Figures
Abstract
Background
Anti-tuberculosis drug induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) is a major adverse drug reaction associated for anti-tuberculosis therapy. The glutathione S-transferases (GST) plays a crucial role in the detoxification of hepatotoxic metabolites of anti-tuberculosis drugs.An association between GSTM1/GSTT1 null mutations and increased risk of ATDH has been demonstrated in adults. Given the ethnic differences and developmental changes, our study aims to investigate the potential impacts of GSTM1/GSTT1genotypes on the development of ATDH in Han Chinese children treated with anti-tuberculosis therapy.
Methods
Children receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy with or without evidence of ATDH were considered as the cases or controls, respectively. The GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping were performed using the polymerase chain reaction.
Results
One hundred sixty-three children (20 cases and 143 controls) with a mean age of 4.7 years (range: 2 months-14.1 years) were included. For the GSTM1, 14 (70.0%) cases and 96 (67.1%) controls had homozygous null mutations. For the GSTT1, 13 (65.0%) cases and 97 (67.8%) controls had homozygous null mutations. Neither the GSTM1, nor the GSTT1 polymorphism was significantly correlated with the occurrence of ATHD.
Citation: Liu F, Jiao A-x, Wu X-r, Zhao W, Yin Q-q, Qi H, et al. (2014) Impact of Glutathione S-Transferase M1 and T1 on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug–Induced Hepatotoxicity in Chinese Pediatric Patients. PLoS ONE 9(12): e115410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115410
Editor: Imti Choonara, Nottingham University, United Kingdom
Received: June 18, 2014; Accepted: November 22, 2014; Published: December 19, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Liu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271889), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7121007).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Tuberculosis is a threat to worldwide public health. Globally, about a third of the world's population is infected by the tuberculosis bacteria. In 2009, there were an estimated 9.4 million incident cases (equivalent to 137 cases per 100 000 population) of tuberculosis [1]. Among 22 countries with the highest burden of tuberculosis, China is the second highest after India. According to the Chinese national epidemiological survey, the infection rate of tuberculosis bacteria was around 44.5% in the whole population and 9.0% in children below 14 years. The active tuberculosis rate was about 91.8 cases per 100 000 population [2].
Anti-tuberculosis drug therapy plays an important role to control tuberculosis epidemic in children [3]. The standard pediatric anti-tuberculosis therapy includes a combination of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol. Anti-tuberculosis drug induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) is a major adverse drug reaction associated for anti-tuberculosis therapy [4], [5]. The reported incidence of ATDH ranged from 2.46% to 32.1% [6], [7]. Asymptomatic increase of transaminases is the most common clinical manifestation of ATDH, but lethal hepatic failure may also occur when treatment is not interrupted in time [8]. ATHD is a multifactorial disorder and different risk factors have been identified, e.g. ethnic, age, sex, pre-existing liver disease etc. [9]–[13].
In recent years, the pharmacogenetic research has received much attention to identify the genetic predictors of ATDH in order to individualize anti-tuberculosis therapy. Researches on the glutathione S-transferases (GST) genes have obtained promoting results to identify/predict special patient at risk of ATDH. The GST genes code for a superfamily of enzymes that are involved in the phase-II drug metabolism andplay a crucial role in the biological detoxification processes of many drugs including anti-tuberculosis drugs. They catalyze the conjugation reactions of glutathione and toxic intermediary metabolites and facilitate toxicant elimination, thereby, decreasing the risk of the drug-induced hepatotoxicity. The recent meta-analysis, which involved 13 case-control studies and more than 900 ATHD cases, has demonstrated that the GSTM1 homozygous null genotype was associated with an increased risk of ATDH [14]. Moreover, this association seems to be ethnic-dependent. East Asian patients with GSTM1 null genotype had a higher risk than Caucasians [15], Whereas, GSTT1 homozygous null genotype was a risk factor of ATHD in Caucasians [16], but not in Chinese [17].All of the published studies were conducted in adults. There was no study conducted in children. Given the ethnic difference in the correlation between the GST genetic polymorphism and ATDH, and apotential impact of age, our study aims to investigate the impacts of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on the development of ATDH in Han Chinese children receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy.
Materials and Methods
Study design and patients
A total of 223 unrelated active tuberculosis patients, who were treated with standard anti-tuberculosis protocol between 2005 and 2010, were enrolled in this study at the Tuberculosis Ward, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China). The standard anti-tuberculosis therapy protocol consists of isoniazid(INH,H) 10–20 mg/kg/day (up to a maximum of 300 mg/day), rifampicin(RFP,R) 10–20 mg/kg/day (up to a maximum of 450 mg/day), pyrazinamide(PZA,Z)20–30 mg/kg/day(up to a maximum of 1500 mg/day), ethambutol (EMB, E) 15–25 mg/kg/day, and streptomycin(SM,S) 20–30 mg/kg/day (up to a maximum of 750 mg/day). For primary complex and infiltrative pulmonary tuberculosis, INH and RFP is used for 6–9 months; for tuberculosis of bronchial lymph nodes merge of bronchial tuberculosis, infiltrative pulmonary tuberculosis with cavity and spread of bronchogenic, the treatment is started with INH/RFP/PZA for 3 months and followed by INH/RFP for 3–6 months; For miliary tuberculosis and caseous pulmonary tuberculosis, the treatment is started with INH/RFP/PZA/SM for 2 months, followed by INH/RFP/PZA for 1 month and INH/RFP for 6 months, and then, according to patient's clinical condition to decide if continues with INH for 3 months. For disseminated tuberculosis, the treatment is started with INH/RFP/PZA for 3 months, (SM can be added in serious case), followed by INH/RFP for 6–9 months. For tuberculous meningitis, the treatment is started with INH/RFP/PZA for3 months(SM/EMB can be added), and followed by INH/RFP for 9 months (or 6 months after cerebrospinal fluid cell count and biochemical became normal).
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Beijing Children's Hospital and written informed consents were obtained from all of the enrolled children or their parents/guardians. Patients who meet the following inclusion criteria were eligible for the study: (i) Chinese Han children aged between 0 and 16 years; (ii) diagnosis of active tuberculosis by clinical examination, radiological and microbiological investigations; (iii) standard anti-tuberculosis treatment has been started for at least two weeks; (iv) serum transaminases were normal before treatment (alanine aminotransferase ALT<40 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase AST<40 IU/L). Patients with pre-existing liver disease, viral hepatitis, chronic alcoholism, or history of intake of other hepatotoxic drugs were excluded from the study.
In this case-control study, the case was selected from children with ATDH and fulfilled the inclusion criteria mentioned above. The diagnostic criteria of ATDH was based on the international consensus [18]–[20]: (i) serum ALT>2×ULN (upper limit of normal, 40 IU/L); or (ii) serum direct bilirubin (DBil)>2×ULN (6.8 µmol/L); or (iii) increases of serum AST (40 IU/L), alkaline phosphatase (ALP,220 IU/L) and total bilirubin (TBil, 19.0 µmol/L), moreover, one of them>2×ULN; or (iv) any index mentioned above>1×ULN and associated with liver damage symptoms, such as skin or sclera yellow dye, severe anorexia, nausea, vomiting, fever, rash, itching. Conform to anyone of above four is defined as liver damage, and liver damage occurred after receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy and was relieved when the dose of tuberculosis drugs was reduced or treatment was stopped.
Controls were defined as patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria but did not have any symptoms and/or laboratorial evidence of liver dysfunction during the anti-tuberculosis therapy. Controls were matched to cases on the basis of age, sex and anti-tuberculosis therapy.
The flow chart of our study is presented in fig. 1. Overall, 223 tuberculosis children were screened, 60 were excluded and 163 were included in the final analysis (20 for case and 143 for control). For 20 cases, 1 patient was treated with INH, 1 patient with INH/RFP, 15 patients with INH/RFP/PZA, and 3 patients with INH/RFP/PZA/EMB.
A total of 223 unrelated active tuberculosis patients treated with standard anti-tuberculosis protocol between 2005 and 2010. According to inclusion criteria, we got 20for case and 143 for control.
According to the most recently published study in adults, the significant impacts of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutations on the risk of ATHD have been demonstrated in 17 ATHD patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.59 [21]. Using this OR, 20 ATHD children, included in the present study, is sufficient to reach a statistical significance (P<0.05) for a 1∶7 mating case-control study with a risk alpha of 0.1 and a power of 0.8, based on Chi-square with Yates continuity correction method.
GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping
The isolation of genomic DNA was carried out from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using a standard procedure. The GSTM1and GSTT1 polymorphisms were determined using a multiplex PCR protocol. The primers as previously described [22] with minor modifications are shown in Table 1. PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 µl. The reaction condition of “GSTM1 gene/GSTT1 gene” was: 3 min at 94°C for degeneration, and then 30 cycles (30 s at 94°C, flowed by 30 s at 65°C/57°C and 1 min at 72°C, and finally 5 min at 72°C). The reaction condition of “GSTM1 deletion/GSTT1 deletion” was: 3 min at 94°C for degeneration, and then 40 cycles (10 s at 98°C, flowed by 5 s at 58°C/68°C and 10 min at 72°C, and finally 5 min at 72°C). GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes were detected by the absence or presence of a band of PCR product in a 1.5% agarose gel (containing 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide), which was visualized by UV light and compared with the molecular weight marker.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (for normal distribution) or as the median with range (for non-normal distribution). Quantitative variables were analysed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Genotypic frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were compared between cases and controls using a chi-squared (2×2 table) test with Yates' correction. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
In our study, there were no significant differences in age, sex and liver function at baseline (before treatment) between the cases and controls. As expected, the medians of ALT and AST during treatment were significantly higher in the cases as compared to the controls. In the cases, ATDH occurred in the initial phase of drug therapy (median of 16 days, range 7–26 days), and ALT level returned rapidly to normal value after stopping the treatment (median of 18 days, range 7–39 days) (Table 2).
For the GSTM1, 14 children (70.0%) in cases and 96 children (67.1%) in controls had homozygous null mutations, while no patient in cases and 7 children (4.9%) in controls had heterozygous null mutations. For the GSTT1, 13 children (65.0%) in cases and 97 children (67.8%) in controls had homozygous null mutations, 5 children (25.0%) in cases and 37 children (25.9%) in controls had heterozygous null mutations. Neither the GSTM1, nor the GSTT1 polymorphism was significantly correlated with the occurrence of ATHD (Table 3).
Discussion
Our study evaluated for the first time the association between the GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphisms and risk of ATHD in children. The results did not support the GSTM1 or GSTT1 polymorphisms as risk factors of the development of ADTH in Chinese Han children receiving anti-tuberculosis drug therapy.
The efficacy and safety of anti-tuberculosis drug therapy exhibit large inter-individual variability, even in patients treated with the same kind of drugs and standard dosing regimen. Genetic factors undoubtedly contributed to this diversity, in addition to demographic factors (i.e. age, sex, diet) and clinical factors (i.e. liver and kidney function, diseases, co-medication) [9], [23], [24]. A few studies have investigated the roles of GST polymorphisms on the occurrence of ATDH (Table 4). All of the published studies were conducted in adults and showed controversial results. In Taiwan [25] and Indian [26] studies, the GSTM1 homozygous null mutation, but not the GSTT1, was a risk factor of ATDH. In Spain study [27], the GSTT1 homozygous null mutation, but not the GSTM1,was significantly associated with ATDH. In Korean [28], Brazilian [29], and another Indian studies [30], neither the GSTM1 nor the GSTT1 polymorphisms was significantly associated with ATHD.
Several confounding factors may contribute to theses controversial results. Firstly, the definitions of ATDH in these studies were different and some of them may introduce a selection bias, e.g. limited scope of liver injury index, the bias in the definition of clinical symptoms etc. Secondly, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were different in these studies, and some of them did not exclude other causes of liver injury, thereby, resulting in false positive patients in cases. Finally, the anti-tuberculosis therapeutic regimens were different. It has been reported that the risks of ATHD were not the same between different treatment combinations [14]. These confounding factors have been fully considered when designing the present study. All these conditions allow eliminating the potential impacts of these confounding factors on our results.
ATHD is an idiosyncratic drug reaction, for which reactive metabolite, rather than the parent drug, is responsible [31], [32].Drug metabolizing enzymes have critical effects by both synthesis and detoxification of reactive toxic metabolites. In the liver, isoniazid is firstly metabolized into acetylisoniazid via N-acetyltransferase (NAT), followed by hydrolysis to acetylhydrazine. Acetylhydrazine is then oxidised into hepatotoxic metabolites by CYP2E1. The hepatotoxic metabolites formed through NAT or CYP2E1 are further detoxified by GST. Clinical experience has revealed that children differ from adults in terms of the risk of ATHD. Adverse drug reaction is linked to developmental changes of drug metabolism, so it has age-dependent predisposition [33], [34], which might explain the different impacts of the GST polymorphisms on the risk of ATHD between children and adults. Indeed, The ontogeny of both NAT and CYP2E1 has been reported in children [35]–[37], who had a lower metabolism capacity as compared to adults, thereby, reducing the formation of hepatotoxic metabolites produced by NAT and CYP2E1. As a consequence, the detoxification burden is reduced and the impacts of GST polymorphisms on ATHD might be less important in children as compared to adults.
Our study had some limitations. Due to the small sample size, our study is underpowered to detect a smaller difference than the one expected. In addition, the pharmacokinetic data of parent drugs and metabolites are still missing in Chinese children. Given the ethic difference, the ontogeny data in Caucasian children should be extrapolated with caution to Chinese children. Further research is required to confirm our hypothesis.
In conclusion, in the present case-control study, we evaluated for the first time the impacts of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on the development of ATHD in children. The GSTT1 and GSTM1 null mutations did not increase the risk of ATDH in Han Chinese children. Our results do not support a routine genetic testing of GSTM1 and GSTT1 for ATHD in children.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: FL AS. Performed the experiments: XW WZ QY. Analyzed the data: HQ WJ JX LS CS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JT DS. Wrote the paper: FL EJ AS AJ.
References
- 1.
Cent Eur J Public Health (2010) WHO global tuberculosis control report 2010. 18(4): p. 237.
- 2. Wang L, Zhang H, Ruan Y, Chin DP, Xia Y, et al. (2014) Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990–2010; a longitudinal analysis of national survey data. Lancet 383(9934):2057–64 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62639-2.
- 3.
Nolan CM, Goldberg SV, Buskin SE (1999) Hepatotoxicity associated with isoniazid preventive therapy: a 7-year survey from a public health tuberculosis clinic. JAMA 281((11):): p. 1014–8.
- 4.
Garibaldi RA, Drusin RE, Ferebee SH, Gregg MB (1972) Isoniazid-associated hepatitis. Report of an outbreak. Am Rev Respir Dis 106((3):): p. 357–65.
- 5. Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, Watt CJ, Dye C (2003) Tuberculosis. Lancet 362(9387):887–899.
- 6. Shang P, Xia Y, Liu F, Wang X, Yuan Y, et al. (2011) Incidence, clinical features and impact on anti-tuberculosis treatment of anti-tuberculosis drug induced liver injury (ATLI) in China. PLoS One 6(7):e21836 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021836.
- 7.
Lee SW, Chung LS, Huang HH, Chuang TY, Liou YH, et al.. (2010) NAT2 and CYP2E1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to first-line anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14((5):): p. 622–6.
- 8. Tostmann A, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE, de Lange WC, van der Ven AJ, et al. (2008) Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: concise up-to-date review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2008 23(2):192–202.
- 9. Sharifzadeh M, Rasoulinejad M, Valipour F, Nouraie M, Vaziri S, et al. (2005) Evaluation of patient-related factors associated with causality, preventability, predictability and severity of hepatotoxicity during antituberculosis [correction of antituberclosis] treatment. Pharmacol Res 51(4):353–358.
- 10. Sharma SK (2004) Antituberculosis drugs and hepatotoxicity. Infect Genet Evol 4(2):167–70.
- 11. Singh J, Arora A, Garg PK, Thakur VS, Pande JN, Tandon RK, et al. (1995) Antituberculosis treatment-induced hepatotoxicity: role of predictive factors[J]. Postgrad Med J, 1995 71(836):359–362.
- 12. Sun HY, Chen YJ, Gau CS, Chang SC, Luh KT (2009) A prospective study of hepatitis during antituberculous treatment in Taiwanese patients and a review of the literature. J Formos Med Assoc 108(2):102–111.
- 13. Yimer G, Aderaye G, Amogne W, Makonnen E, Aklillu E, et al. (2008) Anti-tuberculosis therapy-induced hepatotoxicity among Ethiopian HIV-positive and negative patients. PLoS One 3(3):e1809 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001809.
- 14. Li C, Long J, Hu X, Zhou Y (2013) GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: an updated meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32(7):859–68 doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1831-y.
- 15. Huang YS (2014) Recent progress in genetic variation and risk of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury. J Chin Med Assoc 77(4):169–73 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2014.01.010.
- 16. Leiro V, Fernández-Villar A, Valverde D, Constenla L, Vázquez R, et al. (2008) Influence of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 homozygous null mutations on the risk of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in a Caucasian population. Liver Int 28(6):835–9 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01700.x.
- 17. Tang SW, Lv XZ, Zhang Y, Wu SS, Yang ZR, et al. (2012) CYP2E1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: a nested case-control study. J Clin Pharm Ther 37(5):588–93 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01334.x.
- 18.
Bénichou C (1990) Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders. Report of an international consensus meeting. J Hepatol 11((2):): p. 272–6.
- 19.
Danan G, Benichou C (1993) Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries. J Clin Epidemiol 46((11):): p. 1323–30.
- 20.
Maria VA, Victorino RM (1997) Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug-induced hepatitis. Hepatology 26((3):): p. 664–9.
- 21. Singla N, Gupta D, Birbian N, Singh J (2014) Association of NAT2, GST and CYP2E1 polymorphisms and anti-tuberculosis drug induced hepatotoxicity. Tuberculosis(Edinb) 94(3):293–8 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2014.02.003.
- 22.
Buchard A, Sanchez JJ, Dalhoff K, Morling N (2007) Multiplex PCR detection of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene variants: simultaneously detecting GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene copy number and the allelic status of the GSTP1 Ile105Val genetic variant. J Mol Diagn 9((5):): p. 612–7.
- 23. Singla N, Gupta D, Birbian N, Singh J (2014) Association of NAT2, GST and CYP2E1 polymorphisms and anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Tuberculosis(Edinb) 94(3):293–8 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2014.02.003.
- 24. Ramachandran G, Kumar AK, Swaminathan S (2011) Pharmacokinetics of anti-tuberculosis drugs in children. Indian J Pediatr 78(4):435–42 doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-010-0304-x. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
- 25.
Huang YS, Su WJ, Huang YH, Chen CY, Chang FY, et al.. (2007) Genetic polymorphisms of manganese superoxide dismutase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1, and the susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol 47((1):): p. 128–34.
- 26.
Roy B, Chowdhury A, Kundu S, Santra A, Dey B, et al.. (2001) Increased risk of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in individuals with glutathione S-transferase M1 ‘null’ mutation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16((9):): p. 1033–7.
- 27. Leiro V, Fernández-Villar A, Valverde D, Constenla L, Vázquez R, et al. (2008) Influence of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 homozygous null mutations on the risk of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in a Caucasian population. Liver Int 28(6):835–9 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01700.x.
- 28.
Kim SH, Kim SH, Yoon HJ, Shin DH, Park SS, et al.. (2010) GSTT1 and GSTM1 null mutations and adverse reactions induced by antituberculosis drugs in Koreans. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 90((1):): p. 39–43.
- 29.
Teixeira RL, Morato RG, Cabello PH, Muniz LM, Moreira Ada S, et al.. (2011) Genetic polymorphisms of NAT2, CYP2E1 and GST enzymes and the occurrence of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis in Brazilian TB patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106((6):): p. 716–24.
- 30.
Chatterjee S, Lyle N, Mandal A, Kundu S (2010) GSTT1 and GSTM1 gene deletions are not associated with hepatotoxicity caused by antitubercular drugs. J Clin Pharm Ther 35((4):): p. 465–70.
- 31.
Tostmann A, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE, de Lange WC, van der Ven AJ, et al.. (2008) Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: concise up-to-date review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(2): p. 192–202.
- 32. Uetrecht J, Naisbitt DJ (2013) Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: current concepts. Pharmacol Rev 65(2):779–808 doi:https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.113.007450.
- 33. Neville KA, Becker ML, Goldman JL, Kearns GL (2011) Developmental pharmacogenomics. Paediatr Anaesth 21(3):255–65 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03533.x.
- 34. Becker ML, Leeder JS (2010) Identifying genomic and developmental causes of adverse drug reactions in children. Pharmacogenomics 11(11):1591–602 doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.10.146.
- 35. Verhagen LM, Coenen MJ, López D, García JF, de Waard JH, et al. (2014) Full-gene sequencing analysis of NAT2 and its relationship with isoniazid pharmacokinetics in Venezuelan children with tuberculosis. Pharmacogenomics 15(3):285–96 doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.13.230.
- 36.
Vieira I, Sonnier M, Cresteil T (1996) Developmental expression of CYP2E1 in the human liver. Hypermethylation control of gene expression during the neonatal period. Eur J Biochem 238((2):): p. 476–83.
- 37.
Johnsrud EK, Koukouritaki SB, Divakaran K, Brunengraber LL, Hines RN, et al.. (2003) Human hepatic CYP2E1 expression during development. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 307((1):): p. 402–7.
- 38.
Wang T, Yu HT, Wang W, Pan YY, He LX, et al.. (2010) Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase associated with antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in Chinese tuberculosis patients. J Int Med Res 38((3):): p. 977–86.
- 39. Xiang Y, Ma L, Wu W, Liu W, Li Y, et al. (2014) The incidence of liver injury in Uyghur patients treated for TB in Xinjiang Uyghur autonomous region, China, and its association with hepatic enzyme polymorphisms nat2, cyp2e1, gstm1 and gstt1. PLoS One 9(1):e85905 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085905.
- 40. Rana SV, Sharma SK, Ola RP, Kamboj JK, Malik A, et al. (2014) N-acetyltransferase 2, cytochrome P4502E1 and glutathione S-transferase genotypes in antitubercular treatment-induced hepatotoxicity in North Indians. J Clin Pharm Ther 39(1):91–6 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12105.
- 41.
Gupta VH, Singh M, Amarapurkar DN, Sasi P, Joshi JM, et al.. (2013) Association of GST null genotypes with anti-tuberculosis drug induced hepatotoxicity in Western Indian population. Ann Hepatol 12((6):): p. 959–65.
- 42. Monteiro TP, El-Jaick KB, Jeovanio-Silva AL, Brasil PE, Costa MJ, et al. (2012) The roles of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and other predictors in anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury. J Clin Pharm Ther 37(6):712–8 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01368.x.