Figures
Abstract
High-density and well-aligned ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone arrays were synthesized on fluorine-doped tin oxide glass substrate using a facile and cost-effective two-step approach. In this synthetic process, the ZnO nanocones act as the template and provide Zn2+ ions for the ZnS shell formation. The photoluminescence spectrum indicates remarkably enhanced luminescence intensity and a small redshift in the UV region, which can be associated with the strain caused by the lattice mismatch between ZnO and ZnS. The obtained diffuse reflectance spectra show that the nanocone-based heterostructure reduces the light reflection in a broad spectral range and is much more effective than the bare ZnO nanocone and nanorod structures. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on the heterostructure ZnO–ZnS nanocones are assembled, and high conversion efficiency (η) of approximately 4.07% is obtained. The η improvement can be attributed primarily to the morphology effect of ZnO nanocones on light-trapping and effectively passivating the interface surface recombination sites of ZnO nanocones by coating with a ZnS shell layer.
Citation: Rouhi J, Mamat MH, Ooi CHR, Mahmud S, Mahmood MR (2015) High-Performance Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Morphology-Controllable Synthesis of ZnO–ZnS Heterostructure Nanocone Photoanodes. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123433
Academic Editor: Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Institute for Materials Science, GERMANY
Received: December 13, 2014; Accepted: March 4, 2015; Published: April 13, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Rouhi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge that this work was supported by Long-Term Research Grant Scheme for Nanostructures, Nanomaterials and Devices for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production (600-RMI/LRGS 5/3 (3/2013)) grant, by the NANO-SciTech Centre in Universiti Teknologi MARA, and by the High Impact Research MoE Grant No. UM.C/625/1/HIR/MoE/CHAN/04 from the Ministry of Education Malaysia.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Zinc oxide nanostructures have attracted significant attention because of their desirable properties for various device applications [1–4]. ZnO nanomaterials show several advantages such as simple tailoring of the structures, high carrier mobility, ease of crystallization, and facile, as well as low-cost, large-scale production [5–7].
ZnO nanorod arrays, as antireflectors synthesized on Si wafers, could achieve a reflectance of less than 10% in broad band reflection suppression from 400 nm–1200 nm for a tapered nanorod array with average tip diameter of 10 nm. Effective antireflection coatings can enhance the conversion efficiency of Si solar cell through increased light coupling [8,9]. In the present study, a novel type of ZnO nanocone structures that can significantly reduce light reflection from the UV to near-infrared region is introduced. The ZnO nanocones with superior antireflection structure have great potential in light harvesting and electro-optical device applications [10].
Various 1-D nanostructure materials have been utilized as potential photoanode materials for of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) [11,12]. Among these materials, ZnO has been an ideal alternative to TiO2 because the electron mobility of ZnO has been proven to be higher than that of TiO2, which means lower charge recombination [13–15]. Furthermore, the well-aligned ZnO nanostructures can be simply synthesized and its morphology can be modified [16]. Some of techniques are easily scalable and appropriate for many substrates [17], which makes ZnO very attractive for fabricating DSSCs using low-cost solution methods. Although the conversion efficiency of the ZnO-based DSSCs is still lower than that of TiO2-based DSSCs, much effort has been focused to improve the performance of ZnO-based DSSCs [18–20].
Introducing a protective layer on the ZnO and simultaneous increasing the surface area by surface treatment should be a promising approach to improve the performance of DSSCs [21]. Numerous studies have focused on the type II band alignment of heterostructures because these structures can induce charge separation at the interface of two different materials and localize the electron and hole into different spatial regions of the nanostructure, thereby increasing the carrier lifetimes [22,23]. Cell efficiency can be changed depending on the type of shell material. ZnO nanowires coated with Al2O3 reduce power conversion efficiency because of the insulating barrier of Al2O3 shell layer that decreases injection efficiency [24]. Coating a semiconductor shell with a wide band gap has been proposed to be an effective method for suppressing surface recombination by passivating the surface defects. A Zn-based material may be a suitable shell layer on ZnO nanowires because it can help prevent the shell layer from acting as an insulating layer and causing a decrease in short-circuit current (JSC).
ZnO-based core–shell nanostructures, including ZnO–ZnSe, ZnO–ZnTe, ZnO–TiO2, and ZnO–ZnS have been investigated [25–28]. However, enhancing the overall efficiency of DSSCs remains a challenge. Traditional preparation techniques are disadvantageous because of special equipment or high temperature requirements, resulting in a high-cost and energy consuming synthesis process. Thus, simple, low-cost, and low-temperature techniques are necessary. In this study, cone-shaped ZnO–ZnS core–shell heterostructures were successfully fabricated using a facile two-step approach that combined electric field-assisted aqueous solution (EFAS) process and aqueous solution method. Moreover, the broad-band antireflective properties of self-assembled vertically aligned ZnO and ZnS-coated ZnO nanocones grown on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates are reported. DSSCs based on ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone arrays were assembled, and the effects of morphology and shelled structures on the efficiency of the DSSCs were investigated.
Materials and Methods
First, vertically aligned ZnO nanorod and nanocone arrays were grown on FTO substrates using the EFAS method [29]. A radiofrequency magnetron sputtering system was used to deposit a ZnO seed layer onto the films. Sputtering was performed at an incident power of 100 W for 1 h at 100°C using a ceramic ZnO target with 99.99% purity. A two-electrode setup was used in the electrochemical deposition of the ZnO nanostructures on the substrates. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate [Zn(NO3)2 6H2O] and hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4) were individually dissolved in deionized (DI) water at equal molar concentrations at room temperature. After mixing and uniform stirring, the aqueous solution (10 mM) was transferred into an electrochemical cell. The seed layer-coated ZnO/FTO film and platinum electrode were immersed into the aqueous solution as the cathode and anode, respectively.
Growth time and temperature were maintained at 40 min and 110°C, respectively. The FTO substrates containing the ZnO nanorods were then rinsed thoroughly with DI water and annealed at 250°C in air for 1 h to remove any organic molecules present on the surface of the nanorods. The as-grown ZnO nanocone arrays were then used as a template in the second growth process. Subsequently, 0.2 M thioacetamide aqueous solution was used as the sulfur source. The resulting solution was transferred into a beaker and then sulfidization was performed at 80°C growth temperature for 3 h in a conventional laboratory oven. After the growth process, the final products were repeatedly rinsed with DI water to remove possible impurities and then dried at room temperature.
Dye sensitization was performed by immersing the ZnO and ZnO–ZnS core–shell electrodes in the dye bath containing C218 (0.1 mM) dye in a solvent mixture of acetonitrile and butanol (1:1, v/v) for 2 h. Co-adsorbent 3α-7α-dihydroxy-5β-cholic acid (1 mM) was added in the C218 dye solution to reduce the dye aggregation on the ZnO and ZnO–ZnS core–shell films. The sensitized ZnO and ZnO–ZnS nanostructure electrodes were assembled with a platinum-coated FTO counter electrode, and the gap between the two electrodes was controlled by a 25 μm thick Surlyn film. A drop of electrolyte solution containing 0.06 M I2, 0.2 M NaI, 0.6 M 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide, and 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine in 3-methoxypropionitrile was introduced into the gap between the two electrodes. The active area of all the DSSCs was 0.25 cm2.
The samples were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, FEI Sirion 200) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips CM12, FEI, CO). X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku Ultima IV) was employed to determine the crystallinity of the ZnO nanostructures. The transmittance property was characterized using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Lambda 750). The photovoltaic characteristics of the DSSC devices were measured using a Solar Simulator (150 W simulator, Bunkoh-Keiki Co. Ltd.) under simulated solar light with a xenon lamp power supply (AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2). The dye absorbed amounts on ZnO-based photoelectrodes were determined by measuring the UV–vis absorption spectra of solutions containing dyes desorbed from the samples. The charge transfer and recombination processes were also investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) at frequencies ranging from 0.1 Hz to 0.1 MHz with oscillation potential amplitudes of 10 mV.
Results and Discussion
Fig 1 and 1B show the FESEM micrographs of the as-grown ZnO nanorod and nanocone arrays, respectively. Cone-shaped nanorods can be obtained by efficiently controlling the current density in EFAS process which is fully explained in our previous research [29]. At low current densities, the hydrothermal growth treatment of ZnO facilitated the growth of hexagonal-shaped nanorod arrays on the substrate. When current densities gradually increased, the growth rate of (0002) plane was much higher than that of non-polar surfaces. The fastest growing planes easily disappeared and finally resulted in the crystal shape build up only by slow growth rate facets. Consequently, the ZnO nanorods became smaller in diameter at the tip and had tapered ends.
FESEM images of (a) ZnO nanorods, (b) ZnO nanocons, (c) ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones, and (d) HRTEM image of the ZnO-ZnS core-shell structure.
Fig 1B clearly shows that the ZnO nanocones with sharp tips grew vertically on the FTO substrate. Further analysis indicates that the average length of the nanoneedles was approximately 2 μm, and the diameters were 15 and 150 nm at the tip and base, respectively. The FESEM micrograph of the nanocone arrays after the sulfidization of ZnO is presented in Fig 1C. The ZnS layer with a thickness of several tens of nanometers was distributed uniformly over the entire nanocone. Fig 1D illustrates a high-magnification TEM micrograph of a ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone, indicating that the ZnS shell was deposited directly in the radial direction from the surface of the ZnO core. From the enlarged image inserted in Fig 1D, the interplanar spacing of 0.31 nm corresponds to the [111] lattice plane of ZnS. Furthermore, the lattice spacing of 0.52 nm corresponds to the d-spacing of (0002) crystal planes, which confirms that the ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones are mainly oriented in the c-axis direction.
Fig 2 shows the XRD pattern of the ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone arrays. The diffraction peaks were identified and matched with the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure (ICSD 01-080-0074). The predominant (0002) peak with narrow width indicates well oriented along the normal direction of the substrate surface, which is consistent with the FESEM observation in Fig 1. An additional relatively broad and weak peak was observed at 2θ = 28.6°, which corresponds to the ZnS phase. The average nanocrystallite size of ZnS products is estimated to be about 2.7 nm by employing the well-known Debye–Scherrer formula which is close to excitonic Bohr radius of ZnS which is about 2.5 nm [30].
The photoluminescence (PL) was characterized at room temperature to investigate the optical properties of ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone arrays. Fig 3 shows the PL spectra of the shelled and bare ZnO nanocones (as the reference). Two emitting bands were observed in the ZnO nanocone arrays, including a narrow UV emission peak at 380 nm from the excitonic recombination associated with the near-band edge emission of ZnO [31,32] and a broad green emission centered around 580 nm that could be attributed to the Zn-vacancy, O-vacancy, and extrinsic impurities [33].
The inset shows the relative PL intensity ratio between the peak intensity of UV and DLE.
The ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones underwent a significant enhancement in the luminescence intensity and a small redshift in the UV region (Fig 3). The redshift in the PL spectrum may be ascribed to the strain caused by the lattice mismatch between ZnO and ZnS. Theoretically, the strain in the ZnO–ZnS interface is strong enough to reduce the total band gap of the system [34] (Fig 4). Furthermore, a thin layer of a wider band gap semiconductor on the ZnO nanocones surface passivated the surface electronic states of the cores, thereby enhancing the PL intensity of the UV emission region [35].
In addition, the redshift of the free exciton emission confirmed the presence of S atoms that were diffused into the ZnO surface to shape the isoelectronic centers. The S atoms filled up the oxygen vacancies on the ZnO nanocone surface, thereby resulting in the decreased number of oxygen vacancies and improved luminescence efficiency [36].
The intensity ratios of the green emission to the UV emission of the bare ZnO and shelled ZnO nanocones are shown in the inset of Fig 3. The ratio of green emission was obviously reduced in the ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanostructure. The reduced emission could be attributed to the reduction in oxygen vacancies in the ZnO core. Given that oxygen ions are formed during sulfidization and external diffusion of oxygen ions is difficult because of the large ionic radius, a considerable number of oxygen ions could be captured within the intermediate gap. Therefore, oxygen ions could fill the oxygen vacancies in the ZnO core, thereby decreasing the number of oxygen vacancies.
The results show that the UV emission intensity was significantly enhanced in the shelled ZnO nanocones. Therefore, the shelled ZnO nanocones are more applicable for fabrication of optoelectronic devices, such as UV light-emitting diodes and lasers.
The optical absorption and reflectance spectra of the samples are shown in Fig 5. The bare ZnO nanocones exhibited remarkably enhanced absorption compared with the nanorod arrays (Fig 5A), which are also significantly comparable with previous reports on ZnO nanowires and films [37]. These results indicate the antireflective and the absorption enhancement that can be attributed to the gradually decreasing diameter of the ZnO nanocones from the root to the top, which led to the graded transition of the effective refractive index [38].
(a) Absorption and (b) reflectance spectra of the ZnO nanorods, nanocons, and ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones.
Furthermore, the results may be associated with the light scattering into large angles beyond the angle of total reflection [39]. These findings suggest that the well-aligned ZnO nanocone arrays display a strong light trapping effect, which is advantageous for photovoltaic cell applications.
The ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones show higher absorption than the bare ZnO nanocones and nanorods (Fig 5A). The energy band structure of ZnO and ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocones can be schematically illustrated in Fig 4. The optical absorption increased after the ZnS shell formation because of the lower band gap of the ZnO–ZnS interface compared with either semiconductor. The charge interchange produced a lattice strain in the interface and exhibited much lower band gap than the actual band gap of ZnO and ZnS. The crystal structure relaxation produced delocalization in the bottom of the conduction band and resulted in a narrow band gap [40].
Furthermore, the formation of ZnS bonds in the ZnO lattice strongly affected the bowing in valence band edge and reduced the overall band gap of the system. The FESEM and HRTEM micrograph shows that the surface of the core–shell nanocones became rough because of the newly formed ZnS shell, which decreased the reflection of the incident light. This phenomenon indicates that ZnS coating on ZnO nanocones with high surface roughness should be an ideal photoanode structure for the ZnO–ZnS core–shell-based DSSCs.
The photovoltaic properties of the ZnO nanorods, nanocones, and core–shell structures were investigated by assembling the DSSCs and performing the standard methods described in the experimental section. The photocurrent density–voltage characteristics of the ZnO nanostructures are shown in Fig 6. The related physical values, such as short-circuit current (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF), and overall light to electrical energy conversion efficiency (η), are summarized in Table 1. The η value can be calculated by the following equation [41]:
1
From Table 1, the ZnO nanocones cell exhibited the highest efficiency (η = 2.09%), which was almost twice that of the ZnO nanorods cell (η = 0.93%). This characteristic could be attributed to the higher VOC and JSC. The JSC of a DSSC depends on various factors, which include the electron injection efficiency, the light harvesting efficiency, and the electron collection efficiency [42]. Given that ZnO nanocones had lower surface areas with lower dye loading than ZnO nanorods (1.93×10–8 mol/cm2), and the ZnO nanocones dimensions were comparable to those of the ZnO nanorods [43]. Thus, a lower light harvesting efficiency is expected for the ZnO nanocones cells compared with the ZnO nanorods cells. Consequently, higher JSC of the ZnO nanocone-based cells was obtained because of the predominance of the exposed reactive {101̅1} facets, which improved the electron collection process and electron injection in the device [44].
(a) Comparison of photocurrent density-voltage plot of the DSSCs based on ZnO nanorods, nanocons, and ZnO–ZnS nanocones (b) schematic diagram of the energy levels of the hetrostructure ZnO/ZnS photoelectrode in a DSSC.
An energy conversion efficiency of approximately 4.07%, which was much higher than those of the ZnO nanocone- and nanorod-based DSSCs, was obtained in the ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone-based DSSCs. The significant performance enhancement in the ZnO–ZnS-based DSSCs could be attributed to the core–shell structure, which consists of nanocones and nanograins. This characteristic resulted in the enhanced an internal surface area for the dye-loading (3.67×10–8 mol/cm2; almost two times higher than that of both the ZnO nanorod and ZnO nanocone photoanodes) and a remarkable increase in JSC.
However, the S atoms in the ZnS layer filled up the oxygen vacancies in the ZnO nanocone [45], which led to the reduction in the recombination of electrons in the DSSCs. Given that the high band gap of the ZnS shell material suppressed the tunneling of the electrons from the ZnO core material to the ZnS shell layer, excited electrons were completely confined inside the ZnO. Moreover, the ZnS layer on the ZnO nanocone formed a type-II band alignment. The interface of the ZnO–ZnS heterostructure led to the large elastic strain, which might have increased the oscillator strength; in addition, the individual band gap could be smaller than the initial value (Fig 4) [46]. According to the thermodynamic theory, the variation in the free energy for the electron transfer from the excited dye molecules (LOMO) to the conduction band of ZnO–ZnS heterostructure is more positive than that of bare ZnO nanocones. However, the changes in the free energy for the recombination of coated ZnO nanocones were less positive than that of bare ZnO. Consequently, dark exciton formation in the ZnO–ZnS nanocone arrays reduced the recombination rate of excitons such that the ZnS layer improved the carrier collection and significantly increased the current density in the photoanode materials [34].
It is well known that EIS is a powerful tool to study charge separation/transfer and recombination processes in solar cells. EIS characterizations were carried out to further clarify the shell effect on photogenerated charge separation processes of ZnO nanocone arrays. The radius of the arc on the EIS spectra represents the electron transfer resistance at the surface of electrodes. In Fig 7, the arc radius on EIS Nyquist plot of the ZnO/ZnS core/shell nanowires is smaller than that of the ZnO nanorods and cones, which suggest that ZnS shell leads to a more effective charge separation and a faster interfacial charge transfer. These EIS results clearly indicate that the introduction of ZnS shell to ZnO nanocones can effectively improve the photogenerated charge separation process.
Conclusions
A new type of high-antireflection ZnO–ZnS heterostructure arrays was synthesized on an FTO substrate using a facile and cost-effective two-step approach that combined EFAS and aqueous solution methods. The optical absorption and reflectance spectra of the samples indicated that the antireflective property of the ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone was markedly higher than that of any previously obtained ZnO structures. The PL spectrum demonstrated a considerable enhancement in the luminescence intensity and a small redshift in the UV region. This phenomenon could be attributed to the strain caused by the lattice mismatch between ZnO and ZnS. The DSSCs assembled with C218 dye-coated ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone photoanodes exhibited the highest energy conversion efficiency of about 4.07%. The improved efficiency could be explained by the enhancement of light-trapping effect caused by the cone-shaped ZnO nanostructures and effective retardation of the charge recombination process by the ZnS coating on the ZnO nanocones. These results indicate that vertically aligned ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanocone arrays can be potentially applied to optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells, because of their higher surface-to-volume ratio, better light-trapping effect, and longer carrier lifetime than any other structures.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge that this work were supported by Long-Term Research Grant Scheme for Nanostructures, Nanomaterials and Devices for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production (600-RMI/LRGS 5/3 (3/2013)) grant and the High Impact Research MoE Grant No. UM.C/625/1/HIR/MoE/CHAN/04 from the Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JR MHM. Performed the experiments: JR SM. Analyzed the data: JR CHRO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JR MHM CHRO MRM. Wrote the paper: JR.
References
- 1. Rouhi J, Alimanesh M, Mahmud S, Dalvand RA, Ooi CHR, Rusop M (2014) A novel method for synthesis of well-aligned hexagonal cone-shaped ZnO nanostructures in field emission applications. Materials Letters 125: 147–150. pmid:24227691
- 2. Pawar RC, Kim H-s, Lee CS (2013) Improved field emission and photocatalysis properties of cacti-like zinc oxide nanostructures. Scripta Materialia 68: 142–145.
- 3. Gedamu D, Paulowicz I, Kaps S, Lupan O, Wille S, Haidarschin G, et al. (2014) Rapid fabrication technique for interpenetrated ZnO nanotetrapod networks for fast UV sensors. Advanced Materials 26: 1541–1550. pmid:24249633
- 4. Mishra Y, Chakravadhanula V, Hrkac V, Jebril S, Agarwal D, Mohapatra S, et al. (2012) Crystal growth behaviour in Au-ZnO nanocomposite under different annealing environments and photoswitchability. Journal of Applied Physics 112: 064308.
- 5. Mishra YK, Kaps S, Schuchardt A, Paulowicz I, Jin X, Gedamu D, et al. (2014) Versatile fabrication of complex shaped metal oxide nano-microstructures and their interconnected networks for multifunctional applications. KONA Powder Part J 31: 92–110.
- 6. Jin X, Götz M, Wille S, Mishra YK, Adelung R, Zollfrank C (2013) A Novel Concept for Self‐Reporting Materials: Stress Sensitive Photoluminescence in ZnO Tetrapod Filled Elastomers. Advanced Materials 25: 1342–1347. pmid:23192988
- 7. Mishra YK, Kaps S, Schuchardt A, Paulowicz I, Jin X, Gedamu D, et al. (2013) Fabrication of macroscopically flexible and highly porous 3D semiconductor networks from interpenetrating nanostructures by a simple flame transport approach. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 30: 775–783.
- 8. Lee Y- J, Ruby DS, Peters DW, McKenzie BB, Hsu JW (2008) ZnO nanostructures as efficient antireflection layers in solar cells. Nano letters 8: 1501–1505. pmid:18416581
- 9. Chaoui R, Mahmoudi B, Si Ahmed Y (2008) Porous silicon antireflection layer for solar cells using metal‐assisted chemical etching. physica status solidi (a) 205: 1724–1728.
- 10. Pawar R, Shaikh J, Shinde P, Patil P (2011) Dye sensitized solar cells based on zinc oxide bottle brush. Materials Letters 65: 2235–2237.
- 11. Sagawa T, Yoshikawa S, Imahori H (2010) One-dimensional nanostructured semiconducting materials for organic photovoltaics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 1: 1020–1025.
- 12. Jiu J, Isoda S, Wang F, Adachi M (2006) Dye-sensitized solar cells based on a single-crystalline TiO2 nanorod film. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110: 2087–2092. pmid:16471788
- 13. Keis K, Bauer C, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A, Westermark K, Rensmo H, et al. (2002) Nanostructured ZnO electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cell applications. Journal of Photochemistry and photobiology A: Chemistry 148: 57–64.
- 14. Xu F, Sun L (2011) Solution-derived ZnO nanostructures for photoanodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science 4: 818–841.
- 15. Ku C-H, Wu J-J (2007) Electron transport properties in ZnO nanowire array/nanoparticle composite dye-sensitized solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 91: 093117.
- 16. Song J, Lim S (2007) Effect of seed layer on the growth of ZnO nanorods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111: 596–600.
- 17. Greene LE, Law M, Goldberger J, Kim F, Johnson JC, Zhang Y, et al. (2003) Low‐temperature wafer‐scale production of ZnO nanowire arrays. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 42: 3031–3034. pmid:12851963
- 18. Ku C-H, Wu J-J (2007) Chemical bath deposition of ZnO nanowire–nanoparticle composite electrodes for use in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology 18: 505706.
- 19. Hua G, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Cao X, Xu W, Zhang L (2008) Fabrication of ZnO nanowire arrays by cycle growth in surfactantless aqueous solution and their applications on dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Letters 62: 4109–4111.
- 20. Law M, Greene LE, Johnson JC, Saykally R, Yang P (2005) Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nature materials 4: 455–459. pmid:15895100
- 21. Thavasi V, Renugopalakrishnan V, Jose R, Ramakrishna S (2009) Controlled electron injection and transport at materials interfaces in dye sensitized solar cells. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 63: 81–99.
- 22. Wang X, Zhu H, Xu Y, Wang H, Tao Y, Hark S, et al. (2010) Aligned ZnO/CdTe core− shell nanocable arrays on indium tin oxide: synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties. ACS nano 4: 3302–3308. pmid:20446665
- 23. Lo SS, Mirkovic T, Chuang CH, Burda C, Scholes GD (2011) Emergent Properties Resulting from Type‐II Band Alignment in Semiconductor Nanoheterostructures. Advanced Materials 23: 180–197. pmid:21069886
- 24. Law M, Greene LE, Radenovic A, Kuykendall T, Liphardt J, Yang P (2006) ZnO-Al2O3 and ZnO-TiO2 core-shell nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110: 22652–22663. pmid:17092013
- 25. Wang K, Chen J, Zhou W, Zhang Y, Yan Y, Pern J, et al. (2008) Direct growth of highly mismatched type II ZnO/ZnSe core/shell nanowire arrays on transparent conducting oxide substrates for solar cell applications. Advanced Materials 20: 3248–3253.
- 26. Han J, Fan F, Xu C, Lin S, Wei M, Duan X, et al. (2010) ZnO nanotube-based dye-sensitized solar cell and its application in self-powered devices. Nanotechnology 21: 405203. pmid:20829568
- 27. Yan C, Xue D (2006) Conversion of ZnO nanorod arrays into ZnO/ZnS nanocable and ZnS nanotube arrays via an in situ chemistry strategy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110: 25850–25855. pmid:17181231
- 28. Chao HY, Cheng JH, Lu JY, Chang YH, Cheng CL, Chen YF (2010) Growth and characterization of type-II ZnO/ZnTe core-shell nanowire arrays for solar cell applications. Superlattices and Microstructures 47: 160–164.
- 29. Rouhi J, Alimanesh M, Dalvand R, Ooi CHR, Mahmud S, Mahmood MR (2014) Optical properties of well-aligned ZnO nanostructure arrays synthesized by an electric field-assisted aqueous solution method. Ceramics International 40: 11193–11198.
- 30. Jothi NN, Joshi AG, Vijay RJ, Muthuvinayagam A, Sagayaraj P (2013) Investigation on one-pot hydrothermal synthesis, structural and optical properties of ZnS quantum dots. Materials Chemistry and Physics 138: 186–191.
- 31. Liu X, Wu X, Cao H, Chang R (2004) Growth mechanism and properties of ZnO nanorods synthesized by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Journal of Applied Physics 95: 3141–3147.
- 32. Pawar RC, Lee J- W, Patil VB, Lee CS (2013) Synthesis of multi-dimensional ZnO nanostructures in aqueous medium for the application of gas sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 187: 323–330.
- 33. Sepulveda-Guzman S, Reeja-Jayan B, de La Rosa E, Torres-Castro A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez V, Jose-Yacaman M (2009) Synthesis of assembled ZnO structures by precipitation method in aqueous media. Materials Chemistry and Physics 115: 172–178.
- 34. Schrier J, Demchenko DO, Wang L-W, Alivisatos AP (2007) Optical properties of ZnO/ZnS and ZnO/ZnTe heterostructures for photovoltaic applications. Nano letters 7: 2377–2382. pmid:17645365
- 35. Datta A, Panda SK, Chaudhuri S (2007) Synthesis and optical and electrical properties of CdS/ZnS core/shell nanorods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111: 17260–17264.
- 36. Yoo Y-Z, Jin Z-W, Chikyow T, Fukumura T, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H (2002) S doping in ZnO film by supplying ZnS species with pulsed-laser-deposition method. Applied Physics Letters 81: 3798–3800.
- 37. Kao M-C, Chen H-Z, Young S-L, Lin C-C, Kung C-Y (2012) Structure and photovoltaic properties of ZnO nanowire for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale research letters 7: 1–6. pmid:22214494
- 38. Zhu J, Yu Z, Burkhard GF, Hsu C- M, Connor ST, Xu Y, et al. (2008) Optical absorption enhancement in amorphous silicon nanowire and nanocone arrays. Nano letters 9: 279–282.
- 39. O'Brien PG, Kherani NP, Chutinan A, Ozin GA, John S, Zukotynski S (2008) Silicon Photovoltaics Using Conducting Photonic Crystal Back‐Reflectors. Advanced Materials 20: 1577–1582.
- 40. Jensen LL, Muckerman JT, Newton MD (2008) First-Principles Studies of the Structural and Electronic Properties of the (Ga1-x Zn x)(N1-x O x) Solid Solution Photocatalyst. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112: 3439–3446.
- 41. Lan Z, Wu J, Lin J, Huang M (2007) Quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with a novel efficient absorbent for liquid electrolyte based on PAA–PEG hybrid. Journal of Power Sources 164: 921–925.
- 42. Wang H, Peter LM (2009) A comparison of different methods to determine the electron diffusion length in dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113: 18125–18133.
- 43. Anta JA, Guillén E, Tena-Zaera Rn (2012) ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116: 11413–11425.
- 44. Chang J, Ahmed R, Wang H, Liu H, Li R, Wang P, et al. (2013) ZnO nanocones with high-index {101̅1} facets for enhanced energy conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117: 13836–13844.
- 45. Li J, Zhao D, Meng X, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Shen D, et al. (2006) Enhanced ultraviolet emission from ZnS-coated ZnO nanowires fabricated by self-assembling method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110: 14685–14687. pmid:16869573
- 46. Liu W, Wang R, Wang N (2010) From ZnS nanobelts to ZnO/ZnS heterostructures: Microscopy analysis and their tunable optical property. Applied Physics Letters 97: 041916-041916-041913.