Nitrogenous Nutrients Promote the Growth and Toxicity of Dinophysis acuminata during Estuarine Bloom Events

Theresa K. Hattenrath-Lehmann; Maria A. Marcoval; Heidi Mittlesdorf; Jennifer A. Goleski; Zhihong Wang; Bennie Haynes; Steve L. Morton; Christopher J. Gobler

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124148

Abstract

Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) is a globally significant human health syndrome most commonly caused by dinoflagellates within the genus Dinophysis. While blooms of harmful algae have frequently been linked to excessive nutrient loading, Dinophysis is a mixotrophic alga whose growth is typically associated with prey availability. Consequently, field studies of Dinophysis and nutrients have been rare. Here, the temporal dynamics of Dinophysis acuminata blooms, DSP toxins, and nutrients (nitrate, ammonium, phosphate, silicate, organic compounds) were examined over four years within two New York estuaries (Meetinghouse Creek and Northport Bay). Further, changes in the abundance and toxicity of D. acuminata were assessed during a series of nutrient amendment experiments performed over a three year period. During the study, Dinophysis acuminata blooms exceeding one million cells L-1 were observed in both estuaries. Highly significant (p<0.001) forward stepwise multivariate regression models of ecosystem observations demonstrated that D. acuminata abundances were positively dependent on multiple environmental parameters including ammonium (p = 0.007) while cellular toxin content was positively dependent on ammonium (p = 0.002) but negatively dependent on nitrate (p<0.001). Nitrogen- (N) and phosphorus- (P) containing inorganic and organic nutrients significantly enhanced D. acuminata densities in nearly all (13 of 14) experiments performed. Ammonium significantly increased cell densities in 10 of 11 experiments, while glutamine significantly enhanced cellular DSP content in 4 of 5 experiments examining this compound. Nutrients may have directly or indirectly enhanced D. acuminata abundances as densities of this mixotroph during experiments were significantly correlated with multiple members of the planktonic community (phytoflagellates and Mesodinium). Collectively, this study demonstrates that nutrient loading and more specifically N-loading promotes the growth and toxicity of D. acuminata populations in coastal zones.

Citation: Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, Marcoval MA, Mittlesdorf H, Goleski JA, Wang Z, Haynes B, et al. (2015) Nitrogenous Nutrients Promote the Growth and Toxicity of Dinophysis acuminata during Estuarine Bloom Events. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0124148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148

Academic Editor: Hans G. Dam, University of Connecticut, UNITED STATES

Received: January 6, 2015; Accepted: March 2, 2015; Published: April 20, 2015

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New York Sea Grant (R/CMB-38-NYCT) and NOAA’s Monitoring and Event Response to Harmful Algal Blooms (MERHAB) program (NA11NOS4780027). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The spatial and temporal expansion and increased intensity of HABs is a globally recognized phenomenon [1, 2]. Marine HABs associated with human health syndromes, for example, paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP), are a growing human health and economic concern in many coastal regions [3–5]. These HABs are often associated with substantial economic losses due to the closure of toxic shellfish beds [6–8]. Given the human health threats that these toxin-producing blooms pose and the global increase in these events [1, 9] more research is needed to understand what promotes and sustains these blooms.

Anthropogenic loading of nutrients and organic matter are known to play a central role in the outbreak of multiple HABs [1–3, 10, 11]. Several studies have demonstrated that inorganic nitrogen (ammonium, nitrate) promotes the growth of various HABs [3, 11–13]. Similarly, multiple culture and field investigations have reported the stimulation of several HAB species by different dissolved organic substrates including urea, amino acids, peptides, humic acids, B-vitamins and uncharacterized organic substances [2, 3, 11, 14–18]. Such mixotrophic tendencies of harmful algae are not surprising given that the evolution of pathways to incorporate N from other sources beyond DIN would afford a competitive advantage over other phytoplankton when inorganic sources are depleted [3, 19]. Moreover, phagotrophy combined with phototrophy has been shown to significantly increase the growth rates of several HABs in comparison to strict autotrophic growth [19–21]. While the effects of both inorganic and organic nutrients on the growth and toxicity of multiple HAB species have been assessed, these effects are not fully understood for the mixotrophic dinoflagellate, Dinophysis acuminata.

Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) is a globally significant human health syndrome most commonly caused by dinoflagellates of the genus Dinophysis [1, 9, 22] with few cases associated with the benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima [23, 24]. Dinophysis spp. synthesize okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxins (DTXs), the causative toxins of DSP, as well as the pectenotoxins (PTXs) [25, 26] which are not associated with DSP but may be hepatotoxic and may promote the formation of tumors in mammals [25, 27]. While DSP is common in regions of Europe, South America and Asia [1, 9, 22], prior to 2008 North America had experienced few Dinophysis-related closures with all but one of these events occurring in Canada [28–31]. In recent years, however, North America has witnessed an expansion of Dinophysis blooms yielding shellfish containing DSP toxins exceeding the USFDA action level (160 ng g^-1 of shellfish tissue) on the east (NY) [32], west (WA) [33] and Gulf coasts (TX) [34–36] of the United States. Interestingly, Dinophysis spp. have been historically found in these regions [33, 37–39] prior to the incidences of shellfish toxicity, suggesting these blooms may have become more intense and/or toxic in recent years. Understanding the factors promoting such phase shifts merit further exploration.

While the nutritional ecology of most harmful algae has been explored at length, there has been a dearth of such research on Dinophysis [40]. Only within the past decade have cultures of Dinophysis been established after positively identifying the food source of this obligate mixotroph, the ciliate Mesodinium (= Myrionecta), and establishing a three-step culturing system involving cryptophytes [41]. Therefore, nearly all information known regarding Dinophysis and nutrients has been gleaned from field observations, which have come to conflicting conclusions. Some correlative field studies have found no relationship between Dinophysis densities and nutrient concentrations [6, 42, 43]. A study in South Africa using ¹⁵N-labeled compounds found that D. acuminata–dominated communities had a high affinity for recycled N (ammonium), a trait that may provide a competitive advantage in nitrate depleted waters [44]. Additionally, the only study investigating the effects of nutrients on the production of okadaic acid and its derivatives in Dinophysis found contrasting results for the two Dinophysis species investigated [45]. Notably, the most recent and comprehensive review of Dinophysis ecology focused solely on phagotrophy as a prime nutritional mode for this alga [22] and thus far there is no evidence on the ability of Dinophysis to directly use nutrients [40]. Given the limited and conflicting nature of results obtained to date, more research is needed to understand the effects of nutrients on the growth and toxicity of Dinophysis.

This multi-year (2008–2012) field investigation assessed the dynamics of Dinophysis acuminata, its associated toxins, okadaic acid (OA), dinophysistoxins-1 (DTX1) and pectenotoxins (PTXs), and nutrients in two eutrophic estuaries. The effects of nutrients (organic and inorganic, nitrogen- and phosphorus-containing) on the abundance and toxicity of Dinophysis acuminata were examined by conducting nutrient amendment experiments using natural plankton communities from these two systems. In addition, forward stepwise regression analyses were performed to relate Dinophysis and its toxins to multiple environmental parameters while correlation matrices were used to relate Dinophysis to other members of the phytoplankton community during experiments.

Materials and Methods

Field sampling

Field samples were collected on a weekly to twice-weekly basis from March through September during 2008 through 2012. Samples were collected in Northport Harbor (40°53.500′N, 73°21.434′W; Fig 1), a shallow (2 – 4m) well mixed system within the southeastern portion of the Northport-Huntington Bay complex, located on the north shore of Long Island, NY, USA [32]. Field samples were also collected weekly from March through August 2011 and 2012 from a second site in NY, Meetinghouse Creek, a tidal tributary located in the Peconic Estuary (40°56.314′N, 72°37.119′W; Fig 1). At each station, a YSI© 556 probe was used to record surface temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen. Water was collected with permission by Peter Houmere from the Britannia Marina in Northport, NY. Further permission was not needed since seawater collection is not regulated by any municipal government agency.

Download:

Fig 1. Field sampling (star) and sewage treatment plant outflow (circle) locations in the Northport-Huntington Bay complex and Meetinghouse Creek, New York, USA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.g001

Subsurface water (~0.25m) was filtered (in duplicate) for nutrient analysis using precombusted (4 hr @ 450^°C) glass fiber filters (GF/F, 0.7 μm pore size) and frozen in acid washed plastic scintillation vials. Filtrate was analyzed colorimetrically for nitrate + nitrite, orthophosphate, ammonium and silicate [46, 47]. Total dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus (TDN, TDP) were analyzed by persulfate oxidation [48] and dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus (DON and DOP) levels were calculated by subtracting concentrations of nitrate + nitrite and ammonium or orthophosphate from concentrations of TDN and TDP, respectively. These analyses provided complete recovery of nitrate + nitrite, orthophosphate, ammonium, TDN, and TDP from Environmental Resources Associates (ERA, Golden, CO) certified reference material. For the determination of chlorophyll a, water was filtered in triplicate using glass fiber filters (GF/F; nominal pore size 0.7 μm) and measured using standard fluorometric techniques described in Welschmeyer [49]. Water samples were preserved in acidic Lugol’s solution at a final concentration of 2% (v/v). Dinophysis cell densities were enumerated using a 1mL Sedgewick-Rafter slide under a compound microscope using whole water samples and concentrated preserved water samples (n = 1 for 2008–2011, n = 2 for 2012). Prior to 2010 whole water samples were used for enumeration; however post-2010 concentrates were made to decrease the limit of detection as Dinophysis cell densities were often a relatively small portion of the total phytoplankton community and are therefore expressed as cells per L. Concentrated water samples were made by sieving 1–2L of water through either a 200 μm or 64 μm mesh (to eliminate large zooplankton) and then onto a 20 μm sieve that was backwashed into a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Counts made on plankton concentrates were not significantly different from direct counts on whole water. Detection limits for whole water and concentrated samples were 1,000 cells L⁻¹ and 7 cells L⁻¹, respectively.

Meteorological data including temperature, precipitation, wind direction and wind intensity were obtained for the months of April, May and June from the National Weather Service’s monitoring station in Islip, NY, USA which is ~20km from Northport. The 2008 bloom year was not considered in statistical analyses as the sampling resolution during June of that year was not equivalent to that of 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Analysis of toxins in phytoplankton concentrates

Several liters of seawater were pre-sieved through a 200 μm mesh (to eliminate large zooplankton) and subsequently concentrated on a 20 μm sieve and backwashed into 15ml centrifuge tubes. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 11 minutes and the supernatant aspirated without disturbing the cell pellet. Cell pellets were kept frozen at −20°C until further analysis. Algal pellets were resuspended in a known volume of 100% aqueous methanol, homogenized by vortex mixing and probe-sonicated (Branson 1450 sonicator) on ice at 30% amplitude, followed by centrifugation at 3400 × g for 10 min. The methanolic supernatants were filtered with a 0.2 μm syringe filter in preparation for analysis. Samples were analyzed for the presence of DSP toxins and the co-eluted pectenotoxins using liquid chromatography (HP 1100 series HPLC; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (4000 QTRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer; AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) using the method described by Gerssen, Mulder [50] with modifications. LC separation was performed on a X-Bridge C18 (150 × 3 mm, 5 μm) column (Waters, Milford, MA) using a mobile phase of water (A) and acetonitrile/water (90:10, V/V) (B), both containing 6.7 mM ammonium hydroxide under gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min⁻¹ (linear gradient from 1min of 10% B to 90% B at 12 min, hold for 3 min, then return to 10% B at 17 min and hold for 4 min). The detection of DSP toxins by MS was achieved by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in negative ion mode for OA, DTX1, and DTX2 (for OA and DTX2 with MRM transitions of m/z 803.5 → 113.1and 255.1, for DTX1 with MRM transitions of m/z 817.5 → 113.1 and 255.1), and in positive ion mode for PTX2 and its isomers (MRM transitions of m/z 876.5 → 213.1 and 823.5), and PTX11 and its isomers (MRM transitions of m/z 892.5 → 213.1 and 839.5). Certified standards of OA, DTX1, DTX2, and PTX2 were available for toxin determination from NRC (Halifax, Canada) and RIKILT (Institute of Food Safety, The Netherlands). No standards were available for PTX11 and its isomers and PTX2 isomers; their concentrations were calculated approximately using PTX2 standards. PTX11 and its isomers showed different LC retention times and similar product ion spectra but differences at fragments between m/z 250 to 350 and some isomers could not match any of the published product ion spectra in this small mass range [51, 52]. PTX2 and its isomers also showed identical product ion spectra but different LC retention time. As such, all PTX concentrations were combined and reported as total PTXs (herein referred to as PTX). The detection limit was about 0.5 pg of OA, 0.65 pg of DTX1, 0.4 pg of DTX2, and 0.25 pg of PTX2 on LC column.

The toxin samples presented herein were not subjected to alkaline hydrolysis and therefore represent free acids (i.e. esterified toxins are not included) and are therefore lower than the total OA [32, 34]. This study did not quantify extracellular toxins which can account for a substantial fraction of the total DSP toxin pool [53–55]; the present study was well underway prior to the discovery of the importance of these extracellular toxins from Dinophysis and hence they were not considered here.

Nutrient amendment experiments

To assess the impact of organic matter and nutrient loading on the abundance and toxicity of Dinophysis acuminata, a series of nutrient amendment experiments (dates initiated in parentheses) were performed during 2008 (12-May, 19-May and 26-May), 2010 (14-June, 22-June and 28-June) and 2011 (6-June, 13-June, 21-June, 27-June and 6-July). Triplicate bottles (2.5 L) were filled with water from Northport Harbor. While grazers were not removed from the water used to fill experimental bottles, stock water was kept well-mixed to ensure that grazers and phytoplankton were distributed evenly among all bottles. An unamended control was established along with several treatments (not all treatments were added on all experimental dates) including 20 μM nitrate, 20 μM ammonium, 10 μM urea (= 20 μM N), 10 μM glutamine (= 20 μM N), 2 μM phosphate, 100pM vitamin B₁₂, 20 μM ammonium + 100pM vitamin B_12, and ~20 μM DON equivalent of high molecular weight organic matter from sewage treatment plant effluent (HMW STP) which also contained 5 μM ammonium. High molecular weight (>1 kDa, Millipore) organic matter from sewage treatment plant effluent was isolated and concentrated from the Riverhead Sewer District plant which is located in Riverhead, NY, ~50 km east of Northport and ~2 km west of Meetinghouse Creek. High molecular weight organic matter was isolated via tangential flow filtration as described by Gobler and Sanudo-Wilhelmy [56]. The use of tangential flow filtration ensures that high molecular weight organic material is concentrated while concentrations of low molecular weight compounds including inorganic nutrients remained unchanged [56]. Additional experiments were performed using bloom water from a second New York tributary, Meetinghouse Creek, during 2011 (6-April, 16-April and 9-May). Triplicate bottles (1 L) were filled with water from Meetinghouse Creek and an unamended control was established along with the treatments 100pM vitamin B₁₂ and 100nM vitamin B₁. All treatment concentrations were within the range of levels found in Long Island estuaries [57, 58], including Northport Bay [12], with the exception of glutamine which is typically present at submicromolar concentrations [59] but was added at equimolar levels of N for comparison with other nitrogen sources and vitamin B₁ which can be required in large amounts by algal cultures [58]. Experiments did not involve any direct measurements of N or P incorporation. All bottles (2.5 or 1 L polycarbonate bottles) were incubated without mixing for ~48 h in an incubation chamber where light (photo period = 14:10 light:dark cycle) and temperature conditions where adjusted to match those found at the study site for each individual experiment. At the end of the 48 h incubation, toxin samples and size fractionated chlorophyll a (whole and >20 μm, chlorophyll samples were available only for Northport Bay experiments) were collected and analyzed as described above. Dinophysis cells and other members of the phytoplankton community were enumerated from samples preserved in Lugol’s solution. Plankton were identified and enumerated using a 1 mL Sedgewick-Rafter slide under a compound microscope. Cells larger than 10 μm were grouped as dinoflagellates, flagellates, diatoms (pennate vs. centric) and ciliates, and identified to genus level when possible. Phytoflagellates were generally too small (<10 μm) to identify and therefore some of the groups of flagellates, such as cryptophytes, that are potential indirect prey items for Dinophysis [40] were indistinguishable from other flagellates. Only Dinophysis densities were enumerated for Meetinghouse Creek experiments.

Statistical analyses

For all experiments, differences among treatments were assessed via a one- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SigmaStat within SigmaPlot 11.0; when data sets failed normality tests, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVAs by ranks were performed. The Student-Newman-Keuls method was used as a post hoc, pairwise, multiple comparison procedures. A one-way ANOVA was used for interannual comparisons of nutrient concentrations, nutrient ratios, and meteorological data between years or seasons. Additionally, Spearman’s rank order correlation matrices were used to assess the extent to which Dinophysis densities co-varied with other members of the plankton community during experiments. Lastly, multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the dependence of Dinophysis acuminata abundances and toxicity on all measured environmental variables (i.e. inorganic nutrients, organic nutrients, plankton groups, temperature, salinity, chlorophyll a, etc) using forward stepwise selection (F to enter p < 0.049; F to remove p > 0.050) in SigmaStat within SigmaPlot 11.0. Cell densities were log transformed prior to analysis. The small bloom (Table 1) that occurred in 2009 during which okadaic acid or pectenotoxins were not detected [32] was not considered in statistical analyses.

Download:

Table 1. Peak Dinophysis acuminata densities and toxin concentrations in two New York estuaries, Northport Bay and Meetinghouse Creek.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.t001

Results

Dynamics of Dinophysis, toxins, nutrients and meteorological conditions in New York estuaries

Dense Dinophysis acuminata blooms were observed in Meetinghouse Creek and Northport Bay, with peak densities typically occurring between late April and June, at temperatures of 13–16°C and 19–24°C (13–17°C in 2008), for each respective estuary. When D. acuminata was present in the water column, temperature and surface salinities ranged from 8.7 to 26.6°C (mean ± SD = 18.9 ± 4.6°C) and 17.7 to 26.0 (mean ± SD = 24.0 ± 1) for Northport Bay, and 10.6 to 26.7°C (mean ± SD = 16.5 ± 5.2°C) and 8.2 to 26.7 (mean ± SD = 21.7 ± 5.3) for Meetinghouse Creek. Water column temperatures in Northport Bay were not statistically (p = 0.10) different among bloom years. In Northport Bay, the largest D. acuminata bloom occurred in 2011 reaching ~1.3 million cells L⁻¹, followed by 2012, 2010, 2008, and 2009, with maximal densities of 123,000, 116,000, 39,500 and 12,000 cells L⁻¹, respectively (Table 1 and Fig 2). Paralleling D. acuminata densities, maximal particulate toxin concentrations in Northport Bay occurred in 2011 with free OA = 4.2 pg mL⁻¹, free DTX1 = 20.4 pg mL⁻¹, and total PTX = 2,878 pg mL⁻¹, while toxins were not detected in 2009 (Table 1). In 2012, D. acuminata densities in Meetinghouse Creek reached ~2.1 million cells L⁻¹ (Table 1) during a bloom that persisted for ~2 months. Similar to Northport Bay, PTX was the most abundant particulate toxin measured in Meetinghouse Creek followed by free DTX1 and free OA, with concentrations of 6,770, 161, and 19.6 pg mL⁻¹, respectively (Table 1). While there are multiple Prorocentrum spp. that often co-occur with Dinophysis: 1) none of these species are known DSP producers and 2) toxins were never detected when Prorocentrum was present and Dinophysis was absent.

Download:

Fig 2. Log Dinophysis acuminata densities (cells L^-1), and the inorganic nutrients, ammonium, nitrate and phosphate (μM) in Northport Bay, NY, USA during 2008–2012.

Points are means while error bars represent the SD of duplicate samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.g002

Overall, mean chlorophyll a, and nutrient concentrations and ratios in Northport Bay varied interannually but were not significantly different among years (Table 2). Over the course of the entire study, mean concentrations of chlorophyll a, ammonium, nitrate, phosphate and silicate were 13.5 ± 2.6 μg L⁻¹, 3.42 ± 0.46, 12.1 ± 1.13, 1.24 ± 0.14, and 33.7 ± 2.22 μM, respectively (Table 2). Dissolved organic N and P (DON, DOP) concentrations were 20.2 ± 1.10 and 0.80 ± 0.07 μM, while total dissolved N and P (TDN, TDP) were 35.7 ± 1.48 and 2.03 ± 0.16 μM, respectively (Table 2). Mean DIN:DIP, DON:DOP and TDN:TDP ratios were 20.6 ± 2.50, 35.3 ± 3.85 and 22.9 ± 1.73, respectively (Table 2). Finally, DIN:Si, DON:Si and TDN:Si were 0.53 ± 0.04, 0.75 ± 0.05 and 1.28 ± 0.07, respectively (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Chlorophyll a (μg L^-1), inorganic nutrients (ammonium, nitrate, phosphate, silicate), total dissolved and organic nutrients (μM) as well as nutrient ratios over the course of Dinophysis acuminata blooms in Northport Bay from 2008–2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.t002

During the four years DSP toxins were detected (2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012), nitrogen (ammonium, nitrate, TDN, DON) and phosphorus (phosphate, TDP, DOP) concentrations were lower during the peak of the Dinophysis acuminata bloom compared to before and after the peak of the bloom, although these decreases were rarely statistically significant (Fig 2 and Table 3). Overall chlorophyll a concentrations during the peak of the D. acuminata bloom compared to before and after the peak of the bloom were highly variable across years (Table 3). Chlorophyll a concentrations (34.3 ± 17.4 μg L⁻¹) during the large 2011 D. acuminata bloom were significantly (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney) higher compared to before and after the bloom (11.4 ± 4.9 μg L⁻¹; Table 3). Forward stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to determine the dependence of both Dinophysis acuminata abundances and cellular toxin content on multiple environmental variables (Table 4). A highly significant model (R = 0.87; p<0.001) predicted D. acuminata abundances were positively and strongly dependent on temperature (p<0.001), salinity (p<0.001), chlorophyll a (p = 0.002), ammonium (p = 0.007), positively, but more weakly dependent on pennate diatoms (p = 0.04), and were weakly, negatively dependent on phytoflagellates (p = 0.02; Table 4). The best multivariate linear regression model for predicting the cellular toxin content of D. acuminata during blooms was also highly significant (R = 0.60; p<0.001) and was positively dependent on ammonium (p = 0.002) and negatively dependent on nitrate (p<0.001; Table 4).

Download:

Table 3. Chlorophyll a, and mean nutrient concentrations and ratios at the peak of the bloom compared to before and after the peak of the bloom (when cells where present) for Northport Bay 2008–2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.t003

Download:

Table 4. Multiple regression of Dinophysis acuminata abundances and toxin content per Dinophysis cell on environmental variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.t004

Consistent with water column temperatures, mean atmospheric temperatures were not significantly different among bloom years (mean ± SD = 17.1 ± 5.4, 16.2 ± 5.6, and 16.4 ± 5.3°C for 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in precipitation or wind intensity among bloom years. Wind direction, however, was significantly different among years (April through June; specifically 2010 vs. 2011, p<0.05; Tukey), with winds blowing from the SW (226 ± 81°) in 2010, S (179 ± 89°) in 2011, and the SW (203 ± 92°) in 2012. The wind direction for April 2011 (S, 184 ± 93°) was significantly (p<0.05, Tukey) different than both April 2010 (SW, 242 ± 82°) and 2012 (SW, 246 ± 89°).

Nutrient amendment experiments

The addition of both inorganic and organic nutrients enhanced the abundances of Dinophysis acuminata in 13 of 14 experiments performed. In field experiments conducted over three years in Northport Bay, ammonium consistently and significantly increased Dinophysis densities (4–625%) compared to the control in nearly every experiment in which that compound was used (10 of 11 experiments; p<0.01 for all; Fig 3). In 6 of 8 experiments performed, the addition of vitamin B₁₂ significantly increased Dinophysis densities 7–125% compared to the control (p<0.05 for all; Fig 3). High molecular weight organic matter isolated from a sewage treatment plant (HMW STP) significantly increased Dinophysis densities up to 130% compared to the control in 3 of 5 experiments with that material (p<0.05 for all; Fig 3). Additions of nitrate, phosphate, urea, or glutamine yielded less consistent results, causing statistically significant increases in Dinophysis densities up to 400, 225, 100 and 650%, respectively, in 1 of 3, 3 of 6, 1 of 3, and 4 of 8 experiments performed, respectively (Fig 3). The addition of ammonium and vitamin B₁₂ together was examined on 14, 22, and 28 June 2010 and yielded significant increases (up to 270%; p<0.001) in Dinophysis densities compared to the control on 14 and 28 June, with only the 14 June yield being significantly greater than either individual addition (Fig 3). In a small fraction of cases Dinophysis densities significantly decreased with the addition of nutrients (e.g. 19 and 26 May). Overall phytoplankton growth for both size fractions (whole and >20μm) was positive with the exception of 27-June (2011, whole chlorophyll a) and 21-June (2011, >20μm) where net growth rates were negative (S1–S4 Tables). The chlorophyll-specific growth rates significantly increased in response to nitrate and ammonium during most experiments (p<0.05; S1–S4 Tables). During the experiments conducted in Meetinghouse Creek in 2011, the addition of vitamins B₁ and B₁₂ significantly enhanced the abundance of D. acuminata in two of three experiments, increasing Dinophysis densities up to 250% (p<0.05) and 330% (p<0.05), respectively, compared to the control (6 and 16-April; Fig 4).

Download:

Fig 3. Dinophysis acuminata densities (cells mL^-1) at the end of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York. Bars are means while error bars represent the SD of triplicate bottles.

Asterisks indicate treatments that are significantly different compared to the unamended control. C = Control, N = Nitrate, P = Phosphate, U = Urea, A = Ammonium, G = Glutamine, B₁₂ = vitamin B₁₂, A+ B₁₂ = Ammonium + vitamin B₁₂, STP = high molecular weight sewage treatment plant organic matter.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Dinophysis acuminata densities (cells mL^-1) at the end of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2011 using water collected from Meetinghouse Creek, New York.

Bars are means while error bars represent the SD of triplicate bottles. Asterisks indicate treatments that are significantly different from the unamended control. C = Control, B₁₂ = vitamin B₁₂ and B₁ = vitamin B₁.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.g004

Spearman’s correlation matrices were generated using the densities of Dinophysis and other members of the planktonic community within experimental bottles at the end of experiments performed in 2008, 2010 and 2011. For each year, Dinophysis densities were significantly, but inversely, correlated with the densities of autotrophic flagellates (2008: R = −0.46, p<0.05; 2010: R = −0.84, p<0.001; 2011: R = −0.82, p<0.001). In 2008 and 2010, Dinophysis densities were also significantly, but inversely, correlated with pennate diatoms (R = −0.54, 2008 and R = −0.34, 2010; p<0.05 for both years) and in 2011, Dinophysis densities were significantly, but inversely, correlated with the ciliate, Mesodinium (R = −0.28, p<0.01).

The addition of inorganic and organic nutrients enhanced the toxicity of Dinophysis acuminata in experiments conducted with Northport Bay bloom water during 2011. Glutamine significantly increased toxin content per cell (fg cell⁻¹) for okadaic acid (OA; p<0.05, 28–104%), dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1; p<0.05, 30–181%) and total pectenotoxins (total PTXs; p<0.05, 25–76%) compared to the control in 60%, 80%, and 40% of experiments conducted, respectively (Fig 5). During the experiment conducted on 6-July, the HMW STP addition significantly (p<0.01) enhanced cellular content of OA, DTX1 and total PTX by 61, 76 and 72%, respectively (Fig 5). In a single case (13-June), the addition of all nutrients caused a significant decrease (45–63%; p<0.001) in total PTX content compared to the control (Fig 5). Contrastingly, the addition of all nutrients caused a significant increase (24–76%; p<0.05) in total PTX content during an experiment conducted on 6 July (Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 5. Okadaic acid (OA), dinophysistoxins 1 (DTX1) and total pectenotoxins (total PTX) as fg cell^-1 for nutrient amendment experiments conducted using Northport Bay bloom water during 2011.

Bars are means while error bars represent the SD of triplicate bottles. Asterisks indicate treatments that are significantly different from the unamended control. Abbreviations as in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.g005

Discussion

Prior to this study, the role of nutrient loading in the occurrence of Dinophysis blooms has been largely ignored and links between nutrient loading and DSP events have not been made. This four year field investigation documented two high density (>10⁶ cells L⁻¹), toxic Dinophysis acuminata blooms in two different New York estuaries, Meetinghouse Creek and Northport Bay. Highly significant multi-variate forward step-wise regression models demonstrated that D. acuminata abundances and cellular toxin content were both dependent upon concentrations of ammonium during blooms and ammonium consistently enhanced D. acuminata densities during experiments. Additionally, organic nitrogen compounds such as glutamine, and high molecular weight organic matter from sewage treatment plants increased the cellular toxicity of D. acuminata during experiments. Finally, densities of D. acuminata during experiments were inversely correlated with densities of multiple plankton groups suggesting that trophic interactions and/or competition also influenced D. acuminata abundance. Collectively, this work provides new insight regarding the role of nutrient loading in the occurrence of HABs caused by this mixotrophic alga.

The effects of nutrients on Dinophysis blooms

Dinophysis acuminata is a mixotrophic dinoflagellate and, to date, the role of nutrients in the occurrence of DSP events has received little attention [22]. There were multiple lines of evidence generated by this study, however, that demonstrated that nutrient loading promotes D. acuminata blooms. While nutrient levels within Northport Harbor were high before and after the onset of blooms, during blooms concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate were always lower, sometimes by more than five-fold, indicating there was a large nutrient demand during these events by D. acuminata and co-occurring algae (e.g. Prorocentrum spp, Skeletonema spp. and euglenoids). Both DIN:DIP and DIN:Si ratios during the peak of the bloom were lower than those found before and after the peak of the bloom, specifically evidencing a strong N demand during these Dinophysis blooms. The DIN:DIP only fell below the Redfield ratio (16:1) during the peak of the large (>10⁶) 2011 bloom, perhaps indicating a stronger N demand during that large bloom. During other periods, inorganic N:P ratios were close to Redfield (20.6 ± 2.5), while organic N:P were substantially above it (35.3 ± 3.85) suggesting that although autotrophs had an adequate balance of nutrients, heterotrophs had excess N relative to P. Finally, silicate levels were high and DIN:Si and DON:Si were always below 1 indicating that diatoms were unlikely to have been limited by the supply of silicon during this study [60–62].

During this investigation the initiation of D. acuminata blooms occurred during late spring and early summer, a period of warming temperatures and increasing salinities associated with lowered groundwater flow [63, 64]. Multi-variate regression models clearly captured this seasonality with D. acuminata abundances being significantly dependent on high temperatures and high salinity. The seasonality of these events also coincides with seasonally-influenced biogeochemical cycling of nutrients in estuaries. As blooms develop during late spring and early summer, flow rates of nitrate-enriched groundwater [65] become minimal [63, 64] while benthic fluxes of ammonium become maximal [66, 67]. Consistent with this idea, D. acuminata abundances and toxin content were positively dependent on ammonium concentrations while toxin content was negatively dependent on nitrate suggesting processes that enhance the production of recycled and regenerated ammonium, such as benthic fluxes, may promote D. acuminata blooms and enhance cellular toxin content. While a forward stepwise multiple regression model demonstrated that D. acuminata abundances were positively dependent on ammonium concentrations it additionally demonstrated positive and negative dependence on pennate diatoms and phytoflagellates, respectively, suggesting additional modes of nutrition may contribute toward these events, namely mixotrophy and specifically phagotrophy [6, 68]. Anderson, Burkholder (3) linked eutrophication to increases in mixotrophic (phagotrophic) HABs such as K. veneficum and Pfiesteria spp. Burkholder, Glibert (21) hypothesized that most HABs found in eutrophic environments are mixotrophs that are stimulated directly by nutrients, and/or indirectly by elevated nutrients that increase their algal prey. This may be the case for Dinophysis blooms observed during this study which occurred in eutrophied environments with significant point and non-point sources of nutrients that directly stimulate the growth of both this alga and others that may serve as prey. The speciation of nitrogen clearly influenced Dinophysis blooms in this system with abundances and toxin content being positively dependent on ammonium concentrations and toxin content negatively dependent on nitrate. Nitrate increased chlorophyll a levels in all but one experiment in which it was examined but rarely enhanced Dinophysis densities, indicating that in addition to being associated with lower cellular toxicity, nitrate loading depressed the relative abundance of Dinophysis within the phytoplankton community during blooms.

While relationships between Dinophysis acuminata abundances and nutrients in the field were modest, the experimental addition of nutrients to bloom water significantly and consistently (93% of experiments) yielded enhanced Dinophysis acuminata densities. Park, Kim (41) has reported D. acuminata growth rates of 0.95 d⁻¹ (a doubling time of 17.5 h) thus confirming that these enhancements (increases up to 650%) are not out of the realm of possibility. Similar to other HABs [3, 11, 14, 15, 18], D. acuminata densities were significantly enhanced by both inorganic (nitrate, ammonium, phosphate) and organic (glutamine, vitamins B₁ and B₁₂, high molecular weight sewage effluent) nutrients. The mode by which nutrients promote Dinophysis population growth may be either direct via nutrients used by Dinophysis or indirect via the increases in the abundance of Dinophysis’ prey. Significant correlations between Dinophysis and its primary prey, Mesodinium, have been observed in prior studies of these blooms [32]. Furthermore, during experiments, there were significant inverse correlations with multiple members of the planktonic community including those that can be considered both direct (Mesodinium) and indirect (autotrophic flagellates) prey of Dinophysis. Given the broad range of nutrients capable of enhancing the abundances of Dinophysis during this study, we hypothesize that many of these nutrients are stimulating the growth of various members of the microbial food web which benefit Dinophysis as direct (e.g. Mesodinium) or indirect (e.g. autotrophic flagellates) prey. The extent to which nutrients are directly or indirectly promoting Dinophysis should be assessed in future culture studies of this alga and/or microscopic examination of prey ingestion during blooms.

B-vitamins consistently yielded elevated densities of Dinophysis (e.g. 8 of 8 experiments in 2011). A recent survey of 47 strains of harmful algae found that 96% had an absolute requirement for vitamin B₁₂ and 80% had an absolute requirement for vitamin B₁ [14], and further studies have also noted the ability of picomolar levels of vitamin B₁₂ to promote the growth of some HABs in coastal systems [69, 70]. Presently, the vitamin requirements of Dinophysis spp. and Mesodinium spp. are unknown. Tang et al. [14] demonstrated that the cryptophyte, Rhodomonas salina, has absolute requirements for vitamin B₁ and B_12. Hence, like other nutrients, the ability of vitamins to enhance Dinophysis abundances could be direct or indirect if high vitamin levels promote the growth of cryptophytes, such as Teleaulax spp., which are consumed by Mesodinium spp, and, in turn, are consumed by Dinophysis.

The most consistent result (10 out of 11 experiments) in the present study was the statistically significant increase in Dinophysis acuminata densities caused by enrichment of ammonium. This finding was consistent with the dependence of Dinophysis abundances on ammonium within statistical models constructed during this study and with a study conducted in South Africa which found D. acuminata–dominated populations had a high affinity for ammonium [44]. Trainer, Moore (33) attributed the greater frequency of Dinophysis blooms in Washington, USA, to higher than average flow from the Fraser River during the summers of 2011 and 2012. While the authors linked the enhanced river flow to stratification that promoted those events [33], tributaries are significant point sources of nutrients to estuaries [71] and frontal boundaries, where Dinophysis blooms occurred (in WA), are often associated with high nutrient levels [72]. In addition to ammonium, other regenerated forms of N such as glutamine and high molecular weight sewage effluent enhanced Dinophysis densities in 4 of 5 experiments in 2011. Several other studies have demonstrated that dinoflagellates typically prefer regenerated N (ammonium) over new N (nitrate) [12, 59, 73, 74]. Collectively, this study demonstrates that regenerated nitrogen and ammonium, in particular, can promote D. acuminata blooms.

The effect of nutrients on Dinophysis toxicity

There have been very few lab or field studies on the environmental factors that influence Dinophysis toxicity. Both Tong et al. [75] and Nielsen et al. [53, 76] demonstrated that light intensity (15–300 μmol photons m⁻²s⁻¹) had no effect on toxin quotas for D. acuminata and D. acuta. Tong, Kulis (75), however, found that D. acuminata toxin production and toxin content varied during the growth cycle and toxin production required light. While the effect of light on Dinophysis toxicity was not the subject of the present study, during blooms in Northport Bay total cellular toxin quotas were positively dependent on ammonium and negatively dependent upon nitrate concentrations. In experiments conducted with D. acuminata bloom water, however, the addition of glutamine increased cellular toxin quotas of OA, DTX1 and total PTX in every experiment performed, while the addition of other nutrients had less consistent effects. A study investigating the effects of nutrients on okadaic acid congeners in two Dinophysis species came to contrasting conclusions [45]. While D. acuminata had higher OA concentrations under N-deficient conditions, levels were highest in D. acuta during nutrient sufficient conditions (+N+P) [45]. An investigation using cultures of the benthic DSP-producing dinoflagellate, Prorocentrum lima, found that either N- or P-limitation increased OA concentrations [77]. Consistent with the present study, however, Nagai, Suzuki (55) found that concentrations of PTX2, OA and DTX1 significantly increased in D. acuminata with the addition of organic substances (obtained from sonicating a M. rubra culture). Unlike other toxins associated with human health syndromes, such as saxitoxin and domoic acid, okadaic acid, dinophysistoxins and the co-ocurring pectenotoxins are large molecules (molecular weight >800) that are structurally rich in C that do not contain nitrogen. As such, it is possible the organic C from substances like glutamine and high molecular weight sewage treatment plant water may promote toxin production. Biosynthesis studies have demonstrated that okadaic acid is synthesized from acetate, glycine and glycolate [78]. In addition, Souto, Fernandez [79] found that in P. lima cultures, the addition of various amino acids increased OA per cell compared to control cultures thereby concluding that amino acids are likely involved in toxin biosynthesis. Given the regularity with which glutamine enhanced okadaic acid and other DSP toxin levels during nutrient enrichment experiments, we hypothesize this amino acid is involved in toxin synthesis as a precursor or cofactor in the synthesis reactions. Clearly, more research is needed to fully resolve the effects of nutrients on the toxicity of Dinophysis. Regardless, this study clearly demonstrates that glutamine enhances the toxin content of Dinophysis.

The influence of hydrodynamic processes on Dinophysis blooms

While this manuscript focuses on the effect of nutrients on Dinophysis, a series of studies have demonstrated that Dinophysis blooms can be related to various hydrodynamic processes such as cell accumulation forced by wind patterns and stratification [36, 80]. Our multi-variate regression model revealed the association of high Dinophysis densities with higher temperature and salinity, likely reflecting the seasonality of these blooms but not water column stratification or density gradients as this system is shallow, well-mixed, and never strongly stratified with respect to salinity or temperature [32]. Consistent with this, among bloom years (2010, 2011 and 2012) there were no significant differences in water column temperature, atmospheric temperature, or precipitation. While there was also no difference in wind intensity among years, wind direction was significantly different and may have influenced blooms [36]. Wind differences were most pronounced during April, two months prior to bloom peaks, with the largest bloom occurring in 2011 when winds were from the south rather than southwest. As such we hypothesize April wind patterns may have influenced the local fluxes of nutrients that supported subsequent blooms rather than the accumulation of cells as south winds would not have promoted an accumulation but rather a dispersal of cells into the bay.

Conclusions

During this multi-year study, DSP toxins and Dinophysis densities were promoted by and significantly correlated with multiple parameters including ammonium. Ammonium consistently enhanced abundances of Dinophysis while glutamine consistently enhanced its toxicity. Correlations between Dinophysis and multiple plankton groups during experiments suggested that the mechanism by which nutrients promote Dinophysis may be direct or indirect via effects on prey items. Controlled culture experiments are needed to further resolve the effects of nutrients on both the phototrophic and mixotrophic growth of Dinophysis acuminata. Regardless, this study demonstrates that enhanced nitrogen and organic matter loading in coastal zones are likely to promote both the growth and toxicity of Dinophysis blooms.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Whole chlorophyll a (μg L⁻¹) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

Values are means (standard deviation) of triplicate bottles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Mean growth rates (d⁻¹) calculated from whole chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

Values are means (standard deviation) of triplicate bottles. Asterisks indicate treatments that are significantly (p<0.05) different compared to the unamended control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Size fractionated (>20μm) chlorophyll a (μg L⁻¹) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

Values are means (standard deviation) of triplicate bottles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Mean growth rates (d⁻¹) calculated from >20μm chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

Values are means (standard deviation) of triplicate bottles. Asterisks indicate treatments that are significantly (p<0.05) different compared to the unamended control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124148.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We owe a great debt of gratitude to P. Houmere for the generous use of his facility, B. Gagliardi for boat assistance, R. Wallace, F. Koch, C. Lehmann and R. Hattenrath for logistical and field assistance. This is MERHAB contribution number 182.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TKHL CJG. Performed the experiments: TKHL JAG. Analyzed the data: TKHL HM MAM ZW BH SLM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CJG SLM. Wrote the paper: TKHL CJG.

References

1. Hallegraeff GM. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia. 1993;32(2):79–99.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Glibert PM, Anderson DM, Gentien P, Granéli E, Sellner KG. The global, complex phenomena of harmful algal blooms. Oceanography. 2005;18(2):136–47.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Anderson DM, Burkholder JM, Cochlan WP, Glibert PM, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, et al. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Examining linkages from selected coastal regions of the United States. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):39–53. pmid:19956363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM. Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2012;4:143–76. pmid:22457972
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Reguera B, Riobó P, Rodríguez F, Díaz P, Pizarro G, Paz B, et al. Dinophysis Toxins: Causative Organisms, Distribution and Fate in Shellfish. Marine Drugs. 2014;12(1):394–461. pmid:24447996
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Koukaras K, Nikolaidis G. Dinophysis blooms in Greek coastal waters (Thermaikos Gulf, NW Aegean Sea). J Plankton Res. 2004;26(4):445–57.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Jin D, Hoagland P. The value of harmful algal bloom predictions to the nearshore commercial shellfish fishery in the Gulf of Maine. Harmful Algae. 2008;7(6):772–81.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Jin D, Thunberg E, Hoagland P. Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2008;51(5):420–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Van Dolah FM. Marine algal toxins: Origins, health effects, and their increased occurrence. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000;108:133–41. pmid:10698729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries. 2002;25(4):704–26.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, et al. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):3–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Hattenrath TK, Anderson DM, Gobler CJ. The influence of anthropogenic nitrogen loading and meteorological conditions on the dynamics and toxicity of Alexandrium fundyense blooms in a New York (USA) estuary. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(4):402–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Xu J, Ho AYT, He L, Yin K, Hung C, Choi N, et al. Effects of inorganic and organic nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and toxicity of two Alexandrium species from Hong Kong. Harmful Algae. 2012;16:89–97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Tang YZ, Koch F, Gobler CJ. Most harmful algal bloom species are vitamin B₁ and B₁₂ auxotrophs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(48):20756–61. pmid:21068377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Mulholland MR, Gobler CJ, Lee C. Peptide hydrolysis, amino acid oxidation, and nitrogen uptake in communities seasonally dominated by Aureococcus anophagefferens. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002;47(4):1094–108.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Dyhrman ST, Anderson DM. Urease activity in cultures and field populations of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(2):647–55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Glibert PM, Harrison J, Heil C, Seitzinger S. Escalating worldwide use of urea–a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication. Biogeochemistry. 2006;77(3):441–63.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Glibert PM, Legrand C. The diverse nutrient strategies of harmful algae: focus on osmotrophy. In: Graneli E, Turner JT, editors. Ecology of Harmful Algae, Ecological Studies. 189. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 163–75.
19. Stoecker DK, Tillmann U, Graneli E. Phagotrophy in harmful algae. In: Graneli E, Turner JT, editors. Ecology of harmful algae, ecological studies. 189. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 177–87.
20. Jeong HJ, Yoo Y, Park JY, Song JY, Kim ST, Lee SH, et al. Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;40(2):133–50.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Burkholder JM, Glibert PM, Skelton HM. Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):77–93.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Reguera B, Velo-Suarez L, Raine R, Park MG. Harmful Dinophysis species: A review. Harmful Algae. 2012;14:87–106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Gayoso AM, Dover S, Morton S, Busman M, Moeller P, Fulco VK, et al. Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning associated with Prorocentrum lima (Dinophyceae) in Patagonian Gulfs (Argentina). Journal of Shellfish Research. 2002;21(2):461–3.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Maranda L, Corwin S, Dover S, Morton SL. Prorocentrum lima (Dinophyceae) in northeastern USA coastal waters—II: Toxin load in the epibiota and in shellfish. Harmful Algae. 2007;6(5):632–41.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Lee J-S, Igarashi T, Fraga S, Dahl E, Hovgaard P, Yasumoto T. Determination of diarrhetic shellfish toxins in various dinoflagellate species. J Appl Phycol. 1989;1(2):147–52.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Fux E, Smith JL, Tong M, Guzman L, Anderson DM. Toxin profiles of five geographical isolates of Dinophysis spp. from North and South America. Toxicon. 2011;57(2):275–87. pmid:21147146
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Burgess V, Shaw G. Pectenotoxins—an issue for public health—A review of their comparative toxicology and metabolism. Environment International. 2001;27(4):275–83. pmid:11686638
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Tango P, Butler W, Lacouture R, Goshorn D, Magnien R, Michael B, et al. An unprecedented bloom of Dinophysis acuminata in Chesapeake Bay. In: Steidinger KA, Landsberg JH, Tomas CR, Vargo GA, editors. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission: FIO and ICO UNESCO; 2004. p. 358–60.
29. Todd ECD. Seafood-associated diseases and control in Canada. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties. 1997;16(2):661–72.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Subba Rao DV, Pan Y, Zitko V, Bugden G, Mackeigan K. Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) associated with a subsurface bloom of Dinophysis norvegica in Bedford basin, Eastern Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1993;97(2):117–26.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Quilliam MA, Gilgan MW, Pleasance S, deFreitas ASW, Douglas D, Fritz L, et al., editors. Confirmation of an incident of diarhettic shellfish poisoning in eastern Canada. Proc 2nd Canadian Workshop on Harmful Marine Algae; 1991: Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1799.
32. Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, Marcoval MA, Berry DL, Fire S, Wang Z, Morton SL, et al. The emergence of Dinophysis acuminata blooms and DSP toxins in shellfish in New York waters. Harmful Algae. 2013;26(0):33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.03.005.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Trainer V, Moore L, Bill B, Adams N, Harrington N, Borchert J, et al. Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxins and Other Lipophilic Toxins of Human Health Concern in Washington State. Marine Drugs. 2013;11(6):1815–35. pmid:23760013
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Deeds JR, Wiles K, Heideman GB, White KD, Abraham A. First US report of shellfish harvesting closures due to confirmed okadaic acid in Texas Gulf coast oysters. Toxicon. 2010;55(6):1138–46. pmid:20060850
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Campbell L, Olson RJ, Sosik HM, Abraham A, Henrichs DW, Hyatt CJ, et al. First harmful Dinophysis (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) bloom in the U.S. is revealed by automated imaging flow cytometry. J Phycol. 2010;46(1):66–75.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Swanson KM, Flewelling LJ, Byrd M, Nunez A, Villareal TA. The 2008 Texas Dinophysis ovum bloom: Distribution and toxicity. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(2):190–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Freudenthal A, Jijina JL. Potential hazards of Dinophysis to consumers and shellfisheries. Journal of Shellfish Research. 1988;7(1):157–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Horner RA, Garrison DL, Plumley FG. Harmful algal blooms and red tide problems on the U. S. west coast. Limnol Oceanogr. 1997;42(5):1076–88. pmid:9149065
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Dickey RW, Fryxell GA, Granade HR, Roelke D. Detection of the marine toxins okadaic acid and domoic acid in shellfish and phytoplankton in the Gulf of Mexico. Toxicon. 1992;30(3):355–9. pmid:1529467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Hansen PJ, Nielsen LT, Johnson M, Berge T, Flynn KR. Acquired phototrophy in Mesodinium and Dinophysis – A review of cellular organization, prey selectivity, nutrient uptake and bioenergetics. Harmful Algae. 2013;28:126–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.06.004.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Park MG, Kim S, Kim HS, Myung G, Kang YG, Yih W. First successful culture of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2006;45(2):101–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Delmas D, Herbland A, Maestrini SY. Environmental conditions which lead to increase in cell density of the toxic dinoflagellates Dinophysis spp. in nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor waters of the French Atlantic coast. Marine ecology progress series. 1992;89(1):53–61.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Giacobbe MG, Oliva F, Laferla R, Puglisi A, Crisafi E, Maimone G. Potentially toxic dinoflagellates in mediterranean waters (Sicily) and related hydrobiological conditions. Aquat Microb Ecol. 1995;9(1):63–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Seeyave S, Probyn TA, Pitcher GC, Lucas MI, Purdie DA. Nitrogen nutrition in assemblages dominated by Pseudo-nitzschia spp., Alexandrium catenella and Dinophysis acuminata off the west coast of South Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2009;379:91–107.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Johansson N, Graneli E, Yasumoto T, Carlsson P, Legrand C, editors. Toxin production by Dinophysis acuminata and D. acuta cells grown under nutrient sufficient and deficient conditions. the seventh international conference on toxic phytoplankton; 1996; Sendai, Japan: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.
46. Jones MN. Nitrate reduction by shaking with cadmium—alternative to cadmium columns. Water Research. 1984;18(5):643–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1984.
48. Valderrama JC. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and phosphorus in natural waters. Mar Chem. 1981;10:109–22.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Welschmeyer NA. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in the presence of chlorophyll-b and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr. 1994;39(8):1985–92.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Gerssen A, Mulder PPJ, McElhinney MA, de Boer J. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of marine lipophilic toxins under alkaline conditions. Journal of Chromatography A. 2009;1216(9):1421–30. pmid:19162270
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Suzuki T, Beuzenberg V, Mackenzie L, Quilliam MA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of spiroketal stereoisomers of pectenotoxins and the analysis of novel pectenotoxin isomers in the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta from New Zealand. Journal of Chromatography A. 2003;992(1–2):141–50. pmid:12735476
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Suzuki T, Quilliam MA. LC-MS/MS Analysis of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) Toxins, Okadaic Acid and Dinophysistoxin Analogues, and Other Lipophilic Toxins. Analytical Sciences. 2011;27(6):571–84. pmid:21666353
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Nielsen LT, Krock B, Hansen PJ. Production and excretion of okadaic acid, pectenotoxin-2 and a novel dinophysistoxin from the DSP-causing marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta—Effects of light, food availability and growth phase. Harmful Algae. 2013;23:34–45.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Smith JL, Tong MM, Fux E, Anderson DM. Toxin production, retention, and extracellular release by Dinophysis acuminata during extended stationary phase and culture decline. Harmful Algae. 2012;19:125–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Nagai S, Suzuki T, Nishikawa T, Kamiyama T. Differences in the production and excretion kinetics of okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin-1, and pectenotoxin-2 between cultures of Dinophysis acuminata and Dinophysis fortii isolated from western Japan. J Phycol. 2011;47(6):1326–37.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Gobler CJ, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA. Cycling of colloidal organic carbon and nitrogen during an estuarine phytoplankton bloom. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(6):2314–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Gobler CJ, Deonarine S, Leigh-Bell J, Gastrich MD, Anderson OR, Wilhelm SW. Ecology of phytoplankton communities dominated by Aureococcus anophagefferens: the role of viruses, nutrients, and microzooplankton grazing. Harmful Algae. 2004;3(4):471–83.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Koch F, Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, Goleski JA, Sañudo-Wilhelmy S, Fisher NS, Gobler CJ. Vitamin B₁ and B₁₂ uptake and cycling by plankton communities in coastal ecosystems. Frontiers in microbiology. 2012;3:363. pmid:23091470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Gobler CJ, Burson A, Koch F, Tang YZ, Mulholland MR. The role of nitrogenous nutrients in the occurrence of harmful algal blooms caused by Cochlodinium polykrikoides in New York estuaries (USA). Harmful Algae. 2012;17:64–74.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Gobler CJ, Buck NJ, Sieracki ME, Sañudo-Wilhelmy SA. Nitrogen and silicon limitation of phytoplankton communities across an urban estuary: The East River-Long Island Sound system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006;68(1):127–38.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Brzezinski MA. The Si:C:N ratio of marine diatoms: interspecific variability and the effect of some environmental variables. J Phycol. 1985;21(3):347–57.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Smayda TJ. Novel and nuisance phytoplankton blooms in the sea: evidence for a global epidemic. In: Graneli E, Sundstrom B, Edler L, Anderson D, editors. Toxic marine phytoplankton. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.; 1990. p. 29–40.
63. Gobler CJ, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA. Temporal variability of groundwater seepage and brown tide blooms in a Long Island embayment. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2001;217:299–309.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Steenhuis TS, Jackson CD, Kung SKG, Brutsaert WH. Measurement of groundwater recharge on Eastern Long Island, NY, USA. Journal of Hydrology. 1985;79:145–69.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Young C, Kroeger KD, Hanson G. Limited denitrification in glacial deposit aquifers having thick unsaturated zones (Long Island, USA). Hydrogeol J. 2013;21(8):1773–86.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Boynton W, Garber J, Summers R, Kemp W. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries. Estuaries. 1995;18(1):285–314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
67. Boynton W, Kemp WM. Nutrient regeneration and oxygen consumption by sediments along an estuarine salinity gradient. Marine ecology progress series. 1985;23(1):45–55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
68. Davidson K, Gowen RJ, Tett P, Bresnan E, Harrison PJ, McKinney A, et al. Harmful algal blooms: How strong is the evidence that nutrient ratios and forms influence their occurrence? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2012;115(0):399–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.09.019.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
69. Koch F, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA, Fisher NS, Gobler CJ. Effect of vitamins B₁ and B₁₂ on bloom dynamics of the harmful brown tide alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens (Pelagophyceae). Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58(5):1761–74.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
70. Koch F, Burson A, Tang YZ, Collier JL, Fisher NS, Sañudo-Wilhelmy S, et al. Alteration of plankton communities and biogeochemical cycles by harmful Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) blooms. Harmful Algae. 2014;33(0):41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2014.01.003.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
71. Bricker SB, Longstaf B, Dennison W, Jones A, Boicourt K, Wicks C, et al. Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: A decade of change. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):21–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
72. Townsend DW, Bennett SL, Thomas MA. Diel vertical distributions of the red tide dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense in the Gulf of Maine. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2005;52(19):2593–602.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
73. Dortch Q. The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton. Marine ecology progress series. 1990;61(1):183–201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
74. Collos Y, Vaquer A, Laabir M, Abadie E, Laugier T, Pastoureaud A, et al. Contribution of several nitrogen sources to growth of Alexandrium catenella during blooms in Thau lagoon, southern France. Harmful Algae. 2007;6(6):781–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
75. Tong M, Kulis DM, Fux E, Smith JL, Hess P, Zhou Q, et al. The effects of growth phase and light intensity on toxin production by Dinophysis acuminata from the northeastern United States. Harmful Algae. 2011;10(3):254–64.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
76. Nielsen LT, Krock B, Hansen PJ. Effects of light and food availability on toxin production, growth and photosynthesis in Dinophysis acuminata. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2012;471:37–50.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
77. Vanucci S, Guerrini F, Milandri A, Pistocchi R. Effects of different levels of N- and P-deficiency on cell yield, okadaic acid, DTX-1, protein and carbohydrate dynamics in the benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(6):590–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
78. Kalaitzis JA, Chau R, Kohli GS, Murray SA, Neilan BA. Biosynthesis of toxic naturally-occurring seafood contaminants. Toxicon. 2010;56(2):244–58. pmid:19761784
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
79. Souto ML, Fernandez DJ, Norte M, Fernandez ML, Martinez A. Influence of amino acids on okadaic acid production. Toxicon. 2001;39(5):659–64. pmid:11072044
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
80. Sjöqvist CO, Lindholm TJ. Natural Co-occurrence of Dinophysis acuminata (Dinoflagellata) and Mesodinium rubrum (Ciliophora) in Thin Layers in a Coastal Inlet. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2011;58(4):365–72. pmid:21569163
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Hallegraeff GM. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia. 1993;32(2):79–99.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Glibert PM, Anderson DM, Gentien P, Granéli E, Sellner KG. The global, complex phenomena of harmful algal blooms. Oceanography. 2005;18(2):136–47.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Anderson DM, Burkholder JM, Cochlan WP, Glibert PM, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, et al. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Examining linkages from selected coastal regions of the United States. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):39–53. pmid:19956363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] PubMed/NCBI

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM. Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2012;4:143–76. pmid:22457972
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Reguera B, Riobó P, Rodríguez F, Díaz P, Pizarro G, Paz B, et al. Dinophysis Toxins: Causative Organisms, Distribution and Fate in Shellfish. Marine Drugs. 2014;12(1):394–461. pmid:24447996
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] PubMed/NCBI

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Koukaras K, Nikolaidis G. Dinophysis blooms in Greek coastal waters (Thermaikos Gulf, NW Aegean Sea). J Plankton Res. 2004;26(4):445–57.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Jin D, Hoagland P. The value of harmful algal bloom predictions to the nearshore commercial shellfish fishery in the Gulf of Maine. Harmful Algae. 2008;7(6):772–81.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Jin D, Thunberg E, Hoagland P. Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2008;51(5):420–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Van Dolah FM. Marine algal toxins: Origins, health effects, and their increased occurrence. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000;108:133–41. pmid:10698729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries. 2002;25(4):704–26.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, et al. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):3–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hattenrath TK, Anderson DM, Gobler CJ. The influence of anthropogenic nitrogen loading and meteorological conditions on the dynamics and toxicity of Alexandrium fundyense blooms in a New York (USA) estuary. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(4):402–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Xu J, Ho AYT, He L, Yin K, Hung C, Choi N, et al. Effects of inorganic and organic nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and toxicity of two Alexandrium species from Hong Kong. Harmful Algae. 2012;16:89–97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Tang YZ, Koch F, Gobler CJ. Most harmful algal bloom species are vitamin B₁ and B₁₂ auxotrophs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(48):20756–61. pmid:21068377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Mulholland MR, Gobler CJ, Lee C. Peptide hydrolysis, amino acid oxidation, and nitrogen uptake in communities seasonally dominated by Aureococcus anophagefferens. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002;47(4):1094–108.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Dyhrman ST, Anderson DM. Urease activity in cultures and field populations of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(2):647–55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Glibert PM, Harrison J, Heil C, Seitzinger S. Escalating worldwide use of urea–a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication. Biogeochemistry. 2006;77(3):441–63.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Glibert PM, Legrand C. The diverse nutrient strategies of harmful algae: focus on osmotrophy. In: Graneli E, Turner JT, editors. Ecology of Harmful Algae, Ecological Studies. 189. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 163–75.

[ref19] 19. Stoecker DK, Tillmann U, Graneli E. Phagotrophy in harmful algae. In: Graneli E, Turner JT, editors. Ecology of harmful algae, ecological studies. 189. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 177–87.

[ref20] 20. Jeong HJ, Yoo Y, Park JY, Song JY, Kim ST, Lee SH, et al. Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;40(2):133–50.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Burkholder JM, Glibert PM, Skelton HM. Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):77–93.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Reguera B, Velo-Suarez L, Raine R, Park MG. Harmful Dinophysis species: A review. Harmful Algae. 2012;14:87–106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Gayoso AM, Dover S, Morton S, Busman M, Moeller P, Fulco VK, et al. Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning associated with Prorocentrum lima (Dinophyceae) in Patagonian Gulfs (Argentina). Journal of Shellfish Research. 2002;21(2):461–3.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Maranda L, Corwin S, Dover S, Morton SL. Prorocentrum lima (Dinophyceae) in northeastern USA coastal waters—II: Toxin load in the epibiota and in shellfish. Harmful Algae. 2007;6(5):632–41.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Lee J-S, Igarashi T, Fraga S, Dahl E, Hovgaard P, Yasumoto T. Determination of diarrhetic shellfish toxins in various dinoflagellate species. J Appl Phycol. 1989;1(2):147–52.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Fux E, Smith JL, Tong M, Guzman L, Anderson DM. Toxin profiles of five geographical isolates of Dinophysis spp. from North and South America. Toxicon. 2011;57(2):275–87. pmid:21147146
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Burgess V, Shaw G. Pectenotoxins—an issue for public health—A review of their comparative toxicology and metabolism. Environment International. 2001;27(4):275–83. pmid:11686638
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Tango P, Butler W, Lacouture R, Goshorn D, Magnien R, Michael B, et al. An unprecedented bloom of Dinophysis acuminata in Chesapeake Bay. In: Steidinger KA, Landsberg JH, Tomas CR, Vargo GA, editors. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission: FIO and ICO UNESCO; 2004. p. 358–60.

[ref29] 29. Todd ECD. Seafood-associated diseases and control in Canada. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties. 1997;16(2):661–72.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Subba Rao DV, Pan Y, Zitko V, Bugden G, Mackeigan K. Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) associated with a subsurface bloom of Dinophysis norvegica in Bedford basin, Eastern Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1993;97(2):117–26.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Quilliam MA, Gilgan MW, Pleasance S, deFreitas ASW, Douglas D, Fritz L, et al., editors. Confirmation of an incident of diarhettic shellfish poisoning in eastern Canada. Proc 2nd Canadian Workshop on Harmful Marine Algae; 1991: Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1799.

[ref32] 32. Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, Marcoval MA, Berry DL, Fire S, Wang Z, Morton SL, et al. The emergence of Dinophysis acuminata blooms and DSP toxins in shellfish in New York waters. Harmful Algae. 2013;26(0):33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.03.005.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Trainer V, Moore L, Bill B, Adams N, Harrington N, Borchert J, et al. Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxins and Other Lipophilic Toxins of Human Health Concern in Washington State. Marine Drugs. 2013;11(6):1815–35. pmid:23760013
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Deeds JR, Wiles K, Heideman GB, White KD, Abraham A. First US report of shellfish harvesting closures due to confirmed okadaic acid in Texas Gulf coast oysters. Toxicon. 2010;55(6):1138–46. pmid:20060850
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Campbell L, Olson RJ, Sosik HM, Abraham A, Henrichs DW, Hyatt CJ, et al. First harmful Dinophysis (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) bloom in the U.S. is revealed by automated imaging flow cytometry. J Phycol. 2010;46(1):66–75.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Swanson KM, Flewelling LJ, Byrd M, Nunez A, Villareal TA. The 2008 Texas Dinophysis ovum bloom: Distribution and toxicity. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(2):190–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Freudenthal A, Jijina JL. Potential hazards of Dinophysis to consumers and shellfisheries. Journal of Shellfish Research. 1988;7(1):157–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Horner RA, Garrison DL, Plumley FG. Harmful algal blooms and red tide problems on the U. S. west coast. Limnol Oceanogr. 1997;42(5):1076–88. pmid:9149065
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Dickey RW, Fryxell GA, Granade HR, Roelke D. Detection of the marine toxins okadaic acid and domoic acid in shellfish and phytoplankton in the Gulf of Mexico. Toxicon. 1992;30(3):355–9. pmid:1529467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Hansen PJ, Nielsen LT, Johnson M, Berge T, Flynn KR. Acquired phototrophy in Mesodinium and Dinophysis – A review of cellular organization, prey selectivity, nutrient uptake and bioenergetics. Harmful Algae. 2013;28:126–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.06.004.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Park MG, Kim S, Kim HS, Myung G, Kang YG, Yih W. First successful culture of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2006;45(2):101–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Delmas D, Herbland A, Maestrini SY. Environmental conditions which lead to increase in cell density of the toxic dinoflagellates Dinophysis spp. in nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor waters of the French Atlantic coast. Marine ecology progress series. 1992;89(1):53–61.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Giacobbe MG, Oliva F, Laferla R, Puglisi A, Crisafi E, Maimone G. Potentially toxic dinoflagellates in mediterranean waters (Sicily) and related hydrobiological conditions. Aquat Microb Ecol. 1995;9(1):63–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Seeyave S, Probyn TA, Pitcher GC, Lucas MI, Purdie DA. Nitrogen nutrition in assemblages dominated by Pseudo-nitzschia spp., Alexandrium catenella and Dinophysis acuminata off the west coast of South Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2009;379:91–107.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Johansson N, Graneli E, Yasumoto T, Carlsson P, Legrand C, editors. Toxin production by Dinophysis acuminata and D. acuta cells grown under nutrient sufficient and deficient conditions. the seventh international conference on toxic phytoplankton; 1996; Sendai, Japan: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.

[ref46] 46. Jones MN. Nitrate reduction by shaking with cadmium—alternative to cadmium columns. Water Research. 1984;18(5):643–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1984.

[ref48] 48. Valderrama JC. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and phosphorus in natural waters. Mar Chem. 1981;10:109–22.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Welschmeyer NA. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in the presence of chlorophyll-b and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr. 1994;39(8):1985–92.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Gerssen A, Mulder PPJ, McElhinney MA, de Boer J. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of marine lipophilic toxins under alkaline conditions. Journal of Chromatography A. 2009;1216(9):1421–30. pmid:19162270
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Suzuki T, Beuzenberg V, Mackenzie L, Quilliam MA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of spiroketal stereoisomers of pectenotoxins and the analysis of novel pectenotoxin isomers in the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta from New Zealand. Journal of Chromatography A. 2003;992(1–2):141–50. pmid:12735476
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Suzuki T, Quilliam MA. LC-MS/MS Analysis of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) Toxins, Okadaic Acid and Dinophysistoxin Analogues, and Other Lipophilic Toxins. Analytical Sciences. 2011;27(6):571–84. pmid:21666353
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Nielsen LT, Krock B, Hansen PJ. Production and excretion of okadaic acid, pectenotoxin-2 and a novel dinophysistoxin from the DSP-causing marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta—Effects of light, food availability and growth phase. Harmful Algae. 2013;23:34–45.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Smith JL, Tong MM, Fux E, Anderson DM. Toxin production, retention, and extracellular release by Dinophysis acuminata during extended stationary phase and culture decline. Harmful Algae. 2012;19:125–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Nagai S, Suzuki T, Nishikawa T, Kamiyama T. Differences in the production and excretion kinetics of okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin-1, and pectenotoxin-2 between cultures of Dinophysis acuminata and Dinophysis fortii isolated from western Japan. J Phycol. 2011;47(6):1326–37.
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Gobler CJ, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA. Cycling of colloidal organic carbon and nitrogen during an estuarine phytoplankton bloom. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(6):2314–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Gobler CJ, Deonarine S, Leigh-Bell J, Gastrich MD, Anderson OR, Wilhelm SW. Ecology of phytoplankton communities dominated by Aureococcus anophagefferens: the role of viruses, nutrients, and microzooplankton grazing. Harmful Algae. 2004;3(4):471–83.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Koch F, Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, Goleski JA, Sañudo-Wilhelmy S, Fisher NS, Gobler CJ. Vitamin B₁ and B₁₂ uptake and cycling by plankton communities in coastal ecosystems. Frontiers in microbiology. 2012;3:363. pmid:23091470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Gobler CJ, Burson A, Koch F, Tang YZ, Mulholland MR. The role of nitrogenous nutrients in the occurrence of harmful algal blooms caused by Cochlodinium polykrikoides in New York estuaries (USA). Harmful Algae. 2012;17:64–74.
View Article
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Gobler CJ, Buck NJ, Sieracki ME, Sañudo-Wilhelmy SA. Nitrogen and silicon limitation of phytoplankton communities across an urban estuary: The East River-Long Island Sound system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006;68(1):127–38.
View Article
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Brzezinski MA. The Si:C:N ratio of marine diatoms: interspecific variability and the effect of some environmental variables. J Phycol. 1985;21(3):347–57.
View Article
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Smayda TJ. Novel and nuisance phytoplankton blooms in the sea: evidence for a global epidemic. In: Graneli E, Sundstrom B, Edler L, Anderson D, editors. Toxic marine phytoplankton. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.; 1990. p. 29–40.

[ref63] 63. Gobler CJ, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA. Temporal variability of groundwater seepage and brown tide blooms in a Long Island embayment. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2001;217:299–309.
View Article
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Steenhuis TS, Jackson CD, Kung SKG, Brutsaert WH. Measurement of groundwater recharge on Eastern Long Island, NY, USA. Journal of Hydrology. 1985;79:145–69.
View Article
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Young C, Kroeger KD, Hanson G. Limited denitrification in glacial deposit aquifers having thick unsaturated zones (Long Island, USA). Hydrogeol J. 2013;21(8):1773–86.
View Article
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Boynton W, Garber J, Summers R, Kemp W. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries. Estuaries. 1995;18(1):285–314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Boynton W, Kemp WM. Nutrient regeneration and oxygen consumption by sediments along an estuarine salinity gradient. Marine ecology progress series. 1985;23(1):45–55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Davidson K, Gowen RJ, Tett P, Bresnan E, Harrison PJ, McKinney A, et al. Harmful algal blooms: How strong is the evidence that nutrient ratios and forms influence their occurrence? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2012;115(0):399–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.09.019.
View Article
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Koch F, Sanudo-Wilhelmy SA, Fisher NS, Gobler CJ. Effect of vitamins B₁ and B₁₂ on bloom dynamics of the harmful brown tide alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens (Pelagophyceae). Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58(5):1761–74.
View Article
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Koch F, Burson A, Tang YZ, Collier JL, Fisher NS, Sañudo-Wilhelmy S, et al. Alteration of plankton communities and biogeochemical cycles by harmful Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) blooms. Harmful Algae. 2014;33(0):41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2014.01.003.
View Article
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Bricker SB, Longstaf B, Dennison W, Jones A, Boicourt K, Wicks C, et al. Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: A decade of change. Harmful Algae. 2008;8(1):21–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[213] View Article

[214] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Townsend DW, Bennett SL, Thomas MA. Diel vertical distributions of the red tide dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense in the Gulf of Maine. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2005;52(19):2593–602.
View Article
Google Scholar

[216] View Article

[217] Google Scholar

[ref73] 73. Dortch Q. The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton. Marine ecology progress series. 1990;61(1):183–201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] Google Scholar

[ref74] 74. Collos Y, Vaquer A, Laabir M, Abadie E, Laugier T, Pastoureaud A, et al. Contribution of several nitrogen sources to growth of Alexandrium catenella during blooms in Thau lagoon, southern France. Harmful Algae. 2007;6(6):781–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] Google Scholar

[ref75] 75. Tong M, Kulis DM, Fux E, Smith JL, Hess P, Zhou Q, et al. The effects of growth phase and light intensity on toxin production by Dinophysis acuminata from the northeastern United States. Harmful Algae. 2011;10(3):254–64.
View Article
Google Scholar

[225] View Article

[226] Google Scholar

[ref76] 76. Nielsen LT, Krock B, Hansen PJ. Effects of light and food availability on toxin production, growth and photosynthesis in Dinophysis acuminata. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2012;471:37–50.
View Article
Google Scholar

[228] View Article

[229] Google Scholar

[ref77] 77. Vanucci S, Guerrini F, Milandri A, Pistocchi R. Effects of different levels of N- and P-deficiency on cell yield, okadaic acid, DTX-1, protein and carbohydrate dynamics in the benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. Harmful Algae. 2010;9(6):590–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[231] View Article

[232] Google Scholar

[ref78] 78. Kalaitzis JA, Chau R, Kohli GS, Murray SA, Neilan BA. Biosynthesis of toxic naturally-occurring seafood contaminants. Toxicon. 2010;56(2):244–58. pmid:19761784
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref79] 79. Souto ML, Fernandez DJ, Norte M, Fernandez ML, Martinez A. Influence of amino acids on okadaic acid production. Toxicon. 2001;39(5):659–64. pmid:11072044
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] PubMed/NCBI

[240] Google Scholar

[ref80] 80. Sjöqvist CO, Lindholm TJ. Natural Co-occurrence of Dinophysis acuminata (Dinoflagellata) and Mesodinium rubrum (Ciliophora) in Thin Layers in a Coastal Inlet. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2011;58(4):365–72. pmid:21569163
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[242] View Article

[243] PubMed/NCBI

[244] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Field sampling

Analysis of toxins in phytoplankton concentrates

Nutrient amendment experiments

Statistical analyses

Results

Dynamics of Dinophysis, toxins, nutrients and meteorological conditions in New York estuaries

Nutrient amendment experiments

Discussion

The effects of nutrients on Dinophysis blooms

The effect of nutrients on Dinophysis toxicity

The influence of hydrodynamic processes on Dinophysis blooms

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Whole chlorophyll a (μg L−1) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S2 Table. Mean growth rates (d−1) calculated from whole chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S3 Table. Size fractionated (>20μm) chlorophyll a (μg L−1) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S4 Table. Mean growth rates (d−1) calculated from >20μm chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

S1 Table. Whole chlorophyll a (μg L⁻¹) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S2 Table. Mean growth rates (d⁻¹) calculated from whole chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S3 Table. Size fractionated (>20μm) chlorophyll a (μg L⁻¹) concentrations from nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.

S4 Table. Mean growth rates (d⁻¹) calculated from >20μm chlorophyll a of nutrient amendment experiments conducted during 2008, 2010 and 2011 using water collected from Northport Bay, New York.