Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spatial Variation in Carbon and Nitrogen in Cultivated Soils in Henan Province, China: Potential Effect on Crop Yield

  • Xuelin Zhang ,

    xuelinzhang1998@163.com

    Affiliation The Incubation Base of the National Key Laboratory for Physiological Ecology and Genetic Improvement of Food Crops in Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China; Agronomy College of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Qun Wang,

    Affiliation The Incubation Base of the National Key Laboratory for Physiological Ecology and Genetic Improvement of Food Crops in Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China; Agronomy College of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Frank S. Gilliam,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America

  • Yilun Wang,

    Affiliation The Incubation Base of the National Key Laboratory for Physiological Ecology and Genetic Improvement of Food Crops in Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China; Agronomy College of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

  • Feina Cha,

    Affiliation Meteorological Bureau of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China

  • Chaohai Li

    Affiliation The Incubation Base of the National Key Laboratory for Physiological Ecology and Genetic Improvement of Food Crops in Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China; Agronomy College of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China

Abstract

Improved management of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage in agro-ecosystems represents an important strategy for ensuring food security and sustainable agricultural development in China. Accurate estimates of the distribution of soil C and N stores and their relationship to crop yield are crucial to developing appropriate cropland management policies. The current study examined the spatial variation of soil organic C (SOC), total soil N (TSN), and associated variables in the surface layer (0–40 cm) of soils from intensive agricultural systems in 19 counties within Henan Province, China, and compared these patterns with crop yield. Mean soil C and N concentrations were 14.9 g kg−1 and 1.37 g kg−1, respectively, whereas soil C and N stores were 4.1 kg m−2 and 0.4 kg m−2, respectively. Total crop production of each county was significantly, positively related to SOC, TSN, soil C and N store, and soil C and N stock. Soil C and N were positively correlated with soil bulk density but negatively correlated with soil porosity. These results indicate that variations in soil C could regulate crop yield in intensive agricultural systems, and that spatial patterns of C and N levels in soils may be regulated by both climatic factors and agro-ecosystem management. When developing suitable management programs, the importance of soil C and N stores and their effects on crop yield should be considered.

Introduction

Safeguarding food security and ensuring sustainable development are two fundamental goals of intensive agriculture in China [1], [2]. Increasing soil C and N sequestration while reducing C and N emissions from agricultural fields are important aspects of sustainable farming and these goals can be achieved through improvement in soil quality [1], [3]. This requires a better understanding of the functional relationship between crop yield and soil organic C and N stores.

Indeed, variations in soil C and N stores may closely regulate crop yield, although published data on the relationship between these parameters are inconsistent. Some studies have reported a positive correlation between soil C and N and crop yield [4], [5], whereas other studies have found no significant relationship between these parameters [6], [7]. Lal (2006) reported that the relationship between soil organic C and crop yield may vary between patterns that are sigmoidal, linear, or exponential [8]. Clearly, the existence of such variability warrants further investigation.

Soil C and N stores in crop lands, especially in the topsoil layer, are potentially greatly affected by human activity; thus, understanding the spatial pattern of soil C and N stores on a regional scale is crucial to developing a management strategy for improving soil fertility [1], [2]. Spatial variation in soil C and N stores in agro-ecosystems has been widely reported [9], [10], [11], including from the northern [12], [13], eastern [14], and southern [15], [16] regions of China. Since these reports from China were based on two national surveys from 1960 and 1983, such data may have limited use in helping to develop management strategies based on current practices [17]. Therefore, in order to better understand the spatial patterns and their relationship to crop yield, it is necessary to update regional soil organic C and N information with contemporary measurements, especially for intensively-used crop land.

Henan Province is the second largest area of crop production in China (China National Bureau of Statistics). To produce an adequate supply of food for the domestic population, unsustainable production methods have often been used in this province. Historically, intensive production based on an annual wheat-maize system has been used to achieve high crop yield. This practice, however, has resulted in badly degraded agricultural soils, causing erosion and a loss of good soil structure. More than 600 kg N ha−1 annually has been applied in this production area, resulting in an increase in soil acidity [18]. Based on the determination that crop yields in China will need to increase from 50 billion in 2010 to 65 billion kg in 2020, the provincial crop lands in Henan Province will continue to play an important role in food production. Such goals create the challenge of improving soil quality, enhancing soil fertility, and mitigating C and N loss, while achieving food security and practicing sustainable agriculture. A better understanding of the spatial variability of soil organic C and N, and their relationship to crop yield, should help to develop management practices that are designed to meet this challenge [1], [19].

The objective of the present study was to characterize the spatial distribution of C and N stores in intensively cultivated counties within the Henan Province of China and to determine the relationship between crop yield and soil organic C and N.

Materials and Methods

Statement: We have field permits for sampling soil in each of the field sites within each county of Henan Province, China. All of the sampling sites are privately owned, and there was no potential impact on any endangered or protected species among these sampling sites.

Study site

The study was carried out in 19 counties within Henan Province, located in central China (Figure 1). Map data were obtained from the National Geomatics Center of China (http://ngcc.sbsm.gov.cn/) using ArcGIS software. As of 2009, the human population of Henan was about 9.9×107 persons. The Province is approximately 167,000 km2 in land area, lying within the monsoonal temperate zone. It has a cultivated land area of 79, 260 km2 for the production of wheat and maize. There are three dominant soil types in Henan Province: Yellow-cinnamon soil (Eutric Cambisols in FAO taxonomy), Sajiang black soil (Eutric Vertisols/Gleyic Cambisol), and Fluvo-aquic soil (Fluvisols in FAO taxonomy) [20]. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 400 to 1000 mm among the counties of the study, with ∼70% of it occurring from July to September; mean annual temperature ranges from 13.6 to 15°C (Figure 2). Cultivated agricultural fields are the predominant land use, representing 60% of the total land area in Henan Province. A double cropping system of winter wheat (early October-early June) and maize (mid-June–later September) is the most common planting system used in this region.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Map of China (top) showing location of Henan Province and counties (bottom) within Henan Province used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Average annual, maximum, and minimum temperature from 1971 to 2004 in Henan Province, China (A), and (B) average temperature and rainfall from 1975 to 2006 in different counties within Henan Province, China (B).

See Table 1 for key to county name abbreviations. All these counties were arranged in English alphabetical order.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.g002

Collection of crop yield and soil sampling and analysis

Data on total crop production (including wheat, maize and millet) and wheat yield from 1978–2009 (Figure. 3A) were obtained from the Henan Statistical Yearbook 2010 (13–17) (http://www.ha.stats.gov.cn/hntj/index.htm). Annual yield data for winter wheat and total crop production in 2009 were also obtained from Henan Statistical Yearbook 2010 (29-7) and the Agricultural Bureau of each of the 19 counties in which soil sampling took place (Figure. 3B). These counties, along with basic climatic information, are listed in Table 1. Climatic data of each county were obtained from Meteorological Bureau of Zhengzhou. All counties will be referred to by the two-letter codes presented in Table 1.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Wheat yield and total crop production (including wheat, maize, millet,) in Henan Province from 1978–2009 (A), and wheat yield and total crop production in different counties within Henan Province in 2009 (B).

See Table 1 for key to county name abbreviations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. Basic geographic coordinates for each county, along with climate data for 19 counties within Henan Province, China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.t001

The 19 counties were selected as representative of the main agro-ecosystems of Henan Province. Soil samples were collected during June 1–15, 2009 following the wheat harvest but prior to the sowing of maize. Six representative, replicate field plots, located at least 6 km apart, were selected within each county based on four criteria: (1) the field plots had been continuously cultivated for at least 30 yr with a native variety, (2) the cropland area was located within 5 km of native vegetation with a similar landscape, soil type and texture, and a relatively flat terrain, and (3) all of the sampling sites are privately owned, and (4) there was no potential impact on any endangered or protected species in the sampling site. Geographic coordinates of each sampling site was recorded by handed GPS of Magellan eXplorist 210(USA), and all of these data were attached in the supporting information.

Sample areas of ∼1300 m2 were established in each plot, with sixteen sampling points taken at random in each of two layers (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm) using a 70 mm - diameter auger. All of the soil samples taken at each layer within a sample plot were mixed together and treated as one sample to represent the value of the plot, yielding 114 soil samples at each layer.

Residual plant material was removed from the soil samples after the samples were air-dried at room temperature. The soil samples were then ground to pass a 2 mm sieve, and a portion of the ground sample was subsequently ground again in a porcelain mortar in order to pass through a 0.15–mm sieve. Organic C and total N measurements were obtained from the twice-ground soil samples. Soil organic C (SOC) was measured using a modified Mebius method. Briefly, 0.1 g soil samples were digested for 5 min with 5 mL of 1N K2Cr2O7 and 10 mL of concentrated H2SO4 at 150°C, followed by titration of the digests with standardized FeSO4. Total soil N (TSN) was measured using a modified Kjeldahl wet digestion procedure and a Tector Kjeltec System 1026 distilling unit. Soil available N was analyzed using a micro-diffusion technique after alkaline hydrolysis (1.8 mol L−1 NaOH). The Olsen method was used to determine available soil phosphorus (P), and available soil potassium (K) was measured in 1 mol L−1 NH4OAc extracts by flame photometry (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Spatial variation in soil (0–40 cm depth) properties, soil organic C (SOC), total soil N (TSN) concentration (g kg−1), and C/N in the 0–40 cm soil layer in 19 counties within Henan province, China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.t002

Three sampling points were used to determine soil bulk density in each plot. Samples were collected separately from four layers within a depth of 0–40 cm in each sampling point. Soil bulk density was measured using 100-cm3 soil cores obtained from the four layers. Soil porosity was calculated from soil bulk density and specific gravity, with any stone material removed and not considered in bulk density calculations.

Calculation of soil organic C and N stores and SOC and TSN

Total soil organic C store (TSOCS) and total soil N stores (TSNS) at 0–40 cm depth were calculated as follows:

Given the cultivated area, the total cultivated topsoil (0–40 cm) C and N stocks of each county were estimated by the equation:where area is the given total cultivated area of each county, and CS and NS are C and N stocks, respectively. SOC and TSN were means of six sampling sites of each county.

Statistics

Analysis of variance was used to assess the significance of location (county) on soil C and N concentration and storage; means were compared using Duncan’s multi-range test at α = 0.05. Linear regression was used to determine the relationships between C and N stock versus wheat and total crop production. Principle components analysis was used to assess patterns of similarity/dissimilarity among counties with respect to several environmental variables [21]. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 10.0 (Chicago IL, USA).

Results

Wheat yields increased more than 250% from 1978 to 2009 while total annual crop production in Henan Province increased from 21 to 54 million tons over the same time period (Figure 3A). Wheat yield varied from 143 to 729 thousand tons among the different counties in 2009 (Figure 3B).

The absolute value of SOC concentration in the top 40 cm of soil varied from 8.13 to 27.89 g kg−1 among the 19 counties in 2009 (Table 2) while TSN concentration varied from 0.84 to 2.2 g kg−1. Soil C/N varied from 6.4 to 20 (Table 2). Soil organic C stores (TSOCS) in the 0–40 cm soil layer varied from 2,322 g m−2 to 8,038 g m−2, whereas total N stores (TSNS) varied from 221 to 659 g m−2. The highest value was in XX County and the lowest in LY County in N reserves (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Total C (TSOCS) and N (TSNS) stores in the surface soil layer (0–40 cm) of soils in 19 counties in Henan Province, China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.t003

Linear regression analysis indicated that total crop production was significantly and positively correlated with SOC and TSN (Figure 4A), soil C and N store (Figure 4B), and soil C and N stocks (Figure 4C). Soil bulk density was significantly and positively correlated with soil N concentration (r = 0.25, p = 0.008, n = 114), soil C (r = 0.21, p = 0.03, n = 114) and N store (r = 0.43, p = 0.001, n = 114). While soil porosity was significantly and negatively correlated with soil N concentration (r = −0.19, p = 0.05, n = 114), soil C (r = −0.25, p = 0.007, n = 114) and N store (r = −0.32, p = 0.001, n = 114).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Linear regression analysis of total crop production in each county (ton ha−1) with SOC and TSN (A) and with soil C and N store (0–40 cm) (B), and the total crop production of each county (10000 ton) with their soil C and N stock (C) (n = 19).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.g004

Principle components analysis revealed that Axis 1, which explained 98% of the variation in all data (eigenvalue = 0.98), was highly correlated with soil C, whereas Axis 2, explaining 1% of the variation (eigenvalue = 0.09), was highly correlated with soil N. Thus, counties such as QX and XP located highly positive on Axis 1 with high levels of soil C, but other counties, such as LK, YJ, and QF, occupied positions toward the negative end of Axis 1 with low soil C (Figure 5).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Principle components analysis of environmental and soil variables for agricultural soils in 19 counties within Henan Province.

Length of arrows is directly proportional to their importance in explaining spatial patterns in the counties. Direction of the arrows indicates increasing values. Thus, the x-axis is primarily a gradient in soil C, whereas the y-axis is primarily a gradient in soil N and rainfall and secondarily a gradient in soil N. See Table 1 for key to county name abbreviations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109188.g005

Discussion

Potential influences on crop yield

It is notable that 14 environmental (e.g., mean annual temperature and precipitation –Table 1) and soil variables (including extractable nutrients-Table 2) examined in our analysis of the data from the 19 counties in Henan Province were correlated with either wheat or total crop yield (data not shown), and total crop production were significantly, positively related to SOC and TSN, soil C and N store, and soil C and N stock (Figure 4). Part of this is likely related to the highly integrated nature of the measures of C and N stocks, i.e., their calculations combine soil concentrations of C and N, soil bulk density, sampling depth, and area of cultivation. However, all of these have been shown to directly influence crop performance. For example, increases in soil C have been shown to increase crop yield in other studies. Lal (2004, 2006) reported increases in yield from 20 to 70 kg ha−1 and 10 to 300 kg ha−1 for wheat and maize, respectively, following increases of 1 MT of C in agricultural soils in Africa [1], [8]. Similarly, loss of soil C has been shown to decrease yield in agricultural soils of Canada and the U.S. [4], [5].

Soil C-mediated increases of crop yields also may arise from improvements in soil structure and available water-holding capacity. Enhanced soil structure, via increased soil C, generally arises from several processes, including increasing stability of soil aggregates [22], [23], [24]. As a result of the increased stability of the aggregates, soils become less prone to crusting, compaction, and erosion [25], [26], [28]. Emerson (1995) demonstrated that an increase of 1 g of soil organic matter (∼50% of which is C) can increase available soil moisture by up to 10 g [27], which is enough to maintain crop growth between periods of rainfall of 5 to 10 days [8].

Spatial variation in cultivated soils

In this study, soil organic C concentration averaged 14.9 g kg−1 and total N averaged 1.4 g kg−1 in the 0–40 cm layer across all sites, while soil C and N stores averaged 4.1 kg C m−2and 0.38 kg N m−2, respectively. These values are comparable to published values from other regions of China, including 9–15 g C kg−1 and 1.2–1.8 g N kg−1 in northern China [12], [29], and 16.1 g C kg−1and 1.04 g N kg−1 in eastern and southern China [14], [16], [30]. Liu et al. (2011) reported soil C stores of 4.57 kg C m−2 in the Loess Plateau region in northwestern China [13].

Principal components analysis separated the 19 counties primarily along a gradient in soil C, with counties LK, YJ, QF, ZY, HX, and TK (mean soil C = 12.1 g C kg−1) toward the lower end and XP and QX (mean soil C = 20.5 g C kg−1) toward the upper end of Axis 1, which accounted for nearly 80% of the variation in soil and environmental data (Figure 5). Spatial variation in soil organic C in agricultural systems can be influenced by several factors, including microclimate, soil type, topography, and especially human activity [31].

Spatial variation in soil N was essentially orthogonal to that of soil C. This was surprising since typically, the two are highly correlated in terrestrial ecosystems [32]. As a result, the secondary gradient (i.e., Axis 2) was one of soil N, with counties TK, YC, SS, LY, YX, and XP (mean soil N = 1.15 g N kg−1) located toward the lower end of Axis 2 (accounting for <10% of variation) and XX and TY (mean soil N = 1.81 g N kg−1) located toward the upper end of Axis 2 (Figure 5). Although C and N are often correlated through their organic forms in plant detritus, spatial variation of N in soils of agro-ecosystems can also be greatly influenced by the extensive use of N fertilizers.

Management methods used in crop production systems, including tillage practices and fertilizer use, can affect soil C and N on broad spatial scales, including that of an entire Province [33]. Over the course of repeated seasons of crop growth in Henan Province, agricultural fields are repeatedly subjected to soil tillage, planting, fertilization, irrigation, and harvest, all of which potentially influence soil C and N stores [30], [34]. In contrast, Zhang et al. (2012) reported that raised-bed planting, a viable alternative to conventional tillage, can significantly enhance the yield of summer maize while simultaneously improving soil structure, as well as the structure and function of microbial communities essential to the quality of agricultural soils [22].

Results presented in the current study underscore the complexity of factors that can impact agricultural soils and their ability to produce crops to meet the ever-increasing demand in China resulting from population growth. Some of the spatial pattern exhibited in ordination space (Figure 5) is clearly related to regional factors, such as microclimate. For example, WY and LC are adjacent to each other in Henan Province (Figure 1) and are also closely clustered in ordination space, indicating that they are very similar with respect to environmental and soil characteristics. XP and SS, however, are also adjacent counties; yet occur distant from each other in ordination space, indicating great dissimilarity in environmental and soil factors. Agronomists should take into account the large spatial variability in important components of the soils in Henan Province, especially in the variation of soil C and N, when considering appropriate agronomic management practices.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XLZ QW CHL. Performed the experiments: XLZ QW YLW. Analyzed the data: XLZ QW FSG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XLZ QW YLW FNC. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: XLZ FSG CHL.

References

  1. 1. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304: 1623–1627.
  2. 2. Liu DW, Wang ZM, Zhang B, Song KS, Li XY, et al. (2006) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 113: 73–81.
  3. 3. Smith WN, Desjardins RL, Pattey E (2000) The net flux of carbon from agricultural soils in Canada 1970–2010. Global Change Biology 6: 557–568.
  4. 4. Bauer A, Black AL (1994) Quantification of the effect of soil organic matter content on soil productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 185–193.
  5. 5. Larney FJ, Janzen HH, Olson BM, Lindwall CW (2000) Soil quality and productivity response to simulated erosion and restorative amendments. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 80: 515–522.
  6. 6. Hairiah K, Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G (2000) Crop yield, C and N balance of the three types of cropping systems on an Ultisol in northern Lampung. Netherland Journal of Agricultural Science 48: 3–17.
  7. 7. Duxbury JM (2001) Long-term yield trends in the rice-wheat cropping system: results from experiments in Northwest India. Journal of Crop Production 3: 27–52.
  8. 8. Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degradation and Development 17: 197–209.
  9. 9. Batjes NH (2002) Carbon and nitrogen stocks in the soils of Central and Eastern Europe. Soil Use and Management 18: 324–329.
  10. 10. Maia SMF, Ogle SM, Cerri CC, Cerri CEP (2010) Changes in soil organic carbon storage under different agricultural management systems in the Southwest Amazon Region of Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 106: 177–184.
  11. 11. Piao SL, Fang JY, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, et al. (2009) The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458, doi:10.1038/nature 07944.
  12. 12. Wang ZM, Zhang B, Song KS, Liu DW, Ren CY (2010) Spatial variability of soil organic carbon under maize monoculture in the Song-Nen plain, Northeast China. Pedosphere 20: 80–89.
  13. 13. Liu ZP, Shao MA, Wang YQ (2011) Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 142: 184–194.
  14. 14. Liao QL, Zhang XH, Li ZP, Pan GX, Smith P, et al. (2009) Increase in soil organic carbon stock over the last two decades in China’s Jiangsu Province. Global Change Biology 15: 861–875.
  15. 15. Zhang HB, Luo YM, Wong MH, Zhao QG, Zhang GL (2007) Soil organic carbon storage and changes with reduction in agricultural activities in Hong Kong. Geoderma 139: 412–419.
  16. 16. Feng S, Tan S, Zhang A, Zhang Q, Pan G, et al. (2011) Effect of household land management on cropland topsoil organic carbon storage at plot scale in a red earth soil area of South China. Journal of Agricultural Science 149: 557–566.
  17. 17. Harper RJ, Gilkes RJ (1995) Some factors affecting the distribution of carbon in soils of a dry land agricultural system in southwestern Australia. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (editors). Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA. PP.577–591.
  18. 18. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, et al. (2010) Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands. Science 327: 1008–1010.
  19. 19. Pan GX, Li LQ, Wu LS, Zhang XH (2003) Storage and sequestration potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils. Global Change Biology 10: 79–92.
  20. 20. Wu HB, Guo ZT, Gao Q, Peng CH (2009) Distribution of soil inorganic carbon storage and its changes due to agricultural land use activity in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 129: 413–421.
  21. 21. Gilliam FS, Saunders NE (2003) Making more sense of the order: A review of Canoco for Windows 4.5, PC-ORD version 4 and SYN-TAX 2000. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 297–304.
  22. 22. Zhang XL, Ma L, Gilliam FS, Wang Q, Liu T, et al. (2012) Effects of raised-bed planting for enhanced summer maize yield on soil microbial functional groups and enzyme activity in Henan Province, China. Field Crops Research 130: 28–37.
  23. 23. Feller C, Beare MH (1997) Physical control of soil organic matter dynamics in tropics. Geoderma 79: 69–116.
  24. 24. Haynes RJ, Naidu R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51: 123–137.
  25. 25. Diaz-Zorita M, Grosso GA (2000) Effect of soil texture, organic carbon and water retention on the compatibility of soils from the Argentinean Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research 54: 121–126.
  26. 26. Schertz DL, Moldenhauer WC, Livingston SJ, Weeisies GA, Hintz AE (1989) Effect of past soil erosion on crop productivity in Indiana. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44: 604–608.
  27. 27. Emerson WW (1995) Water-retention, organic-carbon and soil texture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33: 241–251.
  28. 28. Powlson DS, Hirsch PR, Brookes PC (2001) The role of soil micro-organisms in soil organic matter conservation in the tropics. Nutritional Cycling in Agroecosystems 61: 41–51.
  29. 29. Du ZL, Ren TS, Hu CS (2010) Tillage and residue removal effects on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in the North China Plain. Soil Science Society of American Journal 74: 196–202.
  30. 30. Pan GX, Li LQ, Zhang Q, Wang XK, Sun XB, et al. (2005) Organic carbon stock in topsoil of Jiangsu Province, China, and the recent trend of carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Sciences 17: 1–7.
  31. 31. Post WM, Pastor J, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1985) Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage. Nature 317: 613–616.
  32. 32. Gilliam FS, Dick DA, Kerr ML, Adams MB (2004) Effects of silvicultural practices on soil carbon and nitrogen in a nitrogen saturated Central Appalachian (USA) hardwood forest ecosystem. Environmental Management 33: S108–S119.
  33. 33. Pan GX, Zhao QG (2005) Study on evolution of organic carbon stock in agricultural soils of China: facing the challenge of global change and food security. Advances in Earth Science 20: 384–393 (in Chinese)..
  34. 34. Dersch G, Böhm K (2001) Effects of agronomic practices on the soil carbon storage potential in arable farming in Austria. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60: 49–55.