Correction
26 Mar 2015: The PLOS ONE Staff (2015) Correction: De Novo Assembly of the Common Bean Transcriptome Using Short Reads for the Discovery of Drought-Responsive Genes. PLOS ONE 10(3): e0119369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119369 View correction
Figures
Abstract
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important food legumes, far ahead of other legumes. The average grain yield of the common bean worldwide is much lower than its potential yields, primarily due to drought in the field. However, the gene network that mediates plant responses to drought stress remains largely unknown in this species. The major goals of our study are to identify a large scale of genes involved in drought stress using RNA-seq. First, we assembled 270 million high-quality trimmed reads into a non-redundant set of 62,828 unigenes, representing approximately 49 Mb of unique transcriptome sequences. Of these unigenes, 26,501 (42.2%) common bean unigenes had significant similarity with unigenes/predicted proteins from other legumes or sequenced plants. All unigenes were functionally annotated within the GO, COG and KEGG pathways. The strategy for de novo assembly of transcriptome data generated here will be useful in other legume plant transcriptome studies. Second, we identified 10,482 SSRs and 4,099 SNPs in transcripts. The large number of genetic markers provides a resource for gene discovery and development of functional molecular markers. Finally, we found differential expression genes (DEGs) between terminal drought and optimal irrigation treatments and between the two different genotypes Long 22-0579 (drought tolerant) and Naihua (drought sensitive). DEGs were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR assays, which indicated that these genes are functionally associated with the drought-stress response. These resources will be helpful for basic and applied research for genome analysis and crop drought resistance improvement in the common bean.
Citation: Wu J, Wang L, Li L, Wang S (2014) De Novo Assembly of the Common Bean Transcriptome Using Short Reads for the Discovery of Drought-Responsive Genes. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262
Editor: Zhong-Hua Chen, University of Western Sydney, Australia
Received: May 17, 2014; Accepted: September 4, 2014; Published: October 2, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Wu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All sequence data in the Short Read Archive (SRA) at the NCBI database under the project accession number SRR1523069.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Agriculture of China (the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-09]), National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013BAD01B03-18a) and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of CAAS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a legume native to America, is now one of the most important crops worldwide and plays an important role in solving food shortages in poor areas and adjusting the diet structure in developed countries. The global bean harvest is approximately 23 million tons, with Asia being the most important producing region with 14 million hectares, representing almost half of the global output in 2012 (FAO). However, the growth and production of the common bean are usually limited by many abiotic stresses, among which drought is the most complex and devastating on a global scale. Approximately 60% of common bean production occurs in agricultural land prone to water deficit, without irrigation systems, where unexpected drought periods result in losses that may reach up to 80% of yield reduction [1], [2]. Thus, improvement of drought resistance is a major goal for common bean breeders worldwide.
Drought is an increasingly important constraint of crop productivity and stability worldwide due to climate change. It is a physiologically complex trait and involves complex cross-talk between different regulatory levels, including adjustment of metabolism and gene expression for physiological and morphological adaptation. Previous studies are mainly focused on the traits related to drought resistance in the common bean, such as flower, seed filling, number of pods and seeds, seed weight and days to maturity [3], [4]. Traits associated with drought tolerance were identified and drought-tolerant germplasm that differed in rooting depth was identified [5]. In addition, common bean germplasm that exhibits improved levels of drought tolerance has been identified [6], [7]. Physiological analysis of common bean cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance [8].
Molecular markers are powerful tools to analyze the genetic control of complex traits such as diseases resistance, seed iron and drought tolerance [9], [10], [11]. A reliable genetic map was developed to analyze the inheritance of yield traits under drought and fully irrigated conditions over three years of experiments [9]. Until now, some drought tolerance quantitative trait loci (QTL) in common beans were identified, and they were mainly associated with yield components, phenology, canopy biomass dry weight, biomass partitioning indices, stem and seed total nonstructural carbohydrate content, leaf area index, and leaf chlorophyll content and rooting pattern traits instead of photosynthate remobilization traits [9], [12]–[15]. Drought-responsive genes were increasingly described in a number of plant reviews, such as P5CS, ADC, SPDS, ZMDREB2 and OSTPS1 [16]–[21]. However, there are few studies involving gene cloning and functional verification in the common bean. P5CS2 was isolated from the common bean and analyzed for genetic diversity [22], and a root-specific bZIP transcription factor is responsive to water deficit stress in the common bean [23]. However, the mechanisms underlying gene regulation in drought response remains elusive. In other words, drought tolerance is a cumulative process with stepwise changes in gene regulation. Therefore, the drought-induced response of the transitional landraces between drought-resistant and drought-susceptible plants may provide a better understanding of drought tolerance.
In recent years, high-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies such as Roche 454, Illumina, Solexa and ABI SOLiD have made it possible to generate gene resources at the whole genome level and to advance crop genetics and breeding with relatively low cost [24], [25]. Whole genome transcriptome analysis is an economical and effective way to exploit key factors for plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress that are involved in transcriptional and metabolic activities. These technologies have been effectively used to generate large-scale differentially expressed gene data in several plant species such as Millettia pinnata, cassava, hyacinth Bean, and Asian seabass [26]–[29]. Despite the common bean’s growing edible and economic importance, investigation at a comprehensive transcriptome level has been lacking. Here, we report the expression profiling of the two genotypes, Long 22-0579 (drought-tolerant) and Naihua (drought-sensitive), in response to drought stress, using RNA-seq to explore the potential candidate drought-responsive genes. The data obtained will serve as an invaluable genomic reference to further our knowledge about the common bean at the molecular level, and can be applied to molecular breeding for plants with enhanced drought tolerance.
Materials and Methods
Plant growth and drought treatments
In this study, we included improved cultivars of two gene pools: Andean and Mesoamerican (Table S1). Common bean cultivars, Long 22-0579 (drought-tolerant genotype) and Naihua (drought-sensitive genotype), were obtained from the National Gene Bank (China, Beijing). The seedlings were grown in plastic pots (23 cm×18 cm×18 cm) under a 14/10 h photoperiod at 25°C (day) and 20°C (night) in a greenhouse at the Institute of Crop Science, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (China, Beijing, 116°46′E, 39°92′N). The water content of each pot was measured three times a week, and the water lost was supplemented in the pots to keep equivalent levels according to treatment requirements. A completely random block design with two treatments, terminal drought and optimal irrigation was used. Twenty-five plants were used in each treatment. All pots were irrigated to field capacity until 4 weeks after seeding. For terminal drought treatment, watering was restricted to 25% of field capacity in the pot media from 5 weeks after seeding. For optimal irrigation, pots were kept to field capacity throughout the experiment.
Drought resistance index
Field experiments were carried out following the randomized complete block design with three replications for both control and drought stress conditions at the Institute of Crop Science, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (China, Beijing, 116°46′E, 39°92′N). Twenty-five seeds for each line were planted, with the distance of 20 cm between the plants within a plot, and 50 cm between adjacent plots. Grain production was determined harvesting plants from the central part of the rows of each cultivar, excepting two plants as a border at each end of the row. The drought resistance index (DRI) was calculated on the basis of a multiple regression of the grain yield of stressed and unstressed plants for each cultivar [30]. DRI for individual cultivars was computed as: DRI = YDS (YDS/YWW)/ where YDS is the grain yield obtained under unstressed per cultivar and YWW is the yield under stressed conditions.
is average grain yield obtained under unstressed all cultivars.
Sample collection and RNA preparation
The leaves were sampled when the leaves begin to wilt after the application of optimal irrigation and terminal drought treatment. Five leaves at the shoot apex were simultaneously collected from each individual plant and were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C prior to RNA extraction. The total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Tiangen, Beijing) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amount of total RNAs from fifteen plants were pooled for a single combined sample. In total, four combined samples were collected and denoted as LOI, LTD, NOI, and NTD according to cultivar (Long 22-0579 or Naihua) and the treatments (optimal irrigation or terminal drought) of their sampling sources. For each sample, at least 20 µg of total RNA was used for Illumina Hiseq 2500 sequencing conducted at the Beijing Berry Genomics company. All sequence data have been deposited in the Short Read Archive (SRA) at the NCBI database under the project accession number SRR1523069.
Sequences assembly
After sequencing, the raw sequence data were first purified by trimming adapter sequences and removing low-quality sequences. The resulting clean reads were assembled using the trinity software [31]. Trinity assembler was used with the inchworm k-mer method, and all of the server resources (stack size, CPU time, file size, data size, core dump size, memory usage, and virtual memory usage) were set to unlimited.
Data analysis
SSR identification and GC content analysis were performed using in-house perl scripts. The perl script program MISA (MIcroSAtellite; http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/) and SAMtools [32] was used for identification of SSRs and SNPs, respectively.
For assignments of gene descriptions, the all-unigenes were searched against the Nr database using BLASTx with an E-value cut-off of 10−5. Based on their annotations, the all-unigenes were assigned GO annotations using blast2GO, followed by functional classification using the WEGO software. Moreover, the putative metabolic pathways for the all-unigenes were assigned by performing BLASTx against the KEGG and COG pathway database with an E-value cut-off of 10−5. The RPKMs (reads per kilobase per million reads) were applied to measure the gene expression levels. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the optimal irrigation and terminal drought samples were identified using ‘DEGseq’. Four separate differential expression tests implemented by DEGseq and the corresponding significance thresholds used were likelihood ratio test (LRT), Fisher’s exact test (FET) and the MA-plot-based method with random sampling model (MARS) (p-value≤0.001) and fold-change threshold on the MA-plot (FC) log2 normalized fold change ≥2. The GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the DEGs were both performed by conducting hypergeometric tests with the whole common bean transcriptome set as the background.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
qRT-PCR was conducted using the common bean actin gene (EU369188.1) as the control. The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 1 µg of total RNAs using the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen). The gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier software (version 5.0). Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI PRISM 7300 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using 1 µl of first-strand cDNA and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TAKARA). All reactions were performed in triplicate. The relative expression levels for each gene were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method with normalization to the internal control.
Results
Comparison of drought tolerance between Long 22-0579 and Naihua
First, we evaluated drought resistance of one hundreds common bean cultivars by DRI value. According to the DRI values, cultivars Long 22-0579 and Naihua were the most contrasting (Table S2). Long 22-0579 in terms of yield under terminal drought was tolerant to optimal irrigation showed the highest DRI value (1.25) (Table S2). In contrast, Naihua which had the lowest seed yield under stress had lower DRI value (0.19) (Table S2). Based on screening experiments, we selected one drought-tolerant genotype (Long 22-0579) and one drought-sensitive genotype (Naihua). Further screening experiments revealed that the young seedling of the Naihua plants treated with terminal drought began to wilt after treatment. Meanwhile, the Long 22-0579 plants showed no symptoms during the course of the terminal drought treatments. These results indicate that the Long 22-0579 plants exhibit stronger drought tolerance than Naihua plants (Figure 1). Based on these results, these two genotypes (Long 22-0579 and Naihua) were chosen for RNA-seq.
Generation and assembly of transcript reads
To obtain a general overview of the common bean transcriptome and an initial comparison between drought-resistant and drought-susceptible bean transcripts, four libraries (LOI, LTD, NOI, and NTD) were constructed for paired end (PE) sequencing. The Illumina sequencing was then performed separately for four cDNA libraries and four sub-transcriptomes with 100-bp raw reads were generated. After filtration of low-quality and adapter sequences, a total of 54 055 718, 72 287 786, 71 518 270 and 72 100 736 raw reads were generated from the Illumina GAIIx sequencer, accounting for approximately 5.4 Gb, 7.2 Gb, 7.2 Gb and 7.2 Gb of sequence data for the library cultivars LOI, LTD, NOI, and NTD, respectively. These processed paired-end reads with high quality were used for further analysis (Table S3). In total, these clean reads constitute ∼27.0 GB of sequence data. The GC contents of raw reads were from approximately 45% to approximately 47%.
Nearly 270 million clean reads from LOI, LTD, NOI, and NTD sub-transcriptomes were assembled and 139,487 transcripts were obtained. The longest transcript length was 25,393 bp and the mean transcript length was 1,487 bp. The average GC content of the common bean transcript was 39.3%. Clustering resulted in 62,828 unigenes. The longest unigene length was 14,799 bp and the mean unigenes length was 777 bp (Table 1). Among these unigenes, 34,858 (55.5%) were from 200 bp to 500 bp, 13,062 (20.8%) were longer than 500 bp, 9,648 (15.4%) were longer than 1,000 bp, and 5,260 (8.4%) were longer than 2,000 bp. Figure S1 shows that all-unigene length distributions range from 200 bases to more than 2,000 bases. The average GC content of the common bean unigenes (36%), and soybean unigenes (legume reference, 40.9%) was slightly lower than that of Arabidopsis (dicot reference, 42.5%) and rice (monocot reference, 55%) as reported previously [33], [34].
Frequency and distribution of EST-SSRs and SNPs in the common bean transcriptome
Transcriptome sequencing generated a high quantity of data in which different types of polymorphisms (e.g., EST-SSRs and SNPs) can be observed, thus providing valuable resources for the development of molecular markers. The molecular markers are important resources for marker-assisted breeding, determining functional genetic variation and map-based cloning genes. Here, we investigated two types of putative markers from common bean leaves: EST-SSRs and SNPs. Both need future validation for practical use in common bean breeding and research.
EST-SSRs are highly polymorphic, easier to develop and serve as rich resources for diversity. We identified a total of 10,482 SSR loci in transcripts of the common bean with a frequency of one SSR per 4.70 kb of sequence (Table S4). The mononucleotide SSRs represented the largest fraction (58.5%) of SSRs identified, followed by dinucleotide (20.5%) and tri-nucleotide (19.8%) SSRs. Although only a small fraction of tetra- (106), penta- (13) and hexa-nucleotide (10) SSRs were identified in common bean transcripts, the number is quite significant.
The frequencies of EST-SSRs with different numbers of tandem repeats were calculated as shown in Table S6. The most common SSRs were those with six tandem repeats (33.6%), followed by five tandem repeats (29.6%), seven tandem repeats (17.4%), eight tandem repeats (8.7%), nine tandem repeats (5.7%), ten tandem repeats (3.6%), and more than 10 tandem repeats (1.5%). The dominant repeat motif in EST-SSRs was AG/CT (32.9%), followed by AAG/CTT (16.8%), AT/TA (10.5%), AC/GT (7.5%), and AGT/ACT (7.3%) (Table S5). However, very few CG/CG (0.1%) repeats were identified in this study.
SNP markers offer the promise of higher map resolution, higher throughput, lower cost and a lower error rate. Between Long 22-0579 and Naihua, 4,099 SNPs were predicted. Approximately 82.7% of the SNPs were single-base changes of which 44.0% were transitions and 38.8% were transversions. The remaining 17.3% SNPs were indels. Of a total of 1,802 transitions, a similar proportion of bi-allelic types were detected, i.e., 896 for A/G and 906 for C/T. In 1,589 transversion mutations, four types of base substitution (T/G, G/C, A/T, A/C) were detected (Table S6).
Gene annotation and functional classification
To identify the putative function of common bean unigenes, they were BLASTed against the NCBI non-redundant (Nr) protein sequences database. A total of 26,501 (42.2%) common bean unigenes that showed significant similarity to the proteins in Nr database were assigned Nr annotations. The majority of these annotated unigenes had the highest homology to genes from plants, and only 263 (0.99%) annotated unigenes were annotated with sequences from the non-plant sources, such as Candida albicans, Actinomyces turicensis, etc. Three-quarters of annotated unigenes retrieved annotations from Glycine max, reflecting the evolutionary relationship between the common bean and soybean. Moreover, there were also 1,098 annotated unigenes with matched accessions from Phaseolus vulgaris. Small percentages of annotated unigenes showed similarity with proteins from other legumes, such as Cicer arietinum (5.43%), Medicago truncatula (3.75%), Lotus japonicas (1.03%) and Vigna (0.46%), etc. In addition, many common bean unigenes showed homology to uncharacterized proteins annotated as unknown hypothetical and expressed proteins (Table S7).
GO enrichment analysis was carried out to classify the gene functions of the unigenes identified. A total of 11,580 (18.4%) unigenes were assigned and classified into 50 terms from the three main categories: biological process category, molecular function category and cellular component category. The remaining unigenes failed to be assigned GO terms, which may be attributed to the lack of information on these genes (e.g., unknown, or hypothetical and expressed proteins). Among those, 20,309, 14,166 and 14,208 unigenes were assigned at least one GO term in the biological process category, molecular function category and cellular component category, respectively. In the cellular component categories, the cell (39.65%) and cell parts (39.65%) were most abundantly represented. In contrast, rare unigenes were sorted into extracellular region parts (0.03%) or extracellular region parts (0.03%). Among the various biological processes, the two most highly represented lineages were metabolic process (58.30%) and cellular process (51.20%). The genes involved in other important biological processes, such as establishment of localization, localization, pigmentation and biological regulation, were also identified through GO annotations. Similarly, catalytic activity (50.85%) and binding (54.9%) were most represented among the various molecular functions (Figure 2a).
a), GO annotation of common bean unigenes. The results are summarized in three main categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. In total, 11,580 genes have been assigned 50 GO terms. In some cases, one gene has multiple terms. b), COG functional annotations of common bean unigenes. A, RNA processing and modification; B, Chromatin structure and dynamics; C, Energy production and conversion; D, Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; F, Nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; H, Coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, Lipid transport and metabolism; J, Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, Transcription; L, Replication, recombination and repair; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, Cell motility; O, Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; R, General function prediction only; S, Function unknown; T, Signal transduction mechanisms; U, Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; V, Defense mechanisms; Y, Nuclear structure; Z, Cytoskeleton. c), Histogram presentation of KEGG classification of unigenes. The all unigenes were assigned X pathways within X clades under five major categories: I, Metabolism; II, Genetic information processing; III, Environmental information processing; IV, Cellular processes; V, Organismal systems.
Using COG functional classification, 8,156 (30.8%) unigenes aligned to the COG database and were classified into 24 functional categories, among which the general function prediction was the largest group (3,035 genes, 37.2%). Followings are the groups of 1) posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (1,421 genes, 17.4%); 2) replication, recombination and repair (1,371 genes, 16.8%); 3) transcription (1,295 genes, 15.9%); 4) amino acid transport and metabolism (1,271 genes, 15.6%), 5) inorganic ion transport and metabolism (1,228 genes, 15.1%); and 6) signal transduction mechanisms (1,178 genes, 14.4%). Genes annotated as “cell motility” (21 genes, 0.3%) and “nuclear structure” (7, 0.1%) represent the smallest groups predicted by COG. (Figure 2b).
To characterize the active biological pathways in the common bean, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was used to analyze the pathway annotations of unigene sequences. In total, 3,444 (13.00%) sequences were aligned with the KEGG database and were assigned to 173 KEGG pathways. These pathways belonged to 22 clades under five major KEGG categories, including ‘metabolism’, ‘genetic information processing’, ‘environmental information processing’, ‘cellular processes’, and ‘organismal systems’ (Figure 2c). Among them, ‘ribosome’(246), ‘plant hormone signal transduction’(233), ‘protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum’(182), ‘starch and sucrose metabolism’(154) and ‘purine metabolism’(149) were the top five pathways most represented by all-unigenes. These results provide an advantageous resource for investigating specific processes, functions and pathways in plant drought research.
Different expression genes (DEGs) analysis under drought conditions
First, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing to explore whether steady-state levels of certain protein-encoding RNAs differ under drought conditions using DEGseq. We collated a list of 4,139 genes according to the DEGseq statistical tests, FET, LRT, MARS (p-value≤0.001) and FC (log2 normalized fold change ≥2), representing differences in RNA expression between samples LOI and LTD, and 6,989 genes between NOI and NTD. In this study, DEGs with higher expression levels in terminal drought-treated samples when compared with optimal irrigation-treated samples were denoted as ‘up-regulated’ versus ‘down-regulated’. Overall, there are much more DEGs in the Naihua than in the Long 22-0579. Between samples LOI and LTD, the number of down-regulated DEGs (2,013) was higher than the up-regulated DEGs (2,126). By contrast, more up-regulated DEGs (1,185) than down-regulated DEGs (5,804) were identified when comparing NOI and NTD. Only a small portion of DEGs (659 up-regulated and 1,528 down-regulated) shared common tendency of expression changes between optimal irrigation and terminal drought in Long 22-0579 or Naihua. Five DEGs were up-regulated between LOI and LTD but down-regulated between NOI and NTD, and 4 DEGs were down-regulated between LOI and LTD but up-regulated between NOI and NTD (Figure 3).
The numbers of DEGs that were exclusively up- or down-regulated in one genotype are shown in each circle. The numbers of DEGs with common or opposite tendency of expression changes between different genotypes are shown in the overlapping regions. The total numbers of up- or down-regulated gene in each genotype are shown outside of the circles.
In this study, the KEGG pathway analysis helped us understand the biological function of DEGs under different treatments. Eight hundred thirty DEGs were assigned to 235 pathways, mostly associated with plant hormone signal transduction (69 DEGs), carbon metabolism (63 DEGs) and starch sucrose metabolism (60 DEGs) (Table S8). We also conducted GO enrichment analysis for DEGs with the whole transcriptome set as the background. In the biological process category, molecular function category and cellular component category, 2,899, 1,817 and 2,022 DEGs were assigned at least one GO term, respectively. The significantly overrepresented GO categories of biological processes were from single-organism metabolic pathways, oxidation-reduction pathways and carbohydrate metabolic pathways (Table S9).
After removing DEGs between treatments, the identified DEGs were analyzed using edgeR with a p-value≤0.001 and fold change ≥2 representing differences in RNA expression between different cultivars (Long 22-0579 or Naihua). DEGs with higher expression levels in Long 22-0579 when compared with Naihua were denoted as ‘up-regulated’ versus ‘down-regulated’. Overall, we collated a list of 473 genes representing differences in RNA expression between Long 22-0579 and Naihua, with more up-regulated DEGs (281) than down-regulated DEGs (192) (Table S10). With GO enrichment analysis for DEGs with the whole transcriptome set as the background, 80,151 and 3 were assigned at least one GO term in the biological processes category, molecular functions category and cellular components category, respectively. The significantly overrepresented GO terms were catalytic activity (72), oxidoreductase activity (15) and oxidation-reduction process (15) (Table S11). Twelve unigenes are related to stress response. Of the 473 DEGs, 31 were aligned with the KEGG database and were assigned to 68 KEGG pathways. The majority of the KEGG pathways included one gene, and most contained only four genes (Table S12).
Experimental verification of DEGs
The 16 candidate DEGs obtained by RNA-seq analysis were further validated using RT-PCR (Figure 4). These candidates mainly included genes associated with, or involved in drought stress response in other plant species, such as genes involved in plant hormone pathways (auxin, gibberellins, and ethylene) or zinc finger proteins and genes encoding transcription factors (WRKY, NAC and DREB). In addition, there were three candidates with unknown functions and two candidates with no annotations, which represented a new resource for genes related to drought response. All these candidates fall into three classes, first, four of these genes (comp13117_c0_seq1, comp19490_c0_seq1, comp18282_c0_seq1 and comp40404_c0_seq1) were shown to have differential expression between the control and treatment (Long 22-0579 or Naihua). In the case of drought, the expression level of comp13117_c0_seq1 all up-regulated between the control and treatment (Long 22-0579 or Naihua, respectively. However, comp19490_c0_seq1 and comp40404_c0_seq1 genes were up-regulated after drought stress. These genes exhibited up or down-regulated under drought stress, moreover, these four genes expression pattern were similar between two different drought tolerant genotypes after drought stress. These four genes may not be responsible for the different levels of drought tolerance in Long 22-0579 and Naihua. More studies will be required before we know what the functions of these genes are and whether they relate to drought. Second, eight DEGs (comp18253_c0_seq1, comp18888_c3_seq1, comp18293_c0_seq1, comp19585_c0_seq1, comp16965_c0_seq1, comp40354_c0_seq1, comp19389_c0_seq1, and comp38170_c0_seq1) were shown to have differential expression between LOI and LTD. These genes whose expression levels changed about two to ten-fold in response to drought treatment. Thirdly, four DEGs (comp11891_c0_seq1, comp18632_c0_seq1, comp19229_c0_seq1 and comp18242_c0_seq1) were shown to have differential expression between NOI and NTD. Significantly, the expression patterns of the most of the genes did not display clear correlations with the differences in drought tolerance observed in the Long 22-0579 and Naihua. Nevertheless, it is clear that the genes differ considerably between the two cultivars, suggesting that the DEGs could not totally explain the drought higher tolerance observed in Long 22-0579. Finally, we compared relative gene expression levels between drought-treated and control leaves. The expression profiles of the 16 candidates were generally in agreement with the predictions from the RNA-seq results (Table S13). These results suggested that the data obtained from the DEGs analysis were credible.
The relative gene expression levels as expressed by 2−△△CT were determined separately for each treatment as the mean±S. A, comp13117_c0_seq1; B, comp19490_c0_seq1; C, comp18282_c0_seq1; D, comp40404_c0_seq1; E, comp18253_c0_seq1; F, comp18888_c3_seq1; G, comp18293_c0_seq1; H, comp19585_c0_seq1; I, comp16965_c0_seq1; J, comp40354_c0_seq1; K, comp19389_c0_seq1; L, comp38170_c0_seq1; M, comp11891_c1_seq1; N, comp18632_c0_seq1; O, comp19229_c0_seq1; P, comp18242_c0_seq1.
Discussion
Common bean transcriptome characterization
The common bean is one of the most important legume crop plants, with a high protein content and high amounts of fiber, complex carbohydrates and other dietary element proteins, making it a very important target for genomic studies, thus being used as a diploid model for soybean research [2]. For legumes such as soybean, Medicago, lotus, chickpea and pigeonpea, genome sequencing has been nearly completed and a vast collection of ESTs are available for functional genomic studies [35]–[40]. However, very few genomic resources, including transcript sequences, EST sequences and molecular markers are available for the common bean. We have generated more than 270 million sequence reads, approximately 27 Gb from the common bean whole plant transcriptome, representing approximately 42× sequencing depth of the common bean genome. This sequencing depth provides a greater number of repeat sequence reads for individual gene and greater accuracy and reliability of sequencing data, especially during the assembly process. Based on the final assembly results, we obtained a non-redundant set of 62,828 unigenes representing approximately 49 Mb sequences. More than half of the assembled gene sizes are less than 500 bp (55.5%), which might not represent the full-length of all genes in the database. The current minimum gene size is satisfactory for future EST probe applications. Finally, we successfully constructed the first common bean whole plant unigene database deploying normalization and Illumina Hiseq 2500 sequencing technologies.
The de novo transcriptome assemblies are useful to develop molecular markers for further efforts in common bean breeding or molecular studies. For this purpose, a large number of EST-SSR and SNP loci were generated in this study. In contrast to the several previous publications describing the development EST-SSRs and SNPs primers [41]–[43], this study provides the first large set of potential EST-SSRs (10,482) and SNPs (4,099) using transcriptome sequences in the common bean. The number of dinucleotide SSRs was much higher than tri-nucleotide SSRs in this study, which is in contrast to a previous study reporting the larger number of tri-nucleotide (53.8%) SSRs than dinucleotide (30.9%) SSRs in common bean ESTs [41]. In support of our study, the larger number of dinucleotide (31.3%) SSRs than tri-nucleotide (22.3%) SSRs has also been reported in common bean ESTs [44]. Among the tri-nucleotide and dinucleotide motifs, it appears that AG/CT, AAG/CTT was more prevalent than other motifs, as reported by Blair et al [41]. In this study, the proportions of transitions and transversions were 44.0 and 38.8%, respectively. The proportion of SNP classes detected here was similar to that previously reported in the common bean (43.57% transitions, 38.41% transversions, and 18.02% indels), but differed significantly from what was previously reported in the common bean: 43.57% transitions, 38.41% transversions, and 18.02% indels or 55.70% transitions, 44.30% transversions, and 15.00% indels [45], [46]. These genome-wide markers will enrich the existing common bean resources, and could especially be of great value for constructing high-density linkage maps, marker-trait association, diversity analysis, etc.
Identification of drought-responsive genes
In this study, RNA-Seq DEG technology was used to identify DEGs of the common bean under optimal irrigation and terminal drought conditions. This is the first report to identify common bean drought-responsive regulatory proteins using drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes, despite the reports that the identification of DEGs related to drought stress in Arabidopsis, rice, and other legume plants [29], [47]–[50]. The identification of candidate genes would aid the research of common bean drought-tolerant molecular mechanisms and, more broadly, drought stress responses in legume plants. In this paper, we detected DEGs by different method. Nevertheless, it could help us to found more DEGs about drought. This strategy may be detected two type DEGs, which were identified to be differentially expressed following drought treatment in drought tolerant or sensitive genotype, and between different drought tolerant genotypes.
Drought tolerance is a complex trait that involves multiple complex molecular mechanisms to avoid or tolerate periods of water deficit. Based on the comparison of gene expression levels, we identified 9,298 drought-responsive candidate genes, approximately 14.8% of the total all-unigenes, which can be divided into two types: DEGs between treatment and control and DEGs between different genotypes. Among them, there were many homologs of drought-inducible genes that were identified previously in other plant species, such as Arabidopsis and soybean. According to the GO and KEGG annotations, many DEGs are involved in important drought-related metabolic processes, such as cell metabolic processes and cell wall and carbohydrate biosynthetic processes (comp34280_c0_seq1, comp3320_c0_seq1 and comp34280_c0_seq1, etc.). Cell wall genes encode proteins that function to enhancing mechanical resistance of drought-exposed cells [51]. Carbohydrate metabolism-related genes responded greatly to drought stress and were reported to enhance the capacity of the leaf lamina of Arabidopsis thaliana to endure a transient water deficit [52]. In this study, we also detected several proline-related genes: comp25511_c0_seq1, comp37160_c1_seq1, comp18574_c1_seq1, etc. Proline is an osmo-protectant critical for adaptation to drought [53]. Many proline-related genes have been cloned and verified to improve drought resistance of plants [54], [55]. Some transcription factor (TF) were enriched in MYB, WRKY, C2H2, NAC, and DREB family of DEGs, such as comp32316_c1_seq1, comp40771_c0_seq1, comp7618_c0_seq1, comp27508_c1_seq1 and comp34578_c1_seq1. Previous studies have shown that TF families, such as MYB, DREB, NAC, bZIP and WRKY, are directly or indirectly involved in the regulation of plant response to drought stress [56]–[58]. Recently, it has been shown that GmDREB2, GmERF3, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, GmWRKY54, and GsZFP1 confer the tolerance to drought in transgenic plants [59]–[62] differentially. In addition, several plant hormone-related genes, such as gibberellin biosynthesis genes (comp34755_c0_seq1), auxin related protein (comp17800_c0_seq1), ABA related genes (comp24144_c1_seq1), and ethylene related genes (comp40878_c0_seq1) were identified to be significantly and differentially between drought treatment and control. Overexpression of dehydration-responsive element-binding proteins (SlDREB) in tomato suppresses GA biosynthesis and promotes drought resistance [63]. Similarly, tomato plants overexpressing Arabidopsis gibberellin methyl transferase 1 (AtGAMT1) also exhibited increased tolerance to drought [64]. Other plant hormone-related genes were reported to play an important role under terminal drought condition [20], [65]–[66]. In addition to these genes, many other important genes were up- or down-regulated under drought, such as signaling and cell communication-related genes, including Ca2+-binding (comp18500_c0_seq1) and GTP binding protein (comp16864_c1_seq1), kinase and protein phosphatase (comp5659_c0_seq1), etc. These kinase and phosphatase transcripts have been suggested to impact the drought process in plants [67]–[69]. Some of the differentially expressed genes during the terminal drought process could not be annotated; therefore, their functions remain to be investigated in future study.
In conclusion, we have obtained a comprehensive transcriptome of the common bean using the Illumina sequencing technology. This study will contribute a significant, non-redundant set of 62,828 unigenes in the common bean. The detailed analyses have identified a large number of EST-SSRs and SNPs. Our work will be a great help to the development of genomic resources for the common bean and will accelerate functional genomics studies and breeding programs. In addition, the candidate drought-responsive genes identified in the common bean will be a new resource for molecular breeding in legumes or other crops. Moreover, our work has demonstrated the high reliability of the sequencing-based approach for identifying stress-responsive genes in legumes.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Classification and agronomic traits of two common bean cultivars.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s002
(DOC)
Table S2.
Drought resistance index of each cultivar.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s003
(DOC)
Table S4.
Statistics of SSRs identified in common bean transcripts.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s005
(DOC)
Table S5.
Frequency of di- and tri-nucleotide EST-SSR repeat motifs in the common bean.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s006
(DOC)
Table S6.
Statistics for SNPs between Long 22–0579 and Naihua.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s007
(DOC)
Table S7.
Annotation sources for the unigenes of the common bean.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s008
(DOC)
Table S10.
DEGs between Long 22–0579 and Naihua.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s011
(XLS)
Table S13.
qRT-PCR verification of 16 DEGs in the drought-treated leaves compared to the control.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.s014
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JW SW. Performed the experiments: JW LW LL. Analyzed the data: JW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LW LL. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: JW SW.
References
- 1. Broughton WJ, Hernández G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, et al. (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)-model food legumes. Plant Soil 252, 55–128.
- 2. Miklas PN, Kelly JD, Beebe SE, Blair MW (2006) Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses, from classical to MAS breeding, Euphytica, 147, 105–131.
- 3. Nielsen DC, Nelson N (1998) Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Sci 38, 422–427.
- 4. Ramirez-Vallejo P, Kelly JD (1998) Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99, 127–128.
- 5. Henry A, Rosas JC, Beaver JS, Lynch JP (2010) Multiple stress response and belowground competition in multilines of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res 117, 209–218.
- 6. Singh SP, Terán H, Gutierrez JA (2001) Registration of SEA5 and SEA13 drought tolerant dry bean germplasm. Crop Sci 41, 276–277.
- 7. Terán H, Singh SP (2002) Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought tolerance in common bean. Crop Sci., 42, 64–70.
- 8. Rosales MA, Ocampo E, Rodríguez-Valentín R, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Acosta-Gallegos J, et al. (2012) Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance, Plant Physiol Biochem 56, 27–34.
- 9. Blair MW, Galeano CH, Tovar E, Muñoz Torres MC, Castrillón AV, et al. (2012) Development of a Mesoamerican intra-gene pool genetic map for quantitative trait loci detection in a drought tolerant× susceptible common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Mol Breed 29, 71–88.
- 10. Cichy K, Caldas G, Snapp S, Blair M (2008) QTL Analysis of seed iron, zinc, and phosphorus levels in an andean bean population. Crop Sci 49, 1742–1750.
- 11. Prophete E, Demosthenes G, Godoy-Lutz G, Porch TG Beaver JS (2014) Registration of PR0633-10 and R0737-1 red mottled dry bean germplasm lines with resistance to BGYMV, BCMV, BCMNV, and common bacterial blight. J Plant Reg 8, 49–52.
- 12. Asfaw A, Blair M (2012) Quantitative trait loci for rooting pattern traits of common beans grown under drought stress versus non-stress conditions. Mol Breed 30, 681–695.
- 13. Asfaw A, Blair M, Struik P (2012) Multi environment quantitative trait loci analysis for photosynthate acquisition, accumulation, and remobilization traits in common bean under drought stress. G3 (Bethesda), 5, 579–595.
- 14. Schneider KA, Brothers ME, Kelly JF (1997) Marker-assisted selection to improve drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 37, 51–60.
- 15. Schneider KA, Rosales-Serna R, Ibarra-Perez F, Cazares-Enriquez B, Acosta-Gallego JA, et al. (1997) Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Sci 37, 43–50.
- 16. Alcazar R, Planas J, Saxena T, Zarza X, Bortolotti C, et al. (2010) Putrescine accumulation confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the homologous arginine decarboxylase 2 gene. Plant Physiol Biochem 48, 547–552.
- 17. Alet AI, Sanchez DH, Cuevas JC, Del Valle S, Altabella T, et al. (2011) Putrescine accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic lines enhances tolerance to dehydration and freezing stress. Plant Signal Behav 6, 278–286.
- 18. Kasukabe Y, He L, Nada K, Misawa S, Ihara I, et al. (2004) Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 45, 712–722.
- 19. Li HW, Zang BS, Deng XW, Wang XP (2011) Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene OsTPS1 enhances abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Planta 234, 1007–1018.
- 20. Liu S, Wang X, Wang H, Xin H, Yang X, et al. (2013) Genome-wide analysis of ZmDREB genes and their association with natural variation in drought tolerance at seedling stage of Zea mays L. PLoS Genetics 9, e1003790.
- 21. Yamada M, Morishita H, Urano K, Shiozaki N, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. (2005) Effects of free proline accumulation in petunias under drought stress. J Exp Bot 56, 1975–1981.
- 22. Chen J, Zhang X, Jing R, Blair MW, Mao X, et al. (2010) Cloning and genetic diversity analysis of a new P5CS gene from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 120, 1393–1404.
- 23. Rodriguez-Uribe L, O’Connell MA (2006) A root-specific bZIP transcription factor is responsive to water deficit stress in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (P. vulgaris). J Exp Bot 57, 1391–1398.
- 24. Mardis ER (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9, 387–402.
- 25. Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Next generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27, 522–530.
- 26. Huang J, Lu X, Yan H, Chen S, Zhang W, et al. (2012) Transcriptome characterization and sequencing-based identification of salt-responsive genes in Millettia pinnata, a semi-mangrove plant. DNA Res 19, 195–207.
- 27. Utsumi Y, Tanaka M, Morosawa T, Kurotani A, Yoshida T, et al. (2012) Transcriptome analysis using a high-density oligomicroarray under drought stress in various genotypes of cassava: an important tropical crop. DNA Res 19, 335–345.
- 28. Xia JH, Liu P, Liu F, Lin G, Sun F, et al. (2013) Analysis of stress-responsive transcriptome in the intestine of asian seabass (lates calcarifer) using RNA-seq. DNA Res 20, 449–460.
- 29. Yao LM, Wang B, Cheng LJ, Wu TL (2013) Identification of key drought stress-related genes in the hyacinth bean. Plos One 8, e58108.
- 30. Wu XS, Chang XP, Jing RL (2008) Screening indexes for drought resistance of wheat at grain-filling stage. J Triticeae Crops 28, 626–632.
- 31. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, et al. (2013) De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc 8, 1494–1512.
- 32. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. (2009) The Sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAM tools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079.
- 33. Carels N, Bernardi G (2000) Two classes of genes in plants. Genetics 154, 1819–1825.
- 34. Garg R, Patel RK, Tyagi AK, Jain M (2011) De novo assembly of chickpea transcriptome using short reads for gene discovery and marker identification. DNA Res 18, 53–63.
- 35. Cannon SB, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species, rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant Physiol 151, 970–977.
- 36. Cheung F, Haas BJ, Goldberg SM, May GD, Xiao Y, et al. (2006) Sequencing Medicago truncatula expressed sequenced tags using 454 life sciences technology. BMC Genomics 7, 272.
- 37. Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, et al. (2008) Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicas. DNA Res 15, 227–239.
- 38. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463, 178–183.
- 39. Varshney RK, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti AK, Saxena RK, et al. (2012) Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat Biotechnol 31, 83–89.
- 40. Varshney RK, Song C, Saxena RK, Azam S, Yu S, et al. (2013) Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement, Nat Biotechnol 31, 240–246.
- 41. Blair MW, Hurtado N, Chavarro CM, Muñoz-Torres MC, Giraldo MC, et al. (2011) Gene-based SSR markers for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) derived from root and leaf tissue ESTs, an integration of the BMc series. BMC Plant Biol 11, 50.
- 42. Galeano CH, Fernández AC, Gómez M, Blair MW (2009) Single strand conformation polymorphism based SNP and indel markers for genetic mapping and synteny analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), BMC genomics 10, 629.
- 43. Goretti D, Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Rodriguez M, Rau D, et al. (2014) Development of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Phaseolus vulgaris and related Phaseolus spp. Mol Breed 33, 531–544.
- 44. Garcia RA, Rangel PN, Brondani C, Martins WS, Melo LC, et al. (2011) The characterization of a new set of EST-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers as a resource for the genetic analysis of Phaseolus vulgaris. BMC Genet 12, 41.
- 45. Gaitán-Solís E, Choi IY, Quigley C, Cregan P, Tohme J (2008) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in common bean, their discovery and genotyping using a multiplex detection system. Plant Genome 1, 125–134.
- 46. Souza TLPO, de Barros EG, Bellato CM, Hwang EY, Cregan PB, Pastor-Corrales MA (2012) Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in common bean. Mol Breed 30, 419–428.
- 47. Degenkolbe T, Do PT, Zuther E, Repsilber D, Walther D, et al. (2009) Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long term drought stress. Plant Mol Biol 69, 133–153.
- 48. Gong PJ, Zhang JH, Li HX (2010) Transcription profiles of drought-responsive genes in Transcription profiles of drought-responsive genes in modulating transcription signal transduction, and biochemical pathways in tomato. J Exp Bot 61, 3563–3575.
- 49. Oono Y, Seki M, Nanjo T, Narusaka M, Fujita M, et al. (2003) Monitoring expression profiles of Arabidopsis gene expression during rehydration process after dehydration using ca. 7000 full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 34, 868–887.
- 50. Zhou YJ, Gao F, Liu B, Feng JC, Li HJ (2012) De novo sequencing and analysis of root transcriptome using 454 pyrosequencing to discover putative genes associated with drought tolerance in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. BMC Genomics 13, 266.
- 51. Lopez CG, Banowetz GM, Peterson CJ, Kronstad WE (2003) Dehydrin expression and drought tolerance in seven wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 43, 577–582.
- 52. Zeeman SC, Thorneycroft D, Schupp N, Chapple A, Weck M, et al. (2004) Plastidial a-glucan phosphorylase is not required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves but has a role in the tolerance of abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 135, 849–858.
- 53. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu JH, Zhu JK (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45, 523–539.
- 54. Choudhary NL, Sairam RK, Tyagi A (2005) Expression of delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene during drought in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Bioch Bio 42, 366–370.
- 55. De Ronde JA, Cress WA, Krüger GH, Strasser RJ, Van Staden J (2004) Photosynthetic response of transgenic soybean plants, containing an Arabidopsis P5CR gene, during heat and drought stress. J Plant Physiol 161, 1211–1224.
- 56. Huang G, Ma S, Bai L, Zhang L, Ma H, et al. (2010) Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol Biol Rep 39, 969–987.
- 57. Ren X, Chen Z, Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang M, Liu Q, et al. (2010) ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 63, 417–429.
- 58. Singh K, Foley RC, Onate-Sanchez L (2002) Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses, Curr Opin Plant Biol 5, 430–436.
- 59. Chen M, Wang QY, Cheng XG, Xu ZS, Li LC, et al. (2007) GmDREB2, a soybean DRE-binding transcription factor, conferred drought and high salt tolerance in transgenic plants. Biochem Bioph Res Co 353, 299–305.
- 60. Luo X, Bai X, Zhu D, Li Y, Ji W, et al. (2011) GsZFP1, a new Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger protein, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to cold and drought stress. Planta 235, 1–15.
- 61. Zhang G, Chen M, Li L, Xu Z, Chen X, et al. (2009) Overexpression of the soybean GmERF3 gene, an AP2/ERF type transcription factor for increased tolerances to salt, drought, and diseases in transgenic tobacco. J Exp Bot 60, 3781–3796.
- 62. Zhou QY, Tian AG, Zou HF, Xie ZM, Lei G, et al. (2008) Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants Plant Biotechnol J 6, 486–503.
- 63. Li J, Sima W, Ouyang B, Wang T, Ziaf K, et al. (2012) Tomato SlDREB gene restricts leaf expansion and internode elongation by downregulating key genes for gibberellin biosynthesis. J Exp Bot 63, 6407–6420.
- 64. Nir I, Moshelion M, Weiss D (2014) The Arabidopsis GIBBERELLIN METHYL TRANSFERASE 1 suppresses gibberellin activity, reduces whole-plant transpiration and promotes drought tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell Environ 37, 113–123.
- 65. Mittal A, Gampala SS, Ritchie GL, Payton P, Burke JJ, et al. (2014) Related to ABA-Insensitive3 (ABI3)/Viviparous1 and AtABI5 transcription factor coexpression in cotton enhances drought stress adaptation. Plant Biotechnol J 12, 578–589.
- 66. Xu ZS, Chen M, Li LC, Ma YZ (2008) Functions of the ERF transcription factor family in plants. Botany 86, 969–977.
- 67. Liu J, Ishitani M, Halfter U, Kim CS, Zhu J (2000) The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 73730–73734.
- 68. Marshall A, Aalen RB, Audenaert D, Beeckman T, Broadley MR, et al. (2012) Tackling drought stress, receptor-like kinases present new approaches. Plant Cell 24, 2262–2278.
- 69. Merlot S, Gosti F, Guerrier D, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J (2001) The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. Plant J 25, 295–303.