Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prenatal Organophosphates Exposure Alternates the Cleavage Plane Orientation of Apical Neural Progenitor in Developing Neocortex

  • Xiao-Ping Chen ,

    chxp@zjut.edu.cn

    Affiliation College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

  • Wei-Feng Chen,

    Affiliation College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

  • Da-Wei Wang

    Affiliation College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

Prenatal organophosphate exposure elicits long-term brain cytoarchitecture and cognitive function impairments, but the mechanism underlying the onset and development of neural progenitors remain largely unclear. Using precise positioned brain slices, we observed an alternated cleavage plane bias that emerged in the mitotic neural progenitors of embryonal neocortex with diazinion (DZN) and chlorpyrifos (CPF) pretreatment. In comparison with the control, DZN and CPF treatment induced decrease of vertical orientation, increase of oblique orientation, and increase of horizontal orientation. That is, the cleavage plane orientation bias had been rotated from vertical to horizontal after DZN and CPF treatment. Meanwhile, general morphology and mitotic index of the progenitors were unchanged. Acephate (ACP), another common organophosphate, had no significant effects on the cleavage plane orientation, cell morphology and mitotic index. These results represent direct evidence for the toxicity mechanism in onset multiplication of neural progenitors.

Introduction

Developmental brain exposure to organophosphorus pesticides disturbs the neurogenesis procession and leaves long-term brain cytoarchitecture deficits and cognitive function impairments in adult animals [1], [2], [3], [4]. Such neurotoxicity can be induced by a variety of mechanisms, including selective inactivation of critical metabolic enzymes [5], [6], damage of chromosome of neural progenitors [7], [8], [9], [10], and disorder of content and turnover of neurotransmitters [11], [12]. For example, neuritic outgrowth in developing brain is impaired by chlorpyrifos (CPF) or diazinon (DZN) exposure with inhibition of choline acetyltransferase activity [13], nuclear condensation in oligodendrocyte progenitors is elicited by CPF co-incubation with increase of caspase 3/7 activity and heme oxygenase-1 expression [9], and depression behaviors in CPF-pretreated animals are dependence on abnormalities of serotonergic system [14]. Interest, early-prenatal CPF exposure or late-prenatal CPF exposure induce distinct reaction patterns of dopamine content in offspring brain regions, and equivalent neonatal CPF exposure causes distinct cytoarchitecture dysmorphogenesis in the striatum, somatosensory cortex and septal nucleus. Thus, the organophosphate-elicited neurotoxicity is developmental stages selective and brain regions selective [15], [16].

Previous evidences suggest that the selective brain region abnormalities are caused by the selective neurotoxicity effects on the proliferation and differentiation procession of neural progenitors. For example, inhibition effect of DNA synthesis in CPF treated C6 cells at the undifferentiated stage is much higher than that at the differentiated stage [17]. CPF or chlorpyrifos oxon (CPO) inhibits the axon outgrowth but enhances the dendrite growth in the superior cervical ganglia neuron [18]. CPF targets PC 12 cells to differentiate into the catecholaminergic phenotype, but inhibits the cells to differentiate into the cholinergic phenotype [19]. Moreover, in vivo studies showed that CPF-induced neurotoxicity affects gliotype cells to a greater extent than neuronotypic cells, with the maximum effects at the peak period of gliogenesis and glial cell differentiation [20]. However, there still lack of evidence that whether the toxicity involve the onset multiplication of neural progenitors.

Apical progenitors (APs) are the neurogenesis onset cells which locate at the apical surface of ventricular zone in embryo neocortex. APs perform two types of division: symmetric division for self-renew and asymmetric division for differentiation, which direct the two developmental fates in a single division [21], [22]. Cleavage plane orientation, the physical barrier of plasma contents, directs symmetric or asymmetric distribution of fate determinants in daughter cells and represents a hallmark of division types in APs [23], [24].

This study was designed to elucidate the direct effects of organophosphates on the cleavage plane orientation of neural progenitors. CPF, DZN and acephate (ACP), three common organophosphates, were treated in subtoxic dosages to the dams during E7.5–11.5, the cleavage plane orientations and the general morphology were measured at E16 in offspring neocortex APs. Our studies represent new exploration in the division procession of neural progenitor toxicity.

Results

Effects of Three Pesticides on General Cytoarchitecture of Apical Progenitors

To examine the basic toxicity of three pesticides at the defined dosages, we first observed the general cytoarchitecture of APs on E16 neocortex slices. Apical progenitors at E16 were long and slender cells, radial arranged along the ventricular margin with closely packed nuclei (Fig. 1A). After pretreated with DZN, CPF and ACP during 7.5–11.5, the general cytoarchitecture of E16 APs had no obvious changes. The cells arranged in smooth line, the nuclei packed as the same density as in the control group, the intercellular spaces were in the normal range, and pathological changes like apoptosis bodies or vacuolus were not found in the APs cytoplasm (Fig. 1B, C, D).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Effects of three pesticides on architecture of apical surface in E16 neocortex.

Images of apical progenitors in E16 neocortex pretreated with diazinon (DZN, 2 mg/kg), chlorpyrifos (CPF, 2 mg/kg) or acephate (ACP, 50 mg/kg). The progenitors arranged radially along the ventricular margin with closely packed nuclei. Scale bar: 20 µM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095343.g001

Effects of Three Pesticides on Mitotic Index of Apical Progenitors

To evaluate the effects of three pesticides on APs division procession, we determined the cell number in the APs with mitotic figures. More than 2000–3000 of cells was counted for each group, and the percentage of mitotic cells and mitotic index in all APs was calculated. Similar to previous studies [25], [26], mitotic index was 32.4±3.11% for control group. Respectively, mitotic index in DZN, CPF and ACP groups was 33.4±4.51%, 33.0±2.75%, and 33.2±3.01%. There was no statistics significance in all groups (P>0.05). (Fig. 2).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Effects of three pesticides on mitotic index of apical progenitors in E16 neocortex.

Apical progenitors with mitotic figures were counted in three pesticides and control group, mitotic index was defined as the mitotic cell number/total cell number. More than 2000–3000 of cells was counted for each group. Data are represent as Mean ± SEM. N = 7 embryos from individual dams. No significance was observed at each group (P>0.05). Diazinon: DZN; Chlorpyrifos: CPF; Acephate: ACP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095343.g002

Effects of Three Pesticides on Cleavage Plane of Apical Progenitors

Cleavage plane orientation was then been determined in E16 APs. Control group displayed 79.4±1.06% of vertical orientation, 14.7±0.73% of oblique orientation, and 5.4±0.53% of horizontal orientation. Respectively, the orientation index of DZN group and CPF group was 74.0±1.15% and 72.7±0.76% of vertical orientation, 17.8±0.94% and 21.4±1.12% of oblique orientation, 8.0±0.65% and 5.6±0.59% of horizontal orientation. Comparing to the control, there was significant decrease in vertical orientation of DZN and CPF group (P<0.05 and P<0.01), significant increase in oblique orientation of DZN and CPF group (P<0.05 and P<0.01), and significant increase in horizontal orientation of DZN group (P<0.01). These results indicated that DZN and CPF pretreatment rotate the orientation bias of APs from vertical to horizontal.

In contrast, ACP pretreatment showed no significant effects on APs cleavage plane. There was 77.6±2.52% of vertical orientation, 16.6±0.73% of oblique orientation, and 5.7±0.57% of horizontal orientation in ACP group. No significant difference was found in all orientations comparing to the control group (P>0.05) (Fig. 3).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Effects of three pesticides on cleavage plane of apical progenitors in E16 neocortex.

Cleavage plane orientation of apical progenitors was determined by measuring the angle of cleavage plane to the ventricle surface. Only cells in metaphase and anaphase phase were counted. Mitotic cells were divided into three types according the angle of cleavage plane plane: vertical (60–90°), oblique (30–60°), and horizontal (0–30°). (A) Effects of three pesticides on vertical orientation; (B) Effects of three pesticides on oblique orientation; (C) Effects of three pesticides on horizontal orientation. Data are represent as Mean ± SEM. N = 7 embryos from individual dams. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 for pesticides vs. control. Diazinon: DZN; Chlorpyrifos: CPF; Acephate: ACP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095343.g003

Discussion

The occurrence and maintenance of the pesticides elicited neurotoxicity involve a variety of mechanism in proliferation and differentiation regulation at neural progenitors. In this study, we have performed a new research at the procession of cellular division, focusing on the morphology characteristics of the spindle mitotic figure.

There are three essential findings in our study. First, vertical cleavage plane could be decreased by two of three pesticides pretreatment, while oblique and horizontal cleavage plane could be increased in the meantime; Second, DZN and CPF exposure did not decrease the APs mitotic cells number; Finally, the two pesticides exposure at the defined dosages did not cause apoptosis and vacuolar degeneration of the progenitors. These results represented the cleavage plane abnormalities when no obvious basic pathology changes were observed in pesticides pretreated neural progenitors.

Roy et al [27] first reported the unnatural horizontal mitotic figures which usually not existing in E11.5 neuroepithelium, when incubating of E9.5 embryo of rat for 48 hrs in 0.5–50 µg/ml CPF solution. The abnormalities of cleavage plane were observed associated with the cell shrinkage and apoptosis. Prendergast et al [28] showed that pesticides treatment make propidium iodide incorporated into the progenitors spindle structure. These results suggest that organophosphorus pesticides have potent to direct impair the mitotic spindle and elicit division abnormalities. However, our data showed that altered cleavage plane orientation arise at the pesticides dosages without basic morphological abnormalities, which indicate the mitotic figure abnormalities as an early and sensitive hallmark of pesticides neurotoxicity.

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is commonly considered as the primary target of organophosphorus pesticides, which catabolyze neurotransmitter acetylcholine and play critical functions in cholinergic synaptic transmission [29]. Erythrocyte AChE activity is traditional toxicity endpoint of organophosphorus pesticides and standard point to establish the safety application doses [30]. Previously studies showed that CPF or DZN revealed developmental neurotoxicity at dose above the threshold of AChE inhibition, however, application of muscarinic receptors or nicotinic receptor antagonists showed little effect on the toxicity, indicating independent mechanism from the cholinergic functions [13], [29].

Several evidences suggested that the cleavage plane orientation may be determined by microtubules rearranged mechanism, for example, α-and β- tubulin dimmer assembling, microtubule associated protein bundling, and kinesin motor proteins driving [31], [32]. It was proved that microtubules polymerization can be disrupted by CPF and chlorpyrifos oxon (CPO) exposure, when covalently modified at the tyrosine sites of purified bovine tubulin and MAP-rich tubulin [33], [34]. Reduced MAP-2 immunoreactivity and injured pyramidal cells were found in cultured organotypic slices of hippocampus with CPO exposure [28]. Finally, in vitro experiments showed CPF and CPO exposure inhibit the microtubulin mobility directed by molecule motor kinesin [35]. Thus, microtubule mechanism may involve in the pesticide-induced mitotic figure abnormalites.

Materials and Methods

Animal and Treatment

ICR mice, weight of 28∼32 g and aged at 8–10 weeks, were purchased from the experimental animal centre in Zhejiang province. Male and female couples were housed in breeding cages with free access to food and water and a 12/12 dark-light cycle. Vaginal plugs were checked twice a day at 9∶00 am and 9∶00 pm to determine the exact time of embryo day 0 (E0). All the experimental procedures were conducted with the approval by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the Research Center of Laboratory Animal Science of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University(Permit Number are SYXK (Zhe) 2008-0116) and carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory animals issued by the National Institutes of Health.

The pregnant female mice were randomly classified into four groups with seven dams for each treatment group. Chlorpyrifos (CPF, 99.1% purity) was obtained from Xinnong Chemical Company, Zhejiang. Diazizon (DZN, 98.3% purity) and acephate (ACP, 97% purity) were purchased from Sigma Company. CPF, DZN and ACP were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at concentrations of 1 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml and 25 mg/ml. From E7.5 to E11.5, dams were received daily subcutaneous injections of 2 mg/kg.bw DZN, 2 mg/kg.bw CPF and 50 mg/kg.bw ACP, while the control group was injected with an equal volume of dimethyl sulfoxide (volume range from 0.056 ml to 0.064 ml according to the maternal body weight).

Tissue Fixation and Histochemistry

On E16, dams were sacrificed, embryo brains were isolated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hour. After dehydrated with gradients alcohol and cleared with xylene, the samples were embedded in paraffin. The wax block was adjusted to take a precise coronary orientation, then cut into continuous 4-µm sections. The sections were de-crumpled in 45°C water and put onto glass slices. The slices were dried in 65°C over night, de-paraffinized with gradients alcohol, cleared with xylene, then stained with hematoxylin for 15 min and counterstained with eosin for 30 sec.

Cytoarchitecture

Maximum cross-section of lateral ventricle was used as the hallmark to maintain the slices at same level. Cytoarchitecture of apical surface of E16 neocortex ventricle wall was observed and distinguished under Olympus IX71 microscope. Apical progenitors were defined as the cells lying along the surface of ventricular zone. General cell morphology was observed under high magnification, and mitotic index is defined as the mitotic cell number/total cell number.

To reduce any individual differences in groups, all the results are performed in a double-blind way. Seven slices in each group was taken from seven different embryos with individual dams.

Cleavage Plane Orientation

Mitotic figures in apical surface of ventricular zone were recognized and analyzed. Cleavage plane orientation was determined by measuring the angle of cleavage plane to the ventricle surface. Only cells in metaphase and anaphase phase were counted. Mitotic cells were divided into three types according the angle of cleavage plane plane: horizontal (0–30°), oblique (30–60°), and vertical (60–90°). Each type of orientation was counted separately and calculated as the ratio of total counted mitotic cells.

Data Analysis

Data are presented as means plus standard error (Mean ± SEM). SPSS 17.0 software was used to analysis treatment and control groups with single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA, one-way analysis of variance). Significance was conducted and expressed as P<0.05 and P<0.01.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XCh WCh. Performed the experiments: WCh DW. Analyzed the data: WCh XCh DW. Wrote the paper: XCh DW.

References

  1. 1. Chen XP, Chen WZ, Wang FS, Liu JX (2012) Selective cognitive impairments are related to selective hippocampus and prefrontal cortex deficits after prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure. Brain Res 1474: 19–28.
  2. 2. Icenogle LM, Christopher NC, Blackwelder WP, Caldwell DP, Qiao D, et al. (2004) Behavioral alterations in adolescent and adult rats caused by a brief subtoxic exposure to chlorpyrifos during neurulation. Neurotoxicol and Teratol 26: 95–101.
  3. 3. Levin ED, Addy N, Baruah A, Elias A, Christopher NC, et al. (2002) Prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure in rats causes persistent behavioral alterations. Neurotoxicol and Teratol 24: 733–741.
  4. 4. Rauh VA, Perera FP, Horton MK, Whyatt RM, Bansal R, et al. (2012) Brain anomalies in children exposed prenatally to a common organophosphate pesticide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 7871–7876.
  5. 5. Rush T, Liu XQ, Hjelmhaug J, Lobner D (2010) Mechanisms of chlorpyrifos and diazinon induced neurotoxicity in cortical culture. Neuroscience 166: 899–906.
  6. 6. Zurich MG, Honegger P, Schilter B, Costa LG, Monnet-Tschudi F (2004) Involvement of glial cells in the neurotoxicity of parathion and chlorpyrifos. Toxicol and Appl Pharmacol 201: 97–104.
  7. 7. Caughlan A, Newhouse K, Namgung UK, Xia Z (2004) Chlorpyrifos induces apoptosis in rat cortical neurons that is regulated by a balance between p38 and ERK/JNK MAP kinases. Toxicol Sci 78: 125–134.
  8. 8. Mense SM, Sengupta A, Lan C, Zhou M, Bentsman G, et al. (2006) The common insecticides cyfluthrin and chlorpyrifos alter the expression of a subset of genes with diverse functions in primary human astrocytes. Toxicol Sci 93: 125–135.
  9. 9. Saulsbury MD, Heyliger SO, Wang K, Johnson DJ (2009) Chlorpyrifos induces oxidative stress in oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Toxicology 259: 1–9.
  10. 10. Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ (2010) Oxidative stress from diverse developmentalneurotoxicants: Antioxidants protect against lipid peroxidation without preventing cell loss. Neurotoxicol and Teratol 32: 124–131.
  11. 11. Karanth S, Liu J, Mirajkar N, Pope C (2006) Effects of acute chlorpyrifos exposure on in vivo acetylcholine accumulation in rat striatum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 216: 150–156.
  12. 12. Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ (2007) Prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure elicits presynaptic serotonergic and dopaminergic hyperactivity at adolescence: critical periods for regional and sex-selective effects. Reprod Toxicol 23: 421–427.
  13. 13. Slotkin TA, Levin ED, Seidler FJ (2006) Comparative developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphate insecticides: effects on brain development are separable from systemic toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 114: 746–751.
  14. 14. Aldridge JE, Levin ED, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA (2005) Developmental exposure of rats to chlorpyrifos leads to behavioral alterations in adulthood, involving serotonergic mechanisms and resembling animal models of depression. Environ Health Perspect 113: 527–531.
  15. 15. Chen XP, Wang X, Dong JY (2011) Different reaction patterns of dopamine content to prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos in different periods. J Appl Toxicol 31: 355–359.
  16. 16. Roy TS, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA (2004) Morphologic effects of subtoxic neonatal chlorpyrifos exposure in developing rat brain: regionally selective alterations in neurons and glia. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 148: 197–206.
  17. 17. Garcia SJ, Seidler FJ, Crumpton TL, Slotkin TA (2001) Does the developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos involve glial targets? Macromolecule synthesis, adenylyl cyclase signaling, nuclear transcription factors, and formation of reactive oxygen in C6 glioma cells. Brain Res 891: 54–68.
  18. 18. Howard AS, Bucelli R, Jett DA, Bruun D, Yang D, et al. (2005) Chlorpyrifos exerts opposing effects on axonal and dendritic growth in primary neuronal cultures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207: 112–124.
  19. 19. Jameson RR, Seidler FJ, Qiao D, Slotkin TA (2006) Chlorpyrifos affects phenotypic outcomes in a model of mammalian neurodevelopment: critical stages targeting differentiation in PC12 cells. Environ Health Perspect 114: 667–672.
  20. 20. Garcia SJ, Seidler FJ, Qiao D, Slotkin TA (2002) Chlorpyrifos targets developing glia: effects on glial fibrillary acidic protein. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 133: 151–161.
  21. 21. Attardo A, Calegari F, Haubensak W, Wilsch-Brauninger M, Huttner WB (2008) Live imaging at the onset of cortical neurogenesis reveals differential appearance of the neuronal phenotype in apical versus basal progenitor progeny. PLoS One 3: e2388.
  22. 22. Siller KH, Doe CQ (2009) Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat Cell Biol 11: 365–374.
  23. 23. Haydar TF, Ang Jr E, Rakic P (2003) Mitotic spindle rotation and mode of cell division in the developing telencephalon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 2890–2895.
  24. 24. Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA (2012) Spindle orientation in mammalian cerebral cortical. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 737–746.
  25. 25. Miyata T, Kawaguchi A, Saito K, Kawano M, Muto T, et al. (2004) Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells. Development 131: 3133–3145.
  26. 26. Smart IHM (1973) Proliferative characteristics of the ependymal layer during the early development of the mouse neocortex: a pilot study based on recording the number, location and plane of cleavage of mitotic figures. J Anat 116: 67–91.
  27. 27. Roy TS, Andrews JE, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA (1998) Chlorpyrifos elicits mitotic abnormalities and apoptosis in neuroepithelium of cultured rat embryos. Teratology 58: 62–68.
  28. 28. Prendergast MA, Self RL, Smith KJ, Ghayoumi L, Mullins MM, et al. (2007) Microtubule-associated targets in chlorpyrifos oxon hippocampal neurotoxicity. Neuroscience 146: 330–339.
  29. 29. Eaton DL, Daroff RB, Autrup H, Bridges J, Buffler P, et al. (2008) Review of the toxicology of chlorpyrifos with an emphasis on human exposure and neurodevelopment. Crit Rev Toxicol S2: 1–125.
  30. 30. Colborn T (2006) A case for revisiting the safety of pesticides: A closer look at neurodevelopment. Environ Health Perspect 114: 10–17.
  31. 31. Glotzer M (2009) The 3Ms of central spindle assembly: microtubules, motors and MAPs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 9–20.
  32. 32. Yingling J, Youn YH, Darling D, Toyo-oka K, Pramparo T, et al. (2008) Neuroepithelial stem cell proliferation requires LIS1 for precise spindle orientation and symmetric division. Cell 132: 474–486.
  33. 33. Grigoryan H, Lockridge O (2009) Nanoimages show disruption of tubulin polymerization by chlorpyrifos oxon: Implications for neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 240: 143–148.
  34. 34. Jiang W, Duysen EG, Hansen H, Shlyakhtenko L, Schopfer LM, et al. (2010) Mice treated with chlorpyrifos or chlorpyrifos oxon have organophosphorylated tubulin in the brain and disrupted microtubule structures, suggesting a role for tubulin in neurotoxicity associated with exposure to organophosphorus agents. Toxicol Sci 115: 183–193.
  35. 35. Gearhart DA, Sickles DW, Buccafusco JJ, Prendergast MA, Terry AJ (2007) Chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-oxon, and diisopropylfluorophosphate inhibit kinesin-dependent microtubule motility. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 218: 20–29.