Research Article

Discovery of a Rare Pterosaur Bone Bed in a Cretaceous Desert with Insights on Ontogeny and Behavior of Flying Reptiles

  • Paulo C. Manzig,

    Affiliations: Centro Paleontológico da UnC (CENPÁLEO), Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil, Programa de Pós-Graduação IEL-Labjor, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Alexander W. A. Kellner mail,

    Affiliation: Laboratory of Systematics and Taphonomy of Fossil Vertebrates, Departamento de Geologia e Paleontologia, Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Luiz C. Weinschütz,

    Affiliation: Centro Paleontológico da UnC (CENPÁLEO), Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil

  • Carlos E. Fragoso,

    Affiliation: Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

  • Cristina S. Vega,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

  • Gilson B. Guimarães,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

  • Luiz C. Godoy,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

  • Antonio Liccardo,

    Affiliation: Departamento de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

  • João H. Z. Ricetti,

    Affiliation: Centro Paleontológico da UnC (CENPÁLEO), Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil

  • Camila C. de Moura

    Affiliation: Centro Paleontológico da UnC (CENPÁLEO), Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil

  • Published: August 13, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100005


A pterosaur bone bed with at least 47 individuals (wing spans: 0.65–2.35 m) of a new species is reported from southern Brazil from an interdunal lake deposit of a Cretaceous desert, shedding new light on several biological aspects of those flying reptiles. The material represents a new pterosaur, Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov., that is the southermost occurrence of the edentulous clade Tapejaridae (Tapejarinae, Pterodactyloidea) recovered so far. Caiuajara dobruskii differs from all other members of this clade in several cranial features, including the presence of a ventral sagittal bony expansion projected inside the nasoantorbital fenestra, which is formed by the premaxillae; and features of the lower jaw, like a marked rounded depression in the occlusal concavity of the dentary. Ontogenetic variation of Caiuajara dobruskii is mainly reflected in the size and inclination of the premaxillary crest, changing from small and inclined (~115°) in juveniles to large and steep (~90°) in adults. No particular ontogenetic features are observed in postcranial elements. The available information suggests that this species was gregarious, living in colonies, and most likely precocial, being able to fly at a very young age, which might have been a general trend for at least derived pterosaurs.


Pterosaurs comprise an extinct group of flying reptiles that have been recovered on all continents [1]. Notwithstanding their distribution, their record is rather patchy, with most occurrences limited to fragmentary remains that in several cases were only briefly reported in the literature [2]. Most pterosaurs are known from ancient coastal or shallow marine deposits and the number of species that lived deep inside the continents is limited [3], [4], particularly from desert environments [5]. Most species are based on one incomplete individual, and aside from one potential exception of a collection of flattened specimens [6], no pterosaur accumulation can be regarded as a bone bed preserving several individuals that can confidently be assigned to the same species and at least potentially be regarded as representing the same or successive populations [7]. This has hampered the discussion of several biological questions regarding those animals, such as ontogenetic growth, development of cranial crests, and behavior.

Here we describe a rare pterosaur bone bed composed of hundreds of bones from the outskirts of Cruzeiro do Oeste, southern Brazil. The deposits correspond to the Caiuá Group [8] that represents a sand sea formed in an interior paleodesert whose paleontological content was up to know limited to infrequent tetrapod ichnofossils [9], [10] (Figure 1). This exceptional occurrence, combined with the large number of three-dimensionally preserved individuals, sheds new light on the biology of those rather enigmatic volant animals.


Figure 1. Localization and stratigraphic framework of the new pterosaur locality.

(A) Map of South America and the geographic position of Cruzeiro do Oeste. (B) Stratigraphic chart showing the relation between the distinct stratigraphic units of the Bauru Basin [10]. (C) Detailed stratigraphic section of the quarried beds of the Goio-Erê Formation, showing the location where the fossils were recovered.


Materials and Methods

Phylogenetic Analysis

In order to determine the phylogenetic position of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov., we performed a phylogenetic analysis using PAUP 4.0b10 for Microsoft Windows [11] using the TBR heuristic searches performed using maximum parsimony. Characters were given equal weight and treated as unordered (ACCTRAN setting). This analysis is based on previous cladistic studies (List S3 in File S1).

Nomenclatural Acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under the Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the previx “”. The LSID for this publication is:​F56-9279-B12CFA222337.The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archieved and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.

All permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The permit for collecting the specimens was issued by the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (DNPM, Brasília), under the number DNPM n° 48400-000807/2012-94. See appropriate section of Systematic Paleontology for locality, stratigraphy and repository, and specimen numbers.


Systematic Paleontology

Pterosauria Kaup, 1834

Pterodactyloidea Plieninger, 1901

Azhdarchoidea Nessov, 1984

Tapejaridae Kellner, 1989

Tapejarinae Kellner, 1989 sensu Kellner & Campos [12]

Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov.

ZooBank Life Science Identifier (LSID) for genus.​065-9FC1-11EB1960BF5C

ZooBank LSID for species.​C25-A6BE-B69AB448D93B


Combination of Caiuá and Tapejara, the internal specifier of the Tapejarinae [13]; species honors Alexandre Dobruski, who with his son, João Dobruski, found the new site back in 1971.


Partial skeleton including skull and lower jaw, cervical vertebrae and wing elements (CP.V 1449), housed at the Centro Paleontológico (CENPALEO) of the Universidade do Contestado, Mafra, Santa Catarina, Brazil (Figures 2, 3).


Figure 2. Holotype (CP.V 1449 left) and one paratype (CP.V 2003, right) of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov. separated by a red line, showing skull and postcranial elements.

Scale bar equals 100: cor, coracoid; cv, cervical vertebra; d, dentary; dca, distal carpal series; dcr, dentary crest; f, frontal; hu, humerus; hy, hyoid bone; l, left; man, mandible; mcfo, meckelian fossa; mcI-III, metacarpal I–III; mcIV, metacarpal IV; oc, occipital condyle; p, parietal; pmcr, premaxillary crest; ph1d4, first phalanx of manual digit IV; ph2d4, second phalanx of manual digit IV; ph4d4, forth phalanx of manual digit IV; pof, postfrontal; ptd, pteroid; q, quadrate; r, right; ra, radius; ri, rib; un, ungueal.


Figure 3. Skull of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov. (holotype, CP.V 1449) with the shape of an adult individual.

Scale bar equals 50: d, dentary; dcr, dentary crest; dep, depression; exp, ventral expansion of the premaxilla; f, frontal; fcr, frontal crest; fo, foraminae; m, maxilla; oc, occipital condyle; op, opisthotic; p, parietal; pm, premaxilla; pmcr, premaxillary crest; q, quadrate; soc, supraoccipital. The quadrate is inverted.


CP.V 865, consisting of the anterior portion of a skull, the posterior portion of the lower jaw, the right jugal, vertebrae, ribs and metatarsals; CP.V 867, rostral end of a skull and long bones; CP.V 868, rostral end of a skull, wing elements and other postcranial bones; CP.V 869, incomplete skeleton with a partial vertebral column (posterior cervicals vertebrae, dorsal elements to the first five caudal vertebrae), right humerus, radius and ulna, carpal elements, coracoid, sternum, some wing phalanges, gastralia, pelvic elements and the right femur; CP.V 870, incomplete postcranial elements, with humeri and pectoral girdle; CP.V 871, fused right scapulocoracoid and incomplete long bones; CP.V 872, partial skeleton including a fragmentary skull, lower jaw, right humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, cervical vertebrae and other long bones; CP.V 873, rostral end of a skull and manual phalanges; CP.V 999, partial skull; CP.V 1001, one incomplete skull with elongated premaxillary crest and lower jaw, and postcranial elements of at least three individuals, wing bones (with humeri), cervical vertebrae and pelvic elements; CP.V 1003, incomplete skull and the rostral tip of the lower jaw; CP.V 1004, rostral end of a skull; CP.V 1005, incomplete skull with an elongated premaxillary crest and a complete lower jaw; CP.V 1006, partial skull with anterior rostral end missing, with large premaxillary crest and several postcranial bones; CP.V 1023, anterior portion of a skull and several postcranial elements; CP.V 1024, skull and several postcranial bones of at least three small individuals; CP.V 1025, isolated femur; CP.V 1026, isolated femur; CP.V 1450, several small individuals (at least 14); CP.V 2003, skull and lower jaw associated with wing bones; UEPG/DEGEO/MP-4151, two skulls on one slab and postcranial elements; and UEPG/DEGEO/MP-4152, a rostrum and several postcranial elements (Figures 2, 48). For referred specimens, see List S1 in File S1.


Figure 4. Selected cranial material of Caiuajara dobruskii showing anatomical changes during ontogeny.

Note that the cranial crest gets gradually larger in older individuals. From top left to bottom right: CP.V 1050-1 (inverted), CP.V 1050-2 (inverted), CP.V 1003, CP.V 866 (inverted), UEPG/DEGEO/MP-4151, CP.V 1023 (inverted), UEPG/DEGEO/MP-4151 (second skull), CP.V 1001, CP.V 1447, CP.V 1005 (with posterior part of lower jaw reconstructed), CP.V 1449 (holotype). Scale bar, equals 50 mm.


Figure 5. Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov., occlusal view of upper jaw (A) and mandible (B) (CP.V 1449).

Scale bar equals 10; different lower jaws, from from top to bottom: juvenile (CP.V 1450-2) (C); older juvenile (CP.V. 1450-1) (D); young/subadult (CP.V. 1001a-1) (E); and adult (CP.V 1005a) (F) specimen. Scale bar equals 50 mm. Abbreviations: dep, depression; exp, lateral expansion; fo, foraminae.


Figure 6. Selected post-cranial elements of Caiuajara dobruskii showing the anatomical changes during ontogeny.

A, humeri (CP.V 1450 - inverted; CP.V 1009; CP.V 1013); B, femura (CP.V 1883-1; CPV 872a-1; CP.V 1025), scapulocoracoid (CP.V 871b - inverted), coracoids (CP.V 1006-1; CP.V 866b - inverted); and sterna (CP.V 1000; CP.V 1001a-1). Scale bar equals 10 mm.


Figure 7. Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov., (CP.V 869), partial articulated skeleton.

Scale bar equals 50: cdv, caudal vertebrae; dca, distal carpal series; dv, dorsal vertebrae; fe, femur; hu, humerus; il, ilium; prca, proximal carpal series; ptd, pteroid; ppu, prepubis; pu, pubis; ra, radius; ri, ribs; sca, scapula; st, sternum; sv, sacral vertebrae; ul, ulna; wph, wing phalanx.


Figure 8. Hundreds of bones, including at least 14 partial skulls of Caiuajara dobruskii (CP.V. 1450).

Scale bar equals 200: cra - skulls, man - mandible.

Type locality, horizon and age.

Cruzeiro do Oeste, Paraná State, Brazil; Bauru Basin, Caiuá Group, Goio-Erê Formation, Upper Cretaceous [8], [12], [14].


Tapejarine tapejarid with the following autapomorphies: anterior end of the premaxillary strongly deflected ventrally (~142–149°) relative to the ventral margin of the upper jaw; premaxillae with ventral sagittal bony expansion projected inside the nasoantorbital fenestra; rounded depression in the occlusal concavity of the dentary; elongates groove on the anterolateral margin of the quadrate; and marked lateral depression on maxilla ventral to anterior part of the nasoantorbital fenestra. The new species can be further distinguished from other tapejarine pterosaurs by the following combination of characters: ventral margin of the orbit rounded; gap between upper and lower jaws during occlusion wider; and marked depression on ventral side of the pteroid lacking a pneumatic foramen.

Description and Comparisons

Several anatomical features show that Caiuajara belongs to the toothless pterodactyloid clade Tapejaridae [13], such as a premaxillary crest from the anterior rostral end extended above the occipital region, nasoantorbital fenestra elongated comprising more than 40% of the cranial length (Figure 3), and a well-developed tubercle on anterior surface of the coracoid. It further has all synapomorphies of the Tapejarinae, such as the downturned anterior part of the rostrum [12], [13], [15][17], with the inclination varying from about 138° to 150°; most species average 142°. The orbit is piriform, with the ventral margin more rounded than in other tapejarids [15], [18]. The nasoantorbital fenestra anterior margin is wide, similar to other tapejarines [15], [16], [19] but differing from the narrower condition of thalassodromines [12], [20].

The premaxilla is perforated by a large number of foraminae on the lateral and palatal surface, similar to Tapejara, suggesting that the beak was covered by a horny covering analogous to the rhamphoteca in birds. A developed premaxillary sagittal crest is present in the smallest and the largest individuals (Figure 4), casting doubts on previous interpretations that the presence and absence of cranial crests might be sexually dimorphic [21]. The anterior part of the crest is very high similar to Tupandactylus [13], [22], but differs by being more expanded. The occipital portion of the crest, formed by the supraoccipital and parietal, is dorsally curved, differing from the much longer and straighter structure found in Tupandactylus [22]. Starting close to the anterior margin of the nasoantorbital fenestra, the premaxilla has a sagittal bony expansion that extends posteriorly, where it merges with the lateral margin of this opening (Figure 3). This structure, whose function is unknown, is present in all specimens, from the smallest to the largest, and has not been reported in any other pterosaur before (Figure 4). As in Tapejara, Caiuajara shows a deep concavity in the palate restricted to the anterior part, followed by a posterior convexity. Differing from all other tapejarids where the occlusal surface can be observed, some specimens of Caiuajara have a faint longitudinal crest inside the most concave portion of the palate that does not form a palatal ridge as in some thalassodromines [12] and some pteranodontoids [17], [23]. As in other tapejarines, the upper jaw shows a small lateral expansion close to the anterior margin of the nasoantorbital fenestra. The occlusal surface of the dentary also displays a deep concavity as in Tapejara, but Caiuajara differs by showing a distinctive rounded depression (Figure 5). The dentary shows the typical tapejarine step-like dorsal margin and a blunt dentary sagittal crest that is more developed in larger individuals, similar to Tapejara [18] and Europejara [24], but differing from the Chinese tapejarines [15], [16]. There is no helical jaw joint, differing from Caupedactylus [25].

The cervical vertebrae (Figure 2) are slightly elongated, more so than in pteranodontoids [26], but not to the same degree as in archaeopterodactyloids [17], [23] or azhdarchids [27], [28]. The neural spine is blade-like and the centrum pierced laterally by small pneumatic foraminae. One lateral pneumatic opening occurs on each side of the neural canal on the anterior articulation surface. No notarium is developed. The sacrum is formed by five sacrals. The scapula is longer than coracoid, and where complete, the coracoid shows a developed tubercle on the anterior surface (Figure 6). The sternum is semicircular in shape. The humerus displays an elongated deltopectoral crest that is rectangular and slightly curved medially, particularly at the most posterodistal end, but the crest is not warped as in pteranodontoids [17], [23], [26], [29]. About 35 humeri were identified so far (20 right, 14 left and one unidentifiable) with lengths ranging from 31 mm to 115.6 mm. Overall, the radius is thinner than the ulna, but not to the same degree as observed in istiodactylids and anhanguerids [23]. Distal sincarpals show a rectangular shape. The pteroid clearly articulates with the proximal carpal series, showing a developed ventral depression but no pneumatic foramen (Figure 7). Wing metacarpal IV is similar to that seen in other tapejarids, being proportionally longer relative to other wing elements when compared to anhanguerids (Figure 2), but does not approach the extreme elongation reported in nyctosaurids [23], [26]. The femur is bowed and about the same size as the humerus (Figure 6).

A phylogenetic analysis based on a previous study of tapejarid phylogenetic relationships [24] shows that Caiuajara is a member of the Tapejarinae, falling in a polytomy with other tapejarine tapejarids (Figure 9). If Eopteranodon, a poorly described taxon, and Europejara (unfortuntately very incomplete) are removed, Cauiajara falls in a sister group relationship with Tupandactylus, in a trichotomy with Tapejara and Sinopterus+Huaxiapterus, indicating that the known tapejarines from China form a monophyletic entity. This exercise also shows that much more has to be done to resolve the relationships of the Tapejaridae, particularly the Tapejarinae.


Figure 9. Phylogenetic analysis showing the relationships of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov.

Based on Vullo et al. 2012 [23].


Previous studies of pterosaur ontogeny were based on isolated specimens mostly recovered without stratigraphic control that, despite important contributions [30][39], have fostered some controversy, particularly over whether or not the studied specimens represent the same species [40], [41]. Caiuajara is the first case where a pterosaur ontogenetic series is provided based on specimens from a pterosaur bone bed that can be confidently assigned to the same species. The sample also has the advantage of having most elements preserved three-dimensionally and not flattened, avoiding the problems related to change of morphology due to distortion [6], [7], [36]. Regarding postcranial elements, there are few differences from smaller to larger individuals except for size and the tendency for ontogenetically more developed individuals to show more ossified bones, particularly the sternum (Figure 6). The humerus, for example, shows the same proportion in smaller and larger individuals, including the development of the deltopectoral crest that corresponds to about 38–40% of the humerus length. This indicates that the general shape of most postcranial elements is formed at a juvenile stage and does not change significantly, as the animal grows older. The most conspicuous exceptions are the prepubis, with older individuals showing a more developed and larger distal plate, and the coracoid, where ontogenetically more developed individuals display a slightly larger ventral expansion. Furthermore, as reported in other pterodactyloids, the scapula and coracoid are fused in adult individuals but unfused in younger individuals, with the same trend happening in the epiphyses of the humerus and the carpal series [32], [35].

Regarding the skull, the main ontogenetic differences can be found in the rostrum and the cranial crest (Figures 4, 10). Younger individuals display a reduced rostrum that grows, becoming more massive in older individuals. The inclination of the occlusal margin relative to the horizontal plane does not vary significantly, mostly being around 142°. The premaxillary crest, on the contrary, shows marked variation, being reduced and inclined posteriorly for about ~115° relative to the horizontal plane in small individuals. As the animal grew, the crest got rapidly larger and steeper (up to ~90°). Similar changes are observed in the dentary crest, which is almost absent in young individuals and gets more developed in older ones (Figures 5, 10).


Figure 10. Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov., reconstruction of shapes from juveniles (bright color) to adults (darker color).

Outlines not to scale.


Discussion and Conclusions

There are several interesting aspects of this discovery. So far, all other pterosaur material recorded from Brazil comes from the northeastern part of the country [1], and this is the first in the southern part. Besides the Crato and Romualdo formations of Brazil [12], tapejarid pterosaurs have also been recorded in China [15], [16], Morocco [42], and Spain [24], all in deposits that range from the Barremian to the Cenomanian [24]. Based on stratigraphic correlations, the age of the Goio-Erê Formation is regarded as Turonian to Campanian [14], or even having a Coniacian basal limit [10]. Therefore, either Caiuajara is the youngest member of this group known to date, or this deposit is older than previously thought. In any case, Cruzeiro do Oeste is the southernmost occurrence of Tapejarinae recorded so far, suggesting that those pterosaurs, which are regarded to be frugivorous [18], [24], had a cosmopolitan distribution.

The discovery of this pterosaur bone bed also allows inference of some aspects regarding the behavior of the new species that might be applied for other flying reptiles. Caiuajara dobruskii is known from hundreds of bones representing individuals of different sizes that were collected in an area of less than 20 m2. Based on the premaxillae, a minimum of 47 individuals can be established (List S2 in File S1), but the actual number present in this site must be well in the hundreds.

All parts of the skeleton are represented. The skeletons of a few specimens were found articulated (Figure 7) or closely associated (Figure 2), but most are mixed together, making it difficult establish which elements belong to the same individual. In one extreme case, at least 14 individuals could be identified based on the premaxillae in one small block of sandstone (40 cm by 60 cm; more was left in the outcrop) with hundreds of bones, including 11 lower jaws, all belonging to small individuals (Figure 8), indicating that this pterosaur accumulation was partially submitted to hydraulic selection. In several instances, there is indication that bones were broken prior to fossilization and that some might have been exposed more than others before being buried.

Regarding the ontogenetic stage of the recovered specimens, the fact that it is very hard to associated elements to the same individual, makes is difficult to establish with certainty the number of juveniles, sub-adults and adults. However, most of the bones from Caiuajara dobruskii recovered are predominatly small, as can be exemplified by the humerus (Table S1 in File S1) and also the sizes of the skull (Figure 5). Therefore we can observe that most recovered specimens are predominantly juveniles or very young animals, with adults being quite rare, represented by only two skulls and three humeri.

It is also very difficult to establish precisely the wing span variation of the sample collected so far. Comparing the size of several postcranial elements with other tapejarids [1], [15], [16], particularly the humerus, allows us to estimate the wingspan variation of what is presently known of Caiuajara dobruskii between 0.65 and 2.35 m.

Most specimens were collected in two different levels less than 0.5 m apart vertically. A third level of accumulation with hundreds of bones of small individuals in a more restricted area is less than 0.5 m above the last one (Figure 1). A fourth one yielded only isolated elements, indicating distinct events that generated this pterosaur accumulation. Sedimentological data supports the interpretation that the Goio-Erê Formation was formed in a desert environment with interdunal wetland [9], [10]. So far there is no evidence of invertebrate or plant material.

The fact that several pterosaur individuals were found in such close association is compelling evidence that Caiuajara dobruskii was gregarious, as has been suggested based on similar evidences for other extinct reptiles, including dinosaurs [43], [44]. Previous evidences of this kind of social behavior were restricted to some specimens of Quetzalcoatlus sp. found in close proximity [45] and a concentration of the archaeopterodactyloid Pterodaustro in Argentina [6]. Besides those, close associations of pterosaur individuals are exceedingly rare, limited to fragmentary remains of unknown affinity from Chile [5], one duplicate bone in one nodule from the Romualdo Formation [46] and two pterosaur specimens from Kazakhstan [47], making the pterosaur bone bed in Cruzeiro do Oeste particularly important.

Based on the available information, we conclude that Caiuajara dobruskii lived in colonies around an inland lake situated in a desert. Although some parental care might have been possible, the fact that the postcranial skeleton does not differ among juveniles and adults suggests that the new species was precocial and most likely could fly at a very young age. Other researcher have also pointed out to this possibility (e.g., [48], [49]). The taphonomic and geological conditions suggest that individuals died around an oasis over the years, being exposed and gradually disarticulated. The degree of disarticulation was dependent on the exposure time. Episodic events (e.g., desert storms) likely carried the disarticulated and partially articulated skeletons to the bottom of the lake where they got eventually preserved. The presence of three main levels of accumulation in a section of less than one meter suggests that this region was home to pterosaur populations for an extended period of time. It is also plausible that Caiuajara was a migratory pterosaur that visited this area from times to time, although the first possibility is favored here. The causes of death remain unknown, although similarities with dinosaur drought-related mortality are striking [42]. However, it is also possible that desert storms could have been responsible for the occasional demise of these pterosaurs.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Supporting information. List S1, Specimens referred to Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov. List S2, Minimum number of individuals of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov. List S3, Phylogenetic analysis, characters and character matrix. Table S1, Measurements of wing elements of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov. Table S2, Measurements of hindlimb elements and the pteroid of Caiuajara dobruskii gen. et sp. nov.




We thank Valter Pereira da Rocha (Mayor of Municipality of Cruzeiro do Oeste) and João Gustavo Dobruski, Neurides Oliveira Martins and Maristela Sanches Morcelli, all residents of Cruzeiro do Oeste, for their help in the fieldwork. José Alceu Valério, Solange Salete Sprandel da Silva, Ademir Flores, and Itaíra Susko, all from the Universidade do Contestado, are thanked for supporting the research at the CENPALEO. Vilson Greinert is acknowledged for the preparation of several specimens. CEF thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for a scholarship. Juliana Manso Sayão (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco) and an anonymous reviewer are thanked for several suggestions in earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AWAK PCM LCW CEF. Analyzed the data: AWAK PCM LCW CEF CSV GBG LCG AL JHZR CCM. Wrote the paper: AWAK PCM LCW CEF CSV GBG LCG AL JHZR CCM.


  1. 1. Kellner AWA (2006) Pterossauros - os senhores do céu do Brasil. Vieira & Lent, Rio de Janeiro 176p.
  2. 2. Barrett PM, Butler RJ, Edwards NP, Milner (2008) Pterosaur distribution in time and space: an atlas. Zitteliana 28: 61–107.
  3. 3. Wang X, Kellner AWA, Zhou Z, Campos DA (2005) Pterosaur diversity and faunal turnover in Cretaceous terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 437: 875–879.
  4. 4. Witton MP, Naish D (2008) A reappraisal of Azhdarchid pterosaur functional morphology and paleoecology. PLoS ONE 3: e2271.
  5. 5. Bell CM, Padian K (1995) Pterosaur fossils from the Cretaceous of Chile: evidence for a pterosaur colony on an inland desert plain. Geol Mag 132: 31–38.
  6. 6. Chiappe LM, Rivarola D, Romero E, Davila S, Codorniu L (1998) Recent Advances in the Paleontology of the Lower Cretaceous Lagarcito Formation (Parque Nacional Sierra de Las Quijadas, San Luis, Argentina). In Lower and Middle Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems, New Mexico: Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin Lucas SG, Kirkland JI, Estep JW, editors. 14: 187–192.
  7. 7. Kellner AWA, Campos DA, Sayão JM, Saraiva AAF, Rodrigues T, et al. (2013) The largest flying reptile from Gondwana: a new specimen of Tropeognathus cf. T. mesembrinus Wellnhofer, 1987 (Pterodactyloidea, Anhangueridae) and other large pterosaurs from the Romualdo Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 85: 113–135.
  8. 8. Manzig PC, Weinschütz LC (2012) Museus e Fósseis da Região Sul do Brasil: Uma Experiência Visual com a Paleontologia. Curitiba. Ed. Germânica.
  9. 9. Fernandes LA, Sedor FA, Silva RC, Silva LR, Azevedo AA, et al.. (2009) Icnofósseis da Usina Porto Primavera, SP: rastros de dinossauros e de mamíferos em rochas do deserto neocretáceo. In: Winge M, Schobbenhaus C, Souza CRG, Fernandes ACS, Bebert-Born M, Queiroz ET, Campo DA, editors. Sítios Geológicos e Paleontológicos do Brasil. Brasília: CPRM - Serviço Geológico do Brasil p. 479–488.
  10. 10. Milani EJ, Melo JH, Souza PA, Fernandes LA, França AB (2007) Bacia do Paraná. Bol Geoc Petrobras 15: 265–287.
  11. 11. Swofford DL (2000) Paup: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 4.0B10 (for Microsoft Windows) Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland.
  12. 12. Kellner AWA, Campos DA (2007) Short note on the ingroup relationships of the Tapejaridae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea). Boletim do Museu Nacional – Geologia 75: 1–14..
  13. 13. Kellner AWA (2004) New information on the Tapejaridae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) and discussion of the relationships of this clade. Ameghiniana 41: 521–534.
  14. 14. Basilici G, Sgarbi GN, Dal'Bó PFF (2012) A Sub-bacia Bauru: um sistema continental entre deserto e cerrado. In: Geologia do Brasil Beca Hasui Y, et al., editors. 520–543.
  15. 15. Wang X, Zhou Z (2003) A new pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea, Tapejaridae) from the Early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of western Liaoning, China and its implications for biostratigraphy. Chin Sci Bull 48: 16–23.
  16. 16. Lü J, Jin S, Unwin D, Zhao L, Azuma Y, et al. (2006) A new species of Huaxiapterus (Pterosauria: Pterodactyloidea) from the Lower Cretaceous of western Liaoning, China with comments on the systematics of tapejarid pterosaurs. Acta Geol Sin 80: 315–326.
  17. 17. Andres B, Ji Q (2008) A new pterosaur from the Liaoning Province of China, the phylogeny of the Pterodactyloidea, and the convergence in their cervical vertebrae. Palaeontology 51: 453–469.
  18. 18. Wellnhofer P, Kellner AWA (1991) The skull of Tapejara wellnhoferi Kellner (Reptilia, Pterosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Santana Formation of the Araripe Basin, Northeastern Brazil. Mitt Bayer Staatsslg Paläont hist Geol 31: 89–106.
  19. 19. Frey E, Martill DM, Buchy M-C (2003) A new species of tapejarid pterosaur with soft-tissue head crest. In: E. Buffetaut J, Mazin M, editors. Evolution and palaeobiology of pterosaurs. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Pub 217: : 65–72.
  20. 20. Kellner AWA, Campos DA (2002) The function of the cranial crest and jaws of a unique pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil. Science 297: 389–392.
  21. 21. Lu JC, Unwin DM, Deeming DC, Jin X, Liu Y, et al. (2011) An egg-adult association, gender, and reproduction in pterosaurs. Science 331: 321–324.
  22. 22. Pinheiro FL, Fortier DC, Schultz CL, Andrade JAFG, Bantim RAM (2011) New information of the pterosaur Tupandactylus imperator, with comments on the relationships of Tapejaridae. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56: 567–580.
  23. 23. Kellner AWA (2003) Pterosaur phylogeny and comments on the evolutionary history of the group. In: Buffetaut E, Mazin J-M, editors. Evolution and palaeobiology of pterosaurs. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Pub. 217: : 105–137.
  24. 24. Vullo R, Marugán-Lobón J, Kellner AWA, Buscalioni AD, Gomez B, et al. (2012) A new crested pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Spain: the first European tapejarid (Pterodactyloidea: Azhdarchoidea). PLoS ONE 7: e38900.
  25. 25. Kellner AWA (2013) A new unusual tapejarid (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) from the Early Cretaceous Romualdo Formation, Araripe Basin, Brazil. Earth and Environmental Science Transaction of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103: 1–14.
  26. 26. Bennett SC (2001) The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon part 1 - General description and osteology. Palaeontographica 260: 1–112.
  27. 27. Nessov LA (1994) Pterosaurs and birds of the Late Cretaceous of Central Asia. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 1: 47–57.
  28. 28. Averianov AO (2010) The osteology of Azhdarcho lancicollis Nessov, 1984 (Pterosauria, Azhdarchidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 314: 264–317.
  29. 29. Bennett SC (1989) A pteranodontid pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Peru, with comments on the relationships of Cretaceous pterosaurs. J Paleont 63: 669–677.
  30. 30. Wellnhofer P (1970) Die Pterodactyloidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschqften, N F 141: 1–13.
  31. 31. Mateer NJ (1976) A statistical study of the genus Pterodactylus. Bul Geol Inst Univ Uppsala 6: 97–105.
  32. 32. Bennett SC (1993) The ontogeny of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs. Paleobiology 19: 92–106.
  33. 33. Bennett SC (1995) A statistical study of Rhamphorhynchus from the Solnhofen Limestone of Germany: Year-classes of a single large species. J Paleont 69: 569–580.
  34. 34. Bennett SC (1996) Year-classes of pterosaurs from the Solnhofen limestones of Germany: taxonomic and systematic implications. J Vert Paleont 16: 432–444.
  35. 35. Kellner AWA, Tomida Y (2000) Description of a new species of Anhangueridae (Pterodactyloidea) with comments on the pterosaur fauna from the Santana Formation (Aptian-Albian), Northeastern Brazil. Nat Sci Museum Monogr 17: 1–135.
  36. 36. Codorniú L, Chiappe LM (2004) Early juvenile pterosaurs (Pterodactyloidea: Pterodaustro guinazui) from the Lower Cretaceous of central Argentina. Can J Earth Sci 41: 9–18.
  37. 37. Jouve S (2004) Description of the skull of Ctenochasma (Pterosauria) from the latest Jurassic of eastern France, with a taxonomic revision of European Tithonian Pterodactyloidea. J Vert Paleont 24: 542–554.
  38. 38. Bennett SC (2007) A review of the pterosaur Ctenochasma: taxonomy and ontogeny. N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 245: 23–31.
  39. 39. Chinsamy A, Codorniú L, Chiappe L (2008) Developmental growth patterns of the filter-feeder pterosaur, Pterodaustro guinazui. Biol Lett 4: 282–285.
  40. 40. Kellner AWA (2010) Comments on the Pteranodontidae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) with the description of two new species. An Acad Bras Cienc 82: 1063–1084.
  41. 41. Peters D (2011) A catalog of pterosaur pedes for trackmaker identification,. Ichnos 18: 114–141.
  42. 42. Wellnhofer P, Buffetaut E (1999) Pterosaur remains from the Cretaceous of Morocco. Paläontol Z 73: 133–142.
  43. 43. Rogers RR (1990) Taphonomy of three dinosaur bone beds in the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Northwestern Montana: evidence for drought-related mortality. Palaios 5: 394–413.
  44. 44. Dodson P, Forster CA, Sampson SD (2004) Ceratopsidae. In Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska, H, editors. The Dinosauria (second edition). University of California Press: Berkeley pp. 494–513.
  45. 45. Kellner AWA (1994) Remarks on pterosaur taphonomy and paleoecology. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 39: 175–189.
  46. 46. Eck K, Elgin RA, Frey E (2011) On the osteology of Tapejara wellnhoferi Kellner 1989 and the first occurrence of multiple specimen assemblage from the Santana Formation, Araripe Basin, NE-Brazil. Swiss Journal of Palaeontology 130: 277–96.
  47. 47. Costa FR, Alifanov V, Dalla Vecchia FM, Kellner AWA (2013) On the presence of an elongated tail in an undescribed specimen of Batrachognathus volans (Pterosauria: Anurognathidae: Batrachognathinae). In: Rio Ptero 2013 - International Symposium on Pterosaurs, Short Communications 54–56.
  48. 48. Wellnhofer P (1991) The illustrated encyclopedia of pterosaurs. Salamander Books, London 192 p.
  49. 49. Unwin DM, Deming CV (2008) Pterosaur eggshell structure and its implications for pterosaur reproductive biology. Zitteliana 28: 199–207.