Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

High-Resolution Analyses of Human Leukocyte Antigens Allele and Haplotype Frequencies Based on 169,995 Volunteers from the China Bone Marrow Donor Registry Program

  • Xiao-Yang Zhou,

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Fa-Ming Zhu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Zhejiang Blood Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

  • Jian-Ping Li,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Liaoning Blood Center, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

  • Wei Mao,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Chongqing Blood Center, Chongqing, China

  • De-Mei Zhang,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Taiyuan Red Cross Blood Center, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

  • Meng-Li Liu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Shaanxi Blood Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

  • Ai-Lian Hei,

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Da-Peng Dai,

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Ping Jiang,

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Xiao-Yan Shan,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Beijing Red Cross Blood Center, Beijing, China

  • Bo-Wei Zhang,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Henan Blood Center, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

  • Chuan-Fu Zhu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Shandong Blood Center, Jinan, Shandong

  • Jie Shen,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

  • Zhi-Hui Deng,

    Affiliation The Key Laboratory of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Shenzhen Blood Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

  • Zheng-Lei Wang,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Hebei Blood Center, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

  • Wei-Jian Yu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Dalian Red Cross Blood Center, Dalian, Liaoning, China

  • Qiang Chen,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Yan-Hui Qiao,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Xinjiang Blood Center, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China

  • Xiang-Ming Zhu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Kunming Blood Center, Kunming, Yunnan, China

  • Rong Lv,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Hefei Red Cross Blood Center, Hefei, Anhui, China

  • Guo-Ying Li,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Gansu Red Cross Blood Center, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

  • Guo-Liang Li,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Jiangxi Blood Center, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

  • Heng-Cong Li,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Nanning Blood Center, Nanning, Guangxi, China

  • Xu Zhang,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Liaoning Blood Center, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

  • Bin Pei,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Xiamen Blood Center, Xiamen, Fujian, China

  • Li-Xin Jiao,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Changchun Blood Center, Changchun, Jilin, China

  • Gang Shen,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Wuhan Blood Center, Wuhan, Hubei, China

  • Ying Liu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Harbin Red Cross Blood Center, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China

  • Zhi-Hui Feng,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Qingdao Blood Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China

  • Yu-Ping Su,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Yueyang Red Cross Blood Center, Yueyang, Hunan, China

  • Zhao-Xia Xu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Changsha Blood Center, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Wen-Ying Di,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Soochow Red Cross Blood Center, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

  • Yao-Qin Jiang,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Shanghai Blood Center, Shanghai, China

  • Hong-Lei Fu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, BFR Transplant Diagnostic Service Center, Beijing China

  • Xiang-Jun Liu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, BFR Transplant Diagnostic Service Center, Beijing China

  • Xiang Liu,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, CapitalBio Corporation, Beijing, China

  • Mei-Zhen Zhou,

    Affiliation HLA Laboratory, Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

  • Dan Du,

    Affiliation Department of HLA Technology, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Qi Liu,

    Affiliation Department of HLA Technology, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Ying Han,

    Affiliation Department of HLA Technology, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • Zhi-Xin Zhang ,

    zzxhla@yahoo.com.cn (ZXZ); caijp61@vip.sina.com (JPC)

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  •  [ ... ],
  • Jian-Ping Cai

    zzxhla@yahoo.com.cn (ZXZ); caijp61@vip.sina.com (JPC)

    Affiliations The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing hospital & Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China, Quality control laboratory, China Bone Marrow Program, Beijing, China

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a widely used and effective therapy for hematopoietic malignant diseases and numerous other disorders. High-resolution human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype frequency distributions not only facilitate individual donor searches but also determine the probability with which a particular patient can find HLA-matched donors in a registry. The frequencies of the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles and haplotypes were estimated among 169,995 Chinese volunteers using the sequencing-based typing (SBT) method. Totals of 191 HLA-A, 244 HLA-B, 146 HLA-C, 143 HLA-DRB1 and 47 HLA-DQB1 alleles were observed, which accounted for 6.98%, 7.06%, 6.46%, 9.11% and 7.91%, respectively, of the alleles in each locus in the world (IMGT 3.16 Release, Apr. 2014). Among the 100 most common haplotypes from the 169,995 individuals, nine distinct haplotypes displayed significant regionally specific distributions. Among these, three were predominant in the South China region (i.e., the 20th, 31st, and 81sthaplotypes), another three were predominant in the Southwest China region (i.e., the 68th, 79th, and 95th haplotypes), one was predominant in the South and Southwest China regions (the 18th haplotype), one was relatively common in the Northeast and North China regions (the 94th haplotype), and one was common in the Northeast, North and Northwest China (the 40th haplotype). In conclusion, this is the first to analyze high-resolution HLA diversities across the entire country of China, based on a detailed and complete data set that covered 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. Specifically, we also evaluated the HLA matching probabilities within and between geographic regions and analyzed the regional differences in the HLA diversities in China. We believe that the data presented in this study might be useful for unrelated HLA-matched donor searches, donor registry planning, population genetic studies, and anthropogenesis studies.

Introduction

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system is well known as a highly polymorphic genetic system. The main function of HLA molecules is to present antigenic peptides to the immune system and thus regulate the induction of immune responses [1,2]. As a consequence of many features, HLA antigens have an important influence on the outcome of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) [3]. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-established therapy for hematologic and lymphoid cancers and numerous other disorders [46]. In recent years, patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT have greatly benefited from the deeper understanding of the HLA system and particularly from high-resolution definition of HLA class I and HLA class II transplantation antigens [7]. Donor-recipient HLA matching at the allelic level is required for the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Furthermore, population-specific high-resolution HLA haplotype frequency distributions not only facilitate individual donor searches but also determine the chance with which a particular patient can find fully matched donors in a registry [810].

The Chinese Bone Marrow Donor Program (CMDP) manages countrywide unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor recruitment, maintenance and clinical utilities. It has 31 active provincial branch registry networks. By the end of 2013, the CMDP had enlisted 1.83 million potential HSCT donors and facilitated more than 3,900 HSCT donations including 133 for patients beyond Mainland China. Due to the high HLA diversity in the Chinese population, many patients in need of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant are still currently unable to find fully matched donors at the five loci of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1. Consequently, there are clear needs to increase the diversity of the donor pool and improve the unrelated donor search strategies. Beginning in 2009, the CMDP performed the HLA typing of a certain percentage of newly recruited volunteers at the high-resolution level (two fields). As HLA typing techniques have evolved [11,12], the CMDP has accumulated a large data set of high-resolution HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 typing. Over the last ten years, numerous papers have been published about HLA allele and haplotype distributions in the Chinese population. However, in those studies, the recruited potential donors were most frequently from only one or several provinces [1324] or from several ethnic populations [2534]. Until now, no one has explored the regional differences and characteristics of HLA diversity at the allele level across the entire country.

There are 1.37 billion people living in China who account for one fifth of the total population of the world [35]. The population distribution is extremely uneven across the vast territory of China [36]. Moreover, the Chinese population consists of 56 ethnic groups, the largest of which is the Han Chinese, which constitutes approximately 91.51% of the total population [35], and the ethnic minorities account for approximately 8.49% of the total population according to the Sixth National Population Census of the People’s Republic of China (2010, November) [35]. Therefore, China has an abundant, complicated and valuable resource of human genetic diversity.

Our study is the first attempt to analyze high-resolution HLA diversity in China at the countrywide scale; we covered 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. Our primary goal in this initial study was to determine the regional differences and characteristics of HLA diversities across seven geographical regions of China. Our results might be useful for strategic planning of donor recruitment in China, for population genetics research, and for anthropological and disease association studies.

Results

HLA allele frequencies

The numbers of observed alleles for the different HLA genes were 191 for HLA-A, 244 for HLA-B, 146 for HLA-C, 143 for HLA-DRB1 and 47 for HLA-DQB1, which accounted for 6.98% for HLA-A, 7.06% for HLA-B, 6.46% for HLA-C, 9.11% for HLA-DRB1 and 7.91% for HLA-DQB1, respectively, in the IMGT/HLA Database release 3.16 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ipd/imgt/hla/stats.html) (Table 1). The allele frequencies are displayed in S1S5 Tables. The greatest allelic diversity occurs for HLA-B, and the least diversity is present in HLA-DQB1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Numbers of HLA alleles observed in 169,995 Chinese individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t001

The three most common alleles for each of the five loci were as follows: A*11:01 (21.143%), A*24:02 (15.569%), and A*02:01 (12.290%); B*46:01 (10.221%), B*40:01 (9.956%) and B*58:01 (5.869%); C*01:02 (15.558%), C*07:02 (15.152%) and C*03:04 (9.957%); DRB1*09:01 (14.317%), DRB1*15:01 (11.652%) and DRB1*07:01 (8.911%); and DQB1*03:01 (21.094%), DQB1*03:03 (15.703%) and DQB1*06:01(10.183%) (S1S5 Tables). These results are similar to those from our previous small-scale data reported by Hei et al. [17].

Hardy-Weinberg exact tests were performed on each of the five loci. The corresponding p values were 0.1948, 0.1412, 0.3952, 0.0807, and 0.0036 for the HLA-A, HLA-C, HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 genes, respectively. The only significant deviation was observed for the DQB1 locus (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests for the HLA-A, -C, -B, -DRB1, and -DQB1 loci in 169,995 Chinese individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t002

Common and well-documented alleles (CWD)

The alleles observed in our study were segregated into three categories based on the criteria described by Mack et al. [37]: common alleles (C), well-documented alleles (WD), and rare alleles (R). Totals of 41.4%, 54.5%, 46.6%, 52.4%, and 61.7% of the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1 alleles were CWD for the Chinese population (Table 3). Among these CWD alleles, 25, 54, 25, 36, and 16 of the HLA –A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1 alleles, respectively, were common alleles with frequencies greater than 0.001 (Table 3). Totals of 54, 79, 43, 39 and 13 of the HLA –A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles, respectively, were well-documented alleles that were observed in at least five independent, unrelated individuals or in at least three independent, unrelated individuals sharing a haplotype (Table 3). Totals of 112, 111, 78, 68, and 18 for the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1 alleles, respectively, were rare alleles. In the present study, less than 0.2% of the samples contained rare alleles, and more than 99.8% of the individuals carried alleles assigned to CWD category.

thumbnail
Table 3. Numbers of CWD alleles in 169,995 Chinese individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t003

Haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibria

The haplotypes HLA-A-C, HLA-C-B, HLA-DRB1-DQB1, HLA-A-C-B, HLA-A-B-DRB1, HLA-A-C-B-DRB1 and HLA-A-C-B-DRB1-DQB1 were estimated with the EM algorithm using the Arlequin program. Only the haplotypes with frequencies greater than 1‰ are included in S6S9 Tables. The likelihood ratios test for the linkage disequilibrium of HLA-A-C, C-B and DRB1-DQB1 revealed that the vast majority of the pairwise associations were statistically significant (P <0.001; S6 Table).

The most frequent HLA-A-C-B haplotypes were A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01 (54.4‰) followed by A*30:01-C*06:02-B*13:02 (45.4‰), A*33:03-C*03:02-B*58:01 (44.3‰), A*11:01-C*07:02-B* 40:01 (22.9‰), and A*11:01-C*08:01-B*15:02 (22.0‰).

The most common HLA-A-C-B-DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes (S9 Table) with frequencies greater than 10‰ were A*30:01-C*06:02-B*13:02-DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 (37.0‰), A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*09:01-DQB1*03:03 (24.6‰), A*33:03-C*03:02-B*58:01-DRB1*03:01-DQB1*02:01 (24.0‰), A*11:01-C*08:01-B*15:02-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 (11.3‰) and A*33:03-C*03:02-B*58:01-DRB1*13:02-DQB1*06:09 (10.6‰). These five most common HLA-A-C-B-DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes overlapped with the five most frequent HLA-A-B-DRB1 and HLA-A-C-B-DRB1 haplotypes with frequencies greater than 10‰.

Regional distributions of several allelic categories

China can be traditionally divided into seven geographical regions, i.e., Northeast China (NE), North China (NC), Northwest China (NW), East China (EC), Central China (CC), South China (SC), and Southwest China (SW), from the north to the south (Fig 1). To identify the characteristic distributions of the HLA diversities, regional partitioning was performed based on the seven geographical regions.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Geographic regions of China. Northeast China (NE), North China (NC), Northwest China (NW), East China (EC), Central China (CC), South China (SC), and Southwest China (SW).

Note: Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau were not included in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.g001

To examine the regional differences in HLA allelic variations, all of the alleles were divided into several categories that included CWD alleles, rare alleles, not-observed alleles, shared-alleles (in all regions) and unique alleles (in only one region) based on observed population allele frequencies for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and-DQB1. Table 4 shows the numbers of alleles in several categories observed in each of the seven regions. The CWD type alleles accounted for 21% to 28% for HLA-A, 32% to 42% for HLA-B, 23% to 32% for HLA-C, 29% to 39% for HLA-DRB1 and 40% to 55% for HLA-DQB1. Among the seven regions, the greatest number of CWD alleles was observed among individuals from East China; however, regarding the average numbers of CWD alleles per 1000 individuals, East China's contribution was the smallest. The numbers of shared alleles in all of the seven regions were 47 (24.6%) for HLA-A, 90 (36.9%) for HLA-B, 42 (28.8%) for HLA-C, 51 (35.7%) for HLA-DRB1 and 23 (48.9%) for HLA-DQB1. Moreover, these unique alleles observed in each of the seven regions were extreme rare; they were present in fewer, 0.04% of the observed individuals.

thumbnail
Table 4. Numbers of HLA alleles according to several categories observed in the seven geographic regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t004

Characteristics and regional differences in five-locus haplotypes

To further characterize the regional differences in HLA variation, we compared the distributions of the A-C-B-DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes in seven regions in detail. First, we compared the top 20 most common haplotypes in each region (Table 5), and a graphical representation of this comparison is shown in Fig 2. Second, in order to confirm the regionally specific haplotypes, we analyzed the frequencies of the 100 most common haplotypes among the regions. Regionally specific haplotypes were defined as haplotypes with frequencies in one region that were at least two times higher than those in all other regions.

thumbnail
Table 5. Occurrences of the first 20 HLA A-C-B-DRB1-DQB1 frequency-ranked haplotypes for each region in each of the other geographic regions of China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t005

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distributions of the 20 most common HLA five-locus haplotypes in the seven geographic regions of China.

(A) China; (B) Northeast China (NE); (C) North China (NC); (D) Northwest China (NW); (E) East China (EC); (F) Central China (CC); (G) South China (SC); (H) Southwest China (SW).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.g002

Among the 20 most common haplotypes, the 169,995 individuals exhibited quite different frequencies in the different regions. Some haplotypes were more common in the NE, NC and NW regions than in the SC and SW regions; e.g., A*30:01-C*06:02-B*13:02-DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 (the 1st haplotype) and A*02:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 (the 10th haplotype). The frequencies of these haplotypes in the seven regions decreased gradually from northeast to southwest. In contrast, some other haplotypes exhibited gradually decreasing frequencies from south to north and from west to east; for example, the 4th haplotype (A*11:01-C*08:01-B*15:02-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01) and the 9th haplotype (A*11:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:01) (Table 5, Fig 2). Additionally, A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*14:54-DQB1*05:02 (the 18th haplotype) was predominant in the SC and SW regions with frequencies that were 2- to 13- fold greater than those in other five regions (Table 5). The frequencies of the 18th haplotype also sequentially decreased from southwest to northeast (S11 Table). Furthermore, the 20th haplotype A*02:03-C*07:02-B*38:02-DRB1*16:02- DQB1*05:02 was the most frequent (10.11%) in the SC region, where it was approximately 2.7 to 8.8 times more frequent than in all of the other six regions (Table 5, Figs 2 and 3). The 19th haplotype A*11:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 was the sole haplotype that exhibited similar frequencies in all seven regions.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Distinctive HLA five-locus haplotypes in Southwest China and South China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.g003

Among the 100 most common haplotypes in the 169,995 donors, we identified nine region-specific haplotypes in one or two to three contiguous regions. Figs 3 and 4 show the geographic distributions of nine region-specific haplotypes. First, A*02:03-C*07:02-B*38:02-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 (the 20th haplotype), A*11:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 (the 31st haplotype) and A*24:02-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:01 (the 81st haplotype) were predominant in the SC region with frequencies of approximately 10.11‰, 7.71‰ and 3.91‰, respectively. These haplotypes were 2.7 to 13.1 times more frequent than in the other six regions (Figs 3 and 4A–4C, and S11 Table). Second, A*24:02-C*04:03-B*15:25-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 (the 68th haplotype), A*02:03-C*07:02-B*52:01-DRB1*14:04-DQB1*05:03 (the 79th haplotype) and A*11:01-C*12:03-B*15:32-DRB1*15:04-DQB1*05:02 (the 95th haplotype) were predominant in the SW region with frequencies of approximately 7.9‰, 5.11‰, and 4.05‰, respectively (Figs 3 and 4D–4F, and S11 Table). Third, A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*14:54- DQB1*05:02 (the 18th haplotype) was predominant in the SC and SW regions (Fig 4G), while A*02:01-C*03:03-B*15:11-DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:02 (the 94th haplotype) was relatively common in the NE and NC regions but rare in the SC and SW regions (Fig 4H, S11 Table). Finally, A*02:05-C*06:02-B*50:01-DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 (the 40th haplotype) was common in the NW, NC and NE and less common in the other four regions. The difference was highly significant (2 times to 5 times; Fig 4I, S11 Table). Additionally, no predominant haplotype was observed in either the EC or CC region.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Different distributions of region-specific HLA five-locus haplotypes in the seven geographic regions of China.

A: A*02:03-C*07:02-B*38:02-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 haplotype (the 20th haplotype); B: A*11:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 haplotype (the 31st haplotype); C: A*24:02-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:01 haplotype (the 81st haplotype); D: A*24:02-C*04:03-B*15:25-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 haplotype (the 68th haplotype); E: A*02:03-C*07:02-B*52:01-DRB1*14:04-DQB1*05:03 haplotype (the 79th haplotype); F: A*11:01-C*12:03-B*15:32-DRB1*15:04-DQB1*05:02 haplotype (the 95th haplotype); G: A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*14:54-DQB1*05:02 haplotype (the 18th haplotype); H: A*02:01-C*03:03-B*15:11-DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:02 haplotype (the 94th haplotype); I: A*02:05-C*06:02-B*50:01-DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 haplotype (the 40th haplotype).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.g004

Verification the probabilities of HLA matching within and between geographic regions of China

In regard to HLA matching probability within and between geographic regions of China, the highest probability was observed within the SC region, almost 1.44 to 3.93 times higher than within all of the other six regions (S12 Table, Table 6). Furthermore, the matching probabilities within each region decreased from south to north. There were all high matching rates within the southern respective regions (the SC and SW regions) whereas medium or low-level matching rate within the northern respective regions (the NW, NC and NE regions). The matching rates between southern and northern regions were either medium or low. The lowest matching rate was observed between the NE region and the SW region. Additionally, high or medium-level HLA matching rates were observed between the EC region and any one of other six regions. The similar phenomenon was also discovered between the CC region and any one of other six regions (Table 6).

thumbnail
Table 6. HLA Matching within and between populations from each of the seven regions of China (matching rates).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.t006

Discussion

Our study provides high-resolution HLA allele and haplotype frequencies of the Chinese population based on a data set of 169,995 individuals. This study is the first to analyze such a large nationwide dataset that covered 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. Compared to the previous studies [1334], our data has significantly expanded the numbers of alleles observed at the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 loci and the numbers of haplotypes in China.

We identified 156 HLA alleles as “common” alleles and 228 as “well-documented” alleles, according to the updated criteria clarified by Mack SJ [37]. There was a discrepancy between the HLA CWD alleles observed in our study and the CWD 2.0.0 alleles reported by Mack SJ. For example, A*74:02, B*15:19, C*03:56 and DQB1*05:10 are well documented in Chinese individuals but are out of the CWD 2.0.0 catalogues. Conversely, A*24:17, B*15:30, C*15:09, DRB1*01:03 and DQB1*02:03 are rare in Chinese individuals, however are common alleles within the CWD 2.0.0 catalogue [37]. These results suggest that the distributions of HLA polymorphisms are region specific and race specific. HLA data at the level of a specific population or an ethic group are important as a result of the differentiation in HLA frequencies that has occurred among human population migrations. We will discuss these differences further in other paper. Furthermore, we divided China into the seven geographic regions and were able to identify HLA alleles that were uniquely common in a single region while virtually absent from other regions. The rise and maintenance of region-specific HLA polymorphisms might be the consequences of local evolutionary selection pressure and geographic barriers. Any novel alleles might have been positively selected to enlarge the peptide-binding repertoire to counter environmental challenges. Additionally, some HLA alleles might have relatively short evolutionary histories and might be confined to regional populations, because of geographic barriers.

To analyze the regional differences in HLA genetic diversity, seven geographic regions were used for regional partitioning (Fig 1), rather than a division into southern and northern China for the following reasons. The boundary between northern China and southern China is generally believed to be the Huai River-Qin Mountains Line. However, this boundary seems to be ambiguous. First, it does not follow provincial boundaries; it cuts through Shaanxi, Henan, Anhui, and Jiangsu provinces. Second, the region around Nanyang city, Henan province, lies in the gap in which the Qin has ended and the Huai River has not yet begun. Third, central Anhui and Jiangsu lie south of the Huai River but north of the Yangtze River, which makes their classifications ambiguous as well. Moreover, the Yangtze River is also believed to be the boundary between southern and northern China by some scholars [38]. Additionally, historical population migration might also blur the boundary between northern and southern China. For example, the Song dynasty (A.D.960-1279) was established in Kaifeng, Henan province (Northern China); later, the capital city was moved to Hangzhou, Zhejiang province (Southern China) because of invasions of Jurchens and Mongols. During Song Dynasty, decades of warfare caused a massive migration from northern to southern China. Obviously, it is difficult to distinguish volunteers with southern origins from those with northern origins in the provinces of Henan, Shaanxi, Jiangsu, and Anhui. At the same time, it is extremely complicated to compare the regional differences among the 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities based on a large dataset. Our intention was to perform a preliminary analysis of the regional distributions of HLA diversity based on the traditional seven geographic regions of China. Furthermore, HLA diversity studies at the provincial or even local city level will be discussed in a follow-up paper.

Among the most common five-locus haplotypes, A*30:01-C*06:02-B*13:02-DRB1*07:01-DQB1*02:02 (the 1st haplotype), A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*09:01-DQB1*03:03 (the 2nd haplotype) and A*33:03-C*03:02-B*58:01-DRB1*03:01-DQB1*02:01 (the 3rd haplotype) covered the most frequent five-locus haplotypes of the seven regions. Moreover, the 1st haplotype was the most common in Northeast China (4.81%), and was also reported with a higher frequency of 2.68% in Korean [39], which lies adjacent to Northeast China. Korean and Northeast Chinese might have shared genetic origins. In contrast, the 2nd and 3rd haplotypes were predominant in Southern China (South China: 3.39%, 4.62%), which are similar to the finding of previous report [16]. Additionally, the 2nd and 3rd haplotypes are relatively common in Vietnam [40] with frequencies of 2.0% and 3.5%, respectively, and most frequent in Northeast Thais (3.4%, 4.6%) [41]. The 3rd haplotype were also reported in Italian and Turkish living in Germany, with lower frequencies of 0.29% and 0.25% [42,43]. These observations support the hypothesis that the southern population in East Asia (including the Southern Chinese populations) and Southeast Asia might have the same ancestors [44].

As described in the results, nine of the HLA five-locus haplotypes exhibited the following clear regional characteristics (Figs 3 and 4): 1. some haplotypes displayed a decreasing pattern from the southwest to the northeast or the opposite pattern, such as the 18th and 94th haplotypes; 2. some haplotypes seemed to be a decreasing pattern from south to north, or exhibit the opposite direction, such as the 20th and 40th haplotypes; 3. some haplotypes were identified as region-specific haplotypes with frequencies that were extremely high only in a single region, such as the 20th, 31st, 81st, 68th, 79th, and 95th haplotypes; and 4. some haplotypes exhibited wider regional characteristics and had relatively higher frequencies in several adjacent regions, such as the 18th, 94th, and 40th haplotypes.

Among these distinctive haplotypes, A*02:03-C*07:02-B*38:02-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 (the 20th haplotype), which was identified as one of South China- specific haplotype (1.01%) in the present study, has also been reported in southern Chinese Han population (0.54%) [16] and in mixed of northern and southern Chinese Han individuals (0.55%) [45]. These findings suggest that the 20th haplotype is prominent in southern China. Moreover, A*24:02-C*04:03-B*15:25-DRB1*12:02-DQB1*03:01 (the 68th haplotype), one of Southwest China-specific haplotypes identified in this study, has also been reported in Vietnam [40], with a higher frequency of 1.1%. Obviously, the frequency of this haplotype in Vietnam is similar to that in Southwest China (0.79%), supporting the hypothesis that populations from the south China and Vietnamese might derive from the similar origins. The 68th haplotype might be a significant haplotype unique for some Southeast-Asia and East-Asia regions including Vietnam, and Southwest China. Additionally, the 20th haplotype and A*02:03-C*07:02-B*52:01-DRB1*14:04-DQB1*05:03 (the 79th haplotype), another Southwest China-specific haplotype identified in our study, have also been observed in Asians living in the United State with frequencies of 0.325%, 0.108%, respectively [46], similar to those in the EC region observed in the present study, while A*11:01-C*03:04-B*13:01-DRB1*16:02-DQB1*05:02 (the 31st haplotype), another South China-specific haplotypes observed in our study, has also been discovered in Asians and Hispanics living in America, with frequencies of 0.108%, 0.156%, respectively [46], similar to the frequency in the Northwest China (0.12%) observed in our study (S11 Table). The Asian populations in the NMDP registry are very heterogeneous populations, while our population in each of the regions is a quite homogeneous.

A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*14:54-DQB1*05:02 (the 18th haplotype) was identified as one region-specific haplotype of SW and SC regions, with frequencies of 1.01% and 0.75%, respectively. The 18th haplotype has not been previously reported, which is likely due to the fact that the earlier HLA typing did not distinguish DRB1*14:01 from DRB1*14:54 in most laboratories. As a result, DRB1*14:54 is not reported in the majority of references [1417,19,3941,45]. DRB1*14:01:01 differed from DRB1*14:54 in one nucleotide of the exon 3 region, which results in an amino acid change [47]. Ambiguous results are caused by the genotyping of only the second exon of HLA-DRB1 locus. To distinguish DRB1*14:54 from DRB1*14:01 and to investigate the distribution of DRB1*14:54, we sequenced exon 3 of the DRB1 locus in the individuals involved. The frequency of DRB1*14:54 (3.20%) was far higher than that of DRB1*14:01 (0.005%) in our studied population. Additionally DRB1*14:54 was relatively predominant in the Southwest (5.26%) and South China regions (4.56%), which is similar to previous results [23,24,48,49]. While A*02:07-C*01:02-B*46:01-DRB1*14:01-DQB1*05:02 haplotype was found as expected in the southern Chinese Han population with a higher frequency of 1.08% as published by Gao SQ [16], these authors did not identify the DRB1*14:54. The frequency distribution of this haplotype is similar to that of the 18th haplotype in the South (0.75%) and Southwest China (1.01%) regions in the present study. To the best of our knowledge, the 40th, 81st, 94th, and 95th haplotypes, other four region-specific haplotypes identified in the present study, have not been previously reported.

Furthermore, some alleles were found in multiple regions that had different distinctive haplotypic associations, which suggest that these alleles might be ancient and might have diverged through recombination at different times in different regions to generate new haplotypes. For example, A*02:03 was observed in both the 20th haplotype (the distinctive haplotype of the SC region) and the 79th haplotype (the distinctive haplotype of the SW region). A*02:03 exhibited the higher frequencies in South china (7.7%) and Southwest China (5.5%). Besides, its frequencies decreased gradually from south to north. This allele was most frequent in Guangxi province (11.2%), followed by Guangdong province (7.4%), and Yunnan province (6.2%) in the present study (data not shown); these percentages are similar to those reported in the literature [15,16,26,27,29,30,3234]. A*02:03 has also been observed to have lower frequencies in German (0.011%) [10], Japan (0.1%) [50] and South Korea (0.55%) [39,51], and to have medium frequencies in Malaysia (2%-4%) [52] and Indonesia Java (3.6%) [53]. Whereas A*02:03 were predominant in the Northeast Thailand [41] and Vietnam[40], with higher frequencies of 10.6%, 7.9%, respectively, which are in close proximity to Southwest China and South China. It has been suggested that A*02:03 expanded dramatically in the southeast region of Asia including Thailand, Vietnam and the south parts of China after early humans settled in Southeast Asia. Additionally, A*02:03 is known to be serologically different from other common A*02 alleles such as A*02:01. It is reasonable to hypothesize that the rise of A*02:03 in that region might have played a critical role in adapting to the new environment by increasing the peptide binding reservoir or by other means. As a consequence of the A*02:03 expansion, new haplotypes associated with A*02:03 were established.

Our results revealed that several characteristic haplotypes were primarily located in southern China (the Southwest China and South China regions) and northern China (the Northwest, Northeast, and North China regions). Meanwhile, we also found that the HLA matching rates were higher within the southern respective regions (the SC and SW regions) than within the northern respective regions (the NW, NC and NE regions). Additionally, the low-level HLA matching rates were primarily observed between the northern regions and the southern regions. These findings support the hypothesis that the Chinese Nation comprises two distinct populations of the north and south. This hypothesis agrees well with previous studies [38,44,54]. In contrast, no region-specific haplotypes were observed in the Central China or East China regions. Moreover, high HLA matching rates were observed not only between the EC region and the southern respective regions (the SC and SW regions) but also between the EC region and the northern respective regions (the NC and NE regions). The similar phenomenon was also discovered in the CC region. These regions (the EC and CC regions) cover provinces that are crossed by the traditional border between southern and northern China; i.e., the Huai River-Qin Mountain Line. It has been suggested that residents of these regions might possess characteristics of both North and South Chinese. That is to say, HLA diversities of the EC and CC region’s population may cover those of majorities of northern and southern Chinese. Consequently, it may be worth to consider expanding marrow donor pool in these regions to further improve coverage of HLA diversity throughout China.

Our results regarding the HLA matching rates also showed that the highest probability was observed within the SC region and the matching probabilities within each region decreased from south to north. It suggests that SC region population are less HLA polymorphic than other regions’ population. Additionally, the low-level matching rates were primarily observed between the northern regions and the southern regions (the SW region). These differences in HLA matching rates between regions may be due to differences in nationality composition, ancestry and shift and migration of the population of each geographic region. Based on the HLA matching rates within each region or between different regions (Table 6) we can estimate the relative likelihood to find a perfect donor for a particular patient from a given region. Further research is needed to explore how the differences in HLA matching rates impact on the search of potential bone marrow donors within each Chinese region.

In the present study, the proportions of Han Chinese in the seven regions were 84.5% to 99.5%. Obviously, the Han Chinese population is a predominant population in all studied regions, while the individuals of minority nationalities account for less than 6 percent of the observed individuals. Additionally, the southern minorities are more closely related to the southern Han Chinese, while the northern minorities and northern Han Chinese group together, according to the clustering analysis published by Chen [54]. Accordingly, minority nationalities might have no influence on the major conclusion of the present studies.

The HLA system is known to have been under strong selection for thousands of years due to its important role in the immune response, and the HLA haplotype is a useful genetic marker for the identification of closely related population groups, because each characteristic haplotype is considered to have a single origin [55]. Our results might be useful for studies of origins of nationalities, anthropogenesis, and population genetics.

In conclusion, we preliminarily described and analyzed characteristics and regional differences of HLA diversity distributions based on 169,995 Chinese individuals who were typed at high resolution for the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 genes. Although the individuals from each of the geographic regions shared certain common alleles and haplotypes, the populations residing in Southwest and South China maintained their distinctive genetic characteristics. These findings suggest that selective recruitment of stem cell donors with characteristic human leukocyte alleles and haplotypes is necessary. Furthermore, the HLA diversity analysis of seven geographic regions may provide meaningful tools to optimize the new marrow donor recruitment strategy and donor search strategy.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the review board of the China Marrow Donor Program, Beijing, China. All patients provided written informed consent.

Sample population

Our analysis consisted of 169,995 healthy individuals from CMDP volunteers, who were recruited from January 2010 to January 2012. All volunteers were recruited at local CMDP recruitment centers throughout 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities (i.e., Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Shanghai, Shandong, Jiangsu, Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Chongqing, Tibet, Yunnan, Sichuan, and Guizhou). Upon recruitment, volunteers were asked to fulfill personal information including their birthplace. In our study, the individuals were classified according to where they were born. During the recruitment, the individuals who recruited from a province include both the native-born (85%) and immigrants (15%). All volunteers were 18 to 50 years old, and males (47.2%) and females (52.8%) were included. Among the 169,995 volunteers, 94.6% were Han Chinese and 5.4% were minority Chinese.

HLA genotyping

All of the individuals were typed at high-resolution levels for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and-DQB1. High-resolution HLA typings were performed using two methods: next-generation high-throughput sequence based typing (NGS, n = 117,993), and Sanger sequencing-based typing (SBT, n = 52,002). HLA typing was performed by the CMDP-accredited laboratories. The alleles were generally given in a two-field form, and ambiguities within the relevant exons were resolved with group-specific sequencing primers (GSSP) or high resolution sequence specific primers (SSP). Additionally, alleles with synonymous mutations inside or outside the relevant exons were merged. Examples are as follows: A*01:01:01:01 and A*01:01:02 (not identical within exons 2 and 3) were merged to A*01:01, and A*32:01:01 and A*32:01:02 (identical within exons 2 and 3) were merged to A*32:01. However, alleles that differed in nonsynonymous mutations outside the relevant exons were not yet merged. For example, A*02:03 and A*02:253 (identical within exons 2 and 3) had to be identified by sequencing exon 4.

Based on SBT method, exons 2, 3 and 4 were sequenced for HLA-A, -B, and HLA-C, exon 2 was sequenced for HLA-DRB1, and exons 2 and 3 were sequenced for HLA-DQB1. Based on NGS based typing method, exons 1 to 7 were sequenced for HLA-A, -B and HLA-C, exon 2 was sequenced for HLA-DRB1, and exons 2 and 3 were sequenced for HLA-DQB1. Briefly, next-generation clonal sequencing of the exonic amplicons was performed using a reliable, cost-effective and high-throughput sequence-based typing (RCHSBT) method [11]. High-resolution sequencing to obtain HLA genotypes was performed as described in detail earlier [11].

Criteria for CWD alleles

In this study, the criteria of Mack SJ et al. were adopted [37]. Common alleles were those that have been observed at frequencies >0.001 in reference populations of at least 1500 individuals [37,56]. Alleles detected five times via SBT in unrelated individuals or those that were detected three times via SBT in unrelated individuals sharing a haplotype were assigned to the well-documented category [37]. The remaining alleles were considered rare alleles [56].

Geographic partitioning

Traditionally from the north to the south, China can be divided into seven geographical regions (Fig 1). These partitions are as follows: Northeast China (NE) includes Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning; North China (NC) consists of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, and Inner Mongolia; Northwest China (NW) is comprised of Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, and Shaanxi; East China (EC) comprises Shanghai, Shandong, Jiangsu, Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, and Fujian; Central China (CC) has three provinces, including Henan, Hubei, Hunan; South China (SC) covers Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan; and Southwest China (SW) is made up of Chongqing, Tibet, Yunnan, Sichuan, Guizhou. Additionally, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau were not included in this study.

To identify the characteristic distributions of the HLA diversities, regional partitioning was performed based on the seven geographical regions. We used the geographical regions partitioning to group 169,995 unrelated volunteers from 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities into seven groups, i.e., Northeast China (NE, n = 12,493), North China (NC, n = 27,819), Northwest China (NW, n = 14,409), East China (EC, n = 51,132), Central China (CC, n = 24,432), South China (SC, n = 18,657) and Southwest China (SW, n = 21,053) (S10 Table). Furthermore, the proportions of Han Chinese people in each region were as follows: 99.5% (EC), 96.5% (CC), 95.4% (NE), 94.2% (NW), 92.9% (NC), 92.3% (SC), and 84.5% (SW).

According to the 2010 National Population Census [35], the population of China was approximately 1.34 billion (not including the population in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region and the Taiwan province). The total populations of each of the seven geographic regions were as follows: approximately 109.5 million people in Northeast China, 96.6 million people in Northwest China, 164.8 million people in North China, 392.9 million people in East China, 216.9 million people in Central China, 159.0 million people in South China and 192.9 million people in Southwest China. Consequently, the research samples of each region observed in this study accounted for approximately 0.11 ‰ to 0.17 ‰ of the total populations of the respective regions (S10 Table).

Statistical analysis

The allele frequencies were calculated by direct counting, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests (heterozygosity and p value) were performed for each of the five HLA loci using the Arlequin software package [57]. The input parameters for the Markov Chain Monte Carlo test described by Guo and Thompson [58] were 106 Markov chain steps and 2*103 dememorization steps. Values of p <0.05 were regarded as significant.

The haplotype frequencies were estimated with the expected maximum likelihood estimation algorithm with the Arlequin software [57]. Furthermore, linkage disequilibrium was also calculated for two-locus haplotypes.

The pairwise comparisons were carried out using Cervus 3.0.7 software [59,60], and a 10/10 alleles at high resolution level for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 was used as matching criteria. The matching rate was calculated in Winpepi 11.44 [60,61], and the odds ratio and chi-square were calculated using SPSS 16.0.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. HLA-A allele frequencies among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. HLA-B allele frequencies among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. HLA-C allele frequencies among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. HLA-DRB1 allele frequencies among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Table. HLA-DQB1 allele frequencies among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Common (F-est.>1‰) HLA two-locus haplotypes among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s006

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Common (freq.>1‰) HLA three-locus haplotypes among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s007

(DOCX)

S8 Table. Common (freq.>1‰) HLA four-locus haplotypes among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s008

(DOCX)

S9 Table. Common (freq.>1‰) HLA five-locus haplotypes among the 169,995 CMDP registry donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s009

(DOCX)

S10 Table. The numbers of donors from each of the geographic regions of China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s010

(DOCX)

S11 Table. Frequencies of several distinctive haplotypes in each of the geographic regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s011

(DOCX)

S12 Table. HLA matches within each region of China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139485.s012

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Red Cross Society of China. The Chinese Marrow Donor Program (CMDP) is a non-profit organization under the guidance of the Red Cross Society of China. CMDP’s mission is to regulate and administer marrow donor recruitment, human leukocyte antigen typing and marrow transplantation for genetically matched donors in China. We want to thank the leadership of the Red Cross Society of China and the CMDP for their long time support in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JPC ZXZ XYZ. Performed the experiments: XYZ FMZ JPL WM DMZ MLL ALH DPD PJ XYS BWZ CFZ JS ZHD ZLW WJY QC YHQ XMZ RL GYL GLL HCL XZ BP LXJ GS YL ZHF YPS ZXX WYD YQJ XL MZZ HLF XJL DD QL YH. Analyzed the data: JPC ZXZ XYZ FMZ JPL WM DMZ MLL ALH DPD PJ XYS BWZ CFZ JS ZHD ZLW WJY QC YHQ XMZ RL GYL GLL HCL XZ BP LXJ GS YL ZHF YPS ZXX WYD YQJ XL MZZ HLF XJL DD QL YH ZXZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XYZ HLF XJL ZXZ JPC. Wrote the paper: XYZ JPC.

References

  1. 1. Marrack P, Kappler J (1986) The antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted receptor on T cells. Adv Immunol 38: 1–30. pmid:3083653
  2. 2. Marrack P, Bender J, Jordan M, Rees W, Robertson J, Schaefer BC, et al. (2001) Major histocompatibility complex proteins and TCRs: do they really go together like a horse and carriage? J Immunol 167: 617–621. pmid:11441061
  3. 3. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Aljurf M, Pasquini MC, Bouzas LF, Yoshimi A, et al. (2010) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective. JAMA 303: 1617–1624. pmid:20424252
  4. 4. Copelan EA (2006) Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 354: 1813–1826. pmid:16641398
  5. 5. Ayala E, Tomblyn M (2011) Hematopoietic cell transplantation for lymphomas. Cancer Control 18: 246–257. pmid:21976243
  6. 6. Lucarelli G, Isgro A, Sodani P, Gaziev J (2012) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia and sickle cell anemia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2: a011825. pmid:22553502
  7. 7. Lee SJ, Klein J, Haagenson M, Baxter-Lowe LA, Confer DL, Eapen M, et al. (2007) High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood 110: 4576–4583. pmid:17785583
  8. 8. Kollman C, Abella E, Baitty RL, Beatty PG, Chakraborty R, Christiansen CL, et al. (2004) Assessment of optimal size and composition of the U.S. National Registry of hematopoietic stem cell donors. Transplantation 78: 89–95. pmid:15257044
  9. 9. Schmidt AH, Sauter J, Pingel J, Ehninger G (2014) Toward an optimal global stem cell donor recruitment strategy. PLoS One 9: e86605. pmid:24497958
  10. 10. Schmidt AH, Baier D, Solloch UV, Stahr A, Cereb N, Wassmuth R, et al. (2009) Estimation of high-resolution HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 allele and haplotype frequencies based on 8862 German stem cell donors and implications for strategic donor registry planning. Hum Immunol 70: 895–902. pmid:19683023
  11. 11. Cao H, Wang Y, Zhang W, Chai X, Zhang X, Chen S, et al. (2013) A short-read multiplex sequencing method for reliable, cost-effective and high-throughput genotyping in large-scale studies. Hum Mutat 34: 1715–1720. pmid:24014314
  12. 12. Erlich H (2012) HLA DNA typing: past, present, and future. Tissue Antigens 80: 1–11. pmid:22651253
  13. 13. Yan C, Wang R, Li J, Deng Y, Wu D, Zhang H, et al. (2003) HLA-A gene polymorphism defined by high-resolution sequence-based typing in 161 Northern Chinese Han people. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 1: 304–309. pmid:15629059
  14. 14. Yang G, Deng YJ, Hu SN, Wu DY, Li SB, Zhu J, et al. (2006) HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 polymorphism defined by sequence-based typing of the Han population in Northern China. Tissue Antigens 67: 146–152. pmid:16441486
  15. 15. Trachtenberg E, Vinson M, Hayes E, Hsu YM, Houtchens K, Erlich H, et al. (2007) HLA class I (A, B, C) and class II (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1) alleles and haplotypes in the Han from southern China. Tissue Antigens 70: 455–463. pmid:17900288
  16. 16. Gao SQ, Zou HY, Cheng LH, Jing SZ, Deng ZH (2009) [Analysis on haplotypes of five HLA loci in southern Chinese Han population by sequence-based typing]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 26: 228–232. pmid:19350523
  17. 17. Hei AL, Li W, Deng ZH, He J, Jin WM, Du D, et al. (2009) Analysis of high-resolution HLA-A, -B, -Cw, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles and haplotypes in 718 Chinese marrow donors based on donor-recipient confirmatory typings. Int J Immunogenet 36: 275–282. pmid:19674163
  18. 18. Yao Y, Shi L, Shi L, Matsushita M, Yu L, Lin K, et al. (2009) Distribution of HLA-A, -B, -Cw, and -DRB1 alleles and haplotypes in an isolated Han population in Southwest China. Tissue Antigens 73: 561–568. pmid:19493233
  19. 19. Li Y, He J, Bao XJ, Qiu QC, Yuan XN, Xu C, et al. (2011) [A study on allele frequencies and mismatching proportion of HLA-A, B, Cw, DRB1 and DQB1 on high-resolution donor-recipient typing in Chinese Han population]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 28: 92–98. pmid:21287519
  20. 20. He J, Li Y, Bao X, Qiu Q, Yuan X, Xu C, et al. (2012) Common and well-documented (CWD) alleles of human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 loci for the Chinese Han population do not quite correlate with the ASHI CWD alleles. Hum Immunol 73: 61–66. pmid:21712058
  21. 21. Pan M, Zhao X, Pan QQ, Fan S, Wang XY, Wang CY, et al. (2012) [Study on the analysis of high-resolution HLA-A,B and DRB1 alleles from 3238 hematopoietic stem cell donors in Jiangsu Han Chinese]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 33: 94–97. pmid:22730655
  22. 22. Hong W, Fu Y, Chen S, Wang F, Ren X, Xu A (2005) Distributions of HLA class I alleles and haplotypes in Northern Han Chinese. Tissue Antigens 66: 297–304. pmid:16185325
  23. 23. Pan QQ, Fan S, Wang XY, Pan M, Zhao X, Zhou XY, et al. (2011) The distribution of human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, and -DRB1 alleles and haplotypes based on high-resolution genotyping of 167 families from Jiangsu Province, China. Hum Immunol 72: 872–876. pmid:21762744
  24. 24. Zou HY JS, Li Z, Lan YX, Bao ZQ, et al. (2010) [study on allelic and haplotypic polymorphism of human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, -DRB1 genes at high-resolution level in Northern Chinese Han hematopoietic hematopoietic stem cell donor]. International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Hematology 33: 103–108.
  25. 25. Shi L, Xu SB, Ohashi J, Sun H, Yu JK, Huang XQ, et al. (2006) HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 alleles and haplotypes in Naxi and Han populations in southwestern China (Yunnan province). Tissue Antigens 67: 38–44. pmid:16451199
  26. 26. Chen S, Hu Q, Xie Y, Zhou L, Xiao C, Wu Y, et al. (2007) Origin of Tibeto-Burman speakers: evidence from HLA allele distribution in Lisu and Nu inhabiting Yunnan of China. Hum Immunol 68: 550–559. pmid:17509456
  27. 27. Shi L, Ogata S, Yu JK, Ohashi J, Yu L, Shi L, et al. (2008) Distribution of HLA alleles and haplotypes in Jinuo and Wa populations in Southwest China. Hum Immunol 69: 58–65. pmid:18295677
  28. 28. Shen CM, Zhu BF, Deng YJ, Ye SH, Yan JW, Yang G, et al. (2010) Allele polymorphism and haplotype diversity of HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 loci in sequence-based typing for Chinese Uyghur ethnic group. PLoS One 5: e13458. pmid:21079793
  29. 29. Zhu BF, Yang G, Shen CM, Qin HX, Liu SZ, Deng YJ, et al. (2010) Distributions of HLA-A and -B alleles and haplotypes in the Yi ethnic minority of Yunnan, China: relationship to other populations. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 11: 127–135. pmid:20104647
  30. 30. Shi L, Huang XQ, Shi L, Tao YF, Yao YF, Yu L, et al. (2011) HLA polymorphism of the Zhuang population reflects the common HLA characteristics among Zhuang-Dong language-speaking populations. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 12: 428–435. pmid:21634035
  31. 31. Yao Y, Shi L, Tao Y, Kulski JK, Lin K, Huang X, et al. (2012) Distinct HLA allele and haplotype distributions in four ethnic groups of China. Tissue Antigens 80: 452–461. pmid:23020309
  32. 32. Shi L, Shi L, Yao YF, Matsushita M, Yu L, Huang XQ, et al. (2010) Genetic link among Hani, Bulang and other Southeast Asian populations: evidence from HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 genes and haplotypes distribution. Int J Immunogenet 37: 467–475. pmid:20637045
  33. 33. Ogata S, Shi L, Matsushita M, Yu L, Huang XQ, Sun H, et al. (2007) Polymorphisms of human leucocyte antigen genes in Maonan people in China. Tissue Antigens 69: 154–160. pmid:17257318
  34. 34. Shi L, Yao YF, Matsushita M, Yu L, Lin QK, Tao YF, et al. (2010) HLA alleles and haplotypes distribution in Dai population in Yunnan province, Southwest China. Tissue Antigens 75: 159–165. pmid:20003137
  35. 35. China NBOSo (2011) Communiqué of the National Bureau of Statistics of People's Republic of China on Major Figures of the 2010 Population Census(No.1). China Population Today: 19–23.
  36. 36. Zhiming GMF (2010) Classification of densities and characteristics of curve of population centers in China by GIS. Journal of Geographical Sciences 4: 628–640.
  37. 37. Mack SJ, Cano P, Hollenbach JA, He J, Hurley CK, Middleton D, et al. (2013) Common and well-documented HLA alleles: 2012 update to the CWD catalogue. Tissue Antigens 81: 194–203. pmid:23510415
  38. 38. Zhao TM, Zhang GL, Zhu YM, Zheng SQ, Gu WJ, Chen Q, et al. (1991) [Study on immunoglobulin allotypes in the Chinese: a hypothesis of the origin of the Chinese nation]. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 18: 97–108. pmid:1888529
  39. 39. Lee KW, Oh DH, Lee C, Yang SY (2005) Allelic and haplotypic diversity of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 genes in the Korean population. Tissue Antigens 65: 437–447. pmid:15853898
  40. 40. Hoa BK, Hang NT, Kashiwase K, Ohashi J, Lien LT, Horie T, et al. (2008) HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles and haplotypes in the Kinh population in Vietnam. Tissue Antigens 71: 127–134. pmid:18086267
  41. 41. Romphruk AV, Romphruk A, Kongmaroeng C, Klumkrathok K, Paupairoj C, Leelayuwat C (2010) HLA class I and II alleles and haplotypes in ethnic Northeast Thais. Tissue Antigens 75: 701–711. pmid:20230525
  42. 42. Rendine S, Ferrero NM, Sacchi N, Costa C, Pollichieni S, Amoroso A (2012) Estimation of human leukocyte antigen class I and class II high-resolution allele and haplotype frequencies in the Italian population and comparison with other European populations. Hum Immunol 73: 399–404. pmid:22342872
  43. 43. Pingel J, Solloch UV, Hofmann JA, Lange V, Ehninger G, Schmidt AH (2013) High-resolution HLA haplotype frequencies of stem cell donors in Germany with foreign parentage: how can they be used to improve unrelated donor searches? Hum Immunol 74: 330–340. pmid:23200758
  44. 44. Chu JY, Huang W, Kuang SQ, Wang JM, Xu JJ, Chu ZT, et al. (1998) Genetic relationship of populations in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 11763–11768. pmid:9751739
  45. 45. Hei AL LW, Liu N, Deng ZH, Cheng LY, He J, et al. (2009) [Analysis of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1 high resolution haplotype frequencies in Chinese Marrow Donor Program registry]. China J Blood Transfusion 22: 363–367.
  46. 46. Maiers M, Gragert L, Klitz W (2007) High-resolution HLA alleles and haplotypes in the United States population. Hum Immunol 68: 779–788. pmid:17869653
  47. 47. Horn PA, Albis-Camps M, Verboom M, Bunce M, Yousaf K, Williams S, et al. (2007) The nature of diversity of HLA-DRB1 exon 3. Tissue Antigens 70: 335–337. pmid:17767557
  48. 48. Lai MJ, Wen SH, Lin YH, Shyr MH, Lin PY, Yang KL (2010) Distributions of human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, and -DRB1 alleles and haplotypes based on 46,915 Taiwanese donors. Hum Immunol 71: 777–782. pmid:20493227
  49. 49. Gao Su-qing CX, Zou Hong-yan, Cheng Liang-hong, Liang Lu, Deng Zhi-hui (2009) Identification of human leukocyte antigen-DRB1*1454 allele and human leukocyte antigen-DRB1 exon 3 sequence information in the Chinese population. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research 13: 983–987.
  50. 50. Itoh Y, Mizuki N, Shimada T, Azuma F, Itakura M, Kashiwase K, et al. (2005) High-throughput DNA typing of HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci by a PCR-SSOP-Luminex method in the Japanese population. Immunogenetics 57: 717–729. pmid:16215732
  51. 51. Huh JY, Yi DY, Eo SH, Cho H, Park MH, Kang MS (2013) HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 polymorphism in Koreans defined by sequence-based typing of 4128 cord blood units. Int J Immunogenet 40: 515–523. pmid:23724919
  52. 52. Jinam TA, Saitou N, Edo J, Mahmood A, Phipps ME (2010) Molecular analysis of HLA Class I and Class II genes in four indigenous Malaysian populations. Tissue Antigens 75: 151–158. pmid:20003135
  53. 53. Yuliwulandari R, Sachrowardi Q, Nakajima H, Kashiwase K, Hirayasu K, Mabuchi A, et al. (2010) Association of HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 with pulmonary tuberculosis in western Javanese Indonesia. Hum Immunol 71: 697–701. pmid:20438789
  54. 54. Chen R, Ye G, Geng Z, Wang Z, Kong F, Tian D, et al. (1993) [Revelations of the origin of Chinese nation from clustering analysis and frequency distribution of HLA polymorphism in major minority nationalities in mainland China]. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 20: 389–398. pmid:8161470
  55. 55. Tokunaga K, Ohashi J, Bannai M, Juji T (2001) Genetic link between Asians and native Americans: evidence from HLA genes and haplotypes. Hum Immunol 62: 1001–1008. pmid:11543902
  56. 56. Cano P, Klitz W, Mack SJ, Maiers M, Marsh SG, Noreen H, et al. (2007) Common and well-documented HLA alleles: report of the Ad-Hoc committee of the american society for histocompatiblity and immunogenetics. Hum Immunol 68: 392–417. pmid:17462507
  57. 57. Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 564–567. pmid:21565059
  58. 58. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361–372. pmid:1637966
  59. 59. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099–1106. pmid:17305863
  60. 60. Boquett J, Schuler-Faccini L, Jobim LF, Jobim M, Fagundes NJ, Hunemeier T (2015) Self-assessment of color categories and its relationship with HLA profiling in Brazilian bone marrow donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21: 1140–1144. pmid:25704208
  61. 61. Abramson JH (2011) WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 8: 1. pmid:21288353