Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements in Oncology – An Assessment of Their Methodological Quality

  • The PLOS ONE Staff
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

Figures 1 and 2 are incorrect. Please view the corrected Figures 1 and 2 here.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Range and 95% confidence intervals for Rigour of development scores.

CO  =  Current Oncology. EJC  =  European Journal of Cancer. CS  =  Consensus statements. JCO  =  Journal of Clinical Oncology. CPG  =  Clinical practice guidelines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110469.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Range and 95% confidence intervals for Editorial independence scores.

CO  =  Current Oncology. EJC  =  European Journal of Cancer. CS  =  Consensus statements. JCO  =  Journal of Clinical Oncology. CPG  =  Clinical practice guidelines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110469.g002

Reference

  1. 1. Jacobs C, Graham ID, Makarski J, Chassé M, Fergusson D, et al. (2014) Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements in Oncology – An Assessment of Their Methodological Quality. PLoS ONE 9(10): e110469

Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements in Oncology – An Assessment of Their Methodological Quality. PLoS ONE 9(12): e116267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116267

Published: December 17, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.