induction of the FadR regulon unlikely. The knowledge that the sigF mutant and wild-type strain were grown in glucose-free TY medium and were harvested at the same OD and time-point, diminishes the potential role of CCR relief in FadR regulon induction even more. Repression by FadR is antagonized by long-chain acyl Coa’s, in particular derivatives of 12-metyltetradecanoic and 13-metyltetradecanoic acids (anteisoC15:0 and isoC15:0 branched-chain fatty acids) [46], which are the most abundant fatty acids in the cell [47]. As suggested previously by Koburger et al. [48], cell lysis and membrane turnover might provide branched chained fatty acids synthesized in growing cells, thereby inducing the FadR regulon. The phenotype of the sigF mutant strain potentially leads to increased lysis in comparison to the wild-type strain. Cells that have initiated sporulation, but lack a functional sigF gene are unable to complete forespore differentiation at stage II of the sporulation process and instead form an additional polar septum at the opposite pole [17]. As described by Dworkin et al. [18], these disporic sporangias are able to reinitiate growth from both polar compartments when excess of nutrients is available. During this process the mother cell lyses and possibly releases cell components including long chain fatty acids into the environment. Thus, if some cells initiate sporulation under vegetative conditions the arrest at stage II of the sporulation process could be the cause of the observed transcriptome differences. Occasional observation of disporic sporangia under the microscope (≤0.1%) in samples from vegetative growing cultures supports this hypothesis.

Considering this, the observed transcriptome changes in this study are more likely an effect of cellular and physiological conditions resulting from arrest at sporulation stage II rather than a direct effect of gene regulation by SigF. The exact cause of the transcriptome change in the sigF mutant strain needs to be deciphered by further experimental work, including determining whether there is lysis or outgrowth of disporic sporangia occurs, and whether fatty acid concentrations become high enough to induce the FadR regulon.

Concluding remarks

In this study a transcriptomic comparison of a B. subtilis sigF deletion strain to a wild-type strain is performed during vegetative growth. In agreement with the fact that σF is a sporulation-specific sigma factor, a relative small amount of genes are found to be differentially expressed under non-sporulation conditions. Although some up-regulation of genes involved in catabolism—most notably fatty acid degradation genes—and some down-regulation of genes involved in anabolism was observed, this study shows that the sigF mutation has a minor effect on the transcriptome under vegetative conditions. The changes possibly reflect metabolic effects caused by minor lysis of cells that have initiated sporulation, and occasional outgrowth of disporic sporangia.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. FIVA analysis of B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc gene expression under sporulation conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Top 200 genes down-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under sporulation conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Top 200 genes up-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under sporulation conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Total genes down-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under non-sporulation conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.s004

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Total genes up-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under non-sporulation conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141553.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Anne de Jong for valuable help with micro-array analysis and Siger Holsappel for performing the sporulation assay.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OPK WO. Performed the experiments: WO. Analyzed the data: WO OPK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: OPK. Wrote the paper: WO OPK.

References

1. Nicholson WL, Munakata N, Horneck G, Melosh HJ, Setlow P. Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2000;64: 548–572. pmid:10974126
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Errington J. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1: 117–126. pmid:15035041
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36: 131–148. pmid:22091839
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Piggot PJ, Losick R. Sporulation genes and intercompartmental regulation. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and Its Closest Relative: From Genes to Cells. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2002. pp. 483–518.
5. Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Liu JS, et al. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50: 1683–1701. pmid:14651647
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Fawcett P, Eichenberger P, Losick R, Youngman P. The transcriptional profile of early to middle sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97: 8063–8068. pmid:10869437
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Burbulys D, Trach KA, Hoch JA. Initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell. 1991;64: 545–552. pmid:1846779
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Ireton K, Rudner DZ, Siranosian KJ, Grossman AD. Integration of multiple developmental signals in Bacillus subtilis through the Spo0A transcription factor. Genes Dev. 1993;7: 283–294. pmid:8436298
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Hilbert DW, Piggot PJ. Compartmentalization of Gene Expression during Bacillus subtilis Spore Formation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68: 234–262. pmid:15187183
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Stragier P, Losick R. Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu Rev Genet. 1996;30: 297–241. pmid:8982457
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Margolis P, Driks A, Losick R. Establishment of cell type by compartmentalized activation of a transcription factor. Science. 1991;254: 562–565. pmid:1948031
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Fort P, Piggot PJ. Nucleotide sequence of sporulation locus spoIIA in Bacillus subtilis. J Gen Microbiol. 1984;130: 2147–2153. pmid:6088674
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Duncan L, Losick R. SpoIIAB is an anti-sigma factor that binds to and inhibits transcription by regulatory protein sigma F from Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90: 2325–2329. pmid:8460142
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Duncan L, Alper S, Losick R. SpoIIAA governs the release of the cell-type specific transcription factor sigma F from its anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB. J Mol Biol. 1996;260: 147–164. pmid:8764397
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Schmidt R, Margolis P, Duncan L, Coppolecchia R, Moran CP Jr, Losick R. Control of developmental transcription factor sigma F by sporulation regulatory proteins SpoIIAA and SpoIIAB in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87: 9221–9225. pmid:2123551
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Illing N, Errington J. Genetic regulation of morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis: roles of sigma E and sigma F in prespore engulfment. J Bacteriol. 1991;173: 3159–3169. pmid:1902463
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Setlow B, Magill N, Febbroriello P, Nakhimovsky L, Koppel DE, Setlow P. Condensation of the forespore nucleoid early in sporulation of Bacillus species. J Bacteriol. 1991;173: 6270–6278. pmid:1917859
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Dworkin J, Losick R. Developmental Commitment in a Bacterium. Cell. 2005;121: 401–409. pmid:15882622
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Steil L, Serrano M, Henriques AO, Völker U. Genome-wide analysis of temporally regulated and compartment-specific gene expression in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Read Engl. 2005;151: 399–420.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Wang ST, Setlow B, Conlon EM, Lyon JL, Imamura D, Sato T, et al. The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol. 2006;358: 16–37. pmid:16497325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Piggot PJ, Coote JG. Genetic aspects of bacterial endospore formation. Bacteriol Rev. 1976;40: 908–962. pmid:12736
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997;390: 249–256. pmid:9384377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33: 103–119. pmid:2985470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Guérout-Fleury A-M, Shazand K, Frandsen N, Stragier P. Antibiotic-resistance cassettes for Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1995;167: 335–336. pmid:8566804
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Harwood CR, Cutting SM. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
26. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989.
27. Leskelä S, Kontinen VP, Sarvas M. Molecular analysis of an operon in Bacillus subtilis encoding a novel ABC transporter with a role in exoprotein production, sporulation and competence. Microbiol Read Engl. 1996;142 (Pt 1): 71–77.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Anagnostopoulos C, Spizizen J. Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1961;81: 741–746. pmid:16561900
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Lulko AT, Buist G, Kok J, Kuipers OP. Transcriptome Analysis of Temporal Regulation of Carbon Metabolism by CcpA in Bacillus subtilis Reveals Additional Target Genes. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;12: 82–95. pmid:17183215
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. van Hijum SAFT, de Jong A, Baerends RJS, Karsens HA, Kramer NE, Larsen R, et al. A generally applicable validation scheme for the assessment of factors involved in reproducibility and quality of DNA-microarray data. BMC Genomics. 2005;6: 77. pmid:15907200
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Long AD, Mangalam HJ, Chan BY, Tolleri L, Hatfield GW, Baldi P. Improved statistical inference from DNA microarray data using analysis of variance and a Bayesian statistical framework. Analysis of global gene expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 19937–19944. pmid:11259426
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. van Hijum SAFT, García de la Nava J, Trelles O, Kok J, Kuipers OP. MicroPreP: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework. Appl Bioinformatics. 2003;2: 241–244. pmid:15130795
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Blom E-J, Bosman DWJ, van Hijum SAFT, Breitling R, Tijsma L, Silvis R, et al. FIVA: Functional Information Viewer and Analyzer extracting biological knowledge from transcriptome data of prokaryotes. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2007;23: 1161–1163.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: D277–280. pmid:14681412
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25: 25–29. pmid:10802651
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278: 631–637. pmid:9381173
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Sierro N, Makita Y, de Hoon M, Nakai K. DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36: D93–D96. pmid:17962296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Fujita M, Losick R. Evidence that entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a gradual increase in the level and activity of the master regulator Spo0A. Genes Dev. 2005;19: 2236–2244. pmid:16166384
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Eijlander RT, de Jong A, Krawczyk AO, Holsappel S, Kuipers OP. SporeWeb: an interactive journey through the complete sporulation cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Flórez LA, Roppel SF, Schmeisky AG, Lammers CR, Stülke J. A community-curated consensual annotation that is continuously updated: the Bacillus subtilis centred wiki SubtiWiki. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2009;2009: bap012.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Ward JB, Zahler SA. Genetic studies of leucine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1973;116: 719–726. pmid:4200853
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Ebbole DJ, Zalkin H. Cloning and characterization of a 12-gene cluster from Bacillus subtilis encoding nine enzymes for de novo purine nucleotide synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1987;262: 8274–8287. pmid:3036807
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Molle V, Nakaura Y, Shivers RP, Yamaguchi H, Losick R, Fujita Y, et al. Additional targets of the Bacillus subtilis global regulator CodY identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation and genome-wide transcript analysis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185: 1911–1922. pmid:12618455
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. González-Pastor JE, Hobbs EC, Losick R. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science. 2003;301: 510–513. pmid:12817086
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Tojo S, Satomura T, Matsuoka H, Hirooka K, Fujita Y. Catabolite repression of the Bacillus subtilis FadR regulon, which is involved in fatty acid catabolism. J Bacteriol. 2011;193: 2388–2395. pmid:21398533
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Matsuoka H, Hirooka K, Fujita Y. Organization and function of the YsiA regulon of Bacillus subtilis involved in fatty acid degradation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 5180–5194. pmid:17189250
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Kaneda T. Fatty acids of the genus Bacillus: an example of branched-chain preference. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;41: 391–418. pmid:329832
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Koburger T, Weibezahn J, Bernhardt J, Homuth G, Hecker M. Genome-wide mRNA profiling in glucose starved Bacillus subtilis cells. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274: 1–12. pmid:15809868
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Nicholson WL, Munakata N, Horneck G, Melosh HJ, Setlow P. Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2000;64: 548–572. pmid:10974126
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Errington J. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1: 117–126. pmid:15035041
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36: 131–148. pmid:22091839
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Piggot PJ, Losick R. Sporulation genes and intercompartmental regulation. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and Its Closest Relative: From Genes to Cells. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2002. pp. 483–518.

[ref5] 5. Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Liu JS, et al. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50: 1683–1701. pmid:14651647
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Fawcett P, Eichenberger P, Losick R, Youngman P. The transcriptional profile of early to middle sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97: 8063–8068. pmid:10869437
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Burbulys D, Trach KA, Hoch JA. Initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell. 1991;64: 545–552. pmid:1846779
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Ireton K, Rudner DZ, Siranosian KJ, Grossman AD. Integration of multiple developmental signals in Bacillus subtilis through the Spo0A transcription factor. Genes Dev. 1993;7: 283–294. pmid:8436298
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Hilbert DW, Piggot PJ. Compartmentalization of Gene Expression during Bacillus subtilis Spore Formation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68: 234–262. pmid:15187183
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Stragier P, Losick R. Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu Rev Genet. 1996;30: 297–241. pmid:8982457
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Margolis P, Driks A, Losick R. Establishment of cell type by compartmentalized activation of a transcription factor. Science. 1991;254: 562–565. pmid:1948031
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Fort P, Piggot PJ. Nucleotide sequence of sporulation locus spoIIA in Bacillus subtilis. J Gen Microbiol. 1984;130: 2147–2153. pmid:6088674
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Duncan L, Losick R. SpoIIAB is an anti-sigma factor that binds to and inhibits transcription by regulatory protein sigma F from Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90: 2325–2329. pmid:8460142
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Duncan L, Alper S, Losick R. SpoIIAA governs the release of the cell-type specific transcription factor sigma F from its anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB. J Mol Biol. 1996;260: 147–164. pmid:8764397
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Schmidt R, Margolis P, Duncan L, Coppolecchia R, Moran CP Jr, Losick R. Control of developmental transcription factor sigma F by sporulation regulatory proteins SpoIIAA and SpoIIAB in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87: 9221–9225. pmid:2123551
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Illing N, Errington J. Genetic regulation of morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis: roles of sigma E and sigma F in prespore engulfment. J Bacteriol. 1991;173: 3159–3169. pmid:1902463
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Setlow B, Magill N, Febbroriello P, Nakhimovsky L, Koppel DE, Setlow P. Condensation of the forespore nucleoid early in sporulation of Bacillus species. J Bacteriol. 1991;173: 6270–6278. pmid:1917859
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Dworkin J, Losick R. Developmental Commitment in a Bacterium. Cell. 2005;121: 401–409. pmid:15882622
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Steil L, Serrano M, Henriques AO, Völker U. Genome-wide analysis of temporally regulated and compartment-specific gene expression in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Read Engl. 2005;151: 399–420.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Wang ST, Setlow B, Conlon EM, Lyon JL, Imamura D, Sato T, et al. The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol. 2006;358: 16–37. pmid:16497325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Piggot PJ, Coote JG. Genetic aspects of bacterial endospore formation. Bacteriol Rev. 1976;40: 908–962. pmid:12736
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997;390: 249–256. pmid:9384377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33: 103–119. pmid:2985470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Guérout-Fleury A-M, Shazand K, Frandsen N, Stragier P. Antibiotic-resistance cassettes for Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1995;167: 335–336. pmid:8566804
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Harwood CR, Cutting SM. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. John Wiley & Sons; 1990.

[ref26] 26. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989.

[ref27] 27. Leskelä S, Kontinen VP, Sarvas M. Molecular analysis of an operon in Bacillus subtilis encoding a novel ABC transporter with a role in exoprotein production, sporulation and competence. Microbiol Read Engl. 1996;142 (Pt 1): 71–77.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Anagnostopoulos C, Spizizen J. Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1961;81: 741–746. pmid:16561900
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Lulko AT, Buist G, Kok J, Kuipers OP. Transcriptome Analysis of Temporal Regulation of Carbon Metabolism by CcpA in Bacillus subtilis Reveals Additional Target Genes. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;12: 82–95. pmid:17183215
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. van Hijum SAFT, de Jong A, Baerends RJS, Karsens HA, Kramer NE, Larsen R, et al. A generally applicable validation scheme for the assessment of factors involved in reproducibility and quality of DNA-microarray data. BMC Genomics. 2005;6: 77. pmid:15907200
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Long AD, Mangalam HJ, Chan BY, Tolleri L, Hatfield GW, Baldi P. Improved statistical inference from DNA microarray data using analysis of variance and a Bayesian statistical framework. Analysis of global gene expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem. 2001;276: 19937–19944. pmid:11259426
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. van Hijum SAFT, García de la Nava J, Trelles O, Kok J, Kuipers OP. MicroPreP: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework. Appl Bioinformatics. 2003;2: 241–244. pmid:15130795
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Blom E-J, Bosman DWJ, van Hijum SAFT, Breitling R, Tijsma L, Silvis R, et al. FIVA: Functional Information Viewer and Analyzer extracting biological knowledge from transcriptome data of prokaryotes. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2007;23: 1161–1163.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: D277–280. pmid:14681412
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25: 25–29. pmid:10802651
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278: 631–637. pmid:9381173
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Sierro N, Makita Y, de Hoon M, Nakai K. DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36: D93–D96. pmid:17962296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Fujita M, Losick R. Evidence that entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a gradual increase in the level and activity of the master regulator Spo0A. Genes Dev. 2005;19: 2236–2244. pmid:16166384
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Eijlander RT, de Jong A, Krawczyk AO, Holsappel S, Kuipers OP. SporeWeb: an interactive journey through the complete sporulation cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Flórez LA, Roppel SF, Schmeisky AG, Lammers CR, Stülke J. A community-curated consensual annotation that is continuously updated: the Bacillus subtilis centred wiki SubtiWiki. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2009;2009: bap012.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Ward JB, Zahler SA. Genetic studies of leucine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1973;116: 719–726. pmid:4200853
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ebbole DJ, Zalkin H. Cloning and characterization of a 12-gene cluster from Bacillus subtilis encoding nine enzymes for de novo purine nucleotide synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1987;262: 8274–8287. pmid:3036807
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Molle V, Nakaura Y, Shivers RP, Yamaguchi H, Losick R, Fujita Y, et al. Additional targets of the Bacillus subtilis global regulator CodY identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation and genome-wide transcript analysis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185: 1911–1922. pmid:12618455
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. González-Pastor JE, Hobbs EC, Losick R. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science. 2003;301: 510–513. pmid:12817086
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Tojo S, Satomura T, Matsuoka H, Hirooka K, Fujita Y. Catabolite repression of the Bacillus subtilis FadR regulon, which is involved in fatty acid catabolism. J Bacteriol. 2011;193: 2388–2395. pmid:21398533
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Matsuoka H, Hirooka K, Fujita Y. Organization and function of the YsiA regulon of Bacillus subtilis involved in fatty acid degradation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 5180–5194. pmid:17189250
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Kaneda T. Fatty acids of the genus Bacillus: an example of branched-chain preference. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;41: 391–418. pmid:329832
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Koburger T, Weibezahn J, Bernhardt J, Homuth G, Hecker M. Genome-wide mRNA profiling in glucose starved Bacillus subtilis cells. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;274: 1–12. pmid:15809868
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, media and growth conditions

Recombinant DNA techniques and oligonucleotides

Determination of sporulation frequencies

Growth and preparation of cells for RNA isolation

DNA microarray analysis

Results & Discussion

Construction of B. subtilis sigF mutant strain

Initiation of sporulation cascade hampered in sigF deletion strain

Transcriptional profile under non-sporulation conditions

Concluding remarks

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. FIVA analysis of B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc gene expression under sporulation conditions.

S1 Table. Top 200 genes down-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under sporulation conditions.

S2 Table. Top 200 genes up-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under sporulation conditions.

S3 Table. Total genes down-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under non-sporulation conditions.

S4 Table. Total genes up-regulated in B. subtilis 168 sigF::spc under non-sporulation conditions.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References