Figures
Abstract
Background
Biological activated sludge process must be functionally stable to continuously remove contaminants while relying upon the activity of complex microbial communities. However the dynamics of these communities are as yet poorly understood. A macroecology metric used to quantify community dynamic is the taxa-time relationship (TTR). Although the TTR of animal and plant species has been well documented, knowledge is still lacking in regard to TTR of microbial communities in activated sludge bioreactors.
Aims
1) To characterize the temporal dynamics of bacterial taxa in activated sludge from two bioreactors of different scale and investigate factors affecting such dynamics; 2) to evaluate the TTRs of activated sludge microbial communities in two bioreactors of different scale.
Methods
Temporal variation of bacterial taxa in activated sludge collected from a full- and lab-scale activated sludge bioreactor was monitored over a one-year period using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes. TTR was employed to quantify the bacterial taxa shifts based on the power law equation S = cTw.
Results
The power law exponent w for the full-scale bioreactor was 0.43 (R2 = 0.970), which is lower than that of the lab-scale bioreactor (w = 0.55, R2 = 0.971). The exponents for the dominant phyla were generally higher than that of the rare phyla. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) result showed that the bacterial community variance was significantly associated with water temperature, influent (biochemical oxygen demand) BOD, bioreactor scale and dissolved oxygen (DO). Variance partitioning analyses suggested that wastewater characteristics had the greatest contribution to the bacterial community variance, explaining 20.3% of the variance of bacterial communities independently, followed by operational parameters (19.9%) and bioreactor scale (3.6%).
Citation: Hai R, Wang Y, Wang X, Li Y, Du Z (2014) Bacterial Community Dynamics and Taxa-Time Relationships within Two Activated Sludge Bioreactors. PLoS ONE 9(3): e90175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090175
Editor: Julio Vera, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Received: October 27, 2013; Accepted: January 27, 2014; Published: March 4, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Hai et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZY1306) and special fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (3K06ESPCT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Biological activated sludge process is the most widely used biological process to treat municipal and industrial wastewater. The efficient and stable operation of biological wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) relies upon the relative abundance or activity of these microbial populations within it [1]. Because variations in microbial community composition are often associated with changes in the functional capabilities of those communities, understanding microbial temporal patterns of activated sludge can be critical for understanding ecosystem processes, and then to enhance the treatment performance and stability [2], [3].
In recent years, a growing collection of studies in the microbial ecology of activated sludge suggests that microbial communities of activated sludge exhibit a wide range of discernible temporal patterns, particularly within specific microbial subpopulations such as nitrifiers [4], [5], denitrifiers [6], phosphorus-accumulating organisms [7], and methanogens [8]. Such temporal variations in microbial communities are thought to be influenced by the deterministic environmental and operational variables and/or stochastic factors [9]–[11]. By contrast, in a full-scale WWTP, Kim et al. [12] found that some microbial communities were composed of core members that exhibit minimal temporal variability and rarer taxa that exhibit more pronounced fluctuations in abundance over time. Further, some microbial communities have the capacity to recover quickly after disturbance events, either to the pre-disturbance state or to an alternative stable state [13], [14]. Overall, these and other time series highlight that microbial communities are dynamic and exhibit temporal patterns that can reflect underlying biotic and abiotic processes.
Many previous studies have been performed in lab-scale bioreactors which treated synthetic wastewater, where selective pressures likely differ dramatically from those in full-scale plants [10]. An equilibrium model based on island biogeography also predicts that the scale of bioreactors affect microbial communities within them [3]. Indeed, a very limited number of studies have characterized microbial population dynamics in activated sludge from full-scale WWTPs. To data, there is no quantitative comparison of the change rate of microbial population within activated sludge from different scale bioreactors. Furthermore, nearly all of the previous studies employed clone library or fingerprinting methods to characterize the temporal dynamics of microbial communities in bioreactors. These techniques are lack of ability to detect rare species within a given habitat. For example, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) exhibits method-dependent detection threshold in absolute abundance and it has been estimated that populations for <103 individuals per sample within a given community will be below the detection threshold [11], [15]. Fortunately, the ongoing development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has made it feasible to describe the temporal dynamics of microbial communities in higher resolutions that were previously unattainable [16].
Activated sludge bioreactors are excellent test beds for fundamental questions in microbial ecology [5]. One of the fundamental objectives of ecology is to understand how biodiversity is generated and maintained across spatial and temporal scales [11], [16]. Patterns of species diversity provide important insights into the underlying mechanisms that regulate biodiversity, and are central to the development of ecological models and theories. One such pattern is the species-area relationship (SAR), which describes the tendency that species richness increases with area. SAR plays a central role in biodiversity research, and recent work has increased awareness of its temporal analogue, the species-time relationship (herein referred to as the taxa-time relationship [TTR]) [17]. The TTR describes how the species richness of a community increases with the time span over which the community is observed [18]. It is similar in form to the SAR: S = cTw, where S is the taxa richness, T is the time of observation, c is an empirically derived constant, and w is a scaling exponent that reflects species turnover [10]. Although the TTR of animal and plant species has been well documented [18], it is only recently that TTRs have been tested in a limited number of microbial systems [10], [16], [19]. To data, very few studies have applied the power-law TTR to activated sludge bioreactors, and they found that the accumulation of observed taxa within the bioreactor followed a power law relationship [10], [11]. However, Comparisons of the temporal scaling exponent (w) among various microbial populations and between bioreactors at different scale have not yet been explored.
The primary objectives of this study were thus two-fold: 1) to characterize the temporal dynamics of bacterial taxa in activated sludge from two bioreactors of different scale and investigate factors affecting such dynamics; and 2) to evaluate the TTRs of activated sludge microbial communities in two bioreactors of different scale, and compare the temporal scaling exponent w among different microbial populations within the two bioreactors.
Materials and Methods
Sample collection and site description
In this study, activated sludge samples were collected from two bioreactors of different scale: one is a full-scale wastewater treatment system and the other is a lab-scale bioreactor which was used to simulate the full-scale bioreactor. The two reactors received identical wastewater and were operated with same process: anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O). Both of them were located in the same WWTP and were operated by the Beijing Drainage Group Co. Ltd.
Activated sludge samples were monthly collected from the aerobic zone of the two bioreactors from May 2010 to April 2011. For archiving, each 1.5 ml sample was dispensed into a 2 ml sterile Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted, and the pellets were stored at −20°C prior to analysis. No specific permits were required for the described field studies. We confirm that: i) the locations were not privately-owned or protected in any way; and ii) the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.
DNA extraction
The pellets of the activated sludge samples were washed three times by centrifugation using sterile high-purify water for 5 min at 15,000×g. DNA was extracted using a FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biotechnology, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
PCR amplification and purification
The extracted DNA samples were amplified with a set of primers targeting the hypervariable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The forward primer is 5′-AYTGGGYDTAAAGNG-3′ and the reverse primers are an equal portion mixture of four primers, i.e. 5′-TACCRGGGTHTCTAATCC-3′, 5′-TACCAGAGTATCTAATTC-3′, 5′-CTACDSRGGTMTCTAATC-3′, and 5′-TACNVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′ [20], [21]. Barcodes that allow sample multiplexing during pyrosequencing were incorporated between the 454 adapter and the forward primer.
Pyrosequencing and sequence analysis
The composition of the PCR products of V4 region of 16S rRNA genes was determined by pyrosequencing using the Roche 454 FLX Titanium sequencer (Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA). Samples in this study were individually barcoded to enable multiplex sequencing. The raw reads have been deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Accession Number: SRR952788 and SRR954283). After pyrosequencing, Python scripts were written to remove sequences containing more than one ambiguous base (‘N’) and the sequences shorter than 150 bps. The RDP Classifier (Version 10.31) was used to assign all effective sequences to taxonomic ranks with a set confidence threshold of 50%.
Data analysis
Temporal variation of bacterial taxa was assessed graphically by the ordination method of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using a statistical software PC-ORD version 6 (MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA). In the present analysis, a matrix of the OTUs for each sample was used as input data. NMDS ordination was generated based on the Sorenson similarity matrix which was constructed for all pairs of samples.
Moving-window analysis was used to characterize the change rate of bacterial community in this study [22]. Firstly, a similarity matrix for each activated sludge sample was calculated based on Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient using SPSS version 17.0 software (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA). Then, each similarity percentage value was subtracted from the 100% similarity value to get the change values. Finally, moving-window analysis was performed by plotting the change values between month x and month x−1 [23]. The average change value Δt (one month) was calculated as the average and standard deviation for the respective change values [4].
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was used to reveal relationships between bacterial community dynamics and operational and environmental parameters. Statistically important explanatory variables were identified by the forward selection method using a Monte Carlo permutation test (499 permutations under the full model). Operational variables that failed to contribute significant improvement (P<0.05) to a model's explanatory power were excluded from final CCA analyses. The contributions of wastewater characteristics (W), operational parameters (O) and scale of bioreactor (S) to the variances of bacterial communities were assessed with variance partitioning analysis (VPA) using CCA. All wastewater characteristics, operational parameters, and bioreactor scale data were log2 (x+1) transformed for standardization. CCA and VPA were performed using the VEGAN package in R (v.2.15.1; http://www.r-project.org/)
Results
Bioreactor performance and operational conditions
For the one year period (May 2010 to April 2011), 13 operational and environmental parameters were monitored from the two activated sludge bioreactors. Variations in these parameters are summarized in Table S1 and S2. Performance of the full-scale bioreactor was relatively stable across the sampling period. Although biological oxygen demand (BOD) in the influents varying from 150 to 288 mg/L, the BOD removal efficiency was always excellent (>93%) over the duration of study. The average BOD concentration in the effluent was below 9 mg/L. Total nitrogen (TN) in the influent ranged from 35.9 to 69.3 mg/L, while the ammonium concentration was between 32.8 and 54.2 mg/L. The average removal efficiencies of TN and ammonia were 62% and 97%, giving final concentrations in effluent of less than 20.9 mg/L and 1.5 mg/L, respectively. The temperature of the bioreactor showed a seasonal pattern from 16.3°C (winter) to 25.1°C (summer). The bioreactor was maintained with relatively stable pH (7.1±0.3), hydraulic residence time (HRT) (8.2±1.3 h), DO (3.5±0.5 mg/L) and mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) (3,775±640 mg/L), while solid retention time (SRT) (8.7±2.1 days) exhibited a larger variation comparatively.
The lab-scale bioreactor was also relatively functional stable during the study period. The influent characteristics were the same as the full-scale bioreactor. The average BOD, TN and ammonia removal capacities were 94%, 61%, and 97%, giving final average concentrations in effluent of less than 7 mg/L, 22 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively. Other environmental and operational parameters (pH, DO, MLSS, HRT and SRT) were kept relatively stable (Table S2).
Bacterial community composition
By using 454 pyrosequencing, 13422–31151 effective sequence tags were yielded for the 24 samples. The library size of each sample was normalized to 13422 sequences by randomly removing the extra sequences, which was the smallest number of sequencing reads among the 24 samples, to conduct the downstream analyses for different samples at the same sequencing depth.
RDP Classifier was used to assign these sequence tags into different OTU with 3% of nucleotide cutoff. A total of 10223 OTUs were recovered from the full-scale bioreactor and 14791 OTUs were from the lab-scale bioreactor. Individual samples contained much smaller number of OTUs from 2513 to 3878 in the full-scale bioreactor and 2137 to 3275 within the lab-scale bioreactor (Table 1).
RDP Classifier was also used to assign these sequence tags into different phylogenetic bacterial taxa. The threshold for the bootstrap cutoff was set to 50% to ensure the classification reliability [12]. Table 1 summarizes the numbers of taxa at different levels of classification within the two bioreactors. The bacterial community composition of the two bioreactors showed typical activated sludge communities [21], [24], [25]. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria was the predominant phylum in the full-scale bioreactor, constituting between 19 and 51% of all detected OTUs. Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi were the subdominant groups, each containing 13–52%, 1–22% and 1–14% of the detections respectively. These four phyla represented approximately 73–95% of bacteria detected within the full-scale bioreactor. Within Proteobacteria the β-subdivision was the predominant group (26–54%), followed by α-Proteobacteria (6–43%), γ-Proteobacteria (7–37%) and δ-Proteobacteria (1–19%). Within the β-Proteobacteria, six taxa were identified. Rhodocyclales is the dominant group within a range of 25–68% of all 12 samples, followed by Burkholderiales and Burkholderiales, representing 14–52% and 8–32% of each population respectively. The other three detected groups (Burkholderiales, Rhodocyclales, and Burkholderiales) had fewer detections in all samples and constituted less than 10% of β-Proteobacteria.
Similar to the full-scale bioreactor, in the lab-scale bioreactor Proteobacteria was also the predominant phylum (22–49%), following Bacteroidetes (17–43%), Acidobacteria (2–23%), Chloroflexi (1–19%). Within Proteobacteria β-subdivision was the predominant group (17–49%), followed by α-Proteobacteria (7–46%), γ-Proteobacteria (5–39%) and δ-Proteobacteria (3–25%).
Tracking bacterial community dynamics
The temporal dynamics of the bacterial compositions within the two bioreactors was evaluated using an indirect gradient ordination technique nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination (Fig. 1) which was constructed based on the observed OTUs at a 3% cutoff. At a two-dimensional solution, the stress values of the ordination for the full- and lab-scale reactors were 16.7 and 14.8, respectively, demonstrating that the reduced NMDS ordinates preserve patterns in activated sludge bacterial community dynamics. In general, samples collected in similar time periods were clustered closely together in the ordination. This ordination pattern suggests a gradual succession within the overall bacterial community over time.
Sample numbers: 1- May 2010, 2- June 2010, 3-July 2010, 4- August 2010, 5-September 2010, 6- October 2010, 7-November 2010, 8-December 2010, 9-January 2011, 10- February 2011, 11-March 2011, 12-April 2011.
Moving window analysis was used to evaluate the change rate of bacterial community [26]. The correlation coefficients of two consecutive dates (one month) from the full-scale bioreactor were between 64% and 91%. Thus, changes were from 9% to 36% (Fig. 2), and the Δt (one month) was 21.4%±9.5%. While the change rate for the lab-scale bioreactor were 13%–41%, with the Δt(one month) 25.1%±11.7%, which is higher than the full-scale bioreactor.
Each data point in the graph is a comparison between two consecutive dates, as it represents the correlation between the samples of month x and month x−1.
Correlations between bacterial community dynamics and operational and environmental variables
CCA was performed to discern the possible relationship between bacterial community structure and operational and environmental variables (Fig. 3). Based on variance inflation factors (VIF) with 999 Monte Carlo permutations, four significant environmental variables: temperature, influent BOD, bioreactor scale and DO were selected in the CCA biplot. The length of an environmental parameter arrow in the ordination plot indicates the strength of the relationship of that parameter to community composition. As such, temperature, influent BOD, DO and Bioreactor scale appears to be the most important environmental parameters.
Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with bacterial community structures. Circles and triangles represent different bacterial community structures from the full- and lab-scale bioreactor, respectively. Samples are named with “F” (Full-scale bioreactor) or “L” (Lab-scale bioreactor) and numbers. Sample numbers: 1- May 2010, 2- June 2010, 3-July 2010, 4- August 2010, 5-September 2010, 6- October 2010, 7-November 2010, 8-December 2010, 9-January 2011, 10- February 2011, 11-March 2011, 12-April 2011.
VPA was further performed to assess the contributions of wastewater characteristics (BOD, TN, TP, pH), operational parameters (temperature, SRT, HRT, MLSS), and bioreactor scale to the bacterial community variance. Fig. 4 indicated that 49% of the variance could be explained by these three components. Wastewater characteristics, operational parameters and bioreactor scale could independently explain 20.3%, 19.9%, and 3.6% of the variation of bacterial communities, respectively. Interactions among the three major components seemed to have less influence than did individual components, and were only observed between wastewater characteristics and operational parameters (3.5%) and between wastewater characteristics and bioreactor scale (1.7%).
(a) General outline; (b) bacterial communities. Each diagram represents the biological variation partitioned into the relative effects of each factor or a combination of factors, in which geometric areas were proportional to the respective percentages of explained variation. The edges of the triangle represent the variation explained by each factor alone. The sides of the triangles represent interactions of any two factors, and the middle of the triangles represent interactions of all three factors.
Taxa-time relationship (TTR)
The bacterial TTRs for the two bioreactors were visualized using the power law equation S = cTw, as described above, and plotted in log-log space in Fig. 5. The TTR relationship exponent (w) is the slope of the linear regression line fitted to the log–log plots, which can be considered a measure of temporal turnover of microbial taxa. The exponents (i.e., temporal turnover rate) for the full-scale bioreactor was 0.43 (R2 = 0.970), which is lower that of the lab-scale bioreactor (w = 0.55, R2 = 0.971).
The lines are fitted to a power law equation S = cTw, where S is the number of observed taxa, c is the constant, T is the time, and w is the taxa-time relationship exponent.
The TTRs for phyla level was further analyzed. The results showed that the power law exponents of 13 phyla ranged from 0.32 to 0.57 in the two bioreactors (Table 2), suggesting that bacterial phyla have different temporal turnover rates. Interestingly, the exponents of dominant phyla were general lower than that of the rare phyla (Table 2). For example, the average exponents of five most dominant phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi and Verrucomicrobia) within the full- and lab-scale bioreactor were 0.35 and 0.36, while that of the five rarest phyla (Synergistetes, Fusobacteria, TM7, Euryarchaeota and OP10) were 0.50 and 0.55.
Discussion
Understanding the factors that shape microbial community structure in WWTPs could potentially enhance treatment performance and control. In this study, CCA ordination analysis indicated that temperature was an important variable influencing microbial community structures. This agrees with the findings of Wells et al. [5], who suggested, based on the survey of bacteria community variance via terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) in a full-scale WWTP, that water temperature is one of the most influential variables on bacterial community variance. Similar results have also been obtained in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) bioreactor by Siggins et al. [27]. As with temperature, influent BOD was also significantly linked to bacterial community structures. BOD provides carbon and energy sources to heterotrophic bacteria and influences the growth rate of the bacteria [12]. Previous studies have reported that BOD (or organic loading) was an important factor to mediate the bacterial community structures [28]. In addition to temperature and influent BOD, DO was also strongly and significantly linked to bacterial community variance in CCA analyses. DO is well recognized as a critical process parameter in biological wastewater treatment processes, due to its impact on bacterial activity and the high operational costs of aeration, but little is known about the specific selection of distinct bacterial lineages by DO concentration [29]. The results of this study showed that DO had a significant effect in shaping the bacterial community structure in wastewater treatment systems. In two lab-scale bioreactors with high and low DO concentrations, Park et al. [30] have also demonstrated that DO concentration was an important structuring factor based on the T-RFLP analysis of bacterial community structures. Bioreactor scale is also one of the important factors mediating the bacterial community. To data, there are rare studies have examined the effect of bioreactor scale on the microbial community structure and diversity. In seven membrane bioreactors (MBR) of increasing size, van der Gast et al. [31] observed a significant linear relationship between bacterial taxa richness and reactor size, and they also found a gradient of greater evenness in community structure as MBR volume increased. Additional research is warranted to establish a firm understanding of how bioreactor sizes affect microbial communities in activated sludge systems.
The VPA results showed that 49% of the community variances were explained by these three components. Thus 51% of the community variance could not be explained by these three components. It is reasonable to expect that some unmonitored wastewater and operational variables may play an influential role in mediating bacterial community structures in WWTPs. In addition to the deterministic factors (wastewater and operational variables), the neutral factors (random immigration and births/deaths) may also affect the structure of the bacterial community. Ofiteru et al. [9] demonstrated that, in a full-scale WWTP, the variation of bacterial community was consistent with neutral community assembly, where chance and random immigration played an important and predictable role in shaping the communities. In four activated sludge bioreactors, Ayarza and Erijman [32] illustrated that both neutral and deterministic effects operated simultaneously in the assembly of bacterial floc. Similar results were also observed in other studies [33], [34] [35]. The relative influence of deterministic environmental and stochastic factors in structuring microbial communities within bioreactors warrants future investigation.
We demonstrated that accumulation of observed bacterial taxa in activated sludge over time followed a power-law relationship, with a power-law exponent of w = 0.43 and 0.55 for a full- and lab-scale bioreactors, respectively. The values fell within the typical values determined previously. Shade et al. [16] conducted a meta-analysis of temporal dynamics in microbial communities, including 76 sites representing air, aquatic, soil, brewery wastewater treatment, human- and plant-associated microbial biomes. They found that there was a very consistent TTR across microbial communities, and the power law exponents ranged between 0.24 and 0.61. Our observed scaling exponent is also well in line with the few previous studies that have examined TTRs of bacterial taxa in activated sludge systems. van der Gast et al. [11] employed lab-scale reactors to examine the impact of different percentages of municipal and industrial wastewater on TTR exponent, and found that the power law exponent decreased pronounced from 0.512 to 0.162 as selective pressure (industrial wastewater concentration) increased. Wells et al. [10] detailed a power law exponent of w = 0.209 for bacterial communities in a full-scale WWTP, based on T-RFLP of bacterial 16S rRNA gene.
In our study, the power law exponents of dominant phyla were general lower than that of the rare phyla. Similar results were also obtained by Kim et al. [12], who reported that in a full-scale activated sludge bioreactor, the exponents for the general and rare bacterial taxa were 0.23 and 0.55, respectively.
The power law exponent of the full-scale bioreactor is lower than the value for the lab-scale bioreactor. It is tempting to speculate that this discrepancy is associated with the more than five order of magnitude variation in volume between these two reactors. Indeed, White et al. [18] has demonstrated that the exponent of TTR in macroecology was negatively correlated the spatial scale of observation, and van der et al. [11] suggested that this may be the case in microecolgy as well. Moreover, recent work has demonstrated the interdependence of spatial and temporal accumulation of species in the species-time-area relationship (STAR) in various systems [36]. Additional research is warranted to study the relationship between spatial and temporal turnover in microbial systems.
In conclusion, our results showed that accumulation of observed taxa in activated sludge over time followed a power-law relationship. The power-law exponent w for the full-scale bioreactor was 0.43, which is lower that of the lab-scale bioreactor (w = 0.55). The power law exponents of dominant phyla were general lower than that of the rare phyla within the two bioreactors. Overall, our results suggest that bacterial communities of activated sludge exhibited TTRs similar to those observed previously for plant and animal communities. These results highlight that a continued integration of microbial ecology into the broader field of ecology.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Operational conditions and bioreactor performance of the full-scale bioreactor.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090175.s001
(DOCX)
Table S2.
Operational conditions and bioreactor performance of the lab-scale bioreactor.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090175.s002
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: XW RH. Performed the experiments: YW ZD. Analyzed the data: XW XL. Wrote the paper: XW.
References
- 1. Gentile ME, Jessup CM, Nyman JL, Criddle CS (2007) Correlation of functional instability and community dynamics in denitrifying dispersed-growth reactors. Appl Environ Microb 73: 680–690.
- 2. Rittmann BE, Hausner M, Loffler F, Love NG, Muyzer G, et al. (2006) A vista for microbial ecology and environmental biotechnology. Environ Sci Technol 40: 1096–1103.
- 3. Briones A, Raskin L (2003) Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. Curr Opin Biotech 14: 270–276.
- 4. Wang X, Wen X, Xia Y, Hu M, Zhao F, et al. (2012) Ammonia oxidizing bacteria community dynamics in a pilot-scale wastewater treatment plant. Plos One 7: e36272.
- 5. Wells GF, Park HD, Yeung CH, Eggleston B, Francis CA, et al. (2009) Ammonia-oxidizing communities in a highly aerated full-scale activated sludge bioreactor: betaproteobacterial dynamics and low relative abundance of Crenarchaea. Environ Microbiol 11: 2310–2328.
- 6. Gentile ME, Nyman JL, Criddle CS (2007) Correlation of patterns of denitrification instability in replicated bioreactor communities with shifts in the relative abundance and the denitrification patterns of specific populations. ISME J 1: 714–728.
- 7. Slater FR, Johnson CR, Blackall LL, Beiko RG, Bond PL (2010) Monitoring associations between clade-level variation, overall community structure and ecosystem function in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Water Res 44: 4908–4923.
- 8. Fernandez AS, Hashsham SA, Dollhopf SL, Raskin L, Glagoleva O, et al. (2000) Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl Environ Microb 66: 4058–4067.
- 9. Ofiteru ID, Lunn M, Curtis TP, Wells GF, Criddle CS, et al. (2010) Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 15345–15350.
- 10. Wells GF, Park HD, Eggleston B, Francis CA, Criddle CS (2011) Fine-scale bacterial community dynamics and the taxa-time relationship within a full-scale activated sludge bioreactor. Water Res 45: 5476–5488.
- 11. van der Gast CJ, Ager D, Lilley AK (2008) Temporal scaling of bacterial taxa is influenced by both stochastic and deterministic ecological factors. Environ Microbiol 10: 1411–1418.
- 12. Kim T-S, Jeong J-Y, Wells GF, Park H-D (2013) General and rare bacterial taxa demonstrating different temporal dynamic patterns in an activated sludge bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biot 97: 1755–1765.
- 13. Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, et al. (2012) Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3: 417.
- 14. Werner JJ, Knights D, Garcia ML, Scalfone NB, Smith S, et al. (2011) Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 4158–4163.
- 15. Cocolin L, Bisson LF, Mills DA (2000) Direct profiling of the yeast dynamics in wine fermentations. Fems Microbiol Lett 189: 81–87.
- 16. Shade A, Gregory Caporaso J, Handelsman J, Knight R, Fierer N (2013) A meta-analysis of changes in bacterial and archaeal communities with time. ISME J 7: 1493–1506.
- 17. Adler PB, White EP, Lauenroth WK, Kaufman DM, Rassweiler A, et al. (2005) Evidence for a general species-time-area relationship. Ecology 86: 2032–2039.
- 18. White EP, Adler PB, Lauenroth WK, Gill RA, Greenberg D, et al. (2006) A comparison of the species-time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. Oikos 112: 185–195.
- 19. Matthews B, Pomati F (2012) Reversal in the relationship between species richness and turnover in a phytoplankton community. Ecology 93: 2435–2447.
- 20. Ye L, Shao MF, Zhang T, Tong AHY, Lok S (2011) Analysis of the bacterial community in a laboratory-scale nitrification reactor and a wastewater treatment plant by 454-pyrosequencing. Water Res 45: 4390–4398.
- 21. Wang X, Hu M, Xia Y, Wen X, Ding K (2012) Pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in 14 wastewater treatment systems in china. Appl Environ Microb 78: 7042–7047.
- 22. Marzorati M, Wittebolle L, Boon N, Daffonchio D, Verstraete W (2008) How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. Environ Microbiol 10: 1571–1581.
- 23. Wang XH, Wen XH, Yan HJ, Ding K, Zhao F, et al. (2011) Bacterial community dynamics in a functionally stable pilot-scale wastewater treatment plant. Bioresource Technol 102: 2352–2357.
- 24. Zhang T, Shao MF, Ye L (2012) 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME J 6: 1137–1147.
- 25. Hu M, Wang X, Wen X, Xia Y (2012) Microbial community structures in different wastewater treatment plants as revealed by 454-pyrosequencing analysis. Bioresource Technol 117: 72–79.
- 26. Wittebolle L, Vervaeren H, Verstraete W, Boon N (2008) Quantifying community dynamics of nitrifiers in functionally stable reactors. Appl Environ Microb 74: 286–293.
- 27. Siggins A, Enright AM, O'Flaherty V (2011) Temperature dependent (37-15 degrees C) anaerobic digestion of a trichloroethylene-contaminated wastewater. Bioresource Technol 102: 7645–7656.
- 28. Pholchan MK, Baptista JD, Davenport RJ, Curtis TP (2010) Systematic study of the effect of operating variables on reactor performance and microbial diversity in laboratory-scale activated sludge reactors. Water Res 44: 1341–1352.
- 29. Liu G, Wang J (2013) Long-Term Low DO Enriches and Shifts Nitrifier Community in Activated Sludge. Environ Sci Technol 47: 5109–5117.
- 30. Park HD, Noguera DR (2004) Evaluating the effect of dissolved oxygen on ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in activated sludge. Water Res 38: 3275–3286.
- 31. van der Gast CJ, Jefferson B, Reid E, Robinson T, Bailey MJ, et al. (2006) Bacterial diversity is determined by volume in membrane bioreactors. Environ Microbiol 8: 1048–1055.
- 32. Ayarza JM, Erijman L (2011) Balance of Neutral and Deterministic Components in the Dynamics of Activated Sludge Floc Assembly. Microbial Ecol 61: 486–495.
- 33. Curtis TP, Sloan WT (2006) Towards the design of diversity: stochastic models for community assembly in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 54: 227–236.
- 34. Sloan WT, Lunn M, Woodcock S, Head IM, Nee S, et al. (2006) Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ Microbiol 8: 732–740.
- 35. Graham DW, Knapp CW, Van Vleck ES, Bloor K, Lane TB, et al. (2007) Experimental demonstration of chaotic instability in biological nitrification. ISME J 1: 385–393.
- 36. McGlinn DJ, Palmer MW (2009) Modeling the sampling effect in the species-time-area relationship. Ecology 90: 836–846.