Figures
Abstract
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (GRM1) signaling has been implicated in benign and malignant disorders including prostate cancer (PCa). To further explore the role of genetic alterations of GRM1 in PCa, we screened the entire human GRM1 gene including coding sequence, exon-intron junctions, and flanking untranslated regions (UTRs) for the presence of mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several PCa cell lines and matched tumor-normal tissues from Caucasian Americans (CAs) and African Americans (AAs). We used bidirectional sequencing, allele-specific PCR, and bioinformatics to identify the genetic changes in GRM1 and to predict their functional role. A novel missense mutation identified at C1744T (582 Pro > Ser) position of GRM1 gene in a primary AA-PCa cell line (E006AA) was predicted to affect the protein stability and functions. Another novel mutation identified at exon-intron junction of exon-8 in C4-2B cell line resulted in alteration of the GRM1 splicing donor site. In addition, we found missense SNP at T2977C (993 Ser > Pro) position and multiple non-coding mutations and SNPs in 3′-UTR of GRM1 gene in PCa cell lines and tissues. These novel mutations may contribute to the disease by alterations in GRM1 gene splicing, receptor activation, and post-receptor downstream signaling.
Citation: Ali S, Shourideh M, Koochekpour S (2014) Identification of Novel GRM1 Mutations and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines and Tissues. PLoS ONE 9(7): e103204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103204
Editor: Mohammad Saleem, Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, United States of America
Received: April 16, 2014; Accepted: June 25, 2014; Published: July 25, 2014
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by R01MD005824, R21CA183892, and R21CA181152 grants to Dr. Shahriar Koochekpour. Additional support was provided by Roswell Park Cancer Institute and National Cancer Institute grant #P30 CA016056. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Glutamate signaling leads to activation of multiple downstream signaling cascades. These downstream signaling cascades include (i) activation of ligand-gated ion channels (known as ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs)) and influx of Ca2+ and/or K+ ions in central and peripheral nervous systems [1], (ii) activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) known as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and second messenger pathways such as phospholipase C (PLC), phosphoinositide 3 kinase/retrovirus AK thymoma/mTOR (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) [2], and (iii) activation of G-protein-independent signal transduction pathways, mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and protein kinase C (PKC)/ERK1/2 pathways [3], [4]. Last two signaling cascades, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK have extensively been implicated in multiple human cancers and emphasize the role of glutamate signaling in tumorigenesis [4].
mGluRs comprise a basic characteristic architecture: a large bi-lobed extracellular amino-terminal domain (ATD) also known as “venus fly trap” with a specific sequence of 24 amino acid for glutamate binding site, a 70 amino acid cysteine-rich domain (CRD) required for dimerization after activation, followed by classic seven alpha-helical transmembrane domain, and an intracellular cytoplasmic tail domain (CTD) [5]. Various isoforms of Group I mGluRs (mGluR1) have been identified depending on the length of C-terminal domain [5]. This C-terminal domain comprises a proline-rich Homer1 binding motif (isoform a), which involves in intricate protein-protein interactions and complex formation with downstream molecules [6]. Truncation of CTD leads to the loss of Homer1 binding motif in isoforms b-d and thus affects the interaction with other downstream signaling molecules and pathways [5]. Presence of different length isoforms of GRM1 gene with varying role in subsequent activation of downstream signaling pathways, highlight the importance of splicing mechanisms in GRM1 gene function [5].
mGluRs signaling was initially implicated in cellular proliferation of glioma cells [7] and melanoma development [8] either in in vitro or in vivo studies and subsequently this receptor was shown to play a crucial role in various types of cancers [9], [10], [11], [12] Oncogenic function of mGluR1 was shown by the induction of transformed phenotype with overexpression of GRM1 gene in melanocytes [13]. Similarly, in our previous study, we investigated the expression of mGluR1 in primary and metastatic PCa cell lines and tissues [10]. PCa cells growth dependence on GRM1-signalling was also demonstrated by glutamate blockade or use of Riluzole, as a GRM1 antagonist or an inhibitor of glutamate release. Riluzole reduced the PCa cells proliferation, migration, invasion, and induced apoptosis as shown by increased expression level of cleaved caspase-9, -7, -3, PARP, and phopho-H2AXser139 [10].
Somatic mutations have been identified in different domains of mGluRs, including ligand-binding domain, transmembrane domain and cytosolic domain in various types of cancer [4]. Missense mutations of mGluR identified in different domains might have biological relevance in cancers. In fact, somatic mutations in the mGluRs have been reported to promote breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma growth and progression in vivo [11], [12], [14]. Esseltine and colleague [15] studied the functional consequences of multiple missense mutations identified in different domains of mGluRs in several types of cancers including lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, high-grade astrocytoma, and breast cancers. These missense mutations in different domains of mGluRs affect receptor expression and provide selective advantage to different downstream signaling pathways (e.g., PI3k/Akt/mTOR, ERK1/2 activation) and changes in cellular morphology.
Few reports exist for GRM1 mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PCa cell lines or tissues. These studies are limited to whole-exome sequencing and transcriptome analysis. These high throughput assays are unable to identify intron-exon junctions or non-coding variants and require further experimental validation of the identified mutations. In addition, these studies did not include African American (AA)-PCa samples and cell lines for GRM1 mutation or SNP detection. To overcome these limitations, we screened full-length GRM1 gene including all exons, exon-intron junctions, and flanking non-coding 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) to identify genetic alterations in several PCa cell lines and matched tumor-normal tissues in AAs and Caucasian Americans (CAs). We identified novel mutations and SNPs in GRM1 gene. Functional consequences of these mutations were predicted using available online bioinformatics tools.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines
We screened the genomic DNA of ten PCa cell lines (PC-3, E006AA, DU-145, MDA-PCa2b, 22RV1, LAPC4, VCaP, CWR-R1, LNCaP, C4-2B) and normal prostate epithelial cell for detection of mutations and polymorphisms in coding region, flanking untranslated regions (5′- and 3′- UTRs), and exon-intron junctions of full length GRM1 gene.
Castrate-resistant (PC-3, DU-145, MDA-PCa2b, VCap, and 22RV1) and androgen- stimulated (LNCaP and LAPC4) PCa cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassa, VA) [16], [17]. Normal prostate epithelial cells (NL-Pr.EC) and C4-2B cell lines were purchased from Clonetics (Bio Whittaker, Walkersville, MD) and UROCOR (Uroscience Group, Oklahoma City, OK) respectively. E006AA was established from an AA patient with organ-confined PCa [16]. CWR-R1 cell line was provided as a gift from Dr. Elizabeth Wilson (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) [18]. PC-3, DU-145, and VCaP cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, 10%) and antibiotics (1%). E006AA, 22RV1, CWR-R1, C4-2B, and LNCaP cell lines were cultured in RPMI1640 with FBS (10%) and antibiotic (1%). MDA-PCa2b cell line was cultured in define medium as recommended by the manufacturer (ATCC, Manassa, VA). LAPC4 cell lines was culture in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic.
Tumor Samples and Ethical Statement
To evaluate genetic alterations in GRM1 gene, we included a total of 21 matched prostate normal-tumor samples obtained from AAs (n = 10) and CAs (n = 11). All tissues biospecimens were obtained from biospecimen core facility at the Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium (LCRC) affiliated to Tulane Medical School and School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC, New Orleans, LA). Pre-informed written consent form was obtained from each patient during samples collection for use of their samples in scientific discoveries and the study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) at LSUHSC. Matched normal-tumor tissues were available for eight cases (N3-T3; N4-T4; N5-T5; N13-T13; N21-T21; N35-T35; N52-T52; N71-T71) of CAs and six cases (N2-T2; N6-T6; N26-T26; N27-T27; N32-T32; N38-T38) of AA patients.
Genomic DNA Isolation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, and Sequencing of GRM1 Gene
Genomic DNAs were isolated from prostate tissues and cell lines using AllPrep DNA/RNA Quigen kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Full-length GRM1 gene (isoform α) was selected (NM_000838.3) to design the primers covering all exons, exon-intron junctions, and 5′- and 3′-UTRs. This transcript comprises total of nine exons. Based on mutations and SNPs discovered in exon-8 and -9 in PCa cell lines, we selected these regions for further sequencing in matched tumor-normal tissues. Primer designing was performed using PrimerSelect tool of DNASTAR lasergene 9 core suit (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). A total of 9492 bp was amplified in sixteen amplicons including the flanking 50–100 bp covering the exon-intronic sequence. Primer details (sequence, melting temperature, and amplicon size) are provided in Table S1. Each genomic DNA sample (total 25 ng) was amplified by 32 cycles in 10 µl total volume of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) containing specific primers (0.2 µM), dNTPs (0.2 mM), MgCl2 (1.5 mM); GoTaq DNA polymerase (0.75 U) in 1x PCR Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR products were purified by treating with 5 U of Exonuclease-I (Exo-1) and 2 U of Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP) along with 1x buffer at 37 oC for 2–3 hours followed by heat-inactivation of enzymes at 85 oC for 20 minutes. After Exo-SAP treatment, PCR products were diluted to 15 ng/µl concentration. PCR product specificity, quantity, and quality were analyzed by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Bi-directional sequencing of the PCR products was performed at Genomic core facility (RPCI, Buffalo) using ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA). Data were analyzed using sequence analysis software and verified by visual examination of the identified variants in electropherogram.
Allele-Specific Genotyping of C1744T Mutation in Tumor Samples
We developed an allele-specific PCR-based genotyping method to evaluate the non-synonymous mutation identified by direct sequencing of GRM1 gene at C1744T (582 Pro>Ser) position in E006AA cell line. For bi-directional amplification of this specific mutation, four primers were designed (Table S1, Primer numbers 19 to 22), two outer primers and two allele-specific (AS) inner primers with their 3′- end specificity to each allele (C>T). C-allele is amplified in one direction with an AS inner primer and an outer primer pair (#19 and #20; amplicon size 439 bp), whereas mutant T-allele is amplified in the opposite direction with the other inner and outer primer pair (#21 and #22; amplicon size 297 bp). The two outer primers also amplify a constant fragment (#20 and #22; amplicon size 736 bp), which serve as positive controls for PCR. All four primers were used in single reaction and PCR conditions were optimized by adjusting the concentration of each primer and annealing temperatures (Table S1). In every set of PCR reaction, we included a positive and a negative control sample to observe the efficiency of the AS-genotyping.
Bioinformatic Analysis of Identifies Novel GRM1 Mutations
Novel mutations identified in GRM1 gene were tested bioinformatically for different possible effects on protein structure, function, and splice site variant. The effect of missense mutation (serine to proline) at 582 aa position was tested using online tools; (i) PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) [19], (ii) SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/) [20], and (iii) Phd-SNP (http://gpcr2.biocomp.unibo.it/cgi/predictors/PhD-SNP/PhD-SNP.cgi) [21].
To predict the potential structural consequence of the identified mutation at exon-intron junctions of exon-8 in GRM1 gene, we used two different online bioinformatics tools: (a) Human splicing finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF/) [22] and (b) ESEfinder (http://rulai.cshl.edu/tools/ESE/) [23]. DNA sequence comprising wild type or mutant allele was used as a query in Human Splice Finder tool to predict the splicing donor or acceptor site.
Results
Identification of Novel GRM1 Mutations and SNPs in prostate cancer cell lines
Sequencing of whole exons of GRM1 gene in 10 PCa cell lines showed 18 genetic alterations that include newly identified non-synonymous mutations, splice-site variations, non-synonymous, synonymous, and non-coding polymorphisms (Figure 1 and 2; Table 1–2). A novel non-synonymous mutation at C1744T (582 Pro>Ser) position of exon-8 was detected in E006AA, a primary AA-PCa cell line (Figure 1). This mutation was appeared in heterozygous status (CC>CT) and located close to transmembrane domain at extra cellular side of GRM1 receptor and resulted in proline (hydrophilic amino acid, codon-CCT) to serine (neutral amino acid, codon-TCT) amino acid change (Figure 2). Second novel mutation was identified at exon-intron junction of exon-8 in C4-2B, a castrate-resistant PCa cell line (Figure 1, Table 1). This mutation resulted in G to T conversion at the start of intron-8 and appeared in heterozygous condition. Five non-coding mutations were also found in 3′-UTR region of exon-9 of GRM1 gene in two different PCa cell lines (LAPC4 and MDA-PCa2b) (Table 2). One of these mutations is located at 2149 bp downstream of stop codon in LAPC4 and reported in NCBI data base (dbSNP build 139) as rs41285865. While other four mutations located at 221 bp, 486 bp, 2664 bp and 2737 bp downstream to stop codon in MDA-PCa2b cell line (Table 2). These mutations reported in NCBI data base (dbSNP build 139) as rs362827, rs6918099, rs79394543 and rs362829 respectively.
Apart from these mutations, one missense SNP (rs6923492) was identified at 993 amino acid position in cell lines investigated. Homozygous TT genotype was observed in PC-3, 22RV1, CWR-R1 cell lines, and NL-Pr.EC. Heterozygous TC genotype was discovered in MDA-PCa2b and VCaP cell lines, and homozygous CC genotype in E006AA, DU-145, LAPC4, C4-2B, LNCaP cell lines. At this locus, change of T to C nucleotide resulted in Serine (TCC) to Proline (CCC) conversion. This missense polymorphism is located in cytoplasmic domain of GRM1 receptor between transmembrane domain and coiled-coil motif (Figure 2). Four previously reported synonymous polymorphisms were also identified in coding sequence of exon-9 at 931 (rs2942), 1056 (rs6923864), 1071 (rs1047006) and 1165 amino acid (rs9373491) positions (Table 1). Six non-coding SNPs were found in 3′-UTR of GRM1 gene and these polymorphisms are located at 637 bp (rs362819), 1277 bp (rs3804294), 1278 bp (rs3804293), 1369 bp (rs362820), 2392 bp (rs362821) and 2616 bp (rs362822) downstream to stop codon (Table 2).
Identification of GRM1 Mutations and SNPs in Prostate Cancer Tissues
Sequencing of selected exons-8 and -9 of GRM1 gene in prostate tumor tissues showed multiple genetic alterations. A homozygous genotype status (CC genotype) compared to heterozygous genotype (CT genotype) in adjacent normal tissue at 637 bp downstream (rs362819) to stop codon was found in an AA tumor (N38-T38 samples, Table 3). Another two genotypes (CC and GA) were found in 3′-UTR region only in AA samples at position 221 bp (rs362827; N2-T2) and 486 bp (rs6918099; N6-T6, N32-T32 and N38-T38) downstream to stop codon. However, these changes were of germline origin. Since the heterozygous genotype (GA at rs6918099) at 486 bp downstream to stop codon was found in 3 out of 11 AAs, it appears to be an ethnic-specific genotype. The homozygous CC genotype (rs362827) that exists only in a single AA-patient may be a sporadic germ line mutation or a rare variant.
Similar to cell line sequencing data, we identified a missense polymorphism (rs6923492) at 993 amino acid position leading serine to proline amino acid change and was observed in 7 out of 10 AAs (N2-T2, N26-T26, N27-T27, N32-T32, T62, T25, T11) and 5 out of 11 CAs (N3-T3, N5-T5, N21-T21, T20, T34) tissues (Table 3). A non-coding SNP (rs362819) was found at 637 bp downstream to stop codon. The genotype status for these SNPs in tumor tissues was same to adjacent normal tissue, indicating germ line polymorphisms (Table 3). Two synonymous polymorphisms were also found in exon-9 in both AAs and CAs populations. These were located at 931 amino acid position (rs2942) and code for lysine residue, while another synonymous polymorphism located at 1056 amino acid position (rs6923864) code for glycine residue.
Using allele-specific (AS) PCR primers and direct sequencing in matched tumor-normal tissues, we genotyped the newly identified non-synonymous mutation at C1744T (582 Pro>Ser) position (in E006AA) and the mutation at exon-intron junction of exon-8 (in C4-2B). These mutations were not detected in any of the malignant prostate tissues (Figure 3).
Presence of C-allele showed amplification of a 439 bp fragment and presence of T-allele showed amplification of a 267 bp fragment. A nonspecific fragment of 706 bp was amplified in all samples.
Predicted Functions of the Identified GRM1 mutations
The prediction of functional role of novel non-synonymous (582 Pro>Ser) mutation identified in GRM1 was carried out using different tools. PolyPhen-2 predicted a deleterious Bayes posterior probability score value 0.60 for this mutation. This prediction score is based on multiple sequence alignment with homologous sequence of this gene in database and indicate that the mutation affects the protein stability or its function.
Independently analyzed, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) algorithm also predicted an intolerance score value 0.02 for amino acid substitution identified at this locus. Based on protein sequence conservation throughout the evolution, SIFT predicted that 582 Pro>Ser amino acid substitution may also affect protein function. Furthermore, we used PhD-SNP method that utilizes available disease-related SNP database and machine learning technique to predict nsSNP related to human disease. This analysis revealed disease-relevant of the 582 Pro>Ser mutation with a reliability index value of 3.
Since point mutations at exon-intron or intron-exon junction may lead to exon slipping or alternative splicing, we were interested to analyze the potential effect of the novel mutation discovered at exon-intron junction of exon 8 in C4-2B cell line. For this, we employed the Human Splicing Finder (HSF) and Exon Splicing Enhancer (ESE) finder tools to predict the consequence on splice site motif with two different alleles of identified mutation [22], [23]. We found that the presence of T-allele strongly predicts the possibility of splice donor motif (caaGtgagt) with a high consensus value of 88.26. However, substitution of T- to G-allele resulted in loss of this splice donor motif (Figure 4A and 4B). Likewise, the ESEfinder predicted a high score (9.49) motif (exonic-splicing enhancer) for sequence with G-allele at the exon 8-intron junction of GRM1 gene. However, this score reduced to -7.52 for motif sequence with mutant T-allele.
Twenty one base pair sequence flanking of mutation site with wild type (A) and mutant allele (B) was tested for prediction of splicing site motif (donor or acceptor).
Discussion
GRM1 signaling has been implicated in multiple malignant cancers including colon adenocarcinoma, melanoma, lung carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, breast carcinoma, astrocytoma, neuroblastoma and rabdomyosarcoma [4], [5], [24]. Glutamate receptor gained a particular interest given its transforming potential and the availability of its ligand, glutamate, in the context of tumor microenvironment and easily accessibility of receptor at the surface of tumor cells. Differential expression, activation status or signal reprogramming of glutamate receptor in tumor cells can contribute to cancer development and progression. These alterations may arise from specific changes including somatic and germline genetic alterations, copy number variation, epigenetic, and post-translational changes resulting in altered expression or activation and thereby enhancing tumor progression and metastasis [25].
Deep sequencing studies have shown that G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) are mutated in approximately 20% of all cancer and glutamate receptor family represent a second most frequently mutated GPCRs family member [26]. Somatic mutations in GRM1 has been reported in wide varieties of tumors such as melanoma, breast carcinoma, colon carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, brain tumors, heamatopoitic, and lymphoid tissue [15]. GRM1 gene comprises of different domains with specific functions, including ligand-binding domain, cysteine-rich domain for dimerization, transmembrane, and C-terminal domain for interaction with downstream signaling molecules. Mutations in these conserved residues might play a possible role in binding of GRM1 receptor with ligand, signaling initiation, transmission of signal, or termination or gain of function phenotypes. These mutations may not only involve in tumor development and progression but also affect metastasis including cell motility and promotion of angiogenesis.
Previous studies have shown that mutations in different G-protein coupled receptor, CCK2R and GRM1 are associated with altered receptor function, downstream signaling pathways, altered cellular morphology, migration, and promote angiogenesis, leading to enhanced tumerogenesis [15], [27]. Esseltine et al studied the functional role of GRM1 mutations located at glutamate-bonding site (A168V), glutamate-binding domain (R375G), cysteine-rich region (G396V), G-protein binding region (R696W), and homer binding region (P1148L) in the carboxy-terminal tail of GRM1 receptor [15]. Transient expression of the mutated GRM1 was associated with either reduced cell surface expression or basal/quisqualate-stimulated activation of inositol phosphate (IP) and/or ERK1/2 activation [15]. Mutation in homer-binding region (P1148L) was shown to alter cellular morphology and might affect cellular migration.
Although multiple mutations have been reported in GRM1 gene in different human cancers [4], only a limited number of high-throughput studies including whole exome sequencing or transcriptome analysis were carried out and identified few GRM1 mutations in PCa samples [28], [29]. Two novel mutations (R868H and G144S) in GRM1 (Table S2) were identified by sequencing the exomes of 50 lethal catrate-resistant PCa, 11 high-grade primary organ-confind PCa samples (treatment naïve) and 11 PCa cell lines [29]. Exome sequencing of 112 prostate tumor/normal pairs identified two missense mutations (A573E and R681H) in GRM1 gene [28]. A nonsense mutation was also reported in exon-2 of GRM1 gene (TCGA: https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/).
Exome or transcriptome sequence analysis have their inherent limitations including the inability to detect mutations in exon-intron junctions or noncoding region and the need for further experimental validation of the identified mutations [28]. Further, these studies did not include the AA-tumor samples or their cell lines. Due to these limitations, we screened, for the first time, the entire exonic region of GRM1 gene including flanking 5′- and 3′-UTRs and exon-intron junctions in ten commonly used PCa cell lines including the two established AA-PCa cell lines (E006AA and MDA-PCa2B), and 21 matched prostate tumor-normal tissues from 11 CAs and 10 AAs patients.
In this study, we identified two novel mutations in E006AA and C4-2B cell lines. These mutations were not identified in previous studies based on their study design or the cell lines included for sequencing [29]. Non-synonymous mutation (C to T) at 582 amino acid position resulted in proline to serine change. This mutation is located near transmembrane domain at extracellular side. Bioinformatics prediction of functional role of this mutation, using multiple analytical tools, showed the conversion of hydrophilic (Serine) to neutral (Proline) amino acid is either intolerant or leads to deleterious effect to protein stability and function. A conversion from serine to proline amino acid may also affect the strength of signal transmission after ligand binding and GRM1 receptor activation. Another mutation identified in exon-intron boundary of GRM1 exon-8 in C4-2B cell line.
Bioinformatics analysis using two different online tools predicted that G to T nucleotide conversion at this position resulted in disruption of splicing donor site. Disruption of splicing-site motif at exon-intron junction at exon-8 position may provide the basis for creating different splice variants in GRM1 gene. Various isoforms of GRM1 gene with different protein length are associated with differential activation of downstream signals either through changes in the signal strength or interaction with other cytosolic proteins [30]. Further studies are required to validate the functional role of novel mutations of GRM1 gene identified in this study and those by other investigators [28], [29]. Four additional mutations were identified in MDA-PCa2b and one mutation in LAPC4 cell line located in 3′-UTR of GRM1 gene and these mutations have been reported in NCBI data base (dbSNP Build 39) in different populations. These mutations occurred as germline alterations in tumor samples investigated and we observed that the frequency of these mutations is high in AA tumor samples as compared to CAs. High frequency of these mutations observed in AA samples may associate with differential GRM1 expression and function, which may result in the progression or more severity of the disease. AA population has shown a high incidence and mortality rate and presents a clinically more aggressive disease than CAs. The functional role of these mutations has not been reported in literature [31].
A missense polymorphism (rs6923492 T>C) identified in exon-9 of GRM1 gene in PCa cell lines and tumors resulted in serine to proline change at 993 amino acid position at cytoplasmic end of receptor. Previous study using 1000 breast cancer patients showed association of this SNP in ER+/PR+ ductal carcinoma in TT-genotype carrier with later age at diagnosis (4.9 years) as compared to either TC- and CC-genotype carriers [32]. However, no association was found with melanoma susceptibility [33]. A larger tumor samples study is required to confirm the association of this SNP with susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis, aggressiveness and progression.
Conclusions
In this study, we identified novel mutations in GRM1 gene in addition to previously reported mutations and SNPs in PCa cell lines and also in a subset of malignant prostate tissues. These novel mutations were predicted to play an important role in gene function including protein stability and splicing of different isoforms. Functional validation of these mutations will further strengthen the role of genetic alterations of GRM1 gene in prostate carcinogenesis and progression.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Details of primers used for sequencing of GRM1 gene. Genomic sequences of primers used for PCR and sequencing in accordance with Human Genome Assembly (GRM1 gene accession # NM_000838.3).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103204.s001
(DOC)
Table S2.
Details of somatic mutations in GRM1 gene identified in whole exome or transcriptome sequencing studies of prostate cancer cell lines and tumors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103204.s002
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SK SA. Performed the experiments: SA MS. Analyzed the data: SK SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SK SA MS. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SK SA.
References
- 1. Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, et al. (2010) Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 62: 405–496.
- 2. Conn PJ, Pin JP (1997) Pharmacology and functions of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37: 205–237.
- 3. Mao L, Yang L, Tang Q, Samdani S, Zhang G, et al. (2005) The scaffold protein Homer1b/c links metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase cascades in neurons. J Neurosci 25: 2741–2752.
- 4. Willard SS, Koochekpour S (2013) Glutamate signaling in benign and malignant disorders: current status, future perspectives, and therapeutic implications. Int J Biol Sci 9: 728–742.
- 5. Willard SS, Koochekpour S (2013) Glutamate, glutamate receptors, and downstream signaling pathways. Int J Biol Sci 9: 948–959.
- 6. Shiraishi-Yamaguchi Y, Furuichi T (2007) The Homer family proteins. Genome Biol 8: 206.
- 7. D'Onofrio M, Arcella A, Bruno V, Ngomba RT, Battaglia G, et al. (2003) Pharmacological blockade of mGlu2/3 metabotropic glutamate receptors reduces cell proliferation in cultured human glioma cells. J Neurochem 84: 1288–1295.
- 8. Pollock PM, Cohen-Solal K, Sood R, Namkoong J, Martino JJ, et al. (2003) Melanoma mouse model implicates metabotropic glutamate signaling in melanocytic neoplasia. Nat Genet 34: 108–112.
- 9. Prickett TD, Samuels Y (2012) Molecular pathways: dysregulated glutamatergic signaling pathways in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18: 4240–4246.
- 10. Koochekpour S, Majumdar S, Azabdaftari G, Attwood K, Scioneaux R, et al. (2012) Serum glutamate levels correlate with Gleason score and glutamate blockade decreases proliferation, migration, and invasion and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 18: 5888–5901.
- 11. Martino JJ, Wall BA, Mastrantoni E, Wilimczyk BJ, La Cava SN, et al. (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (Grm1) is an oncogene in epithelial cells. Oncogene 32: 4366–4376.
- 12. Speyer CL, Smith JS, Banda M, DeVries JA, Mekani T, et al. (2012) Metabotropic glutamate receptor-1: a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132: 565–573.
- 13. Teh JL, Chen S (2012) Glutamatergic signaling in cellular transformation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 25: 331–342.
- 14. Choi KY, Chang K, Pickel JM, Badger JD 2nd, Roche KW (2011) Expression of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) induces melanoma in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 15219–15224.
- 15. Esseltine JL, Willard MD, Wulur IH, Lajiness ME, Barber TD, et al. (2013) Somatic mutations in GRM1 in cancer alter metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 intracellular localization and signaling. Mol Pharmacol 83: 770–780.
- 16. Koochekpour S, Maresh GA, Katner A, Parker-Johnson K, Lee TJ, et al. (2004) Establishment and characterization of a primary androgen-responsive African-American prostate cancer cell line, E006AA. Prostate 60: 141–152.
- 17. Koochekpour S, Zhuang YJ, Beroukhim R, Hsieh CL, Hofer MD, et al. (2005) Amplification and overexpression of prosaposin in prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 44: 351–364.
- 18. Wainstein MA, He F, Robinson D, Kung HJ, Schwartz S, et al. (1994) CWR22: androgen-dependent xenograft model derived from a primary human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 54: 6049–6052.
- 19. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, et al. (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7: 248–249.
- 20. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4: 1073–1081.
- 21. Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Casadio R (2006) Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 22: 2729–2734.
- 22. Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Beroud G, Claustres M, et al. (2009) Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e67.
- 23. Cartegni L, Wang J, Zhu Z, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR (2003) ESEfinder: A web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3568–3571.
- 24. Rzeski W, Turski L, Ikonomidou C (2001) Glutamate antagonists limit tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 6372–6377.
- 25. Elia J, Glessner JT, Wang K, Takahashi N, Shtir CJ, et al. (2012) Genome-wide copy number variation study associates metabotropic glutamate receptor gene networks with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nat Genet 44: 78–84.
- 26. O'Hayre M, Vazquez-Prado J, Kufareva I, Stawiski EW, Handel TM, et al. (2013) The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13: 412–424.
- 27. Willard MD, Lajiness ME, Wulur IH, Feng B, Swearingen ML, et al. (2012) Somatic mutations in CCK2R alter receptor activity that promote oncogenic phenotypes. Mol Cancer Res 10: 739–749.
- 28. Barbieri CE, Baca SC, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, Blattner M, et al. (2012) Exome sequencing identifies recurrent SPOP, FOXA1 and MED12 mutations in prostate cancer. Nat Genet 44: 685–689.
- 29. Grasso CS, Wu YM, Robinson DR, Cao X, Dhanasekaran SM, et al. (2012) The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487: 239–243.
- 30. DiRaddo JO, Pshenichkin S, Gelb T, Wroblewski JT (2013) Two newly identified exons in human GRM1 express a novel splice variant of metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor. Gene 519: 367–373.
- 31. Platz EA, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Kantoff PW, Giovannucci E (2000) Racial variation in prostate cancer incidence and in hormonal system markers among male health professionals. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 2009–2017.
- 32. Mehta MS, Dolfi SC, Bronfenbrener R, Bilal E, Chen C, et al. (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 expression and its polymorphic variants associate with breast cancer phenotypes. PLoS One 8: e69851.
- 33. Ortiz P, Vanaclocha F, Lopez-Bran E, Esquivias JI, Lopez-Estebaranz JL, et al. (2007) Genetic analysis of the GRM1 gene in human melanoma susceptibility. Eur J Hum Genet 15: 1176–1182.