DNA Logic Gate Based on Metallo-Toehold Strand Displacement

Wei Deng; Huaguo Xu; Wei Ding; Haojun Liang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111650

Abstract

DNA is increasingly being used as an ideal material for the construction of nanoscale structures, circuits, and machines. Toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement reactions play a very important role in these enzyme-free constructions. In this study, the concept of metallo-toehold was utilized to further develop a mechanism for strand displacement driven by Ag⁺ ions, in which the intercalation of cytosine–cytosine mismatched base pairs on the toeholds provides additional control by varying of the concentration of Ag⁺ ions. The characteristics of displacement reaction in response to different concentration of Ag⁺ ions are investigated by fluorescence spectral and non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The reaction can successfully occur when the concentration of Ag⁺ ions is suitabe; excess Ag⁺ ions block the reaction. Furthermore, the displacement reaction can be tuned and controlled most efficiently under the condition of two C:C mismatched base pairs placed on the six-nt toehold. Based on our research, a mechanism was developed to construct Boolean logic gate AND and OR by employing strand displacement reaction as a tool, Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ as input.

Citation: Deng W, Xu H, Ding W, Liang H (2014) DNA Logic Gate Based on Metallo-Toehold Strand Displacement. PLoS ONE 9(11): e111650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650

Editor: Gayle E. Woloschak, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States of America

Received: July 5, 2014; Accepted: September 30, 2014; Published: November 3, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Deng et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: Funding provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 20934004 and 91127046) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2012CB821500 and 2010CB934500). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study or in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The remarkable specificity and strength of interactions between complementary nucleotides make DNA a useful material [1] for structuring nanoscale device [2]–[4], circuits [5], [6], and machines [7], [8]. Recently, the concept of toehold-mediated DNA strand displace- ment first used by Yurke [9] attracted a lot of interest, which occurs when hybridization of an invading strand starts at a short single strand attached to another single-stranded sticky end called as “toehold” domain of a double-stranded complex, resulting in a branch migration reaction [10] that the invading strand displaces the target strand from the double-stranded complex along with the production of a new complex with the help of a short sequence of contiguous complementary bases. This concept has been proved to be a powerful tool that allows control over the building of nucleic acid tweezers [11], DNA walkers [12], molecular gears [13] as well as the constructing of DNA-based logic gates [14]. Moreover, the Winfree group reported that toehold-mediated strand displacement can be applied to the construction of entropy-driven catalytic circuit reactions [15], digital logic circuit [16], and neural network computation [17]. The kinetics of DNA strand displacement has also been elaborately studied [18]. In previous papers, we also revealed a strategy for the assembly and logic operation of gold nanoparticles driven by a dynamic DNA-fueled molecular machine [19].

Research on interactions between metal ions and nucleic acids has gained increasing widespread attention [20], [21]. When hydrogen-bonded Watson–Crick base pairs are replaced by metal–ligand interactions inside the DNA double helix, a “metallo-base pair” is formed and stabilized through coordination of the ions to the oligonucleotides in certain way [20], [22]–[24]. Certain metal ions can be coordinated by specially designed ligand nucleosides, placed opposite each other in the double helix [25]–[29]. The Ono and Togashi groups have done a lot of innovative work in this area and obtained a series of achievements [30]–[32]. They have reported that T-T and C-C mispairs can specifically capture Hg²⁺ ions and Ag⁺ ions respectively [33]. As metal-base pairs are highly selective and sensitive for specific metal ions, extremely wide range of applications such as DNA sensor for detecting metal ions [34], DNA detection triggered by metal ions [35], construction of DNA nanomachine and nanodevice [36], and fabrication of molecular-scale logic gate [37]–[39], have been widely developed.

Although it has achieved successful applications, the studies of metallo-base pairs have been primarily focused on the sensors with sensitive responses functioned through the interactions between ions and oligonucleotides. Meanwhile, large amount of applications of toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement have almost been focused on pure DNA systems. Controlling the binding strength of the toehold domain can tune the rate of DNA hybridization reaction, but fine adjustment is difficult because the rate varies roughly exponentially with the binding strength [18]. Adjustment is neither convenient through the mechanism of “remote” toeholds presented by the Turberfield group because of the requirement to design many different length DNA to obtain fine result [40].

In a previous paper, we introduced the concept of ‘‘metallo-toeholds’’ in which the toehold domains feature T:T mismatched bases. We demonstrated that the reaction rates can be tuned and controlled dynamically at room temperature through variation of the concentration of Hg²⁺ ions [41]. Recently, displacement reaction triggered by functional toeholds formed such as ions [42] and micromolecule [43], has also been investigated. Herein we further utilize the concept of ‘‘metallo-toeholds’’ in which the toehold domains feature C:C mismatched bases. As expected, this system can be triggered by Ag⁺ ions. We explore the effects of the length of toehold, the numbers of cytosine-cytosine mismatched, and the concentration of Ag⁺ ions on the control of strand displacement reaction. Moreover, a mechanism was further developed for constructing Boolean logic gate AND and OR by employing strand displacement reaction as a tool, Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ as input.

Results and Discussion

Mechanism of Ag⁺–toehold DNA strand displacement

The software NUPACK [44] was used to carefully design the experimental DNA sequences such that they would possess minimal unwanted secondary structures. All sequences we used are listed in Table S1. As illustrated in Fig. 1, when Ag⁺ is introduced, the Input-oligomer firstly displaces the Signal strand on the Target complex through a toehold-mediated strand displacement, synchronously generating a New complex and releasing the Signal strand. Fluorescence experiments with the use of an additional fluorescence reporter complex was performed. When the input-oligomer and Ag⁺ ions were added to trigger the reaction, the Signal strand undergoes further reaction with the reporter complex, separating the fluorophore from the quencher, thereby inducing an increase in the fluorescence signal. Therefore, the progress of the strand displacement reaction can be observed by measuring the fluorescence intensity. The influence of Ag(I) ions on the fluorophore-labeled oligomer is negligible compared to the quencher (Fig. S1, ESI†).

Download:

Figure 1. Schematic representation of DNA strand displacement triggered by Ag⁺ ions and fluorosence measurements strategy.

F denotes ROX fluorophore, Q denotes BHQ-2 quencher. The reporter complex reacts stoichiometrically with the product Signal to induce an increase in fluorescence intensity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g001

Spectrfluorimetry studies

To systematically characterize the status of metallo-toehold DNA strand displacement reaction, typical fluorescence spectral characteristics of the reactions in response to different concentration of Ag⁺ ions after 24 h was performed. First, the experiment in the condition of six-nt toehold with two mismatched site was performed and analyzed. As revealed in Fig. 2, in the absence of Ag⁺ ions, the fluoroscence intensity was relatively low, because two cytosine–cytosine mismatches in the six-nt toeholds between Input-oligoner and Substrate weaken the binding strength, therefore, toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement reaction didn't occur successfully. The fluoroscence intensity increased along with the concentration of Ag⁺ ions increasing to 20×. It is inferred that, in the presence of Ag⁺ ions, Ag⁺ ions inserted into the C:C mismatched base pair to form C–Ag(I)–C structure, similarly to normal base pair, therefore, producing the appearance of a completely complementary toehold, which induced the metallo-toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement to release the Signal strand, which separated the fluorophore from the quencher and, therefore, enhanced the fluorescence signal. The fluorescence signal decreased significantly at higher concentrations of Ag⁺ ions; the transition concentration of Ag⁺ ions was nearly at 50×. When the concentration of Ag⁺ ions was greater than 100×, the fluorescence intensity was even far less than that with the absence of Ag⁺ ions which showed that the displacement reaction was badly blocked. It is supposed that because of special interaction between Ag⁺ ions and cytosine, when the Ag⁺ ions are excessive, the cytosine base is blocked by excess Ag⁺ ions, thereby, the displacement reaction is disrupted. The shapes and intensity of the signals the fluorescence spectra in response to the Ag⁺ ions after 48 h (Fig. S2, ESI†) was similar to those in Fig. 2. Besides, the fluorescence intensity after 48 h was only slightly higher than that after 24 h. In other words, equilibria achieved almost completely within 24 h for the reaction. Thus, a suitable range of concentration of Ag⁺ ions successfully triggered the metallo-toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement reaction. Moreover, the reaction can be tuned through variation of the concentrations of the Ag⁺ ions.

Download:

Figure 2. Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 24 h.

Final concentration: [Target complex] = 100 nM; [Fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM; [Input-oligomer] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g002

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)

Fig. 3 displays gel electrophoresis images obtained for the strand displacement reaction triggered by a concentration gradient of Ag⁺ ions after 24 h. As expected, a completely complementary metallo-toehold consist of C–Ag(I)–C structure triggered by a suitable concentration range of Ag⁺ ions obviously promoted the strand displacement. Notably, the reaction can be well tuned through regulating the concentration of Ag⁺ ions. Mismatched base pairs on the toehold between Input-oligomer and Substrate induced an obstacle in toehold binding, which played a key role in initiating strand displacement, thereby, slowed down the reaction. The intercalation of Ag⁺ ions made the metallo-toeholds perfect complementary, which drived the strand displacement successfully. Excessive Ag⁺ ions presumably blocked the cytosine sites on the toehold, and then impeded the reaction. Focused on Fig. 3(a), the reaction capacity was increasingly becoming powerful along with the concentration of Ag⁺ ions rising to 40×; however, the reaction started to be impeded at 50×, this was an obvious transition point for the reaction. Moreover, a suitable concentration range of Ag⁺ ions for preferably promoting metallo-toehold DNA strand displacement was about from 10× to 40×. Once the Ag⁺ ions were more than 100-fold excess in Fig. 3(b), the strand displacement reaction was badly hindered. The above discussion reveald that the PAGE data are in good agreement with those from the fluorescence spectra.

Download:

Figure 3. Gel electrophoresis images of the strand displacement reaction triggered by Ag⁺ ions, obtained after 24 h.

Lane M: Ladder size markers. The number above each lane represents the relative concentration of Ag⁺ ions to the target complex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g003

Influences of only one C:C mismatched on the toehold

We further explored the influences of different toehold lengths including five-nt, six-nt, and seven-nt, and the C:C mismatched numbers including one, two. The sequences used in this section are listed in Table S1. To distinguish different DNA strand, we defined the name of DNA as in Table S1.

Fluorescence spectral was performed to monitor the characteristic of the reactions in response to the condition of only one C:C mismatched with different length toehold of the Input-oligomer at different concentration of Ag⁺ ions. Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b displays the fluorescence spectral of the reaction that there was only one mismatched on five-nt toehold of In5-1 m and In5-3 m triggered by a concentration gradient of Ag⁺ ions after 24 h. Unexpectedly, the strand displacement reaction completed with five-nt toehold whether the C:C mismatched are placed on either site of the toehold at relative low concentration of Ag⁺ ions, the reaction speeded up slightly along with the increase of Ag⁺ ions; but 100-fold excess Ag⁺ ions obviously impeded the reaction, which was a transition point. The DNA strand displacement reaction rate is positively associated to the length of toehold [18]. Therefore, in the condition of six-nt and seven-nt toehold of Input-oligomer, the reaction more completely occured as expected (Figs. S3 and S4, ESI†); and the transition piont was the same as previously mentioned. To sum up. the strand displacement reaction can not be effectively tuned and controlled under the condition of only one C:C mismatched placed on the toehold which length was from five-nt to seven-nt. Fig. 4c displays gel electrophoresis images of the strand displacement reaction triggered by Ag⁺ ions for only one C:C mismatched on different site at five-nt toehold, obtained after 24 h. As shown, the DNA displacement reaction was close to complete at low concentration of Ag⁺ ions; the reaction appeared to be impeded at 100-fold excess Ag⁺ ions. The PAGE data are in fairly good agreement with those from the fluorescence spectra. Accordingly, we infer that when the concentration of Ag⁺ ions is low, only one mismatched on the toehold does not have reamarkable influence on the binding ability of toehold when the length of toehold is long enough, thus, the strand displacement reaction is neither influenced observably by only one mismatched on the toehold.

Download:

Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 24 h.

Final concentration: [target complex] = 100 nM; [fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM. Target complex consists of Signal and S5-1,3. (a) [In5-1 m] = 400 nM. (b) [In5-3 m] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex]. (c) Gel electrophoresis images of strand displacement reaction triggered by Ag⁺ ions, obtained after 24 h. Except for the lane M, that first 4 lanes correspond to In5-1 m and the last four correspond to In5-3 m respectively. The number above each lane represents the relative concentration of Ag⁺ ions to the target complex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g004

Influences of two C:C mismatched on the toehold

Fig. 5 displays fluorescence spectral of the reaction that there was two C:C mismatched on five-nt and seven-nt toehold of Input-oligomer triggered by Ag⁺ ions after 24 h. Compared with Fig. 1, the shapes of the signals was similar; besides, the rule of fluorescence signal varied which increased at the beginning and then decreased along with the increasing concentration of Ag⁺ ions was also similar. However, the maximum fluorescence signal at 20× was much less than that in Fig. 1, showing that the binding ability of five-nt toehold with two C:C mismatched was weaker than that of six-nt toehold with two C:C mismatched, inducing that the strand displacement reaction at the equilibrium point did not completely occur at the optimum concentration of Ag⁺ ions. Moreover, the difference of signal intensity between a suitable concentration range of Ag⁺ ions was too small to distinguish clearly. As revealed in Fig. 5(b), the strand diplacement reaction almost entirely occured when the concentration of Ag⁺ ions was less than 50×; as expected, the reaction was prevented when the concentration of Ag⁺ ions was more than 10 µM, which is equal to 100-fold excess. In conclusion, the strand displacement reaction can not be tuned and controlled efficiently under the condition of two C:C mismatched placed on the five-nt toehold and seven-nt toehold. To verify the effect of excess Ag⁺ ions, fluorescence spectral for introducing completely complementary strand of Substrate severed as Input-oligomer was also performed in Fig. 5(c). Visibly, normal DNA strand displacement reaction almost unaffected by Ag⁺ ions which shows that excessive Ag⁺ ions almost have no influences on the formation of normal base-pair. Hereby, the conclusion can be obtained that when Ag⁺ ions is extremely excessive, the cytosine base will be surrounded even wrapped by excess Ag⁺ ions, thus, the formation of C–Ag(I)–C structure will be blocked, thus, the DNA strand displacement reaction will also be predictably prevented.

Download:

Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 24 h.

Final concentration: [target complex] = 100 nM; [fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM; [Input-oligomer] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex]. (a) Target complex is consist of Signal and S5-1, 3; In5-1,3 severs as Input-oligomer. (b) Target complex is consist of Signal and S7-1,3; In7-1,3 severs as Input-oligomer. (c) The completely complementary strand of substrate severs as input-oligomer, all other chains are the same as in Fig. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g005

Development of “AND” and “OR” logic gates

According to our research and the influences of the toehold length on DNA displacement [45], a simple and universal logic system were developed where Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ ions worked as the input and fluorescence intensity worked as the output. Both one C:C and one T:T mismatch base pair, which can be specifically inserted by Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ ions respectively, were introduced on the toehold for the design of logic operation. The inputs are Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺, with the absence and presence of each ion defined as “0” and “1”, respectively. To more intuitively express the output, a value (F–F₀)/F₀ (F0 and F represent the fluorescence intensity of the system in the absence and presence of metal ions, respectively) was employed as output, if the value is higher than 1, the output is defined as “1”, and the others were defined as “0”.

Fig. 6a reveals the design of “AND” logic gate with metal ions inputs. In the absence of either or both inputs, there are at least one mismatch base pairs placed on five-nt toehold, weakening the binding strength of toehold, so DNA displacement will be impeded. Only in the presence of both inputs, the toehold is completely complementary in appearance because Ag⁺ ions and Hg²⁺ ions can insert into and stabilize C–C and T–T mismatch base pairs, thereby, the DNA displacement can successfully occur, leading to increase the fluorescence intensity. A truth table is shown in Fig. 6b. Fig. 6c reveals the fluorescence intensity of “AND” logic gate with metal ions inputs. In the absence of both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ inputs (0,0), or in the presence of either Ag⁺ (1,0), or Hg²⁺ input (0,1), the fluorescence intensity was relatively weak. Only in the presence of both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ (1,1) caused great increase of fluorescence intensity. The value of (F–F₀)/F₀ were calculated in Fig. 6d. It shows that only under the input (1,1) the value was higher than 1, which corresponded to the true output; the value of other inputs were all smaller than 1, which corresponded to the false output. PAGE gel electrophoresis was performed to qualitatively test the design of “AND” logic gate (Fig. S5). Obviously, only in the presence of both inputs (1,1), the Signal band was clearly visible which shows that the DNA displacement occurred successfully, that is to say, only the (1,1) input obtained a output 1, other inputs obtained a output 0. The PAGE result is in good agreement with that from the fluorescence spectra.

Download:

Figure 6. The ‘AND’ logic gate system using Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺ as inputs while the enhancement of fluorescence intensity as output.

(a) The design of the logic gate. (b) The truth table of the logic gate. (c) The resultant fluorescence spectra of different input states. (d) Values of (F–F₀)/F₀ respond to different input states.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g006

Fig. 7a reveals the design of “OR” logic gate with metal ions inputs. In the absence of both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ inputs, there are two mismatch base pairs placed on six-nt toehold, which means that the toehold binding strength was weak, thereby, the DNA displacement will be blocked. In the presence of either or both input, one of two mismatch base pairs can be stabilized by the formation of C–Ag–C or T–Hg–T, so the binding ability between toeholds are strong enough to trigger the DNA displacement, thereby, inducing the enhancement of fluorescence intensity. A truth table is shown in Fig. 7b. Fig. 7c reveals the fluorescence intensity of “OR” logic gate with metal ions inputs. In the absence of both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ inputs (0,0), the fluorescence intensity was much weaker than others; while in the presence of either Ag⁺ (1,0), or Hg²⁺ (0,1) input, or both inputs (1,1), the fluorescence intensity increased greatly. The value of (F–F₀)/F₀ were calculated in Fig. 7d. It can obviously seen that only the absence of both inputs obtained a false output, while the presence of either input or both inputs obtained a true output. The fluorescence intensity of (1,0) input was visibly smaller than that of (0,1) input because that the binding affinity of C–Ag–C is weaker than that of T–Hg–T [21]. PAGE gel electrophoresis was also performed to qualitatively test the design of “OR” logic gate (Fig. S6). Except for the (0,0) input, the Signal band was clearly visible in all other inputs which shows that the DNA displacement occurred successfully, that is to say, only the (0,0) input obtained a output 0, other inputs obtained a output 1. The PAGE result is in good agreement with that from the fluorescence spectra.

Download:

Figure 7. The ‘AND’ logic gate system using Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺ as inputs while the enhancement of fluorescence intensity as output.

(a) The design of the logic gate. (b) The truth table of the logic gate. (c) The resultant fluorescence spectra of different input states. (d) Values of (F–F₀)/F₀ respond to different input states.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.g007

Conclusions

In summary, the concept of metallo-toeholds is utilized to further propose a mechanism that Ag⁺ ions which specifically insert into mismatched base pair (C:C) to form C–Ag(I)–C structure can be used to trigger the DNA strand displacement reaction. The Ag⁺ ions serve as a regulator, and can tune the DNA strand displacement reaction through metallo-toehold. Through detailed discussions on the influences of toehold length and C:C mismatched numbers on the toehold, we confirmed that the strand displacement reaction can be tuned and controlled most efficiently under the condition of two C:C mismatched placed on a six-nt toehold. By introducing the completely complementary strand, we clarified that excessive Ag⁺ ions obstructed the dis- placement reaction. Moreover, a mechanism for constructing Boolean logic gate AND and OR by employing strand displacement reaction as a tool, Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ as input is deveploed. Besides, such logic gates work well. It has been reported that other metal ions, such as Cu²⁺ and Ni²⁺, can specifically interact with nucleoside bases to form metal-ion-mediated base pairs [46], [47]. Therefore, our strategy extends the application between metal ions and nucleic acids. Moreover, this strategy can be further used to construct new logic gate with other metal ions as input and complicated logic circuits. We hope that the concept of metallo-toehold formed by metal ions (e.g., Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺) can be further used in DNA nanotechnology.

Materials and Methods

Materials

All DNA oligomer sequences used in this study were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology (Shanghai, China), all non-modification oligomer purified by UltraPAGE, the modification oligomer of fluorophores and quencher purified by HPLC. The DNA sequences tested in Scheme 1 are presented in Table S1. All other sequence are presented in Table S1. Tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Tris), anhydrous sodium acetate (NaOAc), magnesium acetate tetrahydrate [Mg(OAc)₂], potassium nitrate (KNO₃), silver(I) nitrate (AgNO₃) were purchased from Sinapharm Chemical Reagent (Shanghai, China). Mercury(II) nitrate (Hg(NO₃)₂) was obtained from Wanshan Mineral Products Company (Tongren, Guizhou, China). All salts were of analytical grade and used without further purification. The oligomer samples were dissolved in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HOAc, 200 mM NaOAc, 0.005 M Mg(OAc)₂, and 0.03 M KNO₃ at pH 7.4 [48]. The concentrations of the oligonucleotide solutions were quantified by measuring the UV absorbance at 260 nm. Unless otherwise stated, all other reagents were of analytical reagent grade and used without further purification or treatment. Ultrapure water (Milli-Q plus, Millipore, Bedford, MA) was used throughout. The DNA complex required prior annealing treatment. All annealing processes were performed using a dry bath (ABSON, USA). The samples were heated at 95°C, equilibrated for 15 min at this temperature, and then slowly cooled to 20°C at a constant rate over the course of 90 min.

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)

Non-denaturing PAGE was run on 20% acrylamide (19∶1 acrylamide:bis), diluted from 40% acrylamide stock purchased from Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology (Shanghai, China); 6× glycerol was used as the loading buffer, was added in 0.2× stochiometry to all samples. Gels were run at 100 V for 200 min at 25°C. Gels were stained 15 min with GelRed, purchased from Biotium (catalog number 41003), then scanned with a Gel Image System (Tanon 1600).

Spectrofluorimetry studies

Spectrofluorimetry studies were carried out with a commercial SPEX Fluorolog-3 (Jobin Yvon S.A.S, France). The excitation of ROX fluorophre was at 588 nm, and emission was at 608 nm. In all spectrofluorimetry experiments, the total reaction volume was 200 µL. Both the excitation and emission slit widths were set to 2.5 nm, with an integration time of 0.5 second for obtaining smooth curves. Prior to each experiment, all cuvettes were cleaned thoroughly: each cuvette was washed ten times in ultrapure water, another three times in absolute ethanol, and then was flushed with a constant stream of dry nitrogen gas to avoid water condensation.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Fluorescence spectra of fluorophore-labeled oligomer in the presence of Ag(I) ions and the quencher-labeled oligomer. Initial concentrations: [fluorophore-labeled oligomer] = 100 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[fluorophore-labeled oligomer].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 48 h. Final concentration: [Target complex] = 100 nM; [Fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM; [Input-oligomer] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 24 h. Final concentration: [Target complex] = 100 nM; [Fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM. Target complex consists of Signal and S6-1,3. (a) [In6-1 m] = 400 nM (b) [In6-3 m] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex]. (c) Gel electrophoresis images of the strand displacement reaction triggered by Ag⁺ ions, obtained after 24 h. Except for the lane M, that first 4 lanes correspond to In6-1 m and the last four correspond to In6-3 m respectively. The number above each lane represents the relative concentration of Ag⁺ ions to the target complex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Fluorescence spectra of the reactions after treatment with Ag⁺ ions for 24 h. Final concentration: [Target complex] = 100 nM; [Fluorescence reporter complex] = 150 nM. Target complex consists of Signal and S7-1,3. (a) [In7-1 m] = 400 nM (b) [In7-3 m] = 400 nM. The number in the figure represented the ratio [Ag⁺]/[Target complex]. (c) Gel electrophoresis images of the strand displacement reaction triggered by Ag⁺ ions, obtained after 24 h. Except for the lane M, that first 4 lanes correspond to In7-1 m and the last four correspond to In7-3 m respectively. The number above each lane represents the relative concentration of Ag⁺ ions to the target complex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Gel electrophoresis images of “AND” logic gate. Lane M: Ladder size markers, Lane T: Target complex, Lane S: Signal. (0,0) (1,0) (0,1) (1,1) represent different inputs corresponding to no ions input, Ag⁺ ions input, Hg²⁺ ions input and both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ ions inputs, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s005

(TIF)

Figure S6.

Gel electrophoresis images of “OR” logic gate. Lane M: Ladder size markers, Lane T: Target complex, Lane S: Signal. (0,0) (1,0) (0,1) (1,1) represent different inputs corresponding to no ions input, Ag⁺ ions input, Hg²⁺ ions input and both Ag⁺ and Hg²⁺ ions inputs, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s006

(TIF)

Table S1.

DNA sequence tested in the schematic. Bold domain sequences represent the metallo-toehold. Bases in italics formed C:C mismatched base pairs that allowed insertion of a Ag(I) ion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111650.s007

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Wei Deng Wei Ding HL. Performed the experiments: Wei Deng HX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Wei Deng HX. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Wei Deng HL.

References

1. Seeman NC (2003) DNA in a material world. Nature 421: 427–431.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Rothemund PW (2006) Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440: 297–302.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Winfree E, Liu FR, Wenzler LA, Seeman NC (1998) Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nature 394: 539–544.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. He Y, Ye T, Su M, Zhang C, Ribbe AE, et al. (2008) Hierarchical self-assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedra. Nature 452: 198–201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Seelig G, Soloveichik D, Zhang DY, Winfree E (2006) Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits. Science 314: 1585–1588.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Stojanovic MN, Semova S, Kolpashchikov D, Macdonald J, Morgan C, et al. (2005) Deoxyribozyme-based ligase logic gates and their initial circuits. J Am Chem Soc 127: 6914–6915.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Bath J, Turberfield AJ (2007) DNA nanomachines. Nat Nanotechnol 2: 275–284.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Bath J, Green SJ, Turberfield AJ (2005) A free-running DNA motor powered by a nicking enzyme. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 4358–4361.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Yurke B, Turberfield AJ, Mills AP, Simmel FC, Neumann JL (2000) A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature 406: 605–608.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Panyutin IG, Hsieh P (1994) The Kinetics of Spontaneous DNA Branch Migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 8: A1395–A1395.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Seeman NC (2005) From genes to machines: DNA nanomechanical devices. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 119–125.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Nutiu R, Li YF (2005) A DNA-protein nanoengine for “On-Demand” release and precise delivery of molecules. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 5464–5467.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Tian Y, Mao CD (2004) Molecular gears: A pair of DNA circles continuously rolls against each other. J Am Chem Soc 126: 11410–11411.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Elbaz J, Wang ZG, Orbach R, Willner I (2009) pH-Stimulated Concurrent Mechanical Activation of Two DNA “Tweezers”. A “SET-RESET” Logic Gate System. Nano Lett 9: 4510–4514.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Zhang DY, Turberfield AJ, Yurke B, Winfree E (2007) Engineering entropy-driven reactions and networks catalyzed by DNA. Science 318: 1121–1125.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Qian L, Winfree E (2011) Scaling Up Digital Circuit Computation with DNA Strand Displacement Cascades. Science 332: 1196–1201.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Qian L, Winfree E, Bruck J (2011) Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Nature 475: 368–372.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Zhang DY, Winfree E (2009) Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J Am Chem Soc 131: 17303–17314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Song T, Liang H (2012) Synchronized assembly of gold nanoparticles driven by a dynamic DNA-fueled molecular machine. J Am Chem Soc 134: 10803–10806.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Clever GH, Kaul C, Carell T (2007) DNA–metal base pairs. Angew Chem Int Ed 46: 6226–6236.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Ono A, Torigoe H, Tanaka Y, Okamoto I (2011) Binding of metal ions by pyrimidine base pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Soc Rev 40: 5855–5866.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Clever GH, Shionoya M (2010) Metal–base pairing in DNA. Coord Chem Rev 254: 2391–2402.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Lee JS, Latimer LJP, Reid RS (1993) A Cooperative Conformational Change in Duplex DNA Induced by Zn²⁺ and Other Divalent Metal-Ions. Biochem Cell Biol 71: 162–168.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Aich P, Labiuk SL, Tari LW, Delbaere LJT, Roesler WJ, et al. (1999) M-DNA: A complex between divalent metal ions and DNA which behaves as a molecular wire. J Mol Biol 294: 477–485.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Urata H, Yamaguchi E, Nakamura Y, Wada S (2011) Pyrimidine-pyrimidine base pairs stabilized by silver(I) ions. Chem Commun 47: 941–943.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. He X, Qing Z, Wang K, Zou Z, Shi H, et al. (2012) Engineering a unimolecular multifunctional DNA probe for analysis of Hg ²⁺ and Ag⁺. Anal Methods 4: 345–347.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Wang Y, Zheng Y, Yang F, Yang X (2012) Dual polarisation interferometry for real-time, label-free detection of interaction of mercury(II) with mercury-specific oligonucleotides. Chem Commun 48: 2873–2875.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Kanayama N, Takarada T, Fujita M, Maeda M (2013) DNA terminal breathing regulated by metal ions for colloidal logic gates. Chemistry 19: 10794–10798.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Xiao Z, Guo X, Ling L (2013) Sequence-specific recognition of double-stranded DNA with molecular beacon with the aid of Ag(+) under neutral pH environment. Chem Commun 49: 3573–3575.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Ono A, Togashi H (2004) Highly selective oligonucleotide-based sensor for mercury(II) in aqueous solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed 43: 4300–4302.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Ono A, Cao S, Togashi H, Tashiro M, Fujimoto T, et al.. (2008) Specific interactions between silver(I) ions and cytosine-cytosine pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Commun: 4825–4827.
32. Torigoe H, Miyakawa Y, Ono A, Kozasa T (2012) Positive cooperativity of the specific binding between Hg²⁺ ion and T:T mismatched base pairs in duplex DNA. Thermochim Acta 532: 28–35.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Ono A, Torigoe H, Tanaka Y, Okamoto I (2011) Binding of metal ions by pyrimidine base pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Soc Rev 40: 5855–5866.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Lin ZZ, Li XH, Kraatz HB (2011) Impedimetric Immobilized DNA-Based Sensor for Simultaneous Detection of Pb²⁺, Ag⁺, and Hg²⁺. Anal Chem 83: 6896–6901.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Graf N, Goritz M, Kramer R (2006) A metal-ion-releasing probe for DNA detection by catalytic signal amplification. Angew Chem Int Ed 45: 4013–4015.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Wang ZG, Elbaz J, Willner I (2011) DNA Machines: Bipedal Walker and Stepper. Nano Letters 11: 304–309.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Freeman R, Finder T, Willner I (2009) Multiplexed Analysis of Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺ Ions by Nucleic Acid Functionalized CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots and Their Use for Logic Gate Operations. Angew Chem Int Ed 48: 7818–7821.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Park KS, Jung C, Park HG (2010) “Illusionary” Polymerase Activity Triggered by Metal Ions: Use for Molecular Logic-Gate Operations. Angew Chem Int Ed 49: 9757–9760.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Zhang GY, Lin WL, Yang WQ, Lin ZY, Guo LH, et al. (2012) Logic gates for multiplexed analysis of Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺. Analyst 137: 2687–2691.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Genot AJ, Zhang DY, Bath J, Turberfield AJ (2011) Remote Toehold: A Mechanism for Flexible Control of DNA Hybridization Kinetics. J Am Chem Soc 133: 2177–2182.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Ding W, Deng W, Zhu H, Liang H (2013) Metallo-toeholds: controlling DNA strand displacement driven by Hg(ii) ions. Chem Commun 49: 9953–9955.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Tang W, Wang H, Wang D, Zhao Y, Li N, et al. (2013) DNA tetraplexes-based toehold activation for controllable DNA strand displacement reactions. J Am Chem Soc 135: 13628–13631.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Xu XW, Yang XR (2014) Reversion of DNA strand displacement with functional nucleic acids as toeholds. Chem Commun 50: 805–807.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Zadeh JN, Steenberg CD, Bois JS, Wolfe BR, Pierce MB, et al. (2011) NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem 32: 170–173.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Zhang DY, Winfree E (2009) Control of DNA Strand Displacement Kinetics Using Toehold Exchange. J Am Chem Soc 131: 17303–17314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Tanaka K, Tengeiji A, Kato T, Toyama N, Shionoya M (2003) A discrete self-assembled metal array in artificial DNA. Science 299: 1212–1213.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Switzer C, Sinha S, Kim PH, Heuberger BD (2005) A purine-like nickel(II) base pair for DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 1529–1532.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Lu N, Shao CY, Deng ZX (2009) Colorimetric Hg(2+) detection with a label-free and fully DNA-structured sensor assembly incorporating G-quadruplex halves. Analyst 134: 1822–1825.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Seeman NC (2003) DNA in a material world. Nature 421: 427–431.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Rothemund PW (2006) Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440: 297–302.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Winfree E, Liu FR, Wenzler LA, Seeman NC (1998) Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nature 394: 539–544.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. He Y, Ye T, Su M, Zhang C, Ribbe AE, et al. (2008) Hierarchical self-assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedra. Nature 452: 198–201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Seelig G, Soloveichik D, Zhang DY, Winfree E (2006) Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits. Science 314: 1585–1588.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Stojanovic MN, Semova S, Kolpashchikov D, Macdonald J, Morgan C, et al. (2005) Deoxyribozyme-based ligase logic gates and their initial circuits. J Am Chem Soc 127: 6914–6915.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Bath J, Turberfield AJ (2007) DNA nanomachines. Nat Nanotechnol 2: 275–284.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Bath J, Green SJ, Turberfield AJ (2005) A free-running DNA motor powered by a nicking enzyme. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 4358–4361.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Yurke B, Turberfield AJ, Mills AP, Simmel FC, Neumann JL (2000) A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature 406: 605–608.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Panyutin IG, Hsieh P (1994) The Kinetics of Spontaneous DNA Branch Migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 8: A1395–A1395.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Seeman NC (2005) From genes to machines: DNA nanomechanical devices. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 119–125.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Nutiu R, Li YF (2005) A DNA-protein nanoengine for “On-Demand” release and precise delivery of molecules. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 5464–5467.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Tian Y, Mao CD (2004) Molecular gears: A pair of DNA circles continuously rolls against each other. J Am Chem Soc 126: 11410–11411.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Elbaz J, Wang ZG, Orbach R, Willner I (2009) pH-Stimulated Concurrent Mechanical Activation of Two DNA “Tweezers”. A “SET-RESET” Logic Gate System. Nano Lett 9: 4510–4514.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Zhang DY, Turberfield AJ, Yurke B, Winfree E (2007) Engineering entropy-driven reactions and networks catalyzed by DNA. Science 318: 1121–1125.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Qian L, Winfree E (2011) Scaling Up Digital Circuit Computation with DNA Strand Displacement Cascades. Science 332: 1196–1201.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Qian L, Winfree E, Bruck J (2011) Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Nature 475: 368–372.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zhang DY, Winfree E (2009) Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J Am Chem Soc 131: 17303–17314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Song T, Liang H (2012) Synchronized assembly of gold nanoparticles driven by a dynamic DNA-fueled molecular machine. J Am Chem Soc 134: 10803–10806.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Clever GH, Kaul C, Carell T (2007) DNA–metal base pairs. Angew Chem Int Ed 46: 6226–6236.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Ono A, Torigoe H, Tanaka Y, Okamoto I (2011) Binding of metal ions by pyrimidine base pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Soc Rev 40: 5855–5866.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Clever GH, Shionoya M (2010) Metal–base pairing in DNA. Coord Chem Rev 254: 2391–2402.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Lee JS, Latimer LJP, Reid RS (1993) A Cooperative Conformational Change in Duplex DNA Induced by Zn²⁺ and Other Divalent Metal-Ions. Biochem Cell Biol 71: 162–168.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Aich P, Labiuk SL, Tari LW, Delbaere LJT, Roesler WJ, et al. (1999) M-DNA: A complex between divalent metal ions and DNA which behaves as a molecular wire. J Mol Biol 294: 477–485.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Urata H, Yamaguchi E, Nakamura Y, Wada S (2011) Pyrimidine-pyrimidine base pairs stabilized by silver(I) ions. Chem Commun 47: 941–943.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. He X, Qing Z, Wang K, Zou Z, Shi H, et al. (2012) Engineering a unimolecular multifunctional DNA probe for analysis of Hg ²⁺ and Ag⁺. Anal Methods 4: 345–347.
View Article
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Wang Y, Zheng Y, Yang F, Yang X (2012) Dual polarisation interferometry for real-time, label-free detection of interaction of mercury(II) with mercury-specific oligonucleotides. Chem Commun 48: 2873–2875.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Kanayama N, Takarada T, Fujita M, Maeda M (2013) DNA terminal breathing regulated by metal ions for colloidal logic gates. Chemistry 19: 10794–10798.
View Article
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Xiao Z, Guo X, Ling L (2013) Sequence-specific recognition of double-stranded DNA with molecular beacon with the aid of Ag(+) under neutral pH environment. Chem Commun 49: 3573–3575.
View Article
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Ono A, Togashi H (2004) Highly selective oligonucleotide-based sensor for mercury(II) in aqueous solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed 43: 4300–4302.
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Ono A, Cao S, Togashi H, Tashiro M, Fujimoto T, et al.. (2008) Specific interactions between silver(I) ions and cytosine-cytosine pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Commun: 4825–4827.

[ref32] 32. Torigoe H, Miyakawa Y, Ono A, Kozasa T (2012) Positive cooperativity of the specific binding between Hg²⁺ ion and T:T mismatched base pairs in duplex DNA. Thermochim Acta 532: 28–35.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Ono A, Torigoe H, Tanaka Y, Okamoto I (2011) Binding of metal ions by pyrimidine base pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem Soc Rev 40: 5855–5866.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lin ZZ, Li XH, Kraatz HB (2011) Impedimetric Immobilized DNA-Based Sensor for Simultaneous Detection of Pb²⁺, Ag⁺, and Hg²⁺. Anal Chem 83: 6896–6901.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Graf N, Goritz M, Kramer R (2006) A metal-ion-releasing probe for DNA detection by catalytic signal amplification. Angew Chem Int Ed 45: 4013–4015.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Wang ZG, Elbaz J, Willner I (2011) DNA Machines: Bipedal Walker and Stepper. Nano Letters 11: 304–309.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Freeman R, Finder T, Willner I (2009) Multiplexed Analysis of Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺ Ions by Nucleic Acid Functionalized CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots and Their Use for Logic Gate Operations. Angew Chem Int Ed 48: 7818–7821.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Park KS, Jung C, Park HG (2010) “Illusionary” Polymerase Activity Triggered by Metal Ions: Use for Molecular Logic-Gate Operations. Angew Chem Int Ed 49: 9757–9760.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Zhang GY, Lin WL, Yang WQ, Lin ZY, Guo LH, et al. (2012) Logic gates for multiplexed analysis of Hg²⁺ and Ag⁺. Analyst 137: 2687–2691.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Genot AJ, Zhang DY, Bath J, Turberfield AJ (2011) Remote Toehold: A Mechanism for Flexible Control of DNA Hybridization Kinetics. J Am Chem Soc 133: 2177–2182.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Ding W, Deng W, Zhu H, Liang H (2013) Metallo-toeholds: controlling DNA strand displacement driven by Hg(ii) ions. Chem Commun 49: 9953–9955.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Tang W, Wang H, Wang D, Zhao Y, Li N, et al. (2013) DNA tetraplexes-based toehold activation for controllable DNA strand displacement reactions. J Am Chem Soc 135: 13628–13631.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Xu XW, Yang XR (2014) Reversion of DNA strand displacement with functional nucleic acids as toeholds. Chem Commun 50: 805–807.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Zadeh JN, Steenberg CD, Bois JS, Wolfe BR, Pierce MB, et al. (2011) NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem 32: 170–173.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Zhang DY, Winfree E (2009) Control of DNA Strand Displacement Kinetics Using Toehold Exchange. J Am Chem Soc 131: 17303–17314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Tanaka K, Tengeiji A, Kato T, Toyama N, Shionoya M (2003) A discrete self-assembled metal array in artificial DNA. Science 299: 1212–1213.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Switzer C, Sinha S, Kim PH, Heuberger BD (2005) A purine-like nickel(II) base pair for DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 1529–1532.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Lu N, Shao CY, Deng ZX (2009) Colorimetric Hg(2+) detection with a label-free and fully DNA-structured sensor assembly incorporating G-quadruplex halves. Analyst 134: 1822–1825.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Results and Discussion

Mechanism of Ag+–toehold DNA strand displacement

Spectrfluorimetry studies

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)

Influences of only one C:C mismatched on the toehold

Influences of two C:C mismatched on the toehold

Development of “AND” and “OR” logic gates

Conclusions

Materials and Methods

Materials

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)

Spectrofluorimetry studies

Supporting Information

Author Contributions

References

Mechanism of Ag⁺–toehold DNA strand displacement