Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Genotyping of the Duffy Blood Group among Plasmodium knowlesi-Infected Patients in Malaysia

  • Jeremy Ryan De Silva,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Yee Ling Lau,

    Affiliations Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tropical Disease Research and Education Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Mun Yik Fong

    fongmy@um.edu.my

    Affiliations Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tropical Disease Research and Education Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯

Abstract

The Duffy blood group is of major interest in clinical medicine as it plays an important role in Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax infection. In the present study, the distribution of Duffy blood group genotypes and allelic frequencies among P. knowlesi infected patients as well as healthy individuals in Peninsular Malaysia were determined. The blood group of 60 healthy blood donors and 51 P. knowlesi malaria patients were genotyped using allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASP-PCR). The data was analyzed using Fisher's exact test in order to assess the significance of the variables. Our results show a high proportion of the FY*A/FY*A genotype (>85% for both groups) and a high frequency of the FY*A allele (>90% for both groups). The FY*A/FY*A genotype was the most predominant genotype in both infected and healthy blood samples. The genotype frequency did not differ significantly between the donor blood and the malaria patient groups. Also, there was no significant correlation between susceptibility to P. knowlesi infection with any Duffy blood genotype.

Citation: De Silva JR, Lau YL, Fong MY (2014) Genotyping of the Duffy Blood Group among Plasmodium knowlesi-Infected Patients in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 9(9): e108951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108951

Editor: Laurent Rénia, Agency for Science, Technology and Research - Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore

Received: June 17, 2014; Accepted: August 26, 2014; Published: September 30, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 De Silva et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All data are included within the paper.

Funding: This study was funded by the University of Malaya High Impact Research Fund, UM-MOHE (E000050 : UM.C/HIR/MOHE/MED/16). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The Duffy blood group, also known as the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC), is a group of polymorphic molecules located on the exterior portion of the red blood cell (RBC) membrane. The Duffy blood group is of particular importance due to the nature of the Duffy antigen being an obligatory receptor for the invasion of the malaria parasite P. vivax and P. knowlesi into erythrocytes [1]. Besides being a receptor for various chemokines that facilitate chemokine induced pathways in the body, the Duffy blood group also plays a role in transfusion medicine as antibodies against Duffy antigens have been shown to be responsible for several cases of hemolytic transfusion compatibility and hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

The Duffy blood group was initially reported by Cutbush in 1950, where he described the reactivity of an antibody found in a multitransfused hemophiliac male patient who possessed an alloantibody against an antigen, then denoted as Fya. An allelic form of the antigen, Fyb, was described a year later [8]. The FY is a single copy gene composed of two exons that encode a protein of 336 amino acids [9]. The FY locus is located on chromosome 1 and is characterized by three main alleles, FY*A, FY*B, and FY*BES.

FY*A and FY*B are codominant alleles distinguished by a mutation (125G>A) which gives rise to the Fya and Fyb antigens [10]. The antigens differ between each other by one amino acid substitution, the replacement of glycine for aspartic acid at residue 42 of the extracellular domain of the antigen (Gly42Asp) [11]. These two alleles confer the common Duffy phenotypes Fy(a+b+), Fy(a+b−) and Fy(a−b+).

The FY*BES allele differs from the FY*B allele by a substitution from T to C at the GATA box motif of the FY*B promoter (−33 T>C). This mutation results in a disruption at the binding site of the GATA-1 erythroid transcription factor which in turn results in the loss of FY expression in the erythroid lineage but does not affect other tissues [12]. Homozygozity of the FY*BES allele results in the phenotype Fy(a−b−) which has been shown to render RBC resistance to P. vivax malarial infection. This phenotype is more prevalent in human populations of African lineage but is quite rare in Caucasian or Asian populations.

Molecular characterization of the FY alleles has allowed for the development of Duffy genotyping by PCR-based approaches such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [9] and allele specific PCR (ASP-PCR) [13].

Natural transmission of the monkey malaria parasite P. knowlesi to human was first reported in an American man who had returned from central Peninsular Malaysia in 1965. This was followed by a second case report in southern Peninsular Malaysia 5 years later [14]. Since 2004, after the discovery of a large number of infected patients in Borneo Malaysia [15], there has been an increasing number of naturally acquired P. knowlesi malaria among humans in several other Asian countries such as Thailand, The Philippines and Singapore. In Peninsular Malaysia, more than 300 human cases have been detected since 2005 [16], [17], [18].

The aim of the present study is to analyze the distribution of the Duffy genotypes and allelic frequencies of P. knowlesi infected patients as well as healthy donor samples in Peninsular Malaysia.

Materials and Methods

Blood samples and sample collection

Fifty one P. knowlesi infected blood samples were collected from patients admitted to the University of Malaya Medical Center (UMMC) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from July 2008 till July 2012. Patient blood samples were confirmed for P. knowlesi malaria infection by several tests including microscopic examination, BinaxNOW malaria rapid diagnostic test (Inverness Medical International, Stockport, United Kingdom) and PCR based on the Plasmodium small subunit ribosomal RNA genes [15]. A control group of blood samples (n = 60) obtained from healthy donors was included in the study. The donors consists of ‘orang asli settlement samples as well as patient samples from UMMC hospital that were diagnosed as malaria negative. The ‘orang asli’ samples were taken randomly from various settlements around Malaysia. All samples had no previous malarial infections and all blood samples were screened by PCR.

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Malaya Medical Centre Ethic Committee (MEC Ref. No. 817.18) and informed verbal consent from the donor or the next of kin was obtained for use of these samples in diagnosis. Written consent was found to be unnecessary as verbal consent would be sufficient for the purpose of this study and patient details were noted down for our personal recordkeeping. This consent procedure was approved by the University of Malaya Medical Centre Ethic Committee.

Genomic DNA extraction and ASP-PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using a commercial blood extraction kit following the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The Duffy blood group genotypes were determined using ASP-PCR based on four sets of primers as previously described [19]. Briefly, samples of genomic DNA were subjected to three different PCR reactions containing a combination of the four primers described. Two of the PCR reactions contained the FY forward primer paired with individual FY*A and FY*B specific reverse primers, whereas, the last reaction used a combination of a forward primer that annealed to the mutated promoter region of the FY*BES and the FY*B specific reverse primer. All three reactions would yield a PCR product of 713 base pairs in length.

Reaction conditions were optimized to ensure specific amplification and these included primer concentration, Mg2+ concentration, genomic DNA template concentration and annealing temperature. Amplification was performed using approximately 0.5 µg of genomic DNA in a final volume of 20 µl which also contained 0.4 µM of forward and reverse primers, 0.2 mM of dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase in appropriate buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). PCR conditions were initiated with an initial denaturation of one cycle at 94°C for 2 minutes followed by 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 1 minute at 60°C for annealing and 1 minute at 72°C performed in a Biorad MyCycler thermal cycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA). All PCR reactions were terminated after a 10 minute extension at 72°C and PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using Fischer's exact test in order to assess the significance of the genotypic and allelic variables in this study and to obtain independence among the proportions of Duffy genotype alleles in P. knowlesi infected patients and blood donors.

Results

Duffy genotyping was successfully performed on 60 blood donor and 51 P. knowlesi infected patient samples by ASP-PCR. The proportion of predicted phenotypes of the Duffy blood group for each blood sample is summarized in Table 1. The data showed high frequency of the Fy(a+b−) phenotype, i.e., in 99 individuals (89.2%) of the total samples. Distribution of the corresponding FY*A/FY*A genotype in the blood donors and infected patients indicated this was the dominating genotype, at 85.0% and 94.1% respectively. No significant difference (P = 0.140) was observed between the donor and malaria infected patients for this genotype. The genotypic frequencies of the Duffy blood group for each blood sample are summarized in Table 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Proportion of predicted phenotypes of blood donors and P. knowlesi infected patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108951.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Comparison of genotypic frequencies between blood donors and P. knowlesi infected patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108951.t002

Frequency of heterozygous genotypes in both groups was low, 7 in the blood donor and 3 in the infected patient groups, this being the FY*A/FY*B genotype. Again, there was no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.338) and with low frequency of the genotype, amounted to 9% of the total predicted phenotype of both groups. The FY*B homozygous genotypes was only observed in the blood donor group with distribution of 3.3%. The genotypes FY*A/FY*BES, FY*B/FY*BES, and FY*BES/FY*BES were absent in the blood donors and infected patients. The phenotype Fy (a−b−) was therefore absent.

As for allelic distribution, which have been summarized in Table 3, the FY*A allele was found to be predominant in both, 90.8% for blood donors and 97.1% for P. knowlesi infected patients. The allelic frequencies of the FY*B allele, on the other hand, were found to be low, 9.2% in blood donors and 2.9% in infected patients The FY*BES allele was not detected in either blood group. The distributions of FY*A and FY*B alleles were not significantly different (P = 0.094) between both groups. This lack of difference between genotypic and allelic distribution between the blood donor group and the P. knowlesi infected patients seems to suggest that neither factor affects malarial infection susceptibility.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Comparison of allelic frequencies between blood donors and P. knowlesi infected patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108951.t003

Discussion

For the most part, natural resistance to P.vivax and P.knowlesi malaria infection in humans has largely been attributed to the Duffy blood group especially so in the case of individuals with the Fy(a− b−) or Duffy silent phenotype. Recently, exceptions to this resistance have been reported for P. vivax infections in South America especially in the Brazilian Amazon as well as Kenya and Madagascar [20], [21], [22], [23]. Duffy blood group polymorphisms are important in areas endemic for P. vivax and P. knowlesi infection as it provides a route for the parasite's entry into the erythrocyte. The data provided in this study emphasizes the importance of Duffy genotype in areas endemic for P. knowlesi infection.

Our results show that the FY*A allele has the highest frequency in both the blood donor and infected patient groups. This is expected as Oriental Asian populations have a propensity to have high frequency of this allele. Indeed, the Fya antigen is common among the Chinese, Japanese and Melanesians but not among Black Africans [24], [25]. The Fyb antigen on the other hand, is found more frequently in Caucasian populations [26], [27]. None of our samples had the FY*BES allele nor the FY*BES/FY*BES genotype and Fy (a−b−) phenotype. This is probably due to the low occurrence of the allele in this region as the FY*BES allele is generally found in those of Black African ancestry. Thus, without any Duffy negative samples we were unable to compare the susceptibility of Duffy positive and Duffy negative individuals to P. knowlesi infection in our study population.

However, it has been reported that other genotypes besides Duffy negative are capable of influencing susceptibility to P. vivax and possibly P. knowlesi infections [20], [28] This was not observed in our study as the genotype frequencies were not significantly different between blood donors and malaria infected patients, especially in the FY*A/FY*A genotype. High frequency of the said genotype however is in accordance with a study on the global Duffy blood group where the distribution of genotypes in the Asian continent was found to be dominantly FY*A/FY*A (96.86%) [29]. Also, the frequencies of the FY*A allele found in our study mirror those reported where the median frequencies were predicted to be above 80% across large extents of south Asia, Australia and in populations of Mongolia and eastern China and Russia. Our study also corroborates a prior study on the Duffy blood group distribution in Malaysia, where 99.68% ‘orang asli’ aborigines possessed the FY*A allele and no Duffy-negative individuals were detected. Our results indicate that the genotype distribution has not changed much in the country since the last study was conducted in 1988 [30].

In summary, the data obtained from this study reveal the genotypic distribution of the Duffy blood group among P. knowlesi infected patients in Peninsular Malaysia. Also, no significant difference was observed between frequencies of the preponderant FY*A/FY*A genotype between the control and malaria infected group. Nonetheless, our results need to be corroborated by further evaluation with a larger sample size as well as incorporating serotyping of the same samples coupled with ASP-PCR which would provide a better analysis of the genotypic distribution in the country as well as susceptibility of P. knowlesi malaria to particular Duffy genotypes.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Diagnostic Laboratory (Para: SEAD), Department of Parasitology, University of Malaya and University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) for providing blood samples.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JRDS LYL MYF. Performed the experiments: JRDS. Analyzed the data: JRDS LYL MYF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LYL MYF. Wrote the paper: JRDS LYL MYF.

References

  1. 1. Miller LH, Mason SJ, Clyde DF, McGinniss MH (1976) The resistance factor to Plasmodium vivax in blacks. The Duffy-blood-group genotype, FyFy. N Engl J Med 295: 302–304.
  2. 2. Horuk R, Chitnis CE, Darbonne WC, Colby TJ, Rybicki A, et al. (1993) A receptor for the malarial parasite Plasmodium vivax: the erythrocyte chemokine receptor. Science 261: 1182–1184.
  3. 3. Szabo MC, Soo KS, Zlotnik A, Schall TJ (1995) Chemokine class differences in binding to the Duffy antigen-erythrocyte chemokine receptor. J Biol Chem 270: 25348–25351.
  4. 4. Geifman-Holtzman O, Wojtowycz M, Kosmas E, Artal R (1997) Female alloimmunization with antibodies known to cause hemolytic disease. Obstet Gynecol 89: 272–275.
  5. 5. Babinszki A, Berkowitz RL (1999) Haemolytic disease of the newborn caused by anti-c, anti-E and anti-Fya antibodies: report of five cases. Prenat Diagn 19: 533–536.
  6. 6. Noizat-Pirenne F (2013) Relevance of blood groups in transfusion of sickle cell disease patients. C R Biol 336: 152–158.
  7. 7. Noizat-Pirenne F (2012) Relevance of alloimmunization in haemolytic transfusion reaction in sickle cell disease. Transfus Clin Biol 19: 132–138.
  8. 8. Ikin EW, Mourant AE, Pettenkofer HJ, Blumenthal G (1951) Discovery of the expected haemagglutinin, anti-Fyb. Nature 168: 1077–1078.
  9. 9. Chaudhuri A, Polyakova J, Zbrzezna V, Pogo AO (1995) The coding sequence of Duffy blood group gene in humans and simians: restriction fragment length polymorphism, antibody and malarial parasite specificities, and expression in nonerythroid tissues in Duffy-negative individuals. Blood 85: 615–621.
  10. 10. Mathew S, Chaudhuri A, Murty VV, Pogo AO (1994) Confirmation of Duffy blood group antigen locus (FY) at 1q22–>q23 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 67: 68.
  11. 11. Iwamoto S, Omi T, Kajii E, Ikemoto S (1995) Genomic organization of the glycoprotein D gene: Duffy blood group Fya/Fyb alloantigen system is associated with a polymorphism at the 44-amino acid residue. Blood 85: 622–626.
  12. 12. Yazdanbakhsh KRM, Storry JR, Kosower N, Parasol N, Chaudhuri A, et al. (2000) Molecular mechanisms that lead to reduced expression of Duffy antigens. Transfusion 40: 310–320.
  13. 13. Olsson ML, Hansson C, Avent ND, Akesson IE, Green CA, et al. (1998) A clinically applicable method for determining the three major alleles at the Duffy (FY) blood group locus using polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific primers. Transfusion 38: 168–173.
  14. 14. Fong YL, Cadigan FC, Coatney GR (1971) A presumptive case of naturally occurring Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in man in Malaysia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 65: 839–840.
  15. 15. Singh B, Kim Sung L, Matusop A, Radhakrishnan A, Shamsul SS, et al. (2004) A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet 363: 1017–1024.
  16. 16. Vythilingam I, Noorazian YM, Huat TC, Jiram AI, Yusri YM, et al. (2008) Plasmodium knowlesi in humans, macaques and mosquitoes in peninsular Malaysia. Parasit Vectors 1: 26.
  17. 17. Lau YL, Tan LH, Chin LC, Fong MY, Noraishah MA, et al. (2011) Plasmodium knowlesi reinfection in human. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 1314–1315.
  18. 18. Lee WC, Chin PW, Lau YL, Chin LC, Fong MY, et al. (2013) Hyperparasitaemic human Plasmodium knowlesi infection with atypical morphology in peninsular Malaysia. Malar J 12: 88.
  19. 19. Cotorruelo C, Biondi C, Racca L, Borras SG, Racca A (2009) Duffy genotyping facilitates transfusion therapy. Clin Exp Med 9: 249–251.
  20. 20. Cavasini CE, de Mattos LC, Couto AA, Couto VS, Gollino Y, et al. (2007) Duffy blood group gene polymorphisms among malaria vivax patients in four areas of the Brazilian Amazon region. Malar J 6: 167.
  21. 21. Cavasini CE, Mattos LC, Couto AA, Bonini-Domingos CR, Valencia SH, et al. (2007) Plasmodium vivax infection among Duffy antigen-negative individuals from the Brazilian Amazon region: an exception? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 101: 1042–1044.
  22. 22. Menard D, Barnadas C, Bouchier C, Henry-Halldin C, Gray LR, et al. (2010) Plasmodium vivax clinical malaria is commonly observed in Duffy-negative Malagasy people. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 5967–5971.
  23. 23. Ryan JR, Stoute JA, Amon J, Dunton RF, Mtalib R, et al. (2006) Evidence for transmission of Plasmodium vivax among a duffy antigen negative population in Western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 575–581.
  24. 24. Shimizu YAH, Soemantri A, Tiwawech D, Settheetham-Ishida W, Kayame OW, et al. (2000) Sero- and molecular typing of Duffy blood group in Southeast Asians and Oceanians. Human Biology 72: 511–518.
  25. 25. Shimizu YKM, Settheetham-Ishida W, Duangchang P, Ishida T (1997) Serotyping of Duffy blood group in several Thai ethnic groups Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 28: 32–35.
  26. 26. Moulds JM, Hayes S, Wells TD (1998) DNA analysis of Duffy genes in American blacks. Vox Sang 74: 248–252.
  27. 27. Miller LH, Mason SJ, Dvorak JA, McGinniss MH, Rothman IK (1975) Erythrocyte receptors for (Plasmodium knowlesi) malaria: Duffy blood group determinants. Science 189: 561–563.
  28. 28. King CL, Adams JH, Xianli J, Grimberg BT, McHenry AM, et al. (2011) Fy(a)/Fy(b) antigen polymorphism in human erythrocyte Duffy antigen affects susceptibility to Plasmodium vivax malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 20113–20118.
  29. 29. Howes RE, Patil AP, Piel FB, Nyangiri OA, Kabaria CW, et al. (2011) The global distribution of the Duffy blood group. Nat Commun 2: 266.
  30. 30. Lewis GE Jr, Miller LH, Ibrahim L, Wong PW, McGinniss M, et al. (1988) Duffy phenotypes in Malaysian populations: correction of previous unusual findings. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 82: 509–510.