Figures
Abstract
Methods
Using a random cluster sampling method, the school-based, cross-sectional Shandong Children Eye Study included children aged 4 to 18 years from the rural county of Guanxian and the city of Weihai in the province of Shandong in East China. CCR was measured by ocular biometry.
Results
CCR measurements were available for 5913 (92.9%) out of 6364 eligible children. Mean age was 10.0±3.3 years, and mean CCR was 7.84±0.27 mm (range: 6.98 to 9.35 mm). In multivariate linear regression analysis, longer CCR (i.e. flatter cornea) was significantly associated with the systemic parameters of male sex (P<0001;standardized regression coefficient beta: -0.08;regression coefficient B:-0.04; 95% Confidence Interval (CI):-0.05,-0.03), younger age (P<0.001;beta:-0.37;B:-0.03;95%CI:-0.04,-0.03), taller body height (P = 0.002;beta:0.06;B:0.001;95%CI:0.000,0.001), lower level of education of the father (P = 0.001;beta:-0.04;B:-0.01;95%CI:-0.02,-0.01) and maternal myopia (P<0.001;beta:-0.07;B:-0.04;95%CI:-0.06,-0.03), and with the ocular parameters of longer ocular axial length (P<0.001;beta:0.59;B:0.13;95%CI:0.12,0.14), larger horizontal corneal diameter (P<0.001;beta:0.19;B:0.13;95%CI:0.11,0.14), and smaller amount of cylindrical refractive error (P = 0.001;beta:-0.09;B:-0.05;95%CI:-0.06,-0.04).
Conclusions
Longer CCR (i.e., flatter corneas) (mean:7.84±0.27mm) was correlated with male sex, younger age, taller body height, lower paternal educational level, maternal myopia, longer axial length, larger corneas (i.e., longer horizontal corneal diameter), and smaller amount of cylindrical refractive error. These findings may be of interest for elucidation of the process of emmetropization and myopization and for corneal refractive surgery.
Citation: Zhang YY, Jiang WJ, Teng ZE, Wu JF, Hu YY, Lu TL, et al. (2015) Corneal Curvature Radius and Associated Factors in Chinese Children: The Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117481
Academic Editor: Steven Barnes, Dalhousie University, CANADA
Received: October 27, 2014; Accepted: December 23, 2014; Published: February 6, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Introduction
The anterior corneal curvature radius (CCR) determines two third of the optical refractive power of the eye and is thus an important parameter of the ocular optical system. Abnormal values of the CCR, such as keratoconus or cornea plana, lead to severe refractive ametropias and any disparity in CCR between the corneal meridians is the cause of corneal astigmatism. In particular in infants and young children, any abnormal CCR can be the cause of amblyopia. Numerous previous population-based studies have examined the normative values and distribution of CCR, the prevalence of diseases characterized by abnormal CCRs such as keratoconus, and factors associated with CCR in adult populations of various ethnicities [1–9]. These studies, however, were focused on adults with an age of ≥40 years, while relatively few investigations were conducted to evaluate distribution and associated factors of CCR in children [10–17]. The latter studies often included only children of special age groups, such as an age group of 7 to 9 years or an age group of less than six months or they were not population-based. In studies on a limited age spectrum however, a multivariate analysis could not fully explore the role of factors such as general anthropomorphic measurements (e.g. body height, age) and socioeconomic data which may potentially be associated with CCR. Consequently, while these studies showed that higher CCR was associated with older age and taller body height in neonates and infants aged less than one year, it has remained unclear whether CCR is associated with age and body height in children with an age of more than four years. While it was reported that CCR was positively associated with older age and taller body height in Singapore Chinese children with an age of 7 to 9 years, the Aston Eye Study demonstrated that children in Birmingham / UK did not differ in CCR between the age of 6 to 7 years and the age of 12 to 13 years [13, 18]. We therefore conducted this school-based study on children during the whole age spectrum of adolescence from 4 to 18 years, measured the CCR, assessed other ocular and general parameters, evaluated the distribution of CCR, and examined potential associations between CCR and other ocular factors and systemic parameters in multivariate analysis. We performed this study in the Eastern Chinese province of Shandong, since China is the country which may most be affected by the marked increase in the prevalence of myopia in particular in the young generations, in a manner, that already nowadays myopia has been feared as one of the upcoming most common causes for visual impairment and blindness in the next older generations of China [19].
Method
The Shandong Children Eye Study was a school-based cross-sectional study in East China. The Ethics Board of the Eye Institute of the Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the local Administration of the Education and School Board approved the study, and the parents or guardians of the children gave written consent, according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was performed in the city of Weihai in the eastern part of Shandong, and in the rural areas of Guanxian in the west of Shandong. Kindergarten, elementary schools, junior high schools and senior high schools in Guanxian and in Weihai were randomly selected or the study. The age of the participants ranged between four years to 18 years. The study has been described in detail recently [20,21].
All study participants underwent an interview with standardized questions. The questionnaire consisted of questions on the children’s family history, time spent outdoors and the activities performed outdoors, time spent indoor and the activities carried out indoors, intensity of learning and studying for school, lifestyle, etc. The structure of the questionnaire was similar to the design of the questionnaire used previously in the Refractive Error Study in Children (RESC) studies [22]. General and ophthalmic examinations were then carried out. Performing auto-refractometry (KR-8900, Topcon, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan), we measured the spherical refractive error and cylindrical refractive error, corneal astigmatism, and CCR. If the difference between the maximum and minimum value of the spherical refractive error or cylindrical refractive error were less than 0.5 diopters, the measurement were repeated. The spherical equivalent of refractive error was defined as the spherical value of refractive error plus one half of the cylindrical value. All refractive errors were examined under cycloplegia, which was achieved by applying 1% cyclopentolate eye drops (Alcon, Ft. Worth, Texas, USA) at least thrice. Intraocular pressure was measured by a non-contact tonometer (CT-80A, Topcon, Co., Tokyo, Japan). Ocular biometric parameters such as axial length and corneal horizontal diameter were measured by biometry (IOL- Master; V5.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The axial length / CCR ratio (AL/CCR) was calculated by dividing the axial length value by the CCR. All examinations were undertaken by trained ophthalmologists and optometrists.
Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available statistical software package (SPSS for Windows, version 21.0, IBM-SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). In a first step, we determined the mean value (presented as mean ± standard deviation) of the main outcome parameters. In a second step, we performed univariate analyses of the associations between CCR and other ocular and systemic parameters. In a third step, a multivariate analysis was performed with CCR as dependent parameter and all of those parameters as independent parameters which were significantly associated with CCR in the univariate analyses. We first removed parameters for which the analysis showed a collinearity. We then removed all those parameters that were no longer significantly associated with CCR in the multivariate analysis in a step-by-step manner, through a combination of stepwise, forward, and backward regression analysis. In case of doubt, we kept those parameters that were considered to be closer related to CCR and dropped those parameters which were secondarily associated with CCR. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. All P-values were 2-sided and were considered statistically significant when the values were less than 0.01.
Results
Out of 6364 eligible children fulfilling the inclusion criterion of an age from 4 to 18 years, CCR measurements were eventually available for 5913 (92.9%) participants (2792 (47.2%) girls). The examination was refused by 328 (5.2%) children and 123(1.9%) children did not accomplish the whole general and ophthalmic examination to gain reliable CCR measurements. The mean age was 10.0 ± 3.3 years (median: 10.0 years; range, 4 to 18 years), and the mean refractive error (spherical equivalent) was −0.21 ± 2.10 diopters (median: 0.50 diopters; range: −11.75 to 10.5 diopters) for the right eyes and-0.13 ± 2.08 diopters (median: 0.50 diopters; range: -11.75 to 11.00 diopters) for the left eyes.
The mean CCR was 7.84 ± 0.27 mm (median: 7.84 mm; range: 6.98 to 9.35 mm) (Table 1; Fig. 1) for right eyes. Mean CCR of the left eyes was 7.84 ± 0.26 mm (median: 7.84 mm; range: 6.98 to 9.36 mm) (Table 1). The measurements of CCR were significantly (P<0.001) higher in the left eyes than in the right eyes. The mean absolute amount of the inter-eye difference was 0.050 ± 0.059 mm. CCR was not normally distributed for both eyes (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P = 0.001, and P<0.001, respectively).
In univariate analysis, CCR was not significantly (P = 0.08) associated with age within the age period from four to 14 years. Beyond an age of 14 eyes, CCR was significantly (P = 0.01) lower than for the age period of 14 or less years (Fig. 2). If the study population was stratified by sex, CCR was significantly lower in the older group than in the younger group for boys (P = 0.03, while the difference was not significant for girls (P = 0.55) (Fig. 2).
In univariate analysis, higher CCR was significantly associated with the systemic parameters of male sex (P<0.001), higher school grade (P = 0.01), urban region of habitation (P<0.001), taller body height (P<0.001), heavier body weight (P<0.001), higher body mass index (P<0.001), heavier birth weight (P = 0.01), higher paternal and maternal level of education (P<0.001), less maternal myopia (P = 0.007), more total time spent outdoors (P = 0.001), more time spent using a computer (P<0.001), brighter illumination during studying (P<0.001), more intake of rice (P = 0.002) and red meat (P<0.001) and protein-rich food (P<0.001), less intake of wheat associated food (P<0.001), less intake of sweet food (P = 0.02) (Table 2). Higher CCR was significantly associated with the ocular parameters of higher (i.e., hyperopic) refractive error (P = 0.03), higher cylindrical refractive error (P<0.001), longer axial length (P<0.001) (Fig. 3), longer horizontal corneal diameter (P<0.001), and higher intraocular pressure measurements (P<0.001) (Table 2). CCR was not significantly associated with paternal myopia (P = 0.13), the total time spent indoors (P = 0.09), time spent indoors reading or writing (P = 0.28), and the time spent indoors watching television or movies (P = 0.52).
In the multivariate linear regression analysis, we dropped the parameter of body weight due to collinearity (VIF: 58) with body height and body mass index, the parameter of school grade (VIF: 5.09), and the parameter of refractive error due to its collinearity with axial length. We then dropped in a step-wise manner those parameters which were no longer significantly associated with CCR in the multivariate model: birth weight (P = 0.49), intake of red meat-rich food (P = 0.91), intake of sweet food (P = 0.75), level of maternal education (P = 0.88), food rich in wheat product (P = 0.66), time spent using a computer (P = 0.90), body mass index (P = 0.92), illumination during reading (P = 1.00), food rich in rice (P = 0.86), intraocular pressure (P = 0.61), total time spent outdoors (P = 0.54), intake of protein-rich food (P = 0.80), and region of habitation (P = 0.09). In the final model, longer CCR (i.e. flatter cornea) was significantly associated with the systemic parameters of male sex (P<0001), younger age (P<0.001), taller body height (P = 0.002), lower level of education of the father (P = 0.001) and maternal myopia (P<0.001), and with the ocular parameters of longer ocular axial length (P<0.001), larger horizontal corneal diameter (P<0.001), and smaller amount of cylindrical refractive error (P = 0.001) (Table 3).
Discussion
In our school-based study in the East Chinese province of Shandong, longer CCR (i.e., flatter corneas) were correlated with female sex, younger age, taller body height, lower paternal educational level, maternal myopia, longer axial length, larger corneas (i.e., longer horizontal corneal diameter), and smaller amount of cylindrical refractive error. Its mean value was 7.84 ± 0.27 mm.
These results partially confirm previous findings and contradict others. In previous study populations, CCR was not significantly associated with age in children [11,12]. In girls, however, CCR showed the tendency of an increase up to the age of 10 years and then a decrease in the age period from 10 to 18 years. In boys, CCR reached a peak at the age of 13 years. A similar tendency was observed in our study in which CCR did not vary significantly up to an age of 14 years after which it decreased significantly (Fig. 2). The Singapore Chinese Children Eye Study showed the CCR increasing with older age in children aged 7 to 9 years [23]. The association between CCR and age may also be of interest for corneal refractive surgery, since they suggest that at least up the age of 18 years, corneal refractive power may not be constant over time.
In agreement with previous investigations such as the Singapore Chinese Children Eye Study and a population-based study of Australian children, CCR was in our study population larger in boys than in girls [15,23]. Similar tendencies were reported for adults [24]. The inter-sex difference in our study (mean CCR in boys: 7.90 ± 0.26 versus mean CCR in girls: 7.77 ± 0.25 mm) of 0.13 mm was similar to the figure reported in previous studies with sex-related differences in CCR ranging between from 0.07 mm to 0.17 mm [25,26].
The mean CCR in the right eye (7.8364 ± 0.2649 mm (median: 7.84 mm; range: 6.98 to 9.36 mm)) was significantly (P<0.001) larger than in the left eye (7.8416 ± 0.2642 mm (median: 7.84 mm; range: 6.98 to 9.36 mm)). In view of the relatively small difference between the right eye and left eye, in view of the relatively high number of 5913 study participants, and in view the fact of using a paired sample test which as compared to un-paired sample tests usually shows a higher statistical significance of a difference, one may infer that the statistically significant difference in CCR between the right eye and the left eye may not have a marked clinically importance.
CCR was longer in children with taller body height after adjusting for factors such as sex and age in the multivariate model. It agrees with the findings made in the Avon Longitudinal Study, the Singapore Chinese Children Eye study, and a population-based study of Australian children [13,18,27]. As a corollary, CCR was longer in adults with taller body height, as reported in the Burmese Meiktila Eye Study, the Singapore Malay Eye Study and the Reykjavik Eye Study [5,6,28]. It may reflect a tendency that taller people have larger eyes with larger horizontal and vertical corneal diameters, longer CCR, and longer horizontal and vertical globe diameters [29]. It also agrees with the Children U.K. birth cohort study in which body height and weight growth trajectories, especially shortly after birth, were positively associated with axial length and corneal curvature [30].
In univariate analysis, CCR was associated with heavier birth weight, an association which lost its significance in the multivariate analysis. It may fit with the results of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children U.K. birth cohort study in which body height and weight growth trajectories, especially shortly after birth, were positively associated with axial length and corneal curvature [30]. The authors concluded that shared growth mechanisms may contribute to scaling of eye and body size. It also fits with the association between longer CCR (and longer horizontal corneal diameters, i.e. larger corneas) and taller body height as discussed above.
The association between longer CCR and longer axial length are in agreement with previous studies on children and adults [9,31–33]. The correlation suggests that a flatter cornea may (at least partially) compensate for axial elongation to preserve emmetropia in the normal growth of the eye. Interestingly, highly myopic eyes with an axial length of more than 26.5 mm or a myopic refractive error of more than-8 diopters do not show an association between corneal curvature radius and axial length in adults [9].
In the multivariate model, shorter CCR (i.e. steeper corneas) was significantly associated with a higher amount of corneal astigmatism. Similar observations were made in previous studies [34]. Relatively few investigations reported on the association between longer CCR and longer horizontal corneal diameter. In a previous investigation, non-highly myopic eyes with longer CCR had a longer corneal diameter and larger optic disc, suggesting an association between corneal flatness, corneal size and optic nerve head size [34]. It fits with the general notion that large eyes with respect to the horizontal and vertical globe diameters have large optic nerve heads, large corneas, a large retinal surface area and a higher count of retinal photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium cells and retinal ganglion cell axons [29,35–37].
Interestingly, CCR was significantly associated with the amount of time spent outdoors or spent indoors with studying in the univariate analysis, while in the final multivariate analysis, these associations were no longer statistically significant. It may suggest that the parameters of time spent indoors and of time spent outdoors have a stronger influence on axial length than on CCR. In multivariate models of previous studies, longer axial length in school children was strongly associated with more time spent indoors or less time spent outdoors [38]. It would explain that in the multivariate analysis of our study, CCR was mainly associated with axial length, while after adjusting for axial length, it was no longer associated with the time spent indoors or the time spent outdoors. It would also fit with anatomical measurements that myopic eyes, and in particular highly myopic eyes, showed a thinning of the sclera and choroid mostly in the posterior segment, while the sclera in the anterior segment did not differ markedly between myopic eyes and emmetropic eyes [39]. In a similar manner, central corneal thickness was not associated with axial length in previous population studies on adults [40].
Potential limitations of our study should be mentioned. First, we measured only the anterior corneal curvature radius while the posterior corneal curvature radius was not assessed. The study could therefore address only the corneal refractive power anterior of the anterior corneal surface, but not the total refractive power of the cornea. Second, central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth were not recorded, so that the contribution of these biometric parameters to the optic system of the eyes could not be addressed. Third, our study may not be representative for the whole population of China in view of the heterogeneity of the country.
In conclusion, longer CCR (i.e., flatter corneas) was correlated with male sex, younger age, taller body height, lower paternal educational level, maternal myopia, longer axial length, larger corneas (i.e., longer horizontal corneal diameter), and smaller amount of cylindrical refractive error. These findings may be of interest for elucidation of the process of emmetropization and myopization and for corneal refractive surgery.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YYZ WJJ ZET JFW YYH TLL HW WS XRW HSB JBJ. Performed the experiments: YYZ WJJ ZET JFW YYH TLL HW WS XRW HSB. Analyzed the data: YYZ WJJ ZET JFW YYH TLL HW WS XRW HSB JBJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HSB. Wrote the paper: YYZ WJJ ZET JFW YYH TLL HW WS XRW HSB JBJ.
References
- 1. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, et al. (2001) Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:73–80. pmid:11133850
- 2. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Sverrisson T, et al. (2002) Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:11–15. pmid:11906297
- 3. George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Ramesh SV, Raju P, et al. (2003) Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma: a population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol 87:399–402. pmid:12642298
- 4. Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma , et al. (2005) Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 46:4450–4460. pmid:16303933
- 5. Wu HM, Gupta A, Newland HS, Selva D, Aung T, et al. (2007) Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 35:834–839. pmid:18173412
- 6. Lim LS, Saw SM, Jeganathan VS, Tay WT, Aung T, et al. (2010) Distribution and determinants of ocular biometric parameters in an Asian population: the Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:103–9. pmid:19684013
- 7. Yuen LH, He M, Aung T, Htoon HM, Tan DT, et al. (2010) Biometry of the cornea and anterior chamber in chinese eyes: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 51:3433–3440. pmid:20130280
- 8. Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, et al. (2010) Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology 117:417–423. pmid:20031227
- 9. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Sinha A, Gupta R (2011) Corneal refractive power and its associations with ocular and general parameters: The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Ophthalmology 118:1805–1811. pmid:21665279
- 10. Abrahamsson M, Fabian G, Sjostrand J (1990) A longitudinal study of a population based sample of astigmatic children. II. The changeability of anisometropia. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68:435–440. pmid:2220360
- 11. Garner LF, Yap MK, Kinnear RF, Frith MJ (1995) Ocular dimensions and refraction in Tibetan children. Optom Vis Sci 72:266–271. pmid:7609952
- 12. Lin LL, Shih YF, Tsai CB, Chen CJ, Lee LA, et al. (1999) Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci 76: 275–281. pmid:10375241
- 13. Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chia KS, et al. (2002) Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1408–1413. pmid:11980854
- 14. Fan DS, Rao SK, Cheung EY, Islam M, Chew S, et al. (2004) Astigmatism in Chinese preschool children: prevalence, change, and effect on refractive development. Br J Ophthalmol 88:938–941. pmid:15205242
- 15. Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Martin FJ, et al. (2005) Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2748–2754. pmid:16043846
- 16. Ip JM, Huynh SC, Robaei D, Kifley A, Rose KA, et al. (2008) Ethnic differences in refraction and ocular biometry in a population-based sample of 11–15-year-old Australian children. Eye (Lond) 22:649–656. pmid:17277756
- 17. O’Donoghue L, Rudnicka AR, McClelland JF, Logan NS, Owen CG, et al. (2011) Refractive and corneal astigmatism in white school children in Northern Ireland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4048–4053. pmid:21372019
- 18. Logan NS, Shah P, Rudnicka AR, Gilmartin B, Owen CG (2011) Childhood ethnic differences in ametropia and ocular biometry: the Aston Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:550–558. pmid:21762431
- 19. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM (2012) Myopia. Lancet 379:1739–1748. pmid:22559900
- 20. Wu JF, Bi HS, Wang SM, Hu YY, Wu H, et al. (2013) Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS One 8:e82763. pmid:24376575
- 21. Jiang WJ, Wu JF, Hu YY, Wu H, Sun W, et al. (2014) Intraocular pressure and associated factors in children: The Shandong Children Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:4128–4134. pmid:24876285
- 22. McKean-Cowdin R, Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Wen G, Kim J, et al. (2013) Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in Asian and Non-Hispanic white preschool children: Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 120:2117–2124. pmid:23697956
- 23. Saw SM, Carkeet A, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan DT (2002) Component dependent risk factors for ocular parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Ophthalmology 109:2065–2071. pmid:12414416
- 24. Lee KE, Klein BE, Klein R, Quandt Z, Wong TY (2009) Association of age, stature, and education with ocular dimensions in an older white population. Arch Ophthalmol 127:88–93. pmid:19139346
- 25. Scholz K, Messner A, Eppig T, Bruenner H, Langenbucher A (2009) Topography-based assessment of anterior corneal curvature and asphericity as a function of age, sex, and refractive status. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1046–1054. pmid:19465291
- 26. Goto T, Klyce SD, Zheng X, Maeda N, Kuroda T, et al. (2001) Gender- and age-related differences in corneal topography. Cornea 20:270–276. pmid:11322415
- 27. Ojaimi E, Morgan IG, Robaei D, Rose KA, Smith W, et al. (2005) Effect of stature and other anthropometric parameters on eye size and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4424–4429. pmid:16303929
- 28. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K (2005) Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:734–738. pmid:16396653
- 29. Papastathopoulos KI, Jonas JB, Panda-Jonas S (1995) Large optic discs in large eyes, small optic discs in small eyes. Exp Eye Res 60:459–461. pmid:7789425
- 30. Northstone K, Guggenheim JA, Howe LD, Tilling K, Paternoster L, et al. (2013) Body stature growth trajectories during childhood and the development of myopia. Ophthalmology 120:1064–1073. pmid:23415774
- 31. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE, Frane SL, et al. (2005) Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3074–3080. pmid:16123404
- 32. González Blanco F, Sanz Ferńandez JC, Muńoz Sanz MA (2008) Axial length, corneal radius, and age of myopia onset. Optom Vis Sci 85:89–96. pmid:18296925
- 33. Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR, Lin LL, Shih YF (2001) The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol 85:916–919. pmid:11466244
- 34. Nieto-Bona A, Lorente-Velazquez A, Montes-Mico R (2009) Relationship between anterior corneal asphericity and refractive variables. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247: 815–820. pmid:19048270
- 35. Jonas JB, Königsreuther KA (1994) Macrodiscs in eyes with flat and large corneas. Ger J Ophthalmol 3:179–181. pmid:8038688
- 36. Panda-Jonas S, Jonas JB, Jakobczyk M, Schneider U (1994) Retinal photoreceptor count, retinal surface area, and optic disc size in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology 101:519–523. pmid:8127572
- 37. Panda-Jonas S, Jonas JB, Jakobczyk-Zmija M (1996) Retinal pigment epithelium cell count, density and correlations in normal human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 121:181–189 pmid:8623888
- 38. Guo Y, Liu LJ, Xu L, Tang P, Lv YY, et al. (2013) Myopic shift and outdoor activity among primary school children: One-year follow-up study in Beijing. PLoS One 8:e75260. pmid:24086484
- 39. Vurgese S, Panda-Jonas S, Jonas JB (2012) Scleral thickness in human eyes. PLoS One 7:e29692. pmid:22238635
- 40. Nangia V, Jonas JB, Sinha A, Matin A, Kulkarni M (2010) Central corneal thickness and its association with ocular and general parameters in Indians: The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Ophthalmology 117:705–710. pmid:20045561