Altered Interactions between the Gut Microbiome and Colonic Mucosa Precede Polyposis in APCMin/+ Mice

Joshua S. Son; Shanawaj Khair; Donald W. Pettet III; Nengtai Ouyang; Xinyu Tian; Yuanhao Zhang; Wei Zhu; Gerardo G. Mackenzie; Charles E. Robertson; Diana Ir; Daniel N. Frank; Basil Rigas; Ellen Li

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127985

Abstract

Mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC gene), an early event in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, is present in 70-80% of sporadic human colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. To test the hypothesis that mutation of the APC gene alters microbial interactions with host intestinal mucosa prior to the development of polyposis, culture-independent methods (targeted qPCR assays and Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1V2 hypervariable region) were used to compare the intestinal microbial composition of 30 six-week old C57BL/6 APC^Min/+ and 30 congenic wild type (WT) mice. The results demonstrate that similar to 12-14 week old APC^Min/+ mice with intestinal neoplasia, 6 week old APC^Min/+ mice with no detectable neoplasia, exhibit an increased relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp in the colon. Parallel mouse RNA sequence analysis, conducted on a subset of proximal colonic RNA samples (6 APC^Min/+, 6 WT) revealed 130 differentially expressed genes (DEGs, fold change ≥ 2, FDR <0.05). Hierarchical clustering of the DEGs was carried out by using 1-r dissimilarity measurement, where r stands for the Pearson correlation, and Ward minimum variance linkage, in order to reduce the number of input variables. When the cluster centroids (medians) were included along with APC genotype as input variables in a negative binomial (NB) regression model, four of seven mouse gene clusters, in addition to APC genotype, were significantly associated with the increased relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. Three of the four clusters include several downregulated genes encoding immunoglobulin variable regions and non-protein coding RNAs. These results support the concept that mutation of the APC gene alters colonic-microbial interactions prior to polyposis. It remains to be determined whether interventions directed at ameliorating dysbiosis in APC^Min/+mice, such as through probiotics, prebiotics or antibiotics, could reduce tumor formation.

Citation: Son JS, Khair S, Pettet DW III, Ouyang N, Tian X, Zhang Y, et al. (2015) Altered Interactions between the Gut Microbiome and Colonic Mucosa Precede Polyposis in APC^Min/+ Mice. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985

Editor: Markus M. Heimesaat, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, GERMANY

Received: December 23, 2014; Accepted: April 21, 2015; Published: June 29, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Son et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper. Raw 16S rRNA gene sequence data are deposited in NCBI Short Read Archive under BioProject Assession Number: PRJNA270112 (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA270112). The RNA-Sequence data are deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus database with accession number GSE67634.

Funding: This work was supported by 269010 Simons Foundation (www.simonsfoundation.org). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Alterations in the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) have been reported in human colonic neoplasia [1–6]. However it remains unclear as to whether dysbiosis represents a response to tumorigenesis or whether it precedes tumor formation. One of the most prominent genetic mutations associated with the pathogenesis of sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancers (CRC) lies in the tumor suppressing adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene [7–13]. A germ-line mutation of the APC gene causes familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), which results in the development of multiple colorectal adenomas at an early age that unequivocally lead to CRC if no surgical interventions are taken. APC mutations also represent an early event in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence and are present in about 70–80% of sporadic human colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

The multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mouse model of FAP carries a truncation mutation at codon 850 of the Apc gene [14]. Studies comparing the number of intestinal polyps in germ-free and conventionally raised C57Bl/6 APC^Min/+ mice suggest that the gut microbiome may promote development of intestinal neoplasia [15, 16]. One study reported decreased incidence of polyps in only the mid small intestinal segment, however a subsequent study reported a significant reduction of intestinal adenomas in both the small and large intestine of germ-free mice compared with conventionally raised mice. Antibiotic treatment of C57BL/6 APC^Min/+MSH2^-/-mice, which carry both the APC mutation and an HNPCC DNA mismatch repair mutation, reduced the number of polyps in both the small and large intestine [17].

We hypothesize that mutation of the APC gene results in alterations in host-microbiota interactions prior to tumor formation. To test this hypothesis, gut microbial composition was compared between 6 week-old C57Bl/6 APC^Min/+, prior to the development of detectable neoplasia [18], and congenic WT mice.

Materials and Methods

Animal Type and Housing

All of the mice were acclimated for two weeks in order to reduce stress from traveling. Carbon dioxide was used during euthanasia of the mice. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#202449) and Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at Stony Brook University. Three shipments of 10 four-week-old female C57BL/6J APC^Min/+ and 10 four-week-old female C57BL/6J WT mice were received from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) between June 2012 and May 2013. APC^Min/+ mice and WT mice were housed separately in groups of three to four in specific pathogen free (SPF) cages for two weeks prior to euthanization. All the experiments strictly followed guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at Stony Brook University.

Tissue and Luminal Content Sample Collection

All of the mice were euthanized at 6 weeks of age using carbon dioxide. Immediately after sacrifice, the gastrointestinal tract was divided along its cephalocaudal axis as previously described [19]. The segments analyzed included the ileum, cecum, proximal colon, and distal colon. Each small intestinal segment was washed in sterile phosphate buffered saline to remove the luminal content. A 1.0–1.5-cm section was obtained from the proximal ends of duodenum, jejunum, distal ends of ileum, proximal colon, and distal colon, and placed into RNAlater solution (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) for RNA/DNA studies. The cecum was placed in its entirety in RNAlater. Three pellets of distal colonic luminal content (formed stool) were collected from the distal colon and stored in RNAlater. All the samples were kept at room temperature overnight and then stored in -80°C. In the first cohort, the remainder of each intestinal segment was processed into “swiss rolls” and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histological analyses. In the second and third cohort, the remainder of each intestinal segment was stained with 0.25% methylene blue and inspected under a dissecting microscope for adenomas and aberrant crypt foci [20]. Stools were collected from nine 12–14 week APC^Min\+ female mice with intestinal neoplasia [18] and six WT female mice, and placed into RNAlater.

DNA and RNA Extraction of Intestinal Tissue and Luminal Content Samples

Total RNA and DNA, (host and associated bacterial mixed community) were extracted from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecal pouch, proximal colon and distal colon tissues using TRI Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For distal colonic luminal content samples, DNA was extracted using the UltraClean Fecal Kit (Mo BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA).

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for targeted bacterial clades

QPCR assays were performed using established primers for Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas [21], Lachnospiraceae [21], and total bacteria [22] on all tissue and distal colonic luminal content samples as previously described [23, 24]. The relative abundance of taxa within the Bacteroidetes phylum measured by ΔCt = Ct (threshold cycle)_{total bacteria} - Ct_{Bacteroides–Prevotella–Porphyromonas}. The relative abundance of taxa within the Lachnospiraceae clade (i.e., Clostridia Group Xi’an clade) was measured by ΔCt = Ct (threshold cycle)_{total bacteria} - Ct_{Lachnospiraceae} as previously described [23, 24]. All assays were carried out in triplicate. Plasmid quantification standards were prepared from representative clones of the target organisms. The Mann-Whitney test using GraphPad Prism 5 (La Jolla, California) was performed to compare APC^Min/+ and WT ΔCt values. The Bonferroni correction was made to correct for multiple comparison, thus significance required p< 0.025.

16S rRNA Amplicon Library Construction and Illumina V1V2 Sequencing Analysis

Bacterial profiles were determined by broad-range amplification and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes following our previously described methods [25, 26]. In brief, amplicons were generated using primers that target approximately 300 bp. of the V1V2 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene (primers 8F and 338R, modified by addition of Illumina adapter and dual index sequences). PCR products were normalized using a SequalPrep kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), pooled, lyophilized, purified and concentrated using a DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymo, Irvine, CA). Pooled amplicons was quantified using Qubit Fluorometer 2.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The pool was diluted to 4nM and denatured with 0.2 N NaOH at room temperature. The denatured DNA was diluted to 15pM and spiked with 25% of the Illumina PhiX control DNA prior to loading the sequencer. Illumina paired-end sequencing was performed on the Miseq platform with version v2.3.0.8 of the Miseq Control Software and version v2.3.32 of MiSeq Reporter, using a 600 cycle version 3 reagent kit.

Paired-end sequences were sorted by sample via barcodes in the paired reads with a python script [25]. Sorted paired end sequence data were deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive under BioProject Accession Number: PRJNA270112 (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA270112)PRJNA270112. The sorted paired reads were assembled using phrap [27, 28] and paired reads that did not assemble were discarded. Assembled sequence ends were trimmed over a moving window of 5 nucleotides until average quality met or exceeded 20. Trimmed contigs with more than 1 ambiguity or shorter than 200 nt were discarded. Potential chimeras identified with Uchime (usearch6.0.203_i86linux32) [29] using the Schloss [30] Silva reference sequences were removed from subsequent analyses. Assembled sequences were aligned and classified with SINA (1.2.11) using the 418,497 bacterial sequences in Silva 115NR99 as reference configured to yield the Silva taxonomy [31, 32]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were produced by clustering sequences with identical taxonomic assignments. OTU counts were normalized between samples by dividing sequence counts by the total number of sequences generated per sample. Phylum-level and family-level OTU tables were generated by collapsing lower level OTUs into higher-level categories. OTUs with a relative abundance <0.0001 and with a prevalence <0.01 were culled and relative abundances then transformed using the square root function [33]. The software package Explicet (v2.9.4, www.explicet.org) was used to display OTU data and estimate alpha diversity indices (i.e., S_Chao1, Shannon complexity [H], and Shannon Evenness [H/H_max]) through 1000 replicate samplings of rarefied datasets [34].

Comparisons of individual phyla and families passing the initial filtering step, were conducted as follows. Because of the commonly observed over-dispersion in microbiome count data [35], the effects of APC^Min/+ genotype on individual OTU abundances were examined using the negative binomial (NB) regression model as follows: Y_ijk denotes the OTU k’s observed count for mouse j in shipment i, μ_ijk is the mean parameter for OTU k’s count distribution of mouse j in shipment I and ϕ_k is the dispersion parameter. Shipment refers to three different deliveries of mice (mice 1–20, mice 21–40 and mice 41–60), which has a zero-mean random coefficient. Coefficients b₀ and β₁ are fixed constant representing grand mean and APC genotype respectively. The log total sequence count for each mouse is considered as an offset. In addition, the skewness of the distribution of low abundance OTUs causes a large proportion of zero counts. Therefore, a zero-inflated version of the negative binomial (NB) model is also fitted to OTUs with zero counts in additional to the NB model:

The NB and zero-inflated NB models are chosen based on AIC criterion [36]. The p values for the genotype effects on each OTU were then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg [37] procedure to calculate the FDR. Significance was set as FDR<0.05. In addition, a 10-fold cross-validation was performed to validate the significant OTUs that were identified. The square root transformation was then applied to the relative abundances to correct for the skewness and to reduce the coefficient of variation. Comparisons of overall microbial composition between APC^Min/+mice versus the wild type mice were subsequently conducted using the permutation Hotelling T2 test with 10,000 permutations using the R package ‘Hotelling’ [38]. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted at the lowest taxonomic level (genus) using the wcmdscale function implemented by the vegan R package [39] and using Morisita-Horn dissimilarity scores.

Histological Analysis of the Intestinal Sections

Histological analysis was carried out in a subset of 10 APC^Min/+ mice and 10 wild type mice (1^st cohort) by constructing “Swiss rolls” of intestinal segments. These segments were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and scored for adenomas and inflammation by a pathologist who was blinded with respect to the genotype of the mice (N.O.), as previously described [40]. Inspection of intestinal segments stained with 0.25%methylene blue was carried out on the second and third cohorts of mice with the aid of a Zeiss dissecting scope for detection of adenomas and aberrant crypt foci [20].

Comparison of Mouse Proximal Colonic mRNA Expression in APCMin/+ and Wild type Mice

IL-1β mRNA expression relative to actin mRNA, was measured in cecal, proximal colonic, and distal colonic intestinal tissue RNA samples in all 30 APC^Min/+ and 30 WT mice as previously described [8]. RNA extracted from the proximal colon of 9 week-old WT mice treated with 3% DSS in water for 7 days was used as a positive control for the assay. The IL-1β ΔCt values (ΔCt = Ct_actin-Ct_IL1β) were compared between APC^Min/+ and WT groups using the Mann-Whitney test. Significance was set at a threshold of p <0.05.

Aliquots (1 μg) of proximal colon RNA samples from 6 APC were subjected to paired-ends 100 bp Illumina sequencing. The RNA-Seq libraries were prepared and sequenced at the New York Genome Center. Between 81 and 314 million reads were generated for each of the RNA samples. The RNA-Seq data were deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus database with accession number GSE67634. The short reads were aligned to the GRCm38 genome (http://useast.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/Info/Annotation) using STAR (Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference) [41], and then converted to raw gene counts using featureCounts [42]. The edgeR package [43] was used to identify differentially expressed (FDR<0.05) genes (DEGs) between the APC^Min/+ and wild type mice, using additional cutoff of 2-fold differential expression between groups. Hierarchical clustering based on the reads per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (RPKM) value of the 130 DEGs was carried out by using 1-r dissimilarity measurement and Ward linkage, and the cluster number (n = 7) was chosen based on inspection of the coefficient of determination (R2) plot as previously described [44]. Second, a negative binomial (NB) regression model was fit with gene clusters as following: x_ijh is gene cluster h’s expressions centroids (medians) of mouse j in shipment i. μ_ijk is the mean parameter for phylum k’s count distribution of mouse j in shipment i and ϕ_k is the dispersion parameter. “Shipment” is as defined above. b₀ and β₁ are fixed coefficients representing grand mean and APC genotype respectively. The log total count of each mice is considered as an offset. Best subset model selection was conducted to choose the model with lowest AIC. All models were fitted with R package: glmmADMB [45].

Results

The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp is increased in APC^Min/+mice colonic mucosa and luminal content prior to the development of intestinal neoplasias.

In preliminary targeted qPCR studies, we observed that the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. in fecal DNA was higher in 12–14 week-old APC^Min/+ female mice compared to age-matched WT female mice (ΔCt = -2.4 vs. ΔCt = -5.1, p = 0.0004). To test the hypothesis that the increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. preceded polyposis, we compared the relative abundance of this clade in the ileal, cecal, proximal colonic, distal colonic mucosa and the distal colonic luminal content in 6 week-old mice. Because gender effects have been previously reported on the number and location of polyps, we restricted our analysis to female mice [46]. Previous studies conducted on 6 week APC^Min/+ female mice had established the absence of detectable neoplasias at that age [18]. The absence of intestinal adenomas and aberrant crypt foci was confirmed in the mice included in this study by microscopic inspection of the intestinal segments. The mean histological scores for inflammation were 0.1 and 0 (p = 0.37) for APC^Min/+ and WT colons, respectively (n = 10 in each category). We observed a significant increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. in proximal colonic, distal colonic and distal luminal contents between the APC^Min/+ and WT-control mice, but no significant difference in the ileal or cecal mucosal samples (Table 1). In contrast we observed no significant difference is Lachnospiriceae spp., a prominent group of Firmicutes, except in the luminal content of the distal colon, which exhibited significantly higher loads in WT mice (p = 0.003).

Download:

Table 1. QPCR comparison of the relative abundances of the Bacteroidetes phylum and the Lachnospiriceae clade within the Firmicutes phylum in 6 week old APC^Min/+ and WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.t001

16S rRNA sequence analysis of proximal colonic mucosal samples from APC^Min/+ and WT mice

Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1V2 hypervariable region was carried out for the proximal colonic DNA samples. A total of 13,248,412 high-quality sequences were generated (average sequence length: 317 nt; average sample size: 220,807 sequences/sample; minimum: 9,381 sequences; maximum: 411,636 sequences, exclusive of negative controls which were near zero). The median Good’s coverage score was ≥ 99.9987% at the rarefaction point of 9,381 sequences, indicating deep sequence coverage of the intestinal microbiome.

The 16S rRNA sequencing results confirmed the targeted qPCR results in demonstrating a significant increase in the relative abundance of taxa within the Bacteroidetes phylum (FDR = 0.0009) in the APC^Min/+ mice (Fig 1A and Table 2). Within the Bacteroidetes phylum, the predominant family was S24-7, whose relative abundance was also significantly increased in APC^Min/+ mice (Fig 1A and Table 3, FDR = 0.0015). 16S rRNA sequencing detected a significant reduction in the relative abundance of taxa within the Tenericutes phylum (FDR< 0.0001), as well as a significant reduction in the relative abundance of the Anaeroplasmataceae family (FDR < 0.0001), which was the most prevalent family in the Tenericutes phylum. The results were also confirmed in all 10 cross-validations. The relative abundance of the Cyanobacteria phylum and the Chloroplast family, which is the most prevalent family in this phylum), was decreased in APC^Min/+ mice (FDR = 0.047). However this observation was confirmed in only 4 out of 10 cross-validations.

Download:

Fig 1. Comparison of phyla and families between wildtype (WT) and APC^Min/+ (APC) mice.

A. The mean relative abundances of phyla (left panel) and families (right panel) as inferred from the 16S rRNA sequence analysis. Only phyla and families with relative abundances >0.5% are shown. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the overall microbial composition, with p-values noted above each barchart.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.g001

Download:

Table 2. 16S rRNA Sequence comparison of the relative abundances of phyla in the proximal colonic mucosa of 6 week old APC^Min/+ and WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.t002

Download:

Table 3. 16S rRNA Sequence comparison of the relative abundances of families in the proximal colonic mucosa of 6 week old APCMin/+ and WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.t003

Although 16S rRNA sequence analysis did not detect a significant difference in the overall relative abundance of the Firmicutes phylum, it also confirmed the lack of any change in the relative abundance of taxa within Lachnospiriciae clade, thus confirming the qPCR data (see Table 1). Furthermore decreases as well as increased were observed in some of the individual families within the Firmicutes phylum (Table 3). Similarly, although 16S rRNA sequence analysis did not detect a significant difference in the overall relative abundance of the Proteobacteria phylum, increases as well as decreases were observed in some of the individual families within the Proteobacteria phylum.

Overall, the proximal colonic microbiomes differed between APC^Min/+ and WT mice at both the phylum (p<0.0001) and family (p <0.0001) levels, as assessed by a 10000-permutation Hotelling T2 test of the 7 phyla and 42 families that passed the initial filtering step (Fig 1A). The proximal colonic microbiomes of APC^Min/+ mice were also characterized by significantly lower OTU complexity (Shannon H; p = 0.009) and evenness (Shannon H/Hmax; p = 0.006) compared with WT mice (Fig 1B); OTU richness (S_Chao1) was comparable in the two groups. Finally, principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) demonstrated significant associations of principle component axes 1 and 2 with APC genotype (see Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Principle Coordinate Analysis.

PCoA was conducted at the family taxonomic level using a pairwise dissimilarity matrix calculated using the Morisita-Horn beta-diversity index. Each triangle is representative of a single APC^Min/+ (APC) mouse and each square is representative of a single WT mouse, plotted along the first two principal component axes (left panel). PC1 and PC2 accounted for 61% and 5.6%, respectively, of total variance. The middle and right panels display the PC scores along axes 1 and 2, respectively. Differences in scores between genotypes were assessed by student t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.g002

Differentially expressed genes in 6 week-old APC^Min/+mice

We reasoned that differences in colonic microbial composition associated with the APC^Min/+ genotype must be linked to alterations in mouse colon gene expression, despite the lack of histological evidence of neoplasias. To examine how the APC mutation could alter the host colon gene expression, we conducted parallel RNA-sequence analysis on 6 APC^Min/+ mice and 6 WT mice, (sampling all three cohorts). A total of 130 host genes (fold change > 2 fold, FDR <0.05) were selected using edgeR [43]. The DEGs were grouped into seven clusters as described in Methods (see Table 4), with 106 upregulated genes distributed among three clusters and the 24 downregulated genes distributed among four clusters.

Download:

Table 4. Hierarchical clustering of DEGs in APC^Min/+ proximal colonic RNA transcripts vs. control RNA samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.t004

NB regression (see Methods) selected four (1, 4, 6, 7) out of seven gene clusters (see Table 5) significantly (p-value < 0.05) in addition to APC genotype, which were positively associated with the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes. Among those four clusters, cluster 1 (coefficient 0.051) is composed of 100 out of 106 upregulated genes. The downregulated gene clusters 4,6,7 covers 22 out of 24 downregulated genes. While APC genotype had a dominant effect on the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, detection of additional associations with mouse colonic gene expression, suggest that alterations in host colonic gene expression play a role in influencing mucosal associated microbial composition.

Download:

Table 5. Association between gene cluster expression (centroid medians), APC genotype and the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes in the proximal colonic mucosa of 6 week old APC^Min/+ and WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127985.t005

Because elevated IL-1β levels have previously been reported in 18–25 week old APC^Min/+ compared with WT mice, RT-PCR assays were conducted on proximal colonic RNA samples in all of the mice as previously described [15]. No significant difference was observed in the ΔCt_IL1β-actin values between APC^Min/+ and WT mice (-13.5 vs. -16.2, p = 0.485). These values were both very low compared to that measured in DSS treated mice (-4.9), indicating that IL-1β was not highly expressed in the colons of either mouse group in our study.

Discussion

Alterations in the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) have been reported in human colonic neoplasia and in mouse models [1–6, 47]. This study demonstrates that alterations in the gut microbiome, characterized by an increased relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. observed in association with intestinal neoplasias, actually precedes the development of microscopically detectable intestinal neoplasias in 6 week old APC^Min/+ mice. Increased loads of Bacteroidetes spp. have been reported in another colitis-associated mouse model of colon cancer [47], and in some but not all studies of human colorectal neoplasia [1–6]. 16S rRNA sequence analysis revealed that the increased relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. corresponded primarily to an increased relative abundance of taxa within the uncultured family S24-7. Similar increases in S24-7 have also been reported in conventionally raised C57BL6 mice that were fed a high fat diet [48]. This association with intestinal dysbiosis is of interest, because increased dietary fat has previously been associated with increased number and /or size in both WT and APC^Min/+ mice [49,50].

The relative abundance of the phylum Tenericutes observed in this study is higher than reported by some studies of C57Bl/6 mice [51], but similar to another study using C57Bl/6 mice purchased from the same vendor [52]. In this study, the APC^Min/+ and WT mice were housed in separate cages, which could influence the reported microbial compositions [53, 54], possibly related to coprophagic behavior.

Alterations in gene expression have been previously reported in normal appearing mucosa of APC mutant mice after the development of intestinal polyposis [55]. We report differential expression of genes (DEG) in 6 week APC^Min/+ mice prior to the detection of intestinal polyposis. In order to integrate host colonic gene expression with the microbial taxonomic data, we reduced the gene expression input variables by first selecting DEGs, reasoning that these genes would be most likely to be involved in disrupted colonic microbial interactions in the mutant mice. Variable dimensionality was further reduced by clustering the 130 DEGs into seven groups. The detection of significant associations between host colonic gene expression and the relative abundance of microbial taxa, after taking into consideration APC genotype, support the concept that host colonic microbial cross talk influences mucosal associated microbial composition. Cluster 4, which included downregulated genes encoding immunoglobulins and non-coding functional RNAs, demonstrated a significant linear relationship with the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes after controlling for APC genotype. The inverse correlation between immunoglobulin gene expression and the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. is intriguing in light of previous reports linking an increased relative abundance of Bacteroidetes spp. with a reduction of immunoglobulin coated bacteria in humans [56, 57]. The observation that some of the non-coding RNAs in this cluster may be located in the mitochondria, is intriguing in light of the observation that mutated APC proteins in contrast to WT APC proteins are detected in mitochondria [58]

In summary, our results support the concept that APC haplo-insufficiency of the host colonic epithelial cell alters colonic microbial interactions prior to polyposis. It is thus conceivable that such microbiome changes contribute to the pathogenesis of colon cancer. An important corollary to such a notion would be that the colonic microbiome represents an important (and druggable) target for the prevention of colon cancer. Indeed, interventions directed at the microbiome (germ free and antibiotic treatment) have been reported to modulate tumor formation in mouse models of colon cancer [17]. However, it remains to be determined whether interventions directed at ameliorating dysbiosis in APC^Min/+ mice, such as through probiotic, prebiotic or antibiotic interventions, could reduce tumor formation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aaron Rosenfeld for assistance with conducting the RT-PCR assays for mouse IL-1β. We thank the New York Genome Center for providing RNA-Sequence Analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EL. Performed the experiments: JS SK DP NO DF DI. Analyzed the data: YZ XT WZ JS DF CR SK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EL GM YZ XT WZ CR DF. Wrote the paper: EL JS DF DP BR GM WZ YZ XT CR DI SK NO.

References

1. Shen XJ, Rawls JF, Randall T, Burcal L, Mpande CN, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of mucosal adherent bacteria and associations with colorectal adenomas. Gut Microbes 1: 138–147. pmid:20740058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Sobhani I, Tap J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roperch JP, Letulle S, et al. (2011) Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PLoS One 6: e16393. pmid:21297998
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C (2012) Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One 7: e39743. pmid:22761885
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Wang T, Cai G, Qiu Y, Fei N, Zhang M, et al. (2012) Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers. ISME J. 6:320–329 pmid:21850056
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Pedamallu CS, Michaud M, Duke F, et al. (2012) Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22:292–298 pmid:22009990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Ahn J, Sinha R, Pei Z, Dominianni C, Wu J, et al. (2013) Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105:1907–11 pmid:24316595
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, et al. (1991) Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 66: 589–600. pmid:1651174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, et al. (1991) Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 253: 661–665. pmid:1651562
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Ando H, et al. (1991) Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 253: 665–669. pmid:1651563
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Powell SM, Zilz N, Beazer-Barclay Y, Bryan TM, Hamilton SR, et al. (1992) APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis. Nature 359: 235–237. pmid:1528264
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1996) Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 87: 159–170. pmid:8861899
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Senda T, Iizuka-Kogo A, Onouchi T, Shimomura A (2007) Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) plays multiple roles in the intestinal and colorectal epithelia. Med Mol Morphol 40: 68–81. pmid:17572842
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Fearon ER (2011) Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 6: 479–507. pmid:21090969
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Su LK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Preisinger AC, Moser AR, et al. (1992) Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science 256: 668–670. pmid:1350108
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Dove WF, Clipson L, Gould KA, Luongo C, Marshall DJ, et al. (1997) Intestinal neoplasia in the ApcMin mouse: independence from the microbial and natural killer (beige locus) status. Cancer Res 57: 812–814. pmid:9041176
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Li Y, Kundu P, Seow SW, de Matos CT, Aronsson L, et al. (2012) Gut microbiota accelerate tumor growth via c-jun and STAT3 phosphorylation in APC^Min/+ mice. Carcinogenesis 33: 1231–1238. pmid:22461519
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Belcheva A, Irrazabal T, Robertson SJ, Streutker C, Maughan H, et al. (2014) Gut microbial metabolism drives transformation of msh2-deficient colon epithelial cells. Cell 158: 288–299. pmid:25036629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Mackenzie GG, Sun Y, Huang L, Xie G, Ouyang N, et al. (2010) Phospho-sulindac (OXT-328), a novel sulindac derivative, is safe and effective in colon cancer prevention in mice. Gastroenterology. 139:1320–32. pmid:20600034
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Sweetser DA, Hauft SM, Hoppe PC, Birkenmeier EH, Gordon JI (1988) Transgenic mice containing intestinal fatty acid-binding protein-human growth hormone fusion genes exhibit correct regional and cell-specific expression of the reporter gene in their small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 9611–9615. pmid:3200846
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Paulsen JE1, Namork E, Steffensen IL, Eide TJ, Alexander J. (2000) Identification and quantification of aberrant crypt foci in the colon of Min mice—a murine model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:534–9. pmid:10868458
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. (2004) Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primer for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:1166–1177. pmid:15546407
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokequchi S, et al. (2003) Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 39:81–86. pmid:14557000
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, et al. (2007) Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:13780–5. pmid:17699621
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Li E, Hamm CM, Gulati AS, Sartor RB, Chen H, et al. (2012) Inflammatory bowel diseases phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 genotype are associated with shifts in human ileum associated microbial composition. PLoS One.7:e26284. pmid:22719818
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. .Hara N, Alkanani AK, Ir D, Robertson CE, Wagner BD, et al. (2012) Prevention of virus-induced type 1 diabetes with antibiotic therapy. J Immunol 189: 3805–3814. pmid:22988033
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, et al. (2013) Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 339: 1084–1088. pmid:23328391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8: 186–194. pmid:9521922
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175–185. pmid:9521921
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27: 2194–2200. pmid:21700674
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Schloss PD, Westcott SL (2011) Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 3219–3226. pmid:21421784
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. .Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2012) SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28: 1823–1829. pmid:22556368
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, et al. (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D590–596. pmid:23193283
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. (1994) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York.
34. Robertson CE, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Granger D, Browne K, et al. (2013) Explicet: graphical user interface software for metadata-driven management, analysis and visualization of microbiome data. Bioinformatics 29: 3100–01. pmid:24021386
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. (2014) Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol. 10: e1003531. pmid:24699258
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Paulson JN, Stine OC, Bravo HC, Pop M. (2013) Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat Methods 10: 1200–02 pmid:24076764
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. James M. Curran (2013). Hotelling: Hotelling's t-squared test and variants. R package version 1.0–2. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=hotelling
39. Oksanen, J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, et al. (2008) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.15–1. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/, http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org.
40. Ouyang N, Zhu C, Zhou D, Nie T, Go MF, et al. (2012) MC-12, an annexin A1-based peptide, is effective in the treatment of experimental colitis. PLoS One. 2:e41585
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, et al. (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 29:15–21 pmid:23104886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 30:923–30. pmid:24227677
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140 pmid:19910308
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Zhang T, DeSimone RA, Jiao X, Rohlf FJ, Zhu W, et al. (2012) Host genes related to paneth cells and xenobiotic metabolism are associated with shifts in human ileum-associated microbial composition. PLoS One. 7:e30044. pmid:22719822
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A and Nielsen A (2015-01-25). Generalized Linear Mixed Models using AD Model Builder. R package version 0.8.1.
46. McAlpine CA, Barak Y, Matise I, Cormier RT. (2006) Intestinal-specific PPARγ deficiency enhances tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice. Int. J. Cancer 119: 2339–46. pmid:16858678
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Zackular JP1, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, et al. (2013) The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. MBio. 4:e00692–13. pmid:24194538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Serino M, Luche E, Gres S, Baylac A, Berge M, et al. (2012) Metabolic adaptation to a high-fat diet is associated with a change in the gut microbiota. Gut 61: 543–53. pmid:22110050
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Wasan HS, Novelli M, Bee J, Bodmer WF. (1997) Dietary fat influences on polyp phenotype in multiple intestinal neoplasia mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94:3308–13. pmid:9096389
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Day SD, Enos RT, McClellan JL, Steiner JL, Velázquez KT, et al. (2013) Linking inflammation to tumorigenesis in a mouse model of high-fat-diet-enhanced colon cancer. Cytokine. 64:454–62. pmid:23735174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Gu S, Chen D, Zhang JN, Lv X, Wang K, et al. (2013) Bacterial community mapping of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One 8: e74957. pmid:24116019
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Nagalingam NA1, Kao JY, Young VB. (2011) Microbial ecology of the murine gut associated with the development of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 17:917–26. pmid:21391286
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Campbell JH1, Foster CM, Vishnivetskaya T, Campbell AG, Yang ZK, et al. (2012) Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota. ISME J. 6:2033–44. pmid:22695862
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Robertson SJ, Zhou JY, Geddes K, Rubino SJ, Cho JH, et al. Nod1 and Nod2 signaling does not alter the composition of intestinal bacterial communities at homeostasis. Gut Microbes. 2013;4: 222–31 pmid:23549220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Chen LC1, Hao CY, Chiu YS, Wong P, Melnick JS, et al. (2004) Alteration of gene expression in normal-appearing colon mucosa of APC(min) mice and human cancer patients. Cancer Res. 64:3694–700. pmid:15150130
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. De Palma G1, Nadal I, Medina M, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, et al. (2010) Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 10:63. pmid:20181275
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Nadal I, Santacruz A, Marcos A, Warnberg J, Garagorri JM, et al. (2009) Shifts in clostridia, bacteroides and immunoglobulin-coating fecal bacteria associated with weight loss in obese adolescents. 33:758–67
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Brocardo M1, Lei Y, Tighe A, Taylor SS, Mok MT, et al. (2008) Mitochondrial targeting of adenomatous polyposis coli protein is stimulated by truncating cancer mutations: regulation of Bcl-2 and implications for cell survival. J. Biol Chem. 283: 5950–9. pmid:18160396
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Shen XJ, Rawls JF, Randall T, Burcal L, Mpande CN, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of mucosal adherent bacteria and associations with colorectal adenomas. Gut Microbes 1: 138–147. pmid:20740058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Sobhani I, Tap J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roperch JP, Letulle S, et al. (2011) Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PLoS One 6: e16393. pmid:21297998
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C (2012) Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One 7: e39743. pmid:22761885
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Wang T, Cai G, Qiu Y, Fei N, Zhang M, et al. (2012) Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers. ISME J. 6:320–329 pmid:21850056
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Pedamallu CS, Michaud M, Duke F, et al. (2012) Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22:292–298 pmid:22009990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Ahn J, Sinha R, Pei Z, Dominianni C, Wu J, et al. (2013) Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105:1907–11 pmid:24316595
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, et al. (1991) Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 66: 589–600. pmid:1651174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, et al. (1991) Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 253: 661–665. pmid:1651562
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Ando H, et al. (1991) Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science 253: 665–669. pmid:1651563
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Powell SM, Zilz N, Beazer-Barclay Y, Bryan TM, Hamilton SR, et al. (1992) APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis. Nature 359: 235–237. pmid:1528264
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1996) Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 87: 159–170. pmid:8861899
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Senda T, Iizuka-Kogo A, Onouchi T, Shimomura A (2007) Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) plays multiple roles in the intestinal and colorectal epithelia. Med Mol Morphol 40: 68–81. pmid:17572842
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Fearon ER (2011) Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 6: 479–507. pmid:21090969
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Su LK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Preisinger AC, Moser AR, et al. (1992) Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science 256: 668–670. pmid:1350108
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Dove WF, Clipson L, Gould KA, Luongo C, Marshall DJ, et al. (1997) Intestinal neoplasia in the ApcMin mouse: independence from the microbial and natural killer (beige locus) status. Cancer Res 57: 812–814. pmid:9041176
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Li Y, Kundu P, Seow SW, de Matos CT, Aronsson L, et al. (2012) Gut microbiota accelerate tumor growth via c-jun and STAT3 phosphorylation in APC^Min/+ mice. Carcinogenesis 33: 1231–1238. pmid:22461519
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Belcheva A, Irrazabal T, Robertson SJ, Streutker C, Maughan H, et al. (2014) Gut microbial metabolism drives transformation of msh2-deficient colon epithelial cells. Cell 158: 288–299. pmid:25036629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Mackenzie GG, Sun Y, Huang L, Xie G, Ouyang N, et al. (2010) Phospho-sulindac (OXT-328), a novel sulindac derivative, is safe and effective in colon cancer prevention in mice. Gastroenterology. 139:1320–32. pmid:20600034
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Sweetser DA, Hauft SM, Hoppe PC, Birkenmeier EH, Gordon JI (1988) Transgenic mice containing intestinal fatty acid-binding protein-human growth hormone fusion genes exhibit correct regional and cell-specific expression of the reporter gene in their small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 9611–9615. pmid:3200846
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Paulsen JE1, Namork E, Steffensen IL, Eide TJ, Alexander J. (2000) Identification and quantification of aberrant crypt foci in the colon of Min mice—a murine model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:534–9. pmid:10868458
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. (2004) Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primer for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:1166–1177. pmid:15546407
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokequchi S, et al. (2003) Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR Green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 39:81–86. pmid:14557000
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, et al. (2007) Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:13780–5. pmid:17699621
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Li E, Hamm CM, Gulati AS, Sartor RB, Chen H, et al. (2012) Inflammatory bowel diseases phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 genotype are associated with shifts in human ileum associated microbial composition. PLoS One.7:e26284. pmid:22719818
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. .Hara N, Alkanani AK, Ir D, Robertson CE, Wagner BD, et al. (2012) Prevention of virus-induced type 1 diabetes with antibiotic therapy. J Immunol 189: 3805–3814. pmid:22988033
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, et al. (2013) Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 339: 1084–1088. pmid:23328391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8: 186–194. pmid:9521922
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175–185. pmid:9521921
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27: 2194–2200. pmid:21700674
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Schloss PD, Westcott SL (2011) Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 3219–3226. pmid:21421784
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. .Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2012) SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28: 1823–1829. pmid:22556368
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, et al. (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D590–596. pmid:23193283
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. (1994) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York.

[ref34] 34. Robertson CE, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Granger D, Browne K, et al. (2013) Explicet: graphical user interface software for metadata-driven management, analysis and visualization of microbiome data. Bioinformatics 29: 3100–01. pmid:24021386
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. (2014) Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol. 10: e1003531. pmid:24699258
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Paulson JN, Stine OC, Bravo HC, Pop M. (2013) Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat Methods 10: 1200–02 pmid:24076764
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. James M. Curran (2013). Hotelling: Hotelling's t-squared test and variants. R package version 1.0–2. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=hotelling

[ref39] 39. Oksanen, J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, et al. (2008) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.15–1. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/, http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org.

[ref40] 40. Ouyang N, Zhu C, Zhou D, Nie T, Go MF, et al. (2012) MC-12, an annexin A1-based peptide, is effective in the treatment of experimental colitis. PLoS One. 2:e41585
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, et al. (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 29:15–21 pmid:23104886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 30:923–30. pmid:24227677
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140 pmid:19910308
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Zhang T, DeSimone RA, Jiao X, Rohlf FJ, Zhu W, et al. (2012) Host genes related to paneth cells and xenobiotic metabolism are associated with shifts in human ileum-associated microbial composition. PLoS One. 7:e30044. pmid:22719822
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A and Nielsen A (2015-01-25). Generalized Linear Mixed Models using AD Model Builder. R package version 0.8.1.

[ref46] 46. McAlpine CA, Barak Y, Matise I, Cormier RT. (2006) Intestinal-specific PPARγ deficiency enhances tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice. Int. J. Cancer 119: 2339–46. pmid:16858678
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Zackular JP1, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, et al. (2013) The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. MBio. 4:e00692–13. pmid:24194538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Serino M, Luche E, Gres S, Baylac A, Berge M, et al. (2012) Metabolic adaptation to a high-fat diet is associated with a change in the gut microbiota. Gut 61: 543–53. pmid:22110050
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Wasan HS, Novelli M, Bee J, Bodmer WF. (1997) Dietary fat influences on polyp phenotype in multiple intestinal neoplasia mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94:3308–13. pmid:9096389
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Day SD, Enos RT, McClellan JL, Steiner JL, Velázquez KT, et al. (2013) Linking inflammation to tumorigenesis in a mouse model of high-fat-diet-enhanced colon cancer. Cytokine. 64:454–62. pmid:23735174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Gu S, Chen D, Zhang JN, Lv X, Wang K, et al. (2013) Bacterial community mapping of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One 8: e74957. pmid:24116019
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Nagalingam NA1, Kao JY, Young VB. (2011) Microbial ecology of the murine gut associated with the development of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 17:917–26. pmid:21391286
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Campbell JH1, Foster CM, Vishnivetskaya T, Campbell AG, Yang ZK, et al. (2012) Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota. ISME J. 6:2033–44. pmid:22695862
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Robertson SJ, Zhou JY, Geddes K, Rubino SJ, Cho JH, et al. Nod1 and Nod2 signaling does not alter the composition of intestinal bacterial communities at homeostasis. Gut Microbes. 2013;4: 222–31 pmid:23549220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Chen LC1, Hao CY, Chiu YS, Wong P, Melnick JS, et al. (2004) Alteration of gene expression in normal-appearing colon mucosa of APC(min) mice and human cancer patients. Cancer Res. 64:3694–700. pmid:15150130
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] PubMed/NCBI

[206] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. De Palma G1, Nadal I, Medina M, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, et al. (2010) Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 10:63. pmid:20181275
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] PubMed/NCBI

[210] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Nadal I, Santacruz A, Marcos A, Warnberg J, Garagorri JM, et al. (2009) Shifts in clostridia, bacteroides and immunoglobulin-coating fecal bacteria associated with weight loss in obese adolescents. 33:758–67
View Article
Google Scholar

[212] View Article

[213] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Brocardo M1, Lei Y, Tighe A, Taylor SS, Mok MT, et al. (2008) Mitochondrial targeting of adenomatous polyposis coli protein is stimulated by truncating cancer mutations: regulation of Bcl-2 and implications for cell survival. J. Biol Chem. 283: 5950–9. pmid:18160396
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[215] View Article

[216] PubMed/NCBI

[217] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Animal Type and Housing

Tissue and Luminal Content Sample Collection

DNA and RNA Extraction of Intestinal Tissue and Luminal Content Samples

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for targeted bacterial clades

16S rRNA Amplicon Library Construction and Illumina V1V2 Sequencing Analysis

Histological Analysis of the Intestinal Sections

Comparison of Mouse Proximal Colonic mRNA Expression in APCMin/+ and Wild type Mice

Results

16S rRNA sequence analysis of proximal colonic mucosal samples from APCMin/+ and WT mice

Differentially expressed genes in 6 week-old APCMin/+mice

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

16S rRNA sequence analysis of proximal colonic mucosal samples from APC^Min/+ and WT mice

Differentially expressed genes in 6 week-old APC^Min/+mice