Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Unique Expression of Keratin 14 in a Subset of Trophoblast Cells

  • Wassim Abou-Kheir ,

    wa12@aub.edu.lb (WAK); gd12@aub.edu.lb (GD)

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Assaad Eid,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Rabih El-Merahbi,

    Current address: Rudolf Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Rebecca Assaf,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Georges Daoud

    wa12@aub.edu.lb (WAK); gd12@aub.edu.lb (GD)

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Abstract

The placenta, a transient organ in human, is essential for pregnancy maintenance and for fetal growth and development. Trophoblast and stromal cells are the main cell types present in human placenta. Trophoblast cells are present in different subtypes depending on their differentiation state and their temporal and spatial location during pregnancy. The stromal cells are of extraembryonic mesenchymal origin and are important for villous formation and maintenance. Interestingly, many pregnancy–related diseases are associated with defect in trophoblast differentiation and villous integrity. Therefore, it's crucial to specifically identify each type of placental cells using specific markers. Keratins (CK) are widely used as marker of epithelial cells, cancer origin identification and in some cases as marker of stem/progenitor cells. Vimentin is widely used as marker of mesenchymal cells. The aim of this study is to characterize the presence of different keratins in human trophoblast cells and vimentin in stromal cells. Using immunohistochemistry on term placental sections, our results show that vimentin is solely expressed in stromal-mesenchymal cells while keratins 5, 7, 8, 14 and 19 are expressed in trophoblast cells. Interestingly, all keratins tested, except for keratin 14, were evenly expressed in all trophoblast cells. Keratin 14 was expressed in a subset of CK7 positive cells. Moreover, the same results were obtained when using freshly isolated cytotrophoblast cells or BeWo cells. In conclusion, this study is a crucial step in the advancement of our knowledge in placental cell type identification and characterization.

Introduction

The placenta plays a major role in the maintenance of pregnancy and in the development of the fetus. After fertilization, the first differentiation process in mammalian zygote is the formation of the trophectoderm layer that gives rise to the placenta and the inner cell mass (ICM), which forms the embryo proper. Interestingly, trophectoderm cells are polarized and have the characteristic of an epithelium while ICM blastomeres are devoid of polarity [13]. This epithelialization is associated with an increase in E-cadherin expression and activity [46] which is a major component of adherens junctions (AJ) present in most epithelial tissues [7]. Loss of E-cadherin expression affects AJ formation that in turn interferes with tight junction (TJ) formation in epithelia [8, 9]. These TJ in the trophectoderm layer are essential for the formation of the blastocoel cavity and for continuing embryonic development [10]. Therefore, the presence of these AJ and TJ confirms the epithelial phenotype of the trophectoderm layer and of all its subsequent trophoblast cell derivatives. Interestingly, trophoblast cells are also reported to express many members of the keratins family [11] that are largely used to identify epithelial cells [12, 13].

Keratins, previously known as cytokeratins, are forming parts of intermediate filaments and they provide mechanical and structural support to epithelial cells [14]. In addition, keratins are reported to play a role in different cellular functions including protection from apoptosis [15, 16], protection of liver cells against stress [17], regulation of cell size and protein synthesis during wound healing [18] and protection of placental barrier function [19, 20]. The sequencing of the human genome identified 54 different keratin genes classified into type I and type II and each type is subdivided into epithelial and hair keratins [21]. Keratins assemble in heterodimers to form intermediate filaments using type I and type II proteins. Their pattern of expression depends on the epithelial cell type and the state of differentiation of these cells [13]. For example, CK8/CK18 are widely expressed in simple epithelia such as the liver, acinar cells of the pancreas, intestinal cells, pseudostratified epithelia (e.g. respiratory) and in complex epithelia (e.g. glandular) [13]. Moreover, CK8/C18 are the first keratins to appear during embryogenesis, as early as pre-implantation stage [22]. In the same manner, CK7/CK19 are expressed in some simple epithelia and are called secondary keratins to CK8/CK18. Furthermore, CK20 is expressed and almost restricted to intestinal epithelial cells [23, 24]. Interestingly, different keratins were reported to be present in human placenta. Muhlhauser et al [25] showed an expression of keratins 7, 8, 13, 18 and 19 in villous and extravillous trophoblast cells. Keratins 8, 17, 18 and 19 are reported to be expressed in endovascular trophoblast cells [26]. Moreover, keratin 7 is used as marker of trophoblast cells during cytotrophoblast isolation from human placenta [27, 28]. Interestingly, CK20 was only expressed in molar pregnancy (100 and 50% in total and partial mole respectively) while no expression was detected in normal placenta [29]. Finally, some keratins are used in tumor diagnosis of several carcinomas especially in metastatic cancer to identify the primary site of the tumor [13]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the expression and localization of several keratins in human placenta, primary culture cytotrophoblast cells and the BeWo chorioncarcinoma cell line.

Materials and Methods

Human placental cytotrophoblast cells isolation and purity evaluation

Human term placentas were collected after normal vaginal delivery from 38–40 weeks pregnancies. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) which waived the need for a consent form from the patients. Cytotrophoblast cells were isolated following the protocol described by Kliman et al [30] with minor modifications [27]. Briefly, fetal and maternal membranes were removed and tissue was cut into 1-inch cubes and washed extensively with 0.9% saline until blood-free specimens were obtained. Then, the tissue pieces were minced and subjected to 4 digestions containing trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) and DNase (Roche life Science). After each digestion, the supernatant was collected and replaced with fresh digestion medium. The supernatant of the first digestion was discarded and the following ones were layered onto calf serum and centrifuged at 1215xg for 15 min. Pellets from the collected digestions were pooled and suspended in DMEM-HG (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium-High Glucose) containing PSN (2x) (Penicillin-Streptomycin-Neomycin), deposited on top of a discontinuous 5–70% (v/v) Percoll gradient and centrifuged at 507g for 25 min. Layers containing cytotrophoblast cells were collected, washed in DMEM-HG containing PSN (2x) and used for immunostaining using a cytospin chamber.

Cell culture

BeWo cells (ATCC # CCL–98) were a gift from Dr Julie Lafond (University of Québec at Montréal, Canada); they were cultured in F-12K medium (Ham’s F-12-Kaighn’s), supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.

Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy

Antibodies and Reagents.

All information about the antibodies used in this study is listed in Table 1. Fluoro-gel II with Dapi was purchased from EMS (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA).

thumbnail
Table 1. list of antibodies used in immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.t001

Immunohistochemistry.

Term placental tissues were collected and fixed in 4% formalin overnight, rinsed in PBS, and transferred to 70% ethanol before standard processing to obtain paraffin-embedded sections. Unstained tissue sections were deparaffinized, and antigen retrieval was performed in a citrate buffer in a steamer at 100°C for 60 min followed by 30 min incubation at room temperature. Slides were treated with peroxidase block for 5 min and then blocking was performed with protein block from Leica biosystems (UK) for 5 min at room temperature. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C, followed by post primary block for 30 min. Slides were incubated then with Novolink polymer (Leica biosystems, UK) for 30 min followed by incubation with DAB chromogen prepared in Novolink DAB substrate buffer for 5 min. All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Immunofluorescence.

Double immunofluorescence was performed on tissue sections using the same protocol used for IHC with the following exceptions: The secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti‐mouse and goat ant-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 568 conjugated goat anti‐rabbit and goat anti-mouse IgG. Slides were mounted with the anti-fade Fluoro-gel II with Dapi. For immunofluorescence of cell lines grown in vitro, adherent cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 10 min, followed by permeabilization with 0.5% Triton X‐100 in PBS for 3 min. Non‐specific sites were blocked by incubation in 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min. Cells were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the specified primary antibodies in the blocking buffer. Cells were washed, incubated with the respective secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 or 568) in blocking buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, slides were washed and mounted using the anti‐fade reagent Fluoro‐gel II with Dapi.

For cytospin cells, single-cell suspensions were washed twice with PBS, and 5 x 104 cells were deposited on glass slides in PBS by centrifugation at 1,000 rpm for 2 minutes using a cytospin system from Thermo Shandon (Thermoscientific, PA). Cells were fixed and stained as described earlier.

Confocal microscopic analyses were performed using Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope and images were acquired and analyzed using the ZEN image software.

Results

Expression of Vimentin, E-cadherin and Keratin 7 in human term placental sections

During placental development, the villus is formed of two cell types. The outer layer is formed by epithelial cells called trophoblast cells and the villus core is formed of mesenchymal cells and blood vessels. E-cadherin and vimentin are widely used as marker of epithelial and mesenchymal cells respectively while CK7 is used as marker of trophoblast cells [27, 28]. We used these characteristics to identify and delineate the different cell types on placental cross sections. Therefore, sections were stained with H&E, E-cadherin, vimentin or CK7. The H&E staining showed a normal shape of villi containing blood vessels (Fig 1A) and surrounded by a layer of trophoblast cells as shown by CK7 staining (Fig 1B). As expected, our results showed a clear staining of E-cadherin in the trophoblast layer of villi while vimentin was specifically expressed in the mesodermal core of the villi (Fig 1C and 1D).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Basic histology of human term placenta.

Paraffin-embedded sections of human term placenta are stained with H&E (A), CK7 (B) and E-Cad/VIM/Dapi (C). (D) is a higher magnification of (C). Representative images of at least 3 different placentas are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g001

Expression of cytokeratins in human term placentas

The expression of different types of CK in human term placentas was evaluated using immunofluorescence staining. The results were the same in different placental sections and all control slides using rabbit or mouse IgG were negative. As shown in fig 2, CK5, 7, 8 and 19 were expressed in the trophoblast layer. Furthermore, a clear staining with vimentin of the mesenchymal core of villi is showed (Fig 2). Interestingly, no overlay expression between vimentin and any of the tested CKs is noted which further confirm the expression of CKs only in trophoblast cells.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Trophoblasts are characterized by keratins expression.

Paraffin-embedded sections of human term placenta are stained with Vimentin to mark the stromal cells in the villi, and with keratin 19 (CK19), keratin 8 (CK8), keratin 5 (CK5) and keratin 7 (CK7) to mark the trophoblast cells. Dapi is used to counterstain the nucleus. Representative images of 3 different placentas are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g002

Surprisingly, CK14 expression is restricted to few cells in contrast to the expression of all CK tested that showed an equal distribution among the trophoblast layer (Figs 2 and 3). Moreover, CK14 expression was restricted to epithelial cells as all CK14 positive cells were negative for vimentin (Fig 3A). Furthermore, CK14 positive cells were also positive for CK7, CK8 and CK19 (Fig 3B and 3C) confirming their epithelial phenotype. These results suggest that CK14 might be a specific marker of a specific subpopulation of trophoblast cells.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Expression pattern of keratin 14.

Paraffin-embedded sections of human term placenta are stained with keratin 14 (CK14) along with Vimentin, keratin 19 (CK19), keratin 8 (CK8) and keratin 7 (CK7). Dapi is used to counterstain the nucleus. Representative images of 3 different placentas are shown. The arrows indicate the presence of CK14.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g003

Expression of keratins in BeWo choriocarcinoma cell line

The expression of CKs was also evaluated in a choriocarcinoma cell line BeWo. These cells are derived from human placental trophoblast cells and therefore they are of epithelial origin. Moreover, they are largely used to study trophoblast differentiation and invasion [3133]. As expected, BeWo cells expressed all type of keratins tested as shown for placental sections. They expressed high level of CK5, 7, 8 and 19 (Fig 4). Interestingly, the expression of CK14 in BeWo cells is restricted to a limited number of positive cells (Fig 4). This result is in line with our finding for placental sections.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Keratins expression in BeWo cells.

Representative immunofluorescent images of BeWo cells stained for the indicated antibodies and for Dapi are shown. The arrow indicates the presence of CK14. These experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g004

Expression of CK14 in freshly isolated cytotrophoblast cells

Cytotrophoblast cells were freshly isolated from human term placentas of 38–40 weeks of pregnancy. The purity of cytotrophoblast cells was evaluated using CK7 as trophoblast marker [34]. Our results indicated that more than 95% of cells are positive for CK7 (Fig 5). Therefore, these cells were further screened for CK8, 19 and most importantly CK14. Fig 5 showed a clear expression of CK8 and CK19 in cytotrophoblast cells. Interestingly, CK14 expression was restricted to few cells as shown for BeWo cells and placental sections. The percentage of CK14 positive cells is less than 1% as shown in fig 5. In order to identify the origin of CK14 positive cells, freshly isolated cytotrophoblast cells were co-stained with either vimentin or CK7. Fig 6 shows that CK14 positive cells are also CK7 positive and vimentin negative confirming the trophoblast origin of these cells. Interestingly, it should be noted that CK14 positive cells are larger in size and bi-nucleated in some cases suggesting actively dividing cells (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Keratins expression in primary trophoblast cells.

Representative immunofluorescent images of cytospin preparations of primary trophoblast cells, isolated from human term placenta, stained for the indicated antibodies and for Dapi are shown. The arrows indicate the presence of CK14. These experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. Expression of keratin 14 in primary trophoblast cells.

Representative immunofluorescent images of cytospin preparations of primary trophoblast cells, isolated from human term placenta, stained for the indicated antibodies and for Dapi are shown. The arrows indicate the presence of CK14. These experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139939.g006

Discussion

Trophectoderm formation is the first differentiation event during human development and forms the wall of the blastocyst. This wall of trophoblast cells will ultimately participate along the extraembryonic mesoderm to form the placenta with all its cellular components [35]. Early during pregnancy, trophoblast cells are very important for normal implantation and for uterine wall invasion [36]. Interestingly, many pregnancy-related diseases are associated with a defect in trophoblast differentiation and function [37] and therefore, it is essential to distinguish between the different placental cell types when studying placental development and functions. Many studies have used different markers including vimentin, E-cadherin and cytokeratins to characterize the epithelial or mesenchymal origin of cells [3840]. In this study, we showed a clear difference between the epithelial cells (E-cadherin positive) and stromal cells (vimentin positive). Previously, Kohnen et al showed that placental stromal cells specifically express vimentin at all stages of placental stem villi formation while all trophoblast cells were negative for vimentin as expected and in accordance with our results [41]. Therefore, vimentin can be used as marker of placental stromal cells. Interestingly, all epithelial cells stained positive for keratin 7, a marker of pan trophoblast cells [28, 42]. In this study, we report the expression of CK5, 7, 8, 14, and 19 in trophoblast cells. It should be noted that while many reports have reported an expression of different keratins in human placentas, none have reported an expression of CK14 in trophoblast cells [25, 29, 43]. In human placenta, keratins expression was reported to be up-regulated on the pathway to extravillous trophoblast cells [43]. Moreover, it has been reported that keratin expression varies among different trophoblast cells depending on their location and differentiation state [25]. Furthermore, Haigh et al reported an expression of cytokeratins 8 and 18 in a fibroblast cell strain isolated from placental explant [34]. All these results suggest that keratins are not only important for the cytoskeleton maintenance but also important molecules playing a role in cell function and differentiation.

Finally, keratins are widely used as markers of cancer origin and epithelial lineage including prostate, colon and breast [12, 38, 44]. Moreover, they are used as possible marker of stem cells population [13, 45]. In our study, we found that the expression of CK14 is limited to few cells in BeWo, freshly isolated cytotrophoblast cells and human placental sections suggesting that CK14 is only expressed in a subpopulation of trophoblast cells. CK17 was suggested as marker of intramural cytotrophoblast in human first trimester uteroplacental arteries [26] and K20 expression was shown to be expressed in gestational trophoblastic diseases such as complete mole [29]. Moreover, CK15 is used as marker of epidermal stem cells [45] while CK14 is used to identify the commitment of embryonic stem cells to an epidermal cell fate and their further differentiation into the basal layer of the epidermis [46]. In this study, we reported the expression of CK14 in a subpopulation of trophoblast cells while Ahenkorah et al reported a strong expression of CK14 in the amniotic epithelium with no expression in trophoblast cells [43]. Furthermore, Genbacev et al reported the establishment of human trophoblast progenitor cell lines from the chorionic membrane [47]. Therefore, it would be interesting to identify the origin of the CK14 positive trophoblast cells and if they are derivative of the CK14 positive amniotic epithelium. Finally, it would be interesting to identify the fate and characterize these CK14 positive trophoblast cells.

In conclusion, this study shows an expression of different keratins in human trophoblast cells in placental sections, freshly isolated cytotrophoblast cells and in BeWo cells. Interestingly, CK14 expression is expressed in a subpopulation of trophoblast cells. Since cytokeratins are used as markers of stem/progenitor cells, we suggest that this subpopulation of CK14 positive trophoblast cells might be a trophoblast progenitor/stem cells.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the members of the Abou-Kheir and Daoud’s Laboratories for their help on this work. We would like to thank Dr. Julie Lafond for her generous gift of the BeWo cells. We would like to thank Dr. Elie Al-Chaer for proofreading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WAK AE GD. Performed the experiments: REM RA. Analyzed the data: WAK AE GD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WAK AE GD. Wrote the paper: GD REM WAK.

References

  1. 1. Handyside AH. Distribution of antibody- and lectin-binding sites on dissociated blastomeres from mouse morulae: evidence for polarization at compaction. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1980;60:99–116. pmid:7310282.
  2. 2. Reeve WJ. Cytoplasmic polarity develops at compaction in rat and mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981;62:351–67. pmid:7276818.
  3. 3. Reeve WJ, Ziomek CA. Distribution of microvilli on dissociated blastomeres from mouse embryos: evidence for surface polarization at compaction. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981;62:339–50. pmid:7276817.
  4. 4. De Vries WN, Evsikov AV, Haac BE, Fancher KS, Holbrook AE, Kemler R, et al. Maternal beta-catenin and E-cadherin in mouse development. Development. 2004;131(18):4435–45. pmid:15306566.
  5. 5. Johnson MH, Maro B, Takeichi M. The role of cell adhesion in the synchronization and orientation of polarization in 8-cell mouse blastomeres. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986;93:239–55. pmid:3090189.
  6. 6. Shirayoshi Y, Okada TS, Takeichi M. The calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion system regulates inner cell mass formation and cell surface polarization in early mouse development. Cell. 1983;35(3 Pt 2):631–8. pmid:6652680.
  7. 7. Niessen CM, Gottardi CJ. Molecular components of the adherens junction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):562–71. pmid:18206110; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2276178.
  8. 8. Larue L, Ohsugi M, Hirchenhain J, Kemler R. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(17):8263–7. pmid:8058792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC44586.
  9. 9. Ohsugi M, Larue L, Schwarz H, Kemler R. Cell-junctional and cytoskeletal organization in mouse blastocysts lacking E-cadherin. Dev Biol. 1997;185(2):261–71. pmid:9187087.
  10. 10. Moriwaki K, Tsukita S, Furuse M. Tight junctions containing claudin 4 and 6 are essential for blastocyst formation in preimplantation mouse embryos. Dev Biol. 2007;312(2):509–22. pmid:17980358.
  11. 11. Gauster M, Blaschitz A, Siwetz M, Huppertz B. Keratins in the human trophoblast. Histol Histopathol. 2013;28(7):817–25. pmid:23450430.
  12. 12. Karantza V. Keratins in health and cancer: more than mere epithelial cell markers. Oncogene. 2011;30(2):127–38. pmid:20890307; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3155291.
  13. 13. Moll R, Divo M, Langbein L. The human keratins: biology and pathology. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;129(6):705–33. pmid:18461349; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2386534.
  14. 14. Fuchs E. Evolution and complexity of the genes encoding the keratins of human epidermal cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1983;81(1 Suppl):141s–4s. pmid:6190959.
  15. 15. Caulin C, Ware CF, Magin TM, Oshima RG. Keratin-dependent, epithelial resistance to tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 2000;149(1):17–22. pmid:10747083; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2175089.
  16. 16. Ku NO, Soetikno RM, Omary MB. Keratin mutation in transgenic mice predisposes to Fas but not TNF-induced apoptosis and massive liver injury. Hepatology. 2003;37(5):1006–14. pmid:12717381.
  17. 17. Ku NO, Darling JM, Krams SM, Esquivel CO, Keeffe EB, Sibley RK, et al. Keratin 8 and 18 mutations are risk factors for developing liver disease of multiple etiologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(10):6063–8. pmid:12724528; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC156326.
  18. 18. Kim S, Wong P, Coulombe PA. A keratin cytoskeletal protein regulates protein synthesis and epithelial cell growth. Nature. 2006;441(7091):362–5. pmid:16710422.
  19. 19. Hesse M, Franz T, Tamai Y, Taketo MM, Magin TM. Targeted deletion of keratins 18 and 19 leads to trophoblast fragility and early embryonic lethality. EMBO J. 2000;19(19):5060–70. pmid:11013209; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC302090.
  20. 20. Jaquemar D, Kupriyanov S, Wankell M, Avis J, Benirschke K, Baribault H, et al. Keratin 8 protection of placental barrier function. J Cell Biol. 2003;161(4):749–56. pmid:12771125; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2199358.
  21. 21. Schweizer J, Bowden PE, Coulombe PA, Langbein L, Lane EB, Magin TM, et al. New consensus nomenclature for mammalian keratins. J Cell Biol. 2006;174(2):169–74. pmid:16831889; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2064177.
  22. 22. Jackson BW, Grund C, Schmid E, Burki K, Franke WW, Illmensee K. Formation of cytoskeletal elements during mouse embryogenesis. Intermediate filaments of the cytokeratin type and desmosomes in preimplantation embryos. Differentiation. 1980;17(3):161–79. pmid:6161051.
  23. 23. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982;31(1):11–24. pmid:6186379.
  24. 24. Moll R, Schiller DL, Franke WW. Identification of protein IT of the intestinal cytoskeleton as a novel type I cytokeratin with unusual properties and expression patterns. J Cell Biol. 1990;111(2):567–80. pmid:1696264; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2116178.
  25. 25. Muhlhauser J, Crescimanno C, Kasper M, Zaccheo D, Castellucci M. Differentiation of human trophoblast populations involves alterations in cytokeratin patterns. J Histochem Cytochem. 1995;43(6):579–89. pmid:7539466.
  26. 26. Proll J, Blaschitz A, Hartmann M, Thalhamer J, Dohr G. Cytokeratin 17 as an immunohistochemical marker for intramural cytotrophoblast in human first trimester uteroplacental arteries. Cell Tissue Res. 1997;288(2):335–43. pmid:9082969.
  27. 27. Daoud G, Simoneau L, Masse A, Rassart E, Lafond J. Expression of cFABP and PPAR in trophoblast cells: effect of PPAR ligands on linoleic acid uptake and differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1687(1–3):181–94. pmid:15708366.
  28. 28. Maldonado-Estrada J, Menu E, Roques P, Barre-Sinoussi F, Chaouat G. Evaluation of Cytokeratin 7 as an accurate intracellular marker with which to assess the purity of human placental villous trophoblast cells by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2004;286(1–2):21–34. pmid:15087219.
  29. 29. Stackievicz R, Drucker L, Zemer R, Klein A, Markovitch O, Yarkoni S. Cytokeratin 20 as a biomarker of gestational trophoblastic disease: diagnostic and prognostic significance. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87(1):34–8. pmid:12468339.
  30. 30. Kliman HJ, Nestler JE, Sermasi E, Sanger JM, Strauss JF 3rd. Purification, characterization, and in vitro differentiation of cytotrophoblasts from human term placentae. Endocrinology. 1986;118(4):1567–82. pmid:3512258.
  31. 31. Hohn HP, Linke M, Ugele B, Denker HW. Differentiation markers and invasiveness: discordant regulation in normal trophoblast and choriocarcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 1998;244(1):249–58. pmid:9770367.
  32. 32. Speeg KV Jr., Azizkhan JC, Stromberg K. The stimulation by methotrexate of human chorionic gonadotropin and placental alkaline phosphatase in cultured choriocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1976;36(12):4570–6. pmid:1087181.
  33. 33. Taylor CM, Stevens H, Anthony FW, Wheeler T. Influence of hypoxia on vascular endothelial growth factor and chorionic gonadotrophin production in the trophoblast-derived cell lines: JEG, JAr and BeWo. Placenta. 1997;18(5–6):451–8. pmid:9250709.
  34. 34. Haigh T, Chen C, Jones CJ, Aplin JD. Studies of mesenchymal cells from 1st trimester human placenta: expression of cytokeratin outside the trophoblast lineage. Placenta. 1999;20(8):615–25. pmid:10527816.
  35. 35. Benirschke K. Pathology of the human placenta. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2012.
  36. 36. Bischof P, Irminger-Finger I. The human cytotrophoblastic cell, a mononuclear chameleon. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37(1):1–16. pmid:15381142.
  37. 37. Jauniaux E, Poston L, Burton GJ. Placental-related diseases of pregnancy: Involvement of oxidative stress and implications in human evolution. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(6):747–55. pmid:16682385; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1876942.
  38. 38. Abou-Kheir W, Hynes PG, Martin P, Yin JJ, Liu YN, Seng V, et al. Self-renewing Pten-/- TP53-/- protospheres produce metastatic adenocarcinoma cell lines with multipotent progenitor activity. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26112. pmid:22022528; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3191168.
  39. 39. Liu YN, Abou-Kheir W, Yin JJ, Fang L, Hynes P, Casey O, et al. Critical and reciprocal regulation of KLF4 and SLUG in transforming growth factor beta-initiated prostate cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(5):941–53. pmid:22203039; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3295188.
  40. 40. Martin P, Liu YN, Pierce R, Abou-Kheir W, Casey O, Seng V, et al. Prostate epithelial Pten/TP53 loss leads to transformation of multipotential progenitors and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(1):422–35. pmid:21703421; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3123810.
  41. 41. Kohnen G, Kertschanska S, Demir R, Kaufmann P. Placental villous stroma as a model system for myofibroblast differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. 1996;105(6):415–29. pmid:8791101.
  42. 42. Daoud G, Amyot M, Rassart E, Masse A, Simoneau L, Lafond J. ERK1/2 and p38 regulate trophoblasts differentiation in human term placenta. J Physiol. 2005;566(Pt 2):409–23. pmid:15890698; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1464762.
  43. 43. Ahenkorah J, Hottor B, Byrne S, Bosio P, Ockleford CD. Immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy and immuno-electron microscopic identification of keratins in human materno-foetal interaction zone. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(4):735–48. pmid:18466353.
  44. 44. Abou-Kheir WG, Hynes PG, Martin PL, Pierce R, Kelly K. Characterizing the contribution of stem/progenitor cells to tumorigenesis in the Pten-/-TP53-/- prostate cancer model. Stem Cells. 2010;28(12):2129–40. pmid:20936707.
  45. 45. Bose A, Teh MT, Mackenzie IC, Waseem A. Keratin k15 as a biomarker of epidermal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(10):19385–98. pmid:24071939; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3821562.
  46. 46. Troy TC, Turksen K. Commitment of embryonic stem cells to an epidermal cell fate and differentiation in vitro. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(2):293–300. pmid:15614782.
  47. 47. Genbacev O, Donne M, Kapidzic M, Gormley M, Lamb J, Gilmore J, et al. Establishment of human trophoblast progenitor cell lines from the chorion. Stem Cells. 2011;29(9):1427–36. pmid:21755573; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3345889.