Figures
Abstract
Heterogeneity in morphology, physiology and cellular chemistry of plant tissues can compromise successful cryoprotection and cryopreservation. Cryoprotection is a function of exposure time × temperature × permeability for the chosen protectant and diffusion pathway length, as determined by specimen geometry, to provide sufficient dehydration whilst avoiding excessive chemical toxicity. We have developed an innovative method of vacuum infiltration vitrification (VIV) at 381 mm (15 in) Hg (50 kPa) that ensures the rapid (5 min), uniform permeation of Plant Vitrification Solution 2 (PVS2) cryoprotectant into plant embryos and their successful cryopreservation, as judged by regrowth in vitro. This method was validated on zygotic embryos/embryonic axes of three species (Carica papaya, Passiflora edulis and Laurus nobilis) up to 1.6 mg dry mass and 5.6 mm in length, with varying physiology (desiccation tolerances) and 80°C variation in lipid thermal profiles, i.e., visco-elasticity properties, as determined by differential scanning calorimetry. Comparisons between the melting features of cryoprotected embryos and embryo regrowth indicated an optimal internal PVS2 concentration of about 60% of full strength. The physiological vigour of surviving embryos was directly related to the proportion of survivors. Compared with conventional vitrification, VIV-cryopreservation offered a ∼ 10-fold reduction in PVS2 exposure times, higher embryo viability and regrowth and greater effectiveness at two pre-treatment temperatures (0°C and 25°C). VIV-cryopreservation may form the basis of a generic, high throughput technology for the ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources, aiding food security and protection of species from diverse habitats and at risk of extinction.
Citation: Nadarajan J, Pritchard HW (2014) Biophysical Characteristics of Successful Oilseed Embryo Cryoprotection and Cryopreservation Using Vacuum Infiltration Vitrification: An Innovation in Plant Cell Preservation. PLoS ONE 9(5): e96169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096169
Editor: Joshua L. Heazlewood, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, United States of America
Received: December 16, 2013; Accepted: April 3, 2014; Published: May 1, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Nadarajan, Pritchard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Millennium Commission, The Wellcome Trust and Orange plc. The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew receives grant-in-aid from DEFRA, UK. All funders acknowledged in our manuscript had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors received funding from a commercial source, Orange Plc. However, this does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
The vitrification process plays a key role in cryopreservation for the long term conservation of plant genetic resources [1]. Vitrification is defined as a physical process by which a concentrated aqueous solution solidifies into a stable amorphous glass without the formation of ice crystals when the temperature is decreased [2]. Vitrification of plant specimens can be achieved in many ways, including air drying of embryos [3], and more recently through the use of highly concentrated plant vitrification solutions (PVS) that readily form glasses on cooling and inhibit crystallization [2], [4]. However, exposure to PVS must be controlled to enable sufficient cellular dehydration whilst limiting injury from chemical toxicity and establishment of a simple and high-throughput cryopreservation method using cryoprotectant is highly desirable [5]. Plant vitrification solutions combine cryoprotectants that vary in permeability [e.g. dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and glycerol], such that cellular water is replaced, cell viscosity is increased and the freezing behaviour of the remaining water is altered [6], [7]. PVS2 [2] is probably the most commonly used cryoprotectant (CP) for plant cells, tissues and embryos; for example, the cryopreservation of embryonic axes of citrus [8] and in vitro shoot-tips of Parkia speciosa, a tropical species with recalcitrant (desiccation sensitive) seeds [9].
The conventional approach to vitrification generally involves a tissue pre-culture step on sucrose-enriched medium, followed by treatment with a loading solution and dehydration, before cooling, with highly concentrated vitrification solution for a period that varies with species, tissue and temperature [10]. For example, 60 min PVS2 treatment was optimal for cryopreserving embryonic axes of Parkia speciosa [9]. Moreover, protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium orchid [11] and Citrus madurensis embryonic axes [8] required shorter PVS exposure times at 25°C than 0°C, i.e. 20 versus 60 min respectively. Whilst the time window for optimum PVS treatment is wider at lower temperatures, tropical species tend to respond better with warmer temperature treatment, e.g. Colocasia esculenta [12].
The physical dimensions (geometry) and permeability characteristics of the tissue under investigation profoundly affect the outcome of the cryoprotection and cryopreservation procedures. Smaller apices (1.5 or 3 mm in diameter) of garlic displayed higher regeneration after cryopreservation than large ones (4.5 mm in diameter) [13]. Similarly, Nephelium ramboutan-ake shoot-tips of c. 2 mm tolerated cryopreservation well [14], as did 0.8 mm diameter axillary buds of Colocasia esculenta [12]. The cryopreservation of mature zygotic embryos of recalcitrant seeds generally requires a reduction in tissue mass to facilitate cryoprotectant uptake. Usually, this involves the excision of the embryonic axis. In axes of recalcitrant seeds of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) such surgical intervention results in a burst of superoxide (O2.−), with further oxidative stress during subsequent desiccation [15]. In this context, the free radical scavenging capability of CPs is additionally crucial for survival of cryopreservation procedures, assuming that the protectants permeate sufficiently. Permeation of chemicals into the intercellular spaces and cells of plant tissues is compounded by many features (e.g. mass, morphology, cellular anatomy and chemical composition). To enable the rapid permeation of the viability stain, triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), into oily tissues of pine seed, we previously used vacuum infiltration [16]. Similarly, this system has been used to improve efficient gene transformation [17], the delivery of pathogenic bacteria into the intercellular spaces of plants to study pathogen-plant cell interactions [18], [19] and the diffusion of an inhibitor of ethylene action so that pear fruits have prolonged storage [20]. In addition, preliminary studies have shown that vacuum-assisted glycerol cryoprotectant infiltration can preserve the normal histology of rat leg muscle with no ice crystal formation after 3 weeks storage at −80°C [21]. In this study, we developed and compared the efficacy of vacuum infiltration vitrification (VIV) using PVS2 for the cryopreservation of seed embryos of three species with varying morphology, stress physiology and chemistry: Carica papaya (Caricaceae); Passiflora edulis (Passifloraceae); and Laurus nobilis (Lauraceae).
These species have purported differences in seed storage characteristics. C. papaya has a high level of desiccation tolerance to about 5% moisture content [22], limited (months) storability at −20°C [23], but tolerance of cryopreservation [24]. P. edulis seeds may show reduced viability after drying to 5–6% moisture content, but the majority of dry seeds tolerate cryopreservation [24]. Both species have spatulate embryos in copious endosperm [25]. Finally, L. nobilis has seeds with a lowest safe moisture content of c. 24%, below which they are desiccation sensitive and successful moist storage at 0°C is limited to about 4 months [26]. L. nobilis embryos are linear and bigger (c. 5 mg dry mass) than both C. papaya and P. edulis. An unifying feature of these three species is that their seeds contain c. 25% oil. However, fatty acid composition varies greatly. Whilst L. nobilis seed has c. 50% saturated fat, mainly laurate (12∶0), C. papaya and P. edulis seeds are about 80% unsaturated fat with either oleic (18∶1) or linoleic (18∶2) as the main (c. 80%) fatty acid, respectively [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. Consequently, the thermal behavior of the lipids, and visco-elastic properties of the specimens, should vary between species and this has been correlated with poor dry seed storage performance at c. −20°C in some species, e.g. in an orchid [33] and a few Cuphea sp. [34]. Our primary objective in this study is to investigate whether vacuum infiltration vitrification (VIV)-cryopreservation is effective at preserving embryos of species from different provenances (i.e. Mediterranean to tropical), and with disparate morphology, chemistry and physiology. Given that seed desiccation sensitivity in plants correlates strongly with tropical moist forest habitats [35], in which the majority of the world’s plant species grow and which are under continuing threat of deforestation, resolving the ex situ conservation options for such species is an urgent imperative.
Materials and Methods
Seed Material
Both C. papaya and P. edulis fruits were purchased from a local supermarket and L. nobilis seeds were acquired from a commercial seed supplier. Seeds were extracted from the fruits and surface sterilised with 20% v/v commercial bleach (Domestos) for 10 min before rinsing three times with sterile water.
Seed and Embryo Desiccation
Seeds of all three species were desiccated to and equilibrated at various moisture contents ranging from c. 40 to 5% (fresh weigh basis) above lithium chloride salt solutions, at various levels of saturation, for up to 2 weeks. Germination was subsequently assessed as radicle emergence (≥2 mm) on 1% (w/v) agar-water. For L. nobilis, the embryos (excised and sterilized using the method described below) were also subjected to desiccation to various moisture contents by air drying in a laminar air flow cabinet and germinated in vitro in Petri dishes containing MS medium [36]. Seed germination and embryo growth in vitro was carried out at 25±2 °C in a temperature-controlled growth chamber with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod (50 µmol m−2 s−1).
Embryo Excision and Sterilization
The embryos were excised aseptically and rinsed with 3% (w/v) boric acid for 10 min followed by 1 min in 50% (v/v) ethanol and rinsed again with sterile water. For C. papaya the whole embryo was used for cryopreservation, whereas embryonic axes were used for P. edulis and L. nobilis following removal of the cotyledons by cutting the cotyledonary petiole above the shoot tip. Details of explant size/dimension used are summarised in Table 1.
Preculture Treatment
Prior to vitrification treatment, surface disinfected explants were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 0.75 M of sucrose for 1 day at 25±2 °C in a temperature-controlled growth chamber with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod (50 µmol m−2 s−1). Embryos at this stage served as controls for the vitrification and cryopreservation treatments.
Vitrification Treatment
The vitrification procedure consisted of dehydrating explants in a loading solution containing 2 M glycerol and 0.4 M sucrose for 20 min at 25 °C, followed by exposure to PVS2 [30% (w/v) glycerol, 15% (w/v) ethylene glycol, 15% (w/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.4 M sucrose] for different durations. For conventional vitrification (CV), explants were treated with PVS2 at 0 and 25°C for 0, 30, 60 and 90 min. For vacuum infiltration vitrification (VIV), the explants were incubated in PVS2 at 0 and 25°C for 0, 1, 2.5 and 5 min. The explants were immersed in 2 mL cryovials containing 1 mL of PVS2 solution in a vacuum chamber (10 L volume) and treated under vacuum (381 mm [15 in] of Hg) for the required period and the vacuum was then released.
Cryopreservation
Following vitrification treatment, the PVS2 solution was replaced with fresh PVS2 solution at the same temperature, the lid put on to the cryovial and the vial and explants plunged into liquid nitrogen. The explants were stored in liquid nitrogen for at least 24 h. Thereafter, the explants were rapidly warmed by placing the cryovials in a water bath at 38±2 °C for 2 min and then rehydrated for 20 min in liquid MS medium containing 1.2 M sucrose at room temperature.
Viability and Regrowth Assessments
The control, cryoprotected and cryopreserved explants were cultured on solid MS medium in a temperature-controlled growth chamber at 25±2 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod with light intensity of 50 µmol m−2 s−1. Explants were transferred to fresh culture medium every day for the first 3 days to reduce any residual toxicity of PVS2. The embryos were considered viable when they turned green, became swollen and started to elongate. The embryos were also assessed for regrowth into seedlings with the first pair of leaves and an extending radicle. Embryo vigour in vitro was assessed as the mean time to germinate (MTG) as evidenced by elongation (i.e. viability) in days;
, where
= number of embryos that have elongated at time
[37].
Thermal Analysis
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to characterise the thermal signature of the seed and embryo lipid and to investigate the presence of free water in the cryoprotected explants in relation to the vitrification potential of the embryos. A DSC 7 (Perkin-Elmer, UK), controlled by a TAC-7 and Pyris 7 software, was calibrated using indium, zinc and pure water as standards for peak temperature and enthalpy. Between 5 to 10 embryos, weighing between 25–35 mg, were placed in pre-weighed aluminium pans, non-hermetically sealed (as recommended for water and lipid phase change studies) with the aid of a Perkin Elmer crimper and weighed to record fresh weight values. Samples were cooled from 25 to −100°C and then rewarmed to 25°C at a cooling/warming rate of ±10°C min−1. Dry seeds and embryo/axes (as used in the cryopreservation experiments) with moisture contents ∼4% and without any CP treatment were also subjected to DSC analysis to compare seed and embryo lipid thermal behaviours using the same temperature programme, except for L. nobilis which was re-warmed to 50°C. The enthalpies for lipid melting endotherms, and where relevant the enthalpies for ice and PVS2 melting endotherms, were calculated using the Pyris 7 software. When lipid melting events overlapped with the ice or PVS2 melting, the enthalpy for lipid melt (calculated from dry embryos/axes) was subtracted from the total enthalpy to calculate residual melting events. PVS2 solution was also analysed in the DSC during cooling from 25 to −150°C and rewarming to 0°C at a rate of ±10°C min−1. All the thermal analyses were replicated three times.
Statistical Analysis
For each vitrification method, 120 embryos were used in three replicates of 40. The primary response was the percentage of viable (elongating) embryos/axes and the percentage of regrowing seedlings in vitro. These percentage values were transformed to logit values, and two-way ANOVA was used to test the level of significance. Means were compared using the Fisher-Pair Wise comparison test. Linear relations between embryo regrowth (%) and mean time for embryo viability (elongation) in vitro was assessed for all treatments in GENSTAT. A polynomial fit was used to define the optimal internal PVS2 concentration resulting in maximum post-cryopreservation regrowth using ORIGIN software. To ovoid skewing of the fit, zero values for survival due to ice crystallization and extreme toxicity were excluded.
Results
Seed and Axis Desiccation Tolerance
Seeds of C. papaya and P. edulis tolerated desiccation to around 4% moisture content, with germination falling slightly compared to undried material but remaining above 70% (Figure 1). On the contrary, desiccating L. nobilis seeds showed a steady decline in germination, with only 40% surviving after drying to 25% moisture content. Seeds lost viability completely by 15% moisture content. Aseptically excised and rapidly desiccated embryos of L. nobilis showed a similar trend in decreasing regrowth in vitro as the whole seed (Figure 1).
Legend: Germination percentage of C. papaya, P. edulis and L. nobilis seeds desiccated to various moisture contents and germinated on water agar. Also shown is the in vitro germination (regrowth) of L. nobilis embryos, following desiccation to various moisture contents, on MS medium at 25±2°C with a 16 h light/dark photoperiod.
Effects of Vitrification Method and Temperature
With the conventional vitrification (CV) method, embryos of C. papaya showed highest post-cryopreservation viability and regrowth (∼25%) with 30 min PVS2 treatment at 0°C (Figure 2A). Increasing the treatment time to 60 and 90 min resulted in lower regrowth of around 18% and no regrowth, respectively. In P. edulis axes, highest post-cryopreservation viability and regrowth ∼60% was recorded for 60 min PVS2 treatment (Figure 2B). For L. nobilis axes, following cryopreservation, highest viability (60%) and regrowth (52%) was achieved after 60 min PVS2 at 0°C (Figure 2C).
Legend: Viability and regrowth of C. papaya (A, D, G, J), P. edulis (B, E, H, K) and L. nobilis (C, F, I, L) embryos/embryonic axes before (−LN) and after (+LN) cryopreservation using conventional (A–F) and vacuum infiltration (G–L) vitrification at 0°C. Data are means (± SE). Within species, means with the same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05) using Fisher’s pair wise comparison.
In comparison with CV, the vacuum infiltration vitrification (VIV) method resulted in successful cryopreservation after exposure times to PVS2 about 10-times shorter. Post-cryopreservation viability and regrowth of C. papaya embryos increased significantly (p<0.05) to about 55% following 5 min VIV treatment at 0°C (Figure 2G). For the smaller embryonic axes of P. edulis, 1 min VIV treatment at 0°C was sufficient for good viability and regrowth (above 55%) following cryopreservation (Figure 2H). Increasing the PVS2 exposure period to 2.5 min increased the regrowth significantly to >63% but then decreased to 50% when the treatment time with PVS2 was extended to 5 min (Figure 2H). In L. nobilis, 50% regrowth after cryopreservation was recorded with 1 min VIV at 0°C; regrowth increased significantly (p<0.05) to 60 and 70% following 2.5 and 5 min treatments respectively (Figure 2I).
Because of the subtropical/tropical origin of two of the species, the effect of PVS2 treatment at room temperature was assessed. For C. papaya, CV treatment of embryos at 25°C was optimal after 30 min treatment, similar to the findings at 0°C (Figure 2D). However, highest regrowth was still only 20%. VIV for 5 min at 25°C resulted in the highest viability and regrowth (>40%) but regrowth was significantly lower than when applied at 0°C (55%) (Figure 2J). In P. edulis axes, 60 min PVS2 CV treatment at 25°C gave the highest viability and regrowth following cryopreservation (Figure 2E); however only 43% regrowth resulted, which was significantly lower (p<0.05) than the 0°C treatment (i.e., 53%). VIV treatment at 25°C for 2.5 min resulted in ∼50% viability and regrowth, but this was significantly (p<0.05) lower than the 60% achieved after 2.5 min exposure at 0°C and cryopreservation (Figure 2H, K). For L. nobilis axes, at 25°C, the highest regrowth following cryopreservation was ∼30% after the 60 min CV treatment which was ∼30% lower than that achieved at 0°C (Figure 2C, F). Whilst for this species VIV at 0°C and 25°C for 5 min were optimal, regrowth was significantly lower after the warm temperature treatment (Figure 2I, L).
Thermal Analysis of the Explants
Following PVS2 treatments, endotherms during warming were interpreted for different CV and VIV treatments, so that cryopreservation procedures could be optimised in relation to the presence/absence of freezable water and the permeation of PVS2. For all the species, there was a large ice melting peak observed in embryos not treated with PVS2 [e.g. for C. papaya (Figure 3)]. This peak was lost for C. papaya embryos, after 30, 60 and 90 min CV treatments at both temperatures, indicating freezable water had been removed from the embryos (Figure 3). However, whilst 60 and 90 min CV treatments avoided ice formation, the toxicity effect of the PVS2 was already evident in terms of reduced viability and regrowth (Figure 2A, D). For VIV at both temperatures, a small ice melting peak was observed for the 1 and 2.5 min treatments showing this exposure time was unlikely to achieve a vitrified state without any ice formation; consequently, regrowth was relatively low (Figure 2G, J). Extending the VIV treatment to 5 min resulted in no ice melting peak and the highest viability and regrowth following cryopreservation. For P. edulis axes, no ice melting was observed after all three exposure times for both CV and VIV at both temperatures. In the case of L. nobilis axes, 30 min CV treatment was insufficient to avoid the presence of an ice melt, but this was lost when 60 and 90 min exposure times were used at both temperatures. For VIV treatment, all three exposure times showed thermal profiles with no ice melting peak.
Legend: Representative DSC warming thermograms for C. papaya embryos untreated and treated with PVS2 under CV for 30, 60 and 90 min at 0°C showing ice melt (I), lipid melt (L), PVS2 melt (P) with melt enthalpies in brackets and PVS2 de-vitrification (Pdv). Samples were warmed from −100 to 25°C at 10°C min−1. Inset: Warming thermal profile of PVS2 solution with melt enthalpy in bracket (warming program: from −150 to 0°C at 10°C min−1).
The thermal profile of PVS2 solution during warming is presented as an inset in Figure 3. A glass transition (Tg) was observed at −115°C, followed by a devitrification (recrystallization) at around −75°C. The solution started to melt around −50°C with a midpoint of −37°C. The enthalpy of the PVS2 solution melt was 0.6 J g−1. The enthalpy of PVS2 melt in CV-treated C. papaya embryos increased from 0.23 to 0.41 and to 0.49 J g−1 as PVS2 treatment time was extended from 30 to 60 and to 90 min (Figure 3 inset). A polynomial fit for PVS2 melt enthalpy in explants and their regrowth revealed that the estimated optimum internal PVS2 was approximately 55 to 67% (0.33 to 0.4 J g−1 melting) for all three species (Figure 4A–C).
Legend: Regrowth following cryopreservation compared to internal concentration of PVS2 (defined by melt enthalpy using a DSC) of C. papaya (A), P. edulis (B) and L. nobilis (C) embryos/embryonic axes with a polynomial fit. (○ = CV at 0°C; • = CV at 25°C; Δ = VIV at 0°C; ▴ = VIV at 25°C).
As the visco-elastic properties of explants may affect cryoprotectant permeation and cryopreservation success, the thermal fingerprints for dry seeds and embryos were also characterised. Three prominent melting peaks were observed for C. papaya dry seeds and embryos at −45, −5 and 10°C indicating the embryos have relatively high lipid contents (Table 1; Figure 5A). Based on the published literature, the small melting peak at −45°C is consistent with linoleic acid (c. 3% of lipid in this species), and the combined peaks 2 and 3 at −10 to 10°C likely correspond to the presence of oleic acid (c. 65% of seed lipid). For the dry seed and embryonic axis of P. edulis, two main melts were observed at −45°C and −23°C, consistent with the presence of linoleic (74% of lipid) and oleic (17% of lipid) acids (Figure 5B). Several lipid melt peaks were evident for L. nobilis dry seed/axis (Figure 5C). Melting around 35°C was assigned to lauric acid (c. 38% of lipid). Other peaks, at −38°C and −15 to 15°C, correspond to the presence of linoleic (c. 40%) and oleic acids respectively. The results indicate potentially large differences in visco-elastic properties of the explants during the cryopreservation procedures at 0°C and 25°C.
Legend: DSC warming thermograms for C. papaya (A), P. edulis (B) and L. nobilis (C) dry seeds and embryos/embryonic axes showing lipid melt endotherms. Samples were cooled from 25°C to −100°C and rewarmed to 25°C (50°C for L. nobilis) at ±10°C min−1. Numbers on each peak indicating different lipid melt peaks corresponding to peaks in Table 1.
Embryo Vigour
In addition to recording embryo viability and regrowth percentages following cryopreservation, embryo vigour was assessed by measuring embryos/axes elongation (viability) in vitro over time. Linear relations were found for all three species between the percentage of embryo regrowth and the mean times for elongation (MTG) in days (Figure 6A–C). Accumulation of stress following PVS2 and cooling/warming treatments were very evident for C. papaya embryos; for both vitrification treatments, MTG increased from 7 days for the control to 8 days following cryoprotection and 14 days following cryopreservation for both treatment temperatures (Figure 6A). However, for P. edulis and L. nobilis axes, the MTG increased from c. 6 days (control) to c. 15 days following CV. In contrast, MTG remained at 8 days after VIV cryoprotection and cryopreservation, irrespective of treatment temperature, indicating the imposition of minimal stress by VIV (Figure 6B, C).
Legend: Mean time to germinate (MTG) based on embryo viability (elongation) compared to regrowth for C. papaya (A), P. edulis (B) and L. nobilis (C) showing relationship between seedling vigour and stress. (□ = control; ○ = CV at 0°C -LN; • = CV at 0°C +LN; Δ = CV at 25°C –LN; ▴ = CV at 25°C +LN; = VIV at 0°C -LN; ◊ = VIV at 0°C +LN;
= VIV at 25°C –LN;
= VIV at 25°C +LN). Numbers by each symbol represent: 1 = 30 min; 2 = 60 min; 3 = 90 min for CV; and 1 = 1 min; 2 = 2.5 min; 3 = 5 min for VIV respectively.
Discussion
The successful cryopreservation of seed embryos is determined by a complex interaction of factors that contribute to sample heterogeneity. These include structure (morphology and ultrastructure), cell physiology and stress (desiccation, cold) tolerance, and chemical composition and associated thermal properties, all of which impact on the optimisation of cryoprotection (permeation time and toxicity) and cryopreservation procedures (cooling/warming) [2], [9], [10], [38], [39].
Desiccation tolerance, as measured by seed germination and embryo recovery in vitro, varied for the three species studied. C. papaya tended to an orthodox response to drying, with 80% germination after desiccation to 5% moisture content and is in agreement with earlier findings [22], [40]. However, the seeds store poorly under conventional seed bank conditions (−20°C) and therefore cryopreservation is recommended for long-term seed/embryo storage [23], [24], [41], [42]. A similar level of drying tolerance was observed in P. edulis seeds, related species of which are also sensitive to dry, cold (−20°C) storage [43], [44]. In comparison, L. noblis seeds are highly sensitive to drying, with reduction of germination to 50% (LD50) at ∼30% moisture content (Figure 1). Whilst desiccation sensitivity in L. nobilis seeds has been noted previously [45], [46], [47], [48], and loss of viability within one year’s moist storage [26], our study is the first detailed characterisation of seed and embryo desiccation sensitivity for this species.
Variation in biophysical properties of the embryos was also evident for the three species, specifically in their lipid thermal fingerprints, as determined by DSC, the peak temperatures for which spanned 83°C [−45°C (onset) to 38°C (endpoint)]. In accordance with Hor et al. [39] and Hamilton et al. [49] who assigned particular thermal properties in oilseeds (and their embryos) to individual lipid/fatty acids in Citrus, melting peaks at −45°C in all three species is assigned here to linoleic acid: 3% of seed oils in C. papaya, 74% in P. edulis and 40% in L. nobilis [29], [50], [51]. For the three species, melting peaks between about −20 and 15°C occur as single or complex peaks (i.e. with shoulders) and have been assigned previously to oleic acid, e.g. in C. papaya [50] and L. nobilis [51]. Oleic acid is generally present in plants/seeds as a mono-unsaturated omega-9 fatty acid (18∶1 cis 9). However, this fatty acid is known to be susceptible to oxidation and to be less thermodynamically stable than the trans forms [52], perhaps explaining why we observed more than one peak in C. papaya and in L. nobilis. Finally, one of the main fatty acids in L. nobilis is lauric acid (38% of seed lipid; [53]) which we observed to melt at c. 35°C. This thermal response is similar to that seen in a number of Cuphea species that have high laurate and capric acid contents [54]. Consequently, seeds of these three species stored at any temperature from c. 38 to −45°C will be in different physical states, which may impact on their storage (in)stability [33], [34], [54] and also ensures variation in embryo visco-elastic properties during cryoprotection at the two pre-treatment temperatures used in this study.
The prepared explants (embryos and embryonic axes) of the three species differ in physical dimension, with L. nobilis axes being about 10 times heavier and larger than those of P. edulis. Consequently, a single treatment with cryoprotectant (e.g. time×temperature) is unlikely to result in an equal level of permeation and thus protection due to variable surface-area-to-volume ratios and diffusion path lengths. Often, PVS2 treatment of explants ≤0.5 mm diameter risks toxicity and explants ≥3 mm require much longer times for effective dehydration [55]. Our observation showed that for L. nobilis and P. edulis with large and small axes respectively, cryopreservation was maximal after 60 min CV PVS2 treatment at both 0 and 25°C. In comparison, whole C. papaya embryos, which are slightly larger than P. edulis axes, required a shorter PVS2 exposure time (i.e. 30 min). Overall the results show that tissue mass and volume are not the only determining factors for optimising PVS2 treatment duration. Possibly, not removing the spatulate cotyledons from C. papaya embryos may have enabled cryoprotectant permeation into the axis.
Maximal cryo-survival is presumed to coincide with an optimum internal concentration of cryoprotectant agent (CPA), which is generally not known for the sample under investigation, and the avoidance of ice formation in the tissues. According to our observation (Figure 3, inset) and Sakai et al. [56], PVS2 solution has a melting peak at ∼−36°C. For C. papaya, with little linoleic acid (∼3%) melting at −45°C, PVS2 melting during rewarming was evident as a small but distinct peak centred at −37°C (Figure 3). This peak was absent in control embryos (i.e. without PVS2 treatment). The enthalpy of the PVS2 melt in the embryos increased with treatment time (Figure 3). At the optimum PVS2 treatment time of 30 min for CV and 5 min for VIV, the enthalpies of the PVS2 melt in C. papaya embryos were approximated to 48% and 58% respectively of the maximal concentration, based on the total enthalpy of PVS2 solution (Figure 4A). Further increase in internal concentration of PVS2 to 75% of the signal intensity of full strength PVS2, as a result of extending the treatment to 90 min, resulted in no post-cryopreservation viability, presumably as a consequence of cytotoxic effects. Interestingly, C. papaya embryos showed some post-cryopreservation survival following 1 and 2.5 min VIV treatments even though the DSC thermograms indicated small ice melting peaks for these cryoprotected embryos. This was also the case for L. nobilis axes treated with 30 min CV. In these cases, water crystallisation may have occurred in non-critical tissues, e.g. extracellularly, or ice formation limited to those embryos that failed to tolerate cryopreservation, i.e. a population effect. A similar phenomenon of ice formation was observed in surviving shoot-tips of Parkia speciosa following encapsulation, 60 min PVS2 exposure and cryopreservation [9] and in Acer saccharinum embryonic axes [57].
When the average total lipid melting enthalpies of P. edulis and L. nobilis axes were accounted for, it was possible to assign the residual signal to PVS2 melting. For the embryos/axes of the three species, the average internal optimum PVS2 concentration for cryopreservation success is estimated to correspond to 55–67% of maximal concentration (i.e. on a J g−1 basis c.f. 0.6 J g−1 for PVS2 solution). Personalisation of vitrification solution concentrations to balance osmotic and toxicity effects has been recommended by Kim and Lee [58], on the basis of improved cryopreservation of plant cells using diluted PVS. For the three species tested here, 60% concentration of PVS2 is equivalent to a water potential around −31 MPa. This approximates to the water potentials at which recalcitrant seeds have lost all free (and thus freezable) water, i.e. −30 MPa [59], and close to the optimum for the cryopreservation of desiccation sensitive seeds of four citrus species, i.e. −38 MPa [39]. Consequently, it appears that for the successful cryopreservation of diverse embryos of various plant taxa a precise internal concentration of cryoprotectant, of c. 60% PVS2, may be required.
The uptake of CPAs in animal and human tissues is enhanced with increasing temperature; for example in rat kidney cortex and rat liver [60], medaka fish embryos [61] and human oocytes [62]. For DMSO, enhanced uptake at higher temperatures may be due to the progressive destabilization of the phospholipid bilayers [63], which increases the risk of toxicity [64], greater oxidation of sulfhydryl groups [65] and, in the presence of glycerol, the formation of formaldehyde by non-enzymatic reactions [65]. Nonetheless, in many tropical and sub-tropical plant species, regrowth is better after cryopreservation when PVS2 is applied at ambient temperature [55], as lower temperatures may cause chilling stress [8], [66]. In contrast, most woody, herbaceous temperate and some sub-tropical plant tissues tolerate PVS2 at 0°C [2], but optimum exposure times are longer compared to room temperature application, e.g. 20 min at 25°C and 60 min at 0°C for Citrus madurensis embryonic axes [8]. Whilst the optimum PVS2 treatment of 60 min resulted in similar viability after cool or warm application in C. papaya, P. edulis and L. nobilis responded better to cryoprotection under cool conditions, both in terms of viability and vigour. Thus, the embryos of the three species investigated are relatively chilling tolerant over the relatively short, optimum time intervals used in the CV study (≤1 h).
One question we sought to answer was whether a more uniform and faster permeation of PVS2 was possible, such that the obvious inter-species and tissue-specific variables of time×temperature×concentration effects could be reduced and cryo-survival increased. Vacuum degassing at 96 kPa has been used on seeds to enable faster permeation of the viability stain triphenyl tetrazolium chloride into whole pine seeds [16]. A weaker, ‘soft’ vacuum ( = 50 kPa) has also been used in gene transformation studies in one-week old tobacco seedlings [67]. We opted to use ‘soft’ vacuum for isolated embryos/axes, resulting in ∼10-fold reduction in optimum PVS2 exposure times to 2.5 or 5 min for the VIV approach, compared with 30–60 min for the CV method (Figure 2). Moreover, the overall regrowth level was higher and recovery growth was faster (Figure 6) following VIV-cryopreservation. Generally, increasing pressure enhances permeability of cells and tissues, e.g. K+ permeability into human red blood cells [68] and DMSO uptake into 8-cell medaka fish embryos [61]. However, plant tissues contain interconnected networks of intra-cellular (symplast) and inter-cellular (apoplast) spaces, the latter being air-filled at most times in live tissue [69], [70]. In detached roots of maize, the threshold pressure for infiltration of these spaces is about 40 kPa [71]. Over short exposure times we contend that the intercellular spaces could generate short-range thermodynamic disequilibration between the inside of the tissues and in the external solution by maintaining a (short-term) pressure difference (solute equilibrium pressure differential), as suggested on theoretical grounds by Elmoazzen et al. [72]. A vacuum environment would eliminate any pressure differential in the tissue, by removing air from the inter-cellular spaces, thus enabling tissues to expand rapidly with the inflow of CPA from the surrounding solution. For the embryos of the three species investigated, VIV permits successful cryopreservation after PVS2 treatments of a few minutes, and irrespective of the differing embryo morphologies (embryo vs axis, smaller vs larger). Indeed for the smallest embryo tissue used (axes of P. edulis), DSC showed that free water was removed from the tissues by 1 min VIV. Whilst a preliminary report has shown the preservation of normal histology of rat let muscle tissue after vacuum-assisted cryoprotectant infiltration [21], we believe our studies on three species provide the first report of fully functional tissue survival and regrowth after VIV-cryopreservation. There is an additional significance to this finding, as the VIV method may have overcome the further challenge of cryoprotectant permeation into oily, and thus relatively hydrophobic, embryos.
The restoration of tissue function is critical to successful cryo-conservation [73] with each step of the cryopreservation protocol having the potential to introduce stress: oxidative burst at embryo excision [15], shoot-tip damage by plasmolysing cryoprotection [74], cooling/warming and recovery procedures [9]. Ultimately, stress may be so great that only callus growth ensues after cryopreservation, e.g. embryos of some recalcitrant seeds [75]. Embryo regrowth in vitro after cryopreservation was observed in embryos/axes of all three species investigated (Figure 2) and speed of initiation of elongation (vigour) shown to be negatively related to regrowth level (Figure 6). The value of such an analysis of vigour is that the impact to viability of any single step in the cryopreservation protocol is observable as a continuum of stress effects across the population of samples.
In conclusion, VIV-cryopreservation has advantage over CV by shortening cryoprotectant treatment times to a few minutes, reducing the temperature dependency for cryoprotectant application and enabling higher post-cryopreservation regrowth (level and rate). Another advantage of this technology is the reduced risk of cross-contamination of specimens during liquid nitrogen storage compared to ultra-rapid cooling methods that bring the tissues into direct contact with the cryogen (e.g. the propelling of axes into cryogen slurry, droplet vitrification) as the specimens are enclosed in cryovials. As VIV-cryopreservation also overcomes the challenges of specimen heterogeneity (mass, volume, oil composition and thermal properties), the method shows considerable promise as the basis of a generic method for the preservation of various tissues of plant species.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JN HWP. Performed the experiments: JN. Analyzed the data: JN HWP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JN HWP. Wrote the paper: JN HWP.
References
- 1.
Reed BM (2008) Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide. New York: Springer.
- 2. Sakai A (2004) Plant cryopreservation. In: Florida: EE CRC Press Fuller BJ, Lane N, Benson EE, editors. Life In The Frozen State. LLC: 329–346.
- 3. Grout BWW, Shelton K, Pritchard HW (1983) Orthodox behaviour of oil palm seed and cryopreservation of the excised embryo for genetic conservation. Ann Bot 52: 381–384.
- 4. Taylor MJ, Song YC, Brockbank GM (2004) Vitrification in tissue preservation: new development. In: Florida: EE CRC Press Fuller BJ, Lane N, Benson EE, editors. Life In The Frozen State. LLC: 603–634.
- 5. Ogawa Y, Sakurai N, Oikawa A, Kai K, Morishita Y, et al. (2012) High-throughput cryopreservation of plant cell cultures for functional genomics. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 943–952.
- 6. Muldrew K, Acker JP, Elliott JAW, McGann LE (2004) The water to ice transition: implications for living cells. In: Florida: EE CRC Press Fuller BJ, Lane N, Benson EE, editors. Life In The Frozen State. LLC: 67–108.
- 7. Volk GM, Walters C (2006) Plant vitrification solution 2 lowers water content and alters freezing behavior in shoot tips during cryoprotection. Cryobiology 52: 48–61.
- 8. Cho EG, Hor YL, Kim HH, Rao VR, Engelmann F (2002) Cryopreservation of Citrus madurensis embryonic axes by vitrification: importance of loading and treatment with vitrification solution. CryoLetters 23: 317–324.
- 9. Nadarajan J, Mansor M, Krishnapillay B, Staines HJ, Benson EE, et al. (2008) Application of differential scanning calorimetry in developing cryopreservation strategies for Parkia speciosa, a tropical tree producing recalcitrant seeds. CryoLetters 29: 95–110.
- 10. Sakai A, Engelmann F (2007) Vitrification, encapsulation-vitrification and droplet-vitrification: a review. CryoLetters 28: 151–172.
- 11. Mohanty P, Das MC, Kumaria S, Tardon P (2012) High-efficiency cryopreservation of the medicinal orchid Denrobium nobile Lindl. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 109: 297–305.
- 12. Takagi H, Thinh NT, Islam OM, Senboku T, Sakai A (1997) Cryopreservation of in vitro-grown shoot tips of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) by vitrification. 1. Investigation of basic conditions of the vitrification procedure. Plant Cell Rep 16: 594–599.
- 13. Baek HJ, Kim HH, Cho EG, Chae YA, Engelmann F (2003) Importance of explant size and origin and of preconditioning treatments for cryopreservation of garlic shoot apices by vitrification. CryoLetters 24: 381–388.
- 14. Chua SP, Normah MN (2011) Effect of preculture, PVS2 and vitamin C on survival of recalcitrant Nephelium ramboutan-ake shoot tips after cryopreservation by vitrification. CryoLetters 32: 506–515.
- 15. Roach T, Ivanova M, Beckett R, Minibayeva FV, Green I, et al. (2008) An oxidative burst of superoxide in embryonic axes of recalcitrant sweet chestnut seeds as induced by excision and desiccation. Physiol Plant 133: 131–139.
- 16. Daws MI, Cousins C, Hall J, Wood CB (2006) Pressure - time dependency of vacuum degassing as a rapid method for viability assessment using tetrazolium chloride: a comparative study of 17 Pinus species. Seed Sci Technol 34: 475–489.
- 17. Ikram UH (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via vacuum infiltration. Plant Mol Biol Rep 22: 279–288.
- 18. Leelavathi S, Sunnichan VG, Mumria R, Vijaykanth GP, Bhatnagar RK, et al. (2004) A simple and rapid Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): embryogenic calli as a source to generate large number of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 22: 465–470.
- 19. Song G, Yamaguchi K (2003) Efficient agroinfiltration-mediated transient expression system of assaying different parameters in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 20: 235–239.
- 20. Chen S, Zhang M, Wang S (2012) Physiological and quality responses of Chinese ‘Suli’ pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd) to 1-MCP vacuum infiltration treatment. J Sci Food Agric 90: 1317–1322.
- 21. Kazutaka S, Katsumi S, Masaki T, Takashi Y, Taro K, et al. (2012) Preliminary report of novel technique for cryopreservation – vacuum-assisted cryoprotectant infiltration. Cryobiology 65: 21–26.
- 22. Wood CB, Pritchard HW, Amritphale D (2000) Desiccation-induced dormancy in papaya (Carica papaya L.) seeds is alleviated by heat shock. Seed Sci Res 10: 135–145.
- 23. Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1991) Effect of storage temperature and moisture on the germination of papaya seeds. Seed Sci Res 1: 69–72.
- 24. Becwar MR, Stanwood PC, Leonhardt KW (1983) Dehydration effects on freezing characteristics and survival in liquid nitrogen of desiccation-intolerant and desiccation-sensitive seeds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 108: 613–618.
- 25.
Mabberley DJ (1997) The Plant-Book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 874 pp.
- 26. Konstantinidou E, Takos I, Merou T (2008) Desiccation and storage behavior of bay laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) seeds. Eur J For Res 127: 125–131.
- 27. Beis SH, Dunford NT (2006) Supercritical fluid extraction of daphne (Laurus nobilis L.) seed oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 83: 953–957.
- 28. Litchfield C, Miller E, Harlow RD (1967) The triglyceride composition of 17 seed fats rich in octanoic, decanoic, or lauric acid. Lipids 2: 345–350.
- 29. Nyanzi SA, Carstensen B, Schwack W (2005) A comparative study of fatty acid profiles of Passiflora seed oils from Uganda. J Am Oil Chem Soc 82: 41–44.
- 30. Nguyen H, Tarandjiiska R (2006) Lipid classes, fatty acids and triglycerides in papaya seed oil. Lipids 97: 20–23.
- 31. Liu S, Yang F, Li J, Zhang C, Ji H, et al. (2008) Physical and chemical analysis of Passiflora seed and seed oil from China. Int J Food Sci Nutr 59: 706–715.
- 32. Sedat HB, Nurhan TD (2006) Supercritical fluid extraction of daphne (Laurus nobilis L.) seed oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 83: 953–957.
- 33. Pritchard HW, Seaton PT (1993) Orchid seed storage: historical perspective, current status, and future prospects for long-term conservation. Selbyana 14: 89–104.
- 34. Crane J, Miller AL, van Roekel JW, Walters C (2003) Triacylglycerols determine the unusual storage physiology of Cuphea seed. Planta 217: 699–708.
- 35. Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2003) Ecological aspects of seed desiccation sensitivity. J Ecol 91: 294–304.
- 36. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
- 37. Ranal MA, Santana DG, Ferreira WR, Rodrigues CM (2009) Calculating germination measurements and organising spreadsheets. Brazilian J Bot 32: 849–855.
- 38. Panis B, Piette B, Swennen R (2005) Droplet vitrification of apical meristems: a cryopreservation protocol applicable to all Musaceae. Plant Sci 168: 45–55.
- 39. Hor YL, Kim YJ, Ugap A, Chabrillange N, Sinniah UR, et al. (2005) Optimal hydration status for cryopreservation of intermediate oily seeds: Citrus as a case study. Ann Bot 95: 1153–1161.
- 40. Azimi M, O’Brien C, Ashmore S, Drew R (2005) Cryopreservation of papaya germplasm. Acta Hort 692: 43–50.
- 41. Chin HF, Krishnapillay B (1989) Cryogenic storage of some horticultural species. Acta Hort 253: 107–112.
- 42. Magil W, Deighton N, Pritchard HW, Benson EE, Goodman BA (1994) Physiological and biochemical studies of seed storage parameters in Carica papaya. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 102B: 439–442.
- 43.
Ospina JA, Guevara CL, Caicedo LE, Barney V (2000) Current research progress and application. In: Engelmann F, Takagi H, editors. Cryopreservation of Tropical Plant Germplasm. Rome: IPGRI. 378–381.
- 44. Gonzalez-Benito M, Aguilar N, Avila T (2009) Germination and embryo rescue from Passiflora species seeds post-cryopreservation. CryoLetters 30: 142–147.
- 45. Takos IA (2001) Seed dormancy in bay laurel (Laurus nobilis L.). New Forests 21: 105–114.
- 46. Takos IA, Konstantinidou E, Merou D (2002) The effect of desiccation on the seed germination of Laurus nobilis L. In: Thanos CA, Beardmore TL, Connor KF, Tolentino EL Jr., editors. Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of IUFRO. Chania, Crete, Greece, 11–15 Sept. 2002: 178–182.
- 47. Tilki F (2004) Influence of pretreatment and desiccation on the germination of Laurus nobilis L. seeds. J Environ Biol 25: 157–161.
- 48. Sari AO, Oguz B, Bilgc A (2006) Breaking seed dormancy of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.). New Forests 31: 403–408.
- 49. Hamilton KN, Ashmore SE, Pritchard HW (2009) Thermal analysis and cryopreservation of seeds of Australian wild Citrus species (Rutaceae): Citrus australasica, C. inodora and C. garrawayi. CryoLetters 30: 268–279.
- 50. Puangsri T, Abdulkarim SM, Ghazali HM (2005) Properties of Carica papaya L. (papaya) seed oil following extractions using solvent and enzymatic methods. J Food Lipids 12: 62–76.
- 51. Sari A (2003) Thermal reliability test of some fatty acids as PCMs used for solar thermal latent heat storage applications. Energ Convers Manage 44: 2277–2287.
- 52.
Rustan AC, Drevon CA (2005) Fatty Acids: Structures and Properties. London: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Nature Publishing, http://www.els.net.
- 53. Ozcan B, Esen M, Sangun MK, Coleri A, Caliskan M (2010) Effective antibacterial and antioxidant properties of methanolic extract of Laurus nobilis seed oil. J Environ Biol 31: 637–641.
- 54. Crane J, Kovach D, Gardner C, Walters C (2006) Triacylglycerol phase and 'intermediate' seed storage physiology: a study of Cuphea carthagenensis. Planta 223: 1081–1089.
- 55.
Sakai A, Hirai D, Niino T (2008) Development of PVS-Based vitrification protocol. In: Reed BM, editor. Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide. New York: Springer. 33–57.
- 56. Sakai A, Kobayashi S, Oiyama I (1990) Cryopreservation of nucellar cells of naval orange (Citrus sinensis Osb. var. brasiliensis Tanaka) by vitrification. Plant Cell Rep 9: 30–33.
- 57. Wesley-Smith J, Berjak P, Pammenter NW, Walters C (2014) Intracellular ice and cell survival in cryo-exposed embryonic axes of recalcitrant seeds of Acer saccharinum: an ultrastructural study of factors affecting cell and ice structures. Ann Bot 113: 695–709.
- 58. Kim HH, Lee SC (2012) Personalisation’ of droplet-vitrification protocols for plant cells: a systematic approach to optimising chemical and osmotic effects. CryoLetters 33: 271–279.
- 59. Pritchard HW (1991) Water potential and embryonic axis viability in recalcitrant seeds of Quercus rubra. Ann Bot 67: 43–49.
- 60. Isbell SA, Fyfe CA, Ammons RLM, Pearson B (1997) Measurement of cryoprotective solvent penetration into intact organ tissues using high-filed NMR microimaging. Cryobiology 35: 165–172.
- 61. Routray P, Suzuki TM, Strussmann CA, Takai R (2002) Factors affecting the uptake of DMSO by the eggs and embryos of medaka, Oryzias latipes. Theriogenology 58: 1483–1496.
- 62. Paynter SJ, Cooper A, Gregory L, Fuller BJ, Shaw RW (1999) Permeability characteristics of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulphoxide. Hum Reprod 14: 2338–2342.
- 63. Anchordoguy TJ, Carpenter JF, Crowe JH, Crowe LM (1992) Temperature dependent perturbation of phospholipid bilayers by dimethylsulphoxide. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembrane 1104: 117–122.
- 64. Sum AK, de Pablo JJ (2003) Molecular simulation study on the influence of dimethylsulfoxide on the structure of phospholipid bilayers. Biophys J 85: 3636–3645.
- 65. Karran G, Legge M (1996) Fertilization and early embryology: non-enzymatic formation of formaldehyde in mouse oocyte freezing mixtures. Hum Reprod 11: 2681–2686.
- 66. Tiau KH, Rathinam X, Chan LK, Subramaniam S (2009) An assessment of early factors influencing the PVS2 vitrification method using protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium Sonia 28. American-Eurasian J Sust Agric 3: 280–289.
- 67. Escudero J, Dulk-Ras A, Regensburg-Tuink TJG, Hooykaas PJJ (2003) VirD4-independent transformation by CloDF13 evidences an unknown factor required for the genetic colonization of plants via Agrobacterium. Mol Microbiol 47: 891–901.
- 68. Hall AC, Ellory JC, Klein RA (1982) Pressure and temperature effects on human red cell cation transport. J Membr Biol 68: 47–56.
- 69. Woolley JT (1983) Maintenance of air in intercellular spaces in plants. J Plant Physiol 72: 989–991.
- 70.
Beck CB (2009) An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development: Plant Anatomy for the Twenty-First Century, Edition 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 431 pp.
- 71. Michael W, Cholodova VP, Ehwald R (1999) Gas and liquids in intercellular spaces of maize roots. Ann Bot 84: 665–673.
- 72. Elmoazzen HY, Elliott JAW, McGann LE (2005) Cryoprotectant equilibration in tissues. Cryobiology 51: 85–91.
- 73. Fang JY, Wetten A (2011) Importance of structural integrity of somatic embryos for long-term cryopreservation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) germplasm. African J Agric Res 6: 3954–3961.
- 74. Volk GM, Caspersen AM (2007) Plasmolysis and recovery of different cell types in cryoprotected shoot tips of Mentha x piperita. Protoplasma 231: 215–226.
- 75. Pritchard HW, Prendergast FG (1986) Effects of desiccation and cryopreservation on the in vitro viability of embryos of the recalcitrant seed species Araucaria hunsteinii K. Schum. J Exp Bot 37: 1388–1397.