Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Investment in Constitutive Immune Function by North American Elk Experimentally Maintained at Two Different Population Densities

  • Cynthia J. Downs ,

    cdowns@unr.edu

    Affiliation Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Kelley M. Stewart,

    Affiliation Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Brian L. Dick

    Affiliation Pacific Northwest Research Station, United States Forest Service, La Grande, Oregon, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

Natural selection favors individuals that respond with effective and appropriate immune responses to macro or microparasites. Animals living in populations close to ecological carrying capacity experience increased intraspecific competition, and as a result are often in poor nutritional condition. Nutritional condition, in turn, affects the amount of endogenous resources that are available for investment in immune function. Our objective was to understand the relationship between immune function and density dependence mediated by trade-offs between immune function, nutritional condition, and reproduction. To determine how immune function relates to density-dependent processes, we quantified bacteria killing ability, hemolytic-complement activity, and nutritional condition of North American elk (Cervus elaphus) from populations maintained at experimentally high- and low-population densities. When compared with elk from the low-density population, those from the high-density population had higher bacteria killing ability and hemolytic-complement activity despite their lower nutritional condition. Similarly, when compared with adults, yearlings had higher bacteria killing ability, higher hemolytic-complement activity, and lower nutritional condition. Pregnancy status and lactational status did not change either measure of constitutive immunity. Density-dependent processes affected both nutritional condition and investment in constitutive immune function. Although the mechanism for how density affects immunity is ambiguous, we hypothesize two possibilities: (i) individuals in higher population densities and in poorer nutritional condition invested more into constitutive immune defenses, or (ii) had higher parasite loads causing higher induced immune responses. Those explanations are not mutually exclusive, and might be synergistic, but overall our results provide stronger support for the hypothesis that animals in poorer nutritional condition invest more in constitutive immune defenses then animals in better nutritional condition. This intriguing hypothesis should be investigated further within the larger framework of the cost and benefit structure of immune responses.

Citation: Downs CJ, Stewart KM, Dick BL (2015) Investment in Constitutive Immune Function by North American Elk Experimentally Maintained at Two Different Population Densities. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0125586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586

Academic Editor: Daniel E. Crocker, Sonoma State University, UNITED STATES

Received: October 13, 2014; Accepted: March 25, 2015; Published: May 20, 2015

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by a Hatch grant awarded by Nevada Agriculture Experimental Station and funding from the University of Nevada Reno, and US Forest Service grant awarded to KMS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Natural selection favors individuals that respond with effective and appropriate immune responses to macro or microparasites [1, 2]. Vigorous immune function might be best for fending off parasites, but also may lead to immunopathology or diversion of resources from growth or reproduction [3–5]. Conversely, if immune function is not sufficient to clear or resist the parasite and if an individual does not tolerate a parasite, animals might succumb to disease or parasites [3, 4, 6]. Indeed, optimal immune responses that balance costs and benefits are strongly correlated with survival (e.g., [7, 8]).

Included within the equation that determines optimal immune defense are the energetic and nutritional costs of maintaining and mounting immune responses [9–11]. Those costs add demands for energy and nutrients above the cost of maintaining the body, which may result in diversion of resources from production of tissues during growth or reproduction [11–13]. Tissue production is most likely to be compromised if food supply is low or food intake is reduced by endogenous processes (such as anorexia associated with an acute phase response [14]) that suppress appetite or impair digestion and absorption [15, 16]. Individuals in populations at high density relative to ecological carrying capacity experience reduced food availability because of increased intraspecific competition [17–20]. As a result, individuals in high-density populations exhibit poorer nutritional condition, lower pregnancy rates, lower recruitment rates, older age at first reproduction, and are more likely to pause in annual reproduction than those in low-density populations [17, 20–23]. Within this framework, individuals in high-density populations also may invest sub-optionally in immune function.

As more individuals occur on a landscape they occur in larger groups and are closer together, and this close proximity of individuals to one another also favors transmission of disease ([24, 25, 26] but see exceptions therein). This effect also could lead to density-dependent prophylaxis—preemptive increases in investment in constitutive immunity triggered by increased population density—as observed in insects [27, 28]. Alternatively, investment in immune function might increase in high-density populations because of increased transmission of parasites leading to increased parasite loads [1]. Costs of immunity and repair are thus part of density-dependent feedbacks, which also are manifested as reduced growth of the population by slowing rates of reproduction and growth of juveniles, as well as increasing rates of mortality, which ultimately slows population growth [17, 20, 21, 29]. Investigations of the relationship between population density and physiological responses have primarily focused on small rodents in captive studies or natural irruptions [15, 24, 30–33]. Herein, we present a study system that uses long-term, experimental manipulation of a population of large mammals at large spatial scales to investigate how population density affects investment in constitutive immune responses.

Constitutive immune responses are always present and are capable of immediate physiological defense [34], and investment in constitutive immune responses may be quantified in several ways including two effective and related assays: bacteria killing ability and hemolytic-complement activity [35]. The bacteria killing assay assesses the ability to eliminate an ecologically relevant pathogen, and thereby provides a functionally relevant assessment of host immune function. Specifically, this assay characterizes an immune response that involves the action of opsonizing proteins (mainly complement, but also acute phase proteins) and natural antibodies (predominantly IgM and IgA [35, 36]). Natural antibodies are the constitutive repertoire of antibodies that are present in small concentrations and circulate regardless of previous exposure to a parasite [2]. Because of the bacteria we used in the bacteria killing assay, we are mainly quantifying complement levels. The hemolytic-complement activity assay quantifies overall pathway integrity, cell lysis, and functional activity of the complement pathway [36, 37], a part of the innate immune response that consists of a series of proteins present in the serum [38].

Our objective was to understand the relationship between immune function and density dependence as mediated by correlations among immune function, nutritional condition, and reproduction using North American elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus). As a long-lived iteroparous species, elk have evolved strategies for energy allocation that maximize reproductive success over their lifetime by placing less emphasis on any single reproductive event [39–42]. To test how immune function relates to reproductive status (pregnancy and recruitment) and population density, we used North American elk from populations maintained at experimentally high and low population densities on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range. Elk in the high-density population at Starkey exhibit classic density-dependent responses in reproductive traits, and those responses are driven by changes in nutritional status caused by increased intraspecific competition on summer range [17]. We hypothesized that population density affects investment in immune function and we predicted that individuals from high-density population have lower immune responses, because they have fewer resources available to invest in costly immune function. Within this framework, we also hypothesized that individuals will not allocate resources away from immune function in early stages of pregnancy. Thus, we predicted that pregnant individuals have higher immune function than those that are not pregnant. When resources are limiting, females that successfully recruit an offspring are typically in poorer nutritional condition entering winter than those that did not successfully recruit an offspring [17]; thus, we predicted that females that successfully recruited an offspring have lower nutritional status and lower immune function than non-reproductive females entering winter. Finally, yearling elk are still investing resources into growth and rarely are reproductive [43]; therefore we predicted that yearlings have lower immune functions than adult elk.

Materials and methods

Study Area and Experimental Design

We conducted research during winter 2012–2013 on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range (hereafter, Starkey 45°12′N, 118°3′W). Starkey is managed as a formal research site by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station [44]. Starkey is situated in the Blue Mountains of northeastern Oregon, USA, and is located about 35 km southwest of La Grande, Oregon, USA [17, 45]. Starkey is an ideal location to test questions about how investment in immune function correlates with life histories because extensive data are collected, including nutritional condition and reproductive status, and maintained on the majority of individuals in the study areas.

Starkey encompasses 10,125 ha, and elevations range from 1,120 to 1,500 m. Since 1987, Starkey has been surrounded by a 2.4-m fence that prevents immigration or emigration of large herbivores, including migration to traditional winter ranges [44, 46]. During the summer, elk are free-ranging in one of three study areas: main study (10,125 ha), northeast-east (842 ha), and northeast-west (610 ha). Our study was focused in the northeast (east and west) study areas, which have equal proportions of habitats to accommodate experimental comparisons of population densities of elk [17, 45]. The northeast-east study area had a high population density (11.9 elk km-2, 100 individuals) since 2002, while the northeast-west section had a low population density relative to carrying capacity (4.1 elk km-2, 24 individuals) [17, 45]. For this study, we define ecological carrying capacity as the number of animals at or near equilibrium with their food supply [21, 47].

Because elk cannot migrate to traditional winter range, they are maintained on a winter feedground. During the early winter, elk are captured in holding pastures, processed at a handling facility, and then released onto winter feedground where they are fed a maintenance diet of alfalfa hay [17]. Elk from both the high- and low-density areas were housed together on the winter feedground and experienced the same conditions over winter, thus changes in nutritional status resulted from resource availability and intraspecific competition on summer range [17]. As elk entered the feedground during winter, they were captured and moved via a system of alleys through the handling facility for collection of data on individual animals [17, 44]. Yearlings, young (<1 year old), and adult females (≥2 years old) were moved through the handling facility and each individual was identified by unique ear tags [17, 45].

We quantified nutritional status of individuals by measuring maximal depth of subcutaneous fat on the rump [17, 48–51], and determined pregnancy and lactation status. Maximum depth of subcutaneous fat on the point of the hip was measured via ultrasonography as a measure of nutritional condition [17, 48, 49]. We used palpation to determine if individuals were lactating, and we used lactational status as an index of recruitment of young that was specific to the individual female [17, 42]. Blood was collected from the jugular veins of adult and yearling females, centrifuged to separate serum from red blood cells, and serum was frozen immediately at -30°C for later analyses. One portion of the serum was analyzed for pregnancy-specific protein B (Bio Tracking, Moscow, Idaho, USA) to determine pregnancy status of individuals [17, 52]. A second portion was frozen, transported to the lab, and used for quantifying immunocompetance.

Immunocompetance assays

We quantified constitutive immune responses using two closely related assays: a bacteria killing assay and a hemolytic-complement activity assay. Prior to performing these assays, serum was thawed and filtered with syringe filters (Acrodisc syringe filters with supor membrane, pore size of 0.2 μm, Pall Life Science) to remove hemoglobin released by lysing of red blood cells during processing of whole blood [53].

We used bacteria killing assays to measure a functional response by the constitutive, innate immune system against a relevant pathogen, Escherichia coli [54]. We performed assays on serum samples, following Zysling et al. [55], using E. coli (Epower Microorganisms 0483E7, ATCC 8739, MicroBioLogics, St. Cloud, MN), and a 1:40 dilution of serum samples in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. Briefly, 5 μl of a sample was mixed with 295 μl of LB broth, and then 20 μl of E. coli solution (~5000 bacteria ml-1) was added. We also made two positive controls of 200 μl LB broth and 20 μl of E. coli solution. Samples and controls were vortexed and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. We then vortexed samples and controls again and plated 50 μl aliquots onto LB agar in petri dishes. We made three replicate plates for each sample and tested samples in batches of ≤11 samples to minimize differences in incubation time of the first and last sample plated. One of the positive controls was plated at the beginning and another one was plated at the end of each batch; each positive control was plated in triplicate. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, after which bacteria colonies were counted. We found no difference in the number of colonies that grew on the controls plated at the beginning and end of each batch (F1,87 = 1.29, P = 0.26); consequently, we used all 6 positive control plates to determine the mean number of control colonies for a particular batch. Samples were compared with the positive controls from their batch. Bactericidal capacity was calculated as one minus the mean number of colonies from each sample, divided by the mean number of colonies from the positive controls, and multiplied by 100 (i.e., % bacteria killed relative to the positive control).

Hemolytic-complement activity in serum was measured with a method adapted from Sinclair and Lochmiller [56]. Briefly, we diluted serum to a 1:40 dilution with dextrose gelatin veronal buffer (DGV, catalog # 10-539B, Lonza Inc., Allendale, NJ, USA). In a 96-well plate, we mixed 80 μl of each sample with 25 μl of 0.06% suspension of sheep red blood cells (SRBC) (Innovative Research, Novi, MI, USA) in DGV and 25 μl of a 1:40 dilution of rabbit anti-sheep red blood cell antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, product # S1389) in DGV. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. We also used a 100% lysis control of 65 μl of deionized water and a 0% lysis control of 65 μl DGV in duplicate. We added 25 μl of diluted SRBC, but no antibodies, to both controls. The plate was shaken gently for 5 min. on a plate shaker, and then incubated for 90 min. at 37°C. The plate was then centrifuged for 5 min. at 84 rcf, and 60 ul of supernatant was transferred to a new 96-well plate. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm.

The original protocol called for determining the dilution of serum required to lyse 50% of the SRBC in culture, or CH50 [37, 56]. Ideally, one should use two dilutions of the sample that encompasses the CH50 to help ensure the points used fall on the linear part of a sigmoidal curve that represents the lysing activity in this assay. When we calibrated the assay to determine the two appropriate dilutions for calculating the CH50, we observed that variation in our serum samples precluded the use of a single pair of serum dilutions for all samples and that some samples had very low lysing ability across the range of dilutions tested. Hence, we measured hemolytic-complement activity as the percentage of SRBC lysed at a single dilution as a representation of hemolytic-complement activity. This choice limits the scope of our inferences to this single concentration but it still provided information about the hemolytic-complement activity at a single concentration and allows for inferences within a framework comparing hemolytic-complement activity of individuals. Whenever possible, we recommend that researchers use two dilutions to improve the breadth of inference that can be draw about hemolytic complement activity and to facilitate comparisons among different studies.

Prior to running our immunocompetence assays we tested a separate set of serum samples from elk to determine if freezing samples affected results of immunocompetence assays as reported in previous work quantifying bacteria killing ability in house sparrows (Passer domesticus Linnaeus) [57]. Details are provided in S1 Text. Briefly, our results indicated that freezing did not degrade elk serum samples; rather, the samples in the refrigerator degraded significantly during the three days required to transport them from the field site to the laboratory.

Data Processing and Statistics:

We used generalized linear models (GLM) with an identity link function, to investigate what factors affected percent bacteria killed and percent SRBC lysed. Errors had normal distributions and estimates were fit using maximum likelihood. Population density (high or low), age class (yearling or adult), lactation status (lactating or not lactating), pregnancy status (pregnant or not pregnant), and nutritional condition (maximal depth of subcutaneous fat, a continuous covariate) were included as fixed effects for models of both response variables.

Nutritional condition might be an important mediator of investment in immune responses, but might not be significant in the models of immune function, because nutritional condition also was associated with other potential predictors of immune function including lactation status, pregnancy status, and population density [17]. Thus, we determine how nutritional condition was affected by population density, age, lactation status, and pregnancy status with a GLM fit with an identity link function. Errors were normally distributed and estimates were fit using maximum likelihood. That analysis allowed us to determine if the pattern of estimated means for nutritional condition was similar to the pattern of estimated means for immune responses. For example, if individuals from the high-density population have the lowest nutritional condition and the lowest bacteria killing ability, then these results would support the hypothesis that density causes individuals to reduce investment in immune function because density reduced nutritional condition.

For all analyses we used Procedure GENMOD in SAS [58]. We used the procedures recommended by Zuur et al. [59] to explore our data and results to ensure that were not violating assumptions of our statistical models. Specifically, during initial exploration of our models for all response variables we included interactions terms between class variables and body condition, but those interactions were not significant so they were not included in the final model. We ensured that were not violating assumptions of the models by using q-q-plots to inspect distribution of residuals, visually inspecting conditional boxplots to test for equal variances, and using Cook’s distance to check for data points with leverage [59]. Data used in our analyses are in S1 Table.

Ethics Statement

All procedures for handling animals were in accordance with guidelines established by the American Society of Mammalogists for capture and handling of wild mammals for research [60], complied with US laws, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Starkey Project (Protocol #92-F-0004) and the University of Nevada Reno (Protocol #00565), which is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.

Results

We included 64 female elk in our statistical analyses. Details of GLM model estimates for each response variable are located in S2 Table. Bacteria killing ability was significantly lower in the low-density population (n = 15) than the high-density population (n = 49, Wald χ21 = 6.23 P = 0.013; Fig 1B), and there was a pattern for higher bacteria killing ability in yearling elk (n = 11), when compared with adults (n = 53, Wald χ21 = 6.58, P = 0.010; Fig 2B). Bacteria killing ability did not differ according to pregnancy status (Wald χ21 = 0.46, P = 0.497; Fig 3B), lactation status (Wald χ21 = 1.31, P = 0.253; Fig 3E), or nutritional condition (β ± s.e. = 11.6± 8.8, Wald χ21 = 1.75, P = 0.186).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Constitutive immune responses and nutritional condition differed in North American elk maintained at different population densities.

Estimated mean (± s.e.) (A) nutritional condition as indicated by maximal subcutaneous fat, (B) bacteria killing ability, and (C) hemolytic-complement activity by density for North American elk on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range 2012–2013. Elk from the low-density population had higher bacteria killing ability, higher hemolytic-complement activity, and lower nutritional condition than elk from the high-density population. Population densities were relative to ecological carrying capacity. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) of pairwise comparisons following analysis of variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Constitutive immune responses and nutritional condition differed among adult and yearling North American elk.

Estimated mean (± s.e.) (A) nutritional condition as indicated by maximal subcutaneous fat, (B) bacteria killing ability, and (C) hemolytic-complement activity for adult and yearling North American elk on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range 2012–2013. Yearling elk had higher bacteria killing ability, higher hemolytic-complement activity and lower nutritional condition than adult elk. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) of pairwise comparisons following analysis of variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Constitutive immune responses and nutritional condition in pregnant and lactating North American elk.

Estimated means (± s.e.) of (A) nutritional condition as indicated by maximal subcutaneous fat, (B) bacteria killing ability, and (C) hermolytic-complement activity by pregnancy status and (D) nutritional condition, (E) bacteria killing ability, and (F) hemolytic complement activity by lactation status for North American elk on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, 2012–2013. Pregnant elk were in higher nutritional condition than non-pregnant elk, but they did not differ in bacteria killing ability or higher hemolytic-complement activity. Lactating elk were in lower-nutritional condition than non-lactating elk, but did no differ in bacteria killing ability or hemolytic complement activity. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) of pairwise comparisons following analysis of variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.g003

Hemolytic-complement activity was significantly lower in the low- (n = 15) than high-density population (n = 49, Wald χ21 = 5.12, P = 0.024; Fig 1C). Yearling elk (n = 11) had higher hemolytic-complement activity than adults (n = 53, Wald χ21 = 25.14, P< 0.001; Fig 2C). Hemolytic-complement activity did not differ by pregnancy status (Wald χ21 = 3.02, P = 0.082; Fig 3C) or lactation status (Wald χ21 = 0.46, P = 0.497; Fig 3F). Nutritional condition did not affect hemolytic-complement activity (β ± s.e. = 8.6 ± 6.3, Wald χ21 = 1.86, P = 0.173).

Nutritional condition differed significantly between population densities (Wald χ21 = 21.77, P<0.001; Fig 1A); individuals from the low-density population (n = 15) had 176% more fat than those from the high-density population (n = 49). Adults (n = 53) had subcutaneous fat that was 77% thicker than that of yearlings (n = 11, Wald χ21 = 4.16, P = 0.042; Fig 2A). Pregnant individuals (n = 28) had 105.8% thicker subcutaneous fat than non-pregnant individuals (n = 36, Wald χ21 = 11.56, P<0.001; Fig 3A). Those individuals that were not lactating (n = 45) had 138.3% thicker subcutaneous fat than those that were lactating (n = 19, Wald χ21 = 14.88, P <0.001; Fig 3D).

Discussion

We did not observe any direct relationship between nutritional condition constitutive immunity. Although nutritional condition is known to help mediate investment in immunity [2, 61, 62], investment decisions depend on the type of nutritional deficit, for example fat versus protein. From our data we can make inferences about how fat reserves affected investment in immune function, but other types of nutritional limitations are beyond the range of our data. For example, important limiting factor in investment in immunity [63–65], and protein deficiencies generally suppress immune function [66], and reduce resistance to infections [67]. Thus, some specific nutrient, rather than energy levels measured as fat reserves, may be more important for determining investment in immune function. Alternatively, we may have failed to find a direct link between nutritional condition and constitutive immunity because nutritional condition also was associated with other potential predictors of immune function, including lactation status, pregnancy status, and population density.

Contrary to our hypothesis, elk in the high-density population had higher constitutive immunity than elk in the low-density population, which were in better nutritional condition. We suggest two potential explanations for the patterns we observed. First, elk in the high-density population may have invested more in constitutive immune responses because they were in poor nutritional condition. Thus they invested in defenses that prevent the establishment of a parasite infection and to prevent the need to mount the more costly induced immune response. Alternatively, parasite burdens may have differed between the two populations leading to differential activation of the immune system. These explanations are not mutually exclusive, and may interact synergistically to increase differences in investment in constitutive immunity that we observed between the two population densities.

The first potential explanation for our results is that elk in the high-density population invested more in constitutive immune responses because they were in lower nutritional condition and at greater physiological risk from diseases and parasites, as opposed to having a higher parasite burdens. This explanation may appear to contradict the straightforward idea that nutritional limitations lead to reductions of immune function [11, 68]. Nevertheless, relative costs and benefits depend on the type of immune response. We measured responses that are part of the humoral immune system, a system that primarily uses globular proteins to recognize, bind, and remove pathogens [38, 69]. Maintenance of constitutive humoral responses are generally less costly than activated cellular immune responses or humoral responses during an infection [9, 70, 71]. Thus, maintenance of constitutive humoral responses that quickly clear and prevent the establishment of a parasite might be the least costly immune strategy. It follows that individuals in poor nutritional condition may benefit from higher investment in the lower-cost constitutive immunity to prevent and clear infections quickly, rather than having to mount a high-cost immune response once an infection becomes established. Indeed, wild-caught mallards (Anas platyrhynchos Linnaeus) in poor nutritional condition had lower viral loads when experimentally inoculated with influenza A viruses than did wild-caught individuals in greater nutritional condition or captive mallards [72].

The second potential explanation for our results is that elk in different population densities were subject to different parasite burdens. Models of parasite transmission typically assume that transmission increases with population density, thus the likelihood of acquiring a parasite also increases with population density when parasites are transmitted directly among individuals (reviewed by [25, 26], but see exceptions therein). This assumption has general support in the literature [73, 74], and indeed diseases have been suggested as a mechanism through which density-dependent processes affect populations [75]. In addition, most research suggests that susceptibility to parasites increases with declining nutritional condition ([76, 77], but see Arsnoe et al. [69] who found the opposite pattern in mallards), resulting in a synergistic interaction between nutritional condition and transmission of diseases [78]. As a result, elk from the high-density population may have higher parasite loads than those from the low-density population, and thus might have higher immune responses because constitutive immune responses increase during an immunological challenge [79]. In this instance, our assay would not have just measured baseline levels of measured immune components, but also would have measured elevated levels of those immune responses caused by an induced immune response.

At present we cannot definitively distinguish between these two hypothesized explanations. Nevertheless, we suspect that that nutritional condition, rather than parasite load, is driving our results. Elk on Starkey have been monitored for brucellosis and Leptospira periodically. No sample has ever come back with positive titers for brucellosis and there are no obvious disease epidemics in this population, although Leptospira is endemic in the population (BLD personal observation). Furthermore, elk from both study areas were housed together on the winter feedground and foraged on hay together during winter (nose to nose contact is common), thus differences in parasite burden alone is unlikely because parasites could be easily transmitted between individuals from the high or low density populations on the winter feedground. Moreover, mortalities of individuals on the winter feedground are generally the result of poor nutritional condition prior to entering the feedground, rather than disease [17].

Yearling elk, in general, had lower subcutaneous fat than adults (Fig 1C). Young individuals often have smaller fat reserves in part because of their smaller body size [80]. In addition, differences in nutritional condition between yearlings and adults, also resulted from yearlings continuing to allocate resources to growth rather than storage of energy [43]. Yearling elk had both higher hemolytic-complement activity and higher bacteria killing ability than did adults, despite having lower energy reserves (Fig 2). Our results were consistent with a study of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus), which reported that young born to food restricted females weighed less and had higher constitutive levels of antibodies, which indicated a negative relationship between nutritional condition and investment in constitutive immunity [81]. Our results with respect to age were also consistent with the explanation that nutritional condition dictated investment in constitutive immunity. Both our results concerning density and age group, the groups with the lowest fat reserves had the highest immune responses supporting the idea elk with lower fat reserves invest in frontline, constitutive immune responses that help prevent the establishment of parasites.

Results from the hemolytic-complement activity assay indicated that pregnancy did not alter investment in the complement pathway. Thus, pregnancy did not appear to draw resources away from investment in constitutive, complement activity. Similarly, Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus Pallas) did not differ in bacteria killing ability based on pregnancy status [82], although fast-paced species tend to invest in reproduction over survival and often exhibit a trade-off between pregnancy and immune function [61, 62, 83–85]. Nevertheless, we measured immune function during the first trimester of pregnancy, which is less energetically demanding that later stages [80]. Indeed, other studies that examined the relationship between immune function and pregnancy measured immune function in later stages of reproduction when energetic investment in reproduction was greater. In Soay sheep (Ovia aries), individuals with higher indicators of high rates of division and antibody production by B and serum cells had a lower probability of successfully reproducing in females [86]. Hormones associated with pregnancy and the energy requirements of pregnancy are mechanistic explanations for trade-offs that have been found between investment in immune function and reproduction [3, 11, 87]. Those interactions, however, change over the course of pregnancy, and thus the likelihood of a tradeoff changes, and probably increases as pregnancy progresses. Those interactions create a complicated and dynamic relationship between immune function and reproduction [88], and more research into the mechanistic underpinnings of these results is required to illuminate how investment in constitutive immunity changes during pregnancy in free-roaming, slow-paced animals.

Elk in our study were captured during early winter, thus lactation status was a conservative index of successful recruitment of offspring [17, 42]. Our assessment of recruitment is a conservative index because some individuals that recruited an offspring may have stopped lactating prior to our sampling, whereas continuing to lactate after mortality of an offspring is unlikely [17, 42]. Lactating individuals had fewer fat reserves probably because of investment in reproduction, but did not alter levels of constitutive immunity (Fig 3F). Thus, our results also indicated the absence of a trade-off between investment in complement and reproductive success at this stage of the life cycle. At the time that we measured immune function in our study animals in early winter, the energetically expensive part of lactation when a neonate is provisioned solely by their mother’s milk had already occurred. Females in early winter likely were using lactation as a means of maintaining social bonds with their offspring [89], and lactation was primarily an indicator of survival of offspring and of recruitment. Thus, our experiment was really testing for lingering effects of the costs or reproduction on constitutive immunity, whereas most published results have focused on direct trade-offs between provisioning a neonate and immunity [11]. Although, our conclusion may appear to contradict most previous work indicating that provisioning offspring leads to decreased investment in immune function, measurement of immune function immediately after parturition likely is a better indicator of tradeoffs between immune function and reproduction [90–92].

Conclusion

Comparisons of elk in high- and low-density populations indicated that as population density of elk increased, nutritional condition declined and individuals increased investment in constitutive immune function. Differences between individuals from different densities could have resulted because individuals in poor nutritional condition invested more in constitutive immune defenses, or because individuals from high-population densities had higher parasite loads causing induced immune responses. When considering differences in immune function and nutritional condition between individuals from different population densities and different age classes, our results provide stronger support for the hypothesis that animals in poorer nutritional condition invest more in constitutive immune defenses than animals in better nutritional condition. This strategy might allow elk in poorer condition to prevent the establishment of an infection and to avoid having to mount expensive adaptive immune responses. This intriguing hypothesis should be investigated further within the larger framework of the costs and benefits of immune responses.

Our results also speak to the effects of density dependence on individual-level traits. Density-dependent mechanisms are mediated through intraspecific competition, via per capita availability of food and the subsequent influence of nutrition on reproduction and recruitment of young into the reproductive segment of the population [17–20]. As populations approach carrying capacity and resources become increasingly limited, some individuals do not gain adequate fat levels for both survival and reproduction; as a result, limited fat stores are allocated to survival over reproduction in slow-paced species, including elk [22, 42, 93–96]. Elk from the high-density population invested more in immune function than those from the low-density population, supporting our hypothesis that immune function is a trait that is mediated by population density. Our results support the premise that density-dependent regulation of immune function is important for understanding population demographics of species that show strong density dependence in their life histories.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Data used in analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Analysis of maximum likelihood parameter estimates for generalized linear models.

Parameter estimates for generalized linear models to test for differences in bacteria killing ability, hemolytic-complement activity, and nutritional condition among elk at different population densities, from different age classes, with different lactation status, and with different pregnancy status. Nutritional condition was used as a covariate in models for bacteria killing ability and hemolytic complement activity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Text. A comparison of effects of storage methods of elk blood on immune assays.

Methods and results for the experiment conducted to determine if freezing samples has a negative effect on bacteria killing ability and hemolytic-complement activity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125586.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Wisdom, Team Leader of the Starkey Project, the field staff at Starkey including R. Kennedy and D. Rea, and the rest of the staff at Starkey who maintain the Starkey Project and facilities and who manage and handle elk. We thank R. Crump for use of her laboratory facilities and M. Trugillo for help with laboratory work. R. T. Bowyer and six anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CJD KMS. Performed the experiments: CJD KMS BLD. Analyzed the data: CJD. Wrote the paper: CJD KMS.

References

  1. 1. Ardia DR, Parmentier HK, Vogel LA. The role of constraints and limitation in driving individual variation in immune response. Funct Ecol. 2011;25(1):61–73. pmid:WOS:000286468500007.
  2. 2. Downs CJ, Stewart KM. A primer in ecoimmunology and immunology for wildlife research and management. Calif Fish Game. 2014;100(3):369–93.
  3. 3. Martin LB, Weil ZM, Nelson RJ. Seasonal changes in vertebrate immune activity: mediation by physiological trade-offs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008;363(1490):321–39.
  4. 4. Råberg L, Stjernman M. Natural selection on immune responsiveness in blue tits Parus caeruleus. Evolution. 2003;57(7):1670–8. pmid:WOS:000184589300019.
  5. 5. Viney ME, Riley EM, Buchanan KL. Optimal immune responses: immunocompetence revisited. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(12):665–9. pmid:WOS:000233878700008.
  6. 6. Schmid-Hempel P. Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 2003;270(1513):357–66. pmid:WOS:000181320500004.
  7. 7. Nussey DH, Watt KA, Clark A, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Graham AL, et al. Multivariate immune defences and fitness in the wild: complex but ecologically important associations among plasma antibodies, health and survival. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2014;281(1779). doi: 2013293110.1098/rspb.2013.2931. pmid:WOS:000332382700021.
  8. 8. Wobeser GA. Disease in wild animals: investigation and management 2nd ed.. New York: Springer; 2007. 393 p.
    • 9. Demas GE, Chefer V, Talan MI, Nelson RJ. Metabolic costs of mounting an antigen-stimulated immune response in adult and aged C57BL/6J mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1997;273(5):R1631–R7. pmid:ISI:A1997YF56900010.
    • 10. Iseri VJ, Klasing KC. Dynamics of the systemic components of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) immune system following activation by Escherichia coli; implications for the costs of immunity. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 2013;40(3–4):248–57. pmid:WOS:000321091100004.
    • 11. Lochmiller RL, Deerenberg C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos. 2000;88(1):87–98. pmid:ISI:000085424600010.
    • 12. Downs CJ, Adelman JS, Demas GE. Mechanisms and methods in ecoimmunology: integrating within-organism and between-organism processes. Integr Comp Biol. 2014;(54):340–52. pmid:24944113
    • 13. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S. Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11(8):317–21. pmid:ISI:A1996UX90900006.
    • 14. Hart BL. Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 1988;12(2):123–37. pmid:ISI:A1988P853200004.
    • 15. Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM. Soay sheep: dynamics and selection in an island population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. 383 p.
      • 16. Scantlebury M, Waterman JM, Hillegass M, Speakman JR, Bennett NC. Energetic costs of parasitism in the Cape ground squirrel Xerus inauris. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007;274(1622):2169–77. pmid:17613450
      • 17. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Dick BL, Johnson BK, Kie JG. Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test. Oecologia. 2005;143(1):85–93. pmid:WOS:000227369700009.
      • 18. Schwartz CC, Hundertmark KJ. Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose. J Wildl Manage. 1993;57(3):454–68. pmid:WOS:A1993LN19900004.
      • 19. Sæther BE, Haagenrud H. Life history of the moose (Alces alces): fecundity rates in relation to age and carcass weight. J Mammal. 1983;64(2):226–32. pmid:WOS:A1983QR82900004.
      • 20. McCullough DR. The George Reserve deer herd: population ecology of a K-selected species [Michigan]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1979.
        • 21. Kie JG, Bowyer TR, Stewart KM. Ungulates in western coniferous forests: habitat relationships, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes. In: Zabel CJ, Anthony RG, editors. Mammal community dynamics: management and conservation in the coniferous forests of western North America Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 296–340
          • 22. Monteith KL, Bleich VC, Stephenson TR, Pierce BM, Conner MM, Kie JG, et al. Life-history characteristics of mule deer: Effects of nutrition in a variable environment. Wildl Monogr. 2014;186(1):1–62. pmid:WOS:000333642700001.
          • 23. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toigo C. Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2000:367–93.
            • 24. Anderson RM, May RM. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature. 1979;280(5721):361–7. pmid:WOS:A1979HE95900033.
            • 25. McCallum H, Barlow N, Hone J. How should pathogen transmission be modelled? Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16(6):295–300. pmid:WOS:000168721800017.
            • 26. Begon M, Bennett M, Bowers RG, French NP, Hazel SM, Turner J. A clarification of transmission terms in host-microparasite models: numbers, densities and areas. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129(1):147–53. pmid:WOS:000177607200020.
            • 27. Wilson K, Cotter SC. Density-dependent prophylaxis in insects. In: Ananthakrishnan TN, Whitman DW, editors. Phenotypic Pasticity of Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences. Plymouth, UK: Science Pub Inc; 2008. p. 381–420.
              • 28. Wilson K, Cotter SC, Reeson AF, Pell JK. Melanism and disease resistance in insects. Ecol Lett. 2001;4(6):637–49.
              • 29. McCullough DR. Density dependence and life-history strategies of ungulates. J Mammal. 1999;80(4):1130–46. pmid:WOS:000177533300005.
              • 30. Lochmiller RL. Immunocompetence and animal population regulation. Oikos. 1996:594–602.
                • 31. Arneberg P, Skorping A, Grenfell B, Read AF. Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 1998;265(1403):1283–9. pmid:WOS:000074967800003.
                • 32. Hudson PJ, Newborn D, Dobson AP. Regulation and stability of a free-living host-parasite system: Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. I. Monitoring and parasite reduction experiments. J Anim Ecol. 1992:477–86.
                • 33. Scott ME. Regulation of mouse colony abundance by Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Parasitology. 1987;95(01):111–24.
                • 34. Schmid-Hempel P, Ebert D. On the evolutionary ecology of specific immune defence. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(1):27–32. pmid:WOS:000180007200008.
                • 35. Demas GE, Zysling DA, Beechler BR, Muehlenbein MP, French SS. Beyond phytohaemagglutinin: assessing vertebrate immune function across ecological contexts. J Anim Ecol. 2011;80(4):710–30. pmid:WOS:000291309500002.
                • 36. French SS, DeNardo DF, Greives TJ, Strand CR, Demas GE. Human disturbance alters endocrine and immune responses in the Galapagos marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). Horm Behav. 2010;58(5):792–9. pmid:WOS:000284798100013.
                • 37. Mayer MM. Complement and complement fixation. In: Kabat EA, Mayer MM, editors. Experimental Immunochemistry. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas; 1948.
                  • 38. Murphy KP, Travers P, Walport M. Janeway's immunobiology. seventh ed: Garland Science; 2007. 928 p.
                    • 39. Drent RH, Daan S. The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea. 1980;68(1–4):225–52.
                    • 40. Gaillard JM, Yoccoz NG. Temporal variation in survival of mammals: A case of environmental canalization? Ecology. 2003;84(12):3294–306. pmid:WOS:000187973500019.
                    • 41. Hadley GL, Rotella JJ, Garrott RA. Evaluation of reproductive costs for weddell seals in Erebus Bay, Antarctica. J Anim Ecol. 2007;76(3):448–58. pmid:WOS:000245608900004.
                    • 42. Morano S, Stewart KM, Sedinger JS, Nicolai CA, Vavra M. Life-history strategies of North American elk: trade-offs associated with reproduction and survival. J Mammal. 2013;94(1):162–72. pmid:WOS:000315366900017.
                    • 43. Parker KL, Barboza PS, Gillingham MP. Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(1):57–69. pmid:WOS:000262510400007.
                    • 44. Rowland MM, Bryant LD, Johnson BK, Noyes JH, Wisdom MJ, Thomas JW. Starkey Project: history facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate research. Collections. 1997.
                      • 45. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Ruess RW, Dick BL, Kie JG. Herbivore optimization by north American elk: Consequences for theory and management. Wildl Monogr. 2006;(167):1–24. pmid:WOS:000244136700001.
                      • 46. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK. Temporospatial distributions of elk, mule deer, and cattle: Resource partitioning and competitive displacement. J Mammal. 2002;83(1):229–44. pmid:WOS:000174042000023.
                      • 47. Caughley G. What is this thing called carying capacity? In: Boyce MS, Hayden-Wing LD, editors. North American elk: ecology, behavior and management. Laramie, WY, U.S.A.: University of Wyoming Press; 1979. p. 2–8.
                        • 48. Keech MA, Stephenson TR, Bowyer TR, Van Ballenberghe V, Vet Hoer JM. Relationships between blood-serum variables and depth of rump fat in Alaskan moose. Alces. 1998;34(1):173–9.
                        • 49. Stephenson TR, Hundertmark KJ, Schwartz CC, Van Ballenberghe V. Predicting body fat and body mass in moose with ultrasonography. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool. 1998;76(4):717–22. pmid:WOS:000075437000015.
                        • 50. Cook RC, Cook JG, Stephenson TR, Myers WL, McCorquodale SM, Vales DJ, et al. Revisions of rump fat and body scoring indices for deer, elk, and moose. J Wildl Manage. 2010;74(4):880–96. pmid:WOS:000277305800028.
                        • 51. Stephenson TR, Bleich VC, Pierce BM, Mulcahy GP. Validation of mule deer body composition using in vivo and post-mortem indices of nutritional condition. Wildl Soc Bull. 2002;30(2):557–64. pmid:WOS:000176822700032.
                        • 52. Noyes JH, Sasser RG, Johnson BK, Bryant LD, Alexander B. Accuracy of pregnancy detection by serum protein (PSPB) in elk. Wildl Soc Bull. 1997;25(3):695–8. pmid:WOS:A1997YH63300023.
                        • 53. Flies AS. Ecology and immune function in the spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University 2012.
                          • 54. Tieleman IB, Williams JB, Ricklefs RE, Klasing KC. Constitutive innate immunity is a component of the pace-of-life syndrome in tropical birds. Proc R Soc Lond, Ser B: Biol Sci. 2005;272(1573):1715–20.
                          • 55. Zysling DA, Garst AD, Demas GE. Photoperiod and food restriction differentially affect reproductive and immune responses in Siberian hamsters Phodopus sungorus. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(5):979–88. pmid:WOS:000269976800015.
                          • 56. Sinclair JA, Lochmiller RL. The winter immunoenhancement hypothesis: associations among immunity, density, and survival in prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) populations. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool. 2000;78(2):254–64. pmid:WOS:000085820200011.
                          • 57. Liebl AL, Martin LB. Simple quantification of blood and plasma antimicrobial capacity using spectrophotometry. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(6):1091–6. pmid:WOS:000271632200008.
                          • 58. Institute S. SAS system for windows. Cary, North Carolina, USA: SAS Institute; 2010.
                            • 59. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;1(1):3–14.
                            • 60. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, Amer Soc M. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal. 2011;92(1):235–53. pmid:WOS:000287898700025.
                            • 61. French SS, DeNardo DF, Moore MC. Trade-offs between the reproductive and immune systems: Facultative responses to resources or obligate responses to reproduction? Am Nat. 2007;170(1):79–89. pmid:WOS:000247527200009.
                            • 62. French SS, Johnston GIH, Moore MC. Immune activity suppresses reproduction in food-limited female tree lizards Urosaurus ornatus. Funct Ecol. 2007;21(6):1115–22. pmid:WOS:000250985100013.
                            • 63. Brunner FS, Schmid-Hempel P, Barribeau SM. Protein-poor diet reduces host-specific immune gene expression in Bombus terrestris. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;281(1786):20140128. pmid:24850921
                            • 64. Klasing KC. Nutritional modulation of resistance to infectious diseases. Poult Sci. 1998;77(8):1119–25. pmid:WOS:000075129500009.
                            • 65. Klasing KC, Leshchinsky TV. Functions, costs, and benefits of the immune system during development and growth. Adams NJ, Slotow RH, editors. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Afica; 1999. 2817–35 p.
                              • 66. Chandra RK. 1990 McCollum Award Lecture. Nutrition and immunity: lessons from the past and new insights into the future. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53(5):1087–101. pmid:WOS:A1991FJ40800001.
                              • 67. Koski KG, Scott ME. Gastrointestinal nematodes, nutrition and immunity: breaking the negative spiral. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21(1):297–321.
                              • 68. Stearns SC. The evolution of life histories. New York, NY Oxford University Press; 1992. 264 p.
                                • 69. Muehlenbein MP. Evolutionary medicine, immunity and infectious diseases. In: Muehlenbein MP, editor. Human evolutionary biology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 459–90.
                                  • 70. Derting TL, Compton S. Immune response, not immune maintenance, is energetically costly in wild white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Physiol Biochem Zool. 2003;76(5):744–52. pmid:WOS:000187514400014.
                                  • 71. Armitage SAO, Thompson JJW, Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT. Examining costs of induced and constitutive immune investment in Tenebrio molitor. J Evol Biol. 2003;16(5):1038–44. pmid:WOS:000185203300027.
                                  • 72. Arsnoe DM, Ip HS, Owen JC. Influence of body condition on influenza A virus infection in mallard ducks: experimental infection data. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(8). doi: e2263310.1371/journal.pone.0022633. pmid:WOS:000294125500010.
                                  • 73. Dwyer G. The roles of density, stage, and patchiness in the transmission of an insect virus. Ecology. 1991;72(2):559–74. pmid:WOS:A1991FE24800014.
                                  • 74. Grenfell BT, Dobson AP. Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. 521 p.
                                    • 75. Anderson RM. The influence of parasitic infection on the dynamics of host populations growth. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR, editors. Population dynamics: the 29th symposium of the British Ecological Society. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1979. p. 245–82.
                                      • 76. Scrimshaw NS, SanGiovanni JP. Synergism of nutrition, infection, and immunity: An overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(2):S464–S77. pmid:WOS:A1997XN54700043.
                                      • 77. Scrimshaw NS, Taylor CE, Gordon JE. Interactions of nutrition and infection: World Health Organization Geneva; 1968.
                                        • 78. Beldomenico PM, Begon M. Disease spread, susceptibility and infection intensity: vicious circles? Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(1):21–7. pmid:WOS:000274074500005.
                                        • 79. Millet S, Bennett J, Lee KA, Hau M, Klasing KC. Quantifying and comparing constitutive immunity across avian species. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007;31(2):188–201. pmid:16870251
                                        • 80. Barboza PS, Parker KL, Hume ID, editors. Integrative Wildlife Nutrition. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.
                                          • 81. Landete-Castillejos T, García A, Gómez JÁ, Laborda J, Gallego L. Effects of nutritional stress during lactation on immunity costs and indices of future reproduction in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Biol Reprod. 2002;67(5):1613–20. pmid:12390895
                                          • 82. French SS, Greives TJ, Zysling DA, Chester EM, Demas GE. Leptin increases maternal investment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276(1675):4003–11. pmid:19710064
                                          • 83. Ardia DR, Schat KA, Winkler DW. Reproductive effort reduces long-term immune function in breeding tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 2003;270(1525):1679–83. pmid:WOS:000184952100004.
                                          • 84. Gustafsson L, Nordling D, Andersson MS, Sheldon BC, Qvarnstrom A. Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 1994;346(1317):323–31. pmid:ISI:A1994PW43600008.
                                          • 85. Norris K, Anwar M, Read AF. Reproductive effort influences the prevalence of haematozoan parasites in great tits. J Anim Ecol. 1994;63(3):601–10. pmid:WOS:A1994NW73000010.
                                          • 86. Graham AL, Hayward AD, Watt KA, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Nussey DH. Fitness correlates of heritable variation in antibody responsiveness in a wild mammal. Science. 2010;330(6004):662–5. pmid:WOS:000283580600046.
                                          • 87. Demas GE, Nelson RJ. Ecoimmunology. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2012. 636 p.
                                            • 88. Mor G, Cardenas I. The Immune System in Pregnancy: A Unique Complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):425–33. pmid:WOS:000277521800003.
                                            • 89. Hirth DH. Mother-young behavior in white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Southwest Nat. 1985:297–302.
                                              • 90. Nordling D, Andersson M, Zohari S, Gustafsson L. Reproductive effort reduces specific immune response and parasite resistance. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 1998;265(1403):1291–8. pmid:WOS:000074967800004.
                                              • 91. Ardia DR. Individual quality mediates trade-offs between reproductive effort and immune function in tree swallows. J Anim Ecol. 2005;74(3):517–24.
                                              • 92. Deerenberg C, Arpanius V, Daan S, Bos N. Reproductive effort decreases antibody responsiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1997;264(1384):1021–9.
                                              • 93. Mautz WW. Sledding on a bushy hillside: the fat cycle in deer. Wildl Soc Bull. 1978;6:88–90.
                                              • 94. Bårdsen BJ, Henden JA, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Stien A. Plastic reproductive allocation as a buffer against environmental stochasticity—linking life history and population dynamics to climate. Oikos. 2011;120(2):245–57. pmid:WOS:000286383500012.
                                              • 95. Bårdsen BJ, Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Langeland K. Observational evidence of risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Oecologia. 2010;162(3):627–39. pmid:WOS:000274518000010.
                                              • 96. Monteith KL, Stephenson TR, Bleich VC, Conner MM, Pierce BM, Bowyer RT. Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal. J Anim Ecol. 2013;82(2):377–88. pmid:WOS:000315122100010.