Figures
Abstract
Colloidal Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using a gamma-radiolysis method in an aqueous solution containing iron chloride in presence of polyvinyl alcohol and isopropanol as colloidal stabilizer and hydroxyl radical scavenger, respectively. Gamma irradiation was carried out in a 60Co gamma source chamber at different absorbed doses. Increasing the radiation dose above a certain critical dose (100 kGy) leads to particle agglomeration enhancement, and this can influence the structure and crystallinity, and consequently the magnetic properties of the resultant particles. The optimal condition for formation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with a uniform and narrow size distribution occurred at a dose of 100 kGy, as confirmed by X-ray diffractometry and transmission electron microscopy. A vibrating sample magnetometry study showed that, when radiation dose increased, the saturation and remanence magnetization decreased, whereas the coercivity and the remanence ratio increased. This magnetic behavior results from variations in crystallinity, surface effects, and particle size effects, which are all dependent on the radiation dose. In addition, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was performed to investigate the nature of the bonds formed between the polymer chains and the metal surface at different radiation doses.
Citation: Abedini A, Daud AR, Abdul Hamid MA, Kamil Othman N (2014) Radiolytic Formation of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Influence of Radiation Dose on Structure and Magnetic Properties. PLoS ONE 9(3): e90055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090055
Editor: Vipul Bansal, RMIT University, Australia
Received: November 25, 2013; Accepted: January 28, 2014; Published: March 7, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Abedini et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work is supported by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia through grants No. DIP-2012-14 and FRGS/2/2013/SG06/UKM/02/4. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Introduction
Magnetic nanoparticles have attracted considerable interest in recent years by virtue of their unique physical and chemical properties, which can differ significantly from the bulk or molecular properties of the respective materials [1]. Because of their proposed applications in several areas such as medical technologies, both in vivo and in vitro, much effort has been dedicated to the preparation of magnetic nanoparticles [2]. Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in particular are considered to be highly promising candidates for a broad range of applications because of their unique structural and magnetic properties, non-toxicity, and high chemical stability [3], [4], [5], [6]. Magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical uses should possess certain physical features such as small size and a narrow size distribution in order to provide uniform physical and chemical properties in addition to superparamagnetic behavior. These properties make them an ideal candidate for applications such as targeted drug delivery [7], [8], [9], hyperthermic treatments [10], [11], [12], magnetic resonance imaging enhancement, and sensing devices [13], [14].
There are various wet chemical methods for preparing the magnetic nanoparticles such as solvothermal [15], [16], sol-gel [17], [18], thermal decomposition [19], [20], and coprecipitation [21], [22] techniques. In addition to these, radiolytic reduction is another promising technique [23], [24].
Typically, the radiation source used in radiolytic reduction is either an electron beam or gamma-ray generator. In gamma radiolysis, a large number of solvated electrons are produced during irradiation in an aqueous solution. These can reduce the metal ions to lower oxidation states or even to neutral metal atoms [25]. Furthermore, this technique avoids the use of reducing agents and the associated side reactions. The reduction of metal ions under gamma irradiation will lead to the formation of metal nanoparticles. In the common chemical reduction methods, the rate of the reducing reaction is the primary parameter determining the size of the nanoparticles, so that high reducing agent concentrations are preferable for small nanoparticles. In the radiolytic reduction method, the average size of the nanoparticles is influenced by the concentration of reducing species released during irradiation. This concentration can be controlled via the irradiation dose. Additionally, the reducing species generated by the radiation, penetrates deeply into the aqueous sample and randomly reduces the metal ions throughout the solution. Consequently, newly-formed nuclei will be distributed homogeneously throughout the solution, and this tends to produce highly dispersed nanoparticles [26].
This paper reports the synthesis of colloidal Fe3O4 nanoparticles using a radiolytic reduction method in an aqueous solution. The influence of radiation dose on the formation, structure, and magnetic properties of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were studied and discussed.
Experimental section
Materials
Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3.6H2O), used as the precursor material, was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Missouri, United States). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, molecular weight = 89,000, Sigma Aldrich), isopropanol, and sodium hydroxide (Na(OH), Macron, Pennsylvania, United States) were used as a stabilizer to control the growth, a hydroxyl radical scavenger, and a pH adjuster, respectively. Deionized water was used as the solvent.
Synthesis Procedure
The magnetic nano-colloids based on magnetite (Fe3O4) and organic solvents were prepared using a gamma irradiation technique from an aqueous salt solution of Fe(III) in an alkaline medium and suspended in a carrier liquid. 2 mmol of FeCl3·6H2O was dissolved in a stock solution of 4% PVA, which was prepared by dissolving PVA powder in deionized water in presence of isopropanol. The solution was stirred for 1 h at 70°C, then 0.4 M Na(OH) was added dropwise to the solution to increase the pH to 12. This final solution was irradiated with gamma-rays from a 60Co source to various absorbed doses up to 200 kGy at a dose rate of 2 kGy/h.
Characterization
The structural characteristics and average particle sizes were determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a Phillips CM-12 operated at 100 kV. Samples for TEM studies were prepared by placing a drop of the irradiated solutions on a copper TEM grid. Prior to microscopy, the samples were allowed to dry naturally on the grids for several hours. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were recorded in the range 650–4,000 cm−1 on a Spectrum 400 FTIR spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer) with the samples embedded in KBr pellets. The crystal structure of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles was characterized using X-ray diffractometry (XRD), performed at a scanning rate of 0.025°/0.1 s over the 2θ range 20–90° on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker) with graphite-monochromatized Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The magnetic properties of nanoparticles were determined at 25°C using a model 9500 (LDJ) computerized vibrating sample magnetometer.
Results and discussion
Formation of PVA-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles
A simplified scheme of the interactions between the PVA capping agent and the metal ions, both before and after irradiation, is shown in Figure 1. Prior to irradiation, the Fe (III) ions are bound by ionic bonds to the polymeric chains (Figure 1-a). PVA acts as a stabilizer for dissolved metallic salts through steric and electrostatic stabilization. However, the full mechanism is more complex, because of the presence of hydrogen bonds, both between the water molecules themselves and between the water molecules and the polarized groups on the polymer. When the system was irradiated by gamma rays, many active intermediates were generated during the radiolysis of water [25]. (1)Among these active species, the solvated electrons (
) are strong reducing agents and can reduce Fe (III) ions into lower-state Fe (II) ions and, with very low probability, neutral iron atoms:
(2a)or
(2b)Because the system was kept in an oxidative air atmosphere during irradiation, these iron particles were quickly oxidized because of their high activity, resulting in the formation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [27].
(3)The metal nanoparticle surfaces are likely to be stabilized through strong associations between the Fe3O4 nanoparticle surfaces and the ‘O’ atoms of the carboxyl groups of PVA (Figure 1-b) [28]. With increasing gamma dose, additional polymer radicals are formed indirectly by reaction with the H• and OH• radicals that arise from the irradiation of water molecules. These polymer radicals may interact with one another by disproportion, and combination through inter- and/or intra-molecular crosslinking, giving a 3D polymer network that can influence the crystal structure of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Figure 1-c) [29].
(a) interactions between PVA molecules and Fe3+ ions before irradiation; (b) interaction between PVA and the surfaces of Fe3O4 nanoparticles after irradiation; and (c) coating of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles by crosslinking of the polymer at high radiation doses.
Figure 2 shows the TEM results for the iron oxide nanoparticles obtained at the 100 kGy and 150 kGy radiation doses and their associated size distribution. It was observed that the nanoparticles in all of the samples are generally spherical in the shape, and their average size increases with the dose, from 2.2 nm at 100 kGy to 3.9 nm at 150 kGy. Increasing the radiation dose favored the generation of more solvated electrons, which in turn enhanced the reduction rate and, consequently, increased the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio. This enhanced ratio leads to a greater number of resulting nanoparticles. These small particles collide with each other according to their random movement in the solution, and the magnetic interactions between these nanoparticles leads to particle aggregation. Figure 2-c clearly shows that the agglomeration of particles occurred in a sample irradiated at a higher dose. By increasing the gamma dose from 150 to 200 kGy, nanoparticles have been surrounded by a thicker layer of PVA as a result of crosslinking of the polymer chains. Because of this crosslinking phenomenon the TEM image cannot be formed clearly in this range of radiation (Figure S1).
TEM images and size distributions of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized at: a, b) 100 kGy, with average size of 2.2 nm, and c, d) 150 kGy, with average size of 3.9 nm.
The presence of specific chemical groups in the materials and attachment of the polymer on to the surface of nanoparticles have been investigated using FTIR. Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra of the PVA-Fe3+ complexes before irradiation and coated iron oxide nanoparticles after irradiation at different doses. The strong broad band observed around 3,300 cm−1 has been assigned to the stretching of alcoholic O–H groups resulting from the intra- and inter-molecular type of hydrogen bonds in the polymer. A considerable reduction in the intensity and an increase in the width of the O–H peaks with increasing gamma dose indicates the possible formation of crosslinked polymer chains under irradiation [30]. C–H stretching vibrations were observed at 2,930 cm−1 [31]. The peaks at 1,700 and 1,450 cm−1 correspond to C = O and asymmetrical COO− stretching vibrations, respectively [31], [32], [33]. These vibrational bands confirm coordination of the metal oxides by the carboxylate groups of the polymer. The additional band around 1,100 cm−1, which appeared at all doses, corresponds to the C–O stretching peak in the presence of iron ions in the resultant polymeric complexes [34]. The small peak present at 850 cm−1 is attributed to CH2 stretching vibrations which is observed in the PVA-coated iron oxide particles [33].
(a) PVA-iron ion complexes before irradiation and irradiated PVA- iron oxide nanoparticles at (b) 100 kGy, and (c) 150 kGy gamma doses.
Effect of radiation dose on structure and magnetic properties
Increasing the radiation dose can increase the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio. Small values of this ratio (<0.3) are known to produce goethite (α-FeOOH) preferentially, especially in wet environments [35]. At low doses (<100 kGy), because of the lack of solvated electrons, the Fe2+ ion concentration was lower than the concentration of unreduced Fe3+ ions. This condition favors the formation of poorly crystallized phases of α-FeOOH as demonstrated by XRD (Figure 4). By increasing the gamma dose, the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio increases, and the resultant particles become more homogenous in composition with higher degree of ordering [35], [36]. The lattice constants, calculated from the XRD patterns in Figure 4, were 8.41 Å for the sample irradiated at 100 kGy, and 8.4 Å for the sample irradiated at 150 kGy. These values are closer to that of Fe3O4 (8.396 Å) than γ-Fe2O3 (8.345 Å) [4]. This result indicates that, by increasing the dose, the Fe3O4 phase becomes the preferred phase. The intensity of the Fe3O4 peaks decreases with increasing radiation dose and disappears at 200 kGy. This might be related to the increase in the number of nanoparticles in the amorphous phase, which is as a result of greater crosslinking in the PVA coatings [37].
The magnetic properties of nanoparticles are determined by many factors, including their chemical composition, the type and the degree of defectiveness of the crystal lattice, the global electron configuration of molecules, the interaction between neighboring spins, and the particle size and shape [38].
Magnetite has an inverse spinel structure with a mixed (Fe2+ and Fe3+) iron oxide content composed with a cubic close-packed oxygen array [39]. Its formula is written as Fe3+A[Fe3+Fe2+]BO4, and in its unit cell, all tetrahedral sites are occupied by Fe3+ (“A” sites), and octahedral sites are occupied by both Fe3+ and Fe2+ (“B” sites) (Figure 5-a and 5-b) [40]. The electron spins in the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the octahedral sites are coupled, and the spins of the Fe3+ ions in the tetrahedral sites are coupled as well, but anti-parallel to the former (Figure 5-c). As can be seen in Figure 5-c, Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions with octahedral coordination are ferromagnetically coupled through a double-exchange mechanism. An electron, whose spin is colored red, can be exchanged between two octahedral sites. On the other hand, the Fe3+ ions in tetrahedral and octahedral sites are coupled anti-ferromagnetically via the oxygen atom. In this configuration, all Fe3+ spins cancel each other out and thus the unpaired spins of Fe2+ ions in octahedral sites contribute to the overall magnetization. The multiple magnetic domains of Fe3O4 exhibit magnetic moments, which are all aligned within a given domain, but between the domains magnetic moments are oriented in random directions. Thus, it can be categorized as a ferrimagnetic material [41].
Schematic figures of : (a) Simplified crystal structure of Fe3O4; (b) Octahedral and tetrahedral sites showing cations and oxygen; (c) Schematic depiction of the splitting of 5 d orbitals of iron ions in octahedral and tetrahedral sites.
Decreasing the size of the magnetic body results in two important types of magnetic behavior, namely, single-domain ferrimagnetism and superparamagnetism. In single-domain nanoparticles, only coherent magnetization rotation can overcome the effective anisotropy of the particle, but domain wall movement is not possible. By decreasing the particle size, the magnetization is no longer stable and the particle is said to be superparamagnetic [42].
The superparamagnetic behavior of our nanoparticles fabricated using various radiation doses are illustrated by the hysteresis loops collected at 300 K, as shown in Figure 6-a. At room temperature, all irradiated samples exhibit negligible magnetic remanence, and the initial slopes of the magnetization curves are steep. These facts are related to finite-size and surface effects in the superparamagnetic nanoparticles [43]. The variation in saturation magnetization and remanence with radiation dose are shown in Figure 6-b. It is evident that, when the radiation dose increases from 100 to 200 kGy, the saturation magnetization decreases from 10.99 to 2.3 emu/g. The largest saturation magnetization was 10.99 emu/g for the sample irradiated at 100 kGy, which is much lower than that reported for the bulk magnetite (92emu/g). The decrease in size, from bulk to nano scope, causes the large surface spin canting, and consequently, a significant reduction in the magnetization value [44].
(a) Hysteresis loop of magnetite nanoparticles at various radiation doses; (b) Variation of Ms(emu/g) and Mr(emu/g) vs. radiation dose.
In addition, the appearance of the polymer layer on the outer shells of magnetite particles can reduce the saturation magnetization. This can be interpreted as a reduction of the magnetic volume. The magnetic moments of the surface Fe3O4 particles bonded to carbonyl chain of polymer and therefore being quenched [45]. The variation in the saturation magnetization of the samples with increasing dose can be attributed to the existence of a magnetically disordered spin layer on the particles' surface, or the existence of canted spins [46]. On the other hand, with increasing radiation dose the thickness of the polymer coating on the surface of nanoparticles increases because of the higher degree of crosslinking. This results in decreased values of the saturation magnetization. The dependence of remanence on radiation dose is shown in Figure 6-b. Decreases in the inter-grain exchange coupling force resulting from increases in size, leads to randomization of the orientation. This behavior has been associated with thick polymer layers produced by high radiation doses and leads to smaller remanence values [47].
In finite-size nanoparticles, which have no mobile domain walls, the magnetization will be reversed through spin rotation rather than through the motion of domain walls. This results in larger coercivity of the nanoparticles compared to their bulk counterparts [46]. Figures 7-a and 7-b show that the values of the coercivity field (Hc) and remanence ratio (R = Mr/Ms) of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles increase with increasing gamma dose from 100 to 200 kGy as a result of particle size enhancement. Another reason for the increased coercivity with radiation dose is the strong bonds established between adsorbed crosslinked polymer layers on the surface of iron oxide nanoparticles, which could block spin-flip conversion. The remanence ratio, which is described as the existence or absence of different types of inter-grain group exchanges, varies from 0 to 1 [48]. Values of R lower than 0.5 indicate that the particles interact by magnetostatic interactions, while R = 0.5 indicates randomly oriented non-interacting particles that undergo coherent rotations. The observed values between 0.5 and 1 confirm the existence of exchange-coupling particles [49]. Therefore, the R values for samples irradiated at 100, 150, and 200 kGy are lower than 0.5 are attributed to particles that interact by magnetostatic interactions.
(a) Hysteresis loops under a low applied field and (b) variation of the coercivity field (Hc) and remanence ratio (R = Mr/Ms) with the radiation dose.
Conclusion
In summary, magnetite nanoparticles with different sizes and crystallinities have been synthesized using radiolytic reduction method by gamma irradiation. The XRD studies confirm the cubic crystal structure of Fe3O4, especially at the 100 kGy dose. The TEM images indicate that the synthesized magnetite nanoparticles are almost spherical in shape and that the particle size increases with absorbed dose. An FT-IR analysis of the colloidal nanoparticles confirmed that PVA was absorbed onto the outer shell of Fe3O4 nanoparticles during particle growth. All samples exhibit superparamagnetism, and their saturation magnetization, remanence and coercivities were found to be dependent on the particle size, crystallinity, and the thickness of adsorbed crosslinked polymer layers on the surface of iron oxide nanoparticles.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
TEM image of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized at 200 kGy. This image cannot be formed clearly in higher magnification because of thick layer of crosslinked polymer coating.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090055.s001
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank to Centre of Research and Instrumentation Management (CRIM) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for providing laboratory facilities. We also appreciate stimulating discussions with Dr. Farhad Larki (Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: AA ARD MAAH NK. Performed the experiments: AA. Analyzed the data: AA. Wrote the paper: AA. Prepared the manuscript: AA ARD. Approved the final version of manuscript for publication: AA ARD MAAH NKO.
References
- 1. Faraji M, Yamini Y, Rezaee M (2010) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, functionalization, characterization, and applications. J Iran Chem Soc 7: 1–37.
- 2. Compean-Jasso M, Ruiz F, Martinez J, Herrera-Gomez A (2008) Magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles synthesized by forced hydrolysis. Mater Lett 62: 4248–4250.
- 3. Abbas M, Rao BP, Naga S, Takahashi M, Kim C (2013) Synthesis of high magnetization hydrophilic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in single reaction-surfactantless polyol process. Ceram Int 39: 7605–7611.
- 4. Ozkaya T, Toprak MS, Baykal A, Kavas H, Köseoğlu Y, et al. (2009) Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 100°C and its magnetic characterization. J Alloy Compd 472: 18–23.
- 5. Sohn B, Cohen R, Papaefthymiou G (1998) Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoclusters within microdomains of block copolymers. J Magn Magn Mater 182: 216–224.
- 6. Finkelstein G, Glicofridis P, Ashoori R, Shayegan M (2000) Topographic mapping of the quantum Hall liquid using a few-electron bubble. Science 289: 90–94.
- 7. Häfeli U, Pauer G, Failing S, Tapolsky G (2001) Radiolabeling of magnetic particles with rhenium-188 for cancer therapy. J Magn Magn Mater 225: 73–78.
- 8. Xu C, Xu K, Gu H, Zheng R, Liu H, et al. (2004) Dopamine as a robust anchor to immobilize functional molecules on the iron oxide shell of magnetic nanoparticles. Am Chem So 126: 9938–9939.
- 9. Gu H, Xu K, Yang Z, Chang CK, Xu B (2005) Synthesis and cellular uptake of porphyrin decorated iron oxide nanoparticles—a potential candidate for bimodal anticancer therapy. Chem commun 4270–4272.
- 10. Gonzales-Weimuller M, Zeisberger M, Krishnan KM (2009) Size-dependant heating rates of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater 321: 1947–1950.
- 11. Fortin J-P, Wilhelm C, Servais J, Ménager C, Bacri J-C, et al. (2007) Size-sorted anionic iron oxide nanomagnets as colloidal mediators for magnetic hyperthermia. J Am Chem So 129: 2628–2635.
- 12. Johannsen M, Thiesen B, Wust P, Jordan A (2010) Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for prostate cancer. Int J Hyperther 26: 790–795.
- 13. Högemann D, Josephson L, Weissleder R, Basilion JP (2000) Improvement of MRI probes to allow efficient detection of gene expression. Bioconjugate Chem 11: 941–946.
- 14. Billotey C, Wilhelm C, Devaud M, Bacri J, Bittoun J, et al. (2003) Cell internalization of anionic maghemite nanoparticles: quantitative effect on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 49: 646–654.
- 15. Hou Y, Yu J, Gao S (2003) Solvothermal reduction synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 13: 1983–1987.
- 16. Yan A, Liu X, Qiu G, Wu H, Yi R, et al. (2008) Solvothermal synthesis and characterization of size-controlled Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Alloy Compd 458: 487–491.
- 17. Deng Y-H, Wang C-C, Hu J-H, Yang W-L, Fu S-K (2005) Investigation of formation of silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles via sol–gel approach. Coll Surf A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 262: 87–93.
- 18. Lu Y, Yin Y, Mayers BT, Xia Y (2002) Modifying the surface properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles through a sol-gel approach. Nano lett 2: 183–186.
- 19. Chen Y, Peng D-L, Lin D, Luo X (2007) Preparation and magnetic properties of nickel nanoparticles via the thermal decomposition of nickel organometallic precursor in alkylamines. Nanotechnology 18: 505703.
- 20. Roca A, Morales M, O'Grady K, Serna C (2006) Structural and magnetic properties of uniform magnetite nanoparticles prepared by high temperature decomposition of organic precursors. Nanotechnology 17: 2783.
- 21. Qu Y, Yang H, Yang N, Fan Y, Zhu H, et al. (2006) The effect of reaction temperature on the particle size, structure and magnetic properties of coprecipitated CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Mater Lett 60: 3548–3552.
- 22. Kim YI, Kim D, Lee CS (2003) Synthesis and characterization of CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles prepared by temperature-controlled coprecipitation method. Physica B: Condensed Matter 337: 42–51.
- 23. Kim SW, Kwon BJ, Park JH, Hur MG, Yang SD, et al. (2010) γ-ray Radiation Induced Synthesis and Characterization of α-Cobalt Hydroxide Nanoparticles. Bull Korean Chem Soc 31: 910–914.
- 24. Seino S, Kinoshita T, Nakagawa T, Kojima T, Taniguci R, et al. (2008) Radiation induced synthesis of gold/iron-oxide composite nanoparticles using high-energy electron beam. J Nanopart Res 10: 1071–1076.
- 25. Abedini A, Larki F, Saion E, Zakaria A, Zobir Hussein M (2012) Influence of dose and ion concentration on formation of inary Al-Ni alloy nanoclusters. Radiat Phys Chem 81: 1653–1658.
- 26. Belloni J (2006) Nucleation, growth and properties of nanoclusters studied by radiation chemistry: application to catalysis. Catal today 113: 141–156.
- 27. YH N, XW G, Zhang Z, YE Q (2002) Fabrication and characterization of the plate-shaped gamma-Fe2O3 nanocrystals [J]. Chem Mater 14: 1048–1052.
- 28. Rao Y, Banerjee D, Datta A, Das S, Guin R, et al. (2010) Gamma irradiation route to synthesis of highly re-dispersible natural polymer capped silver nanoparticles. Radiat Phys Chem 79: 1240–1246.
- 29. Nikolic VM, Krkljes A, Popovic ZK, Lausevic ZV, Miljanic SS (2007) On the use of gamma irradiation crosslinked PVA membranes in hydrogen fuel cells. Electrochem Commun 9: 2661–2665.
- 30. Gohil J, Bhattacharya A, Ray P (2006) Studies on the crosslinking of poly (vinyl alcohol). J Polym Res 13: 161–169.
- 31. Mansur HS, Sadahira CM, Souza AN, Mansur AA (2008) FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Mater Sci Eng: C 28: 539–548.
- 32. Labidi N, Djebaili A (2008) Studies of the mechanism of polyvinyl alcohol adsorption on the calcite/water interface in the presence of sodium oleate. J Minerals Mater Charac Eng 7: 147–161.
- 33. Kayal S, Ramanujan R (2010) Doxorubicin loaded PVA coated iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng: C 30: 484–490.
- 34. Saeed R, Masood S, Uddin F (2008) Ionic interaction of electrolyte with dilute solution of poly (vinyl alcohol) at different temperatures. Phys Chem Liq 46: 9–17.
- 35. Lodhia J, Mandarano G, Ferris N, Eu P, Cowell S (2010) Development and use of iron oxide nanoparticles (Part 1): Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI. Biomed Imaging Inter J 6: e12.
- 36. Jolivet J, Belleville P, Tronc E, Livage J (1992) Influence of Fe (II) on the formation of the spinel iron oxide in alkaline medium. Clay Clay Miner 40: 531–531.
- 37. El-Sawy N, El-Arnaouty M, Ghaffar AA (2010) γ-Irradiation effect on the non-cross-linked and cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol films. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 49: 169–177.
- 38. Gubin SP, Koksharov YA, Khomutov G, Yurkov GY (2005) Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, structure and properties. Russ Chem Rev 74: 489.
- 39. Lima E, Brandl A, Arelaro A, Goya G (2006) Spin disorder and magnetic anisotropy in Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 99: 083908–083910.
- 40. Darbandi M, Stromberg F, Landers J, Reckers N, Sanyal B, et al. (2012) Nanoscale size effect on surface spin canting in iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by the microemulsion method. J Phys D: Applied Physics 45: 195001.
- 41. Pal S, Dutta P, Shah N, Huffman G, Seehra M (2007) Surface Spin Disorder in Fe3O4 nanoparticles probrd by Electron Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Magnetometry. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions 43: 3091–3093.
- 42. Frey NA, Peng S, Cheng K, Sun S (2009) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in bioimaging and magnetic energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 38: 2532–2542.
- 43. Yang T, Shen C, Li Z, Zhang H, Xiao C, et al. (2005) Highly ordered self-assembly with large area of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the magnetic properties. J Phys Chem B 109: 23233–23236.
- 44. Lu H, Zheng W, Jiang Q (2007) Saturation magnetization of ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic nanocrystals at room temperature. J Phys D: Applied Physics 40: 320.
- 45. Respaud M, Broto J, Rakoto H, Fert A, Thomas L, et al. (1998) Surface effects on the magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt particles. Phys Rev B 57: 2925.
- 46. Issa B, Obaidat IM, Albiss BA, Haik Y (2013) Magnetic Nanoparticles: Surface Effects and Properties Related to Biomedicine Applications. Int J Mol Sci 14: 21266–21305.
- 47. Shu-Li H, Hong-Wei Z, Chuan-Bing R, Ren-Jie C, Bao-Gen S (2005) Effects of grain size distribution on remanence and coercivity of Pr2Fe14B nanocrystalline magnet. Chinese Phys 14: 1055.
- 48. Mathew DS, Juang R-S (2007) An overview of the structure and magnetism of spinel ferrite nanoparticles and their synthesis in microemulsions. Chem Eng J 129: 51–65.
- 49. Naseri MG, Saion EB, Ahangar HA, Shaari AH, Hashim M (2010) Simple synthesis and characterization of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles by a thermal treatment method. J Nanomater 2010: 75.