Growth and Nitrogen Uptake Characteristics Reveal Outbreak Mechanism of the Opportunistic Macroalga Gracilaria tenuistipitata

Chao Wang; Anping Lei; Kai Zhou; Zhengyu Hu; Wenlong Hao; Junda Yang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108980

Abstract

Macroalgae has bloomed in the brackish lake of Shenzhen Bay, China continuously from 2010 to 2014. Gracilaria tenuistipitata was identified as the causative macroalgal species. The aim of this study was to explore the outbreak mechanism of G. tenuistipitata, by studying the effects of salinity and nitrogen sources on growth, and the different nitrogen sources uptake characteristic. Our experimental design was based on environmental conditions observed in the bloom areas, and these main factors were simulated in the laboratory. Results showed that salinity 12 to 20 ‰ was suitable for G. tenuistipitata growth. When the nitrogen sources' (NH₄⁺, NO₃⁻) concentrations reached 40 µM or above, the growth rate of G. tenuistipitata was significantly higher. Algal biomass was higher (approximately 1.4 times) when cultured with NH₄⁺ than that with NO₃⁻ addition. Coincidentally, macroalgal bloom formed during times of moderate salinity (∼12 ‰) and high nitrogen conditions. The NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ uptake characteristic was studied to understand the potential mechanism of G. tenuistipitata bloom. NH₄⁺ uptake was best described by a linear, rate-unsaturated response, with the slope decreasing with time intervals. In contrast, NO₃⁻ uptake followed a rate-saturating mechanism best described by the Michaelis-Menten model, with kinetic parameters V_max = 37.2 µM g⁻¹ DM h⁻¹ and K_s = 61.5 µM. Further, based on the isotope ¹⁵N tracer method, we found that ¹⁵N from NH₄⁺ accumulated faster and reached an atom% twice than that of ¹⁵N from NO₃⁻, suggesting when both NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ were available, NH₄⁺ was assimilated more rapidly. The results of the present study indicate that in the estuarine environment, the combination of moderate salinity with high ammonium may stimulate bloom formation.

Citation: Wang C, Lei A, Zhou K, Hu Z, Hao W, Yang J (2014) Growth and Nitrogen Uptake Characteristics Reveal Outbreak Mechanism of the Opportunistic Macroalga Gracilaria tenuistipitata. PLoS ONE 9(10): e108980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980

Editor: Anna R. Armitage, Texas A&M University at Galveston, United States of America

Received: April 30, 2014; Accepted: August 13, 2014; Published: October 9, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Data have been deposited to Dryad and are available at: 10.5061/dryad.c3575.

Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170491), Shenzhen Municipal Basic research program (JCYJ20130329114940668) and a project from Shenzhen Marine Environment and Resources Monitoring Center(HHZB11025). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Macroalgal blooms have a broad range of ecological impacts and are considered to be harmful algal blooms [1]. Many studies have addressed the potential ecological and environmental consequences of macroalgal blooms [2], [3], including uncoupled biogeochemical cycles, degraded intertidal environment, reduced biodiversity, hypoxia or anoxia, destruction of coastal marine habitats (e.g., seagrass) and economic losses of marine industries (e.g., fisheries and tourism) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

In January 2013, red algae bloomed in the OCT North Lake of Shenzhen. Initially, a bloom of macroalgae occurred near the shore (Fig. 1A), then the lake surface became full of floating red macroalgae (Fig. 1B). Just 1 month later, from the surface to the bottom of the lake were filled with this kind of fast growing macroalgae and decomposition happened afterwards (Fig. 1C and D), becoming a serious issue for the local administration. The over-grown red algae were identified as Rhodophyta, Gigartinales, Gracilariaceae, Gracilaria, Gracilaria tenuistipitata (Fig. 1E and F). The damage caused by the bloom of G. tenuistipitata during this period included tourism and cleanup costs (about $ 50,000) (according to the local management office). Besides this, along with macroalgae decomposition, dead fish were also observed, indicating the lake ecological system has been damaged, to some extent.

Download:

Figure 1. The G. tenuistipitata in OCT North Lake.

A,B,C) The G. tenuistipitata bloom in OCT North Lake, D) The salvaged G. tenuistipitata, E) Samples of G. tenuistipitata collected, F) Observation and identification of macroalgae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.g001

Several hypotheses were proposed to explain the occurrence of macroalgal blooms in estuarine areas [10], [11], [12]. The OCT North Lake is connected to Shenzhen Bay which encountered strong anthropogenic influence, there are ∼0.2 million tons/day land-based fresh wastewater input [13], resulting in Shenzhen Bay as perennial brackish water (salinity 8–20‰) with high nitrogen loadings (essentially NH₄⁺) leading to eutrophication [14]. Considering the estuarine environment, the effect of salinity on growth of G. tenuistipitata was investigated in this study. The ability to uptake and assimilate nutrients rapidly is one of the characteristics of opportunistic species. Concerning mechanisms of algal blooms, the bioavailability of nitrogen is the most important among all of the biogenic elements [2], [3]. In coastal areas, nitrogen is available to macroalgae majorly in the forms Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN): ammonium (NH₄⁺) and nitrate (NO₃⁻). It is well known that fast growing species are positively affected by increased nutrient availability [15], thus, the effects of NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ on macroalgal growth were also investigated in this study.

A profound knowledge of the nitrogen uptake kinetics of G. tenuistipitata is important essentially for two reasons: It helps to study the algal potential assimilation efficiency and it is fundamental to assess its potential as a biofilter in estuaries and coastal waters [16], [17], [18]. There is a set of works studying the uptake kinetics in Marine macroalgae Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta species [19], [20], [21], [22]. The Michaelis-Menten equation was generally used to describe nutrient uptake by phytoplankton over the past few years [23], while the results varied depending on algal species and nutrients. Some macroalgae followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics, some did not, and some species did not show a clear way of assimilating NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻ [22]. Our work intended to provide more information regarding the nitrogen uptake dynamics of brackish water grown Rhodophyta species G. tenuistipitata in an attempt to elucidate the mechanism behind bloom formation. Short-term kinetics of NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ uptake were studied for the uptake characteristic of G. tenuistipitata. Nitrogen uptake has been studied for a variety of macroalgae, but the N species preference is still discussed [24], [25]. Elucidating the uptake strategy of G. tenuistipitata is essential because this red alga is the major bloom-forming species in nutrient-rich estuaries [26], [27]. One mechanism that may enhance bloom ability is the capability to choose and use different DIN species at the same time [19]. This isotope ¹⁵N tracer study was used to quantify uptake and assimilation strategy of NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ offered simultaneously in order to assess potential mechanisms that may enhance the bloom ability of G. tenuistipitata during irregular pulses of nitrogen sources.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Permission to investigation, public photos and sampling inside the OCT North Lake was approved through permits from the Overseas Chinese Town Holdings Company(OCT Group)and the Shenzhen government. Our field investigation did not involve endangered or protected species.

Algal material

During the macroalgal bloom, thalli of G. tenuistipitata were sampled from OCT North Lake (22°31′46.06″N, 113°58′40.32″E), Shenzhen, in January 2013. Healthy algal thalli collected were transported to the lab in a cool box within 4 h. Then they were flushed several times with artificial seawater to remove epiphytes, slime, sediment and small grazers, and then cultured in nutrient-deplete sterile artificial seawater [28] with vitamins and trace elements added according to the f/2 medium at salinity 12±1‰. Each algal sample was cultured for 3–5 days with bubbling air before the experiment. The cultures were kept at the salinity 12±1‰, temperature 25±0.5°C, with irradiance of 56 µE m⁻² S⁻¹ and photoperiod of 12∶12 (Light: Dark).

Salinity effects on growth rates

To determine the variable salinity effects on growth of G. tenuistipitata, we evaluated the Relative Growth Rates (RGR) of G. tenuistipitata at salinities of 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32 ‰ over a 15-day period. Approximately 0.1 g wet weight of G. tenuistipitata was added to 600 mL sterile f/2 enriched artificial seawater in a 1-L glass beaker at conditions described above. Each algal sample was assigned at random. The enriched medium was renewed every four days. Four replicates were used for each treatment. Every 4 days, the G. tenuistipitata thalli were blotted dry and the fresh weight determined, and RGR were calculated: RGR = (ln w₂-ln w₁)/Δt, where w₁ is the initial fresh mass and w₂ is the fresh mass after Δt days.

Nitrogen source effects on growth rates

The effects of nitrogen source on growth rates of G. tenuistipitata were tested for 15 days. For the nitrogen-effect experiment, two nitrogen sources, ammonium (NH₄Cl) and nitrate (NaNO₃) were applied. Nitrogen (NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻) concentrations were adjusted to 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM, treatments without nitrogen addition were taken as control groups. 30 µM phosphate (KH₂PO₄) was added to all treatments to avoid P limitation [29]. The fresh algal thalli of 0.1 g was randomly put in a 1-L glass beaker filled with 600 mL nutrient-deplete sterile artifical seawater at conditions described above. All glass material used during the experiment had been acid washed with 10% HCL to prevent possible nutrient contamination. Nutrient-enriched media were renewed every four days. Four replicates were used for each treatment.

Nitrogen source uptake

The nitrogen (NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺) uptake of G. tenuistipitata was determined by monitoring the nutrient depletion of the medium. The nutrient-deplete experimental artificial seawater was obtained from G. tenuistipitata culture medium mentioned above. After cultured alga for 5 days then NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations were monitored daily until their concentrations were below the detection limit (0.05 µM N L⁻¹), then culture media were filtered (GF/C) used as nutrient-depleted seawater medium. The uptake experiment was performed in 400 mL medium with nutrients added from stock solutions in 500-mL sterilized glass beakers. Uptake experiments with NO₃⁻ or NH₄⁺ were started with 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM respectively. To avoid P shortage, 30 µM PO₄³⁻ (KH₂PO₄) was added in the experiments. In order to determine the initial N concentrations, 2 ml seawater samples were taken before adding the macroalga. Further 2 ml seawater samples were collected at each time interval: 10, 20, 30 and 60 min. Seawater samples from both experiments were filtered (GF/C) and kept at −20°C until analysis (within 1 week). Analysis of NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ was carried out using a CleverChem 200 automated discrete analyzer (DeChem-Tech. GmbH, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Algal material was dried to a constant weight (48 h) in an oven kept at 60°C for dry weight. Uptake rates (V) were calculated from changes in substrate concentrations during each sampling interval using the equation: V = [(C₀×V₀) − (C_t×V_t)]/(t×DM), where C₀ and C_t are the substrate nutrient concentration, and V₀ and V_t are the volumes before and after a sampling period (t), and DM is algal dry biomass.

For estimation of the kinetic parameters of each N source, uptake rates were plotted together in V vs S curves. The V (uptake rate) against V/S (S = NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻ concentration) linear transformation of the Michaelis-Menten equation was used to determine whether the data could be described by Michaelis-Menten kinetics [30]. Data which showed saturation kinetics were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation: V = (V_max×C)/(Ks +C), using enzyme kinetics module (non-linear regression model) to analyze each replicate dataset according to the instructions of SigmaPlot 12.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The Michaelis–Menten equation and parameters, V_max (maximum uptake rate) and Ks (substrate concentration at which uptake proceeds at half the maximum rate) were obtained from the analysis.

Nitrogen preferences

After nitrogen starvation of 4–5 days, nitrogen uptake was estimated using stable isotopes as tracers. Uptake experiments were initiated by adding tracer amounts (50 µM N with 10 atom % ¹⁵N) of highly enriched (96–99%) ¹⁵N-labeled NO₃⁻ or NH₄⁺ to nutrient-deplete artificial seawater mentioned above placed in 30 ml acid-washed glass tubes. NO₃⁻ or NH₄⁺ were added in different ratios, with only one DIN species labeled with ¹⁵N per trial. After 1 h or 24 h, the algal thalli were briefly rinsed with deionized water, and dried at 60°C to constant weight (48 h), powdered with a Spex mixer (Spex CertiPrep, Inc., Edison, NJ), and analyzed for TN and ¹⁵N enrichment with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Europa Scientific Integra). Water samples were filtered (GF/C) and immediately analyzed for ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate. ¹⁵N enrichment was calculated based on the methods of Naldi and Wheeler [25].

Data analysis

Separate one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the responses of G. tenuistipitata to the different salinity treatments or nutrient (NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺) sources in terms of RGR. Data were initially examined for homogeneity of variance and F-tests were performed to test the significance of difference among treatments. Tukey test (equal variances) was then used to test the significance of difference between two specific treatments, if significant difference was found among treatments. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

Results

Effects of salinity and nitrogen sources on growth rate

After the 15-day culture, there were significant differences in the RGR associated with salinity (One-way ANOVA, P<0.01). RGR of G. tenuistipitata was relatively high with salinity ranging from 12 to 20 ‰, and the highest RGR was 4.2%/d at salinity 20 ‰. Biomasses significantly decreased when cultured in low (4 ‰) (Tukey's test, P<0.05) or high (>20‰) salinity seawater (Tukey's test, P<0.05) (Fig. 2A).

Download:

Figure 2. Effects of A) salinity, B) ammonium (NH₄⁺) and C) nitrate (NO₃⁻) on relative growth rate (RGR) of G. tenuistipitata after the 15-day culture.

A) f/2 medium was enriched, B and C) Phosphate was enriched in all treatments (30 µM). Means and SD are shown (n = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.g002

There were significant differences between RGR of G. tenuistipitata associated with nitrogen addition (NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻) after 15 days (One-way ANOVA, P<0.01). RGR was enhanced with increasing nitrogen (NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻) concentrations, when the nitrogen (NH₄⁺, NO₃⁻) was up to 40 µM, however, there was no significant difference in RGR with higher concentrations (40–100 µM) (P>0.05, Fig. 2B and C), with the highest RGR observed in treatments of 100 µM nitrogen (NH₄⁺ or NO₃⁻). Interestingly, the algal biomass was higher (approximately 1.5 times) in algae cultured with NH₄⁺ addition than that with NO₃⁻ addition, respectively (Fig. 2B and C).

Nitrogen (NH₄⁺or NO₃⁻) uptake

During the 1 h experiment, uptake rates (V_{0–1 h}) of G. tenuistipitata increased with NH₄⁺ concentration levels. Uptake efficiency decreased, as suggested by a gradual decline in the uptake rates of NH₄⁺ over sequential time intervals. The V-S of NH₄⁺ was linearly positive correlated, best described by rate-unsaturated model (Fig. 3A, B, C and D). The bloom-forming red alga showed the highest uptake rates about 32 µM g⁻¹DM h⁻¹ for the first 10 min at the concentration of 100 µM.

Download:

Figure 3. Ammonium (NH₄⁺) uptake rates by G. tenuistipitata at different time intervals and different substrate concentration.

Phosphate (30 µM) was added in all treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.g003

High NO₃⁻ uptake rates (V) of G. tenuistipitata were obtained from 0 to 10 min. Uptake rates for the NO₃⁻ decreased over the time intervals. With increasing concentrations of NO₃⁻, the uptake rates showed a tendency to saturation (Fig. 4A, B, C and D), and the V-S of NO₃⁻ was fitted to Michaelis-Menten model. Kinetic parameters (V_max and K_s) following the Michaelis-Menten equation for NO₃⁻ uptake by G. tenuistipitata at different time intervals during the 1 h experiment were shown in Table 1. The highest V_max and K_s values in the experiment with NO₃⁻ were 37.2 µ M g⁻¹ DM h⁻¹ and 61.5 µM.

Download:

Figure 4. Nitrate (NO₃⁻) uptake rates by G. tenuistipitata at different time intervals and different substrate concentration.

Phosphate (30 µM) was added in all treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.g004

Download:

Table 1. Kinetic parameters (V_max and K_s) of the Michaels-Menten equation obtained from the rates for uptake of Nitrate (NO₃⁻) by G. tenuistipitata at different time intervals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.t001

Nitrogen uptake preferences

The accumulation of ¹⁵N in G. tenuistipitata was rapid in 1 h, but decreased over time (Fig. 5A and B). ¹⁵N accumulation from sole source N cultures of NH₄⁺ increased faster and during 24 h time interval reached an enrichment twice that for ¹⁵N of NO₃⁻ (51.52 vs. 26.32 N enrichment, Fig. 5B). ¹⁵NH₄⁺ accumulation by G. tenuistipitata exceeded ¹⁵NO₃⁻ enrichment in all the two sources N cultures, regardless of the ratio of NH₄⁺ versus NO₃⁻ supplied and time. When the NH₄⁺ supply was lower than that of NO₃⁻ (20%:80%, 40%:60%), more ¹⁵NH₄⁺ was accumulated. These results revealed that when NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ were supplied simultaneously, G. tenuistipitata preferentially assimilate NH₄⁺.

Download:

Figure 5. Ammonium (NH₄⁺) and nitrate (NO₃⁻) enrichment by G. tenuistipitata at different time intervals.

A) 1 h and B) 24 h. The culture media contained 50 µM total N, but different proportions of NH₄⁺: NO₃⁻. Phosphate (10 µM) was added in all treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.g005

Discussion

Salinity in the estuarine or coastal areas is a reflection of the balance of land source flows and seawater from tidal flux. High tide and water exchange have changed the balance of freshwater and seawater and caused a change of salinity within the OCT North Lake. Salinity is an important influence on the growth, photosynthesis, and respiration of Gracilaria spp. [31], [32]. Bunsom found that salinity was the most crucial factor affecting G. tenuistipitata growth and the highest growth rate was at 25‰ [33], and it can tolerate salinities as higher as 39‰ [31]. In this study, the highest growth rate of G. tenuistipitata was at 20‰, instead of 25‰, perhaps due to perennial exposure to brackish water. Generally, lower salinities often inhibit growth of seaweeds, affect branching patterns and promote changes in their chemical composition [34], [35]. Our results showed the lowest growth rate was at 4‰, which was consistent with the result of low salinity growth inhibition. This study revealed that G. tenuistipitata from Lake Shenzhen grew well across a wide range of salinities (4–32‰). At the bloom period in January 2013, the salinity was 12.6‰, which was in the favorable range of this macroalga. Adaptability for low salinity might be one of the mechanisms of macroalgal bloom.

Nitrogen is one of the most important limiting factors for phytoplankton growth in aquatic systems [15], [36]. NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ are the principal forms of DIN in estuarine environments where nutrient supply is variable and unpredictable [37], [38]. NH₄⁺ is primarily supplied to estuaries by sewage spills and treated wastewater [39]; NO₃⁻ is the predominant source in riverine [40] and groundwater inputs [41]. The algae of the genus Gracilaria are characterized by a simple thallus with a high surface area to volume ratio, allowing for a rapid and efficient response to nutrient input, resulting in high rates of nutrient uptake and growth [15], [42]. Our studies reported the maximum average RGR of G. tenuistipitata was 5.68%/d at 100 µM NH₄⁺ and 4.01%/d at 100 µM NO₃⁻, compared with an RGR in control groups of less than 0.9%/d. The growth of G. tenuistipitata became faster with increased DIN (NH₄⁺or NO₃⁻) concentration. Nutrient enrichment, due to high N inputs via anthropogenic injection and regenerative processes, has contributed to enhanced growth of opportunistic macroalgae [2]. During the bloom period, in the OCT North Lake, nitrogen in shallow waters is often in the form of NH₄⁺ with average concentration of 60 µM, and NO₃⁻ of 35 µM, P (PO₄³⁻) of 5 µM. DIN concentration was in the range of significantly positive stimulating this alga growth, while P could not meet this algal need according to the Redfield N (16): P (1) ratio, indicating that P was limiting during the bloom.

Opportunistic macroalgae, often have higher nitrogen uptake rates than other more specialized algae [43]. A high uptake rate allows these opportunistic macroalgae to use nutrients efficiently [44]. With respect to uptake rate, some species followed the classic Michaelis-Menten kinetics for N uptake [22], [23], while others have exhibited sustained linear, rate-unsaturated uptake mainly due to eutrophic/oligotrophic level [45], [46], [22], [48], [49]. Normally, NO₃⁻ uptake shows saturation kinetics [47]. Smit [48] investigated nitrogen uptake by Gracilaria gracilis and concluded that NO₃⁻ uptake followed a rate-saturating mechanism was best described by the Michaelis-Menten model. A set of studies have used extraordinarily high NH₄⁺ concentration (500 µM above levels) as Table 2 shows, which is toxic to many marine organisms [50], but the results were still positively accorded with Michaelis-Menten or linear models. The max DIN concentration (100 µM) in this study was based on the in situ environmental concentrations, and the principal finding about this long-term brackish water lived macroalga for the first time that the NH₄⁺ uptake of G. tenuistipitata was linear, while the uptake kinetics of NO₃⁻ were distinctly different from those of NH₄⁺. The uptake rate of NO₃⁻ over time fitted Michaelis-Menten kinetics. This indicated high uptake rate and affinity capability for NH₄⁺. During the bloom, NH₄⁺ was abundant in OCT North Lake, which might be another reason for macroalgal bloomed.

Download:

Table 2. Comparison of V_max (µM g⁻¹ DM h⁻¹), K_S (µM) values and substrate range (µM) for several Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta species in the marine or estuarine environment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108980.t002

Generally, nitrogen uptake in macroalgae depends on intracellular levels [15] and environmental nitrogen concentrations [51]. Biological factors such as metabolism, morphology, tissue type, the age of the algae, and nutritional history [42], [52], [53], all influence nitrogen uptake by macroalgae. The DIN uptake pattern can be explained by different nitrogen assimilation mechanisms. The process of nitrogen uptake and assimilation in macroalgae involves transport from the water across the cell membrane and then assimilation into organic compounds, followed by incorporation into proteins and macromolecules for growth [40]. For NO₃⁻, there is the additional step of reduction to NH₄⁺ by nitrate reductase after uptake [54]. One explanation for NH₄⁺ affinity may be that energy required for nitrate reduction could be saved [53].

Two parameters of Michaelis-Menten kinetics, namely V_max and K_s, contain ecologically relevant information relating to the nutrient uptake ability of a species under conditions of varying nutrient availability. In this study, the V_max was 37.2 and K_s was 61.5 for uptake of NO₃⁻ by G. tenuistipitatain in Table 1. While, the V_max declined over time intervals, indicating initially very high uptake rates and lower sustained uptake rates. Previous work addressed the uptake differences between Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta species in the marine or estuarine environment [19], [20], [21], [22], [48], [49], [55], [56]. Commonly, Chlorophyta follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics for NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ [20], [21], [56], Rhodophyta differ depending on the species [19], [22], [48]. Higher V_max were found in Chlorophyta for NO₃⁻ [20], [21]. G. tenuistipitata has the relatively higher V_max in Rhodophyta species, implying higher assimilating and storing capability for NO₃⁻. However, the V_max/K_s value was 0.6, less than 1, indicating the competitive advantage for NO₃⁻ is not so obvious compared with other Rhodophyta species. During the bloom, NO₃⁻ concentration was relatively low, while NH₄⁺ was abundant. What's more, resilience to low salinities might be a principal reason for bloom of G. tenuistipitata.

Environmental factors, including temperature, salinity, nutrient levels and other relevant competitors, are principally responsible for regulating macroalgal bloom occurrence [6], [7]. Because Shenzhen Bay is in the subtropical zone, the water temperature is relatively constant between day and night, without great changes between different months, so our research did not focus on its influence on algal RGR, with attention to the effect of salinity and DIN. Besides, the competition for resources (especially nutrients) is ubiquitous in marine phytoplankton [55], and the chemical defense system is another important potential mechanism for algal competition. Allelopathy, one type of chemical defense competition between plants, can be a potent influential factor. Xu et al. [57] found allelopathic interactions happened between green tide-forming species Ulva prolifera and macroalga Gracilaria lichvoides, indicating that some allelochemicals released by both of the macroalgae could account for the physiological inhibition of growth. In our study, there is only one species, namely G. tenuistipitata, lived and bloomed in the OCT North Lake until 2014, no other macroalga was found. So we neglect the competing role among macroalgae.

From our ¹⁵N tracer study, we found the opportunistic macroalga G. tenuistipitata actively utilizes multiple DIN species simultaneously, and prefers the most energetically efficient (NH₄⁺) when available. Other previous reports have also found NH₄⁺ uptake preference. D'Elia and DeBoer found the priority of NH₄⁺ uptake, even in very low concentrations (∼5 µM), and its presence seriously deceased the uptake of NO₃⁻ by Gracilaria foliifera (Forsskal) Borgesen [58], while Hanisak and Harlin determined that only 1 µM NH₄⁺ was enough to decrease NO₃⁻ uptake in Codium fragile (van Goor) Silva [59]. Haines and Wheeler showed that NO₃⁻ uptake by Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen) Lamouroux was reduced by 50% in the presence of about 18 µM NH₄⁺ [60]. Our study also found a decrease of NO₃⁻ uptake when NH₄⁺ was present. The result suggested that when NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ were supplied in equal or less ratio concentrations simultaneously, more NH₄⁺ was taken up and assimilated.

From the present study, three key conclusions were obtained: i) the growth of G. tenuistipitata was regulated by salinity and N availability in environment. Its tolerance of relatively low salinity in estuarine environment seems to be a principal factor for its bloom rather than the other species. Its high growth rate and extraordinary capabilities for utilizing nutrients, like DIN likely contribute to macroalgal outbreaks; ii) The DIN: NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ uptake kinetics of G. tenuistipitata are different. NH₄⁺ uptake demonstrated a rate-unsaturated response, but NO₃⁻ uptake followed a rate-saturating mechanism which fit the Michaelis-Menten model, with kinetic parameters V_max (37.2 µ M g⁻¹ DM h⁻¹) and K_s (61.5 µ M), indicating a higher uptake efficiency of NH₄⁺ than NO₃⁻; iii) The strategy of G. tenuistipitata assimilating different forms of DIN showed that NH₄⁺ incorporated faster than NO₃⁻. We propose that when NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ were supplied simultaneously, G. tenuistipitata preferentially assimilated NH₄⁺. One mechanism that may enhance bloom ability is the strategy to choose and use different DIN in estuarine environments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CW AL KZ ZH. Performed the experiments: CW WH JY. Analyzed the data: CW AL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CW AL WH JY. Wrote the paper: CW.

References

1. ECOHAB (1995) The Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algae Blooms. WHOI, Woods Hole, MA: A National Research Agenda.
2. Fletcher RL (1996) The occurrence of “green tides”: a review. In: Schramm. W PHNPHE, editor. Marine benthic vegetation Recent changes and the effects of eutrophication. Berlin, Germany: Springer. pp. 7–43.
3. Valiela I, McClelland J, Hauxwell J, Behr PJ, Hersh D, et al. (1997) Macroalgal blooms in shallow estuaries: Controls and ecophysiological and ecosystem consequences. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1105–1118.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Wang C, Yu RC, Zhou MJ (2011) Acute toxicity of live and decomposing green alga Ulva prolifera to abalone Haliotis discus hannai. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 29: 541–546.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Wang C, Yu RC, Zhou MJ (2012) Effects of the decomposing green macroalga Ulva prolifera on the growth of four red-tide species. Harmful Algae 16: 12–19.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Hernandez I, Peralta G, PerezLlorens JL, Vergara JJ, Niell FX (1997) Biomass and dynamics of growth of Ulva species in Palmones river estuary. Journal of Phycology 33: 764–772.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. McGlathery KJ (2001) Macroalgal blooms contribute to the decline of seagrass in nutrient-enriched coastal waters. Journal of Phycology 37: 453–456.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Nelson TA, Lee A (2001) A manipulative experiment demonstrates that blooms of the macroalga Ulvaria obscura can reduce eelgrass shoot density. Aquatic Botany 71: 149–154.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Franz DR, Friedman I (2002) Effects of a macroalgal mat (Ulva lactuca) on estuarine sand flat copepods: an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 271: 209–226.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Kirst GO (1995) Influence of salinity on algal ecosystems. In: Eds. W. Wiessner ESaCS, editor. In 'Algae, Environment and Human Affairs. England: Biopress: Bristol. pp. 123–142.
11. Cloern JE (1987) Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries. Continental Shelf Research 7: 1367–1381.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Chan TU, Hamilton P (2001) Effect of freshwater flow on the succession and biomass of phytoplankton in a seasonal estuary. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 869–884.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Liu G, Lai LW (2013) the Shenzhen bay is sick. Jing newspaper. Available: http://jb.sznews.com/html/2013-10/20/content_2655847.htm
14. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhou K, Zhang J, Li X (2010) Evaluation on temporal and spatial distribution of nutrients and potential eutrophication in Shenzhen Bay. Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 19(2): 253–261.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 142: 261–272.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Carneiro MAA, Freire FAdM, Marinho-Soriano E (2011) Study on biofiltration capacity and kinetics of nutrient uptake by Gracilaria cervicornis (Turner) J. Agardh (Rhodophyta, Gracilariaceae). Revista Brasileira De Farmacognosia-Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 21: 329–333.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Marinho-Soriano E, Panucci RA, Carneiro MAA, Pereira DC (2009) Evaluation of Gracilaria caudata J. Agardh for bioremediation of nutrients from shrimp farming wastewater. Bioresource Technology 100: 6192–6198.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Yang YF, Fei XG, Song JM, Hu HY, Wang GC, et al. (2006) Growth of Gracilaria lemaneiformis under different cultivation conditions and its effects on nutrient removal in Chinese coastal waters. Aquaculture 254: 248–255.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Thomas TE, Harrison PJ (1987) Rapid ammonium uptake and nitrogen interactions in 5 intertidal seaweeds grown under field conditions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 107: 1–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Runcie JW, Ritchie RJ, Larkum AW (2003) Uptake kinetics and assimilation of inorganic nitrogen by Catenella nipae and Ulva lactuca. Aquatic Botany 76: 155–174.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Luo MB, Liu F, Xu ZL (2012) Growth and nutrient uptake capacity of two co-occurring species, Ulva prolifera and Ulva linza. Aquatic Botany 100: 18–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Buschmann AH, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2011) Nitrogen uptake responses of Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss under combined and single addition of nitrate and ammonium. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 407: 190–199.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Smith SL, Yamanaka Y, Pahlow M, Oschlies A (2009) Optimal uptake kinetics: physiological acclimation explains the pattern of nitrate uptake by phytoplankton in the ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 384: 1–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Lotze HK, Schramm W (2000) Ecophysiological traits explain species dominance patterns in macroalgal blooms. Journal of Phycology 36: 287–295.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Naldi M, Wheeler PA (2002) N-15 measurements of ammonium and nitrate uptake by Ulva fenestrata (chlorophyta) and Gracilaria pacifica (rhodophyta): Comparison of net nutrient disappearance, release of ammonium and nitrate, and N-15 accumulation in algal tissue. Journal of Phycology 38: 135–144.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Raffaelli D, Balls P, Way S, Patterson IJ, Hohmann S, et al. (1999) Major long-term changes in the ecology of the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland; how important are physical factors? Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9: 219–236.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Valiela I, Foreman K, Lamontagne M, Hersh D, Costa J, et al. (1992) Couplings of watersheds and coastal waters-sources and consequences of nutrient enrichment in waquoit bay, Massachusetts. Estuaries 15: 443–457.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Guillard RRL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH, editors. Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 26–60.
29. Bjornsater BR, Wheeler PA (1990) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth and tissue composition of Ulva-fenestrata and Enteromorpha-intestinalis (Ulvales,Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 26: 603–611.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Dowd JE, Riggs DS (1965) A comparison of estimates of michaelis-menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations. Journal of Biological Chemistry 240: 863–&.
31. Israel A, Martinez-Goss M, Friedlander M (1999) Effect of salinity and pH on growth and agar yield of Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui in laboratory and outdoor cultivation. Journal of Applied Phycology 11: 543–549.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. He LH, Wu M, Qian PY, Zhu MY (2002) Effects of co-culture and salinity on the growth and agar yield of Gracilaria tenuistipitata var liui Zhang et Xia. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 20: 365–370.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Bunsom C, Prathep A (2012) Effects of salinity, light intensity and sediment on growth, pigments, agar production and reproduction in Gracilaria tenuistipitata from Songkhla Lagoon in Thailand. Phycological Research 60: 169–178.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Ekman P, Yu SK, Pedersen M (1991) Effects of altered salinity, darkness and algal nutrient status on floridoside and starch content, alpha-galatosidase activity and agar yield of cultivated gracilaria sordida. British Phycological Journal 26: 123–131.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Choi HG, Kim YS, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Park EJ, et al. (2006) Effects of temperature and salinity on the growth of Gracilaria verrucosa and G-chorda, with the potential for mariculture in Korea. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 269–277.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Kim JK, Kraemer GP, Neefus CD, Chung IK, Yarish C (2007) Effects of temperature and ammonium on growth, pigment production and nitrogen uptake by four species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) native to the New England coast. Journal of Applied Phycology 19: 431–440.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Pinchetti JLG, Fernandez ED, Diez PM, Reina GG (1998) Nitrogen availability influences the biochemical composition and photosynthesis of tank-cultivated Ulva rigida (Chlorophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 383–389.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Fong P, Donohoe RM, Zedler JB (1994) Nutrient concentration in tissue of the macroalga enteromorpha as a function of nutrient history-an experimental evaluation using field microcosms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 273–281.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Waite TD, Mitchell R (1972) Role of benthic plants in fertilized estuary. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division-Asce 98: 763–&.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. McGlathery KJ, Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Changes in intracellular nitrogen pools and feedback controls on nitrogen uptake in Chaetomorpha linum (chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 32: 393–401.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. McClelland JW, Valiela I (1998) Changes in food web structure under the influence of increased anthropogenic nitrogen inputs to estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 168: 259–271.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Pedersen MF (1994) Transient ammonium uptake in the macroalga Ulva-lactuca (Chlorophyta) - nature, regulation, and the consequences for choice of measuring technique. Journal of Phycology 30: 980–986.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1997) Nutrient control of estuarine macroalgae: growth strategy and the balance between nitrogen requirements and uptake. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161: 155–163.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Phillips JC, Hurd CL (2004) Kinetics of nitrate, ammonium, and urea uptake by four intertidal seaweeds from New Zealand. Journal of Phycology 40: 534–545.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Touchette BW, Burkholder JM (2000) Review of nitrogen and phosphorus metabolism in seagrasses. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250: 133–167.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Wen SS, Zhang HY, He WH, Zhang QJ, Xu SN, et al. (2008) Study on NH₄-N removing efficiency and kinetics in Gracilaria asiatica. Journal of Fisheries of China 32(5): 754–803.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Delia CF, Deboer JA (1978) Nutritional studies of 2 red algae.2. kinetics of ammonium and nitrate uptake. Journal of Phycology 14: 266–272.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Smit AJ (2002) Nitrogen uptake by Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta): Adaptations to a temporally variable nitrogen environment. Botanica Marina 45: 196–209.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Li J, Huang L, Guo F, Cai A, Zheng Y (2007) Absorption of N, P Nutrients by Gracilaria tenuistipitata and its resistant effect on the outbreak of red tide. Journal of Xiamen U niversity (Natural Science) 46(2): 221–225.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Randall DJ, Tsui TKN (2002) Ammonia toxicity in fish. Marine Pollution Bulletin 45: 17–23.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Harrison PJ, Hurd CL (2001) Nutrient physiology of seaweeds: Application of concepts to aquaculture. Cahiers De Biologie Marine 42: 71–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, et al. (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modem mariculture. Aquaculture 231: 361–391.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Rosenberg G, Ramus J (1984) Uptake of inorganic nitrogen and seaweed surface-area-vloume ratios. Aquatic Botany 19: 65–72.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Hurd CL, Berges JA, Osborne J, Harrison PJ (1995) An in-vitro nitrate reductase assay for marine macroalgae - optimization and characterization of the enzyme for fucus-gardneri (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology 31: 835–843.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Zhou MJ, Zhu MY (2006) Progress of the Project“Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms in China”. Advances in Earth Science 7: 673–679.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Gordon DM, Birch PB, McComb AJ (1981) Effects of inoganic phosphorus and nitrogen on the growth of estuarine cladophora in culture. Botanica Marina 24: 93–106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Xu D, Gao ZQ, Zhang XW, Fan X, Wang YT (2012) Allelopathic Interactions between the Opportunistic Species Ulva prolifera and the Native Macroalga Gracilaria lichvoides. Plos one 10.1371/journal.pone.0033648.
58. Delia CF, Deboer JA (1978) Nutritional studies of 2 red algae.2. kinetics of ammonium and nitrate uptake. Journal of Phycology 14: 266–272.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Hanisak MD, Harlin MM (1978) Uptake of inoganic nitrogen by codium-fragile subsp tomentosoides (Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 14: 450–454.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Haines KC, Wheeler PA (1978) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by marine macrophytes hypnea-musciformis (Rhodophyta) and macrocystis-pyrifera (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology 14: 319–324.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. ECOHAB (1995) The Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algae Blooms. WHOI, Woods Hole, MA: A National Research Agenda.

[ref2] 2. Fletcher RL (1996) The occurrence of “green tides”: a review. In: Schramm. W PHNPHE, editor. Marine benthic vegetation Recent changes and the effects of eutrophication. Berlin, Germany: Springer. pp. 7–43.

[ref3] 3. Valiela I, McClelland J, Hauxwell J, Behr PJ, Hersh D, et al. (1997) Macroalgal blooms in shallow estuaries: Controls and ecophysiological and ecosystem consequences. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1105–1118.
View Article
Google Scholar

[4] View Article

[5] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Wang C, Yu RC, Zhou MJ (2011) Acute toxicity of live and decomposing green alga Ulva prolifera to abalone Haliotis discus hannai. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 29: 541–546.
View Article
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Wang C, Yu RC, Zhou MJ (2012) Effects of the decomposing green macroalga Ulva prolifera on the growth of four red-tide species. Harmful Algae 16: 12–19.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hernandez I, Peralta G, PerezLlorens JL, Vergara JJ, Niell FX (1997) Biomass and dynamics of growth of Ulva species in Palmones river estuary. Journal of Phycology 33: 764–772.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. McGlathery KJ (2001) Macroalgal blooms contribute to the decline of seagrass in nutrient-enriched coastal waters. Journal of Phycology 37: 453–456.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Nelson TA, Lee A (2001) A manipulative experiment demonstrates that blooms of the macroalga Ulvaria obscura can reduce eelgrass shoot density. Aquatic Botany 71: 149–154.
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Franz DR, Friedman I (2002) Effects of a macroalgal mat (Ulva lactuca) on estuarine sand flat copepods: an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 271: 209–226.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Kirst GO (1995) Influence of salinity on algal ecosystems. In: Eds. W. Wiessner ESaCS, editor. In 'Algae, Environment and Human Affairs. England: Biopress: Bristol. pp. 123–142.

[ref11] 11. Cloern JE (1987) Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries. Continental Shelf Research 7: 1367–1381.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Chan TU, Hamilton P (2001) Effect of freshwater flow on the succession and biomass of phytoplankton in a seasonal estuary. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 869–884.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Liu G, Lai LW (2013) the Shenzhen bay is sick. Jing newspaper. Available: http://jb.sznews.com/html/2013-10/20/content_2655847.htm

[ref14] 14. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhou K, Zhang J, Li X (2010) Evaluation on temporal and spatial distribution of nutrients and potential eutrophication in Shenzhen Bay. Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 19(2): 253–261.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 142: 261–272.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Carneiro MAA, Freire FAdM, Marinho-Soriano E (2011) Study on biofiltration capacity and kinetics of nutrient uptake by Gracilaria cervicornis (Turner) J. Agardh (Rhodophyta, Gracilariaceae). Revista Brasileira De Farmacognosia-Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 21: 329–333.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Marinho-Soriano E, Panucci RA, Carneiro MAA, Pereira DC (2009) Evaluation of Gracilaria caudata J. Agardh for bioremediation of nutrients from shrimp farming wastewater. Bioresource Technology 100: 6192–6198.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Yang YF, Fei XG, Song JM, Hu HY, Wang GC, et al. (2006) Growth of Gracilaria lemaneiformis under different cultivation conditions and its effects on nutrient removal in Chinese coastal waters. Aquaculture 254: 248–255.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Thomas TE, Harrison PJ (1987) Rapid ammonium uptake and nitrogen interactions in 5 intertidal seaweeds grown under field conditions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 107: 1–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Runcie JW, Ritchie RJ, Larkum AW (2003) Uptake kinetics and assimilation of inorganic nitrogen by Catenella nipae and Ulva lactuca. Aquatic Botany 76: 155–174.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Luo MB, Liu F, Xu ZL (2012) Growth and nutrient uptake capacity of two co-occurring species, Ulva prolifera and Ulva linza. Aquatic Botany 100: 18–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Buschmann AH, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2011) Nitrogen uptake responses of Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss under combined and single addition of nitrate and ammonium. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 407: 190–199.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Smith SL, Yamanaka Y, Pahlow M, Oschlies A (2009) Optimal uptake kinetics: physiological acclimation explains the pattern of nitrate uptake by phytoplankton in the ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 384: 1–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lotze HK, Schramm W (2000) Ecophysiological traits explain species dominance patterns in macroalgal blooms. Journal of Phycology 36: 287–295.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Naldi M, Wheeler PA (2002) N-15 measurements of ammonium and nitrate uptake by Ulva fenestrata (chlorophyta) and Gracilaria pacifica (rhodophyta): Comparison of net nutrient disappearance, release of ammonium and nitrate, and N-15 accumulation in algal tissue. Journal of Phycology 38: 135–144.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Raffaelli D, Balls P, Way S, Patterson IJ, Hohmann S, et al. (1999) Major long-term changes in the ecology of the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland; how important are physical factors? Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9: 219–236.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Valiela I, Foreman K, Lamontagne M, Hersh D, Costa J, et al. (1992) Couplings of watersheds and coastal waters-sources and consequences of nutrient enrichment in waquoit bay, Massachusetts. Estuaries 15: 443–457.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Guillard RRL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH, editors. Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 26–60.

[ref29] 29. Bjornsater BR, Wheeler PA (1990) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth and tissue composition of Ulva-fenestrata and Enteromorpha-intestinalis (Ulvales,Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 26: 603–611.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Dowd JE, Riggs DS (1965) A comparison of estimates of michaelis-menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations. Journal of Biological Chemistry 240: 863–&.

[ref31] 31. Israel A, Martinez-Goss M, Friedlander M (1999) Effect of salinity and pH on growth and agar yield of Gracilaria tenuistipitata var. liui in laboratory and outdoor cultivation. Journal of Applied Phycology 11: 543–549.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. He LH, Wu M, Qian PY, Zhu MY (2002) Effects of co-culture and salinity on the growth and agar yield of Gracilaria tenuistipitata var liui Zhang et Xia. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 20: 365–370.
View Article
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Bunsom C, Prathep A (2012) Effects of salinity, light intensity and sediment on growth, pigments, agar production and reproduction in Gracilaria tenuistipitata from Songkhla Lagoon in Thailand. Phycological Research 60: 169–178.
View Article
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ekman P, Yu SK, Pedersen M (1991) Effects of altered salinity, darkness and algal nutrient status on floridoside and starch content, alpha-galatosidase activity and agar yield of cultivated gracilaria sordida. British Phycological Journal 26: 123–131.
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Choi HG, Kim YS, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Park EJ, et al. (2006) Effects of temperature and salinity on the growth of Gracilaria verrucosa and G-chorda, with the potential for mariculture in Korea. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 269–277.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Kim JK, Kraemer GP, Neefus CD, Chung IK, Yarish C (2007) Effects of temperature and ammonium on growth, pigment production and nitrogen uptake by four species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) native to the New England coast. Journal of Applied Phycology 19: 431–440.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Pinchetti JLG, Fernandez ED, Diez PM, Reina GG (1998) Nitrogen availability influences the biochemical composition and photosynthesis of tank-cultivated Ulva rigida (Chlorophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 383–389.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Fong P, Donohoe RM, Zedler JB (1994) Nutrient concentration in tissue of the macroalga enteromorpha as a function of nutrient history-an experimental evaluation using field microcosms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 273–281.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Waite TD, Mitchell R (1972) Role of benthic plants in fertilized estuary. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division-Asce 98: 763–&.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. McGlathery KJ, Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Changes in intracellular nitrogen pools and feedback controls on nitrogen uptake in Chaetomorpha linum (chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 32: 393–401.
View Article
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. McClelland JW, Valiela I (1998) Changes in food web structure under the influence of increased anthropogenic nitrogen inputs to estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 168: 259–271.
View Article
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Pedersen MF (1994) Transient ammonium uptake in the macroalga Ulva-lactuca (Chlorophyta) - nature, regulation, and the consequences for choice of measuring technique. Journal of Phycology 30: 980–986.
View Article
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1997) Nutrient control of estuarine macroalgae: growth strategy and the balance between nitrogen requirements and uptake. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161: 155–163.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Phillips JC, Hurd CL (2004) Kinetics of nitrate, ammonium, and urea uptake by four intertidal seaweeds from New Zealand. Journal of Phycology 40: 534–545.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Touchette BW, Burkholder JM (2000) Review of nitrogen and phosphorus metabolism in seagrasses. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250: 133–167.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Wen SS, Zhang HY, He WH, Zhang QJ, Xu SN, et al. (2008) Study on NH₄-N removing efficiency and kinetics in Gracilaria asiatica. Journal of Fisheries of China 32(5): 754–803.
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Delia CF, Deboer JA (1978) Nutritional studies of 2 red algae.2. kinetics of ammonium and nitrate uptake. Journal of Phycology 14: 266–272.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Smit AJ (2002) Nitrogen uptake by Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta): Adaptations to a temporally variable nitrogen environment. Botanica Marina 45: 196–209.
View Article
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Li J, Huang L, Guo F, Cai A, Zheng Y (2007) Absorption of N, P Nutrients by Gracilaria tenuistipitata and its resistant effect on the outbreak of red tide. Journal of Xiamen U niversity (Natural Science) 46(2): 221–225.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Randall DJ, Tsui TKN (2002) Ammonia toxicity in fish. Marine Pollution Bulletin 45: 17–23.
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Harrison PJ, Hurd CL (2001) Nutrient physiology of seaweeds: Application of concepts to aquaculture. Cahiers De Biologie Marine 42: 71–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, et al. (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modem mariculture. Aquaculture 231: 361–391.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Rosenberg G, Ramus J (1984) Uptake of inorganic nitrogen and seaweed surface-area-vloume ratios. Aquatic Botany 19: 65–72.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Hurd CL, Berges JA, Osborne J, Harrison PJ (1995) An in-vitro nitrate reductase assay for marine macroalgae - optimization and characterization of the enzyme for fucus-gardneri (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology 31: 835–843.
View Article
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Zhou MJ, Zhu MY (2006) Progress of the Project“Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms in China”. Advances in Earth Science 7: 673–679.
View Article
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Gordon DM, Birch PB, McComb AJ (1981) Effects of inoganic phosphorus and nitrogen on the growth of estuarine cladophora in culture. Botanica Marina 24: 93–106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Xu D, Gao ZQ, Zhang XW, Fan X, Wang YT (2012) Allelopathic Interactions between the Opportunistic Species Ulva prolifera and the Native Macroalga Gracilaria lichvoides. Plos one 10.1371/journal.pone.0033648.

[ref58] 58. Delia CF, Deboer JA (1978) Nutritional studies of 2 red algae.2. kinetics of ammonium and nitrate uptake. Journal of Phycology 14: 266–272.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Hanisak MD, Harlin MM (1978) Uptake of inoganic nitrogen by codium-fragile subsp tomentosoides (Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 14: 450–454.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Haines KC, Wheeler PA (1978) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by marine macrophytes hypnea-musciformis (Rhodophyta) and macrocystis-pyrifera (Phaeophyta). Journal of Phycology 14: 319–324.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Algal material

Salinity effects on growth rates

Nitrogen source effects on growth rates

Nitrogen source uptake

Nitrogen preferences

Data analysis

Results

Effects of salinity and nitrogen sources on growth rate

Nitrogen (NH4+or NO3−) uptake

Nitrogen uptake preferences

Discussion

Author Contributions

References

Nitrogen (NH₄⁺or NO₃⁻) uptake