Figures
Abstract
Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) is a naphthoquinone derivative from the roots of plant Plumbago zeylanica and belongs to one of the largest and diverse groups of plant metabolites. The anticancer and antiproliferative activities of plumbagin have been observed in animal models as well as in cell cultures. Plumbagin exerts inhibitory effects on multiple cancer-signaling proteins, however, the binding mode and the molecular interactions have not yet been elucidated for most of these protein targets. The present study is the first attempt to provide structural insights into the binding mode of plumbagin to five cancer signaling proteins viz. PI3Kγ, AKT1/PKBα, Bcl-2, NF-κB, and Stat3 using molecular docking and (un)binding simulation analysis. We validated plumbagin docking to these targets with previously known important residues. The study also identified and characterized various novel interacting residues of these targets which mediate the binding of plumbagin. Moreover, the exact modes of inhibition when multiple mode of inhibition existed was also shown. Results indicated that the engaging of these important interacting residues in plumbagin binding leads to inhibition of these cancer-signaling proteins which are key players in the pathogenesis of cancer and thereby ceases the progression of the disease.
Citation: Jamal MS, Parveen S, Beg MA, Suhail M, Chaudhary AGA, Damanhouri GA, et al. (2014) Anticancer Compound Plumbagin and Its Molecular Targets: A Structural Insight into the Inhibitory Mechanisms Using Computational Approaches. PLoS ONE 9(2): e87309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087309
Editor: Aamir Ahmad, Wayne State University School of Medicine, United States of America
Received: October 10, 2013; Accepted: December 19, 2013; Published: February 27, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Parveen et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The work presented in the research paper was financially supported by the King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cancer is the leading cause of disease worldwide accounting for 12.7 million new cases every year and this number is expected to rise to a whopping 26 million by 2030 [1]. Considering the impact on human health and economics, cancer presents a major challenge to the scientific world and there is a necessity to discover novel agents for the treatment of this disease. Several studies have been focused on naturally occurring chemical compounds which are known to possess cytotoxic effects and have the potential for killing cancer cells [2]–[3]. Plumbagin (PL; 5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone, Figure 1) is one such important compound, which is a naphthoquinone derivative identified from the roots of plant Plumbago zeylanica and belongs to one of the largest and diverse groups of plant metabolites [4]–[6]. The anticancer and antiproliferative activities of PL have been observed in animal models as well as in cell cultures [7]–[12]. The anticancer activities of PL have been shown against a wide variety of cancers including breast cancer [13], lung cancer [14]–[15], ovarian cancer [16], acute promyelocytic leukemia [17], and prostate cancer [18]–[19]. The inhibitory effect of PL was shown by alterations of various signaling pathways which play a crucial role in cancer cell proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis [14], [16], [18], [20]–[22] through suppression of major signaling molecules such as nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) [23], AKT/mTOR [13], and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) [24].
The IUPAC name of the plumbagin is '5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone'. The carbon atoms are shown with the IUPAC numbering. The numbers are referred in the text wherever a particular atom of plumbagin is involved in molecular interaction with target proteins.
In the current study, we considered five key signaling molecules namely phosphatidyl inositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K), AKT (also known as PKB, protein kinase B), anti-apoptotic protein B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), NF-κB, and Stat3 which play important role in cancer development and progression. These molecules have already been reported [13], [18], [23], [25] to show direct inhibition by PL. Owing to their key role in cancer development, these regulatory molecules are frequently targeted in anticancer therapy.
The PI3K and AKT pathway, commonly known as PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, is perhaps the most frequently dysregulated pathway in human cancers [26]–[29]. Consequently, significant efforts have been made to generate inhibitors of the key kinases in PI3K pathway including PI3K, AKT, and mTOR in recent years [30]. Plumbagin targets PI3K in human breast cancer cells and drastically decreases the level of PI3K subunit p85 causing downstream AKT/mTOR pathway inhibition leading to growth arrest and cell death [13], [25]. The PL target, AKT, plays an important role as antiapoptotic protein [31], [32] and is a widely exploited for anticancer therapy [33]–[35]. Plumbagin inhibited AKT kinase activity and induced autophagy in two cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 [13].
The signaling molecule NF-κB transcription factor plays a major role in the development and progression of various types of cancer [36]–[38]. A constitutive and continuous NF-κB activity is observed in various cancer tumors including lymphoid or myeloid tumors [39]–[42]. In addition, tumor cells often exploit NF-κB to achieve resistance to chemo- and radio-therapy [43]. Anti-cancer therapies have been developed by exploiting the inhibitors of NF-κB which may reduce the progression and development of the disease and/or may improve the efficacy of conventional therapies [44]. In this regard, certain inhibitors were discovered which suppress activity of NF-κB by directly blocking its binding to DNA [45]–[47]. Using the similar mechanism, PL inhibits NF-κB activity by interfering with the binding of DNA to NF-κB as demonstrated by gel shift assay of nuclear proteins [23], [25].
The Bcl-2 family of proteins are the principal regulators of programmed cell death or apoptosis [48], [49]. The over-expression of Bcl-2 has been observed in various cancers which contributes to drug resistance [50] and enhances in-vivo cell survival [51] while reduction in Bcl-2 expression increases drug sensitivity [52]. Several reports [53]–[58] have explored the development of inhibitors of Bcl-2 protein as potential anti-cancer drugs. In this regard, plumbagin has also been shown to induce apoptosis by down-regulation and inactivation of Bcl-2 in human breast cancer cells [25].
The signaling molecule Stat3 is constitutively activated in many human cancers and has been widely exploited as therapeutic target for cancer therapy [59]–[63]. In this regards, plumbagin has been shown [18] to inhibit the DNA-binding activity of Stat3 in prostate cancer cell lines, DU145, PC-3, and CWR22rv1.
Although PL mediated inhibition of the aforementioned five signaling molecules has been reported as reviewed above, the binding mechanisms and the molecular interactions of PL with these key cancer regulatory molecules is apparently not known. Plumbagin docking has been reported previously with few protein molecules [16], [64]–[68], however, the present study is the first attempt to investigate the structural and molecular details of PL binding against five key cancer signaling targets viz. PI3Kγ, AKT1/PKBα, Bcl-2, NF-κB, and Stat3 using molecular docking and ligand (un)binding simulation approach. In addition, we also identified and ranked some important interacting residues of these target proteins.
Materials and Methods
Data retrieval
The molecular structure of PL was retrieved from PubChem compound database with CID 10205. The 3-D structures of five chosen cancer signaling targets were retrieved from Protein Data Bank (PDB) and are: AKT1 (PDB ID: 3O96), Bcl-2(PDB ID: 2O21), NF-κB (PDB ID: 3GUT), PI3Kγ (PDB ID: 3L54), and Stat3 (PDB ID: 1BG1). The bound ligand was used as probe for the binding site grid generation. In case of Stat3 protein, the available structure is from mouse and differs from the human homolog in an amino acid residue at 760 position (Asp instead of Glu in human). The Stat3 structure contains 3D atomic coordinates until the amino acid residue at 716 position. Therefore, being 100% identical within the whole range of amino acids for which 3D coordinates are available, it will presumably serve as Stat3 structure for human as well. All the software tools used in this study are summarized in Table 1.
Molecular docking
Dock v.6.5 from the University of California, San Francisco was used for all computer simulations and docking of PL into the active site pockets of five chosen cancer drug targets was achieved [69]. The best conformation search strategy exploited in the present work was random conformation search, which utilized the existing Coulombic and Lennard-Jones grid-based scoring function. The whole process of docking involves multiple steps. Briefly, once the potential site of interest is identified on the receptor, a grid is generated within the site and each grid point is considered as a sphere center. The orientation of the ligand within the site of interest is calculated using a set of matching atom-sphere pairs. To evaluate the orientation of the ligand within the site, a shape scoring function and/or a function approximating the ligand-protein binding energy is used. The ligand-protein binding energy is an approximate sum of the van der Waals attractive, van der Waals dispersive, and Coulombic electrostatic energies. As a final step, to minimize the energy score, the orientation of the ligand is varied slightly and evaluated. After the initial orientation and evaluation (scoring) of the ligand, a simplex minimization is used to reach the nearest local minimum of the energy score. The orientation of the ligand corresponding to the nearest local minimum energy score serves as the final docked ligand.
Analysis of docked protein-ligand complex
PyMOL v.1.3 [70] was used to analyze and generate an illustration of whole protein-ligand complex. LigPlot+ v.1.4.3 program [71]–[72] was used for analyzing the interaction of docked protein-ligand complex to check the polar and hydrophobic interactions between the receptor and ligand and illustrations of molecular interactions between PL and the chosen proteins were generated. To confirm the involvement of interacting residues obtained from LigPlot+, loss in Accessible Surface Area (ASA) was calculated. If a residue lost more than 10 Å2 ASA in the direction from the unbound to the bound state, it was considered to be involved in interaction [73]. The ASA of unbound protein and the protein-ligand complex were calculated using Naccess v.2.1.1 [74]. The change in ASA (ΔASA) of the ith residue in the direction from unbound to bound state was calculated using the expression:
In addition to the Dock score (Grid score) obtained from Dock [69], the binding energies and dissociation constants were also calculated by X-Score v.1.2.11 [75]–[76].
Protein-ligand (un)binding simulation
MoMA-LigPath (http://moma.laas.fr), a web server which works on Molecular Motion Algorithms (MoMA) [77]–[78], simulates the ligand unbinding from the binding site of the protein to the surface of the protein. It considers the flexibility for the protein side-chains and the ligand, and involves only geometric constraints. This method provides mechanistic information about how ligand is driven to the binding site from the surface of the protein or from the binding site to the surface. It also provides snapshots of molecular interactions leading the ligand from surface of the protein to the binding site. In the process, it identifies those residues which despite being away from the binding site still play important role in ligand binding or in driving the ligand to the binding site. The docked molecular complex was subjected to (un)binding simulation using MoMA-LigPath.
Results and Discussion
Plumbagin docking and (un)binding simulation study of PI3Kγ
The snapshots of molecular interactions leading the ligand from surface of the protein to the active site are shown in Figure 2A–G. Final binding in the active site and the molecular interactions holding PL in the active site are shown (Figure 2F-G, Table 2). Plumbagin packs against the residues Ile-963, Met-953, Val-882, Ile-881, Glu-880, Ile-879, Tyr-867, Ile-831, Trp-812 and Met-804 (Table 3). In the final docking phase of PI3Kγ, a hydrogen bond was formed between O-atom of 1-carbonyl group of PL and α-amino group of Val-882 and other 34 hydrophobic interactions were from 10 different residues (Figure 2F, Table 2, Table 3). The Dock score was highly negative and binding energy was also comparable to that of the known inhibitor while the dissociation constant was approximately one tenth of the known inhibitor (Table 2). The residues Trp-812, Val-882, and Met-953 were common in all the phases of PL (un)binding simulation, showing their importance in initial recruitment of PL from surface of the protein to the deep binding site (Figure 2). Previously, the residues of PI3Kα subunit viz. Ile-800, Ile-848, Val-850, and Val-851, (the equivalent residues in PI3Kγ are Ile-831, Ile-879, Ile-881 and Val-882 respectively) were also reported to play a role in binding of the inhibitor wortmannin. Specifically, the residue Val-851 (equivalent to Val-882 of PI3Kγ) was involved in hydrogen bonding to wortmannin through its amide group [79]. Also in an earlier report [80], a highly potent inhibitor GSK2126458 of PI3Kγ was co-crystallized with the protein (PDB IDs: 3L54, 3L08) in which Val-882 was involved in hydrogen bonding. In another study [81], Val-882 through its backbone was also found to be involved in hydrogen bonding with H-bond acceptor in five different inhibitors i.e. wortmannin, LY294002, quercetin, myricetin, and staurosporine. The wortmannin was found to be packing itself against N-terminal lobe residues of PI3Kγ viz. Ile-831, Ile-879, Ile-881, and Val-882 [81] which are overlapping with the PL binding site. The hydrogen-bonding feature by the residue Val-882 was reported to be conserved in all kinase-inhibitor complexes [82]. In this regard, our docking simulations of PL and PI3Kγ were in agreement with the above studies e.g., the conserved H-bonding feature of Val-882 and the other common residues involved in PL binding. These consistent findings provided validation for our molecular docking and also showed that PL inhibits PI3Kγ with the mechanism similar to those of other reported inhibitors.
Panels A–F: show the (un)binding simulation phases of PL, 'A' is farthest from the binding site, 'E' is the closest to the binding site, and 'F' is the binding site phase. The hydrogen bonds are shown as green-dashed lines with indicated bond length and the residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are shown as red arcs. Those residues which are common to the last phase (F) are encircled. Panel G: Another representation for phase F. The whole protein is displayed in cartoon representation and the ligand molecules are in sticks; PL colored as green and the bound known inhibitor in blue. The interacting residues are labeled and shown as surface in different colors.
Plumbagin docking and (un)binding simulation study of AKT1
The mechanistic study of PL binding provided information of varying molecular interactions with respect to decreasing distance from binding site (Figure 3A–E). The analysis of docking of AKT1 has revealed that PL binds deep inside the cavity and is stabilized by the hydrophobic interactions (Figure 3F–G). However, the binding energy and dissociation constant of PL was lesser than the bound inhibitor (Table 2, Table 3). This may occur due to the smaller size of PL than the bound inhibitor. The Dock score was also highly negative and number of hydrophobic interactions that kept PL bound in the cavity was also reasonably high (27 interactions from 6 different residues) as mentioned in Table 2. The key residue in AKT1 for PL binding was Trp-80, which was common through all phases of PL (un)binding simulation, demonstrating its importance in initial binding of PL and finally bringing it into the active site (Figure 3). The Trp-80 was also involved in the majority of hydrophobic interactions and showed highest decrease in its solvent accessibility after PL binding (approx 60 Å2) as shown in Table 3. This finding was consistent with a study [83] in which it was shown that the inhibition by Akti (an inhibitor of AKT) is critically dependent upon a solvent-exposed tryptophan residue (Trp-80) present in all three AKT isoforms and whose mutation to an alanine yields an Akti-resistant kinase. It was observed that the Trp-80 acts as the key interacting residue in docking and (un)binding simulation study of PL suggesting that PL also inhibits AKT1 by the mechanism similar to that of Akti inhibitor and, therefore, validated our docking predictions for AKT1 as well. The Akti acts as non-ATP-competitive allosteric inhibitor and blocks AKT phosphorylation and does not lead to active phosphorylated state of AKT [83] and thus the PL also inhibits AKT1 by the similar mechanism i.e., acts as non-ATP-competitive allosteric inhibitor. The inhibitory mechanism of PL (similar to Akti) is in contrast to ATP-competitive inhibitors, which protect the phosphorylated site of AKT from dephosphoryation by phosphatases [83].
Panels A–F: show the (un)binding simulation phases of PL, 'A' is farthest from the binding site, 'E' is the closest to the binding site, and 'F' is the binding site phase. The residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are shown as red arcs. Those residues which are common to the last phase (F) are encircled. Panel G: Another representation for phase F. The whole protein is displayed in cartoon representation and the ligand molecules are in sticks; PL colored as green and the bound known inhibitor in blue. The interacting residues are labeled and shown as surface in different colors.
Plumbagin docking and (un)binding simulation study of Bcl-2
The (un)binding simulation phases of PL with increasing number of molecular interactions while approaching towards the binding site are shown in Figure 4A–D. The docking phase (Figure 4D-E) showed molecular interactions of Bcl-2 with PL which binds on the exterior region of Bcl-2 cavity using hydrophobic interactions. Owing to the large size of previously known Bcl-2 inhibitor (acyl-sulfonamide-based ligand) [84] in the complex structure (PDB ID: 2O21), the binding constant and binding energy of PL was much smaller than that of the inhibitor (Table 2). In previous studies of molecular docking of inhibitor compounds, the residue Tyr-199 of Bcl-2 was involved in hydrogen bonding [85], [86]. However, in the present study, Tyr-199 was not involved in hydrogen bonding, rather this residue was involved in maximum number of hydrophobic interactions and lost maximum surface accessibility (47 Å2) while switching to bound state (Figure 4D, Table 3). The Tyr-199 was also found to be common in all phases of (un)binding simulation of PL which again shows its importance for PL binding (Figure 4). All the observations for Tyr-199, such as the maximum number of hydrophobic interactions involved, the maximum loss in surface accessibility, and the common residues in (un)binding simulation were corroborating with one another. Furthermore, the key residue involved, Tyr-199, was also same as observed in the previous docking studies with other inhibitors [85]-[86].
Panels A–D: show the (un)binding simulation phases of PL, 'A' is farthest from the binding site, 'C' is the closest to the binding site, and 'D' is the binding site phase. The residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are shown as red arcs. Those residues which are common to the last phase (D) are encircled. Panel E: Another representation for phase D. The whole protein is displayed in cartoon representation and the ligand molecules are in sticks; PL colored as green and the bound known inhibitor in blue. The interacting residues are labeled and shown as surface in different colors.
Plumbagin docking and (un)binding simulation study of NF-κB
The molecular docking and (un)binding simulation study of NF-κB with the interacting residues and molecular interactions are shown in Figure 5A-B. The first phase (Figure 5A) represents multiple stages of binding where the interacting residues were same but PL is approaching towards binding site and at variable distance. In the molecular docking phase (Figure 5B-C), PL packed against the residues Lys-123, Lys-122, Val-121, Tyr-36, and Asn-155. As shown in the Figure 5B, PL formed two hydrogen bonds, one between O-atom of 1-carbonyl group of PL and N-atom of amide group of Asn-155 (2.98 Å) and the other between O-atom of 4-carbonyl group of PL and α-amino of Lys-122 (2.98 Å). There were 11 hydrophobic interactions from 4 different residues (Table 2, Table 3). It has been reported [87] that the Lys-122 and Lys-123 of NF-κB p65 subunit are the only acetyl-acceptor lysines which contact with DNA in minor groove as revealed from the crystal structure of the p50/p65 heterodimer bound to DNA. The acetylation of these residues reduces κB-DNA binding (may be neutralized by the positive charge on Lys-122 and Lys-123 ε-amino groups) and represses its transcriptional activity, and thus leads to attenuation of p65-mediated transcription [87]. In our study, of the two lysine residues, Lys-122 formed H-bond and Lys-123 was involved in non-bonding contact with PL. Lys-123 was also found common among all phases of (un)binding simulation study (Figure 5). Therefore, the lysine residues (Lys-122, Lys-123) were not available for DNA binding, which resulted in the reduction in the DNA binding activity. The Dock score, the binding energy, and the dissociation constant were also comparable with the docking results of other chosen targets (Table 2).
Panels A-B: show the (un)binding simulation phases of PL, 'A' is farthest from the binding site and representing many stages always coming with 2 interacting residues and 'B' is the binding site phase. The hydrogen bonds are shown as green-dashed lines with indicated bond length and the residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are shown as red arcs. Those residues which are common to the last phase (B) are encircled. Panel C: Another representation for phase B. The whole protein is displayed in cartoon representation and PL in sticks colored as green. The interacting residues are labeled and shown as surface in different colors.
Plumbagin docking and (un)binding simulation study of Stat3
The (un)binding simulation phases with the increasing molecular interactions are shown in Figure 6A–C. The docking phase (Figure 6C-D) showed that PL bound to the DNA binding domain and packed against the residues Gly-421, Gly-419, Cys-418, Arg-417, Glu-415, and Arg-382. The Arg-417 was involved in hydrogen bonding interaction through the Nε atom of its guanidium group (Figure 6C) and also showed maximum loss of solvent accessibility in PL bound state (Table 3). Other residues involving hydrophobic contacts also showed significant loss in solvent accessibility in switching from unbound to bound state (Table 3). A mutational analysis study [88] created the dual mutation Arg-414/417 that led to complete loss of DNA binding activity of Stat3. The NH1 of guanidium group of Arg-417 is involved in hydrogen bonding with phospho-diester bonds of bases T-1007 and T-2007 (from complementary strand) [89]–[90]. Similarly, another residue Arg-382, is also reported to be involved in hydrogen bonding with phospho-diester bonds of bases T-1006 and T-2006 (from complementary strand) [89]–[90]. In another study, it has been reported that the residue Arg-382 when mutated to Trp and Gln abrogated the DNA-binding ability of Stat3 homo-dimer [91]. In our study, Arg-417 with 2 other residues (Cys-418, Gly-419) was found to be common throughout all phases of (un)binding simulation study (Figure 6). The residues Arg-417 (H-bonding, maximum loss of solvent accessibility, common in (un)binding simulation) and Arg-382 (hydrophobic contacts) play important role in PL binding, which is in agreement with the aforementioned studies. The Dock score is also highly negative comparable to the docking results of other chosen targets. The binding energy and the dissociation constant for PL were also similar to the results of other chosen targets (Table 2).
Panels A–C: show the (un)binding simulation phases of PL, 'A' is farthest from the binding site, 'B' is the closest to the binding site, and 'C' is the binding site phase. The hydrogen bonds are shown as green-dashed lines with indicated bond length and the residues involved in hydrophobic interactions are shown as red arcs. Those residues which are common to the last phase (C) are encircled. Panel D: Another representation for phase C. The whole protein is displayed in cartoon representation and PL in sticks colored as green. The interacting residues are labeled and shown as surface in different colors.
Conclusions
The present study for the first time used docking and (un)binding simulation analysis to identify interacting residues of five important cancer-signaling proteins and their molecular interactions with PL. Plumbagin inhibited the molecules by involving their functionally important residues leading to the loss of function. Among various important residues identified during the docking analysis, the key residues for the chosen proteins that play major role in PL mediated inhibition are: the PI3Kγ residue, Val-882, involved in the hydrogen-bonding interaction; the AKT1 residue, Trp-80, showing highest decrease in the solvent accessibility after PL binding; the Bcl-2 residue, Tyr-199, showing maximum hydrophobic interactions; the NF-κB residue, Lys-122, involved in H-bond formation; and the Stat3 residue, Arg-417, forming H-bond. The exact mode of inhibition was indicated when multiple modes of inhibition existed (i.e. AKT1). In all the five signaling target molecules, the Dock score was highly negative, which showed good quality docking. We also presented the exact binding of PL and identified and characterized various interacting residues within the active sites of respective chosen proteins. In addition, we ranked the importance of residues for PL binding using ASA analysis. Also, the importance of residues was shown by ASA analysis (higher loss in solvent accessibility) and interaction analysis (high number of hydrophobic interactions or presence of H-bond) and by their consistent appearance in (un)binding simulation phases. A peculiar observation in this study was that PL formed hydrogen bond interactions with the target proteins only through the oxygen-atom of 1-carbonyl group which acted as a strong hydrogen donor. This finding may be useful for increasing drug potency in lead optimization where PL will serve as starting lead compound. The current study of PL docking analysis provides the structural insights into the binding mechanism of PL to the five chosen cancer signaling molecules. The PL-protein architecture is expected to guide scientists as a suitable model for understanding the multi-targeting drug structure and in providing structural details for the inhibitory mechanisms.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to Shalu Jhanwar for valuable comments, Sultan Ahmad for proof reading of the manuscript, and Azhar Kamal for helping in literature search. We also thank M. S. Gazdar, head of library, KFMRC for easy access of books and journals. Thanks are also due to Dr. J. Cortés for providing stand alone version of MoMA-LigPath and for his valuable suggestions.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MR SP MSJ. Performed the experiments: SP MR. Analyzed the data: MR SP. Wrote the paper: MR SP MAB MSJ AGAC GAD MS AMA.
References
- 1.
ACS (2008) Global Cancer Facts & Figure. American Cancer Society: 1–60.
- 2. Persidis A (1999) Cancer multidrug resistance. Nature Biotechnol 17: 94–95.
- 3. Russo GL (2007) Ins and outs of dietary phytochemicals in cancer chemoprevention. Biochem Pharmacol 74: 533–544.
- 4. Chen CA, Chang HH, Kao CY, Tsai TH, Chen YJ, et al. (2009) Plumbagin, isolated from Plumbago zeylanica, induces cell death through apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreatology 9: 797–809.
- 5. Sakamoto S, Taura F, Putalun W, Pongkitwitoon B, Tsuchihashi R, et al. (2009) Construction and expression of specificity-improved single-chain variable fragments against the bioactive naphthoquinone, plumbagin. Biol Pharm Bull 32: 434–439.
- 6. Shih YW, Lee YC, Wu PF, Lee YB, Chiang TA (2009) Plumbagin inhibits invasion and migration of liver cancer HepG2 cells by decreasing productions of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and urokinase- plasminogen activator. Hepatology Research 39: 998–1009.
- 7. Hazra B, Sarkar R, Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh PK, Chel G, et al. (2002) Synthesis of plumbagin derivatives and their inhibitory activities against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in vivo and Leishmania donovani Promastigotes in vitro. Phytother Res 16: 133–137.
- 8. Naresh RA, Udupa N, Devi PU (1996) Niosomal plumbagin with reduced toxicity and improved anticancer activity in BALB/C mice. J Pharm and Pharmacol 48: 1128–1132.
- 9. Parimala R, Sachdanandam P (1993) Effect of Plumbagin on some glucose metabolising enzymes studied in rats in experimental hepatoma. Mol Cell Biochem 125: 59–63.
- 10. Singh UV, Udupa N (1997) Reduced toxicity and enhanced antitumor efficacy of betacyclodextrin plumbagin inclusion complex in mice bearing Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 41: 171–175.
- 11. Krishnaswamy M, Purushothaman KK (1980) Plumbagin: A study of its anticancer, antibacterial & antifungal properties. Indian J Exp Biol 18: 876–877.
- 12. Sugie S, Okamoto K, Rahman KM, Tanaka T, Kawai K, et al. (1998) Inhibitory effects of plumbagin and juglone on azoxymethane-induced intestinal carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Lett 127: 177–183.
- 13. Kuo PL, Hsu YL, Cho CY (2006) Plumbagin induces G2-M arrest and autophagy by inhibiting the AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in breast cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 5: 3209–3221.
- 14. Gomathinayagam R, Sowmyalakshmi S, Mardhatillah F, Kumar R, Akbarsha MA, et al. (2008) Anticancer mechanism of plumbagin, a natural compound, on non-small cell lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res 28: 785–792.
- 15. Hsu YL, Cho CY, Kuo PL, Huang YT, Lin CC (2006) Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in A549 cells through p53 accumulation via c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-mediated phosphorylation at serine 15 in vitro and in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeutics 318: 484–494.
- 16. Thasni KA, Rakesh S, Rojini G, Ratheeshkumar T, Srinivas G, et al. (2008) Estrogen-dependent cell signaling and apoptosis in BRCA1-blocked BG1 ovarian cancer cells in response to plumbagin and other chemotherapeutic agents. Ann Oncol 19: 696–705.
- 17. Zhao YL, Lu DP (2006) Effects of plumbagin on the human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells in vitro. J Exp Hematol 14: 208–211.
- 18. Aziz MH, Dreckschmidt NE, Verma AK (2008) Plumbagin, a medicinal plant-derived naphthoquinone, is a novel inhibitor of the growth and invasion of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res 68: 9024–9032.
- 19. Powolny AA, Singh SV (2008) Plumbagin-induced apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells is associated with modulation of cellular redox status and generation of reactive oxygen species. Pharm Res 25: 2171–2180.
- 20. Demma J, Hallberg K, Hellman B (2009) Genotoxicity of plumbagin and its effects on catechol and NQNO-induced DNA damage in mouse lymphoma cells. Toxicol in Vitro 23: 266–271.
- 21. Nazeem S, Azmi AS, Hanif S, Ahmad A, Mohammad RM, et al. (2009) Plumbagin induces cell death through a copper-redox cycle mechanism in human cancer cells. Mutagenesis 24: 413–418.
- 22. Wang CC, Chiang YM, Sung SC, Hsu YL, Chang JK, et al. (2008) Plumbagin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through reactive oxygen species/c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways in human melanoma A375.S2 cells. Cancer Lett 259: 82–98.
- 23. Sandur SK, Ichikawa H, Sethi G, Ahn KS, Aggarwal BB (2006) Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) suppresses NF-kappaB activation and NF-kappaB-regulated gene products through modulation of p65 and IkappaBalpha kinase activation, leading to potentiation of apoptosis induced by cytokine and chemotherapeutic agents. J Biol Chem 281: 17023–17033.
- 24. Sandur SK, Pandey MK, Sung B, Aggarwal BB (2010) 5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone, a vitamin K3 analogue, suppresses STAT3 activation pathway through induction of protein tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1: potential role in chemosensitization. Mol Cancer Res 8: 107–118.
- 25. Ahmad A, Banerjee S, Wang Z, Kong D, Sarkar FH (2008) Plumbagin-induced apoptosis of human breast cancer cells is mediated by inactivation of NF-kappaB and Bcl-2. J Cell Biochem 105: 1461–1471.
- 26. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC (2006) The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet 7: 606–619.
- 27. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304: 554.
- 28. Cheng H, Li C, Bailey S, Baxi SM, Goulet L, et al. (2013) Discovery of the Highly Potent PI3K/mTOR Dual Inhibitor PF-04979064 through Structure-Based Drug Design. ACS Med Chem Lett 4: 91–97.
- 29. Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ (2009) Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8: 627–644.
- 30. Shuttleworth SJ, Silva FA, Cecil ARL, Tomassi CD, Hill TJ, et al. (2011) Progress in the preclinical discovery and clinical development of class I and dual class I/IV phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 18: 2686–2714.
- 31. Martelli AM, Faenza I, Billi AM, Manzoli L, Evangelisti C, et al. (2006) Intranuclear 3'-phosphoinositide metabolism and Akt signaling: new mechanisms for tumorigenesis and protection against apoptosis? Cell Signal 18: 1101–1107.
- 32. Ye K (2005) PIKE/nuclear PI 3-kinase signaling in preventing programmed cell death. J Cell Biochem 96: 463–472.
- 33. Steelman LS, Stadelman KM, Chappell WH, Horn S, Bäsecke J, et al. (2008) Akt as a therapeutic target in cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 12: 1139–1165.
- 34. Cheng JQ, Lindsley CW, Cheng GZ, Yang H, Nicosia SV (2005) The Akt/PKB pathway: molecular target for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene 24: 7482–7492.
- 35. Lindsley CW, Barnett SF, Yaroschak M, Bilodeau MT, Layton ME (2007) Recent progress in the development of ATP-competitive and allosteric Akt kinase inhibitors. Curr Top Med Chem 7: 1349–1363.
- 36. Rayet B, Gélinas C (1999) Aberrant rel/nfkb genes and activity in human cancer. Oncogene 18: 6938–6947.
- 37. Pikarsky E, Ben-Neriah Y (2006) NF-kappaB inhibition: a double-edged sword in cancer? Eur J Cancer 42: 779–784.
- 38. Kim HJ, Hawke N, Baldwin AS (2006) NF-kappaB and IKK as therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Death Differ 13: 738–747.
- 39. Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li Z-W (2002) NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 301–310.
- 40. Loercher A, Lee TL, Ricker JL, Howard A, Geoghegen J, et al. (2004) Nuclear factor-kappaB is an important modulator of the altered gene expression profile and malignant phenotype in squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Research 64: 6511–6523.
- 41. Robe PA, Bentires-Alj M, Bonif M, Rogister B, Deprez M, et al. (2004) In vitro and in vivo activity of the nuclear factor-kappaB inhibitor sulfasalazine in human glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 10: 5595–5603.
- 42. Sovak MA, Bellas RE, Kim DW, Zanieski GJ, Rogers AE, et al. (1997) Aberrant nuclear factor-kappaB/Rel expression and the pathogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Invest 100: 2952–2960.
- 43. Nakanishi C, Toi M (2005) Nuclear factor-kappaB inhibitors as sensitizers to anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 297–309.
- 44. Karin M, Yamamoto Y, Wang QM (2004) The IKK NF-kappa B system: a treasure trove for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 17–26.
- 45. Finco TS, Beg AA, Baldwin AS Jr (1994) Inducible phosphorylation of I kappa B alpha is not sufficient for its dissociation from NF-kappa B and is inhibited by protease inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 11884–11888.
- 46. Mahon TM, O'Neill LA (1995) Studies into the effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin A on NF-kappa B activation in T lymphocytes. Evidence for covalent modification of the p50 subunit. J Biol Chem 270: 28557–28564.
- 47. Natarajan K, Singh S, Burke TR Jr, Grunberger D, Aggarwal BB (1996) Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of activation of nuclear transcription factor NF-kappa B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93: 9090–9095.
- 48. Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ (2004) Cell death: critical control points. Cell 116: 205–219.
- 49. Kluck R (2010) Bcl-2 family-regulated apoptosis in health and disease. Cell Health Cytoskelet 2: 9–22.
- 50. Kirkin V, Joos S, Zörnig M (2004) The role of Bcl-2 family members in tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1644: 229–249.
- 51. Letai A, Sorcinelli MD, Beard C, Korsmeyer SJ (2004) Antiapoptotic BCL-2 is required for maintenance of a model leukemia. Cancer Cell 6: 241–249.
- 52. Reed JC (1997) Promise and problems of Bcl-2 antisense therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 988–990.
- 53. Bajwa N, Liao C, NikolovskaColeska Z (2012) Inhibitors of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 22: 37–55.
- 54. Baell JB, Huang DCS (2002) Prospects for targeting the Bcl-2 family of proteins to develop novel cytotoxic drugs. Biochem Pharmacol 64: 851–863.
- 55. Enyedy IJ, Ling Y, Nacro K, Tomita Y, Wu X, et al. (2001) Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screening. J Med Chem 44: 4313–4324.
- 56. Klasa RJ, Gillum AM, Klem RE, Frankel SR (2002) Oblimersen Bcl-2 antisense: facilitating apoptosis in anticancer treatment. Antisense & Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 12: 193–213.
- 57. Tzung SP, Kim KM, Basañez G, Giedt CD, Simon J, et al. (2001) Antimycin A mimics a cell-death-inducing Bcl-2 homology domain 3. Nat Cell Biol 3: 183–191.
- 58. Wang JL, Liu D, Zhang ZJ, Shan S, Han X, et al. (2000) Structure-based discovery of an organic compound that binds Bcl-2 protein and induces apoptosis of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 7124–7129.
- 59. Turkson J, Jove R (2000) STAT proteins: novel molecular targets for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene 19: 6613–6626.
- 60. Yue P, Turkson J (2009) Targeting STAT3 in cancer: how successful are we? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18: 45–56.
- 61. Yu H, Jove R (2004) The STATs of cancer--new molecular targets come of age. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 97–105.
- 62. Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R (2009) STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 798–809.
- 63. Jing N, Tweardy DJ (2005) Targeting Stat3 in cancer therapy. Anti-Cancer Drugs 16: 601–607.
- 64. Shukla S, Wu C-P, Nandigama K, Ambudkar SV (2007) The naphthoquinones, vitamin K3 and its structural analogue plumbagin, are substrates of the multidrug resistance linked ATP binding cassette drug transporter ABCG2. Mol Cancer Ther 6: 3279–3286.
- 65. Acharya BR, Bhattacharyya B, Chakrabarti G (2008) The natural naphthoquinone plumbagin exhibits antiproliferative activity and disrupts the microtubule network through tubulin binding. Biochemistry 47: 7838–7845.
- 66. Ravindra KC, Selvi BR, Arif M, Reddy BAA, Thanuja GR, et al. (2009) Inhibition of lysine acetyltransferase KAT3B/p300 activity by a naturally occurring hydroxynaphthoquinone, plumbagin. J Biol Chem 284: 24453–24464.
- 67. Dandawate P, Khan E, Padhye S, Gaba H, Sinha S, et al. (2012) Synthesis, characterization, molecular docking and cytotoxic activity of novel plumbagin hydrazones against breast cancer cells. ACS Med Chem Lett 22: 3104–3108.
- 68. Thasni KA, Ratheeshkumar T, Rojini G, Sivakumar KC, Nair RS, et al. (2013) Structure activity relationship of plumbagin in BRCA1 related cancer cells. Mol Carcinog 52: 392–403.
- 69. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15: 411–428.
- 70.
DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. San Carlos, CA. DeLano Scientific.
- 71. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51: 2778–2786.
- 72. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (1995) LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 8: 127–134.
- 73. Ghosh KS, Sen S, Sahoo BK, Dasgupta S (2009) A spectroscopic investigation into the interactions of 3'-O-carboxy esters of thymidine with bovine serum albumin. Biopolymers 91: 737–744.
- 74.
Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM (1993) ‘Naccess’, computer program. Technical Report. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London.
- 75. Wang R, Lai L, Wang S (2002) Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16: 11–26.
- 76. Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S (2003) Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J Med Chem 46: 2287–2303.
- 77. Devaurs D, Bouard L, Vaisset M, Zanon C, Al-Bluwi I, et al. (2013) MoMA-LigPath: a web server to simulate protein-ligand unbinding. Nucleic Acids Res 41(W1): W297–302.
- 78.
Cortés J, Siméon T, Ruiz de Angulo V, Guieysse D, Remaud-Simeon M, et al. (2005) A path planning approach for computing large-amplitude motions of flexible molecules. Bioinformatics, 21(Suppl 1):i116–125, 2005.
- 79. Mandelker D, Gabelli SB, Schmidt-Kittler O, Zhu J, Cheong I, et al. (2009) A frequent kinase domain mutation that changes the interaction between PI3Kalpha and the membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16996–17001.
- 80. Knight SD, Adams ND, Burgess JL, Chaudhari AM, Darcy MG, et al. (2010) Discovery of GSK2126458, a Highly Potent Inhibitor of PI3K and the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin. ACS Med Chem Lett 1: 39–43.
- 81. Walker EH, Pacold ME, Perisic O, Stephens L, Hawkins PT, et al. (2000) Structural determinants of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibition by wortmannin, LY294002, quercetin, myricetin, and staurosporine. Mol Cell 6: 909–919.
- 82. Lawrie AM, Noble ME, Tunnah P, Brown NR, Johnson LN, et al. (1997) Protein kinase inhibition by staurosporine revealed in details of the molecular interaction with CDK2. Nature Struct Biol 4: 796–801.
- 83. Green CJ, Göransson O, Kular GS, Leslie NR, Gray A, et al. (2008) Use of Akt inhibitor and a drug-resistant mutant validates a critical role for protein kinase B/Akt in the insulin-dependent regulation of glucose and system A amino acid uptake. J Biol Chem 283: 27653–27667.
- 84. Bruncko M, Oost TK, Belli BA, Ding H, Joseph MK, et al. (2007) Studies leading to potent, dual inhibitors of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. J Med Chem 50: 641–662.
- 85. Wei J, Kitada S, Stebbins JL, Placzek W, Zhai D, et al. (2010) Synthesis and biological evaluation of Apogossypolone derivatives as pan-active inhibitors of antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia-2 (Bcl-2) family proteins. J Med Chem 53: 8000–8011.
- 86. Wei J, Kitada S, Rega MF, Stebbins JL, Zhai D, et al. (2009) Apogossypol derivatives as pan-active inhibitors of antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia-2 (Bcl-2) family proteins. J Med Chem 52: 4511–4523.
- 87. Kiernan R, Brès V, Ng RWM, Coudart M-P, El Messaoudi S, et al. (2003) Post-activation turn-off of NF-kappa B-dependent transcription is regulated by acetylation of p65. J Biol Chem 278: 2758–2766.
- 88. Ma J, Zhang T, Novotny-Diermayr V, Tan ALC, Cao X (2003) A novel sequence in the coiled-coil domain of Stat3 essential for its nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem 278: 29252–29260.
- 89. Souissi I, Ladam P, Cognet JAH, Le Coquil S, Varin-Blank N, et al. (2012) A STAT3-inhibitory hairpin decoy oligodeoxynucleotide discriminates between STAT1 and STAT3 and induces death in a human colon carcinoma cell line. Molecular Cancer 11: 12.
- 90. Becker S, Groner B, Müller CW (1998) Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3beta homodimer bound to DNA. Nature 394: 145–151.
- 91. He J, Shi J, Xu X, Zhang W, Wang Y, et al. (2012) STAT3 mutations correlated with hyper-IgE syndrome lead to blockage of IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway. J Biosci 37: 243–257.