A Virulence Essential CRN Effector of Phytophthora capsici Suppresses Host Defense and Induces Cell Death in Plant Nucleus

Joseph Juma Mafurah; Huifei Ma; Meixiang Zhang; Jing Xu; Feng He; Tingyue Ye; Danyu Shen; Yanyu Chen; Nasir Ahmed Rajput; Daolong Dou

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127965

Abstract

Phytophthora capsici is a soil-borne plant pathogen with a wide range of hosts. The pathogen secretes a large array of effectors during infection of host plants, including Crinkler (CRN) effectors. However, it remains largely unknown on the roles of these effectors in virulence especially in P. capsici. In this study, we identified a cell death-inducing CRN effector PcCRN4 using agroinfiltration approach. Transient expression of PcCRN4 gene induced cell death in N. benthamiana, N. tabacum and Solanum lycopersicum. Overexpression of the gene in N. benthamiana enhanced susceptibility to P. capsici. Subcellular localization results showed that PcCRN4 localized to the plant nucleus, and the localization was required for both of its cell death-inducing activity and virulent function. Silencing PcCRN4 gene in P. capsici significantly reduced pathogen virulence. The expression of the pathogenesis-related gene PR1b in N. benthamiana was significantly induced when plants were inoculated with PcCRN4-silenced P. capsici transformant compared to the wilt-type. Callose deposits were also abundant at sites inoculated with PcCRN4-silenced transformant, indicating that silencing of PcCRN4 in P. capsici reduced the ability of the pathogen to suppress plant defenses. Transcriptions of cell death-related genes were affected when PcCRN4-silenced line were inoculated on Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting that PcCRN4 may induce cell death by manipulating cell death-related genes. Overall, our results demonstrate that PcCRN4 is a virulence essential effector and it needs target to the plant nucleus to suppress plant immune responses.

Citation: Mafurah JJ, Ma H, Zhang M, Xu J, He F, Ye T, et al. (2015) A Virulence Essential CRN Effector of Phytophthora capsici Suppresses Host Defense and Induces Cell Death in Plant Nucleus. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0127965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965

Academic Editor: Eliseo A. Eugenin, Rutgers University, UNITED STATES

Received: January 18, 2015; Accepted: April 21, 2015; Published: May 26, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Mafurah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, (31371894), http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/; and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, (BK2012027), www.jstd.gov.cn/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

During plant-pathogen interactions, pathogens secrete an array of effector proteins to aid infection and establishment of parasitic lifestyles by modulating host cell defenses [1–3]. At the same time plants defend themselves through several mechanisms of local immune system of each cell and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) of the whole plant [1,2]. The plant immune system and its interplay with pathogen effectors are widely illustrated as a four-stage zigzag model. When plants are attacked by microbes, they recognize microbe or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) which elicits PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). Effective microbes have evolved a huge and diverse effector repertoires to counter PTI by suppression and subsequently enhance susceptibility (Effector-triggered susceptibility, ETS) [1,4]. A dynamic interaction between host immune responses and pathogen effectors has been widely reported in different pathosystems [5,6]; and identifying pathogen effectors and discovering their functions have become as essential routes to understand pathogen establishment.

Phytophthora pathogens encode a large number of effectors to interfere with host plant cell physiology and function. They belong to the fungus-like oomycetes, which are evolutionarily closely to algae in the kingdom Stramenopila [7,8]. Phytophthora species are arguably the most destructive pathogens of many dicotyledonous plants and contain many well-known pathogens including P. capsici [9,10]. P. capsici is a broad-host-range pathogen, and may cause damage to many economically important vegetables including all cucurbits, pepper, tomato and eggplant. The disease occurrence and acuteness have significantly increased in recent decades worldwide [10]. However, its pathogenesis mechanisms are still largely unknown. Similar to other well-studied Phytophthora pathogens, such as P. infestans and P. sojae, P. capsici also encodes a large number of host cytoplasmic effectors, including 357 putative RXLR (Arg-any amino acid-Leu-Arg) and 84 CRN (Crinkler, Crinkling and necrosis inducing protein) effectors [11]. The RXLR effectors contain a conserved N-terminal motif that is involved in translocation inside host cells [12,13] and C-terminal domains that may manipulate plant immunity responses [5,14].

CRN effectors are another group of pathogen proteins presumed to enter the host cytoplasm [15,16]. Interestingly, CRN effectors are also modular proteins. Their N-termini contain the predicted signal peptide and a conserved motif, FLAK (F, Phe; L, Leu; A, Ala; and K, Lys), which is essential for effector translocation to host cells [17]. The C-terminal effector domains have various functions, such as inducing cell death (CD) and suppressing host immunity [15,18–20]. They usually target host cell nucleus to efficiently exert their biological functions [17,20]. Analyses of three necrosis-inducing CRN effector domains (DN17, D2, and DXZ) revealed differences in the timing and occurrence of cell death in N. benthamiana [21]. Several CRN effectors studied so far have shown that they enhance pathogen virulence. For example, CRN8 with a functional RD kinase enhanced virulence of P. infestans when it was expressed in planta. In contrast, its dominant-negative CRN8^R469A;D470A resulted in reduced virulence [22]. Liu et al. have demonstrated that silencing of PsCRN63 and PsCRN115 jointly in P. sojae led to a reduction of virulence on soybean [18]. In a recent study, N. benthamiana expressing PsCRN70 gene increased its vulnerability to P. parasitica [23]. However, the virulence mechanisms of P. capsici CRN effectors are mostly unknown.

In this report, a P. capsici CRN effector PcCRN4 was identified by cell death-inducing assay in planta. It can induce CD on the tested plants and the encoding gene was dramatically induced at the infectious stages. Silencing the genes in a stable transformant leads to a significant reduction of virulence on plants and its transient expression in planta enhances plant susceptibility. Furthermore, ROS accumulation, callose deposition and expressions of PR1b and CD-related genes were altered in plants inoculated with the PcCRN4-silenced transformant. Collectively, we propose a role for CRN effectors in P. capsici virulence.

Materials and Methods

Plasmid construction

The oligonucleotides used for the following plasmid constructs are documented in S1 Table. For PVX recombinant constructs, 47 genes encoding CRN effectors were amplified and inserted into the modified PVX vector [6] using the Sma I and Not I restriction sites. For GFP fusion constructs, PcCRN4, PcCRN4:NES and PcCRN4:nes were amplified using combinations of oligonucleotide primers PcCRN4-F and PcCRN4-R, PcCRN4-F and PcCRN4-NES-R, and PcCRN4-F and CRN4-nes-R, respectively. PCR products were digested with Sma I and Xba I restriction enzymes, and then inserted into the expression vector pBinGFP2 [24]. To make the construct for gene silencing in P. capsici, partial sequence of PcCRN4 was amplified using PrimeSTAR HS DNA Polymerase (Takara code DR010A) and subsequently inserted into pTOR [13,25]. All the generated plasmids were validated by sequencing by GenScript Corporation Company (Nanjing, China).

Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration assays

The A. tumefaciens infiltration assays were performed as previously described methods [26], except that an A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 [27] was used. For infiltration, each recombinant strain was cultured in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 50 μg ml^-1 kanamycin at 28°C to 30°C and 220 rpm for 48 h. The bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation (3,000g, 5 min), washed three times with 10 mM MgCl₂, and then resuspended in 10 mM MgCl₂ to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4. Infiltrations were performed on 6–8 week-old Nicotiana benthamiana, N. tabacum and Solanum lycopersicum plants. Plants were grown and maintained all through the experiments in a greenhouse with favorable temperature of 22–25°C and high light intensity under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod. For CD triggering assays, A. tumefaciens cells loaded with the respective constructs were infiltrated into the leaves by pressure infiltration by placing a small nick on each leaf with a needle, then 30–50 ml of cell suspension was infiltrated through the nick using a syringe without a needle. Symptoms were monitored from 4 to 8 days after infiltration, and photographs were taken after 5 days for N. benthamiana, 8 days for N. tabacum and 15 days for S. lycopersicum. These experiments were repeated at least three times.

Pathogenicity assay

Phytophthora capsici infection assays were performed by droplet inoculations of zoospore solutions of the P. capsici isolate LT263 (10 x 100 of zoospores μl^-1) on detached N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. At least ten independent N. benthamiana leaves (4 weeks old) and A. thaliana leaves (6–8 weeks old) were tested per construct combination. Agrobacteria cells containing GFP:PcCRN4, PcCRN4:NES, PcCRN4:nes or GFP (control) were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves, and 24 h later the leaves were detached and inoculated with P. capsici zoospores on the abaxial side. Diseased plant tissues (36 hpi) were stained by Trypan blue as described methods [28]. The diameters of the diseased lesions were measured at 24, 36 and 48 hpi, and photographed at 36 hpi. The assay was repeated at least three times. Dunnett’s test was used for statistical analysis.

Phytophthora capsici inoculation and in vitro samples

Phytophthora capsici wild-type strain LT263 was grown in petri dishes on V8 agar medium in a dark climate chamber at 25°C for 4 days and under standard light at 22°C for 3 days. To induce zoospore release, the cultures were washed twice with sterilized distilled water and released in 10 ml of sterile distilled water per plate by placing at 4°C for 0.5 h followed by incubation at 25°C for about 1 h. Release of zoospores was monitored; their numbers counted with a hemocytometer under a microscope, and adjusted to 100 zoospores μl^-1. The detached leaves were inoculated with 20 μl droplets of the zoospore solution and samples were collected after 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h and 48 h then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. In addition to samples to be taken during the infectious stages, zoospores (ZO), germinating cysts (GC), and mycelia (MY) grown in vitro were also prepared. ZO were collected in 50 ml centrifuge tube, shaken vigorously, then observed under the microscope. For GC, an equal volume of V8 broth was added to the zoospore suspension, mixed and allowed to stand for 1 h at 25°C. The mixture was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes and pellets collected. The mycelia were grown in 1 ml pea broth, infected with 20 μl of inoculum at 22°C, and harvested 48 hpi by collecting the mycelial mat into 10 ml tubes. The samples were placed in the controlled incubator with the same conditions as the leaf samples, and then harvested with 5 minutes centrifugation at 1,200 g. The pellets were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen after the supernatant was removed.

RNA extraction and real time quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from frozen leaf tissue (RNAsimple Total RNA kit, Tiangen) according to the manufacture’s protocols. Its quality was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, then the quantity was measured with a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop ND-1000). The total RNA was treated with DNase to remove genomic DNA contamination and cDNA was synthesized using 1000 ng of total RNA using a commercial kit (PrimeScript reagent Kit, TaKaRa) following the recommended instructions.

All the specific primers for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) were designed for each gene (S1 Table). The experiments of qRT-PCR were performed in 20 μl reactions, including 20 ng cDNA, 0.2 μM gene-specific primers, 0.4 ul ROX Reference Dye, 10 μl of SYBR Premix ExTaq (TaKaRa), and 6.8 μl of deionized water. An ABI Prism 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) was used under the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s and 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 34 s, followed by a dissociation step of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 s. The relative expression levels of the tested genes were normalized to the P. capsici Actin gene.

Protein extraction and Western blot

The experiments were performed as previously described methods [24]. Briefly, the N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with GFP:PcCRN4, GFP:PcCRN4:NES, GFP:PcCRN4:nes and GFP harvested at 2 dpi. Protein extractions were done using GTEN buffer (10% Glycerol, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) that is supplemented with 2% PVP, 10 mM DTT and 1X Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Samples were separated on 12% SDS PAGE gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked for 30 minutes with 5% milk in PBS-T (0.1% tween) and probed with GFP antibody (Genscript). The treated membranes were washed 3 times in PBS-T for 5 minutes and then incubated in PBS-T with a goat anti-mouse IRDye 800CW (Li-Cor) for 40 min. After three times wash with PBS-T, the membranes were visualized using a LI-COR Odyssey scanner with excitation 700 and 800 nm to obtain images.

Confocal microscopy

All localization studies were done on N. benthamiana leaves that were infiltrated with GFP-tagged PcCRN4, PcCRN4:NES and CRN4:nes two days earlier. The leaves were infiltrated with water to maintain cell structure after detachment and then mounted on a microscope slide. The controls were leaves infiltrated with GFP. Leaf samples were imaged using a Zeiss 710 CLSM with the excitation wavelength at 488 nm.

Stable silencing of PcCRN4 in P. capsici

A partial sense sequence of PcCRN4 was cloned into the pTOR vector and transformed into wild-type isolate LT263 as described previously [26]. The transformants were maintained on V8 agar plates supplemented with 50 μg ml^-1 of G418 and gene expression levels from the mycelium were determined by qRT-PCR as described previously.

Oxygen burst detection and callose deposition assay

Oxygen burst was observed based on H₂O₂ accumulation after staining N. benthamiana leaves with diaminobenzidine (DAB) [28]. Briefly, the leaves were infiltrated with PcCRN4 constructs adjusted to OD 0.2 then 24 hpi, they were inoculated with P. capsici zoospores (10 x 100 zoospores μl^-1). The leaves were then soaked in DAB at 1 mg ml^-1 12 hpi thereafter maintained at 25°C for 8 h. Leaf sections were cleared by boiling in 95% ethanol for 15 min and incubated in bleaching solution until all the chlorophyll was completely bleached. The experiments were repeated at least three times.

Callose deposition assays for Arabidopsis were modified as follows from previously described procedures [29]. Briefly, leaves of 8-week-old Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia-0 plants, were inoculated with 3-day-old P. capsici mycelium (5 mm). After 6 and 24 h, leaf disks from inoculated areas were excised with a cork borer from Arabidopsis (5 mm in diameter), and then incubated in bleaching solution of 1:1:1:1:8 (phenol: glycerol: lactic acid: water: ethanol) at 60°C until the leaf disks were cleared of chlorophyll. The cleared leaf disks were washed three times with distilled water, and then immersed in 0.01% aniline blue in 150 mM K₂HPO4 (pH 9.5) and incubated in the dark for 4 hours. The stained leaf disks were mounted with 60% glycerol on glass slides and observed from the adaxial surface of the disk by epifluorescence microscopy using ultraviolet light.

Results

Identification of PcCRN4 homologs and cell death inducing activities in three plants

To investigate the roles of CRN effectors from P. capsici, we screened CRN effectors that can trigger cell death (CD) using the potato virus X (PVX)-mediated transient expression in N. benthamiana and N. tabacum [30]. In total 47 PcCRN genes (S2 Table), three genes (PcCRN4, PcCRN23 and PcCRN42) exhibit CD-inducing activities in N. benthamiana and PcCRN4 induced CD in both plants while no CD activities were observed in all other genes (S1 Fig). The PcCRN4 gene has been reported as PcCRN83_152 and induced CD in N. benthamiana [20]. We named the genes depending on their relative expression levels in P. capsici hyphae, determined by RNA-seq analysis (S2 Table), implying that PcCRN4 was the 4^th highest in terms of relative expression among the 47 PcCRN effectors. We selected PcCRN4 gene for further analysis based on the following reasons. It exhibited strong CD in the tested plants at 4 dpi (days post infiltration) while the other two genes (PcCRN23 and PcCRN42) induced weak cell death in N. benthamiana only at 5 dpi (S1 Fig). On the phylogenetic tree, the 22 CRNs were categorized into three clades according to origin (Fig 1A). Clade 1 include 9 members from P. sojae and 2 from P. rumorum. All 7 P. infestans genes belong to Clade 2 while clade 3 contains 4 members from P. capsici, suggestive of a specie-specific expansion of this orthologous gene group. Its homologs PsCRN63 from P. sojae and PiCRN2 from P. infestans have been shown to elicit cell death in N. benthamiana [16,18].

Download:

Fig 1. Identification of PcCRN4 orthologs and cell death assay of PcCRN4.

(A) Phylogenetic relationships of PcCRN4 orthologs in four Phytophthora species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with amino acid sequences using MEGA 5 with the neighbor-joining method, 1,000 replicates, and pairwise-deletion option. CRN genes, designated Ps, Pi, Pr and Pc correspond to P. sojae, P. infestans, P. ramorum and P. capsici respectively. PcCRN4 induces cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana (B), N. tabacum (C) and Solanum lycopersicum (D). The leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying GFP:PcCRN4 and the indicated controls. The photographs were taken 5 days (B), 8 days (C) and 15 days post infiltration (D), respectively. All the experiments were repeated at least three times.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g001

Furthermore, we confirmed PcCRN4 CD-inducing activities using plant infiltration experiments by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression (GFP gene fusion with the mature PcCRN4 gene without the predicted signal peptides) in N. benthamiana, N. tabacum and S. lycopersicum. A known elicitor of cell death, the P. infestans INF1 [31] and GFP were used as a positive and negative controls respectively. Strong necrosis phenotype was observed in N. benthamiana at 5 dpi (Fig 1B), N. tabacum at 8 dpi (Fig 1C) and S. lycopersicum at 15 dpi (Fig 1D). The results were similar for each repeat and demonstrated that PcCRN4 can trigger cell death in a variety of the tested plants.

PcCRN4 is expressed at infection stages

Nextly, we determined its expression levels at different stages using quantitative RT-PCR on N. benthamiana leaves inoculated with motile zoospores of P. capsici. PcCRN4 transcripts were detectable in the mycelium (MY), zoospores (ZO) and germinating cysts (GC) at low levels; and increased during the early biotrophic phase (3 hours post-inoculation; hpi) and reached the peak at 12 hpi (Fig 2). The amount of PcCRN4 transcripts declined in late biotrophy (24 hpi) and became barely detectable during the necrotrophic phase of the infection (36 and 48 hpi). These results suggested that the PcCRN4 transcripts accumulate at the early stages of infection.

Download:

Fig 2. Expression profile of the PcCRN4 gene.

Relative PcCRN4 mRNA levels were quantified by quantitative RT-PCR in samples corresponding to mycelium (MY), swimming zoospores (ZO), germinating cysts (GC) and Nicotiana benthamiana leaves inoculated with P. capsici zoospores at different time-points post infection. P. capsici actin transcripts were used as a reference and then normalized to the MY.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g002

PcCRN4 requires nuclear localization to trigger cell death

Previous reports have shown that PiCRN8 [22] and PsCRN63 [18] target the plant nucleus to trigger cell death. To determine whether PcCRN4 also targets the nucleus, we searched the potential nuclear localization signal (NLS) using cNLS Mapper [32] and found that PcCRN4 contained a predicted NLS amino acid region at 363–388 (LAEPVKRRKLNQMLPFEPVKRRKLNQ). We hypothesized that the nuclear localization is required for CD induction and then tested this by fusing a nuclear exclusion signal (NES) [33] to the C terminus of PcCRN4. The fused protein was ectopically expressed by agroinfiltration. PcCRN4:NES consistently failed to elicit cell death 5 dpi (Fig 3A). To exclude the possibility that the NES may interfere with the activity, its mutated counterpart (nes) was fused to the C terminus of PcCRN4. In the nonfunctional nes, the second and third Leu residues and the first Ile residue were all substituted with Ala residues [33]. This construct robustly induced cell death as the wild-type (Fig 3A). NES constructs prevented nuclear accumulation of PcCRN4 inferred from the localization experiments, whereas PcCRN4 fused to the mutated NES domain retained in the nucleus (Fig 3B). We used Western blot analysis to confirm that these protein fusions were correctly expressed and the resultant proteins were largely stable in plant cells as only low levels of free GFP was observed (Fig 3C). Thus, we inferred that PcCRN4 requires nuclear accumulation to induce plant cell death.

Download:

Fig 3. PcCRN4 effector domains function in plant nucleus.

(A) Nuclear localization is required for PcCRN4-inducing cell death. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium strains carrying the indicated constructs. The representative pictures were taken at 5 dpi. The number shows the cell death sites and the total infiltrated leaves for each gene. NES and nes represent the nuclear export signal and nonfunctional NES. (B) NES impairs accumulation of GFP:PcCRN4 in N. benthamiana nucleus. N. benthamiana leaves were agroinfiltrated with the indicated constructs 48 hours before assessment of GFP confocal imaging. Scale bars, 25 μm. (C) Immunoblot analyses of GFP fusion protein accumulation in planta. Total proteins were extracted at 48 hpi. Blots were probed with α-GFP antibody. Sizes in kDa are indicated on the left.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g003

PcCRN4 enhances Phytophthora virulence on N. benthamiana and decreases ROS accumulation

Many oomycete effectors can suppress plant immunity responses [12,34–36]. Thus, we determined whether PcCRN4 interferes with plant immunity using plant transformation experiments by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression of PcCRN4, PcCRN4:NES and PcCRN4:nes in N. benthamiana, whereas GFP was used as a control. Following agroinfiltration with the constructs (24 h later), we inoculated the infiltrated regions with P. capsici zoospores (10 x 100 zoospores μl^-1) and evaluated disease development at the indicated times following inoculation (Fig 4A). On leaves infiltrated with strains carrying control gene (GFP), the diameter of the diseased lesion was approximately 1.2–1.5 cm at 36 hpi, which was similar to PcCRN4:NES at 1.3–1.7 cm; however, the lesion diameter expanded to 1.9–2.5 cm and 1.8–2.4 cm on leaves with strains carrying PcCRN4 and PcCRN4:nes, respectively (Fig 4B).

Download:

Fig 4. Expression of PcCRN4 in N. benthamiana increased susceptibility to Phytophthora and suppressed ROS accumulation.

(A) Observed phenotypes and (B) lesion diameters of N. benthamiana leaves inoculated with P. capsici. Ten μl (100 μl^-1) zoospores were inoculated in the infiltrated regions 24 hours post infiltrated with the indicated genes and the photograph was then taken at 36 hours post inoculation. The lesion diameters were scored at the indicated time points. Statistical analyses were performed using a Dunnett’s test. (**, P < 0.01). (C) DAB staining of the inoculated sites of N. benthamiana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g004

To explore mechanisms behind the increased Phytophthora susceptibility of PcCRN4, diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used to examine infected plant tissues for H₂O₂ production [28]. Less DAB staining was observed (12 hpi) in infected regions of PcCRN4 and PcCRN4:nes compared to the PcCRN4:NES and GFP control (Fig 4C), indicating that PcCRN4 needs to target the plant nucleus to suppress H₂O₂ accumulation. Taken together, we showed that PcCRN4 needs to target plant nucleus to suppress plant defenses and promote colonization of the pathogen.

PcCRN4 is required for full virulence

To directly test the contribution of PcCRN4 to P. capsici virulence, stable silencing of PcCRN4 gene in P. capsici was carried out by polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transformation method with the sense construct PcCRN4 gene [18,26]. One silenced transformant (T4) was identified from 10 putative transformants that could grow on selective medium containing 50 μg ml^-1 G418 and PCR screening. This transformant (T4) had the expression level of PcCRN4 reduced to <40% of the wild-type according to qPCR results (Fig 5A). The T4 transformant showed significantly reduced virulence on N. benthamiana at 36 hpi and A. thaliana at 24 hpi leaves as compared to the wild type (P<0.01) (Fig 5B–5D). To measure virulence of the transformant more precisely, we quantified the host and pathogen DNA by qPCR 12 h after inoculation [37,38]. The relative virulence was significantly reduced in T4 as compared to WT and another transformant in which PcCRN4 gene was not silenced (Fig 5E). To investigate the effect PcCRN4 on host resistance, transcript accumulation of pathogenesis-related gene PR1b was examined. When the N. benthamiana leaves were inoculated with T4, rapid and increased levels of the transcriptions were observed at early stages of infection more than the non-silenced lines (Fig 5F). These results together with the virulence data indicated that PcCRN4 plays an important virulent role during infection.

Download:

Fig 5. PcCRN4-silenced line showed reduced virulence.

(A) Generation of a transformant with the silenced PcCRN4 gene. Relative expression of PcCRN4 in the silenced line (T4), unsilenced line (CK) and the wild type (WT) is shown. P. capsici actin transcripts were used as a reference and then normalized to the wild-type. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments with SE. (B and C) Lesions induced by the silenced line T4 and WT on N. benthamiana (B) and A. thaliana (C) leaves. The typical photos were taken at 36 hpi (B) and 30 hpi (C). (D) Lesion diameters of the inoculated sites. The data was measured at 36 hpi (N. benthamiana) and 30 hpi (A. thaliana) from over three independent replicates (**, P < 0.01, Student t-test). (E) Relative DNA amount in P. capsici in N. benthamiana. The relative virulence was calculated by Q-PCR assays of pathogen DNA levels in infected leaves relative to host DNA at12 hpi. Error bars represent SD from three technical replicates. (**, P < 0.01, Student t-test). (F) Relative expression of PR1b in N. benthamiana leaves. P. capsici actin gene was used as a reference and then normalized to the uninfected leaves (0 h) (**, P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g005

To determine the effect of PcCRN4 on T4 growth in planta, we infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves with PcCRN4, and 24 h later inoculated the leaves with T4 and WT zoospores. The lesion diameter of T4 increased from 1.3 cm when inoculated with GFP to 2.7 cm with PcCRN4 at 36 hpi (Fig 6A and 6B). Collectively, the results suggested that in planta expression of PcCRN4 can complement the PcCRN4 silencing line based on the virulence tests.

Download:

Fig 6. In planta expression of PcCRN4 recovers virulence of the silenced line.

Observed phenotypes (A) and lesion diameters (B) of N. benthamiana leaves. Ten μl (100 μl^-1) zoospores of each line were inoculated in the infiltrated regions 24 hours post infiltrated with PcCRN4 or GFP and the photographs were then taken at 36 hours post inoculation. The average lesion diameters were calculated from over three independent replicates. (**, P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g006

To analyze pathogen development in the host, we used an inverted microscope to visualize hyphae in infected tissue. At 24 hpi the transformant T4 and WT on infected A. thaliana leaves were stained with trypan blue. Abundant P. capsici hyphae were observed in tissues of WT but few hyphae were present in the tissues of silenced line T4 (Fig 7A). This result suggested that PcCRN4 is required for full development of P. capsici.

Download:

Fig 7. Silenced line could not suppress host H₂O₂ accumulation and callose deposition.

(A) Trypan blue staining of the inoculated A. thaliana leaves. The typical photographs were taken after decolorizing with chloral hydrate 24 hpi. Bar, 40 μm. (B). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. The inoculated leaves were stained with DAB stain and photographs were taken at 12 hpi. (C) Callose deposition detected with aniline blue staining. Data under the photos shows the relative callose intensities at 6 and 24 hpi from four replicates. The average number of callose deposits per microscopic field of 1 mm² was calculated using the ImageJ software. Bars, 100 μm. T4, silenced line, WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g007

DAB staining was performed on A. thaliana leaves, strong staining was observed in the silenced line T4 as compared to the WT at 12 hpi (Fig 7B). This result indicated that PcCRN4 may promote Phytophthora infection by suppressing the H₂O₂ accumulation. Callose deposition was performed on the silenced line T4 and WT on A. thaliana leaves as described methods [29]. At 6 hpi, the callose deposits were almost undetectable and the same in T4 and WT. However, a strong signal of callose deposition was only found at 24 hpi in A. thaliana cells inoculated with WT (Fig 7C). This result indicated that a reduction in expression of the PcCRN4 in P. capsici resulted in loss of abilities to suppress PTI in host cells.

PcCRN4 may manipulate cell death by regulating expression of cell death-related genes

Since PcCRN4 must enter plant cell nucleus to induce cell death, it is likely to affect the transcriptional levels of plant genes involved in cell death. Therefore, we tested expression levels of four well-known cell death-related genes (AtMC1, AtLSD1, AtBI-1 and AtPAD4) in Arabidopsis after inoculation with wild-type and PcCRN4-silenced line. Transcripts of AtMC1 and AtLSD1 genes, which are positive regulators of cell death [39,40], were down-regulated in Arabidopsis leaves inoculated with PcCRN4-silenced line compared to that infected with wild-type (Fig 8). However, expression of another positive cell death regulator AtPAD4 [41] was not significantly affected (Fig 8). These results suggested that PcCRN4 triggers cell death via a pathway dependent on AtMC1/AtLSD1 but independent on AtPAD4. Interestingly, transcripts of the broad-spectrum cell-death suppressor AtBI-1 [41,42] were significantly higher in the PcCRN4-silenced line, compared to wild-type-infected plant tissues, suggesting that PcCRN4 promotes cell death partially by suppressing expression of the cell death inhibitor AtBI-1. Taken together, these results suggested that PcCRN4 promotes cell death by regulating expression of cell death-related genes.

Download:

Fig 8. Relative expression levels of cell death-related genes in Arabidopsis after infection with wild-type and PcCRN4-silenced line.

The relative levels of transcript were calculated by the comparative Ct method. Expression on leaves of A. thaliana inoculated with pathogen for 0 hr was fixed as one. Transcript levels of UBQ5 gene of Arabidopsis were used to normalize different samples. Bars represent means and standard deviations of three replications. Asterisks indicate statistical differences between the transcripts of WT and T4 (P<0.01, Dunnett’s test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.g008

Discussion

Oomycete CRN proteins were initially identified through their ability to induce crinkling and necrosis when expressed in plant tissue, consequently this protein family is generally considered as a class of CD-triggering effectors [16]. However, recent studies suggested that the majority of CRNs could suppress CD triggered by PAMPs or other elicitors [15,19,23]. A recent study revealed that some CRN domains in P. capsici induce necrosis when expressed in planta [20]. Our study showed that PcCRN4 induced cell death in N. benthamiana, N. tabacum and S. lycopersicum, suggesting that PcCRN4 may target conserved and critical host proteins or signaling pathways.

We previously identified P. sojae effectors PsCRN63 and PsCRN115 and determined their expression patterns. PsCRN63 was found to be induced during the late infection stages (12 and 24 hpi), whereas the highest levels of PsCRN115 RNA were found at the mycelium stage [18]. We analyzed the expression pattern of the PcCRN4 gene during infection. PcCRN4 transcripts were low in the mycelium, motile zoospores and geminating cysts before infection. The transcripts accumulated during infection stage and reached maximum at 12 hpi, and their abundance dropped rapidly in late infection stages. Earlier studies on gene expression during pre-infection stages indicated that the greatest changes in P. capsici occurred during cyst germination compared with mycelium and zoospores [43]. Nevertheless, another study found evidence of a distinct biotrophic phase followed by a transition to necrotrophy after 24 hpi and sporulation at 72 hpi on susceptible tomato by P. capsici [44]. The gene expression pattern of PcCRN4 suggests that it is involved in the initial manipulation of host cell death and defenses.

Emerging evidence has shown that oomycete and fungal pathogen effectors can enter inside plant cells to promote virulence [5,6]. Our results showed that PcCRN4 was required for the full virulence, and can induce cell death and enhance susceptibility when it was overexpressed in N. benthamiana. Its functions in plant cells are similar to its homologues effector PsCRN63 from P. sojae [18], but contrary to other effectors. For example, other cell-death-inducing CRN effectors could not enhance virulence [20]. Plant cell death is not only a major consequence of pathogen infection, but also prevent pathogen growth [39]. P. capsici, as a hemibiotrophic and wide-host-range pathogen, is assumed to evade host CD during the biotrophic phase but promote it during the necrotrophic phase. Since this gene is mostly expressed at the biotrophic phase, it is still unclear how CD-inducing activity of PcCRN4 contributes to its virulence. Considering that PcCRN4 may suppress plant ROS accumulation, PR1b gene expression and callose deposits, we speculate that this effector can suppress plant immunity when other effectors that can block PcCRN4-induced-CD are present. This is consistent with that two P. sojae RXLR effectors (Avh172 and Avh238) that can regulate host CD and play a positive role in infection [38].

Many Phytophthora CRN proteins are nuclear effectors [15,18,20]. We demonstrated that PcCRN4 need plant nuclear localization for its virulent and CD-inducing activities, although its biochemical mechanisms are unknown. The nucleus is the heart of plant cells and is also important for plant immunity. It has been shown that some bacterial effectors enter the host nucleus to interfere with transcription, chromatin-remodelling, RNA splicing or DNA replication and repair. These effectors are called ‘nucleomodulins’ or ‘nuclear attacks’ [45]. Thus, PcCRN4 belongs to a group of oomycete ‘nucleomodulins’ which might have permanent genetic or epigenetic effects on the hosts. Our results suggest that PcCRN4 promotes cell death by regulating transcription of cell death-related genes. However, it is still unknown whether PcCRN4 regulates expression of these cell death-related genes by direct binding to their promoter regions to promote/suppress transcription. Future identification of its host targets, including DNA and nuclear proteins, might lead to a better understanding or its functions in the nucleus.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Phenotypic analyses of CRN effector domains in planta.

Four CRN effectors induced cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana and two induced death in both N. benthamiana and N. tabacum. The rest of the CRN effectors could not induce cell death. The experiment was repeated three times each with four infection sites per construct. The photos were taken at 5 dpi for N. benthamiana and 8 dpi for N. tabacum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.s002

(DOC)

S2 Table. Summary of the screened CRN effectors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127965.s003

(DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DD. Performed the experiments: JJM HM MZ JX FH TY YC NAR. Analyzed the data: JJM MZ DS DD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FH DS NAR. Wrote the paper: JJM DD MZ. Bioinformatical analysis: DS.

References

1. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006;124: 803–814. pmid:16497589
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Hogenhout SA, Van der Hoorn RA, Terauchi R, Kamoun S. Emerging concepts in effector biology of plant-associated organisms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22: 115–122. pmid:19132864
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Fu ZQ, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64: 839–863. pmid:23373699
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444: 323–329. pmid:17108957
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Dou D, Zhou JM. Phytopathogen effectors subverting host immunity: different foes, similar battleground. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12: 484–495. pmid:23084917
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Kazan K, Lyons R. Intervention of phytohormone pathways by pathogen effectors. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 2285–2309. pmid:24920334
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Kamoun S. Molecular genetics of pathogenic oomycetes. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2: 191–199. pmid:12684368
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Tyler BM, Tripathy S, Zhang X, Dehal P, Jiang RH, Aerts A, et al. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science. 2006;313: 1261–1266. pmid:16946064
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kamoun S, Furzer O, Jones JD, Judelson HS, Ali GS, Dalio RJ, et al. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;16: 413–434. pmid:25178392
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Lamour KH, Stam R, Jupe J, Huitema E. The oomycete broad-host-range pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13: 329–337. pmid:22013895
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Lamour KH, Mudge J, Gobena D, Hurtado-Gonzales OP, Schmutz J, Kuo A, et al. Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25: 1350–1360. pmid:22712506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Dou D, Kale SD, Wang X, Jiang RH, Bruce NA, Arredondo FD, et al.RXLR-mediated entry of Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b into soybean cells does not require pathogen-encoded machinery. Plant Cell. 2008b;20: 1930–1947.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Whisson SC, Boevink PC, Moleleki L, Avrova AO, Morales JG, Gilroy EM, et al. A translocation signal for delivery of oomycete effector proteins into host plant cells. Nature. 2007;450: 115–118. pmid:17914356
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Morgan W, Kamoun S. RXLR effectors of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10: 332–338. pmid:17707688
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, Jiang RH, Handsaker RE, Cano LM, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature. 2009;461: 393–398. pmid:19741609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Torto TA, Li S, Styer A, Huitema E, Testa A, Gow NA, et al. EST mining and functional expression assays identify extracellular effector proteins from the plant pathogen Phytophthora. Genome Res. 2003;13: 1675–1685. pmid:12840044
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Schornack S, van Damme M, Bozkurt TO, Cano LM, Smoker M, Thines M, et al. Ancient class of translocated oomycete effectors targets the host nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 17421–17426. pmid:20847293
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Liu T, Ye W, Ru Y, Yang X, Gu B, Tao K, et al. Two host cytoplasmic effectors are required for pathogenesis of Phytophthora sojae by suppression of host defenses. Plant Physiol. 2011;155: 490–501. pmid:21071601
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Shen D, Liu T, Ye W, Liu L, Liu P, Wu Y, et al. Gene duplication and fragment recombination drive functional diversification of a superfamily of cytoplasmic effectors in Phytophthora sojae. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e70036. pmid:23922898
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Stam R, Jupe J, Howden AJ, Morris JA, Boevink PC, Hedley PE, et al. Identification and characterisation CRN effectors in Phytophthora capsici shows modularity and functional diversity. PLoS ONE. 2013a;8: e59517. pmid:23536880
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Stam R, Howden AJ, Delgado-Cerezo M, TM MMA, Motion GB, Pham J, et al. Characterization of cell death inducing Phytophthora capsici CRN effectors suggests diverse activities in the host nucleus. Front Plant Sci. 2013b;4: 387.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. van Damme M, Bozkurt TO, Cakir C, Schornack S, Sklenar J, Jones AM, et al. The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans translocates the CRN8 kinase into host plant cells. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002875. pmid:22927814
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Rajput NA, Zhang M, Ru Y, Liu T, Xu J, Liu L, et al. Phytophthora sojae effector PsCRN70 suppresses plant defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e98114. pmid:24858571
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Yu XL, Tang JL, Wang QQ, Ye WW, Tao K, Duan S, et al. The RxLR effector Avh241 from Phytophthora sojae requires plasma membrane localization to induce plant cell death. New Phytol. 2012;196: 247–260. pmid:22816601
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Wang Y, Dou D, Wang X, Li A, Sheng Y, Hua C, et al. The PsCZF1 gene encoding a C2H2 zinc finger protein is required for growth, development and pathogenesis in Phytophthora sojae. Microb Pathog. 2009;47: 78–86. pmid:19447167
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Dou D, Kale SD, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang X, et al. Conserved C-terminal motifs required for avirulence and suppression of cell death by Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b. Plant Cell. 2008a;20: 1118–1133. pmid:18390593
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Hellens R, Mullineaux P, Klee H. Technical Focus:a guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5: 446–451. pmid:11044722
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Dong S, Zhang Z, Zheng X, Wang Y. Mammalian pro-apoptotic bax gene enhances tobacco resistance to pathogens. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27: 1559–1569. pmid:18509654
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Nguyen HP, Chakravarthy S, Velasquez AC, McLane HL, Zeng L, Nakayashiki H, et al. Methods to study PAMP-triggered immunity using tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010;23: 991–999. pmid:20615110
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Nasir KH, Takahashi Y, Ito A, Saitoh H, Matsumura H, Kanziaki H, et al. High-throughput in planta expression screening identifies a class II ethylene-responsive element binding factor-like protein that regulates plant cell death and non-host resistance. Plant J. 2005;43: 491–505. pmid:16098104
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Takemoto D, Hardham AR, Jones DA. Differences in cell death induction by Phytophthora elicitins are determined by signal components downstream of MAP kinase kinase in different species of Nicotiana and cultivars of Brassica rapa and Raphanus sativus. Plant Physiol. 2005;138: 1491–1504. pmid:15980203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 10171–10176. pmid:19520826
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Shen QH, Saijo Y, Mauch S, Biskup C, Bieri S, Keller B, et al. Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate-specific and basal disease-resistance responses. Science. 2007;315:1098–103. pmid:17185563
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Dong S, Yin W, Kong G, Yang X, Qutob D, Chen Q, et al. Phytophthora sojae avirulence effector Avr3b is a secreted NADH and ADP-ribose pyrophosphorylase that modulates plant immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e100235331.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Bos JI, Kanneganti TD, Young C, Cakir C, Huitema E, Win J, et al. The C-terminal half of Phytophthora infestans RXLR effector AVR3a is sufficient to trigger R3a-mediated hypersensitivity and suppress INF1-induced cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2006;48: 165–176. pmid:16965554
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Sohn KH, Lei R, Nemri A, Jones JD. The downy mildew effector proteins ATR1 and ATR13 promote disease susceptibility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 4077–4090 pmid:18165328
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Dong S, Qutob D, Tedman-Jones J, Kuflu K, Wang Y, Tyler BM, et al. The Phytophthora sojae avirulence locus Avr3c encodes a multi-copy RXLR effector with sequence polymorphisms among pathogen strains. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e5556. pmid:19440541
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Wang Q, Han C, Ferreira AO, Yu X, Ye W, Tripathy S, et al. Transcriptional programming and functional interactions within the Phytophthora sojae RXLR effector repertoire. Plant Cell. 2011;23: 2064–2086. pmid:21653195
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Coll NS, Epple P, Dangl JL. Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18: 1247–1256 pmid:21475301
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Kaminaka H, Nake C, Epple P, Dittgen J, Schutze K, Chaban C, et al. bZIP10-LSD1 antagonism modulates basal defense and cell death in Arabidopsis following infection. EMBO J. 2006;25: 4400–4411. pmid:16957775
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Rusterucci C, Aviv DH, Holt BF 3rd, Dangl JL, Parker JE. The disease resistance signaling components EDS1 and PAD4 are essential regulators of the cell death pathway controlled by LSD1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001;13: 2211–2224. pmid:11595797
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Watanabe N, Lam E. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 functions as an attenuator of biotic and abiotic types of cell death. Plant J. 2006;45: 884–894. pmid:16507080
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Chen XR, Xing YP, Li YP, Tong YH, Xu JY. RNA-Seq reveals infection-related gene expression changes in Phytophthora capsici. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e74588. pmid:24019970
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Jupe J, Stam R, Howden AJ, Morris JA, Zhang R, Hedley PE, et al. Phytophthora capsici-tomato interaction features dramatic shifts in gene expression associated with a hemi-biotrophic lifestyle. Genome Biol. 2013;14: R63. pmid:23799990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Bierne H, Cossart P. When bacteria target the nucleus: the emerging family of nucleomodulins. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14: 622–633. pmid:22289128
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006;124: 803–814. pmid:16497589
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Hogenhout SA, Van der Hoorn RA, Terauchi R, Kamoun S. Emerging concepts in effector biology of plant-associated organisms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22: 115–122. pmid:19132864
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Fu ZQ, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64: 839–863. pmid:23373699
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444: 323–329. pmid:17108957
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Dou D, Zhou JM. Phytopathogen effectors subverting host immunity: different foes, similar battleground. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12: 484–495. pmid:23084917
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Kazan K, Lyons R. Intervention of phytohormone pathways by pathogen effectors. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 2285–2309. pmid:24920334
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Kamoun S. Molecular genetics of pathogenic oomycetes. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2: 191–199. pmid:12684368
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Tyler BM, Tripathy S, Zhang X, Dehal P, Jiang RH, Aerts A, et al. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science. 2006;313: 1261–1266. pmid:16946064
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kamoun S, Furzer O, Jones JD, Judelson HS, Ali GS, Dalio RJ, et al. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;16: 413–434. pmid:25178392
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Lamour KH, Stam R, Jupe J, Huitema E. The oomycete broad-host-range pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13: 329–337. pmid:22013895
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Lamour KH, Mudge J, Gobena D, Hurtado-Gonzales OP, Schmutz J, Kuo A, et al. Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25: 1350–1360. pmid:22712506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Dou D, Kale SD, Wang X, Jiang RH, Bruce NA, Arredondo FD, et al.RXLR-mediated entry of Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b into soybean cells does not require pathogen-encoded machinery. Plant Cell. 2008b;20: 1930–1947.
View Article
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Whisson SC, Boevink PC, Moleleki L, Avrova AO, Morales JG, Gilroy EM, et al. A translocation signal for delivery of oomycete effector proteins into host plant cells. Nature. 2007;450: 115–118. pmid:17914356
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Morgan W, Kamoun S. RXLR effectors of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10: 332–338. pmid:17707688
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, Jiang RH, Handsaker RE, Cano LM, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature. 2009;461: 393–398. pmid:19741609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Torto TA, Li S, Styer A, Huitema E, Testa A, Gow NA, et al. EST mining and functional expression assays identify extracellular effector proteins from the plant pathogen Phytophthora. Genome Res. 2003;13: 1675–1685. pmid:12840044
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Schornack S, van Damme M, Bozkurt TO, Cano LM, Smoker M, Thines M, et al. Ancient class of translocated oomycete effectors targets the host nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 17421–17426. pmid:20847293
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Liu T, Ye W, Ru Y, Yang X, Gu B, Tao K, et al. Two host cytoplasmic effectors are required for pathogenesis of Phytophthora sojae by suppression of host defenses. Plant Physiol. 2011;155: 490–501. pmid:21071601
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Shen D, Liu T, Ye W, Liu L, Liu P, Wu Y, et al. Gene duplication and fragment recombination drive functional diversification of a superfamily of cytoplasmic effectors in Phytophthora sojae. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e70036. pmid:23922898
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Stam R, Jupe J, Howden AJ, Morris JA, Boevink PC, Hedley PE, et al. Identification and characterisation CRN effectors in Phytophthora capsici shows modularity and functional diversity. PLoS ONE. 2013a;8: e59517. pmid:23536880
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Stam R, Howden AJ, Delgado-Cerezo M, TM MMA, Motion GB, Pham J, et al. Characterization of cell death inducing Phytophthora capsici CRN effectors suggests diverse activities in the host nucleus. Front Plant Sci. 2013b;4: 387.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. van Damme M, Bozkurt TO, Cakir C, Schornack S, Sklenar J, Jones AM, et al. The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans translocates the CRN8 kinase into host plant cells. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1002875. pmid:22927814
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Rajput NA, Zhang M, Ru Y, Liu T, Xu J, Liu L, et al. Phytophthora sojae effector PsCRN70 suppresses plant defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e98114. pmid:24858571
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Yu XL, Tang JL, Wang QQ, Ye WW, Tao K, Duan S, et al. The RxLR effector Avh241 from Phytophthora sojae requires plasma membrane localization to induce plant cell death. New Phytol. 2012;196: 247–260. pmid:22816601
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wang Y, Dou D, Wang X, Li A, Sheng Y, Hua C, et al. The PsCZF1 gene encoding a C2H2 zinc finger protein is required for growth, development and pathogenesis in Phytophthora sojae. Microb Pathog. 2009;47: 78–86. pmid:19447167
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Dou D, Kale SD, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang X, et al. Conserved C-terminal motifs required for avirulence and suppression of cell death by Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b. Plant Cell. 2008a;20: 1118–1133. pmid:18390593
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Hellens R, Mullineaux P, Klee H. Technical Focus:a guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5: 446–451. pmid:11044722
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Dong S, Zhang Z, Zheng X, Wang Y. Mammalian pro-apoptotic bax gene enhances tobacco resistance to pathogens. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27: 1559–1569. pmid:18509654
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Nguyen HP, Chakravarthy S, Velasquez AC, McLane HL, Zeng L, Nakayashiki H, et al. Methods to study PAMP-triggered immunity using tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010;23: 991–999. pmid:20615110
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Nasir KH, Takahashi Y, Ito A, Saitoh H, Matsumura H, Kanziaki H, et al. High-throughput in planta expression screening identifies a class II ethylene-responsive element binding factor-like protein that regulates plant cell death and non-host resistance. Plant J. 2005;43: 491–505. pmid:16098104
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Takemoto D, Hardham AR, Jones DA. Differences in cell death induction by Phytophthora elicitins are determined by signal components downstream of MAP kinase kinase in different species of Nicotiana and cultivars of Brassica rapa and Raphanus sativus. Plant Physiol. 2005;138: 1491–1504. pmid:15980203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 10171–10176. pmid:19520826
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Shen QH, Saijo Y, Mauch S, Biskup C, Bieri S, Keller B, et al. Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate-specific and basal disease-resistance responses. Science. 2007;315:1098–103. pmid:17185563
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Dong S, Yin W, Kong G, Yang X, Qutob D, Chen Q, et al. Phytophthora sojae avirulence effector Avr3b is a secreted NADH and ADP-ribose pyrophosphorylase that modulates plant immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e100235331.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Bos JI, Kanneganti TD, Young C, Cakir C, Huitema E, Win J, et al. The C-terminal half of Phytophthora infestans RXLR effector AVR3a is sufficient to trigger R3a-mediated hypersensitivity and suppress INF1-induced cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2006;48: 165–176. pmid:16965554
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Sohn KH, Lei R, Nemri A, Jones JD. The downy mildew effector proteins ATR1 and ATR13 promote disease susceptibility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 4077–4090 pmid:18165328
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Dong S, Qutob D, Tedman-Jones J, Kuflu K, Wang Y, Tyler BM, et al. The Phytophthora sojae avirulence locus Avr3c encodes a multi-copy RXLR effector with sequence polymorphisms among pathogen strains. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e5556. pmid:19440541
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Wang Q, Han C, Ferreira AO, Yu X, Ye W, Tripathy S, et al. Transcriptional programming and functional interactions within the Phytophthora sojae RXLR effector repertoire. Plant Cell. 2011;23: 2064–2086. pmid:21653195
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Coll NS, Epple P, Dangl JL. Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18: 1247–1256 pmid:21475301
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Kaminaka H, Nake C, Epple P, Dittgen J, Schutze K, Chaban C, et al. bZIP10-LSD1 antagonism modulates basal defense and cell death in Arabidopsis following infection. EMBO J. 2006;25: 4400–4411. pmid:16957775
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Rusterucci C, Aviv DH, Holt BF 3rd, Dangl JL, Parker JE. The disease resistance signaling components EDS1 and PAD4 are essential regulators of the cell death pathway controlled by LSD1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001;13: 2211–2224. pmid:11595797
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Watanabe N, Lam E. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 functions as an attenuator of biotic and abiotic types of cell death. Plant J. 2006;45: 884–894. pmid:16507080
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Chen XR, Xing YP, Li YP, Tong YH, Xu JY. RNA-Seq reveals infection-related gene expression changes in Phytophthora capsici. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e74588. pmid:24019970
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Jupe J, Stam R, Howden AJ, Morris JA, Zhang R, Hedley PE, et al. Phytophthora capsici-tomato interaction features dramatic shifts in gene expression associated with a hemi-biotrophic lifestyle. Genome Biol. 2013;14: R63. pmid:23799990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Bierne H, Cossart P. When bacteria target the nucleus: the emerging family of nucleomodulins. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14: 622–633. pmid:22289128
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plasmid construction

Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration assays

Pathogenicity assay

Phytophthora capsici inoculation and in vitro samples

RNA extraction and real time quantitative RT-PCR

Protein extraction and Western blot

Confocal microscopy

Stable silencing of PcCRN4 in P. capsici

Oxygen burst detection and callose deposition assay

Results

Identification of PcCRN4 homologs and cell death inducing activities in three plants

PcCRN4 is expressed at infection stages

PcCRN4 requires nuclear localization to trigger cell death

PcCRN4 enhances Phytophthora virulence on N. benthamiana and decreases ROS accumulation

PcCRN4 is required for full virulence

PcCRN4 may manipulate cell death by regulating expression of cell death-related genes

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Phenotypic analyses of CRN effector domains in planta.

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

S2 Table. Summary of the screened CRN effectors.

Author Contributions

References