Functional Traits and Water Transport Strategies in Lowland Tropical Rainforest Trees

Deborah M. G. Apgaua; Françoise Y. Ishida; David Y. P. Tng; Melinda J. Laidlaw; Rubens M. Santos; Rizwana Rumman; Derek Eamus; Joseph A. M. Holtum; Susan G. W. Laurance

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130799

Abstract

Understanding how tropical rainforest trees may respond to the precipitation extremes predicted in future climate change scenarios is paramount for their conservation and management. Tree species clearly differ in drought susceptibility, suggesting that variable water transport strategies exist. Using a multi-disciplinary approach, we examined the hydraulic variability in trees in a lowland tropical rainforest in north-eastern Australia. We studied eight tree species representing broad plant functional groups (one palm and seven eudicot mature-phase, and early-successional trees). We characterised the species’ hydraulic system through maximum rates of volumetric sap flow and velocities using the heat ratio method, and measured rates of tree growth and several stem, vessel, and leaf traits. Sap flow measures exhibited limited variability across species, although early-successional species and palms had high mean sap velocities relative to most mature-phase species. Stem, vessel, and leaf traits were poor predictors of sap flow measures. However, these traits exhibited different associations in multivariate analysis, revealing gradients in some traits across species and alternative hydraulic strategies in others. Trait differences across and within tree functional groups reflect variation in water transport and drought resistance strategies. These varying strategies will help in our understanding of changing species distributions under predicted drought scenarios.

Citation: Apgaua DMG, Ishida FY, Tng DYP, Laidlaw MJ, Santos RM, Rumman R, et al. (2015) Functional Traits and Water Transport Strategies in Lowland Tropical Rainforest Trees. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799

Academic Editor: Runguo Zang, Chinese Academy of Forestry, CHINA

Received: February 27, 2015; Accepted: May 26, 2015; Published: June 18, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Apgaua et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (http://www.arc.gov.au/DP130104092), FT130101319 (grants to SGWL), Skyrail Rainforest Foundation (http://www.skyrailfoundation.org/)(grants to DMGA), Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (http://www.tern.org.au/)(grants to DE). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) funded DMGA during the course of this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

One of the major threats to earth’s biodiversity are precipitation extremes predicted in future climate change scenarios [1]. In particular, tropical forests are likely to experience more frequent and severe droughts and increased aridity [2, 3], which can result in high levels of hydraulic stress in trees, loss of biomass and increased mortality [4, 5]. Drought is also likely to shape species’ distributions in tropical forests [6, 7]. The resilience of tropical forests to such events will therefore depend collectively on the strategies trees use to transport water and respond to water deficits.

Tree water transport can be studied by measuring rates of volumetric sap flow and sap velocities [8, 9]. Over the past decade, researchers have been adopting an increasingly multidisciplinary approach to study plant water transport incorporating the measurement of several stem and leaf traits [10, 11]. Such functional traits encompass morphological and physiological features that regulate the ecological functioning of a species [12]. Leaf area and leaf length to breadth ratio (i.e. leaf slenderness) for instance, determines the available area for transpiration [13]. Other leaf traits such as leaf mass per area are strongly correlated with key biological processes, including growth rate [14] and photosynthetic capacity [15], which in turn may be directly or indirectly related to plant water use [16].

Wood density is a key functional trait that is positively correlated with drought resistance [17] by increasing the strength of fibres associated with vessels [18], and by increasing the resistance of sapwood to xylem embolism [19]. However, the universality of this relationship is in question as even within a single biome, for example, rainforests, trees exhibit a wide range of wood densities [20, 21]. Rather, differences in wood density may relate more to adjustments in vessel characteristics such as vessel cross-sectional size, density and fractions (i.e. frequency and cross-sectional area occupied by open vessel spaces respectively per unit area) [21, 22].

More important than having a modulating effect on wood density, stem vessel size distribution, density and fractions affect the hydraulic conductivity of xylem [23, 24]. The different combinations of vessel sizes and densities can also reflect different strategies used to deal with water deficit [25]. Other anatomical traits such as the amount and arrangement of parenchyma in wood are also increasingly being recognized for their functional significance relating to drought adaptation [21, 25, 26]. Sapwood area and the ratio of sapwood to leaf areas (i.e. Huber values) also have important roles in modulating water transport and tree growth [27, 28]. Collectively, these stem traits are important structural aspects of the hydraulic architecture of a plant [29].

Since both leaf and stem traits are involved in plant water relations, understanding how trees may respond to water deficit requires an understanding how these traits vary across species [30, 31]. Given the high tree species richness in the tropics, we hypothesise a commensurate variety of trait strategies involved in the common function of water transport and drought resistance. In recent years, ecologists have used multivariate methods to examine various aspects of these relationships [22, 32] and to characterise water use trait strategies across species [11, 26, 31].

An ongoing rainfall exclusion experiment in a permanent plot of lowland tropical rainforest in northern Australia provided an opportunity to study the water transport trait strategies of tropical trees. The study species are being monitored in situ with sap flow sensors to determine their rates of water use prior to the implementation of rainfall exclusion. Understanding how water transport trait strategies vary between species and how this affects sap flow will provide an important context for the rainfall-exclusion study. We therefore characterized and examined the trait strategies related to water transport in eight co-occurring species of lowland tropical rain forest trees.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Permission to sample vegetation was not necessary as the study site was on land owned by the James Cook University. Internal approval from James Cook University was granted for performing the experiment on the property. No protected species were sampled.

Study site and species

Our study site is located in a one-hectare permanent plot in lowland tropical rainforest at the Daintree Rainforest Observatory, Cape Tribulation (16°06′20″S, 145°26′40″E) in north-eastern Australia. We selected seven common eudicot and one monocot palm (>8 tree stems/ha >10 cm DBH), representing different functional groups [33] (Table 1). These species belong to different genera and families, thereby preventing bias due to close phylogenetic relatedness [34]. For brevity, we henceforth refer to our study species by their genus. We sampled four mature individuals (>60% potential height) of each species, with the exception of Castanospermum for which resources limited sampling to two individuals. Our sample selection was complemented with a canopy crane assessment to ensure that we selected individuals with well-illuminated crowns, that were not overtopped by other species, and which had limited liana load. In the case of Myristica, which is an understorey tree, all the individuals we selected were partially overtopped by canopy trees (60% to 70% crown exposed). However the variation in crown exposure of the four selected individuals was minimal, and in all cases well-illuminated branches were accessible by the crane.

Download:

Table 1. Tree species used in the study, their functional groups and high-order trait characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.t001

Traits

We measured physiological, morphological and anatomical traits related to plant water use and growth (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Traits evaluated in the current study and their hypothesized ecological relevance to tree water use.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.t002

We obtained sap flow measurements by the heat ratio method [35] using commercially-available sap flow meters (Model: SFM1; ICT International) [36]. The sap flow meters were installed at 1.3 m height on the bole, with the exception of buttressed trees (Argyrodendron) on which the devices were installed 50 cm above the buttress. Sap flow data was used for a four to nine day time window at the end of the dry season in November 2013 as this coincided with a period where all equipment was functioning simultaneously. The total rainfall for the nine-day period was 27 mm, and there was no rainfall recorded for a week prior to this. Meteorological data was obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology [37] for the Cape Tribulation Store weather station (no. 31012), which is < 1 km northeast of the study site. For each individual, we computed the mean maximum rates of sap flow and sap velocities over four to nine complete days.

As a measure of tree growth, we calculated the mean annual basal area increment (BA_i) of our study individuals using a 12-year (2001–2015) dataset from the permanent one-hectare plot. BA_i was obtained by subtracting the most recent from the earliest basal area measurement available, and then dividing the difference with the number of years that had elapsed between those two measurements. We restricted BA_i comparisons to the seven eudicot species.

From the individuals sampled for sap flow, we measured stem and leaf functional traits, which are variously correlated with plant growth rate, light-use-efficiency, water-use-efficiency and relative drought resistance [12] (Table 2).

Two cores, each ca. 5 cm long, were obtained with an increment corer from each individual tree at breast height. We measured using callipers the depth of sapwood, which was determined visually by a colour change in the sapwood/heartwood interface. We used this to calculate sapwood area by subtracting the cross-sectional area of the non-sapwood area from that of the trunk (excluding bark). “Sapwood area” for Normanbya was calculated from the entire cross-sectional area of the palm stem at 1.3 m DBH, excluding the bark. Due to the hard wood, coring for sapwood samples was also not feasible for Normanbya. We therefore collected wood wedge samples at 1.3 m DBH from Normanbya individuals of a similar diameter to those used in sap flow measurements. The sapwood samples were sanded and polished with increasing grits of sanding paper until anatomical structures were visible. Sapwood vessels from the first two centimeters of sapwood towards the bark were examined with a stereo microscope (30x magnification; Nikon SMZ 745T) and photographed (Nikon DS-Fi2). On the digital photographs, vessels were measured for area (vessel area: VA) and density (vessel density: VD) using imaging software GIMP 2.8.10 [38].

From the vessel areas and cross sectional areas of digital images, we computed the vessel fraction (VF = VA × VD: total cross-sectional area used for sap transport). The idealized vessel diameters (V_dia) was calculated for each species and we used the Hagen–Poiseuille equation to calculate the theoretical specific xylem hydraulic conductivity (henceforth theoretical specific conductivity) as: K_s = π/128ƞA_{cross sectional area} x ΣD⁴, where ƞ is the viscosity (1.002 × 10⁻⁹ MPa s^-1) and ρ is the density of water (998.23 kg m^-3) respectively at 20°C [23]. We also derived a vulnerability index (VI = V_dia/VD: susceptibility to cavitation) [39] for each individual. Wood density was measured on adjacent 5 to 10 mm length of sapwood core segments from the same cores sampled for the vessel measurements using the water displacement method [20]. For the palm Normanbya, we used wood wedge samples (see above).

We used the canopy crane to access leaf and branch material in the canopy. Leaf water potential (Ψ_L) was measured at regular intervals from predawn (0500–0600 h) to 1950 h within a week in May 2014, using a pressure chamber [12]. The total rainfall for the week prior to collection dates was 52 mm, and there was no rainfall for a week prior to this period [37]. For our purposes, we only use the averages of the minimum and maximum Ψ_L as indicators of the leaf water status at the driest time of the day and resting state water relations respectively [12, 40]. Milky exudate in Alstonia scholaris obscured pressure chamber readings so we used literature Ψ_L values from a related species, Alstonia macrophylla Wall. [41]. Like A. scholaris, A. macrophylla is a fast growing rainforest successional species [42]. For leaf area, leaf slenderness (defined as the ratio of the leaf length to leaf breadth), leaf mass per area (LMA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC), five to 20 replicates per individual of sun-exposed leaves were obtained from the tree canopy. For the compound-leaved Castanospermum, leaflets were taken to be the functional unit equivalent to leaves. Leaf areas were obtained from scans processed in imaging software GIMP. Leaf thickness was measured using a calliper, avoiding major veins. These leaves were weighed fresh and then weighed after drying 60°C for a week. LMA was the ratio of leaf dry weight to oven dried mass and LDMC was leaf dry mass divided by fresh mass. For leaf carbon isotope ratio (δ¹³C) determination, leaves were ground finely using a bead mill grinder and analysed at the Terrestrial Ecohydrology laboratory, School of the Environment, University of Technology, Sydney. We calculated the intrinsic water-use-efficiencies (WUE_i) of each species from δ¹³C values after Werner et al. [43]. For Huber values we collected terminal branches with leaves and measured the total leaf areas of all the leaves on the branch, and also the cross sectional area of the cut branch. Huber values were then computed by dividing the branch sapwood area (excluding pith area) by leaf areas.

Data Analyses

We analysed the data using both univariate and multivariate statistics. Variables were checked for normality and transformed where necessary before analysis. Univariate one-way ANOVAs were performed for each trait and significant differences between species were determined by Tukey HSD tests (confidence level of 0.05). From 30 trees, we identified major gradients in functional traits using Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination [44]. To improve ordination performance, traits were standardized. Monte Carlo randomization tests (100 runs) were used to determine whether ordination axes explained significantly more variation than expected by chance. When testing for correlations between individual functional traits and ordination axes, Bonferroni-corrected alpha values were used to reduce the experiment-wise error rate (p = 0.1/28 = 0.00357).

We used linear mixed effects models (with Restricted Maximum Likelihood) to examine relationships between sap flow measures and annual basal area increment (response variables) as a function of leaf and stem traits. We used the two NMDS axes as fixed factors in the models to resolve the high levels of inter-correlations between the leaf and stem traits. Other fixed factors included in the saturated models were individual tree characteristics: height and DBH. Species were included as a random factor, accounting for seven tree species due to the exclusion of the palm Normanbya. All modelling was performed in R [45], using the package nlme [46] following a standard protocol for data exploration [47].

For each response variable, the most supported set of predictors was inferred using an Akaike’s information-theoretic approach [48] corrected for sample size, and the top five models which included >95% of Akaike weight are presented. To obtain a measure of relative support of each model combination, we also computed their Akaike weight w, which refers to the probability of a model combination being the best supported one among a given model set. Inferences were drawn based on all plausible models.

Results

Sapwood anatomical observations

With the exception of the palm, all the study species are eudicot trees with diffuse porous wood, and had light-coloured parenchyma tissue appearing either as bands of varying widths or in patches. Early-successional trees (Alstonia, Elaeocarpus; Fig 1A and 1B) have scattered vessels with relatively thin radial parenchyma bands. Mature-phase trees differ drastically in wood anatomy, particularly with reference to patterns of parenchyma-vessel association and vessel density. Endiandra (Fig 1E) and Myristica (Fig 1F) have solitary vessels, and irregularly-spaced bands of radial parenchyma. Argyrodendron, Castanospermum and Syzygium (Fig 1C, 1D and 1G respectively) has vessels distinctively associated with parenchyma. In the case of Castanospermum, the vessels are consistently encapsulated in patches of abundant parenchyma tissue (aliform parenchyma) which are sometimes confluent (Fig 1C). Notably also, Syzygium has the most densely-packed vessels among all the study species (Fig 1G). The vascular system of the single palm Normanbya differs drastically from those of the other functional groups, consisting of dark scattered vascular bundles within a matrix of light-coloured ground tissue. Each vascular bundle is comprised largely of dense fibres with a single large vessel is situated at the distal end (into trunk) (Fig 1H).

Download:

Fig 1. Contrasting wood anatomical features (a-h) of tropical lowland rainforest trees from Daintree, Australia.

Early successional trees (a) Alstonia scholaris and (b) Elaeocarpus angustifolius with light coloured wood and scattered vessels; mature-phase trees (c) Argyrodendron peralatum, (d) Castanospermum australe, (e) Endiandra microneura, (f) Myristica globosa, and (g) Syzygium graveolens with varying vessel and parenchyma arrangements, and; palm (h) Normanbya normanbyi with dark fiber bundles. The white scale bar in Syzygium equal 0.2 mm and serves for all images except for Normanbya where it equals 0.25mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.g001

Sapflow and Relative Growth

We observed differences among functional groups in maximum sap velocity but not within sap flow rate or annual basal area increment (Fig 2; S1 Table). Maximum sap velocity showed two distinct responses with low averages for the mature-phase species (Argyrodendron, Castanopermum, Endiandra and Myristica) and high sap velocities for the early-successional (Alstonia, Eleaocarpus), the palm and mature-phase Syzygium (One-way ANOVA: F_7,22 = 5.54, p < 0.001). High and low averages for max sap flow rates were recorded for both early successional and mature-phase species (F_7,22 = 4.436, p = 0.0033) respectively. Annual basal area increments were similar across all functional groups, except for remarkably high values for one early-successional tree (F_6,19 = 6.834, p < 0.001).

Download:

Fig 2. Means (±S.E) of sap flow measures and annual basal area increment of tropical lowland rainforest tree species from Daintree, Australia.

Species codes are as follows for early successional (yellow bars), mature-phase (blue bars) and palm species (maroon bars): Alstonia scholaris (ALS); Elaeocarpus angustifolius (ELA); Argyrodendron peralatum (ARG); Castanospermum australe (CAS); Endiandra microneura (END); Myristica globosa (MYR); Syzygium graveolens (SYZ); Normanbya normanbyi (NOR). The palm species NOR was excluded from the annual basal area increment graph as it does not exhibit secondary growth comparable with the other seven eudicot trees. One-way ANOVA F-values are given and significance levels are indicated by asterisks as follows: P<0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***. Numerator degrees of freedom and denominator error degrees of freedom are 7 and 22 respectively for sap flow measures and 6 and 19 respectively for annual basal area increment. Significant differences between species are indicated by different letters (Tukeys HSD, p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.g002

Stem traits

We observed differences among functional groups with the single palm species responding significantly differently from the early-successional and mature-phase trees in the following traits (Fig 3; S1 Table): vessel area (F_7,22 = 47.56, p < 0.001), vessel density (F_7,22 = 94.58, p < 0.001), vulnerability index (F_7,22 = 101.7, p < 0.001), and theoretical specific conductivity (F_7,22 = 18.86, p < 0.001). Not surprisingly, wood density differed significantly among early-successional, mature-phase and the palm species (F_7,22 = 87.26, p < 0.001). Sapwood area reflected tree size but no functional groups pattern (F_7,22 = 4.36, p = 0.004) and Huber value showed no difference across species (F_7,22 = 1.256, p = 0.316) and is not included in Fig 3.

Download:

Fig 3. Means (±S.E) of stem traits of tropical lowland rainforest tree species from Daintree, Australia.

Species and colour codes follows Fig 2. One-way ANOVA F-values are given and significance levels are indicated by asterisks as follows: P<0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***. Numerator degrees of freedom and denominator error degrees of freedom are 7 and 22 respectively for all variables. Significant differences between species are indicated by different letters (Tukeys HSD, p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.g003

Leaf traits

We observed few differences among functional groups in leaf traits (Fig 4; S1 Table). One mature-phase species had a significantly higher LMA than all other species (F_7,22 = 13.43, p < 0.001) and the single palm species distinctively different from other functional groups with respect to leaf slenderness (F_7,22 = 128.1, p < 0.001). Leaf thickness showed no difference across species (F_7,22 = 0.553, p = 0.785) and is not included in Fig 4.

Download:

Fig 4. Means (±S.E) of leaf traits of tropical lowland rainforest tree species from Daintree, Australia.

Species and colour codes follows Fig 2. One-way ANOVA F-values are given and significance levels are indicated by asterisks as follows: P<0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***. Numerator degrees of freedom and denominator error degrees of freedom are 7 and 22 respectively for all variables. Significant differences between species are indicated by different letters (Tukeys HSD, p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.g004

Coordination among functional traits and sap flow response modelling

We explored the coordination of functional traits across 30 rainforest trees (seven eudicot tree species and one palm species) using non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination analysis (NMDS). Two ordination axes collectively explained 86.5% of the total variation in the functional trait data set (Fig 5A). Axis 2, which captured 73.5% of the variation, clearly distinguished a gradient of early-successional, mature-phase and palm trees. This gradient showed the functional coordination of seven of the 14 water-use traits examined in this study (Fig 5A; Table 3), with low values for an early-successional species (Alstonia), moderate values for a group of mature-phase species (and one early-successional species) and high values for a palm species. The lack of interspecific variation among the five mature-phase species and one early-successional species along this axis is notable. Axis 1 explained 13% of the total variation and described a gradient among species that does not reflect obvious functional grouping but demonstrates an orthogonality between leaf volume (measured as LDMC) and maximum leaf water potential. Along the Axis 1 gradient, we observe interspecific clustering of trees within four mature-phase species, with the remaining four overlapping.

Download:

Fig 5. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordinations of traits of tropical lowland rainforest species including (a) and excluding (b) the palm species.

Traits and their abbreviations (in parentheses) include: vessel area, vessel density, *theoretical specific conductivity, wood density, leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf slenderness, minimum and maximum leaf water potentials (min Ψ_L, max Ψ_L respectively), intrinsic water-use-efficiency (WUE_i) and vulnerability index. Species symbols are as follows: Secondary-successional species – Alstonia scholaris (yellow circles); Elaeocarpus angustifolius (yellow inverted triangles); Mature-phase species – Argyrodendron peralatum (blue circles); Castanospermum australe (blue squares); Endiandra microneura (blue inverted triangles); Myristica globosa (blue diamonds); Syzygium graveolens (blue triangles), and; Palm – Normanbya normanbyi (maroon circles). The arrows by the axes indicate significant positive or negative Pearson correlations between individual traits and axes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.g005

Download:

Table 3. Pearson correlations for functional traits with two ordination axes produced by Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.t003

Palms lack sapwood and growth rings and are likely to be distinctly different from eudicot trees with respect to hydraulic architecture. Hence, we further explored the robustness of our functional coordination among traits, by considering only eudicot trees (26 individuals) in a second ordination analysis (Fig 5B). The second ordination explained 83% of the total variation in the data and showed remarkable similarities with the first (Fig 5B). Axis 2, distinguished a similar gradient from early successional to mature-phase species, capturing 53.5% of the total variation. We observed four of the seven functional traits that defined this gradient in the earlier ordination also coordinating and influencing the position of trees in this analysis (Table 3). Along this axis only an early successional species (Alstonia) showed interspecific variation, but most overlapped, demonstrating the natural variation within species and the importance of within species replication. Similarly, there was no interspecific variation detected among the species in Axis 1 which explained 29.5% of the variation and described a gradient of leaf water potential (maximum and minimum) and vessel fraction and density at one end, and vulnerability index at the other end. Interestingly, the individual tree identified as vulnerable is the largest individual on the one-hectare plot measuring 127 cm DBH.

Sap flow velocity and annual basal area increment were poorly predicted by stem and leaf traits as ordinated variables from NMDS and individual tree characteristics (DBH and height) when nested within species (Table 4). Sap flow velocity values were low and similar across four species and high and variable across three species (Fig 2), but these patterns were not reflected in the ordination gradients. With respect to annual basal area increment these were overall low and similar across six species and high in a single species (Elaeocarpus), also a pattern not reflected in the ordination axes or other functional traits examined.

Download:

Table 4. Top candidate models that predict mean maximum sap velocity and mean annual basal area increment across seven tropical lowland rainforest tree species in Daintree, northeast Australia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.t004

Discussion

In the wet lowland rainforests of northern Australia, we found a coordination of stem and leaf water-use characteristics that followed an ecological gradient in our species. We found seven traits (minimum leaf water potential, leaf slenderness, wood density, theoretical specific conductivity, vessel area and density, and vulnerability index) that were positively correlated with the gradient from early successional to mature-phase species to palm trees. Importantly among the five mature-phase species we studied, there was considerable trait variation within species and hence a marked lack of interspecific variation among species, which suggests the importance of replication within species for eco-physiological studies. Despite detectable differences in relative growth rates and sap flow values among some species, our data on the stem and leaf functional traits important for water transport were poor predictors in explaining this variation.

Various stem and leaf trait associations effect water transport in trees

Our species and individual trees were selected to span a range of wood density and tree size values in order to detect trait variations. We found large overlaps across species in maximum rates of sap flow and velocities across species, which may be expected for plants growing in the same environment [49, 50, 51]. Our linear mixed effects models showed that tree features and the functional coordination of stem and leaf traits were not good predictors of sap flow velocity and basal area incremental growth. One explanation for this lack of predictability is that the variation exhibited within species was greater or equal to the variation between species.

Our NMDS however, revealed various gradients and associations of traits that may reflect contrasting strategies in water transport traits. For instance, leaf carbon isotope ratios reflect a plant’s intrinsic water-use-efficiency (WUE_i) [43], and can differentiate early-successional from mature-phase species [52]. Indeed, WUE_i appears to segregate early-successional species Alstonia from the clustering of mature-phase species (Argyrodendron, Endiandra and Syzygium) (Fig 5).

In their multivariate analyses, Worbes et al. [11] showed leaf δ¹³C as having an analogous influence as vessel area, whereas we found an opposite relationship between vessel area and WUE_i (based on leaf δ¹³C). This disparity could reflect intrinsic differences in the adaptations to water deficit between the drier tropical forest type examined by Worbes et al. [11] and the humid tropical forest in the current study. In addition, Worbes et al. [11] sampled deciduous species, which were not represented in our sampled species.

A further potential coordination of leaf and stem traits was the relationships among leaf volume (dry matter content), minimum leaf water potential and theoretical specific conductivity from our ordinations. Similar reports of coordination between the stem and leaf economic spectra, was reported in Méndez-Alonzo et al. [32] and Kröber et al. [31] in tropical dry forest and in a common garden experiment respectively. We hypothesised that a high vessel area or vessel density may be associated with large stem water storage capacity, which may in turn lead to a less negative maximum and minimum water potential (Ψ_L). For tropical deciduous species, Worbes et al [11] reported that vessel size and density are linked to the most negative Ψ_L values as the driving force for water transport. Other traits such as leaf vein [53] and stomatal densities [54] may contain more relevant information for establishing the link between the leaf and stem economic spectra and therefore deserve measuring in future studies.

Trait strategies for water transport and drought resistance

Water transport and drought resistance involves a complex interplay of physiological processes [40, 55, 56], intrinsic tree architectural factors (e.g. xylem tapering) [57] and environmental factors (e.g. soil moisture, seasonality, vapour pressure deficits) [58] that we were unable to fully account for or measure. Nevertheless, we can summarize from the available data the water transport strategies and discuss empirically the potential drought resistance of our study species with relevance to their functional groups.

The early-successional species (Alstonia, Elaeocarpus) have relatively high WUE_i and low VIs, which suggests a relatively high drought tolerance relative to the other study species. These trait combinations may also allow these species to be in exposed habitats experiencing larger vapour pressure deficits (VPDs) whilst minimizing embolism risk. These species also tended to have higher maximum sap velocities, possibly reflecting their exposure to larger VPDs and light levels in more exposed environments characteristic of early-successional species.

The studied mature-phase species exhibited some observable variations in trait strategies. The mature-phase tree Castanospermum had intermediate wood density, high WUE_i values, the largest sapwood area, and was associated with the highest VIs of the eudicot trees. Conspicuously, the wood anatomy of Castanospermum was unique in having significant portions of parenchyma surrounding the vessels and this appears to be a common trait in trees from the Fabaceae [59, 60]. Borchett and Pockman [61] suggest that such anatomical features buffer the stem from abrupt water pressure changes during water loss or gain. Therefore, the high VI in Castanospermum may be compensated by having large quantities of sapwood water storage that can be utilized to repair embolisms [56, 62, 63], or to mitigate against the development of low xylem water potentials. Such a feature suggests a drought-avoiding rather than drought-resisting strategy for this species [21].

The mature-phase canopy species Endiandra and Argyrodendron had among the lowest annual basal area increments, relatively low sap velocities and maximum rates of sap flow, low WUE_i values, and relatively high VIs. This reflects a potentially low drought resistance. However, the conspicuous vessel-parenchyma association in Argyrodendron suggests that this species has higher water storage and possibly better ability to cope with drought than Endiandra. The sub-canopy tree Myristica had relatively low sap velocities and annual basal area increment, probably reflecting the low-light environment and low vapour pressure deficit that occurs in the sub-canopy of closed forests. However, it has intermediate WUE_i values and VIs, which might reflect the reduced evaporative demands [64] of being in the forest sub-canopy.

Surprisingly, we found a relatively high sap velocity and maximum rate of sap flow, moderate WUE_i, and also extremely low VI (due to the high vessel packing per unit area) and the largest vessel density and vessel fraction in the mature-phase tree Syzygium. Such low VIs would be expected to appear in taxa of xerophytic environments [24] but ironically in Syzygium, this high vessel packing per unit area may confer greater physiological safety to drought than one with wider and fewer vessels. Such a strategy could work by restricting air embolisms to smaller and more localized sections of the sap flow column in the event of in high VPDs during a drought event [24, 65]. However, this may also compromise the species hydraulic efficiency via increased resistance to water transport [17, 66].

Our only sample of a palm, Normanbya, had stem, vessel, and leaf traits that differed drastically from species of other functional groups. From these observations and on the basis of well documented differences between the hydraulic architecture of palm and eudicot trees [67], we can infer a drastically different water transport and drought resistance strategy for Normanbya from our other eudicot study species. Unlike eudicot trees, palms lack of sapwood and growth rings, and the arrangement of the vascular system is predetermined [68]. The relatively high WUE_i, high sap velocity and large vessel areas relative to our eudicot study species, suggests that Normanbya has a very efficient hydraulic system to maintain a large conducting capacity with a minimal vascular investment [67], especially where water is not limiting. However, these characteristics also suggest that this species will be vulnerable to droughts.

Conclusion

Increased incidence and durations of drought are predicted scenarios for the future of lowland tropical rainforest, and underpins the importance of understanding the strategies that rainforest trees may use to cope with such conditions. Studying trees representing different functional groups, we found, with some differences, little variation in maximum sap velocities and rates of sap flow across species. We have demonstrated however within and across functional groups, that tropical lowland rainforest trees exhibit variable trait strategies for water transport. This is achieved through various associative extents in stem and leaf traits. In particular, quantitative wood anatomical features (vessel areas and densities) have a bearing on plant water transport and should therefore be examined as an informative trait in field-based ecophysiological studies involving the measurement of sap flow. Also, quantitative studies on vessel traits in conjunction with physiological measures can provide useful metrics for estimating a species drought resistance. This information will serve as an important context for an ongoing rainfall exclusion experiment in place, and will complement our understanding of changing species distributions of rainforest trees under various climate change scenarios.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Sap flow, growth, and leaf and stem trait values of eight tropical lowland rainforest tree species, Daintree, Australia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

James Cook University fostered this research through their research station—the Daintree Rainforest Observatory. We thank Andrew Thompson for operating the crane for sampling, and Peter Byrnes for site access; Alex Chessman, Edison Salas Castelo, Jaime Huther assisted with fieldwork; Tom Burkot for permission to use laboratory equipment, Tobin Northfield for advice on statistical analysis, and; Lucas Cernusak, Jon Lloyd and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments on the manuscript. The study was conducted during an external Ph.D candidature of one of us (DMGA).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SGWL JH DYPT FYI. Performed the experiments: DMGA DYPT MJL FYI RR SGWL. Analyzed the data: DMGA SGWL DE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DE RMS. Wrote the paper: DMGA DYPT SGWL DE.

References

1. Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Hegerl GC. Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Climate. 2007;20: 1419–1444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4066.1
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Giorgi F, Coppola E, Raffaele F. A consistent picture of the hydroclimatic response to global warming from multiple indices: models and observations, J Geophys Res-Oc Atm. 2014;119: 11,695–11,708.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Sherwood S, Fu S. A Drier Future? Science. 2014;343: 737–739. pmid:24531959
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Phillips OL, Aragão LEOC, Lewis SL, Fisher JB, Lloyd J, López-González G, et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science. 2009;323: 1344–1347. pmid:19265020
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Zwieniecki MA, Secchi F. Threats to xylem hydraulic function of trees under ‘new climate normal’ conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12412
6. Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, et al. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature. 2007;447: 80–83. pmid:17476266
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Zelazowski P, Malhi Y, Huntingford C, Sitch S, Fisher JB. Changes in the potential distribution of humid tropical forests on a warmer planet. Philos T R Soc A. 2011;369: 137–60.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Smith DM, Allen SJ. Measurement of sap flow in plant stems. J. Exp. Bot. 1996;47: 1833–1844.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol. 1998;18: 499–512. pmid:12651336
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Schuldt B, Leuschner C, Horna V, Moser G, Köhler M, van Straaten O, et al. Change in hydraulic properties and leaf traits in a tall rainforest tree species subjected to long-term throughfall exclusion in the perhumid tropics. BGeo. 2011;8: 2179–2194.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Worbes M, Blanchart S, Fichter E. Relations between water balance, wood traits and phenological behavior of tree species from a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica—a multifactorial study. Tree Physiol. 2013;33: 527–536. pmid:23629581
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot. 2013;61: 167–234.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Vertessy RA, Benyon RG, O'sullivan SK, Gribben PR. Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. Tree Physiol. 1995;15: 559–567. pmid:14965913
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta‐analysis. New Phytol. 2009;182: 565–588. pmid:19434804
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Niinemets Ü. Research review. Components of leaf dry mass per area—thickness and density—alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytol. 1999;144: 35–47.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Machado JL, Tyree MT. Patterns of hydraulic architecture and water relations of two tropical canopy trees with contrasting leaf phonologies: Ochroma pyramidale and Pseudobombax septenatum. Tree Physiol. 1994;14: 219–240. pmid:14967698
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ewersä FW, Davis SD. Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. New Phytol. 2007;174: 787–798. pmid:17504462
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA, Davis SD. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiol. 2005;139: 546–556. pmid:16100359
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA. Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia. 2001;126: 457–461.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Falster DS, Westoby M. Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia. J Ecol. 2005;93: 521–535.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Zheng J, Martínez-Cabrera HI. Wood anatomical correlates with theoretical conductivity and wood density across China: evolutionary evidence of the functional differentiation of axial and radial parenchyma. Ann Bot. 2013;112: 927–935. pmid:23904446
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Fortunel C, Ruelle J, Beauchêne J, Fine PVA, Baraloto C. Wood specific gravity and anatomy of branches and roots in 113 Amazonian rainforest tree species across environmental gradients. New Phytol. 2014;202: 79–94. pmid:24329812
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Tyree MT, Ewers FW. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol. 1991;119: 345–360.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Dickison WC. Integrative plant anatomy. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.
25. Zanne AE, Westoby M, Falster DS, Ackerly DD, Loarie SR, Arnold SJ, et al. Angiosperm wood structure: global patterns in vessel anatomy and their relation to wood density and potential conductivity. Am J Bot. 2010;92: 207–215.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Gleason SM, Butler DW, Ziemińska K, Waryszak P, Westoby M. Stem xylem conductivity is key to plant water balance across Australian angiosperm species. Funct Ecol. 2012;26: 343–352.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Eamus D, Prior L. Ecophysiology of trees of seasonally dry tropics: comparisons among phenologies. Adv Ecol Res. 2001;32: 113–197.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Buckley TN, Roberts DW. How should leaf area, sapwood area and stomatal conductance vary with tree height to maximize growth? Tree Physiol. 2006;26: 145–157. pmid:16356911
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Améglio T. Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann For Sci. 2002;59: 723–752.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Sterck F, Markesteijn L, Schieving F, Poorter L. Functional traits determine trade-offs and niches in a tropical forest community. PNAS. 2011;108: 20627–20632. pmid:22106283
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Kröber W, Zhang S, Ehmig M, Bruelheide H. Linking xylem hydraulic conductivity and vulnerability to the Leaf Economics Spectrum — a cross-species study of 39 evergreen and deciduous broadleaved subtropical tree species. PLoS One. 2014;9: e109211. pmid:25423316
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Méndez-Alonzo R, Paz H, Zuluaga RC, Rosell JA, Olson ME. Coordinated evolution of leaf and stem economics in tropical dry forest trees. Ecology. 2012;93: 2397–2406. pmid:23236911
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Goosem S, Tucker NIJ. Repairing the rainforest. 2nd ed. Cairns: Wet Tropics Management Authority and Biotropica Australia; 2013.
34. Silvertown J, Dodd M. Comparing plants and connecting traits. In: Silvertown J, Franco M, editors. Plant Life Histories—Ecology, Phylogeny and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. pp. 3–16.
35. Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, Beverly CR, Ong CK, Khan AAH, et al. An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. Tree Physiol. 2001;21: 589–598. pmid:11390303
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Burgess S, Downey A. SFM1 Sap Flow Meter Manual. 2014. Available: http://www.ictinternational.com/content/uploads/2014/03/SFM1-complete-manual1.pdf. Accessed 2014 Nov 5.
37. Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Data Online. Available: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/index.shtml. Accessed 2015 May 22.
38. GIMP 2.8. GIMP—The GNU Image Manipulation Program. 2014. Available: http://www.gimp.org. Accessed 2014 August 21.
39. Carlquist S. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. American Journal of Botany.1977;64: 887–896.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Barlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2012;15: 393–405. pmid:22435987
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. De Costa WAJM, Abeysinghe WAMWKSB, Chandrapala AG. Relationship between stomatal conductance and leaf water potential in selected forest tree species growing under different levels of natural shade in the mid-country wet zone. J Natl Sci Found Sri. 2000;28: 63–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Kueffer C, Schumacher E, Fleischmann K, Edwards PJ, Dietz H. Strong below-ground competition shapes tree regeneration in invasive Cinnamomum verum forests. J Ecol. 2007;95: 273–282.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Werner C, Schnyder H, Cuntz M, Keitel C, Zeeman MJ, Dawson TE, et al. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales. BGeo. 2012;9: 3083–3111.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. McCune B, Mefford MJ. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design; 1999.
45. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2009. Available: http://www.RProject.org.
46. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 2000.
47. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1: 3–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2002.
49. Meinzer FC. Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia. 2003;134: 1–11. pmid:12647172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Andrade JL. Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: Do universal rules apply? Tree Physiol. 2001;21: 19–26. pmid:11260820
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. O'Brien JJ, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB. Whole tree xylem sap flow responses to multiple environmental variables in a wet tropical forest. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2004;27: 551–567.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Bonal D, Born C, Brechet C, Coste S, Marcon E, Roggy JC, et al. The successional status of tropical rainforest tree species is associated with differences in leaf carbon isotope discrimination and functional traits. Ann Sci. 2007;64: 169–176.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Sack L, Scoffoni C, John GP, Poorter H, Mason CM. How do leaf veins influence the worldwide leaf economic spectrum? Review and synthesis. J Exp Bot. 2013;64: 4053–4080. pmid:24123455
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Viola R, Körner C, Amthor JS. Stomatal numbers, leaf and canopy conductance, and the control of transpiration. PNAS. 2011;108: E275. pmid:21700887
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Whitehead D. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiol. 1998;18: 633–644. pmid:12651352
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Pineda-García F, Paz H, Meinzer FC. Drought resistance in early and late secondary successional species from a tropical dry forest: the interplay between xylem resistance to embolism, sapwood water storage and leaf shedding. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36: 405–418. pmid:22812458
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. James SA, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Woodruff D, Jones TJ, Restom T, et al. Axial and radial water transport and internal water storage in tropical forest canopy trees. Oecologia. 2003;134: 37–45. pmid:12647177
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Horna V, Schuldt B, Brix , Leuschner C. Environment and tree size controlling stem sap flux in a perhumid tropical forest of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ann For Sci. 2011;68: 1027–1038.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Kynaston WT, Eccles DB, Hopewell GP. Timber species notes. 2nd ed. Queensland: Department of Primary Industries; 1994.
60. Azim AAA, Okada N. Occurrence and anatomical features of growth rings in tropical rainforest trees in Peninsular Malaysia: a preliminary study. Tropics. 2014;23: 15–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Borchert R, Pockman WT. Water storage capacitance and xylem tension in isolated branches of temperate and tropical trees. Tree Physiol. 2005;25: 457–466. pmid:15687094
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Borchert R. Water storage in soil or tree stems determines phenology and distribution of tropical dry forest trees. Ecology. 1994;75: 1437–1449.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Goldstein G, Andrade JL, Meinzer FC, Holbrook NM, Cavelier J, Jackson P, et al. Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees. Plant Cell Environ.1998;21: 397–406.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Motzer T, Munz N, Kűppers M, Schmitt D, Anhuf D. Stomatal conductance, transpiration and sap flow of tropical montane rain forest trees in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Tree Physiol. 2005;25:1283–1293. pmid:16076777
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Baas P, Ewers FW, Davis SD, Wheeler EA. Evolution of xylem physiology. In: Hemsley AR, Poole I, editors. The Evolution of Plant Physiology. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. pp. 273–295.
66. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Wheeler JK, Castro L. Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. Tree Physiol. 2006;26: 689–701. pmid:16510385
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Renninger HJ, McCulloh KA, Phillips N. A comparison of the hydraulic efficiency of a palm species (Iriartea deltoidea) with other wood types. Tree Physiol. 2012;33: 152–160. pmid:22227984
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Tomlinson PB, Horn JW, Fisher JB. The Anatomy of Palms. Arecaceae—Palmae. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

[ref1] 1. Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Hegerl GC. Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Climate. 2007;20: 1419–1444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4066.1
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Giorgi F, Coppola E, Raffaele F. A consistent picture of the hydroclimatic response to global warming from multiple indices: models and observations, J Geophys Res-Oc Atm. 2014;119: 11,695–11,708.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sherwood S, Fu S. A Drier Future? Science. 2014;343: 737–739. pmid:24531959
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] PubMed/NCBI

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Phillips OL, Aragão LEOC, Lewis SL, Fisher JB, Lloyd J, López-González G, et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science. 2009;323: 1344–1347. pmid:19265020
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Zwieniecki MA, Secchi F. Threats to xylem hydraulic function of trees under ‘new climate normal’ conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12412

[ref6] 6. Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, et al. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature. 2007;447: 80–83. pmid:17476266
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Zelazowski P, Malhi Y, Huntingford C, Sitch S, Fisher JB. Changes in the potential distribution of humid tropical forests on a warmer planet. Philos T R Soc A. 2011;369: 137–60.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Smith DM, Allen SJ. Measurement of sap flow in plant stems. J. Exp. Bot. 1996;47: 1833–1844.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol. 1998;18: 499–512. pmid:12651336
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Schuldt B, Leuschner C, Horna V, Moser G, Köhler M, van Straaten O, et al. Change in hydraulic properties and leaf traits in a tall rainforest tree species subjected to long-term throughfall exclusion in the perhumid tropics. BGeo. 2011;8: 2179–2194.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Worbes M, Blanchart S, Fichter E. Relations between water balance, wood traits and phenological behavior of tree species from a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica—a multifactorial study. Tree Physiol. 2013;33: 527–536. pmid:23629581
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot. 2013;61: 167–234.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Vertessy RA, Benyon RG, O'sullivan SK, Gribben PR. Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. Tree Physiol. 1995;15: 559–567. pmid:14965913
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta‐analysis. New Phytol. 2009;182: 565–588. pmid:19434804
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Niinemets Ü. Research review. Components of leaf dry mass per area—thickness and density—alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytol. 1999;144: 35–47.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Machado JL, Tyree MT. Patterns of hydraulic architecture and water relations of two tropical canopy trees with contrasting leaf phonologies: Ochroma pyramidale and Pseudobombax septenatum. Tree Physiol. 1994;14: 219–240. pmid:14967698
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ewersä FW, Davis SD. Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. New Phytol. 2007;174: 787–798. pmid:17504462
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA, Davis SD. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiol. 2005;139: 546–556. pmid:16100359
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA. Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia. 2001;126: 457–461.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Falster DS, Westoby M. Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia. J Ecol. 2005;93: 521–535.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Zheng J, Martínez-Cabrera HI. Wood anatomical correlates with theoretical conductivity and wood density across China: evolutionary evidence of the functional differentiation of axial and radial parenchyma. Ann Bot. 2013;112: 927–935. pmid:23904446
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Fortunel C, Ruelle J, Beauchêne J, Fine PVA, Baraloto C. Wood specific gravity and anatomy of branches and roots in 113 Amazonian rainforest tree species across environmental gradients. New Phytol. 2014;202: 79–94. pmid:24329812
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Tyree MT, Ewers FW. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol. 1991;119: 345–360.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Dickison WC. Integrative plant anatomy. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.

[ref25] 25. Zanne AE, Westoby M, Falster DS, Ackerly DD, Loarie SR, Arnold SJ, et al. Angiosperm wood structure: global patterns in vessel anatomy and their relation to wood density and potential conductivity. Am J Bot. 2010;92: 207–215.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Gleason SM, Butler DW, Ziemińska K, Waryszak P, Westoby M. Stem xylem conductivity is key to plant water balance across Australian angiosperm species. Funct Ecol. 2012;26: 343–352.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Eamus D, Prior L. Ecophysiology of trees of seasonally dry tropics: comparisons among phenologies. Adv Ecol Res. 2001;32: 113–197.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Buckley TN, Roberts DW. How should leaf area, sapwood area and stomatal conductance vary with tree height to maximize growth? Tree Physiol. 2006;26: 145–157. pmid:16356911
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Améglio T. Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann For Sci. 2002;59: 723–752.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Sterck F, Markesteijn L, Schieving F, Poorter L. Functional traits determine trade-offs and niches in a tropical forest community. PNAS. 2011;108: 20627–20632. pmid:22106283
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Kröber W, Zhang S, Ehmig M, Bruelheide H. Linking xylem hydraulic conductivity and vulnerability to the Leaf Economics Spectrum — a cross-species study of 39 evergreen and deciduous broadleaved subtropical tree species. PLoS One. 2014;9: e109211. pmid:25423316
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Méndez-Alonzo R, Paz H, Zuluaga RC, Rosell JA, Olson ME. Coordinated evolution of leaf and stem economics in tropical dry forest trees. Ecology. 2012;93: 2397–2406. pmid:23236911
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Goosem S, Tucker NIJ. Repairing the rainforest. 2nd ed. Cairns: Wet Tropics Management Authority and Biotropica Australia; 2013.

[ref34] 34. Silvertown J, Dodd M. Comparing plants and connecting traits. In: Silvertown J, Franco M, editors. Plant Life Histories—Ecology, Phylogeny and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. pp. 3–16.

[ref35] 35. Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, Beverly CR, Ong CK, Khan AAH, et al. An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. Tree Physiol. 2001;21: 589–598. pmid:11390303
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Burgess S, Downey A. SFM1 Sap Flow Meter Manual. 2014. Available: http://www.ictinternational.com/content/uploads/2014/03/SFM1-complete-manual1.pdf. Accessed 2014 Nov 5.

[ref37] 37. Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Data Online. Available: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/index.shtml. Accessed 2015 May 22.

[ref38] 38. GIMP 2.8. GIMP—The GNU Image Manipulation Program. 2014. Available: http://www.gimp.org. Accessed 2014 August 21.

[ref39] 39. Carlquist S. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. American Journal of Botany.1977;64: 887–896.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Barlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2012;15: 393–405. pmid:22435987
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. De Costa WAJM, Abeysinghe WAMWKSB, Chandrapala AG. Relationship between stomatal conductance and leaf water potential in selected forest tree species growing under different levels of natural shade in the mid-country wet zone. J Natl Sci Found Sri. 2000;28: 63–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Kueffer C, Schumacher E, Fleischmann K, Edwards PJ, Dietz H. Strong below-ground competition shapes tree regeneration in invasive Cinnamomum verum forests. J Ecol. 2007;95: 273–282.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Werner C, Schnyder H, Cuntz M, Keitel C, Zeeman MJ, Dawson TE, et al. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales. BGeo. 2012;9: 3083–3111.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. McCune B, Mefford MJ. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design; 1999.

[ref45] 45. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2009. Available: http://www.RProject.org.

[ref46] 46. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 2000.

[ref47] 47. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1: 3–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2002.

[ref49] 49. Meinzer FC. Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia. 2003;134: 1–11. pmid:12647172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Andrade JL. Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: Do universal rules apply? Tree Physiol. 2001;21: 19–26. pmid:11260820
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. O'Brien JJ, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB. Whole tree xylem sap flow responses to multiple environmental variables in a wet tropical forest. Plant, Cell & Environ. 2004;27: 551–567.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bonal D, Born C, Brechet C, Coste S, Marcon E, Roggy JC, et al. The successional status of tropical rainforest tree species is associated with differences in leaf carbon isotope discrimination and functional traits. Ann Sci. 2007;64: 169–176.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Sack L, Scoffoni C, John GP, Poorter H, Mason CM. How do leaf veins influence the worldwide leaf economic spectrum? Review and synthesis. J Exp Bot. 2013;64: 4053–4080. pmid:24123455
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Viola R, Körner C, Amthor JS. Stomatal numbers, leaf and canopy conductance, and the control of transpiration. PNAS. 2011;108: E275. pmid:21700887
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Whitehead D. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiol. 1998;18: 633–644. pmid:12651352
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Pineda-García F, Paz H, Meinzer FC. Drought resistance in early and late secondary successional species from a tropical dry forest: the interplay between xylem resistance to embolism, sapwood water storage and leaf shedding. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36: 405–418. pmid:22812458
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. James SA, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Woodruff D, Jones TJ, Restom T, et al. Axial and radial water transport and internal water storage in tropical forest canopy trees. Oecologia. 2003;134: 37–45. pmid:12647177
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Horna V, Schuldt B, Brix , Leuschner C. Environment and tree size controlling stem sap flux in a perhumid tropical forest of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ann For Sci. 2011;68: 1027–1038.
View Article
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Kynaston WT, Eccles DB, Hopewell GP. Timber species notes. 2nd ed. Queensland: Department of Primary Industries; 1994.

[ref60] 60. Azim AAA, Okada N. Occurrence and anatomical features of growth rings in tropical rainforest trees in Peninsular Malaysia: a preliminary study. Tropics. 2014;23: 15–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Borchert R, Pockman WT. Water storage capacitance and xylem tension in isolated branches of temperate and tropical trees. Tree Physiol. 2005;25: 457–466. pmid:15687094
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] PubMed/NCBI

[185] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Borchert R. Water storage in soil or tree stems determines phenology and distribution of tropical dry forest trees. Ecology. 1994;75: 1437–1449.
View Article
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Goldstein G, Andrade JL, Meinzer FC, Holbrook NM, Cavelier J, Jackson P, et al. Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees. Plant Cell Environ.1998;21: 397–406.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Motzer T, Munz N, Kűppers M, Schmitt D, Anhuf D. Stomatal conductance, transpiration and sap flow of tropical montane rain forest trees in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Tree Physiol. 2005;25:1283–1293. pmid:16076777
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Baas P, Ewers FW, Davis SD, Wheeler EA. Evolution of xylem physiology. In: Hemsley AR, Poole I, editors. The Evolution of Plant Physiology. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. pp. 273–295.

[ref66] 66. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Wheeler JK, Castro L. Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. Tree Physiol. 2006;26: 689–701. pmid:16510385
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Renninger HJ, McCulloh KA, Phillips N. A comparison of the hydraulic efficiency of a palm species (Iriartea deltoidea) with other wood types. Tree Physiol. 2012;33: 152–160. pmid:22227984
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Tomlinson PB, Horn JW, Fisher JB. The Anatomy of Palms. Arecaceae—Palmae. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Study site and species

Traits

Data Analyses

Results

Sapwood anatomical observations

Sapflow and Relative Growth

Stem traits

Leaf traits

Coordination among functional traits and sap flow response modelling

Discussion

Various stem and leaf trait associations effect water transport in trees

Trait strategies for water transport and drought resistance

Conclusion

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Sap flow, growth, and leaf and stem trait values of eight tropical lowland rainforest tree species, Daintree, Australia.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References