Figures
Abstract
The LIM homeobox family protein Lhx5 plays important roles in forebrain development in the vertebrates. The lhx5 gene exhibits complex temporal and spatial expression patterns during early development but its transcriptional regulation mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we have used transgenesis in zebrafish in order to define regulatory elements that drive lhx5 expression in the forebrain. Through comparative genomic analysis we identified 10 non-coding sequences conserved in five teleost species. We next examined the enhancer activities of these conserved non-coding sequences with Tol2 transposon mediated transgenesis. We found a proximately located enhancer gave rise to robust reporter EGFP expression in the forebrain regions. In addition, we identified an enhancer located at approximately 50 kb upstream of lhx5 coding region that is responsible for reporter gene expression in the hypothalamus. We also identify an enhancer located approximately 40 kb upstream of the lhx5 coding region that is required for expression in the prethalamus (ventral thalamus). Together our results suggest discrete enhancer elements control lhx5 expression in different regions of the forebrain.
Citation: Sun L, Chen F, Peng G (2015) Conserved Noncoding Sequences Regulate lhx5 Expression in the Zebrafish Forebrain. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525
Editor: Sylvie Rétaux, CNRS, UMR 9197, FRANCE
Received: February 1, 2015; Accepted: June 15, 2015; Published: July 6, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 30970948 and 31371099 to GP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The LIM homeobox family gene lhx5 encodes a protein with two cysteine-rich LIM domains and a homeobox domain [1]. Lhx5 protein is a regulator of central nervous system development [2]. LHX5 gene sequence variations and copy number variants have been investigated for their association with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia [3, 4]. A fundamental role of Lhx5 in hippocampal morphogenesis and neuronal differentiation has been demonstrated in mice [5]. In addition, conditional Lhx5-deficiency causes learning impairment and motor dysfunction in adult mice [6]. Lhx5 regulates development processes in multiple brain regions [7–13]. Previous studies also suggest lhx5 regulate differential adhesion of early ectodermal cells in Xenopus [14], promote forebrain development and inhibit Wnt signaling in zebrafish [15], and regulate neural retina development in chicken [16].
The lhx5 gene has complex temporal and spatial expression patterns during embryonic development. LHX5 transcripts are detected in human fetal brain and in various regions of adult central nervous system including the spinal cord, thalamus, and cerebellum [17]. In mouse, Lhx5 expression is detected in the most anterior portion of the neural tube at the headfold stage. After neural tube closure, Lhx5 is expressed within diencephalic primordium. By mid-gestation, Lhx5 is expressed in the diencephalon and ventral telencephalon. Lhx5 is also expressed in the midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord after E10.5 of gestation [18]. Compared to mouse, Xenopus lhx5 is expressed in entire ectoderm in early gastrula embryo. During neurulation, expression of the lhx5 gene is rapidly restricted to an anterior region in the developing neural plate/keel. In 2-day old Xenopus embryo, this region is more sharply defined, forming a strongly lhx5-expressing domain in the diencephalon anterior to the midbrain-forebrain boundary [19, 20]. Zebrafish lhx5 expression patterns resemble those of Xenopus and by the segmentation stage, zebrafish lhx5 transcripts are detected in the telencephalon, diencephalon, and discrete regions in the hypothalamus and hindbrain [19].
Despite these broadly conserved expression patterns of lhx5 genes, the mechanisms underlying lhx5 transcriptional regulation are not well understood. We showed previously a modified bacteria artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic zebrafish lhx5 line recapitulated endogenous lhx5 expression patterns [21, 22]. Thus the transcriptional regulatory elements are contained in the genomic sequences carried by the BAC, which has approximately 200kb of zebrafish genomic sequences. In this study, we carry out comparative genomic analyses of lhx5 genomic sequences from various vertebrate species. We find multiple conserved non-coding sequences (CNSs) among different species. We further examine the transcriptional regulatory activity of these CNSs by transient and stable transgenic methods in the zebrafish model.
Results
Conserved syntenies in the lhx5 loci
Conserved non-coding sequences (CNSs) are evolutionary conserved intergenic or intronic sequence elements derived from a common ancestor. We carried out comparative sequence analysis of the lhx5 loci to look for CNSs with putative roles in lhx5 gene transcriptional regulation. Twelve vertebrate species representing major groups of the jawed vertebrate lineage were included in our analyses, including genomic sequences from human, mouse, chicken, frog, coelacanth, elephant shark, spotted gar, and five teleost fishes (Fig 1). The shared synteny analyses indicated lhx5 genomic regions in zebrafish and other teleost species showed conserved syntenies. In all teleosts, the mzt2a gene is located upstream to the lhx5 gene. The LHX5 loci in tetrapods didn’t show conserved synteny with the corresponding regions in the teleost fishes. Nevertheless, conserved syntenies were observed between the tetrapods and other fish species (Fig 1A). Thus the cartilaginous elephant shark and the lobe-finned coelacanth showed the same rbm19-lhx5-sdsl gene co-localization as in the tetrapods. Interestingly, the spotted gar mzt2b-rbm19-lhx5 gene co-localization was partially similar to both the tetrapod and the teleost fishes. These conserved synteny results suggested the genomic sequences in the lhx5 regions were conserved through evolution but speciation in teleost lineage has diversified the gene co-localizations.
(A) Genomic regions surrounding lhx5 genes from vertebrate species. The teleost lhx5 gene is flanked by adjacent upstream gene mzt2b (Fugu, Medaka, Tilapia, cavefish and zebrafish). The cartilaginous elephant shark, the lobe-finned coelacanth, and the tetrapod species show the same rbm19-lhx5-sdsl gene co-localization. The spotted gar mzt2b-rbm19-lhx5 gene co-localization is partially similar to both the tetrapod and the teleost fishes. (B) Conserved non-coding sequences (CNS) in the upstream genomic sequence of lhx5 locus in eight representative vertebrate species. Eight of the ten CNSs are teleost-specific, and two CNSs (CNS3 and CNS5) are found in all eight species.
Conserved non-coding sequences in the lhx5 genomic regions
Based on the shared syntenies between spotted gar, tetrapods, and the teleosts, we used the spotted gar as intermediate base species to compare vertebrate lhx5 gene upstream genomic sequences [23]. We performed multiple sequence alignments with MultiPipmaker and mVISTA programs, using a window size of 100 bp and similarity threshold of 70%. Results from both programs were in good agreements. Comparison between the cartilaginous fish, ray-finned fishes, lobe-finned fish and tetrapod identified two common CNSs in all 12 species (Fig 1B). In addition, two more non-exonic sequence elements that qualified as CNSs were identified in the four tetrapod species, and eight CNSs were found among the five teleost species. Interestingly, the spotted gar lhx5 genomic region contained the two additional tetrapod specific CNSs and four of the eight teleost specific CNSs, in addition to the two common CNSs conserved in all 12 species (Fig 1B). A VISTA plot showing the sequence alignment of the lhx5 loci from the five teleost species is shown in the Supplmentary Figures (S1 Fig).
Region specific enhancer activity of the identified CNSs
In the zebrafish genome, the 10 identified teleost specific CNSs were located to a region spanning approximately 50 kb. Two CNSs resided in the first and the third intron of the lhx5 gene, respectively. One CNS was located in the lhx5 promoter region, within 1 kb from the lhx5 transcriptional start site. Other CNSs were located in the upstream distal intragenic regions away from the transcriptional start site. These 10 CNSs were named based on their positions with respect to the lhx5 coding regions as CNS1 to CNS10. The lengths of these CNSs were around 200bp, except for CNS4, which spanned approximately 800 bp (S1 Table).
We first carried out transient reporter EGFP assay to examine tissue specific enhancer activities of these CNS elements. Each of the ten CNSs was PCR amplified and cloned in a vector carrying a basal promoter [24] and a modified Gal4 transcriptional activator coding sequence [25]. In order to maintain the endogenous genomic milieu of these CNS elements in the reporter constructs, the average size of the amplified fragments was around 3Kb and contained genomic sequences surrounding the identified CNS elements (S2 Table).
We then injected each construct into one-cell stage embryos obtained from a UAS:EGFP report line fish [25]. Three independent microinjections were performed for each of the 10 CNS constructs, and the fluorescent signals were examined at 24, 48 and 72 hours post fertilization (hpf). These transient reporter EGFP assays indicated CNS2, CNS4, CNS8, and CNS9 had tissue specific enhancer activities. While the CNS8 and CNS9 constructs gave rise to broad reporter EGFP expression in the forebrain regions, the CNS2 and CNS4 constructs produced more restricted EGFP expression in the forebrain (data not shown). In contrast, the construct carrying the basal promoter produced little or weak non-tissue specific fluorescent signals (Fig 2E). It should be noted that the CNS8 construct likely also carried basal promoter sequences from the endogenous lhx5 gene due to proximity of the CNS8 element and the lhx5 transcription start site. Thus it was unclear whether the CNS8 element contained region specific enhancer activity by itself.
(A-B) CNS8 and CNS9, located in the vicinity of the lhx5 promoter region give rise to broad reporter EGFP expression in the forebrain regions. (C) CNS2 located approximately 50 kb upstream of the lhx5 coding region gives rise to restricted EGFP signal in the anterior ventral forebrain. (D) CNS4 located 40 kb upstream of the lhx5 coding region, gives rise to restricted EGFP expression in the diencephalic region. (E) Vector construct gives rise to basal non-tissue specific EGFP expression in transient expression assay. Lateral view of the forebrain regions of embryos at 24 hpf, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 50μm.
We next used Tol2-based transgenesis to investigate the four CNSs enhancer activities in stable transgenic animals. At least two independent stable transgenic lines with common expression patterns were established for each of the CNS constructs (S2 Fig). Consistent with the transient reporter assays, at 24hpf the two proximately located CNS8 (likely together with lhx5 basal promoter) and CNS9 both gave rise to robust reporter EGFP expression in the forebrain regions including the telencephalon and the retina (Fig 2A and 2B). These gene expression patterns were much broader than the endogenous expression of lhx5. The CNS2 element, which is located 50 kb upstream of the lhx5 coding regions, gave rise to restricted EGFP expression in the ventral forebrain; whereas the CNS4, located 40 kb upstream of the lhx5 coding region, gave rise to restricted EGFP signal in the diencephalic region (Fig 2C and 2D).
CNS2 contains hypothalamic enhancer activity and responses to FGF signaling
We used molecular markers to further examine the reporter EGFP expression in animals carrying the CNS2 enhancer element. nkx2.1a and nkx2.2b are two transcription factors that are specifically expressed in the ventral forebrain, in the hypothalamic regions at 24 hpf. Two-color in situ hybridization results showed reporter EGFP and the two nkx markers were co-expressed in the hypothalamic regions. The region expressing nkx2.1a was broader than the EGFP expressing region, whilst the nkx2.2b expressing region almost overlapped the EGFP expressing region in the hypothalamus (Fig 3A and 3B).
(A-B) Double in situ hybridization results indicate CNS2 contains hypothalamic enhancer activity. The hypothalamic marker nkx2.1a and nkx2.2b are stained in dark blue, reporter egfp stained in red. (C-D) SU5402 treatment severely reduces CNS2 activity. Vehicle DMSO treated embryos show restricted hypothalamic EGFP reporter expression (pointed by the arrow in C). Embryos treated with the FGF signaling inhibitor SU5402 during the segmentation stage (10-24hpf) show minimal EGFP signals in the hypothalamic region (arrow in D, n = 48/55). (E-F) SU5402 treatment down-regulates endogenous lhx5 expression in the hypothalamic region. Endogenous lhx5 shows robust expression in the hypothalamic region (pointed by the arrow in E). SU5402 treatment during the segmentation stage down-regulates lhx5 expression in the hypothalamic region (arrow in F, n = 25/28). (G) Multiple sequence alignments of the CNS2 region in the five teleost species. The identified FGF downstream factor Pea3 binding site is highlighted in blue. Lateral view of the forebrain regions of embryos at 24 hpf (A-F), anterior to the left. Scale bar: 40μm in A-B; 50μm in C-D.
Signaling pathways controlling forebrain patterning and regionalization may regulate transcription factor expression. It was previously reported that FGF signaling pathway was involved in hypothalamus development [26–29]. To examine the likely signaling pathways involved in the regulation of the CNS2 hypothalamic enhancer activity, we used small molecule drug SU5402 to inhibit the FGF signaling. When FGF signaling was inhibited by SU5402 treatment in embryos carrying the CNS2 enhancer element during the segmentation stage (between 10 hpf and 24 hpf), the EGFP expression in the hypothalamic region was severely reduced comparing to the vehicle DMSO treated controls (Fig 3C and 3D). Inhibiting the FGF signaling also abolished endogenous lhx5 expression in the hypothalamic regions (Fig 3E and 3F). We searched for potential transcription factor binding sites in the CNS2 element using rVISTA 2.0 program and found a conserved pea3 binding site in the CNS2 from the five teleost species (Fig 3G). Due to possible pleiotropic effects of FGF signaling inhibition on embryonic development, it is not known whether FGF signaling pathway may act directly through the pea3 binding site within the CNS2 sequence to influence the CNS2 enhancer activity.
CNS4 relies upon a zic binding site to drive pre-thalamic expression
Two-color in-situ hybridization results showed that reporter EGFP expression in embryos carrying CNS4 element was located anteriorly to the shha and dbx1a expression in the diencephalic region (Fig 4A to 4D). Thus the CNS4 elements contained pre-thalamic enhancer activity.
(A-D) Double in situ hybridization results indicate CNS4 contains pre-thalamic enhancer activity. ZLI (zona limitans intrathalamica) marker shha and thalamic marker dbx1a are stained in dark blue, reporter egfp stained in red. CNS4 driven EGFP expression abuts anteriorly to the ZLI and thalamus in the 24hpf (A-B) and 48hpf (C-D) stage embryos. (E-H) The third fragment of the four subdivisions of the CNS4 sequence contains pre-thalamic enhancer activity. (I) Multiple sequence alignments of the CNS4 region in the five teleost species. The identified zic binding site is highlighted in blue. (J) Mutation of the 8bp zic binding site in the prethalamic enhancer abolished its activity. Lateral view of the forebrain regions of embryos at 24 hpf (A-B, E-H, and J) or 48 hpf (C-D), anterior to the left. Scale bar: 50μm.
The pre-thalamic CNS4 enhancer spanned approximately 800 bp. It was the longest fragment in all identified CNSs in our study. The other CNSs were around 200 bp long. We next made four overlapping 200 bp fragments covering the whole length of CNS4 and we examined the potential enhancer activities of these four smaller elements with Tol2-based transgenesis. The first fragment gave broad low level of reporter EGFP expression. The second and the fourth fragments produced little tissue-specific signals. Interestingly, the third fragment gave rise to the same enhancer activity as the whole CNS4 element (Fig 4E to 4H).
In order to better define the mechanism regulating the third fragment’s enhancer activity in the pre-thalamus, we searched for potential transcription factor binding sites within this fragment by the rVISTA 2.0 program. Through conserved binding site motif search we found a zic family member binding site (Fig 4I). Previous study showed the zic family member Zic2a was involved in the regulation of two prethalamic transcription factor dlx2a and arxa. [30]. To test whether the zic binding site we identified was involved in the regulation of the prethalamic enhancer activity, we made a construct with site-specific mutation at the predicted zic binding site (mut8 construct, binding site changed from GACCTCCC to GAAATAAA) and generated stable transgenic animals. The mutated transgenes were mapped to chromosome 13 and chromosome 24 in two independent stable transgenic lines, respectively (S3 Fig). Consistent with the zic involvement in the transcriptional regulation of the CNS4, the site-specific mutation construct completely lost the prethalamic enhancer activity (Fig 4J).
Discussion
In this study, we took advantage of comparative genomics and Tol2 mediated transgenesis in the zebrafish model to examine the transcriptional regulation of the lhx5 gene. We identified multiple conserved no-coding sequence elements in 12 vertebrate species ranging from the cartilaginous fish to the human. We found three teleost specific CNSs that can drive reporter gene expression in discrete regions in the developing zebrafish forebrain.
Evolutionally conservation of the regulatory elements of the lhx5 gene
Vertebrate lhx5 belongs to the Lhx1/5 subclass of the Lim homeobox gene family, homologous of C. elegans lin-11 and D. melanogaster bk87 [2]. All lhx5 genes shared conserved function during vertebrate CNS patterning and embryonic development [5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16]. The lhx5 gene expression patterns also seem largely conserved in the vertebrates [17, 19, 20, 31]. Remarkably, in primitive vertebrate species such as amphioxus, lhx5 homolog is also expressed in the anterior central nervous systems [32]. The similarity in lhx5 expression patterns in species ranging from the amphioxus to the mammals suggests lhx5 expression is based on conserved mechanisms. In the jawed vertebrates lineage, comparative genomic analyses have revealed shared conserved non-coding sequence elements in tetrapods, ray-finned fishes, lobe-finned fishes and cartilaginous fish species [33, 34].
The three region specific enhancer elements identified in our study are conserved in the teleost lineage only. No corresponding CNS elements are found in the tetrapod lineage. Nevertheless, our synteny analysis results and the existence of pan-vertebrate CNSs indicate sequence conservations in the lhx5 upstream regulatory regions. Therefore, it is possible the corresponding regulatory elements have become too diversified to be recognizable by sequence comparison methods we employed. A previous study showed the regulatory sequences from the human RET locus were able to drive ret-specific expression in zebrafish, despite there was no recognizable sequence similarity between the human and zebrafish regulatory elements [35]. In addition, enhancers from the even skipped locus in the scavenger and the vinegar flies did not show sequence similarities but were functionally similar [36].
lhx5 expression in the prethalamus
The endogenous lhx5 gene is expressed in the prethalamus in developing zebrafish brain [37, 38]. Here we showed the CNS4 element of lhx5 can drive region specific reporter expression in the prethalamus. Interestingly, it has been shown epigenetic marker H3K4me1 is enriched in the CNS4 region during the early development of zebrafish embryos [39]. The enrichment of H3K4me1 modification at the CNS4 region is consistent with its involvement in the transcriptional regulation of the endogenous lhx5 gene.
Prethalamus is part of the diencephalon. Based on the prosomeric model [40–42], prethalamus corresponds to prosomere 3 (p3). Previous studies have shown within the diencephalon, the patterning events are regulated by the mid-diencephalic organizer (MDO) zona limitans intrathalamica (ZLI) [38, 43]. Hedgehog signal emanating from the ZLI plays essential functions in the prethalamus development [38]. Downstream of the hedgehog signaling pathway, the Zic family transcriptional factors may mediate the effect of hedgehog signal [44, 45]. In the developing zebrafish forebrain between 4 and 8 somite stages, the zic2a gene is expressed in the regions fated to become the prethalamus. Thus knockdown of zic2a function perturbs the prethalamic development and caused significant reduction of region specific marker expression in the prethalamus [30]. Later in segmentation stages, zic2a is no longer expressed in the prethalamic regions and Zic2a may act independently of hedgehog signaling to promote prethalamic development [30]. Interestingly, the zic3 gene is expressed in the anterior diencephalon during the segmentation and pharyngula stages. A recent study showed Zic3 interaction with distal regulatory elements of stage specific developmental genes including lhx5 in the zebrafish model [46]. The identified Zic3 binding site lies more upstream of the region we studied, and the sequence of the identified Zic3 binding site is different from the potential zic binding site identified in our site-specific mutation analysis. The zic binding site identified in our study conforms to the Zic3 consensus binding site determined in a previous report [47].
In conclusion, our study identified multiple conserved non-coding sequence elements in the lhx5 locus. Three of the teleost specific CNSs can drive reporter gene expression in discrete regions in the developing zebrafish forebrain. Together our results suggest that discrete enhancer elements control lhx5 expression in different regions of the forebrain.
Materials and Methods
Sequence analysis
Sequences for 12 gnathostome lhx5 loci were downloaded from NCBI RefSeq genome sequences: Danio rerio (zebrafish): chromosome 21:14116198..14290982; Takifugu rubripes (fugu): chromosome 6:5719292..5770520; Oryzias latipes (medaka): chromosome 12:2078644..2245397; Oreochromis niloticus (Nile tilapia): NC_022205:11084704..11177152; Lepisosteus oculatus (spotted gar): NC_023198:14084503..14284612; Astyanax mexicanus (Mexican tetra, blind cave fish): NW_006749407:14473..208111; Latimeria chalumnae (coelacanth): NW_005819674:109551..725575; Gallus gallus (chicken) chromosome 15:12452471..12575304; Homo sapiens (human) chromosome 12:113462889..113966371; Mus musculus (house mouse) chromosome 5:120116513..120441457; Xenopus tropicalis (western clawed frog) NW_004668232:61749600..61904154; Callorhinchus milii (elephant shark) NW_006890147:2032526..2289716. Alignments of long genomic sequences were performed with the mVISTA LAGAN program [48, 49]. For alignments of the conserved region upstream of lhx5 at the nucleotide level the ClustalX program [50] was used. For the prediction of transcription factor binding sites the rVista 2.0 server [51] with TRANSFAC database was employed (search parameters: TRANSFAC Professional; biological species: vertebrates; matrix similarity: optimized for function) [52].
Fish maintenance
Zebrafish were maintained in a recirculating water system according to standard protocol [53]. Zebrafish embryos were obtained from mating of adult fish and raised at 28.5°C as described [53]. Embryos were staged by hours post fertilization (hpf) [54]. The Fudan University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all work with zebrafish animals (project number: 0227–092).
Vector construction
The backbone plasmid pminiTol2-super-Gal4FF contains minimal Tol2 transposable elements [55] flanking a super core basal promoter [24] and a modified version of Gal4 transcriptional activator [25]. The backbone plasmid was linearized by SmaI restriction digestion and then dephosphorylated by calf intestine phosphatase treatment. DNA fragments containing the conserved non-coding sequences were amplified by PCR with primers listed in S2 Table. The sizes and coordinates of the amplified fragments are listed in S2 Table. The BAC clone DKEY-106C24 (GenBank ACCESSSION: BX569800) was used as the PCR template. PCR products were treated with T4 polynucleotide kinase and then ligated into the linearized backbone vector. Constructs with forward insertion of CNSs were selected by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing. All constructs were verified by sequencing.
To divide the prethalamic specific CNS4 element into four overlapping fragments, PCR primers listed in S2 Table were used.
To mutate the zic binding site, we replace the original binding site sequence GACCTCCC with GAAATAAA via chemical synthesis (Sangon, Shanghai) of the ~200 bp F3 fragment.
Generation of Tg(lhx5:Gal4FF, UAS:EGFP) transgenic line
Generation of transgenic zebrafish was performed essentially as described [56]. Briefly, the constructs carrying lhx5 CNS were prepared over standard columns then further purified by dialysis. Tol2 transposase mRNA was in vitro transcribed from linearized pCS2-TP plasmid (kindly provided by Prof. Koichi Kawakami) with mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 Transcription Kit and then column-purified. For injection, equal volumes of 20 ng/μl of plasmid DNA and 200 ng/μl of transposase mRNA were mixed and 1~2 nl of the mixture was injected into one-cell stage embryos.
To identify transgenic founder fish, 50–100 of embryos injected with a given plasmid were raised to maturity and outcrossed with Tg(UAS:EGFP) reporter line animal [25]. Outcrossed off-springs were analyzed for EGFP expression using a stereo fluorescence microscope (Leica M205FA). Two independent stable transgenic lines with common expression patterns were established for each CNS construct.
Fluorescence microscopy
Zebrafish embryos were treated with 0.003% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) to inhibit pigmentation. Embryos were anesthetized with tricaine, mounted in 3% methyl cellulose, and imaged under a fluorescence microscope (Leica M205FA).
Whole-mount In situ hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described [57]. Digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes were hybridized and then detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated digoxigenin antibody Fab fragment (1:7500, Roche) and alkaline phosphatase substrate NBT/BCIP (1:80, Roche). Two color whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described [58].
To make probe clones, RT-PCRs were performed with primers listed in S3 Table. The EGFP fragment of pEGFP-N3 (Clontech) plasmid was isolated using the HindIII and NotI sites and subcloned via the same sites into pBlueScript II KS (+) (Stratagene). All clones were verified by sequencing. Whole mount in situ images were acquired on a dissection microscope with a CCD camera (Leica M205FA).
Drug treatment
To block Fgf signaling, embryos were treated with 20 μM SU5402 (Calbiochem) in embryos medium from 10 hpf to 24 hpf at 28.5°C. Control embryos were treated in embryo medium with DMSO (SU5402 vehicle). Embryos were placed in 12-well plates (30 embryos per well) with 0.5 ml of medium. After drug treatment, embryos were fixed and processed for in situ hybridization.
Insertion mapping by hiTAIL-PCR
To determine insertion sites of the transgenic enhancer constructs, high efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (hiTAIL-PCR) was performed as described [59], with primers listed in S4 Table. In brief, first round PCR was carried out with LAD1-LAD4 primer mixture and mapLa or mapR1 primer. Second round PCR was carried out with AC1 primer and Tag-mapLb or Tag-mapR2 primer. Third round PCR was carried out with AC1 primer and mapLc or mapR3 primer. Final PCR products were sequenced and BLAST search were performed against Ensembl zebrafish GRCz10 genomic sequence build.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Sequence alignment of the lhx5 loci from teleost fish.
Vista plot of the aligned sequences. Zebrafish sequence is used as the base. The identified CNSs are labeled on the Vista plot.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s001
(TIFF)
S2 Fig. Stable transgenic lines carrying CNS elements.
(A) Figure panels illustrate established transgenic lines carrying corresponding CNS elements. Line id is indicated on the upper left corner on the figure panel. Lateral view of the forebrain regions of embryos, anterior to the left. (B) Text description of the established transgenic lines. The line id used in experiments described in the Result section is indicated.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s002
(TIFF)
S3 Fig. Characterization of insertion sites of the zic binding site mutation construct in the zebrafish genome.
The mutated transgene is inserted at chr13:10057513 and chr24: 1892994 in two independent stable transgenic lines, respectively. The coordinates are based on the Ensembl zebreafish GRCz10 genomic sequence build.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s003
(TIFF)
S1 Table. Sequence coordinates of the identified CNS elements.
The sequence coordinates on the Ensembl zebreafish GRCz10 genomic sequence build and the BAC DKEY-106C24 sequence are listed. The sequence identities of CNS elements between the GRCz10 build and DKEY-106C24 are also listed.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s004
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Primer sequences used in this study.
The sequence coordinates and sizes of the cloned fragments are listed on sheet named CNS. The primer used in sub-dividing CNS4 are listed on sheet named CNS4.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s005
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Primer sequences used in constructing plasmids for in situ probes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s006
(XLSX)
S4 Table. Primer sequences used in the hiTAIL-PCR.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132525.s007
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We greatly appreciate the generosity of Dr. K. Kawakami for the UAS:EGFP fish line and the GAL4FF coding sequence construct used in this study.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: LS GP. Performed the experiments: LS FC. Analyzed the data: LS FC GP. Wrote the paper: LS GP.
References
- 1. Kadrmas JL, Beckerle MC. The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2004;5(11):920–31. pmid:15520811.
- 2. Hobert O, Westphal H. Functions of LIM-homeobox genes. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2000;16(2):75–83. pmid:10652534.
- 3. Green EK, Elvidge GP, Owen MJ, Craddock N. Mutational analysis of two positional candidate susceptibility genes for bipolar disorder on chromosome 12q23-q24: phenylalanine hydroxylase and human LIM-homeobox LHX5. Psychiatr Genet. 2003;13(2):97–101. pmid:12782966.
- 4. Lee CH, Liu CM, Wen CC, Chang SM, Hwu HG. Genetic copy number variants in sib pairs both affected with schizophrenia. J Biomed Sci. 2010;17:2. pmid:20064257; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2843606.
- 5. Zhao Y, Sheng HZ, Amini R, Grinberg A, Lee E, Huang S, et al. Control of hippocampal morphogenesis and neuronal differentiation by the LIM homeobox gene Lhx5. Science. 1999;284(5417):1155–8. pmid:10325223.
- 6. Paylor R, Zhao Y, Libbey M, Westphal H, Crawley JN. Learning impairments and motor dysfunctions in adult Lhx5-deficient mice displaying hippocampal disorganization. Physiol Behav. 2001;73(5):781–92. pmid:11566211.
- 7. Miquelajauregui A, Varela-Echavarria A, Ceci ML, Garcia-Moreno F, Ricano I, Hoang K, et al. LIM-homeobox gene Lhx5 is required for normal development of Cajal-Retzius cells. J Neurosci. 2010;30(31):10551–62. pmid:20685998; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2927820.
- 8. Okada T, Okumura Y, Motoyama J, Ogawa M. FGF8 signaling patterns the telencephalic midline by regulating putative key factors of midline development. Dev Biol. 2008;320(1):92–101. pmid:18547559.
- 9. Zhao Y, Kwan KM, Mailloux CM, Lee WK, Grinberg A, Wurst W, et al. LIM-homeodomain proteins Lhx1 and Lhx5, and their cofactor Ldb1, control Purkinje cell differentiation in the developing cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(32):13182–6. pmid:17664423; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1941824.
- 10. Brohl D, Strehle M, Wende H, Hori K, Bormuth I, Nave KA, et al. A transcriptional network coordinately determines transmitter and peptidergic fate in the dorsal spinal cord. Dev Biol. 2008;322(2):381–93. pmid:18721803.
- 11. Pillai A, Mansouri A, Behringer R, Westphal H, Goulding M. Lhx1 and Lhx5 maintain the inhibitory-neurotransmitter status of interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Development. 2007;134(2):357–66. pmid:17166926.
- 12. Nakagawa Y, O'Leary DD. Combinatorial expression patterns of LIM-homeodomain and other regulatory genes parcellate developing thalamus. J Neurosci. 2001;21(8):2711–25. pmid:11306624.
- 13. Makki N, Capecchi MR. Identification of novel Hoxa1 downstream targets regulating hindbrain, neural crest and inner ear development. Developmental biology. 2011;357(2):295–304. pmid:21784065; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3176680.
- 14. Houston DW, Wylie C. The Xenopus LIM-homeodomain protein Xlim5 regulates the differential adhesion properties of early ectoderm cells. Development. 2003;130(12):2695–704. pmid:12736213.
- 15. Peng G, Westerfield M. Lhx5 promotes forebrain development and activates transcription of secreted Wnt antagonists. Development. 2006;133(16):3191–200. pmid:16854974.
- 16. Inoue J, Ueda Y, Bando T, Mito T, Noji S, Ohuchi H. The expression of LIM-homeobox genes, Lhx1 and Lhx5, in the forebrain is essential for neural retina differentiation. Dev Growth Differ. 2013;55(7):668–75. pmid:24024588.
- 17. Zhao Y, Hermesz E, Yarolin MC, Westphal H. Genomic structure, chromosomal localization and expression of the human LIM-homeobox gene LHX5. Gene. 2000;260(1–2):95–101. pmid:11137295.
- 18. Sheng HZ, Bertuzzi S, Chiang C, Shawlot W, Taira M, Dawid I, et al. Expression of murine Lhx5 suggests a role in specifying the forebrain. Dev Dyn. 1997;208(2):266–77. pmid:9022063.
- 19. Toyama R, Curtiss PE, Otani H, Kimura M, Dawid IB, Taira M. The LIM class homeobox gene lim5: implied role in CNS patterning in Xenopus and zebrafish. Dev Biol. 1995;170(2):583–93. pmid:7649385.
- 20. Bachy I, Vernier P, Retaux S. The LIM-homeodomain gene family in the developing Xenopus brain: conservation and divergences with the mouse related to the evolution of the forebrain. J Neurosci. 2001;21(19):7620–9. pmid:11567052.
- 21. Gao J, Zhang C, Yang B, Sun L, Zhang C, Westerfield M, et al. Dcc regulates asymmetric outgrowth of forebrain neurons in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36516. pmid:22606267; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3351449.
- 22. Zhang C, Gao J, Zhang H, Sun L, Peng G. Robo2—slit and Dcc—netrin1 coordinate neuron axonal pathfinding within the embryonic axon tracts. J Neurosci. 2012;32(36):12589–602. pmid:22956848.
- 23. Amores A, Catchen J, Ferrara A, Fontenot Q, Postlethwait JH. Genome evolution and meiotic maps by massively parallel DNA sequencing: spotted gar, an outgroup for the teleost genome duplication. Genetics. 2011;188(4):799–808. pmid:21828280; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3176089.
- 24. Juven-Gershon T, Cheng S, Kadonaga JT. Rational design of a super core promoter that enhances gene expression. Nat Methods. 2006;3(11):917–22. pmid:17124735.
- 25. Asakawa K, Suster ML, Mizusawa K, Nagayoshi S, Kotani T, Urasaki A, et al. Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(4):1255–60. pmid:18202183; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2234125.
- 26. Ericson J, Norlin S, Jessell TM, Edlund T. Integrated FGF and BMP signaling controls the progression of progenitor cell differentiation and the emergence of pattern in the embryonic anterior pituitary. Development. 1998;125(6):1005–15. pmid:9463347.
- 27. Herzog W, Sonntag C, von der Hardt S, Roehl HH, Varga ZM, Hammerschmidt M. Fgf3 signaling from the ventral diencephalon is required for early specification and subsequent survival of the zebrafish adenohypophysis. Development. 2004;131(15):3681–92. pmid:15229178.
- 28. Liu F, Pogoda HM, Pearson CA, Ohyama K, Lohr H, Hammerschmidt M, et al. Direct and indirect roles of Fgf3 and Fgf10 in innervation and vascularisation of the vertebrate hypothalamic neurohypophysis. Development. 2013;140(5):1111–22. pmid:23404108; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3583045.
- 29. Pearson CA, Ohyama K, Manning L, Aghamohammadzadeh S, Sang H, Placzek M. FGF-dependent midline-derived progenitor cells in hypothalamic infundibular development. Development. 2011;138(12):2613–24. pmid:21610037; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3100713.
- 30. Sanek NA, Grinblat Y. A novel role for zebrafish zic2a during forebrain development. Dev Biol. 2008;317(1):325–35. Epub 2008/03/25. pmid:18358464; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2409112.
- 31. Osorio J, Mazan S, Retaux S. Organisation of the lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) embryonic brain: insights from LIM-homeodomain, Pax and hedgehog genes. Dev Biol. 2005;288(1):100–12. pmid:16289025.
- 32. Langeland JA, Holland LZ, Chastain RA, Holland ND. An amphioxus LIM-homeobox gene, AmphiLim1/5, expressed early in the invaginating organizer region and later in differentiating cells of the kidney and central nervous system. Int J Biol Sci. 2006;2(3):110–6. pmid:16763670; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1458433.
- 33. Venkatesh B, Lee AP, Ravi V, Maurya AK, Lian MM, Swann JB, et al. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature. 2014;505(7482):174–9. pmid:24402279; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3964593.
- 34. Amemiya CT, Alfoldi J, Lee AP, Fan S, Philippe H, Maccallum I, et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature. 2013;496(7445):311–6. pmid:23598338; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3633110.
- 35. Fisher S, Grice EA, Vinton RM, Bessling SL, McCallion AS. Conservation of RET regulatory function from human to zebrafish without sequence similarity. Science. 2006;312(5771):276–9. pmid:16556802.
- 36. Hare EE, Peterson BK, Iyer VN, Meier R, Eisen MB. Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(6):e1000106. pmid:18584029; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2430619.
- 37. Jeong JY, Einhorn Z, Mathur P, Chen L, Lee S, Kawakami K, et al. Patterning the zebrafish diencephalon by the conserved zinc-finger protein Fezl. Development. 2007;134(1):127–36. Epub 2006/12/14. pmid:17164418.
- 38. Scholpp S, Wolf O, Brand M, Lumsden A. Hedgehog signalling from the zona limitans intrathalamica orchestrates patterning of the zebrafish diencephalon. Development. 2006;133(5):855–64. Epub 2006/02/03. pmid:16452095.
- 39. Aday AW, Zhu LJ, Lakshmanan A, Wang J, Lawson ND. Identification of cis regulatory features in the embryonic zebrafish genome through large-scale profiling of H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 binding sites. Dev Biol. 2011;357(2):450–62. pmid:21435340; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3273848.
- 40. Puelles L, Harrison M, Paxinos G, Watson C. A developmental ontology for the mammalian brain based on the prosomeric model. Trends in neurosciences. 2013;36(10):570–8. pmid:23871546.
- 41. Puelles L, Rubenstein JL. Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26(9):469–76. Epub 2003/09/02. pmid:12948657.
- 42. Rubenstein JL, Martinez S, Shimamura K, Puelles L. The embryonic vertebrate forebrain: the prosomeric model. Science. 1994;266(5185):578–80. pmid:7939711.
- 43. Kiecker C, Lumsden A. Hedgehog signaling from the ZLI regulates diencephalic regional identity. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(11):1242–9. Epub 2004/10/21. pmid:15494730.
- 44. Koyabu Y, Nakata K, Mizugishi K, Aruga J, Mikoshiba K. Physical and functional interactions between Zic and Gli proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(10):6889–92. pmid:11238441.
- 45. Mizugishi K, Aruga J, Nakata K, Mikoshiba K. Molecular properties of Zic proteins as transcriptional regulators and their relationship to GLI proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(3):2180–8. pmid:11053430.
- 46. Winata CL, Kondrychyn I, Kumar V, Srinivasan KG, Orlov Y, Ravishankar A, et al. Genome wide analysis reveals Zic3 interaction with distal regulatory elements of stage specific developmental genes in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(10):e1003852. pmid:24204288; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3814314.
- 47. Lim LS, Hong FH, Kunarso G, Stanton LW. The pluripotency regulator Zic3 is a direct activator of the Nanog promoter in ESCs. Stem Cells. 2010;28(11):1961–9. pmid:20872845.
- 48. Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, Program NCS, et al. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome research. 2003;13(4):721–31. pmid:12654723; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC430158.
- 49. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(Web Server issue):W273–9. pmid:15215394; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC441596.
- 50. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8. pmid:17846036.
- 51. Loots GG, Ovcharenko I. rVISTA 2.0: evolutionary analysis of transcription factor binding sites. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(Web Server issue):W217–21. pmid:15215384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC441521.
- 52. Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, Barre-Dirrie A, et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic acids research. 2006;34(Database issue):D108–10. pmid:16381825; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1347505.
- 53.
Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). 5th ed. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Press; 2007.
- 54. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 1995;203(3):253–310. pmid:8589427.
- 55. Urasaki A, Morvan G, Kawakami K. Functional dissection of the Tol2 transposable element identified the minimal cis-sequence and a highly repetitive sequence in the subterminal region essential for transposition. Genetics. 2006;174(2):639–49. pmid:16959904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1602067.
- 56. Asakawa K, Kawakami K. The Tol2-mediated Gal4-UAS method for gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Methods. 2009;49(3):275–81. pmid:19835787; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2764541.
- 57. Thisse C, Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nature protocols. 2008;3(1):59–69. pmid:18193022.
- 58. Hauptmann G, Gerster T. Two-color whole-mount in situ hybridization to vertebrate and Drosophila embryos. Trends in genetics: TIG. 1994;10(8):266. pmid:7940754.
- 59. Liu YG, Chen Y. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences. Biotechniques. 2007;43(5):649–50, 52, 54 passim. pmid:18072594.