Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Attenuation of Acetylcholine Activated Potassium Current (IKACh) by Simvastatin, Not Pravastatin in Mouse Atrial Cardiomyocyte: Possible Atrial Fibrillation Preventing Effects of Statin

  • Kyoung-Im Cho,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Tae-Joon Cha ,

    chatjn@gmail.com

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Su-Jin Lee,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • In-Kyeung Shim,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Yin Hua Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Jung-Ho Heo,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Hyun-Su Kim,

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Sung Joon Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Kyoung-Lyoung Kim,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Biology, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Jae-Woo Lee

    Affiliation Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

    ⨯

Abstract

Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, are associated with the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) by pleiotropic effects. Recent clinical trial studies have demonstrated conflicting results on anti-arrhythmia between lipophilic and hydrophilic statins. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for anti-arrhythmogenic effects of statins are largely unexplored. In this study, we evaluated the different roles of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins (simvastatin and pravastatin, respectively) in acetylcholine (100 µM)-activated K+ current (IKACh, recorded by nystatin-perforated whole cell patch clamp technique) which are important for AF initiation and maintenance in mouse atrial cardiomyocytes. Our results showed that simvastatin (1–10 µM) inhibited both peak and quasi-steady-state IKACh in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, pravastatin (10 µM) had no effect on IKACh. Supplementation of substrates for the synthesis of cholesterol (mevalonate, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate or farnesyl pyrophosphate) did not reverse the effect of simvastatin on IKACh, suggesting a cholesterol-independent effect on IKACh. Furthermore, supplementation of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, extracellular perfusion of phospholipase C inhibitor or a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor had no effect on the inhibitory activity of simvastatin on IKACh. Simvastatin also inhibits adenosine activated IKACh, however, simvastatin does not inhibit IKACh after activated by intracellular loading of GTP gamma S. Importantly, shortening of the action potential duration by acetylcholine was restored by simvastatin but not by pravastatin. Together, these findings demonstrate that lipophilic statins but not hydrophilic statins attenuate IKACh in atrial cardiomyocytes via a mechanism that is independent of cholesterol synthesis or PKC pathway, but may be via the blockade of acetylcholine binding site. Our results may provide important background information for the use of statins in patients with AF.

Citation: Cho K-I, Cha T-J, Lee S-J, Shim I-K, Zhang YH, Heo J-H, et al. (2014) Attenuation of Acetylcholine Activated Potassium Current (IKACh) by Simvastatin, Not Pravastatin in Mouse Atrial Cardiomyocyte: Possible Atrial Fibrillation Preventing Effects of Statin. PLoS ONE 9(10): e106570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570

Editor: Thomas Hund, The Ohio State University, United States of America

Received: March 23, 2014; Accepted: July 30, 2014; Published: October 16, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Cho et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Korea Heart Rhythm Society (KHRS 2011-1) and Kosin University College of Medicine (2011). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of chronic cardiac arrhythmia [1], [2], and the pathophysiology of AF is complex [3]–[5]. Statins have pleiotropic effects which are independent of their cholesterol-lowering effects [5], [6]. Furthermore, it has been shown that statins can modulate the activities of L-type calcium channels and transient outward potassium channels, which are altered by rapid atrial pacing [7]. These properties can partially explain ionic mechanisms of the anti-arrhythmic effect of statins.

However, clinical trials have shown conflicting results regarding the anti-arrhythmic effects of statins [6], [8]–[11]. In particular, the GISSI Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) trial showed that the hydrophilic statin, rosuvastatin, did not affect clinical outcome and exerted little benefit with regard to AF occurrence [10], [11]. In contrast, simvastatin, a lipophilic statin, has been shown to prevent the occurrence of AF in a rapid atrial pacing animal model [12]. According to the Sarr et al. [13], hydrophilic pravastatin exhibited the lowest association with the lipid monolayer, and lipophilic simvastatin showed a strong membrane elution ability, which can be explained by hydrophobicity of statin molecule [14]. These findings suggest that lipophilic and hydrophilic statins may differ with respect to effects on the myocardium as a result of different ion channel binding affinity. For example, simvastatin may reduce susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation mainly by reducing sympathetic hyperinnervation and electrical remodeling induced by hypercholesterolemia [15]. So, we can hypothesize that simvastatin may modulate membrane ion channel more effectively than hydrophilic pravastatin.

Although simultaneous sympathetic and parasympathetic (sympathovagal) activation may facilitate the onset of paroxysmal AF [16], effects of statins on the neurohormonal imbalances are not known yet [17]. A plausible link between sympathovagal and neurohormonal interactions in cardiac myocytes is the acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IKACh). IKACh is involved in tachycardia-induced electrical remodeling and participates in AF initiation and maintenance. In atrial cardiomyocytes, IKACh is constitutively active, and atrial tachycardia may further increase its activity. Considering the evidence that statins may suppress AF, we hypothesized that statins influence IKACh in atrial myocytes, and that the effects may vary with the lipophilicity of the statin. To test this hypothesis, we compared the effects of the lipophilic simvastatin with effects of the hydrophilic pravastatin on IKACh and acetylcholine-induced action potential duration (APD) in atrial cardiomyocytes.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design

Imprinting Control Region mice weighing 20∼30 g were used for animal experiments. The protocols for animal care and use were in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Research Committee at Kosin University Gospel Hospital. To isolate mouse atrial myocytes, the hearts were rapidly excised and mounted onto a Langendorff apparatus at 37°C and perfused with a Ca2+-free normal Tyrode solution containing collagenase (0.14 mg/ml). The IKACh current was recorded using a nystatin-perforated whole cell patch-clamp technique following activation by acetylcholine (100 µM for 2 min). After measurement of the baseline IKACh current, atrial myocytes were perfused with lipophilic statins (simvastatin 10 µM for 10 min), after which the IKACh current was re-measured. The IKACh currents were compared with those measured in the presence of a hydrophilic statin (pravastatin 10 µM for 10 min). We also evaluated the underlying mechanism of simvastatin-induced IKACh inhibition.

Isolation of single cardiomyocytes

Ten mice in each group were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Hearts were removed by thoracotomy and quickly mounted onto a modified Langendorff perfusion system. To ensure coronary circulation, hearts were sequentially perfused with four solutions (all at 37°C) as follows: (1) normal Tyrode's solution containing (in mM): NaCl 143, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 0.5, NaH2PO4 0.33, HEPES 5 and glucose 10, adjusted with NaOH to pH 7.4, for 4–5 min; (2) Ca2+-free normal Tyrode's solution for 5 min; (3) Ca2+-free normal Tyrode's solution supplemented with collagenase (type II, 15 mg/35 ml, Worthington, USA) for 15–20 min; and (4) a high K+, low-Cl− solution (modified Kraft-Brühe [KB] solution) containing (in mM): KOH 70, L-glutamic acid 50, KCl 55, taurine 20, KH2PO4 20, MgCl2 3, EGTA 0.5, HEPES 10 and glucose 20, adjusted to pH 7.2 with KOH, for 5 min. The atrium was then dissected from the heart and placed in a dish. Individual cardiomyocytes were released by mechanical agitation and stored at 4°C in KB solution.

Electrophysiological measurements

Acetylcholine-activated K+ currents (IKACh) in the whole-cell configuration were recorded using the perforated patch clamp technique [18]. Single atrial cells were placed in a recording chamber attached to an inverted microscope (IMT-2; Olympus, Tokyo) and superfused with normal Tyrode's solution at a rate of 3 ml/min. All experiments were performed at room temperature. Patch pipettes were made from glass capillaries with a diameter of 1.5 mm using a microelectrode puller (Sutter Instruments, P-97) and were filled with solution to a resistance of 2–3 MΩ. The IKACh was recorded from single isolated myocytes in a perforated patch configuration using nystatin (200 µg/ml; ICN) at room temperature. The composition of the pipette solutions for perforated patches contained (in mM): KCl 140, MgCl2 1, NaH2PO4 0.5, HEPES 10 and EGTA 5, adjusted to pH 7.2 with KOH. IKACh was activated by extracellular application of acetylcholine (Ach, 100 µM for 2 min), and peak IKACh was measured as the difference between the peak and the steady-state current at the end of the pulse. After the baseline IKACh current was measured, varying concentrations of simvastatin or pravastatin were applied for 10 minutes, and a second IKACh current was recorded. The peak and quasi-steady-state IKACh recordings (taken before and after 10 minutes of statin treatment, respectively) were then compared. Current signals were recorded using Clampfit 6.0 software (Axon Instruments, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA).

Materials

Simvastatin, pravastatin, mevalonic acid lactone, and all other chemicals were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Simvastatin was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Amresco), and pravastatin was dissolved in distilled water. Simvastatin was prepared fresh for each experiment from a stock solution (10 mM in DMSO, stored at −20°C) and diluted a final concentration of 10 µM, and added in the bath solution. For each experiment, small aliquots of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor stock solutions were added to normal Tyrode's solution. The final concentration of DMSO was 0.1% and had no effecton IKACh in atrial cardiomyocytes [20].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, ver. 15.0, (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Numeric data were expressed as the mean ± SD, and electrophysiological data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical differences among the nominal variables of the groups were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test, and the differences between the subgroups were assessed with the post-hoc Tukey test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the tests.

Results

Effect of simvastatin on IKACh in mouse atrial cells

Application of acetylcholine (100 µM) to the bath solution promptly activated IKACh in mouse atrial myocytes (Fig. 1A). Re-application of acetylcholine after washout for >10 min induced IKACh to a similar amplitude (Fig. 1A), indicating reproducibility of IKACh during the investigation period. We next examined the effects of simvastatin on IKACh. After baseline IKACh measurement (I1), simvastatin (10 µM) was applied for 10 minutes, and IKACh in the presence of simvastatin (I2) was compared to baseline IKACh (I1). As shown in Fig. 1B, treatment with simvastatin for 10 min significantly reduced peak IKACh current. After 10 minutes washout of simvastatin, IKAch was partially recovered 76.4±11.3% of baseline current (Fig. 1D). On average, peak I2 (I2, peak) was 35.5±13.6% of I1 (I1, peak), while the quasi-steady-state amplitude of I2 (I2, qss) was 19.9±11.8% of I1 (I1, qss) (p<0.001 for the I2 peak and p<0.001 for the I2 qss (each n = 10, Figs. 1E–F). Current–voltage (I–V) curves were obtained from the current response induced by voltage ramps between −120 and +60 mV from the holding potential of −40 mV. Corresponding I–V curves were plotted in Fig. 1 G, H and I–V relationships demonstrated that simvastatin inhibited the net IKACh over the whole tested voltage range. In addition, simvastatin inhibited IKACh in a dose-dependent manner between 1 and 10 µM (1 µM, n = 6; 91.5±9.0%, 3 µM, n = 6; 80.8±9.9%, 5 µM, n = 6; 68.7±15.7%, 10 µM, n = 10; 35.5±13.6%, p<0.001, Fig. 2), which was also shown in I-V relationships (Fig. 1H). When we tested the effect of simvastatin on the IKAch without acetylcholine administration, simvastatin had no influence on the IKAch over the whole tested voltage range (n = 3, Fig. S1A). When we test a time dependent effect for achieving steady-state block of IKACh, there were no significant differences in achieving steady-state block of IKAch among 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min after simvastatin application (each n = 5, p = NS, Fig. S2). The percent inhibition in the presence of simvastatin was calculated with respect to the amplitude of peak (Ipeak) and quasi-steady-state (Iqss) in the presence of simvastatin and plotted in Fig. 2F and 2H. The data were fitted with the Hill equation, showing that the concentration for half-maximal inhibition (IC50) was 5.80 µM for the Ipeak and 5.27 µM for the Iqss (n = 3 in every points, total n = 21). Importantly, acetylcholine significantly shorted APD at 90% repolarization (APD90, from 27.3±2.2 ms to 7.2±1.6 ms, p<0.01), while treatment with simvastatin recovered levels to those of vehicle treatment (vehicle, n = 7; 27.3±2.2 ms, simvastatin, n = 7; 19.3±3.3 ms, p = 0.34, Figs. 3A, C). When we tested the effect of simvastatin on the APD90 without acetylcholine, simvastatin had no influence on the APD90 (n = 3, Fig. S1B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Acetylcholine-activated K+ currents (IKACh) were recorded using a nystatin-perforated whole cell patch clamp technique.

A. Acetylcholine (100 µM) was applied to the bath solution, and IKACh was promptly activated. B. Simvastatin (10 µM) treatment for 10 minutes significantly reduced the peak and quasi-steady-state IKACh amplitudes. C. Pravastatin (10 µM) treatment for 10 minutes did not change peak or quasi-steady-state IKACh amplitude. D. After 10 minutes washout of simvastatin, IKAch was partially recovered. E. Peak amplitude at baseline IKACh (I1, peak) and the second IKACh peak (I2, peak), after statin application. F. Quasi-steady state amplitude of baseline IKACh (I1, qss) and second qss IKACh (I2, qss) after statin application. G. Current–voltage (I–V) curves were plotted. The ramps were applied before (d) and after acetylcholine 100 µM application (a), in the presence of pravastatin 10 µM (b) and simvastatin 10 µM (c). H. The ramps were applied before (e) and after acetylcholine 100 µM application (a), in the presence of simvastatin 3 µM (b), 5 µM (c) and 10 µM (d). NS; no significant change, *; p<0.05 compared to controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Simvastatin inhibits acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IKACh) in a dose-dependent manner at A. 1 µM, B. 3 µM, C. 5 µM and D. 10 µM.

E. Peak amplitude of baseline IKACh (I1, peak) and second IKACh peak (I2, peak) after application of simvastatin. F. Dose response curve for the percent inhibition of peak IKACh amplitude in the presence of simvastatin. G. Quasi-steady state amplitudes of baseline IKACh (I1, qss) and the second IKACh (I2, qss) after simvastatin. H. Dose response curve for the percent inhibition of quasi-steady state IKACh amplitude in the presence of simvastatin. NS; no significant change, *; p<0.05 compared to controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Change of action potential duration (APD) after acetylcholine application with or without statins.

A. Acetylcholine significantly shortened APD at 90% repolarization, while simvastatin restored APD to vehicle level (NT, normal tyrode). B. Pravastatin did not restore the shortened APD induced by acetylcholine. C. Comparison of APD at 90% repolarization after acetylcholine application with simvastatin or pravastatin. NS; no significant change, *; p<0.05 compared to controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.g003

Effect of pravastatin on IKACh in mouse atrial cells

We next investigated the effects of pravastatin on IKACh using the same experimental protocol. Addition of pravastatin in a bath solution for 10 minutes did not significantly alter peak amplitude or quasi-steady-state of the currents compared to controls (n = 10, p = 0.48 for peak IKAch and n = 10, p = 0.19 for qss IKAch, Figs. 1C, E, F) and did not restore the acetylcholine-induced shortening of APD (acetylcholine, n = 6; 8.5±3.7 ms, pravastatin, n = 6; 9.1±4.3 ms, p = 0.85, Figs. 3B, C).

Mechanism of simvastatin-induced IKACh inhibition in mouse atrial cells

To investigate the association between simvastatin-induced IKACh inhibition and inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, substrates for cholesterol synthesis consisting of mevalonate (MVA, Fig. 4A), geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP, Fig. 4B), or farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, Fig. 4C) were added with simvastatin in the bath solution. However, the reductions in peak amplitude and quasi-steady-state current of IKACh by simvastatin were not prevented by supplementation with any of these substrates (p = 0.28, p = 0.37 and p = 0.41 for MVA, GGPP and FPP, respectively, each n = 7, Figs. 4D,E). Moreover, to investigate if the modulation of simvastatin-induced IKACh inhibition may happen through the phospholipase C (PLC), protein kinase C (PKC) pathway or depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) [19], [20], PLC inhibitor, PKC inhibitor, and PIP2 were tested. Loading the patch pipette with PIP2 via whole cell ruptured patch clamp did not alter simvastatin-mediated inhibition of IKACh (Fig. 5A), implying that simvastatin did not limit the availability of these agents. Similarly, application of the PLC inhibitor neomycin (50 µM, Fig. 5B) or the PKC inhibitor calphostin C extracellular solution (1 µM, Fig. 5C) failed to alter simvastatin-inhibition of IKACh (each n = 7, Figs. 5D,E). When we activate IKACh by intracellular loading of GTP gamma S (100 µM/L) via whole cell patch, simvastatin did not inhibit IKACh (n = 5, Figs. 5F,H). However, when we activate IKACh by extracellular application of adenosine, simvastatin also inhibit adenosine activated IKACh (n = 5, Figs. 5G,H), which suggest that simvastatin influence on the adenosine binding site as well as acetylcholine binding sites. This result suggests that acute administration of simvastatin may inhibit the IKACh by blockade of acetylcholine binding site.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IKACh) after simvastatin in the presence of substrates and intermediary metabolites in cholesterol synthesis; A. mevalonate (MVA), B. geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), and C. farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP).

D. Peak amplitudes at baseline IKACh (I1, peak) and the second IKACh peak (I2, peak) after simvastatin with various cholesterol biosynthetic intermediates. E. Quasi-steady state amplitude of baseline IKACh (I1, qss) and second IKACh (I2, qss) after simvastatin with various cholesterol biosynthetic intermediates. NS; no significant change, *; p<0.05 compared to controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.g004

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. Acetylcholine-activated K+ current (IKACh) after simvastatin with A. phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), B. phospholipase C inhibitor (PLC inhibitor, neomycin 50 µM), and C. protein kinase C inhibitor (PKC inhibitor, calphostin C 1 µM).

D. Peak amplitudes of baseline IKACh (I1, peak) and the second IKACh (I2, peak) after treatment with PIP2, PLC inhibitor, and PKC inhibitor. E. Quasi-steady state amplitudes of baseline IKACh (qss I1) and second IKACh (qss I2) after treatment with PIP2, PLC inhibitor, and PKC inhibitor. F. Simvastatin did not inhibit the activated IKACh by intracellular loading of GTP gamma S (100 µM/L). G. Simvastatin inhibit activated IKACh by adenosine. H. Peak amplitudes of baseline IKACh (qss I1) and second IKACh (qss I2) activated by GTP gamma S and adenosine after treatment with simvastatin. NS; no significant change, *; p<0.05 compared to controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.g005

Discussion

The results of this study indicated that lipophilic simvastatin but not hydrophilic pravastatin suppressed IKACh in mouse atrial myocytes. These effects were not dependent on cholesterol biosynthesis or PIP2 pathway, suggesting the involvement of direct inhibition of IKACh. In addition, simvastatin significantly attenuated acetylcholine-induced APD shortening. Importantly, these results provided the first direct evidence that the lipophilic HMG CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin facilitates its potent anti-arrhythmic effect by inhibiting IKAch and suppressing electrical remodeling in mammalian atrial myocytes.

Effects of statins on IKACh in mouse atrial cells

Statins exert pleiotropic effects in part by reducing the availability of intermediary metabolites in cholesterol synthesis (isoprenoids), which in turn mediate regulatory signaling through activation of guanosine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins). Through G-protein inhibition, treatment with statins may induce rapid and significant improvement in endothelial function [21], in part by reversing the suppression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase [23] associated with hypercholesterolemia [21], [22].

The effectiveness of statins in both primary and secondary prevention of AF implies that multiple mechanisms may be involved in their anti-arrhythmic activity. The capacity of statins to reduce inflammation, thereby reducing the risk of AF [24], may reflect the pleiotropic properties of these drugs, in part because they are independent of the lipid-lowering effects. Although a direct causative relationship between inflammation and AF has not been established [25], inflammation may induce autonomic remodeling, providing a substrate for initiation and maintenance of AF [26]. In addition to indirect anti-arrhythmic effects, statins may also act directly by modulating fatty acid composition and physiochemical properties of cell membranes, resulting in alterations of the properties of transmembrane ion channels [7], [27]. The established role of atrial tachycardia–induced electrical remodeling in AF [28], [29] implies that changes in ion channel function (“ionic remodeling”) are involved in this pathophysiological process [28]–[30], and thus statins may in turn influence ion channel activities. Seto et al. [31] reported that simvastatin inhibits Ca2+-activated K+ channels in arterial smooth muscle cells, while Bergdahl et al. [32] showed that lovastatin inhibits L-type Ca2+ currents in rat basilar artery smooth muscle cells. Atorvastatin and simvastatin produce a concentration-dependent blockade of hKv1.5 channels in vitro [33]. In addition, simvastatin attenuates cerebrovascular remodeling in the hypertensive rat through inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by suppression of volume-regulated chloride channels [13].

Upregulation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels is an important contribution to the electrical remodeling underlying AF. Accordingly, inhibition of these currents may be a potential anti-arrhythmic target devoid of ventricular side effects [34]. We previously demonstrated that the constitutively active IKACh substantially contributes to the repolarization phase of atrial action potential in AF. Further, as a potential ionic determinant of AF, IKACh represents a plausible target for therapy [35]–[37]. The results of the present study confirmed our hypothesis that treatment with the lipophilic statin simvastatin but not with hydrophilic pravastatin attenuates IKACh as a component of the anti-arrhythmic effect of statins.

Contrasting effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on IKACh in mouse atrial cells

Clinical trials of statins in the prevention of AF recurrence have reported mixed results. Although atorvastatin and simvastatin reduced AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion (EC) [6], use of pravastatin before EC did not decrease AF recurrence [9] and rosuvastatin did not affect clinical outcome and AF occurrence [10], [11]. Lipophilic statins improve cardiac sympathetic activity by reducing oxidative stress [38], [39], and an active metabolite of atorvastatin displays stronger antioxidant activity than rosuvastatin [40]. Simvastatin but not pravastatin significantly reduces angiotensin II-induced calcium mobilization [41], and simvastatin may exert direct anti-arrhythmic effect by suppressing events that trigger AF [42]. Accordingly, our results indicate that the inhibition of IKACh may represent another important anti-arrhythmic mechanism of simvastatin. This inhibitory action on the IKACh current was not reversed by addition of mevalonate (MVA), GGPP, or FPP, implying that simvastatin may suppress IKACh independently from signaling proteins activated by isoprenylation. Moreover, PLC/PKC inhibition and PIP2 supplementation did not change simvastatin induced IKACh inhibition, implicating that statin-induced IKACh inhibition is independent of PKC pathway. Interestingly, simvastatin also inhibit adenosine activated IKACh, which suggest that simvastatin influence on the adenosine binding site as well as acetylcholine binding sites. However, intracellular application of gamma GTP 100 µM/L induced IKACh activation was not suppressed by simvastatin, which possibly suggest that simvastatin induced IKACh inhibition may be done by interference of acetylcholine ligand binding pocket. We observed the inhibition of IKACh as soon as 10±20 sec after administration of simvastatin, which suggested that inhibition of IKACh does not involve metabolism of the drug but occurs through direct interaction of the drug with K+ channels within the membrane. The highly lipophilic simvastatin has a strong affinity for the cell membrane [13] and, consequently, it may has easy access to the intracellular space; this may explain the ability of simvastatin to effectively inhibit IKACh in atrial myocytes. In contrast, hydrophilic pravastatin has limited access to the plasma membrane and intracellular space [13], which may explain the absence of immediate effect on IKACh. In accordance with our results, Matsuda et al. [43] showed that the inhibitory effect of simvastatin on catecholamine secretion induced by acetylcholine does not involve its inhibition of mevalonate-derived isoprenoid synthesis, and that pravastatin does not inhibit acetylcholine-induced catecholamine secretion in cultured adrenal medullary cells. Pravastatin significantly increases parasympathetic modulation of heart rate by stimulation of Gα (i2) expression [44] and protects against ventricular arrhythmias [45], while parasympathetic stimulation is known to promote AF through shortening of atrial refractory periods.

It should be noted that we studied acute exposure rather than chronic treatment, which should be taken into consideration in addition to the extreme caution that must be taken when extrapolating results from mouse atrial cardiomyocytes to human disease. Moreover, we did not manipulate membrane cholesterol and did not study the gating kinetics, and these will be interesting future research themes. In conclusion, we found that the lipophilic statin simvastatin suppressed acetylcholine-activated IKACh, while the hydrophilic statin pravastatin did not. These results provide important background information for using lipophilic statins in the clinical treatment of AF.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

A. Simvastatin had no influence on the IKAch over the whole tested voltage range without acetylcholine. B. Simvastatin had no influence on the APD90 without acetylcholine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

To investigate a time dependent effect, steady-state block of IKAch were achieved at the 5 minute, 10 minute, and 15 minutes after simvastatin application. There were no significant differences in achieving “steady-state” block of IKAch among 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min (each n = 5, total n = 15, p = NS). NS = no significant change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106570.s002

(TIF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TJC KIC. Performed the experiments: SJL IKS. Analyzed the data: YHZ JHH HSK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SJK KLK JWL. Wrote the paper: TJC KIC.

References

  1. 1. Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL (2009) Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the united states. Am J Cardiol 104: 1534–1539.
  2. 2. Tsadok MA, Jackevicius CA, Essebag V, Eisenberg MJ, Rahme E, et al. (2012) Rhythm versus rate control therapy and subsequent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 126: 2680–2687.
  3. 3. Korantzopoulos P, Kolettis T, Siogas K, Goudevenos J (2003) Atrial fibrillation and electrical remodeling: The potential role of inflammation and oxidative stress. Med Sci Monit 9: RA225–229.
  4. 4. Cai H, Li Z, Goette A, Mera F, Honeycutt C, et al. (2002) Downregulation of endocardial nitric oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production in atrial fibrillation: potential mechanisms for atrial thrombosis and stroke. Circulation 106: 2854–2858.
  5. 5. Riesen WF, Engler H, Risch M, Korte W, Noseda G (2002) Short-term effects of atorvastatin on C-reactive protein. Eur Heart J 23: 794–799.
  6. 6. Siu CW, Lau CP, Tse HF (2003) Prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence by statin therapy in patients with lone atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 92: 1343–1345.
  7. 7. Laszlo R, Menzel KA, Bentz K, Schreiner B, Kettering K, et al. (2010) Atorvastatin treatment affects atrial ion currents and their tachycardia-induced remodeling in rabbits. Life Sci 87: 507–513.
  8. 8. Ozaydin M, Varol E, Aslan SM, Kucuktepe Z, Dogan A, et al. (2006) Effect of atorvastatin on the recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 97: 1490–1493.
  9. 9. Tveit A, Grundtvig M, Gundersen T, Vanberg P, Semb AG, et al. (2004) Analysis of pravastatin to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 93: 780–782.
  10. 10. Maggioni AP, Fabbri G, Lucci D, Marchioli R, Franzosi MG, et al. (2009) Effects of rosuvastatin on atrial fibrillation occurrence: ancillary results of the GISSI-HF trial. Eur Heart J 30: 2327–2336.
  11. 11. GISSI-HF investigators (2008) Tavazzi L, Maggioni AP, Marchioli R, Barlera S, et al. (2008) Effect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 372: 1231–1239.
  12. 12. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Brundel BJ, Burstein B, Leung TK, Mitamura H, et al. (2007) Effects of simvastatin on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 74: 75–84.
  13. 13. Sarr FS, André C, Guillaume YC (2008) Statins (HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors)-biomimetic membrane binding mechanism investigated by molecular chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 868: 20–27.
  14. 14. Davidson MH, Toth PP (2004) Comparative effects of lipid-lowering therapies. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 47: 73–104.
  15. 15. Liu YB, Lee YT, Pak HN, Lin SF, Fishbein MC, et al. (2009) Effects of simvastatin on cardiac neural and electrophysiologic remodeling in rabbits with hypercholesterolemia. Heart Rhythm 6: 69–75.
  16. 16. Sharifov OF, Fedorov VV, Beloshapko GG, Glukhov AV, Yushmanova AV, et al. (2004) Roles of adrenergic and cholinergic stimulation in spontaneous atrial fibrillation in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 483–490.
  17. 17. Chen PS, Tan AY (2007) Autonomic nerve activity and atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 4: S61–S64.
  18. 18. Hamil OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391: 85–100.
  19. 19. Cho H, Nam GB, Lee SH, Earm YE, Ho WK (2001) Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate is acting as a signal molecule in alpha(1)-adrenergic pathway via the modulation of acetylcholine-activated K(+) channels in mouse atrial myocytes. J Biol Chem 276: 159–164.
  20. 20. Cho H, Youm JB, Ryu SY, Earm YE, Ho WK (2001) Inhibition of acetylcholine-activated K+ currents by U73122 is mediated by the inhibition of PIP(2)-channel interaction. Br J Pharmacol 134: 1066–1072.
  21. 21. Maron DJ, Fazio S, Linton MF (2000) Current perspectives on statins. Circulation 101: 207–213.
  22. 22. Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook TL, Wayne RR, Mudge GH, et al. (1986) Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 315: 1046–1051.
  23. 23. Laufs U, Liao JK (1998) Post-transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mrna stability by rho gtpase. J Biol Chem 273: 24266–24271.
  24. 24. Ganotakis ES, Mikhailidis DP, Vardas PE (2006) Atrial fibrillation, inflammation and statins. Hellenic J Cardiol 47: 51–53.
  25. 25. Patel P, Dokainish H, Tsai P, Lakkis N (2010) Update on the association of inflammation and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21: 1064–1070.
  26. 26. Zhu W, Saba S, Link MS, Bak E, Homoud MK, et al. (2005) Atrioventricular nodal reverse facilitation in connexion 40-deficient mice. Heart Rhythm 2: 1231–1237.
  27. 27. Pound EM, Kang JX, Leaf A (2001) Partitioning of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which prevent cardiac arrhythmias, into phospholipid cell membranes. J Lipid Res 42: 346–351.
  28. 28. Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U (2002) Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 54: 230–246.
  29. 29. Nattel S (2002) New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature 415: 219–226.
  30. 30. Dobrev D, Ravens U (2003) Remodeling of cardiomyocyte ion channels in human atrial fibrillation. Basic Res Cardiol 98: 137–148.
  31. 31. Seto SW, Au AL, Lam TY, Chim SS, Lee SM, et al. (2007) Modulation by simvastatin of iberiotoxin-sensitive, Ca2+-activated K+ channels of porcine coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol 151: 987–997.
  32. 32. Bergdahl A, Persson E, Hellstrand P, Swärd K (2003) Lovastatin induces relaxation and inhibits L-type Ca2+ current in the rat basilar artery. Pharmacol Toxicol 93: 128–134.
  33. 33. Vaquero M, Caballero R, Gómez R, Núñez L, Tamargo J, et al. (2007) Effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on atrial plateau currents. J Mol Cell Cardiol 42: 931–945.
  34. 34. Ehrlich JR (2008) Inward rectifier potassium currents as a target for atrial fibrillation therapy. Cardiovasc Pharmacol 52: 129–135.
  35. 35. Ehrlich JR, Cha TJ, Zhang L, Chartier D, Villeneuve L, et al. (2004) Characterization of a hyperpolarization-activated time-dependent potassium current in canine cardiomyocytes from pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves and left atrium. J Physiol 557: 583–597.
  36. 36. Cha TJ, Ehrlich JR, Zhang L, Chartier D, Leung TK, et al. (2005) Atrial tachycardia remodeling of pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes: comparison with left atrium and potential relation to arrhythmogenesis. Circulation 111: 728–735.
  37. 37. Cha TJ, Ehrlich JR, Chartier D, Qi XY, Xiao L, et al. (2005) Kir3-based inward rectifier potassium current: potential role in atrial tachycardia remodeling effects on atrial repolarization and arrhythmias. Circulation 111: 728–735.
  38. 38. Gomes ME, Tack CJ, Verheugt FW, Smits P, Lenders JW (2010) Sympathoinhibition by atorvastatin in hypertensive patients. Circ J 74: 2622–2626.
  39. 39. Tsutamoto T, Sakai H, Ibe K, Yamaji M, Kawahara C, et al. (2011) Effect of Atorvastatin vs. Rosuvastatin on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Non-Diabetic Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circ J 75: 2160–2166.
  40. 40. Mason RP, Walter MF, Day CA, Jacob RF (2006) Active metabolite of atorvastatin inhibits membrane cholesterol domain formation by an antioxidant mechanism. J Biol Chem 281: 9337–9345.
  41. 41. Escobales N, Crespo MJ, Altieri PI, Furilla RA (1996) Inhibition of smooth muscle cell calcium mobilization and aortic ring contraction by lactone vastatins. J Hypertens 14: 115–121.
  42. 42. Sicouri S, Gianetti B, Zygmunt AC, Cordeiro JM, Antzelevitch C (2011) Antiarrhythmic effects of simvastatin in canine pulmonary vein sleeve preparations. J Am Coll Cardiol 57: 986–993.
  43. 43. Matsuda T, Toyohira Y, Ueno S, Tsutsui M, Yanagihara N (2008) Simvastatin inhibits catecholamine secretion and synthesis induced by acetylcholine via blocking Na+ and Ca2+ influx in bovine adrenal medullary cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 327: 130–136.
  44. 44. Welzig CM, Shin DG, Park HJ, Kim YJ, Saul JP, et al. (2003) Lipid lowering by pravastatin increases parasympathetic modulation of heart rate: Galpha(i2), a possible molecular marker for parasympathetic responsiveness. Circulation 108: 2743–2746.
  45. 45. Welzig CM, Park HJ, Naggar J, Confalone D, Rhofiry J, et al. (2010) Differential effects of statins (pravastatin or simvastatin) on ventricular ectopic complexes: Galpha(i2), a possible molecular marker for ventricular irritability. Am J Cardiol 105: 1112–1117.